I am also hoping they are scanning the Internet for the number 283.
On 5/15/25 7:18 PM, Andrew W wrote:
"JTEM" wrote in message news:1003u8e$2vgag$3@dont-email.me...
That's called an "Argument from ignorance."
"We don't know so, they can do it!"
The top levels of our governments and military do know.
Thank goodness for your ESP!
Seeing how you can read their minds, why don't you just tell
us where these aliens are hiding?
The unspoken lines in this story is how long these aliens
have been here,
and how many people that necessitates being
in on the secret without it all getting out...
It's not even good science fiction, really. More like bad
fan fiction.
i believe i was stating the opposite, that if a technological
civilization exists which is even 100 years more advanced than
our current state, we would not be able to even comprehend their
engineered products.
On 5/15/2025 8:09 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Two Hundred Eighty-Three card-carrying aliens in the State Department!
Have you no decency?
Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> writes:
On 5/15/2025 8:09 AM, Scott Dorsey wrote:
Two Hundred Eighty-Three card-carrying aliens in the State Department!
Have you no decency?
I think you have misattributed that statement (originating in a
highy crossposted troll from a bunch of alt.* groups) to Scott.
{crossposting elided}
On 5/13/25 7:38 PM, David Dalton wrote:
As I state on the "Waning Clamshell/another reset to pre-judging”
thread on alt.religion.druid, there are now 283 DNA-based aliens
in my region, which is basically the Earth Moon system but not
including deep inside the Earth and the Moon (see that thread
for an exact description).
I don't believe that there's any aliens here.
Oh, aliens have sent tech here, for certain.
When we search for life on distant worlds what we're actually
doing is analyzing light.
Different elements absorb different wavelengths...
This is how we can be all but certain of life on a world more
than 100 light years away!
But, think of this: We've only been searching for maybe 30 years,
or a little more.
That's it.
In a little more than 30 years we went from finding our very first
exoplanet to a very STRONG candidate for a life bearing world...
When did the earth become detectable this way to other worlds?
BILLIONS of years ago!
BILLIONS!
So if once AND ONLY ONCE every million years or so some aliens
detect the earth, notice that we're life bearing and sent a probe
to give us a look, there's been 2,0000 alien probes sent toards
us just since The Great Oxidation Event, the planet's first great
extinction event.
If it's just ONCE every million years, there's been over 60 since
the dinosaurs went extinct...
There's been two to three since the genus Homo arose -- Humans!
Again, that's if other civilizations go looking, spot us and send
a probe ONCE every million years...
kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) wrote in
news:1009sql$o2o$1@panix2.panix.com:
In article <10091ue$6ems$1@dont-email.me>, Titus G
<noone@nowhere.com> wrote:
On 17/05/25 05:41, Bob Casanova wrote:
snip
At least they get to watch
Rocky and Bullwinkle and Dobie Gillis.
On 5/19/25 6:52 AM, Malte Runz wrote:
There is no "actual evidence". According to you, as per last year or
so, photos and videos can be faked, people can, and do, lie about
their experiences, and the deep state keeps all the physical evidence
hidden from the public. What's left?
Is there evidence?
What kind of evidence? Why hide it? Who would have access to it?
Knowledge?
NOT looking for definitive answers but starting points.
"Bobbie Sellers" wrote in message news:100ah56$fsq2$1@dont-email.me...
On 5/16/25 19:19, Andrew W wrote:
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB2E1D39845498629555@185.151.15.190...
"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
news:1008hi7$fig$1@dont-email.me:
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB2E1844A41583629555@185.151.15.160...
Malte Runz <nobodys@busine.ss> wrote in
news:d2se2kd3522ql7j97e64e3upbh2snqj4pg@4ax.com:
On Fri, 16 May 2025 12:16:47 +1000, "Andrew W" <space@defense.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB2E0D047FD4F5629555@185.151.15.160...
"Andrew W" <space@defense.com> wrote in
news:1005t7r$3cnf6$1@dont-email.me:
"Mitchell Holman" wrote in message
news:XnsB2E04EFADAAA0629555@185.151.15.190...
Has that happened since the discovery
of hundreds of exoplanets?
