In article <vpuu73$7fn6$1@dont-email.me>,part > > part of tonight Gospel struck a cord with me.
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
I thought I was the restored Reader for Mass tonight (WRONG
... Next Saturday!!) but, Binky, it must have been "Devine
Intervention" that I was there, tonight, listening to the
Readings (rather than actually reading the Readings) and
Luke 6, 39 - 45
[Religious mumbo jumbo snipped]
[Yet more religious mumbo jumbo snipped]
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic >rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10,
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different beliefs,
and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
On 3/1/2025 21:14, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10,
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
Yes, you are correct. The point I was trying to make was that St.
Peter was charged by Jesus to start what was the original Christian
Church (the term Catholic meaning "universal"). I'm also aware that in
the early stages of this set-up, there were people who wanted to carry
on the tenets and beliefs of Judaism...and just add the acknowledgement
that Jesus Christ is the messiah they had been waiting for.
Dave, or anyone else for that matter, making comments regarding the
Catholic Church that go beyond disagreements on interpretation or
beliefs is being prejudicial; how can the first Christian Church not be
a "true" Christian Church? Because the Catholic Church doesn't use the
KJV Bible? That line of thinking is crazy talk.
Calling the NIV Bible, as Dave called it, "Satanic, Anti-Christian,
Humanist" is just as bad. That kind of logic is mind blowing.
It's like in my line of work...high school band director. In my state,
there are two popular schools of thought regarding ensemble tuning and balance of characteristic sounds. They are both equally valid
approaches to getting a band to play with good sounds. However, when
you apply for a job, many schools will ask which approach you prefer to teach. If you respond with the "wrong" method, you don't get the job.
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
REcall Satan can impersonate God.
Of course, most sensible people think that they're all "Bogus" but I
won't de-rail this happy religious thread with common sense and
logic... a lot of people who believe in that alien from outer space
- that supposedly created this world
- seem to have trouble with that sort of thing.
The Doctor wrote:
REcall Satan can impersonate God.
I know, I do it often...
On 2/03/2025 2:53 am, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Of course, most sensible people think that they're all
"Bogus" but I won't de-rail this happy religious thread with
common sense and logic... a lot of people who believe in
that alien from outer space
No! No, Blueshirt, we are not discussing The Klingons, The
Ferengi nor The Vulcans!!
- that supposedly created this world
No, they all want to blow Earth up!!
On 3/1/2025 21:14, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:Yes, you are correct. The point I was trying to make was that St. Peter
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10,
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different beliefs,
and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
was charged by Jesus to start what was the original Christian Church
(the term Catholic meaning "universal"). I'm also aware that in the
early stages of this set-up, there were people who wanted to carry on
the tenets and beliefs of Judaism...and just add the acknowledgement
that Jesus Christ is the messiah they had been waiting for.
Dave, or anyone else for that matter, making comments regarding the
Catholic Church that go beyond disagreements on interpretation or
beliefs is being prejudicial; how can the first Christian Church not be
a "true" Christian Church? Because the Catholic Church doesn't use the
KJV Bible? That line of thinking is crazy talk. Calling the NIV Bible,
as Dave called it, "Satanic, Anti-Christian, Humanist" is just as bad.
That kind of logic is mind blowing.
It's like in my line of work...high school band director. In my state,
there are two popular schools of thought regarding ensemble tuning and >balance of characteristic sounds. They are both equally valid
approaches to getting a band to play with good sounds. However, when
you apply for a job, many schools will ask which approach you prefer to >teach. If you respond with the "wrong" method, you don't get the job.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
On 2/03/2025 2:53 am, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Of course, most sensible people think that they're all "Bogus" but I
won't de-rail this happy religious thread with common sense and
logic... a lot of people who believe in that alien from outer space
No! No, Blueshirt, we are not discussing The Klingons, The Ferengi nor
The Vulcans!!
- that supposedly created this world
No, they all want to blow Earth up!!
- seem to have trouble with that sort of thing.--
Daniel70
On 2/03/2025 8:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:.... and MY Footy team is way better than yours!! ;-P
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
Amounts to about the same thing.
