• Doctor Who Into 2026

    From Theory11@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 6 04:55:46 2025
    I am hearing that following Ncuti Gatwa's departure from the show Doctor
    Who is to continue next year with three or four special episodes
    featuring David Tennant as The Doctor. These special episodes will
    follow on from the events in the War Between the Land and the Sea
    spin-off series due to air later this year on D+. The 14th Doctor's
    companion for these special episodes will be Rose Noble, played by
    Yasmin Finney. Bad Wolf TV are hoping that Catherine Tate will reprise
    her role as Donna Noble in some of the episodes.

    Currently only three Doctor Who specials are pencilled in for 2026;
    Easter, Halloween & Xmas. If extra funding comes through from D+ - or
    another partner - a fourth special episode could be added to the
    schedule. Possibly New Years Eve/Day. There will be no series three next
    year. The special episodes are to fill the gap and are being viewed
    within the BBC as a better option than putting the show on hiatus with
    all the negative publicity that would then en-sue for one of its
    flag-ship television programmes.

    It is also rumoured that Russell T Davies will leave the show after the specials.

    My source is not God - usually she is fairly reliable though.

    --
    https://www.theory11.com/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to card.master@bee92.invalid.com on Thu Mar 6 12:12:32 2025
    In article <ca41906267c386e99a9c83c5935004db@www.novabbs.com>,
    Theory11 <card.master@bee92.invalid.com> wrote:
    I am hearing that following Ncuti Gatwa's departure from the show Doctor
    Who is to continue next year with three or four special episodes
    featuring David Tennant as The Doctor. These special episodes will
    follow on from the events in the War Between the Land and the Sea
    spin-off series due to air later this year on D+. The 14th Doctor's
    companion for these special episodes will be Rose Noble, played by
    Yasmin Finney. Bad Wolf TV are hoping that Catherine Tate will reprise
    her role as Donna Noble in some of the episodes.

    Currently only three Doctor Who specials are pencilled in for 2026;
    Easter, Halloween & Xmas. If extra funding comes through from D+ - or
    another partner - a fourth special episode could be added to the
    schedule. Possibly New Years Eve/Day. There will be no series three next >year. The special episodes are to fill the gap and are being viewed
    within the BBC as a better option than putting the show on hiatus with
    all the negative publicity that would then en-sue for one of its
    flag-ship television programmes.

    It is also rumoured that Russell T Davies will leave the show after the >specials.

    My source is not God - usually she is fairly reliable though.

    How you are correct.


    --
    https://www.theory11.com/


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 6 14:55:50 2025
    Theory11 wrote:

    I am hearing that following Ncuti Gatwa's departure from the
    show Doctor Who is to continue next year with three or four
    special episodes featuring David Tennant as The Doctor. These
    special episodes will follow on from the events in the War
    Between the Land and the Sea spin-off series due to air later
    this year on D+. The 14th Doctor's companion for these special
    episodes will be Rose Noble, played by Yasmin Finney. Bad Wolf
    TV are hoping that Catherine Tate will reprise her role as
    Donna Noble in some of the episodes.

    Currently only three Doctor Who specials are pencilled in for
    2026; Easter, Halloween & Xmas. If extra funding comes through
    from D+ - or another partner - a fourth special episode could
    be added to the schedule. Possibly New Years Eve/Day. There
    will be no series three next year. The special episodes are to
    fill the gap and are being viewed within the BBC as a better
    option than putting the show on hiatus with all the negative
    publicity that would then en-sue for one of its flag-ship
    television programmes.

    It is also rumoured that Russell T Davies will leave the show
    after the specials.

    That's the problem when there's an info vacuum of any sort with
    the wall-to-wall information society that we have these days...
    it just enables the rumour mills to go into overdrive. Some
    rumours will be right, some will be wrong. But with the variety
    of info out there they can't ALL be right!

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their big
    shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who" is after
    S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just enables the
    YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no right to know
    anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we know so little about
    the show's future.

    My source is not God - usually she is fairly reliable though.

    No smoke without fire and all that...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Mar 7 10:46:52 2025
    On 2025-03-06 14:55:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:

    Theory11 wrote:

    I am hearing that following Ncuti Gatwa's departure from the
    show Doctor Who is to continue next year with three or four
    special episodes featuring David Tennant as The Doctor. These
    special episodes will follow on from the events in the War
    Between the Land and the Sea spin-off series due to air later
    this year on D+. The 14th Doctor's companion for these special
    episodes will be Rose Noble, played by Yasmin Finney. Bad Wolf
    TV are hoping that Catherine Tate will reprise her role as
    Donna Noble in some of the episodes.

