• (Reactor) Women Have Always Written SFF But

    From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 13 14:17:41 2025
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.

    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy-to-find/
    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Thomas Koenig@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Wed Aug 13 20:24:59 2025
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> schrieb:
    On 8/13/2025 9:17 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.

    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy-to-find/

    Not a single mention of Andre Norton in the article.

    And one mention of Marion Zimmer Bradley for her 1964 book "The Bloody
    Sun". I am impressed as I thought that her name was not to be mentioned
    in polite society anymore.

    Why?
    --
    This USENET posting was made without artificial intelligence,
    artificial impertinence, artificial arrogance, artificial stupidity,
    artificial flavorings or artificial colorants.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jay Morris@21:1/5 to Thomas Koenig on Wed Aug 13 16:20:31 2025
    On 8/13/2025 3:24 PM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
    And one mention of Marion Zimmer Bradley for her 1964 book "The Bloody
    Sun". I am impressed as I thought that her name was not to be mentioned
    in polite society anymore.
    Why?

    https://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/jun/27/sff-community-marion-zimmer-bradley-daughter-accuses-abuse

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Torbjorn Lindgren@21:1/5 to tkoenig@netcologne.de on Wed Aug 13 21:59:34 2025
    Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:
    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> schrieb:
    On 8/13/2025 9:17 AM, James Nicoll wrote:
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.

    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy-to-find/

    Not a single mention of Andre Norton in the article.

    And one mention of Marion Zimmer Bradley for her 1964 book "The Bloody
    Sun". I am impressed as I thought that her name was not to be mentioned
    in polite society anymore.

    Why?

    It's not like it's hard to find out. Even Wikipedia has far more than
    enough to unravel the rest of the story via multiple confirmed
    sources.

    The big change came when her daughter Moira (Greyland) with her first
    husband alleged in 2014 that that MZB and the first husband molested
    her as a child and she also alleged that MZB continued with this
    pattern with her second husband, Walter Breen.

    These were posthumous allegations (all three were long dead) and as
    such it's unlikely there was any real investigations done to try to
    prove anything but it needs to be seen in the light of her second
    husband (WB) was convicted of these kind of behavior well (1954)
    before the marriage (1964) and she's admitted that she was aware of
    this.

    There were significant, ahem, misgivings at the time about MZB
    potential role the "Breendoggle" (1963-1964) which led to Breen being
    banned from attending Pacificon II (24th Worldcon, 1964) before this
    2014 statement and many took this as confirmation.

    This gives the child abuse in the Avalon series a different "feel"
    even if it's probably historically accurate. And there's probably
    legal but potentially creepy teen with older love interests in other
    books in modern settings.

    MZB only heir is Elizabeth Waters that has publicly defended both
    Bradley and Breen, and claims that the Breen child molestation charges
    are likely false (which I suspect must also have been MZB's official
    stance). None of her children inherited anything, it all went to EW.

    Which to some is yet another reason to not contribute and/or read
    them.

    I had to look up some of the details to write this but I've heard the
    basic outline long ago despite my only contact being some of the Sword
    and Sorceress anthologies she edited - to "redress the lack of strong
    female protagonists in the subgenre" !? (from foreword of the first one).

    Make what you want of this, it's certainly what I would consider "well
    known". Personally I tend to believe Moira Greyland, there's no
    benefit for her to lie about this and there's so many other warning
    signs too.

    Walter Breen died in prison serving a 10 year term and was convicted
    multiple times for related crimes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bobbie Sellers@21:1/5 to William Hyde on Wed Aug 13 14:59:38 2025
    On 8/13/25 14:41, William Hyde wrote:
    James Nicoll wrote:
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.
    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-
    always-easy-to-find/

    I never felt that SF was a male field. Even though most of the authors I
    read were indeed men.

    I was about ten when I discovered that Andre Norton was a girl.  I knew
    full well that it was immoral and wrong to enjoy anything by girls but I
    had already read two of her novels and morality went out the window. I yielded to temptation.

    I also knew that my friends would rag me ceaselessly if they discovered
    that I was reading a book by a girl, but I decided that, as illiterate
    thugs, they'd never find out.

    Shortly after came CL Moore, Judith Merril, Anne Mcaffrey (pre-Pern),
    LeGuin, the female writers in DV, and so on.

    I knew that women could write under men's names, or quasi-hide their
    gender with initials, and for that matter that men could write under
    women's names.  When buying an SF book by an author new to me my only question was whether or not I had the money.  Nothing else mattered
    except in those rare cases when the blurb told me not to read this book.

