The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use as an
echo chamber to play your broken record, over and over again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads here
with your standard inane response to everything.
In article <xn0p1gkwk4fbeig001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use as an
echo chamber to play your broken record, over and over
again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads here
with your standard inane response to everything.
All true and tried Doctor Who Fans know The Timeless Child
has no place in Doctor Who!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1gkwk4fbeig001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use as an
echo chamber to play your broken record, over and over
again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads here
with your standard inane response to everything.
All true and tried Doctor Who Fans know The Timeless Child
has no place in Doctor Who!
That's a different issue Dave... I never said I liked it... I
said that it won't be retconned.
Like the rest of the things in "Doctor Who" that I don't
particularly like, I just ignore it. There's no need to waste
energy on something that you have no control over. - Control the >controllables!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1gkwk4fbeig001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use as an
echo chamber to play your broken record, over and over
again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads here
with your standard inane response to everything.
All true and tried Doctor Who Fans know The Timeless Child
has no place in Doctor Who!
That's a different issue Dave... I never said I liked it... I
said that it won't be retconned.
Like the rest of the things in "Doctor Who" that I don't
particularly like, I just ignore it. There's no need to waste
energy on something that you have no control over. - Control the controllables!
On 2025-01-31 8:07 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1gkwk4fbeig001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use
as an echo chamber to play your broken record, over and
over again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads
here with your standard inane response to everything.
All true and tried Doctor Who Fans know The Timeless Child
has no place in Doctor Who!
That's a different issue Dave... I never said I liked it... I
said that it won't be retconned.
Like the rest of the things in "Doctor Who" that I don't
particularly like, I just ignore it. There's no need to waste
energy on something that you have no control over. - Control
the controllables!
Time to "retcon" NotKnow and solve the spamming of Usenet
forever.
Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-01-31 8:07 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1gkwk4fbeig001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use
as an echo chamber to play your broken record, over and
over again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads
here with your standard inane response to everything.
All true and tried Doctor Who Fans know The Timeless Child
has no place in Doctor Who!
That's a different issue Dave... I never said I liked it... I
said that it won't be retconned.
Like the rest of the things in "Doctor Who" that I don't
particularly like, I just ignore it. There's no need to waste
energy on something that you have no control over. - Control
the controllables!
Time to "retcon" NotKnow and solve the spamming of Usenet
forever.
Save the Internet! Retcon NotKnow!
In article <xn0p1jcd35sh27g002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Save the Internet! Retcon NotKnow!
New knock coming against BS!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1jcd35sh27g002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Save the Internet! Retcon NotKnow!
New knock coming against BS!
<shrugs> Well, I thought it was funny anyway...
Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-01-31 8:07 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1gkwk4fbeig001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use
as an echo chamber to play your broken record, over and
over again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads
here with your standard inane response to everything.
All true and tried Doctor Who Fans know The Timeless Child
has no place in Doctor Who!
That's a different issue Dave... I never said I liked it... I
said that it won't be retconned.
Like the rest of the things in "Doctor Who" that I don't
particularly like, I just ignore it. There's no need to waste
energy on something that you have no control over. - Control
the controllables!
Time to "retcon" NotKnow and solve the spamming of Usenet
forever.
Save the Internet! Retcon NotKnow!
Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-01-31 8:07 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1gkwk4fbeig001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use
as an echo chamber to play your broken record, over and
over again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads
here with your standard inane response to everything.
All true and tried Doctor Who Fans know The Timeless Child
has no place in Doctor Who!
That's a different issue Dave... I never said I liked it... I
said that it won't be retconned.
Like the rest of the things in "Doctor Who" that I don't
particularly like, I just ignore it. There's no need to waste
energy on something that you have no control over. - Control
the controllables!
Time to "retcon" NotKnow and solve the spamming of Usenet
forever.
Save the Internet! Retcon NotKnow!
On 2/1/2025 07:18, Blueshirt wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-01-31 8:07 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p1gkwk4fbeig001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Save Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Now Dave, you've got your own thread which you can use
as an echo chamber to play your broken record, over and
over again...
Now there's no need to pollute all of the other threads
here with your standard inane response to everything.
All true and tried Doctor Who Fans know The Timeless Child
has no place in Doctor Who!
That's a different issue Dave... I never said I liked it... I
said that it won't be retconned.
Like the rest of the things in "Doctor Who" that I don't
particularly like, I just ignore it. There's no need to waste
energy on something that you have no control over. - Control
the controllables!
Time to "retcon" NotKnow and solve the spamming of Usenet
forever.
Save the Internet! Retcon NotKnow!
NotKnow cant' be retconed...just pull the plug!
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <zkvnP.96971$rI92.74790@fx04.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2025 07:18, Blueshirt wrote:
Save the Internet! Retcon NotKnow!
NotKnow cant' be retconed...just pull the plug!
Care for a shock?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <zkvnP.96971$rI92.74790@fx04.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 2/1/2025 07:18, Blueshirt wrote:
Save the Internet! Retcon NotKnow!
NotKnow cant' be retconed...just pull the plug!
Care for a shock?
I see what you did there! :-)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 170:20:22 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,557 |