On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10,
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the Church
up? Deflecting again, I see.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 2025-03-02 05:00:49 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 21:14, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10,
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian >>>> Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity. >>>
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
Yes, you are correct. The point I was trying to make was that St.
Peter was charged by Jesus to start what was the original Christian
Church (the term Catholic meaning "universal"). I'm also aware that in
the early stages of this set-up, there were people who wanted to carry
on the tenets and beliefs of Judaism...and just add the acknowledgement
that Jesus Christ is the messiah they had been waiting for.
Dave, or anyone else for that matter, making comments regarding the
Catholic Church that go beyond disagreements on interpretation or
beliefs is being prejudicial; how can the first Christian Church not be
a "true" Christian Church? Because the Catholic Church doesn't use the
KJV Bible? That line of thinking is crazy talk.
*ALL* religions are "crazy talk". They're all just a load of complete
bovine excrement that should be well past their use-by-date in a
supposed intelligent modern society. The fact that any of them still
exist is beyond any sensible comprehension.
But if fools want to believe such nonsense preached at them by greedy
con-men in the 'church', then that's up to them, as long as they do not
go around trying to "convert" nor causing problems for any other
people. The fact that so many wars and deaths have been caused by these >supposed "good" people fighting about whose mythical superbeing is
better than someone else's mythical superbeing, simply proves that the
human race has still not reached the heights of real intelligence yet. >Especially when you consider most silly religions have a specific rule
about not harming others!!
Calling the NIV Bible, as Dave called it, "Satanic, Anti-Christian,
Humanist" is just as bad. That kind of logic is mind blowing.
It's like in my line of work...high school band director. In my state,
there are two popular schools of thought regarding ensemble tuning and
balance of characteristic sounds. They are both equally valid
approaches to getting a band to play with good sounds. However, when
you apply for a job, many schools will ask which approach you prefer to
teach. If you respond with the "wrong" method, you don't get the job.
In article <vq0ieq$geml$1@dont-email.me>,
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10,
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
Too old pagans infiltrated Christianity impurifying Christianity.
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
Daniel70 wrote:
On 2/03/2025 2:53 am, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Of course, most sensible people think that they're all
"Bogus" but I won't de-rail this happy religious thread with
common sense and logic... a lot of people who believe in
that alien from outer space
No! No, Blueshirt, we are not discussing The Klingons, The
Ferengi nor The Vulcans!!
C'mon, you could have done better than that! This isn't a Star
Trek newsgroup.
Daleks, Cybermen and Sontarans would have been more apt.
- that supposedly created this world
No, they all want to blow Earth up!!
It's all fiction whatever way you want to look at it.
On 2/03/2025 11:41 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted ^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <vq0ieq$geml$1@dont-email.me>,Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity", Binky??
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10,
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian >>>> Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity. >>>
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
Too old pagans infiltrated Christianity impurifying Christianity.
First there was Jesus .... one member^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
Then Jesus gather around him a dozen Apostles and a few dozen Disciples
.... lets say about a Hundred Christians.
Then WHO, Binky?? More Jews?? Sure, then who??
Pagans/Romans/Greeks/Arabs?? Who??^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted >to the best of my knowledge) come into existance?? Where THEY all good
And IF, in those early days, pagans did become Christians .... so what??
How did YOUR Church (YOU know, the one who YOU, Binky, have NEVER named,
boni fide Christians from way back when??
--
Daniel70
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>, Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>, Hornplayer9599
<Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of
the Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why
can't ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly
worship the same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the
Church up? Deflecting again, I see.
Falsehood! Never said that Horny!
Here is the proof!
In article <vq1l13$pm9v$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/03/2025 11:41 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted ^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <vq0ieq$geml$1@dont-email.me>,Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity", Binky??
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10, >>>> or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get >>>> more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic >>>>> rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian >>>>> Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity. >>>>
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
Too old pagans infiltrated Christianity impurifying Christianity.
^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
First there was Jesus .... one member
Then Jesus gather around him a dozen Apostles and a few dozen Disciples
.... lets say about a Hundred Christians.
Then WHO, Binky?? More Jews?? Sure, then who??
Pagans/Romans/Greeks/Arabs?? Who??^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
And IF, in those early days, pagans did become Christians .... so what??
How did YOUR Church (YOU know, the one who YOU, Binky, have NEVER named,
to the best of my knowledge) come into existance?? Where THEY all good
boni fide Christians from way back when??
In article <xn0p2tipw6out68006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
Here is the Bible on that:
.These articles interlink but as you seen The Modern
Roman Catholic Church is The Church of Thyatira of Revelation.
)
On 3/2/2025 06:04, Daniel70 wrote:
On 2/03/2025 2:53 am, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Of course, most sensible people think that they're all "Bogus" but I
won't de-rail this happy religious thread with common sense and
logic... a lot of people who believe in that alien from outer space
No! No, Blueshirt, we are not discussing The Klingons, The Ferengi nor
The Vulcans!!
- that supposedly created this world
No, they all want to blow Earth up!!
Actually the Ferengi would probably want to buy it.
- seem to have trouble with that sort of thing.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <xn0p2tni56vcmz0003@post.eweka.nl>,--
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:WHAT?? Nothing to say, Binky??
On 2/03/2025 2:53 am, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Of course, most sensible people think that they're all
"Bogus" but I won't de-rail this happy religious thread with
common sense and logic... a lot of people who believe in
that alien from outer space
No! No, Blueshirt, we are not discussing The Klingons, The
Ferengi nor The Vulcans!!
C'mon, you could have done better than that! This isn't a Star
Trek newsgroup.
Daleks, Cybermen and Sontarans would have been more apt.
- that supposedly created this world
No, they all want to blow Earth up!!
It's all fiction whatever way you want to look at it.
On 2/03/2025 11:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>, Hornplayer9599
<Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>, Hornplayer9599
<Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the Holy
Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of
the Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why
can't ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly
worship the same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the
Church up? Deflecting again, I see.
Falsehood! Never said that Horny!
Here is the proof!
Four times YOU gave Quotes ..... none of which dealt with Christ telling Peter the Peter is THE ROCK on which the Church would be built!!
Well done, Binky!!
On 2/03/2025 11:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>, Hornplayer9599
<Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>, Hornplayer9599
<Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of
the Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why
can't ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly
worship the same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the
Church up? Deflecting again, I see.
Falsehood! Never said that Horny!
Here is the proof!
Four times YOU gave Quotes ..... none of which dealt with Christ telling >Peter the Peter is THE ROCK on which the Church would be built!!
Well done, Binky!!
--
Daniel70
On 3/03/2025 12:25 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <vq1l13$pm9v$1@dont-email.me>,^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/03/2025 11:41 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <vq0ieq$geml$1@dont-email.me>,Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity", Binky??
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, 10, >>>>> or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you get >>>>> more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic >>>>>> rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian >>>>>> Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity. >>>>>
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
Too old pagans infiltrated Christianity impurifying Christianity.
talker noted^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
First there was Jesus .... one member
Then Jesus gather around him a dozen Apostles and a few dozen Disciples
.... lets say about a Hundred Christians.
Then WHO, Binky?? More Jews?? Sure, then who??
Pagans/Romans/Greeks/Arabs?? Who??^^^^^<-Peadophile
And IF, in those early days, pagans did become Christians .... so what?? >>>
How did YOUR Church (YOU know, the one who YOU, Binky, have NEVER named,
to the best of my knowledge) come into existance?? Where THEY all good
boni fide Christians from way back when??
Stupid!! Stupid!! Stupid!! I must remember to not ask Binky questions
which are too difficult for Binky to answer!!^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
On 3/03/2025 12:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq1l5n$pm9v$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/03/2025 8:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:.... and MY Footy team is way better than yours!! ;-P
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
Can they beat ARsenal FC, the Best UEFA Team.
Who the F*K is UEFA and what position does he play??
--
Daniel70
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic
rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian >>>> Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity. >>>>
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the Church
up? Deflecting again, I see.
Falsehood!
Never said that Horny!
Here is the proof!
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mt 16:13-20; Lk 9:18-21
27 (Lk 9:18-20) Jesus and His disciples went out into the towns
of Caesarea Philippi. On the way He asked His disciples,
"Who do men say that I am?"
28 (Mal 4:5; Mt 14:2) They answered, "John the Baptist, but some say,
Elijah; and others, one of the prophets."
29 (Jn 6:69; 11:27) He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
Peter answered Him, "You are the Christ."
30 (Mt 16:20; Lk 9:21) He warned them that they should tell no one about Him.
[27] And Jesus went out, and his disciples, into the towns of Caesarea Philippi: and by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do men say that I am?
[28] And they answered, John the Baptist: but some say, Elias; and others, One of the prophets.
[29] And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Peter answereth and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ.
[30] And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.
Matthew 16:13-20
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mk 8:27-30; Lk 9:18-21
13 (Lk 9:18-20; Mt 8:20) When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea Philippi, He asked His disciples, "Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?"
14 (Mt 14:2; Mk 6:15) They said, "Some say that You are John the Baptist, others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets."
15 He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
16 (Ps 42:2; Jn 11:27) Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ,
the Son of the living God."