    Currently only three Doctor Who specials are pencilled in for
    2026; Easter, Halloween & Xmas. If extra funding comes through
    from D+ - or another partner - a fourth special episode could
    be added to the schedule. Possibly New Years Eve/Day. There
    will be no series three next year. The special episodes are to
    fill the gap and are being viewed within the BBC as a better
    option than putting the show on hiatus with all the negative
    publicity that would then en-sue for one of its flag-ship
    television programmes.

    It is also rumoured that Russell T Davies will leave the show
    after the specials.

    That's the problem when there's an info vacuum of any sort with
    the wall-to-wall information society that we have these days...
    it just enables the rumour mills to go into overdrive. Some
    rumours will be right, some will be wrong. But with the variety
    of info out there they can't ALL be right!

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their big
    shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who" is after
    S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just enables the
    YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no right to know
    anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we know so little about
    the show's future.

    It's extremely rare for any business to announce what their future
    plans are until they are ready to do so, which is usually not long
    before the product / service is ready to launch. If they did, every
    competitior out there would try to get in earlier to get the customers.
    Plus, with constant changes in the world, announced plans may well have
    to be altered or cancelled, which then annoys the customers - Apple,
    for example, learnt this the hard way by announcing their wireless
    power mat ... which was delayed and then cancelled.

    Occasionally you do get a brief report, for example "Call the Midwife"
    being renewed for 2025 and 2026, but no other information about it.
    Most shows only work on a basis of the next season or two. Very few
    have commitments for more than that.

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy and is
    waiting to see how well or not this new season does before making any
    decision, which then means the BBC can't make a decision /
    announcement. Just one more issue to add to the pile of problams with
    the Disney agreement.




    My source is not God - usually she is fairly reliable though.

    No smoke without fire and all that...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Your Name on Thu Mar 6 22:14:12 2025
    Your Name wrote:

    On 2025-03-06 14:55:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their
    big shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who"
    is after S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just
    enables the YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no
    right to know anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we
    know so little about the show's future.

    It's extremely rare for any business to announce what their
    future plans are until they are ready to do so, which is
    usually not long before the product / service is ready to
    launch. If they did, every competitior out there would try to
    get in earlier to get the customers. Plus, with constant
    changes in the world, announced plans may well have to be
    altered or cancelled, which then annoys the customers - Apple,
    for example, learnt this the hard way by announcing their
    wireless power mat ... which was delayed and then cancelled.

    Occasionally you do get a brief report, for example "Call the
    Midwife" being renewed for 2025 and 2026, but no other
    information about it. Most shows only work on a basis of the
    next season or two. Very few have commitments for more than
    that.

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't
    make a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add to
    the pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one of
    its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo, I'd
    like to think there is a plan B.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Mar 7 00:49:18 2025
    In article <xn0p2zduocqpz3z006@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Theory11 wrote:

    I am hearing that following Ncuti Gatwa's departure from the
    show Doctor Who is to continue next year with three or four
    special episodes featuring David Tennant as The Doctor. These
    special episodes will follow on from the events in the War
    Between the Land and the Sea spin-off series due to air later
    this year on D+. The 14th Doctor's companion for these special
    episodes will be Rose Noble, played by Yasmin Finney. Bad Wolf
    TV are hoping that Catherine Tate will reprise her role as
    Donna Noble in some of the episodes.

    Currently only three Doctor Who specials are pencilled in for
    2026; Easter, Halloween & Xmas. If extra funding comes through
    from D+ - or another partner - a fourth special episode could
    be added to the schedule. Possibly New Years Eve/Day. There
    will be no series three next year. The special episodes are to
    fill the gap and are being viewed within the BBC as a better
    option than putting the show on hiatus with all the negative
    publicity that would then en-sue for one of its flag-ship
    television programmes.

    It is also rumoured that Russell T Davies will leave the show
    after the specials.

    That's the problem when there's an info vacuum of any sort with
    the wall-to-wall information society that we have these days...
    it just enables the rumour mills to go into overdrive. Some
    rumours will be right, some will be wrong. But with the variety
    of info out there they can't ALL be right!