    Octavia Butler, Tanya Huff, and names that do not leap to the front of my
    out of warranty brain. I would read everything unless the blurb told me
    it was
    not my choice. That was when I was able to work for a living and after that
    I changed my habits from book stores to the Public Libraries.



    And many thanks to those blurb writers.

    Sometimes they were helpful

    William Hyde

    bliss

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to naddy@mips.inka.de on Wed Aug 13 23:00:51 2025
    In article <slrn109q1pj.2mnk.naddy@lorvorc.mips.inka.de>,
    Christian Weisgerber <naddy@mips.inka.de> wrote:
    On 2025-08-13, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:

    And one mention of Marion Zimmer Bradley for her 1964 book "The Bloody
    Sun". I am impressed as I thought that her name was not to be mentioned >>> in polite society anymore.

    For the record, Bradley is mentioned because her book was one of the books mentioned in the review I discussed.

    Why?

    | Though Bradley remained popular during her lifetime, her reputation
    | was posthumously marred when in 2014 her daughter reported that
    | Bradley had sexually abused her, and allegedly assisted her second
    | husband, convicted child abuser Walter Breen, in his own grooming
    | and sexual abuse of multiple unrelated children.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_Zimmer_Bradley

    The MZB thing was a bit bizarre.

    In the 1960s, there was the Breendoggle, about barring MZB's husband
    Breen because he was a child molester. But then people seemed to forget
    about it. It certainly didn't impeded MZB's career or cult of personality.

    Then Breen got arrested, tried, and sent to prison for molesting kids.
    That also didn't kneecap MZB's career.

    Around 1999, there was a firestorm about what she knew, based on her
    testimony, started by Stephen Goldin, stepfather of one of the victims.
    Then, it was like everyone agreed to forget it*.

    Then, in 2014 Tor Dot Com did a ... birthday piece on her, I think.
    Moen pointed out MZB's unpleasant record in comments. Cue firestorm.
    Then her daughter came forward. This time it struck. Of course, she'd
    been dead for 15 years so it's not like it was a huge inconvenience.

    Even then, Marion Zimmer Bradley's Sword and Sorceress kept her
    on the cover until 2023...

    * I did comment to my boss that it was pretty creepy that the
    book she dedicated to Breen was the one with the child molester
    who can't be touched subplot.
    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Christian Weisgerber@21:1/5 to Thomas Koenig on Wed Aug 13 21:44:19 2025
    On 2025-08-13, Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> wrote:

    And one mention of Marion Zimmer Bradley for her 1964 book "The Bloody
    Sun". I am impressed as I thought that her name was not to be mentioned
    in polite society anymore.

    Why?

    | Though Bradley remained popular during her lifetime, her reputation
    | was posthumously marred when in 2014 her daughter reported that
    | Bradley had sexually abused her, and allegedly assisted her second
    | husband, convicted child abuser Walter Breen, in his own grooming
    | and sexual abuse of multiple unrelated children. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marion_Zimmer_Bradley

    --
    Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robert Woodward@21:1/5 to James Nicoll on Wed Aug 13 22:13:32 2025
    In article <107i6q5$opg$1@reader1.panix.com>,
    jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) wrote:

    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.

    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy-
    to-find/

    Kristine Kathryn Rusch's introduction to her anthology _Women of Futures
    Past_ (Published in 2016 by Baen Books) went into some length on this
    problem. I know that you have been ignoring Baen, but her introduction
    is still present in the sample pages for the electronic version, see <https://www.baen.com/Chapters/9781476781617/9781476781617.htm>, for
    anybody to read.

    --
    "We have advanced to new and surprising levels of bafflement."
    Imperial Auditor Miles Vorkosigan describes progress in _Komarr_. ‹-----------------------------------------------------
    Robert Woodward robertaw@drizzle.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to robertaw@drizzle.com on Thu Aug 14 13:34:42 2025
    In article <robertaw-7A21D4.22133213082025@news.individual.net>,
    Robert Woodward <robertaw@drizzle.com> wrote:
    In article <107i6q5$opg$1@reader1.panix.com>,
    jdnicoll@panix.com (James Nicoll) wrote:

    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.