17 (Gal 1:16; Jn 1:42; 21:15-17) Jesus answered him,
"Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for flesh and blood
has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.
18 (Jn 1:42; Job 38:17) And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock
I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. 19 (Mt 18:18; Isa 22:22; Jn 20:23) I will give you the keys of the kingdom
of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven,
and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
20 (Mk 8:30; Lk 9:21) Then He commanded His disciples to tell no one
that He was Jesus the Christ.
[13] When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
[14] And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias;
and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
[15] He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
[16] And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.
[17] And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is
in heaven.
[18] And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I
will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. [19] And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
[20] Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was Jesus the Christ.
Luke 9:18-20
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mt 16:13-19; Mk 8:27-29
18 (Mt 16:13-16; Lk 11:1) As He was alone praying, His disciples were
with Him. And He asked them, "Who do the people say that I am?"
19 (Lk 9:7-8; Mt 14:2) They answered, "John the Baptist.
But some say Elijah. And others say that one of the old prophets has risen." 20 (Jn 1:49; 11:27) He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
Peter answered, "The Christ of God."
[18] And it came to pass, as he was alone praying, his disciples were with him: and he asked them, saying, Whom say the people that I am?
[19] They answering said, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others say, that one of the old prophets is risen again.
[20] He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, The Christ of God.
So Horny, any rebuttal?
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 3/03/2025 12:22 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p2tni56vcmz0003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:WHAT?? Nothing to say, Binky??
On 2/03/2025 2:53 am, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Of course, most sensible people think that they're all
"Bogus" but I won't de-rail this happy religious thread with
common sense and logic... a lot of people who believe in
that alien from outer space
No! No, Blueshirt, we are not discussing The Klingons, The
Ferengi nor The Vulcans!!
C'mon, you could have done better than that! This isn't a Star
Trek newsgroup.
Daleks, Cybermen and Sontarans would have been more apt.
- that supposedly created this world
No, they all want to blow Earth up!!
It's all fiction whatever way you want to look at it.
--
Daniel70
On 3/03/2025 12:10 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p2tipw6out68006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
Here is the Bible on that:
No, Binky, not even close!!
.These articles interlink but as you seen The Modern
Roman Catholic Church is The Church of Thyatira of Revelation.
)
--
Daniel70
On 3/2/2025 06:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic >>>>> rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian >>>>> Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity. >>>>>
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the Church >>> up? Deflecting again, I see.
Falsehood!
Never said that Horny!
Here is the proof!
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mt 16:13-20; Lk 9:18-21
27 (Lk 9:18-20) Jesus and His disciples went out into the towns
of Caesarea Philippi. On the way He asked His disciples,
"Who do men say that I am?"
28 (Mal 4:5; Mt 14:2) They answered, "John the Baptist, but some say,
Elijah; and others, one of the prophets."
29 (Jn 6:69; 11:27) He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
Peter answered Him, "You are the Christ."
30 (Mt 16:20; Lk 9:21) He warned them that they should tell no one about Him.
[27] And Jesus went out, and his disciples, into the towns of Caesarea
Philippi: and by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do >> men say that I am?
[28] And they answered, John the Baptist: but some say, Elias; and others, >> One of the prophets.
[29] And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Peter answereth >> and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ.
[30] And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.
Matthew 16:13-20
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mk 8:27-30; Lk 9:18-21
13 (Lk 9:18-20; Mt 8:20) When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea
Philippi, He asked His disciples, "Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?"
14 (Mt 14:2; Mk 6:15) They said, "Some say that You are John the Baptist,
others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets."
15 He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
16 (Ps 42:2; Jn 11:27) Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ,
the Son of the living God."
17 (Gal 1:16; Jn 1:42; 21:15-17) Jesus answered him,
"Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for flesh and blood
has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.
18 (Jn 1:42; Job 38:17) And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock >> I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it. >> 19 (Mt 18:18; Isa 22:22; Jn 20:23) I will give you the keys of the kingdom >> of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven,
and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
20 (Mk 8:30; Lk 9:21) Then He commanded His disciples to tell no one
that He was Jesus the Christ.
[13] When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his
disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
[14] And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias;
and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
[15] He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
[16] And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the >> living God.
[17] And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: >> for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is >> in heaven.
[18] And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I
will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it.
[19] And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and
whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever >> thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
[20] Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was >> Jesus the Christ.
Luke 9:18-20
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mt 16:13-19; Mk 8:27-29
18 (Mt 16:13-16; Lk 11:1) As He was alone praying, His disciples were
with Him. And He asked them, "Who do the people say that I am?"
19 (Lk 9:7-8; Mt 14:2) They answered, "John the Baptist.
But some say Elijah. And others say that one of the old prophets has risen." >> 20 (Jn 1:49; 11:27) He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
Peter answered, "The Christ of God."
[18] And it came to pass, as he was alone praying, his disciples were with >> him: and he asked them, saying, Whom say the people that I am?
[19] They answering said, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others >> say, that one of the old prophets is risen again.
[20] He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, The >> Christ of God.
So Horny, any rebuttal?
This is like shooting fish in a barrel....
In your feeble attempt to discredit me, you provided the EXACT verse
where Jesus charges Peter to build and start up the Church.
Dave, at this point you should just take the "L" and go take a walk
outside. Or perhaps you would like to discuss a more relevant
verse...Exodus 20:16? You seem to break that one quite a bit.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 3/2/2025 08:02, Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
On 2/03/2025 11:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>, Hornplayer9599
<Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>, Hornplayer9599
<Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the Holy >>>>>>>> Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of
the Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why
can't ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly
worship the same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the
Church up? Deflecting again, I see.
Falsehood! Never said that Horny!
Here is the proof!
Four times YOU gave Quotes ..... none of which dealt with Christ telling
Peter the Peter is THE ROCK on which the Church would be built!!
Well done, Binky!!
I think (dangerous, I know) he's referring to my statement regarding his >comments about any Bible that isn't KJV, in particular the NIV. Funny
that, as his very words are located in this very quote of the thread.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity",
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedBinky??
First there was Jesus ....
You do know that Jesus wasn't actually a Christian, let alone
the first Christian, right?
If he existed... he was born, lived and died a Jew. His
followers were the Christians as they followed his teachings.
In article <SIZwP.68487$Kb9a.54767@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/2/2025 06:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
So Horny, any rebuttal?
This is like shooting fish in a barrel....
In your feeble attempt to discredit me, you provided the EXACT verse
where Jesus charges Peter to build and start up the Church.
Dave, at this point you should just take the "L" and go take a walk
outside. Or perhaps you would like to discuss a more relevant
verse...Exodus 20:16? You seem to break that one quite a bit.
Therefore the whole context is complex for you Horny!
In article <vq1okp$q8i2$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 3/03/2025 12:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq1l5n$pm9v$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/03/2025 8:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:.... and MY Footy team is way better than yours!! ;-P
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
Can they beat ARsenal FC, the Best UEFA Team.
Who the F*K is UEFA and what position does he play??
iYou said Footy!
On 3/03/2025 1:48 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity",
Binky??
First there was Jesus ....
You do know that Jesus wasn't actually a Christian, let alone
the first Christian, right?
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
If he existed... he was born, lived and died a Jew. His--
followers were the Christians as they followed his teachings.
Daniel70
On 3/03/2025 1:16 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted!
In article <SIZwP.68487$Kb9a.54767@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/2/2025 06:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
<Snip>
So Horny, any rebuttal?
This is like shooting fish in a barrel....
In your feeble attempt to discredit me, you provided the EXACT verse
where Jesus charges Peter to build and start up the Church.
Dave, at this point you should just take the "L" and go take a walk
outside. Or perhaps you would like to discuss a more relevant
verse...Exodus 20:16? You seem to break that one quite a bit.
Therefore the whole context is complex for you Horny!
.... and, of course, after making an accusation, binky FAILS to provide
and evidence or references for the Evidence!!
--
Daniel70
On 3/03/2025 1:14 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted!
In article <vq1okp$q8i2$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 3/03/2025 12:26 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq1l5n$pm9v$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/03/2025 8:16 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:.... and MY Footy team is way better than yours!! ;-P
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't
ye all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the
same god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's
anti-Catholic rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic
Church, the Christian Church started by St. Peter himself,
somehow isn't "true" Christianity.
It's not just him, on this island we have people very similar up
north... there is a right Bible (Usually the KJV) and a wrong
bible (Anything Catholics use). That's why I laugh at that sort
of thing. Some people are such pure Christians they deem other
Christians to be less pure... and those are the ones that
typically do and say the most un-Christian things. Which only
proves that they didn't even understand 'their' bible... a bible
that's supposedly better than all the rest! <shrugs>
Can they beat ARsenal FC, the Best UEFA Team.
Who the F*K is UEFA and what position does he play??
iYou said Footy!
No, Binky, I didn't say Footy, I typed it!! I don't need to say the
words as I type them, Binky!!^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted!
--
Daniel70
On 3/03/2025 12:25 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq1l13$pm9v$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/03/2025 11:41 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <vq0ieq$geml$1@dont-email.me>,Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity", Binky??
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic >>>>>> rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the
Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true"
Christianity.
Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six,
10,
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you
get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around
45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
Too old pagans infiltrated Christianity impurifying Christianity.