Discovery of exoplanets is only the first step. They're still not >>>>>>>> telling the people the important details like the earth's true >>>>>>>> history and who/what else is in this galaxy.
I take it that you know many of the details. You know Earth's true >>>>>>> history and a lot of other facts about what goes on in this galaxy. >>>>>>>
But instead of sharing that information, and your sources, with us, >>>>>>> you'll spend post after post coming up with excuses for not doing >>>>>>> it.
'You're too lazy to do your own research.' 'I can't list all the >>>>>>> information I've spent decades finding.' 'The deep state has
destroyed the evidence.' 'You only believe MSM.' 'You're mind
controlled by the elites.' 'Why do you even need evidence?'
On and on it goes. We been through this many times before, so unless >>>>>>> you have some new material, I'll suggest you go fuck yourself. Cool? >>>>>>
It is depressing there are so many
conspiracy-behind-everything kooks like
him. Their lives re so unremarkable and
enpty they invent a "special knowledge"
they think elevates them above everyone
else.
But scientists never invent new theories to become prominent and get >>>>> government grants?
You know that scientific grant requests
get previewed by other scientists, no?
And they are more trustworthy and have nothing to gain? It's
basically a club.
A very internally competitive club where the scientists try to find
flaws in
data, its acquistion, and the logic usually mathematical to reject the
new
theories. What they have to gain is the sharing of possibly accurate
data
and ideas. Generally until an experiment or data acquistion mode is
tested
in another laboratory it is not considered proven or the theory
relating to
it is considered for acceptance.
Yes that does happen, but what also happens is the establishments deride
and suppress discoveries that would ruin their narratives.
Much of the science debates that go on are also to distract the masses
and muddy the waters.
Yes it takes years to gain the skills necessary for scientific and/or
technological
research to be done but you would not be sitting whereever you are and
typ[ng into your computer if poeple did not no devote themselves to such
studies. I will remind you or inform you if you did not know that when I >> was young computers were mostly human beings who devoted themselves
to mathematics.
Computers then became gigantic electrical machines then electronic
machines which materials reseach managed to reduce to much handier
sizes. You are using the results of scientific research and many
theoretical
changes to communicate so yoiu should consider that seriously when
you come off with your half-baked ideas about science and scientists.
The establishments allowed computer tech, television tech etc.,
basically entertainment, mainly to occupy people with crap and video
games. Busy people don't ask questions. Governments hate questions.
Every ten years or so they throw out most of their theories and make >>>>> up new ones. But you still trust them that only they have the 'facts'. >>>>>
Bingo. That is where Nobel prizes come
from, disproving a previously held theory
with a new one, backed by evidence.
Thin evidence that's open to interpretation. But they get their
money. And Nobel prizes are another motivation and fame generator.
We
thought the world was static, then we
discovered plate techtonics, we thought
the moon was dead, then we discoved
moonquakes, we thought gravity was just
attractive, then we discovered it can
repel things. Ain't science grand?
So mainstream scientists used to be really dumb. Now they're less dumb.
Many ancient people knew more about the stars as depicted in wall art
than many later scientists.
The ancients built non-optical observatories to study the
heavens with the unaided eye.
But they had no idea of the nature of the Sun or of other stars as far
as we know. Some figured out the Earth was more spherical than
flat but no great knowlege of the stars but the knowlege of their
observation. Mostly they did observations to construct astrological
charts and to make sure of the Quarter-Days i.e. Eqinoxes and
Solstices. Which is what a lot of ancient monuments were constructed
to determine.
You don't know that. There is archaeological evidence that ancient
humans were contacted by advanced ETs who imparted advanced celestial knowledge, including energy generation, healing tech etc.
Dobie Gillis, is just awful. But Rocky and Bullwinkle is top notch. And
I've always had a thing for Natasha.
On Mon, 19 May 2025 11:43:03 -0700, BCFD 36 <bcfd36@cruzio.com> wrote:
Dobie Gillis, is just awful. But Rocky and Bullwinkle is top notch. And >>I've always had a thing for Natasha.
Perhaps, but if we didn't have Dobie Gillis we never would have gotten >Gilligan....
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 170:01:02 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,555 |