    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy- >> to-find/

    Kristine Kathryn Rusch's introduction to her anthology _Women of Futures >Past_ (Published in 2016 by Baen Books) went into some length on this >problem. I know that you have been ignoring Baen, but her introduction
    is still present in the sample pages for the electronic version, see ><https://www.baen.com/Chapters/9781476781617/9781476781617.htm>, for
    anybody to read.

    Interesting read, thanks.

    She relies on Davin, who on the one hand actually did the tedious
    bean counting of going through old magazines, but whose interpretations
    can be questionable.

    There's also this detail, a quotation from Willis:

    "The field didn't just have women writers--it had really good women
    writers. These were wonderful stories, and I don't believe they were
    overlooked at the time, because when I read them, they were all in
    Year's Best collections."

    Rusch speculates Willis was reading Merril's best ofs. However,
    Rusch says she only did spot-checks but I've actually read Merril's
    complete run, recently:

    https://jamesdavisnicoll.com/reviews/project/judith-merrils-the-years-greatest-science-fiction-and-fantasy

    Merril cast her net very widely, drawing from outside conventional
    SF and also the conventional definition of a calendar year. She didn't particularly anthologize stories by women. If Willis was reading stories
    by women in the Best SF annuals, she wasn't doing it in Willis. So,
    what else was there?

    Bleiler and Dikty had a series from 1949 to 1957.

    Wolheim and Carr for Ace Books from 1965-71

    Harry Harrison and Brian Aldiss did a series from 1967 to 1975.

    The ISFDB is down right now but I will go check later today to
    see if Willis meant the non-Merril Best SF.
    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to All on Thu Aug 14 15:14:12 2025
    OK, I think I know what Best SF Willis meant:

    The Best from Fantasy and Science Fiction. Specifically, Boucher's run.

    (Guess two would have been something edited by Goldsmith but she does
    not appear to have edited anthologies)
    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to Michael F. Stemper on Thu Aug 14 19:45:45 2025
    In article <107lacl$l8g9$1@dont-email.me>,
    Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 13/08/2025 16.41, William Hyde wrote:
    James Nicoll wrote:
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.
    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy-to-find/

    I never felt that SF was a male field. Even though most of the
    authors I read were indeed men.

    I was about ten when I discovered that Andre Norton was a girl.  I
    knew full well that it was immoral and wrong to enjoy anything by girls
    but I had already read two of her novels and morality went out the
    window. I yielded to temptation.

    I was about ten when I discovered Andre Norton, period. I read
    her stuff for a year or two before I discovered that "Andre"
    wasn't typically a "girl's" name. I knew of a total of one
    "Andre" -- her.

    I still didn't get why she wanted to hide the fact that she was
    a "girl". She was the first author that I sought out by name
    (as opposed to series).

    Because she was targeting a male audience and she felt boys would
    not buy from a woman author.

    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stephen Harker@21:1/5 to Michael F. Stemper on Fri Aug 15 07:10:47 2025
    "Michael F. Stemper" <michael.stemper@gmail.com> writes:

    On 14/08/2025 14.45, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <107lacl$l8g9$1@dont-email.me>,
    Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 13/08/2025 16.41, William Hyde wrote:

    I was about ten when I discovered that Andre Norton was a girl.  I
    knew full well that it was immoral and wrong to enjoy anything by girls
    but I had already read two of her novels and morality went out the
    window. I yielded to temptation.

    I was about ten when I discovered Andre Norton, period. I read
    her stuff for a year or two before I discovered that "Andre"
    wasn't typically a "girl's" name. I knew of a total of one
    "Andre" -- her.

    I still didn't get why she wanted to hide the fact that she was
    a "girl". She was the first author that I sought out by name
    (as opposed to series).
    Because she was targeting a male audience and she felt boys would
    not buy from a woman author.

    Yes, sixty years later, I understand that. In fact, I probably
    understood it twenty years later. When I said "I still didn't get
    why ...", I was referring to when I was a ten-twelve-year-old boy.


    Interesting to read the range of similar responses. I was ten a bit
    before 1970 and had no problem with female authors as I had been reading (non-SF) authors such as Rosemary Sutcliff (Eagle of the Ninth and many others), Edith Nesbit (The Railway Children, The Treasure Seekers and
    many others), D K Broster (The Gleam in the North and others). These
    were known to be women authors. I don't know when I found out that Andre Norton was a woman, but it did not impact my reading decisions.

    Partly a change with time and possibly the subject matter (I was
    particularly interested in historical fiction) as well as SF.