^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
First there was Jesus .... one member
Then Jesus gather around him a dozen Apostles and a few dozen Disciples
.... lets say about a Hundred Christians.
Then WHO, Binky?? More Jews?? Sure, then who??
Pagans/Romans/Greeks/Arabs?? Who??^^^^^<-Peadophile
And IF, in those early days, pagans did become Christians .... so what?? >>>
How did YOUR Church (YOU know, the one who YOU, Binky, have NEVER named,
talker noted
to the best of my knowledge) come into existance?? Where THEY all good
boni fide Christians from way back when??
Stupid!! Stupid!! Stupid!! I must remember to not ask Binky questions
which are too difficult for Binky to answer!!
In article <SIZwP.68487$Kb9a.54767@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/2/2025 06:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye
all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same
god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic >>>>>> rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian >>>>>> Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity. >>>>>>
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the Church >>>> up? Deflecting again, I see.
Falsehood!
Never said that Horny!
Here is the proof!
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mt 16:13-20; Lk 9:18-21
27 (Lk 9:18-20) Jesus and His disciples went out into the towns
of Caesarea Philippi. On the way He asked His disciples,
"Who do men say that I am?"
28 (Mal 4:5; Mt 14:2) They answered, "John the Baptist, but some say,
Elijah; and others, one of the prophets."
29 (Jn 6:69; 11:27) He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
Peter answered Him, "You are the Christ."
30 (Mt 16:20; Lk 9:21) He warned them that they should tell no one about Him.
[27] And Jesus went out, and his disciples, into the towns of Caesarea
Philippi: and by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do >>> men say that I am?
[28] And they answered, John the Baptist: but some say, Elias; and others, >>> One of the prophets.
[29] And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Peter answereth >>> and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ.
[30] And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.
Matthew 16:13-20
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mk 8:27-30; Lk 9:18-21
13 (Lk 9:18-20; Mt 8:20) When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea
Philippi, He asked His disciples, "Who do men say that I, the Son of Man, am?"
14 (Mt 14:2; Mk 6:15) They said, "Some say that You are John the Baptist, >>> others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets."
15 He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
16 (Ps 42:2; Jn 11:27) Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ,
the Son of the living God."
17 (Gal 1:16; Jn 1:42; 21:15-17) Jesus answered him,
"Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for flesh and blood
has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.
18 (Jn 1:42; Job 38:17) And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock >>> I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.
19 (Mt 18:18; Isa 22:22; Jn 20:23) I will give you the keys of the kingdom >>> of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven,
and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
20 (Mk 8:30; Lk 9:21) Then He commanded His disciples to tell no one
that He was Jesus the Christ.
[13] When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his
disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
[14] And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; >>> and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
[15] He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
[16] And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the >>> living God.
[17] And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona: >>> for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is >>> in heaven.
[18] And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I >>> will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. >>> [19] And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and
whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever
thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
[20] Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was >>> Jesus the Christ.
Luke 9:18-20
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mt 16:13-19; Mk 8:27-29
18 (Mt 16:13-16; Lk 11:1) As He was alone praying, His disciples were
with Him. And He asked them, "Who do the people say that I am?"
19 (Lk 9:7-8; Mt 14:2) They answered, "John the Baptist.
But some say Elijah. And others say that one of the old prophets has risen."
20 (Jn 1:49; 11:27) He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
Peter answered, "The Christ of God."
[18] And it came to pass, as he was alone praying, his disciples were with >>> him: and he asked them, saying, Whom say the people that I am?
[19] They answering said, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others >>> say, that one of the old prophets is risen again.
[20] He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, The
Christ of God.
So Horny, any rebuttal?
This is like shooting fish in a barrel....
In your feeble attempt to discredit me, you provided the EXACT verse
where Jesus charges Peter to build and start up the Church.
Dave, at this point you should just take the "L" and go take a walk
outside. Or perhaps you would like to discuss a more relevant
verse...Exodus 20:16? You seem to break that one quite a bit.
Therefore the whole context is complex for you Horny!
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 3/2/2025 08:04, Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 3/03/2025 12:25 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq1l13$pm9v$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/03/2025 11:41 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <vq0ieq$geml$1@dont-email.me>,Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity", Binky??
Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
On 2025-03-02 00:41:47 +0000, Hornplayer9599 said:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye >>>>>>>> all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same >>>>>>>> god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic >>>>>>> rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the
Christian
Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true"
Christianity.
Depending on how you structure them, there are at least three, six, >>>>>> 10,
or 12 main types of "Christianity". Sub-divide them further and you >>>>>> get
more than 200 Christian denominations in the USA alone, and around >>>>>> 45,000 around the world - all with their own slightly different
beliefs, and interpretations and versions of the Bible.
And that's without including Judaism, which is based on the same
supposed origins and has similar semi-separate divisions.
Too old pagans infiltrated Christianity impurifying Christianity.
^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
First there was Jesus .... one member
Then Jesus gather around him a dozen Apostles and a few dozen Disciples >>>> .... lets say about a Hundred Christians.
Then WHO, Binky?? More Jews?? Sure, then who??
Pagans/Romans/Greeks/Arabs?? Who??talker noted
And IF, in those early days, pagans did become Christians .... so what?? >>>>
How did YOUR Church (YOU know, the one who YOU, Binky, have NEVER named, >>> > ^^^^^<-Peadophile
to the best of my knowledge) come into existance?? Where THEY all good >>>> boni fide Christians from way back when??
Stupid!! Stupid!! Stupid!! I must remember to not ask Binky questions
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!which are too difficult for Binky to answer!!
That would be EVERY question possible.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 3/2/2025 08:16, The Doctor wrote:
In article <SIZwP.68487$Kb9a.54767@fx16.ams4>,about Him.
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/2/2025 06:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <GMQwP.7637$Kb9a.2397@fx16.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 21:05, The Doctor wrote:
In article <fPNwP.844$mM35.47@fx01.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/1/2025 09:53, Blueshirt wrote:
The NIV is a Satanic Anti-Christian humanist verion of the
Holy Word, i.e.e The NIV is an imposter.
Egads! A Christian who is prejudiced against a version of the
Holy Bible because it's different to his own one! Why can't ye >>>>>>>> all just get along? After all, you supposedly worship the same >>>>>>>> god.
Well, don't forget that this falls in line with Dave's anti-Catholic >>>>>>> rhetoric. Funny how he thinks that the Catholic Church, the Christian >>>>>>> Church started by St. Peter himself, somehow isn't "true" Christianity. >>>>>>>
What abot Jesus Christ who is the corenerstone of the Church?
You mean the Jesus Christ who told St. Peter to set and start the Church >>>>> up? Deflecting again, I see.
Falsehood!
Never said that Horny!
Here is the proof!
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mt 16:13-20; Lk 9:18-21
27 (Lk 9:18-20) Jesus and His disciples went out into the towns
of Caesarea Philippi. On the way He asked His disciples,
"Who do men say that I am?"
28 (Mal 4:5; Mt 14:2) They answered, "John the Baptist, but some say,
Elijah; and others, one of the prophets."
29 (Jn 6:69; 11:27) He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
Peter answered Him, "You are the Christ."
30 (Mt 16:20; Lk 9:21) He warned them that they should tell no one
Man, am?"
[27] And Jesus went out, and his disciples, into the towns of Caesarea >>>> Philippi: and by the way he asked his disciples, saying unto them, Whom do >>>> men say that I am?
[28] And they answered, John the Baptist: but some say, Elias; and others, >>>> One of the prophets.
[29] And he saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am? And Peter answereth
and saith unto him, Thou art the Christ.
[30] And he charged them that they should tell no man of him.
Matthew 16:13-20
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mk 8:27-30; Lk 9:18-21
13 (Lk 9:18-20; Mt 8:20) When Jesus came into the region of Caesarea
Philippi, He asked His disciples, "Who do men say that I, the Son of
14 (Mt 14:2; Mk 6:15) They said, "Some say that You are John the Baptist, >>>> others say Elijah, and others Jeremiah or one of the prophets."
15 He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
16 (Ps 42:2; Jn 11:27) Simon Peter replied, "You are the Christ,
the Son of the living God."
17 (Gal 1:16; Jn 1:42; 21:15-17) Jesus answered him,
"Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah, for flesh and blood
has not revealed this to you, but My Father who is in heaven.
18 (Jn 1:42; Job 38:17) And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock
I will build My church, and the gates of Hades shall not prevail against it.
19 (Mt 18:18; Isa 22:22; Jn 20:23) I will give you the keys of the kingdom >>>> of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven,
and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."
20 (Mk 8:30; Lk 9:21) Then He commanded His disciples to tell no one
that He was Jesus the Christ.
[13] When Jesus came into the coasts of Caesarea Philippi, he asked his >>>> disciples, saying, Whom do men say that I the Son of man am?
[14] And they said, Some say that thou art John the Baptist: some, Elias; >>>> and others, Jeremias, or one of the prophets.
[15] He saith unto them, But whom say ye that I am?
[16] And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the
living God.
[17] And Jesus answered and said unto him, Blessed art thou, Simon Barjona:
for flesh and blood hath not revealed it unto thee, but my Father which is >>>> in heaven.