--
Daniel70
On 2/03/2025 2:53 am, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Of course, most sensible people think that they're all "Bogus" but I
won't de-rail this happy religious thread with common sense and
logic... a lot of people who believe in that alien from outer space
No! No, Blueshirt, we are not discussing The Klingons, The Ferengi nor
The Vulcans!!
- that supposedly created this world
No, they all want to blow Earth up!!
- seem to have trouble with that sort of thing.
In article <vq1l5n$pm9v$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/03/2025 8:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:.... and MY Footy team is way better than yours!! ;-P
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
Can they beat ARsenal FC, the Best UEFA Team.
On 3/03/2025 12:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq1l5n$pm9v$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
.... and MY Footy team is way better than yours!!
Can they beat ARsenal FC, the Best UEFA Team.
Who the FUCK is UEFA and what position does he play??
Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity",
Binky??
First there was Jesus ....
Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/03/2025 12:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq1l5n$pm9v$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
.... and MY Footy team is way better than yours!!
Can they beat ARsenal FC, the Best UEFA Team.
Who the F*K is UEFA and what position does he play??
No Daniel, it's "Who the f*k are Arsenal and what do they ever
win?!"
Daniel70 wrote:
Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity",
Binky??
First there was Jesus ....
You do know that Jesus wasn't actually a Christian, let alone
the first Christian, right?
If he existed... he was born, lived and died a Jew. His--
followers were the Christians as they followed his teachings.
On 2025-03-03 5:59 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
Binky thinks the term "Binky" refers to a paedophile BECAUSE
HIS BIBLE STUDIES TOLD HIM SO!!
WOW!! What a great reference!! I wonder WHY a Bible studies
course would NEED to tell ANYONE what a "paedophile" is!!
I wonder how binky knows the "secret" language of paedophiles?
Actually I suspect the idiot is attempting to "shame" people
that call him binky with his fantasy of "secret codes".
As for the Bible studies he was too lazy to edit the subject
line properly.
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
On 4/03/2025 10:52 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's
only hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of
course.
.... but .... but ..... but my Bible lists the lineage!! ;-P
On 3/4/2025 05:38, Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:06 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq492t$1ajkd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
WOW!! What a great reference!! I wonder WHY a Bible
studies course would NEED to tell ANYONE what a
"paedophile" is!!
Leviticus and numbers
BTW now Paedophile uses the word binky is the same way
homosexuals corrupts the waord gay.
OH!! Do "they", Binky?? I can't say I've ever heard any
homosexuals use that word!! As my Nephew IS a Homosexual,
I'll have to ask him if he knows whats the word "Binky"
means.
My niece is bi-sexual, and her roommate is (was?) a woman who
transitioned to a male. I'll have to ask them as well.
Mind you I have never met a paedophile like binky seems to
have, it seems he has met a lot of paedophiles, maybe he
should find new "friends" to hang with?
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims
that it's almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or
Irish grandparents to NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...
BTW now Paedophile uses the word binky is the same way
homosexuals corrupts the waord gay.
OH!! Do "they", Binky?? I can't say I've ever heard any
homosexuals use that word!! As my Nephew IS a Homosexual,
I'll have to ask him if he knows whats the word "Binky"
means.
My niece is bi-sexual, and her roommate is (was?) a woman who
transitioned to a male. I'll have to ask them as well.
Don't! Without an understanding of RADW they'll just think you
are some sort of lunatic.
Nothing that goes on here could be explained sensibly to the
outside world!
The first rule of RADW is...
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
And a descendant of King David.Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of King David. Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to Mary
(NOT
Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special about
being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand years earlier.
(There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims that it's
almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or Irish grandparents to
NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...)
Idlehands wrote:
Mind you I have never met a paedophile like binky seems to
have, it seems he has met a lot of paedophiles, maybe he
should find new "friends" to hang with?
Is that hang, as in, with a noose?
Probably a bit harsh, but it would certainly cure his unhealthy
obsession with paedophiles...
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/4/2025 05:38, Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:06 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq492t$1ajkd$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
WOW!! What a great reference!! I wonder WHY a Bible
studies course would NEED to tell ANYONE what a
"paedophile" is!!
Leviticus and numbers
BTW now Paedophile uses the word binky is the same way
homosexuals corrupts the waord gay.