    --
    Stephen Harker sjharker@aussiebroadband.com.au

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From James Nicoll@21:1/5 to wthyde1953@gmail.com on Thu Aug 14 22:02:00 2025
    In article <107ljc6$o30t$1@dont-email.me>,
    William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> wrote:

    Luckily we did have Norton on the spinner racks, as there was no
    bookstore for miles and the bookmobile, unaccountably, did not have all
    her works.

    If I could meet the guy who ran the local variety store I'd thank him.
    He had far more SF on his rack than usual. A few years later it was
    75% porn, 25% romance. New owners.

    Hub Variety in downtown Waterloo had a solid SF section. I remember the
    owner. He had terrible vision and had to use a special magnifier to
    see the prices.



    --
    My reviews can be found at http://jamesdavisnicoll.com/
    My tor pieces at https://www.tor.com/author/james-davis-nicoll/
    My Dreamwidth at https://james-davis-nicoll.dreamwidth.org/
    My patreon is at https://www.patreon.com/jamesdnicoll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Titus G@21:1/5 to James Nicoll on Fri Aug 15 12:59:14 2025
    On 15/08/25 07:45, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <107lacl$l8g9$1@dont-email.me>,
    Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 13/08/2025 16.41, William Hyde wrote:
    James Nicoll wrote:
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.

    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy-to-find/

    I never felt that SF was a male field. Even though most of the
    authors I read were indeed men.

    I was about ten when I discovered that Andre Norton was a girl.  I
    knew full well that it was immoral and wrong to enjoy anything by girls
    but I had already read two of her novels and morality went out the
    window. I yielded to temptation.

    I was about ten when I discovered Andre Norton, period. I read
    her stuff for a year or two before I discovered that "Andre"
    wasn't typically a "girl's" name. I knew of a total of one
    "Andre" -- her.

    I still didn't get why she wanted to hide the fact that she was
    a "girl". She was the first author that I sought out by name
    (as opposed to series).

    Because she was targeting a male audience and she felt boys would
    not buy from a woman author.


    When I was a sexist, teenaged boy, I had no money for books so used the
    public library. I read only the books, nothing about the authors and I
    had no idea that I read and enjoyed female SF authors. I was
    successfully targeted by the yellow covers with black writing. Enid
    Blyton was a ubiquitous female author whom I had outgrown.
    More recently, Ann Leckie, Eleanor Catton, Arkady Martine and Susanna
    Clarke have joined my all time favourite authors.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Lurndal@21:1/5 to Titus G on Fri Aug 15 15:26:43 2025
    Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> writes:
    On 15/08/25 07:45, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <107lacl$l8g9$1@dont-email.me>,
    Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 13/08/2025 16.41, William Hyde wrote:
    James Nicoll wrote:
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick
    was finding their work.

    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy-to-find/

    I never felt that SF was a male field. Even though most of the
    authors I read were indeed men.

    I was about ten when I discovered that Andre Norton was a girl.  I
    knew full well that it was immoral and wrong to enjoy anything by girls
    but I had already read two of her novels and morality went out the
    window. I yielded to temptation.

    I was about ten when I discovered Andre Norton, period. I read
    her stuff for a year or two before I discovered that "Andre"
    wasn't typically a "girl's" name. I knew of a total of one
    "Andre" -- her.

    I still didn't get why she wanted to hide the fact that she was
    a "girl". She was the first author that I sought out by name
    (as opposed to series).

    Because she was targeting a male audience and she felt boys would
    not buy from a woman author.


    When I was a sexist, teenaged boy, I had no money for books so used the >public library. I read only the books, nothing about the authors and I
    had no idea that I read and enjoyed female SF authors.

    Indeed. My 9th grade librarian turned me on to
    _The Crystal Cave_ and the gender of the author
    was completely irrelevent. I wasn't much interested
    in her romance stuff, however. I still re-read the
    first two Merlin books every couple of years.

    Like most here, I wasn't aware (nor would I have cared)
    of Andre Norton's gender.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Don_from_AZ@21:1/5 to Scott Lurndal on Fri Aug 15 19:34:03 2025
    scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

    Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> writes:
    On 15/08/25 07:45, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <107lacl$l8g9$1@dont-email.me>,
    Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 13/08/2025 16.41, William Hyde wrote:
    James Nicoll wrote:
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick >>>>>> was finding their work.

    https://reactormag.com/women-have-always-written-sff-but-it-wasnt-always-easy-to-find/

    I never felt that SF was a male field. Even though most of the
    authors I read were indeed men.