[18] And I say also unto thee, That thou art Peter, and upon this rock I >>>> will build my church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. >>>> [19] And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and
whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever
thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.
[20] Then charged he his disciples that they should tell no man that he was
Jesus the Christ.
Luke 9:18-20
Peter's Declaration About Jesus
Mt 16:13-19; Mk 8:27-29
18 (Mt 16:13-16; Lk 11:1) As He was alone praying, His disciples were
with Him. And He asked them, "Who do the people say that I am?"
19 (Lk 9:7-8; Mt 14:2) They answered, "John the Baptist.
But some say Elijah. And others say that one of the old prophets has risen."
20 (Jn 1:49; 11:27) He said to them, "But who do you say that I am?"
Peter answered, "The Christ of God."
[18] And it came to pass, as he was alone praying, his disciples were with >>>> him: and he asked them, saying, Whom say the people that I am?
[19] They answering said, John the Baptist; but some say, Elias; and others
say, that one of the old prophets is risen again.
[20] He said unto them, But whom say ye that I am? Peter answering said, The
Christ of God.
So Horny, any rebuttal?
This is like shooting fish in a barrel....
In your feeble attempt to discredit me, you provided the EXACT verse
where Jesus charges Peter to build and start up the Church.
Dave, at this point you should just take the "L" and go take a walk
outside. Or perhaps you would like to discuss a more relevant
verse...Exodus 20:16? You seem to break that one quite a bit.
Therefore the whole context is complex for you Horny!
You wouldn't know context if it walked up to you and handed you a
freshly minted Loonie.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 3/03/2025 1:48 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity",
Binky??
First there was Jesus ....
You do know that Jesus wasn't actually a Christian, let alone
the first Christian, right?
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
Do you recall the lineage?--
If he existed... he was born, lived and died a Jew. His
followers were the Christians as they followed his teachings.
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 3/03/2025 1:48 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Who do YOU, Binky, think SHOULD be members of "Christianity",
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedBinky??
First there was Jesus ....
You do know that Jesus wasn't actually a Christian, let alone
the first Christian, right?
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Do you recall the lineage?--
If he existed... he was born, lived and died a Jew. His
followers were the Christians as they followed his teachings.
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
On 4/03/2025 10:52 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:.... but .... but ..... but my Bible lists the lineage!! ;-P
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 10:52 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:.... but .... but ..... but my Bible lists the lineage!! ;-P
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's
only hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of
course.
My bible doesn't... so YOUR bible is fake and Satanist!
Until I see it written in MY accepted version of the bible - The
Blueshirt Revised Version (BRV) - then it's not true.
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent in the
Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary through
divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to Mary (NOT
Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special about
being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand years earlier.
(There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims that it's
almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or Irish grandparents to
NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...)
--
There’s no point in being grown up if you can’t act a little childish
sometimes.
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so
it's only hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise
of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant
of King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>,
The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so
it's only hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise
of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant
of King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
I don't know if Mike is saying that, but I'll happy butt in and
say yes, I think the bible is full of lies.
And you can quote me on that!!!
The Last Doctor wrote:
There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims
that it's almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or
Irish grandparents to NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...
I'm related to royalty? Wow! Now I know what it means to be the
crowned one!
I loved my great (x375) Grandad Teddy, he was a great King. Much
better than that big-eared Charlie fella.
It's okay though folks, I won't let it go to my head... you can
still call me Blueshirt. There's no need to bother with the
Prince bit...
On 3/4/2025 09:19, The Last Doctor wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
And a descendant of King David.Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of King David. >> Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent in the >> Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary through
divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to Mary
(NOT
Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is no evidence that >> Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special about
being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand years earlier.
(There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims that it's
almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or Irish grandparents to
NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...)
Interesting that you mentioned that...I think I read somewhere where it
was claimed that you could trace all the European Royal lines back to >Charlemagne.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of
King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent
in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary
through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to
Mary (NOT Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is
no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special
about being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand
years earlier.
So you are saying the Gospels of Matthew and Luke lie.
--(There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims that
it's almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or Irish
grandparents to NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...)
In article <xn0p2wfwg9paxw4008@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
I doubt it is heresay
On 5/03/2025 2:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of
King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent
in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary
through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to
Mary (NOT Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is
no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special
about being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand
years earlier.
So you are saying the Gospels of Matthew and Luke lie.
Lies?? Maybe not .... but they ARE just stories, handed down from one generation to another!!
Binky, have YOU ever played a game where the first person whispers
something to the second person who then whispers it to the third
person ..... etc., ..... etc., until it gets to the last person who says
what they were told out loud so comparisons can be made.
I think the game is called "Chinese Whispers"
That, more or less, is what The Bible is about !!
(There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims that
it's almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or Irish
grandparents to NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...)
On 5/03/2025 1:13 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Oh!! Well, if you want a REAL refence, Blueshirt, ......!
On 4/03/2025 10:52 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:.... but .... but ..... but my Bible lists the lineage!! ;-P
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's
only hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of
course.
My bible doesn't... so YOUR bible is fake and Satanist!
Until I see it written in MY accepted version of the bible - The
Blueshirt Revised Version (BRV) - then it's not true.
--
Daniel70
On 5/03/2025 8:00 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:Blueshirt ..... or BlueROBE!!
There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims
that it's almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or
Irish grandparents to NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...
I'm related to royalty? Wow! Now I know what it means to be the
crowned one!
I loved my great (x375) Grandad Teddy, he was a great King. Much
better than that big-eared Charlie fella.
It's okay though folks, I won't let it go to my head... you can
still call me Blueshirt. There's no need to bother with the
Prince bit...
--
Daniel70
On 5/03/2025 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p2wfwg9paxw4008@post.eweka.nl>,It MUST be Hearsay, Binky, cause, when Adam and Eve were kicked out of
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
I doubt it is heresay
The Garden of Eden, they found a whole heap of other 'peoples' just
around the 'metaphorical' corner .... so plenty of possibilities of not
being descended fro Adam or Eve!!
--
Daniel70
On 5/03/2025 2:58 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of
King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent
in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary
through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to
Mary (NOT Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is
no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special
about being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand
years earlier.
So you are saying the Gospels of Matthew and Luke lie.
Lies?? Maybe not .... but they ARE just stories, handed down from one >generation to another!!
Binky, have YOU ever played a game where the first person whispers
something to the second person who then whispers it to the third person
..... etc., ..... etc., until it gets to the last person who says what
they were told out loud so comparisons can be made.
I think the game is called "Chinese Whispers"
That, more or less, is what The Bible is about !!
--(There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims that
it's almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or Irish
grandparents to NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...)
Daniel70
On 3/5/2025 05:08, Daniel70 wrote:
On 5/03/2025 2:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of
King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent
in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary
through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to
Mary (NOT Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is
no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special
about being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand
years earlier.
So you are saying the Gospels of Matthew and Luke lie.
Lies?? Maybe not .... but they ARE just stories, handed down from one
generation to another!!
Binky, have YOU ever played a game where the first person whispers
something to the second person who then whispers it to the third
person ..... etc., ..... etc., until it gets to the last person who says
what they were told out loud so comparisons can be made.
I think the game is called "Chinese Whispers"
We called it "Chinese Telephone" growing up...but "Whispers" works as
just as well.
That, more or less, is what The Bible is about !!
(There's a famous piece of genealogical research that claims that
it's almost impossible for any Briton with 4 British or Irish
grandparents to NOT be a descendant of Edward III ...)
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
Use the KJV.
The Doctor wrote:
Use the KJV.
Dave, I am not a religious person (Breaking news!) but even I
know that the KJV has been discredited by some religious
scholars as an unreliable translation and in some churches the
KJV has been replaced by newer versions and revised editions.
(NKJV, NIV etc.)
These highly educated people are unlikely to all be wrong and
you, a guy that runs an ISP in Canada, right.
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can stick
your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2wu0fa8fl9p000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
I don't know if Mike is saying that but I'll happy butt in
and say, yes I think the bible is full of lies.
And you can quote me on that!!!
No wonder you are not mentally functional BS!
Wow! A proper sentence that I could understand with two long-ish
words spelled correctly...
Keep it up Dave. There's hope for you yet.
The Doctor wrote:
Use the KJV.
Dave, I am not a religious person (Breaking news!) but even I
know that the KJV has been discredited by some religious
scholars as an unreliable translation and in some churches the
KJV has been replaced by newer versions and revised editions.
(NKJV, NIV etc.)
These highly educated people are unlikely to all be wrong and
you, a guy that runs an ISP in Canada, right.
Either educate yourself of S*U about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can stick
your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
On 2025-03-05 2:14 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Use the KJV.
Dave, I am not a religious person (Breaking news!) but even I
know that the KJV has been discredited by some religious
scholars as an unreliable translation and in some churches the
KJV has been replaced by newer versions and revised editions.
(NKJV, NIV etc.)
These highly educated people are unlikely to all be wrong and
you, a guy that runs an ISP in Canada, right.
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can stick
your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
If you want binky to really squirm, mention that historians believe that
King James was gay.