OH!! Do "they", Binky?? I can't say I've ever heard any
homosexuals use that word!! As my Nephew IS a Homosexual,
I'll have to ask him if he knows whats the word "Binky"
means.
My niece is bi-sexual, and her roommate is (was?) a woman who
transitioned to a male. I'll have to ask them as well.
Don't! Without an understanding of RADW they'll just think you
are some sort of lunatic.
Nothing that goes on here could be explained sensibly to the
outside world!
The first rule of RADW is...
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 10:52 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:.... but .... but ..... but my Bible lists the lineage!! ;-P
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's
only hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of
course.
My bible doesn't... so YOUR bible is fake and Satanist!
Until I see it written in MY accepted version of the bible - The
Blueshirt Revised Version (BRV) - then it's not true.
The Last Doctor wrote:
There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims
that it's almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or
Irish grandparents to NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...
I'm related to royalty? Wow! Now I know what it means to be the
crowned one!
I loved my great (x375) Grandad Teddy, he was a great King. Much
better than that big-eared Charlie fella.
It's okay though folks, I won't let it go to my head... you can
still call me Blueshirt. There's no need to bother with the
Prince bit...
In article <xn0p2wu0fa8fl9p000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
I don't know if Mike is saying that but I'll happy butt in
and say, yes I think the bible is full of lies.
And you can quote me on that!!!
No wonder you are not mentally functional BS!
On 2025-03-06 2:47 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/03/2025 1:39 am, The Doctor wrote:
Check it out in edm.general . You will note a post
from the 2005+ there.
'2005'!! You don't hold a grudge, much, do YOU, Binky??
Would that be the post where binky dreams of castrating
homosexuals?
Christ are fourteen generations.
Oh!! No!! Binky, which bit of The Bible do we believe??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ but, then,
Verse 17 states there were only 28 Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the statement of
(14 + 14) 28 Generations??
Daniel70 wrote:
Christ are fourteen generations.
Oh!! No!! Binky, which bit of The Bible do we believe??
How about, none of it?
Life is so much easier that way.
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ but, then,
Verse 17 states there were only 28 Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the statement of
(14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ but,
then, Verse 17 states there were only 28 Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the statement of
(14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
"BRV"??
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ but,
then, Verse 17 states there were only 28 Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the statement of
(14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
<face palm> Somebody clearly wasn't paying attention!
No wonder you can sit through an Agatha Christie play and not
know who did it at the end!
On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ
but, then, Verse 17 states there were only 28
Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the
statement of (14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
"BRV"??
<face palm> Somebody clearly wasn't paying attention!
No wonder you can sit through an Agatha Christie play and not
know who did it at the end!
"BRV"??
On 8/03/2025 9:22 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Yes, the BRV...!!!
You could re-read this thread again, properly... or try and
work it out using your little grey cells.
[Clue] It's on topic for this thread and if you think about
it it's a lot easier to work out than who killed the people
in "And Then There Were None".
So is 'BRV' a reference to 'Binky Regal Version'??
Or, maybe, 'Blueshirt Revised Version'??
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ
but, then, Verse 17 states there were only 28
Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the
statement of (14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
<face palm> Somebody clearly wasn't paying attention!
No wonder you can sit through an Agatha Christie play and not
know who did it at the end!
Yes, the BRV...!!!
You could re-read this thread again, properly... or try and work
it out using your little grey cells.
[Clue] It's on topic for this thread and if you think about it
it's a lot easier to work out than who killed the people in "And
Then There Were None".
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 9:22 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
So is 'BRV' a reference to 'Binky Regal Version'??
Yes, the BRV...!!!
You could re-read this thread again, properly... or try and
work it out using your little grey cells.
[Clue] It's on topic for this thread and if you think about
it it's a lot easier to work out than who killed the people
in "And Then There Were None".
Not quite.
Or, maybe, 'Blueshirt Revised Version'??
Bingo!
Well done. <claps>
See, you can do it if you try... :-)
On 8/03/2025 11:32 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Or, maybe, 'Blueshirt Revised Version'??
Bingo!
However, one could wonder why SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE in
The Bible's story would have thier own version of The Bible!!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 36:09:48 |
| Calls: | 10,392 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,152 |