    I was about ten when I discovered that Andre Norton was a girl.  I >>>> knew full well that it was immoral and wrong to enjoy anything by girls >>>> but I had already read two of her novels and morality went out the
    window. I yielded to temptation.

    I was about ten when I discovered Andre Norton, period. I read
    her stuff for a year or two before I discovered that "Andre"
    wasn't typically a "girl's" name. I knew of a total of one
    "Andre" -- her.

    I still didn't get why she wanted to hide the fact that she was
    a "girl". She was the first author that I sought out by name
    (as opposed to series).

    Because she was targeting a male audience and she felt boys would
    not buy from a woman author.


    When I was a sexist, teenaged boy, I had no money for books so used the >>public library. I read only the books, nothing about the authors and I
    had no idea that I read and enjoyed female SF authors.

    Indeed. My 9th grade librarian turned me on to
    _The Crystal Cave_ and the gender of the author
    was completely irrelevent. I wasn't much interested
    in her romance stuff, however. I still re-read the
    first two Merlin books every couple of years.

    Like most here, I wasn't aware (nor would I have cared)
    of Andre Norton's gender.

    Nor was I aware of her gender until I had read and enjoyed a number of
    her books, particularly the Ad Astra series and the Star Guard/Star
    Ranger duology. I was and still am more science fiction oriented than
    fantasy, so I have not read the Witch World and other fantasy series of
    hers, but of those I have read, I don't think her gender made any
    difference to her writing skills.

    Speaking of _The Crystal Cave_, I first encountered this on a summer
    vacation quite a few years ago and vastly enjoyed it. I had no idea that
    Mary Stewart was best known for romantic suspense novels. I sought out
    the rest of the books in the series:

    The Crystal Cave (1970)
    The Hollow Hills (1973)
    The Last Enchantment (1979)
    The Wicked Day (1983)

    and loved them all, even though _The Wicked Day_ was kind of a downer,
    dealing as it does with Arthur's betrayal and fall.

    In looking up the names of the books, I just found out that there is a
    fifth book:

    The Prince and the Pilgrim (1995)

    which I will probably seek out and read, maybe with a reread of the
    entire Arthurian cycle.

    In any case, I don't think I've ever paid much attention, or judged a
    book by, whether the author was male or female.

    --
    -Don_from_AZ-

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Stephen Harker@21:1/5 to djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid on Mon Aug 18 12:43:07 2025
    Don_from_AZ <djatechNOSPAM@comcast.net.invalid> writes:

    scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:

    Titus G <noone@nowhere.com> writes:
    On 15/08/25 07:45, James Nicoll wrote:
    In article <107lacl$l8g9$1@dont-email.me>,
    Michael F. Stemper <michael.stemper@gmail.com> wrote:
    On 13/08/2025 16.41, William Hyde wrote:
    James Nicoll wrote:
    Women Have Always Written SFF But It Wasn't Always Easy to Find

    In the 1970s, many of the best new authors were women -- the trick >>>>>>> was finding their work.
    Nor was I aware of her gender until I had read and enjoyed a number of
    her books, particularly the Ad Astra series and the Star Guard/Star
    Ranger duology. I was and still am more science fiction oriented than fantasy, so I have not read the Witch World and other fantasy series of
    hers, but of those I have read, I don't think her gender made any
    difference to her writing skills.

    Speaking of _The Crystal Cave_, I first encountered this on a summer
    vacation quite a few years ago and vastly enjoyed it. I had no idea that
    Mary Stewart was best known for romantic suspense novels. I sought out
    the rest of the books in the series:

    The Crystal Cave (1970)
    The Hollow Hills (1973)
    The Last Enchantment (1979)
    The Wicked Day (1983)

    and loved them all, even though _The Wicked Day_ was kind of a downer, dealing as it does with Arthur's betrayal and fall.

    I read these as the came out, whether from the public library or copies
    from other members of the family (I read most Arthur related historical
    fiction I could find). Like you I enjoyed them all (and a few of the
    romantic suspence novels you mentioned that were around the house). Many
    of the copies I have belonged to my mother.

    In looking up the names of the books, I just found out that there is a
    fifth book:

    The Prince and the Pilgrim (1995)

    My mother had that one, so I read iwhen visiting Melbourne some time in
    the 1990's and staying at her place. I have re-read them on occasion.

    --
    Stephen Harker sjharker@aussiebroadband.com.au

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)