____________________________
AI Overview
Learn more
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/
King_James_I_of_England_and_VI_of_Scotland_by_John_De_Critz_the_Elder.jpg/170px-King_James_I_of_England_and_VI_of_Scotland_by_John_De_Critz_the_Elder.jpg
King James VI and I (1566-1625) is widely considered to have been either
gay or bisexual. While there is no definitive proof, the evidence
suggests that he had close relationships with several male courtiers. Evidence for his sexuality
Relationships with male courtiers
James had close relationships with George Villiers, Robert Carr, and
Esmé Stuart.
Behavior
James' behavior towards his favorites was considered unusual and
suggestive even by the standards of his time.
Letters
James' letters to Carr and Buckingham reveal sexual frustration and
passion.
Context
It's important to consider that the terms "gay" or "bisexual" were not
in use in the 16th and 17th centuries. At the time, sexuality was not
used to construct identities as it is today.
Historians' views
Many historians now agree that substantial historical evidence suggests
that James was likely either gay or bisexual.
Mary & George: homosexual relationships in the time of King ...
Mar 7, 2024 — No one identified as a “homosexual” in King James's time (1566-1625). The word was only coined in the Victorian period ...
University of Portsmouth
Sexuality of James VI and I - Wikipedia
Summarising the views of more recent historians social historian Emma
Dabiri stated in 2017 that now few historians and biographer...
Wikipedia
13 LGBTQ royals you didn't learn about in history class - NBC News
Oct 18, 2021 — King James I of England (1566 - 1625) The son of Mary,
Queen of Scots, this British monarch, known as both King James ...
NBC News
Show all
Generative AI is experimental.
___________________________________________________
Binky loves AI so much this must be factual but it drives the homophobe
nuts.
The asswipe asked:
Even heard of corrupting language?
It’s something you do a lot.
In article <vq9brn$2d0un$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 5/03/2025 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p2wfwg9paxw4008@post.eweka.nl>,It MUST be Hearsay, Binky, cause, when Adam and Eve were kicked out of
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
I doubt it is heresay
The Garden of Eden, they found a whole heap of other 'peoples' just
around the 'metaphorical' corner .... so plenty of possibilities of not
being descended fro Adam or Eve!!
Doubtful Dannyboy.
In article <vq9baq$2ctvr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 5/03/2025 2:58 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of
King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent
in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary
through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to
Mary (NOT Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is
no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special
about being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand
years earlier.
So you are saying the Gospels of Matthew and Luke lie.
Lies?? Maybe not .... but they ARE just stories, handed down from one
generation to another!!
Binky, have YOU ever played a game where the first person whispers
something to the second person who then whispers it to the third person
..... etc., ..... etc., until it gets to the last person who says what
they were told out loud so comparisons can be made.
I think the game is called "Chinese Whispers"
That, more or less, is what The Bible is about !!
So is the follow a lie Dannyboy?
Matthew 1:1-17
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ
Lk 3:23-38
1 (Ge 22:18; Isa 11:1; Ro 1:3) The book of the genealogy
of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the son of Abraham:
2 (Ge 25:26; Ac 7:8) Abraham was the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers.
3 (Ge 46:12; 38:29-30) Judah was the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar, Perez the father of Hezron,
and Hezron the father of Ram.
4 Ram was the father of Amminadab,
Amminadab the father of Nahshon,
and Nahshon the father of Salmon.
5 (Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25) Salmon was the father of Boaz by Rahab,
Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth,
and Obed the father of Jesse.
6 (1Sa 16:1; 17:12) Jesse was the father of David the king.
David the king was the father of Solomon,
by her who had been the wife of Uriah.
7 Solomon was the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
and Abijah the father of Asa.
8 (1Ch 3:11) Asa was the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Joram,
and Joram the father of Uzziah.
9 Uzziah was the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah.
10 Hezekiah was the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amon,
and Amon the father of Josiah.
11 (Jer 27:20; Da 1:2) Josiah was the father of Jeconiah
and his brothers about the time they were exiled to Babylon.
12 (1Ch 3:17; Ezr 3:2) And after they were brought to Babylon,
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
and Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel.
13 Zerubbabel was the father of Abiud,
Abiud the father of Eliakim,
and Eliakim the father of Azor.
14 Azor was the father of Zadok,
Zadok the father of Akim,
and Akim the father of Eliud.
15 Eliud was the father of Eleazar,
Eleazar the father of Matthan,
and Matthan the father of Jacob.
16 (Mt 27:17; Lk 3:23) And Jacob was the father of Joseph,
the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations, from David until the exile to Babylon are fourteen generations,
and from the exile in Babylon to Christ are fourteen generations.
The asswipe asked:
Even heard of corrupting language?
It’s something you do a lot.
--
solar penguin
On 6/03/2025 11:20 am, Peadophile Idlehands wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 2025-03-05 2:14 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Use the KJV.
Dave, I am not a religious person (Breaking news!) but even I
know that the KJV has been discredited by some religious
scholars as an unreliable translation and in some churches the
KJV has been replaced by newer versions and revised editions.
(NKJV, NIV etc.)
These highly educated people are unlikely to all be wrong and
you, a guy that runs an ISP in Canada, right.
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can stick
your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
If you want binky to really squirm, mention that historians believe that
King James was gay.
____________________________
AI Overview
Learn more
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b0/
King_James_I_of_England_and_VI_of_Scotland_by_John_De_Critz_the_Elder.jpg/170px-King_James_I_of_England_and_VI_of_Scotland_by_John_De_Critz_the_Elder.jpg
King James VI and I (1566-1625) is widely considered to have been either
gay or bisexual. While there is no definitive proof, the evidence
suggests that he had close relationships with several male courtiers.
Evidence for his sexuality
Relationships with male courtiers
James had close relationships with George Villiers, Robert Carr, and
Esmé Stuart.
Behavior
James' behavior towards his favorites was considered unusual and
suggestive even by the standards of his time.
Letters
James' letters to Carr and Buckingham reveal sexual frustration and
passion.
Context
It's important to consider that the terms "gay" or "bisexual" were not
in use in the 16th and 17th centuries. At the time, sexuality was not
used to construct identities as it is today.
Historians' views
Many historians now agree that substantial historical evidence suggests
that James was likely either gay or bisexual.
Mary & George: homosexual relationships in the time of King ...
Mar 7, 2024 — No one identified as a “homosexual” in King James's time >> (1566-1625). The word was only coined in the Victorian period ...
University of Portsmouth
Sexuality of James VI and I - Wikipedia
Summarising the views of more recent historians social historian Emma
Dabiri stated in 2017 that now few historians and biographer...
Wikipedia
13 LGBTQ royals you didn't learn about in history class - NBC News
Oct 18, 2021 — King James I of England (1566 - 1625) The son of Mary,
Queen of Scots, this British monarch, known as both King James ...
NBC News
Show all
Generative AI is experimental.
___________________________________________________
Binky loves AI so much this must be factual but it drives the homophobe
^^^^<-Paedophile talker notednuts.Responding purely so that Binky will get to see what you have posted,
Idlehands .... cause WE all know Binky has you kill-filed so doesn't, >usually, supposedly 'see' your posts, Idlehands. ;-P
--
Daniel70
On 6/03/2025 7:15 pm, solar penguin wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
The asswipe asked:Come on, now, Solar Penguin, now YOU are corrupting the Language.
Even heard of corrupting language?
It’s something you do a lot.
We ALL know that Binky ALWAYS corrupts whatever language he claims to be
using!!
--
Daniel70
On 6/03/2025 1:53 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq9baq$2ctvr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 5/03/2025 2:58 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of
King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent
in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary
through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to
Mary (NOT Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is
no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special
about being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand
years earlier.
So you are saying the Gospels of Matthew and Luke lie.
Lies?? Maybe not .... but they ARE just stories, handed down from one
generation to another!!
Binky, have YOU ever played a game where the first person whispers
something to the second person who then whispers it to the third person
..... etc., ..... etc., until it gets to the last person who says what
they were told out loud so comparisons can be made.
I think the game is called "Chinese Whispers"
That, more or less, is what The Bible is about !!
So is the follow a lie Dannyboy?
Matthew 1:1-17
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ
Lk 3:23-38
1 (Ge 22:18; Isa 11:1; Ro 1:3) The book of the genealogy
of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the son of Abraham:
2 (Ge 25:26; Ac 7:8) Abraham was the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers.
3 (Ge 46:12; 38:29-30) Judah was the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar,
Perez the father of Hezron,
and Hezron the father of Ram.
4 Ram was the father of Amminadab,
Amminadab the father of Nahshon,
and Nahshon the father of Salmon.
5 (Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25) Salmon was the father of Boaz by Rahab,
Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth,
and Obed the father of Jesse.
6 (1Sa 16:1; 17:12) Jesse was the father of David the king.
David the king was the father of Solomon,
by her who had been the wife of Uriah.
7 Solomon was the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
and Abijah the father of Asa.
8 (1Ch 3:11) Asa was the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Joram,
and Joram the father of Uzziah.
9 Uzziah was the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah.
10 Hezekiah was the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amon,
and Amon the father of Josiah.
11 (Jer 27:20; Da 1:2) Josiah was the father of Jeconiah
and his brothers about the time they were exiled to Babylon.
