• Martha Wells, WITCH KING

    From Garrett Wollman@21:1/5 to All on Fri May 2 17:25:37 2025
    It's pretty unusual for me to do a write-up like this and I'm not much
    of a critic, so please bear with me.

    Martha Wells is a seasoned writer with a long career in both adult and
    YA SFF, but I had never heard of her until the Murderbot novellas
    started coming out about five years ago. I read the first one of
    those and decided that, while entertaining, the setting did not
    particularly interest me, and I did not bother with the subsequent
    books in that series -- which obviously did not stop Wells from
    winning All The Awards and getting a big streaming deal for it.

    Some time in early 2023, though, I started seeing critical buzz about
    a new book from Wells that *wasn't* set in the Murderbot universe. I
    am not sure whose advance review in particular prodded me -- I have no recollection of what the reviewer might have said, but it was probably
    Jo Walton or Amal El-Mohtar -- but I pre-ordered the new book, WITCH
    KING. In due time, it arrived, in an attractive first edition trade
    hardcover from tordotcom, but I did not read it. It was then
    nominated for the Hugo Award for Best Novel, and I got the electronic
    version in the Hugo voter's packet but still did not read it. In
    fact, WITCH KING was nominated for pretty much all the awards,
    although it didn't win the Hugo.

    So here I was with 463, mostly unread, .epub files on my tablet, and I
    really didn't want to start yet another read-through of something I
    already knew by heart, and so I just went fishing through old Hugo
    voter's packets and hit upon WITCH KING. I *knew* I had bought the
    book in hardcover not that long ego (recently enough that it was still
    sitting in a pile on the floor rather than being properly shelved), so
    it seemed as good a book as any to dig in to.

    The book starts with a Map and a Dramatis Personae, neither of which
    were particularly helpful or even all that intelligible without having
    gotten into the main text. That text, though, I found particularly
    hard to get into until I cottoned on to the narrative structure --
    Wells alternates chapters between the narrative present and a past
    some unknown time ago (but within the lifetime of the characters) in
    which those characters are the pricipal actors in an imperial
    rebellion. Often enough, some concept or individual is introduced
    casually in the "present" without explanation, and this thread is left
    hanging until the next historical chapter. Even by the very end of
    the book I still was left wondering whether the various peoples
    introduced in the text are all supposed to be different races of
    human, or something else.

    Anyway, the action of WITCH KING follows the main character,
    Kaiisteron, who is a demon, as he tries to unravel three interlocking conspiracies that led to him and his close associate the witch Ziede
    being poisoned and kept in stasis in an underwater prison. Kai and
    Ziede think they have been betrayed by someone high up in the Rising
    Worlds aristocracy, someone they thought was a friend (or at least not
    an enemy), but more urgently, Ziede's wife Tahren has gone missing.
    Tahren is an Immortal Marshall, albeit one viewed as "fallen" by her
    fellow immortals for willingly making common cause with mortals, and
    her disappearance -- during the lead-up to an important
    alliance-renewal ceremony that requires her presence -- suggests the involvement of some of the other immortals in her disappearance.

    I will admit to having been put off at the very opening of the story,
    which begins as Kai is waking up in the underwater prison as an
    inexpert mage is trying to take control of him: finding his present
    body dead, he drains the life out of the mage and takes over the body
    of one of the mage's servants. This is apparently a thing that demons
    do, or can do, but we are not introduced to Kai's demonic nature until
    a bit later in the story and I could have used a bit more introduction
    before the violence.

    This is, to be fair, a fairly violent book. There's no sex in it --
    with a different editor but fairly little in the way of textual change
    it could have been sold on the YA market -- but an awful lot of people
    are getting killed, and the one character who can't be killed is
    shrugging off a lot of what would be mortal wounds for a character who
    was mortal. (This appears to be one of those fantasy settings in
    which immortals can in fact be killed, at least with the right weapon;
    they just don't senesce.) When reading an unfamiliar novel, I find
    that I often have to stop reading for a while (sometimes days) before
    I can work though an action scene, and I still find that I often miss
    things as my eyes skim over the more uncomfortable details along with
    sometimes necessary narration. I didn't make a note of when I started
    reading, but I have a vague idea that it took me about a month,
    reading at most a few minutes a night for the first 200 or so virtual
    pages. (The hardcover is 414 pages; in my reader app, the .epub file
    paginates to about 350.)

    There's a lot about this setting that is only barely penciled in,
    leaving Wells plenty of scope for additional storytelling. She has a
    sequel planned, QUEEN DEMON, to be released this October, which
    according to the publisher's description, features these same
    characters.

    I liked these characters, somewhat to my surprise. I'll be
    pre-ordering the sequel. (But it might take me a year or two to get
    around to reading it!)

    -GAWollman

    --
    Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can, wollman@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together."
    my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Garrett Wollman@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 8 15:51:09 2025
    In article <vv2v6h$2qt6$1@usenet.csail.mit.edu>, I wrote:

    When reading an unfamiliar novel, I find that I often have to stop
    reading for a while (sometimes days) before I can work though an
    action scene, and I still find that I often miss things as my eyes
    skim over the more uncomfortable details along with sometimes
    necessary narration.

    I went back and reread it over the past week, and of course I did find
    things that I missed the first, much slower, time through. I also
    took a little while to look at the Goodreads reviews, and, ummm, even
    ignoring the people who (to put it charitably) bounced off, there are
    some *favorable* reviews where the reviewer clearly missed some very
    important sequence-of-events details.

    (I often get the impression that the people who "do" reviews -- no
    offense intended to present company -- are so pressed for time that
    they miss as much as they notice. Some of the Goodreads reviews that
    credit the publisher for providing an ARC left me with the feeling
    that all they read was the publisher's marketing material. There's
    "no spoilers" and there's "you've misunderstood how long the MC spent
    dead in a tomb".)

    One of the things that's bugging me after the second read-through is
    this bit near the end where the MC observes that most of the soldiers
    guarding a nobleman are male, and in that culture, soldiers are
    usually female, so these guards are probably conscripts and unhappy to
    be there.[1] That's ... ummm ... not unprecedented, certainly in
    fantasy settings if not real life, but it does leave me wondering what
    Wells is imagining in the background of this culture that would give
    rise to that. Perhaps the sequel will clarify more of the backstory.
    (It's already clear that there's an entire war that has been elided,
    about which we know little except that the characters in this book
    survived and occupy positions of some power.)

    -GAWollman

    [1] Now it's my turn to find out that I've misread something
    important.
    --
    Garrett A. Wollman | "Act to avoid constraining the future; if you can, wollman@bimajority.org| act to remove constraint from the future. This is Opinions not shared by| a thing you can do, are able to do, to do together."
    my employers. | - Graydon Saunders, _A Succession of Bad Days_ (2015)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)