12 (1Ch 3:17; Ezr 3:2) And after they were brought to Babylon,
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
and Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel.
13 Zerubbabel was the father of Abiud,
Abiud the father of Eliakim,
and Eliakim the father of Azor.
14 Azor was the father of Zadok,
Zadok the father of Akim,
and Akim the father of Eliud.
15 Eliud was the father of Eleazar,
Eleazar the father of Matthan,
and Matthan the father of Jacob.
16 (Mt 27:17; Lk 3:23) And Jacob was the father of Joseph,
the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations,
from David until the exile to Babylon are fourteen generations,
and from the exile in Babylon to Christ are fourteen generations.
Oh!! No!! Binky, which bit of The Bible do we believe??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ but, then, Verse 17 >states there were only 28 Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the statement of (14 + 14) 28 >Generations??
--
Daniel70
On 6/03/2025 1:55 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq9brn$2d0un$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 5/03/2025 2:32 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p2wfwg9paxw4008@post.eweka.nl>,It MUST be Hearsay, Binky, cause, when Adam and Eve were kicked out of
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only
hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
I doubt it is heresay
The Garden of Eden, they found a whole heap of other 'peoples' just
around the 'metaphorical' corner .... so plenty of possibilities of not
being descended fro Adam or Eve!!
Doubtful Dannyboy.
Oh!! Where's YOUR Biblical Reference, Binky??
--
Daniel70
The asswipe asked:
Even heard of corrupting language?
It’s something you do a lot.
On 3/6/2025 02:15, solar penguin wrote:
The asswipe asked:
Even heard of corrupting language?
It’s something you do a lot.
Wouldn't that require him to know how to use a language before he can
corrupt it?
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
In article <xn0p2y9c8botuxv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Use the KJV.
Dave, I am not a religious person (Breaking news!) but even I
know that the KJV has been discredited by some religious
scholars as an unreliable translation and in some churches
the KJV has been replaced by newer versions and revised
editions. (NKJV, NIV etc.)
These highly educated people are unlikely to all be wrong and
you, a guy that runs an ISP in Canada, right.
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can
stick your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
Even heard of corrupting language?
On 2025-03-05 2:14 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can
stick your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
If you want binky to really squirm, mention that historians
believe that King James was gay.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2y9c8botuxv004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Use the KJV.
Dave, I am not a religious person (Breaking news!) but even I
know that the KJV has been discredited by some religious
scholars as an unreliable translation and in some churches
the KJV has been replaced by newer versions and revised
editions. (NKJV, NIV etc.)
These highly educated people are unlikely to all be wrong and
you, a guy that runs an ISP in Canada, right.
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can
stick your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
Even heard of corrupting language?
Yes, and the KJV does plenty of that!
I mean, those ancient Israelite communities didn't talk like
that did they? So somebody corrupted their writings to come up
with the bible...
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live their
lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to tell them how
to do it.
Lying PAedophile Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-03-05 2:14 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can
stick your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
If you want binky to really squirm, mention that historians
believe that King James was gay.
Yeah, but if it doesn't actually say that in the KJV then Dave
wouldn't believe it...
OTOH, if it did say that in the KJV it would just be another one
of the bible passages that he - and his Pastor - would
selectively ignore...
The asswipe also asked:
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/6/2025 02:15, solar penguin wrote:
The asswipe asked:
Even heard of corrupting language?
It’s something you do a lot.
Wouldn't that require him to know how to use a language before
he can corrupt it?
Meaning?
Oh, the irony!
--
solar penguin
In article <xn0p2ze78cr30t9008@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Lying PAedophile Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-03-05 2:14 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can
stick your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
If you want binky to really squirm, mention that historians
believe that King James was gay.
Yeah, but if it doesn't actually say that in the KJV then Dave
wouldn't believe it...
OTOH, if it did say that in the KJV it would just be another one
of the bible passages that he - and his Pastor - would
selectively ignore...
Anything from Idlehands is unreliable.
In article <vqbugh$2uk8s$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 6/03/2025 1:53 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq9baq$2ctvr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 5/03/2025 2:58 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only >>>>>>> hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of
King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent >>>>>> in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary
through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to >>>>>> Mary (NOT Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is >>>>>> no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special
about being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand
years earlier.
So you are saying the Gospels of Matthew and Luke lie.
Lies?? Maybe not .... but they ARE just stories, handed down from one >>>> generation to another!!
Binky, have YOU ever played a game where the first person whispers
something to the second person who then whispers it to the third person >>>> ..... etc., ..... etc., until it gets to the last person who says what >>>> they were told out loud so comparisons can be made.
I think the game is called "Chinese Whispers"
That, more or less, is what The Bible is about !!
So is the follow a lie Dannyboy?
Matthew 1:1-17
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ
Lk 3:23-38
1 (Ge 22:18; Isa 11:1; Ro 1:3) The book of the genealogy
of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the son of Abraham:
2 (Ge 25:26; Ac 7:8) Abraham was the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers.
3 (Ge 46:12; 38:29-30) Judah was the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar, >>> Perez the father of Hezron,
and Hezron the father of Ram.
4 Ram was the father of Amminadab,
Amminadab the father of Nahshon,
and Nahshon the father of Salmon.
5 (Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25) Salmon was the father of Boaz by Rahab,
Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth,
and Obed the father of Jesse.
6 (1Sa 16:1; 17:12) Jesse was the father of David the king.
David the king was the father of Solomon,
by her who had been the wife of Uriah.
7 Solomon was the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
and Abijah the father of Asa.
8 (1Ch 3:11) Asa was the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Joram,
and Joram the father of Uzziah.
9 Uzziah was the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah.
10 Hezekiah was the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amon,
and Amon the father of Josiah.
11 (Jer 27:20; Da 1:2) Josiah was the father of Jeconiah
and his brothers about the time they were exiled to Babylon.
12 (1Ch 3:17; Ezr 3:2) And after they were brought to Babylon,
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
and Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel.
13 Zerubbabel was the father of Abiud,
Abiud the father of Eliakim,
and Eliakim the father of Azor.
14 Azor was the father of Zadok,
Zadok the father of Akim,
and Akim the father of Eliud.
15 Eliud was the father of Eleazar,
Eleazar the father of Matthan,
and Matthan the father of Jacob.
16 (Mt 27:17; Lk 3:23) And Jacob was the father of Joseph,
the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations, >>> from David until the exile to Babylon are fourteen generations,
and from the exile in Babylon to Christ are fourteen generations.
Oh!! No!! Binky, which bit of The Bible do we believe??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ but, then, Verse 17
states there were only 28 Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the statement of (14 + 14) 28
Generations??
Do reread again!
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Even heard of corrupting language?
Yes, and the KJV does plenty of that!
I mean, those ancient Israelite communities didn't talk like
that did they? So somebody corrupted their writings to come
up with the bible...
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
On 7/03/2025 11:51 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p2ze78cr30t9008@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Lying PAedophile Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-03-05 2:14 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
Either educate yourself of STFU about your fundamentalist
beliefs based on nothing more than hearsay... and you can
stick your KJV up your arse too whilst you are at it!
If you want binky to really squirm, mention that historians
^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted >--.... but STILL more reliable than anything YOU, Binky, post!!believe that King James was gay.
Yeah, but if it doesn't actually say that in the KJV then Dave
wouldn't believe it...
OTOH, if it did say that in the KJV it would just be another one
of the bible passages that he - and his Pastor - would
selectively ignore...
Anything from Idlehands is unreliable.
Daniel70
The asswipe asserted:
In article <vqcegm$31cf1$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
The asswipe also asked:
Watch what paedophile corrupts your mouth birdie.
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/6/2025 02:15, solar penguin wrote:
The asswipe asked:
Even heard of corrupting language?
It’s something you do a lot.
Wouldn't that require him to know how to use a language
before he can corrupt it?
Meaning?
Oh, the irony!
Birdie is too scared to answer.
* WHOOSH *
--
solar penguin
On 6/03/2025 11:23 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vqbugh$2uk8s$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 6/03/2025 1:53 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq9baq$2ctvr$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 5/03/2025 2:58 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vq75lf$1tv52$1@dont-email.me>, The Last Doctor
<mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
On 04/03/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 4/03/2025 1:09 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vq49dg$1ald5$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
Yes, of course .... he was a Jew!!
And a descendant of King David.
And a descendant of 'Adam', too!!
Allegedly.
I'm not sure genealogy science was around back then so it's only >>>>>>>> hearsay... unless somebody can PROVE otherwise of course. ;-)
There's no evidence in the Bible that Jesus was a descendant of
King David.
Exuse us , are you saying the Holy Bible is a liar?
Yes, there are two (conflicting and contradictory) lines of descent >>>>>>> in the Gospels from King David down to Joseph Carpenter.
But according to Christian doctrine, Jesus was conceived by Mary >>>>>>> through divine intervention. Joseph was not a blood relative.
Therefore, without a documented line of descent from King David to >>>>>>> Mary (NOT Joseph), no matter how apocryphal or inaccurate, there is >>>>>>> no evidence that Jesus was a descendant of King David.
That said, almost all Jews probably were. There's nothing special >>>>>>> about being descended from a ruler of the same people a thousand >>>>>>> years earlier.
So you are saying the Gospels of Matthew and Luke lie.
Lies?? Maybe not .... but they ARE just stories, handed down from one >>>>> generation to another!!
Binky, have YOU ever played a game where the first person whispers
something to the second person who then whispers it to the third person >>>>> ..... etc., ..... etc., until it gets to the last person who says what >>>>> they were told out loud so comparisons can be made.
I think the game is called "Chinese Whispers"
That, more or less, is what The Bible is about !!
So is the follow a lie Dannyboy?
Matthew 1:1-17
The Genealogy of Jesus Christ
Lk 3:23-38
1 (Ge 22:18; Isa 11:1; Ro 1:3) The book of the genealogy
of Jesus Christ, the Son of David, the son of Abraham:
2 (Ge 25:26; Ac 7:8) Abraham was the father of Isaac,
Isaac the father of Jacob,
and Jacob the father of Judah and his brothers.
3 (Ge 46:12; 38:29-30) Judah was the father of Perez and Zerah by Tamar, >>>> Perez the father of Hezron,
and Hezron the father of Ram.
4 Ram was the father of Amminadab,
Amminadab the father of Nahshon,
and Nahshon the father of Salmon.
5 (Heb 11:31; Jas 2:25) Salmon was the father of Boaz by Rahab,
Boaz the father of Obed by Ruth,
and Obed the father of Jesse.
6 (1Sa 16:1; 17:12) Jesse was the father of David the king.
David the king was the father of Solomon,
by her who had been the wife of Uriah.
7 Solomon was the father of Rehoboam,
Rehoboam the father of Abijah,
and Abijah the father of Asa.
8 (1Ch 3:11) Asa was the father of Jehoshaphat,
Jehoshaphat the father of Joram,
and Joram the father of Uzziah.
9 Uzziah was the father of Jotham,
Jotham the father of Ahaz,
and Ahaz the father of Hezekiah.
10 Hezekiah was the father of Manasseh,
Manasseh the father of Amon,
and Amon the father of Josiah.
11 (Jer 27:20; Da 1:2) Josiah was the father of Jeconiah
and his brothers about the time they were exiled to Babylon.
12 (1Ch 3:17; Ezr 3:2) And after they were brought to Babylon,
Jeconiah was the father of Shealtiel,
and Shealtiel the father of Zerubbabel.
13 Zerubbabel was the father of Abiud,
Abiud the father of Eliakim,
and Eliakim the father of Azor.
14 Azor was the father of Zadok,
Zadok the father of Akim,
and Akim the father of Eliud.
15 Eliud was the father of Eleazar,
Eleazar the father of Matthan,
and Matthan the father of Jacob.
16 (Mt 27:17; Lk 3:23) And Jacob was the father of Joseph,
the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ.
17 So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations, >>>> from David until the exile to Babylon are fourteen generations,
and from the exile in Babylon to Christ are fourteen generations.
Oh!! No!! Binky, which bit of The Bible do we believe??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ but, then, Verse 17
states there were only 28 Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the statement of (14 + 14) 28 >>> Generations??
Do reread again!
Do answer a Question for a change, Binky!!
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ but,
then, Verse 17 states there were only 28 Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the statement of
(14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
<face palm> Somebody clearly wasn't paying attention!
No wonder you can sit through an Agatha Christie play and not
know who did it at the end!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Even heard of corrupting language?
Yes, and the KJV does plenty of that!
I mean, those ancient Israelite communities didn't talk like
that did they? So somebody corrupted their writings to come
up with the bible...
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps you
happy...
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps
you happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps
you happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could
just be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know
it!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps
you happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could
just be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know
it!
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps
you happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could
just be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know
it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what we
think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run by
someone / something else ... which sounds like someone has been reading
too much Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Supposedly what we see as
'deja vu' is actually the simulation being re-run or rewound for some
reason. :-\
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps you
happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just
be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what
we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run
by someone / something else
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy.
Supposedly what we see as 'deja vu' is actually the simulation being--
re-run or rewound for some reason. :-\
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps
you happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could
just be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know
it!
Prove it.
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps you
happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just
be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what
we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run
by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the
Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book Six!!
Supposedly what we see as 'deja vu' is actually the simulation being--
re-run or rewound for some reason. :-\
Daniel70
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted! >--
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose
of any Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live
their lives a true and kind way shouldn't need a book to
tell them how to do it.
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps
you happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could
just be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know
it!
Prove it.
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ
but, then, Verse 17 states there were only 28
Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the
statement of (14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
<face palm> Somebody clearly wasn't paying attention!
No wonder you can sit through an Agatha Christie play and not
know who did it at the end!
Yes, the BRV...!!!
You could re-read this thread again, properly... or try and work
it out using your little grey cells.
[Clue] It's on topic for this thread and if you think about it
it's a lot easier to work out than who killed the people in "And
Then There Were None".
On 8/03/2025 9:22 pm, Blueshirt wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ
but, then, Verse 17 states there were only 28
Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the
statement of (14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
<face palm> Somebody clearly wasn't paying attention!
No wonder you can sit through an Agatha Christie play and not
know who did it at the end!
Yes, the BRV...!!!
You could re-read this thread again, properly... or try and work
it out using your little grey cells.
I tried back-reading about ten levels .... but got no reference to 'BRV'.
[Clue] It's on topic for this thread and if you think about itSo is 'BRV' a reference to 'Binky Regal Version'??
it's a lot easier to work out than who killed the people in "And
Then There Were None".
Or, maybe, 'Blueshirt Revised Version'??
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose of any >>>>>>> Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live their lives a >>>>>>> true and kind way shouldn't need a book to tell them how to do it. >>>>>>
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps you
happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just
be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what
we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run
by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the
Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book
Six!!
Supposedly what we see as 'deja vu' is actually the simulation being
re-run or rewound for some reason. :-\
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose of any >>>>>>>> Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live their lives a >>>>>>>> true and kind way shouldn't need a book to tell them how to do it. >>>>>>>
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps you
happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just
be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what
we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run
by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the
Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book
Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short story, "Young
Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got the entire "Galaxy..." collection in
one complied book, but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even
after living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I can't quickly
go take a look.
On 3/8/2025 04:22, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
I'm still not convinced that he's paying attention to his pastor/Bible
with any real accuracy. He almost reminds me of a band student I had
about 15 years ago. 12 years old, and was *convinced* that the sky was >purple! I am not making this up. Came to discover why: she believes >whatever information was told to her by the first person to tell her; if
you are the second person to tell her something, and it is not what the
first person told her...you are wrong. Someone was probably joking with
her when she was little, told her the sky was purple, and that was >that....even though just going outside (or hell...look out a window) and >taking a look up would prove otherwise.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 08/03/2025 16:36, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:There was a sort of sixth book, "The Salmon of Doubt", which is a posthumous
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p30rh6e4ssao003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p2zcv9cparea003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Just as you are made up BlueShirt.
It's made up Dave, to serve a purpose. But not the purpose of any >>>>>>>>> Lord. People who want to believe in a god and live their lives a >>>>>>>>> true and kind way shouldn't need a book to tell them how to do it. >>>>>>>>
What a comeback! That witty response has really hit home.
I don't really know what it means mind you, but if it keeps you
happy...
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just
be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what
we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run
by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the
Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book
Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short story, "Young >>Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got the entire "Galaxy..." collection in
one complied book, but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even
after living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I can't quickly
go take a look.
collection which is 50% non fiction articles, and a second half that
includes the unfinished draft of what was either going to be the third Dirk Gently novel or the sixth Hitchhikers book, depending on which way DNA was facing when he reworked it, and also the aforementioned "Young Zaphod" and another short story based on a sketch by DNA and Graham Chapman, "The
Private Life of Genghis Khan", included because it features the HH
character Wowbagger the Infinitely Prolonged.
In true HitchHiker Trilogy fashion, there is also a DNA estate-approved
actual 6th novel, "And Another Thing," by Irish author Eoin Colfer. It's
not bad, and it does its best to rescue the overall storyline from the
bleak outlook of "Mostly Harmless." And it's quite amusing. But it's not "Adams at his best" amusing.
--
There’s no point in being grown up if you can’t act a little childish
sometimes.
In article <xn0p31z0hfas1ca003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
What about all DW episides refering to the REformation?
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just
be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what
we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run
by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the
Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book
Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short story, "Young
Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got the entire "Galaxy..." collection in
one complied book, but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even
after living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I can't quickly
go take a look.
On 3/8/2025 04:22, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
I'm still not convinced that he's paying attention to his pastor/Bible
with any real accuracy. He almost reminds me of a band student I had
about 15 years ago. 12 years old, and was *convinced* that the sky was purple! I am not making this up.
In article <Qw_yP.411819$EYs7.384035@fx12.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 3/8/2025 04:22, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
I'm still not convinced that he's paying attention to his pastor/Bible
with any real accuracy. He almost reminds me of a band student I had
about 15 years ago. 12 years old, and was *convinced* that the sky was
purple! I am not making this up. Came to discover why: she believes
whatever information was told to her by the first person to tell her; if
you are the second person to tell her something, and it is not what the
first person told her...you are wrong. Someone was probably joking with
her when she was little, told her the sky was purple, and that was
that....even though just going outside (or hell...look out a window) and
taking a look up would prove otherwise.
Eye problem?
In article <xn0p31z5afaz08u004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ
but, then, Verse 17 states there were only 28
Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the
statement of (14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
<face palm> Somebody clearly wasn't paying attention!
No wonder you can sit through an Agatha Christie play and not
know who did it at the end!
Yes, the BRV...!!!
You could re-read this thread again, properly... or try and work
it out using your little grey cells.
[Clue] It's on topic for this thread and if you think about it
it's a lot easier to work out than who killed the people in "And
Then There Were None".
On 9/03/2025 3:36 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:Very pricy!
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
<Snip>
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just
be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what
we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run
by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the
Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's
Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book
Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short story, "Young
Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got the entire "Galaxy..." collection in
one complied book, but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even
after living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I can't quickly
go take a look.
"18 months"!! Get some time up! I moved into this house in October,
2016, and still have some unpacking to do .... mainly Books for my
Library .... including one book which (I think/HOPE) contains over $200!!
--
Daniel70
On 9/03/2025 12:41 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p31z0hfas1ca003@post.eweka.nl>,talker noted!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Oh!! Please name some (say half a dozen) of these Episodes of "Doctor
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
What about all DW episides refering to the REformation?
Who" that refer to the Reformation, Binky!!
--
Daniel70
On 9/03/2025 3:47 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/8/2025 04:22, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
I'm still not convinced that he's paying attention to his pastor/Bible
with any real accuracy. He almost reminds me of a band student I had
about 15 years ago. 12 years old, and was *convinced* that the sky was
purple! I am not making this up.
First time I've ever heard of such a thing .... but could it possible be
due to a defect in the Eye??
--
Daniel70
On 8/03/2025 11:32 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 9:22 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
So is 'BRV' a reference to 'Binky Regal Version'??
Yes, the BRV...!!!
You could re-read this thread again, properly... or try and
work it out using your little grey cells.
[Clue] It's on topic for this thread and if you think about
it it's a lot easier to work out than who killed the people
in "And Then There Were None".
Not quite.
Or, maybe, 'Blueshirt Revised Version'??
Bingo!
However, one could wonder why SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T BELIEVE in The Bible's >story would have thier own version of The Bible!!
Well done. <claps>(.... but still can't work out who did all the killing!! Even after
See, you can do it if you try... :-)
discussion with one of the sisters who was there with me!!)
--
Daniel70
On 9/03/2025 12:42 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-paedophil talker noted
In article <xn0p31z5afaz08u004@post.eweka.nl>,Did YOU forget something, Binky??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
On 7/03/2025 2:27 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"BRV"??
One part lists 38 Generation from Abraham to Christ
but, then, Verse 17 states there were only 28
Generations!!
Do I believe the list of 38 Generations or the
statement of (14 + 14) 28 Generations??
The BRV says 69 generations. So take your pick.
It's all made up anyway...
<face palm> Somebody clearly wasn't paying attention!
No wonder you can sit through an Agatha Christie play and not
know who did it at the end!
Yes, the BRV...!!!
You could re-read this thread again, properly... or try and work
it out using your little grey cells.
[Clue] It's on topic for this thread and if you think about it
it's a lot easier to work out than who killed the people in "And
Then There Were None".
--
Daniel70
In article <vqjk2n$l5bo$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 3:36 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:Very pricy!
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
<Snip>
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just
be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what >>>>> we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run >>>>> by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the
Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's >>>>> Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book >>>> Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short story, "Young
Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got the entire "Galaxy..." collection in >>> one complied book, but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even
after living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I can't quickly >>> go take a look.
"18 months"!! Get some time up! I moved into this house in October,
2016, and still have some unpacking to do .... mainly Books for my
Library .... including one book which (I think/HOPE) contains over $200!!
In article <vqjkbc$l5bo$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 12:41 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p31z0hfas1ca003@post.eweka.nl>,talker noted!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile
On 8/03/2025 11:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p312i1ejqwif002@post.eweka.nl>,Invites the statement .... Prove GOD exists, Binky!!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Well if you want to make yourself into fiction ...
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We
could just be creations in somebody else's game... we just
don't know it!
Prove it.
Oh!! Please name some (say half a dozen) of these Episodes of "Doctor
Asking Dave to prove anything is a pointless exercise... life is
whatever he's been told by his pastor and is written in his
favourite book.
What about all DW episides refering to the REformation?
Who" that refer to the Reformation, Binky!!
Do you recall the Massaxre of Saint Bartholomew?
On 9/03/2025 10:22 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vqjk2n$l5bo$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 3:36 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
<Snip>
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just >>>>>>> be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what >>>>>> we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run >>>>>> by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the >>>>> Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's >>>>>> Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book >>>>> Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short story, "Young
Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got the entire "Galaxy..." collection in >>>> one complied book, but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even
after living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I can't quickly >>>> go take a look.
"18 months"!! Get some time up! I moved into this house in October,
2016, and still have some unpacking to do .... mainly Books for my
Library .... including one book which (I think/HOPE) contains over $200!! >> Very pricy!
No, probably about $6!!
--
Daniel70
In article <vqju1v$mt2r$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 10:22 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vqjk2n$l5bo$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 3:36 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
<Snip>
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just >>>>>>>> be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what >>>>>>> we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run >>>>>>> by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the >>>>>> Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's >>>>>>> Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book >>>>>> Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short story, "Young >>>>> Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got the entire "Galaxy..." collection in
one complied book, but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even >>>>> after living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I can't quickly >>>>> go take a look.
"18 months"!! Get some time up! I moved into this house in October,
2016, and still have some unpacking to do .... mainly Books for my
Library .... including one book which (I think/HOPE) contains over $200!! >>> Very pricy!
No, probably about $6!!
That makes better sense!
On 9/03/2025 11:02 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vqju1v$mt2r$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 10:22 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vqjk2n$l5bo$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 3:36 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
<Snip>
Dave, for all we know all of life could be fiction. We could just >>>>>>>>> be creations in somebody else's game... we just don't know it! >>>>>>>>There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko theories) that what >>>>>>>> we think is our lives is really a huge computer simulation being run >>>>>>>> by someone / something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those lines .... the >>>>>>> Life IS really just a Computer Program running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too much Hitchhiker's >>>>>>>> Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there was also a Book >>>>>>> Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short story, "Young >>>>>> Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got the entire "Galaxy..." >collection in
one complied book, but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even >>>>>> after living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I can't quickly >>>>>> go take a look.
"18 months"!! Get some time up! I moved into this house in October,
2016, and still have some unpacking to do .... mainly Books for my
Library .... including one book which (I think/HOPE) contains over $200!! >>>> Very pricy!
No, probably about $6!!
That makes better sense!
WHAT "makes better sense"??
--
Daniel70
In article <vqk4u2$of87$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 11:02 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vqju1v$mt2r$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 10:22 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vqjk2n$l5bo$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 3:36 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:Very pricy!
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
<Snip>
Dave, for all we know all of life could be
fiction. We could just be creations in somebody
else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko
theories) that what we think is our lives is really
a huge computer simulation being run by someone /
something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those
lines .... the Life IS really just a Computer Program
running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too
much Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there
was also a Book Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short
story, "Young Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got >>>>>>> the entire "Galaxy..." collection in one complied book,
but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even after
living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I
can't quickly go take a look.
"18 months"!! Get some time up! I moved into this house in
October, 2016, and still have some unpacking to do ....
mainly Books for my Library .... including one book which
(I think/HOPE) contains over $200!!
No, probably about $6!!
That makes better sense!
WHAT "makes better sense"?? -- Daniel70
The $6.
On 10/03/2025 5:35 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vqk4u2$of87$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70So WHAT was YOUR 'Very pricy' comment suppose to mean, Binky .... I mean
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 11:02 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vqju1v$mt2r$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 10:22 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vqjk2n$l5bo$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
<daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/03/2025 3:36 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:Very pricy!
On 3/8/2025 03:40, Daniel70 wrote:
On 8/03/2025 8:53 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-03-07 21:15:35 +0000, Blueshirt said:
<Snip>
Dave, for all we know all of life could be
fiction. We could just be creations in somebody
else's game... we just don't know it!
There is one wacko theory (among many many wacko
theories) that what we think is our lives is really
a huge computer simulation being run by someone /
something else
Wasn't there a Film Trilogy based on Books along those
lines .... the Life IS really just a Computer Program
running its course!!
... which sounds like someone has been reading too
much Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
I've read Book 5 of the Trilogy .... and I think there
was also a Book Six!!
I think the Book 6 you're thinking of is really a short
story, "Young Zaphod Plays it Safe". I've got >>>>>>>> the entire "Galaxy..." collection in one complied book,
but it's still packed in a box somewhere that even after
living here for 18 months I haven't unpacked....so I
can't quickly go take a look.
"18 months"!! Get some time up! I moved into this house in
October, 2016, and still have some unpacking to do ....
mainly Books for my Library .... including one book which
(I think/HOPE) contains over $200!!
No, probably about $6!!
That makes better sense!
WHAT "makes better sense"?? -- Daniel70
The $6.
apart from just increasing YOUR All-Important Precious Post Count, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 167:30:25 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,533 |