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their big
    shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who" is after
    S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just enables the
    YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no right to know
    anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we know so little about
    the show's future.

    My source is not God - usually she is fairly reliable though.

    No smoke without fire and all that...

    just like Noel Glynn.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to YourName@YourISP.com on Fri Mar 7 00:55:23 2025
    In article <vqd54c$35c86$1@dont-email.me>,
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 14:55:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:

    Theory11 wrote:

    I am hearing that following Ncuti Gatwa's departure from the
    show Doctor Who is to continue next year with three or four
    special episodes featuring David Tennant as The Doctor. These
    special episodes will follow on from the events in the War
    Between the Land and the Sea spin-off series due to air later
    this year on D+. The 14th Doctor's companion for these special
    episodes will be Rose Noble, played by Yasmin Finney. Bad Wolf
    TV are hoping that Catherine Tate will reprise her role as
    Donna Noble in some of the episodes.

    Currently only three Doctor Who specials are pencilled in for
    2026; Easter, Halloween & Xmas. If extra funding comes through
    from D+ - or another partner - a fourth special episode could
    be added to the schedule. Possibly New Years Eve/Day. There
    will be no series three next year. The special episodes are to
    fill the gap and are being viewed within the BBC as a better
    option than putting the show on hiatus with all the negative
    publicity that would then en-sue for one of its flag-ship
    television programmes.

    It is also rumoured that Russell T Davies will leave the show
    after the specials.

    That's the problem when there's an info vacuum of any sort with
    the wall-to-wall information society that we have these days...
    it just enables the rumour mills to go into overdrive. Some
    rumours will be right, some will be wrong. But with the variety
    of info out there they can't ALL be right!

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their big
    shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who" is after
    S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just enables the
    YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no right to know
    anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we know so little about
    the show's future.

    It's extremely rare for any business to announce what their future
    plans are until they are ready to do so, which is usually not long
    before the product / service is ready to launch. If they did, every >competitior out there would try to get in earlier to get the customers.
    Plus, with constant changes in the world, announced plans may well have
    to be altered or cancelled, which then annoys the customers - Apple,
    for example, learnt this the hard way by announcing their wireless
    power mat ... which was delayed and then cancelled.

    Occasionally you do get a brief report, for example "Call the Midwife"
    being renewed for 2025 and 2026, but no other information about it.
    Most shows only work on a basis of the next season or two. Very few
    have commitments for more than that.

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy and is
    waiting to see how well or not this new season does before making any >decision, which then means the BBC can't make a decision /
    announcement. Just one more issue to add to the pile of problams with
    the Disney agreement.




    My source is not God - usually she is fairly reliable though.

    No smoke without fire and all that...



    Contradictions.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Mar 7 00:55:49 2025
    In article <xn0p2zpczd688k8000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:

    On 2025-03-06 14:55:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their
    big shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who"
    is after S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just
    enables the YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no
    right to know anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we
    know so little about the show's future.

    It's extremely rare for any business to announce what their
    future plans are until they are ready to do so, which is
    usually not long before the product / service is ready to
    launch. If they did, every competitior out there would try to
    get in earlier to get the customers. Plus, with constant
    changes in the world, announced plans may well have to be
    altered or cancelled, which then annoys the customers - Apple,
    for example, learnt this the hard way by announcing their
    wireless power mat ... which was delayed and then cancelled.

    Occasionally you do get a brief report, for example "Call the
    Midwife" being renewed for 2025 and 2026, but no other
    information about it. Most shows only work on a basis of the
    next season or two. Very few have commitments for more than
    that.

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't
    make a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add to
    the pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one of
    its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo, I'd
    like to think there is a plan B.

    A new Showrunner with a new vision?
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Mar 7 18:32:43 2025
    On 2025-03-07 05:31:44 +0000, Your Name said:

    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 14:55:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their
    big shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who"
    is after S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just
    enables the YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no
    right to know anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we
    know so little about the show's future.

    It's extremely rare for any business to announce what their
    future plans are until they are ready to do so, which is
    usually not long before the product / service is ready to
    launch. If they did, every competitior out there would try to
    get in earlier to get the customers. Plus, with constant
    changes in the world, announced plans may well have to be
    altered or cancelled, which then annoys the customers - Apple,
    for example, learnt this the hard way by announcing their
    wireless power mat ... which was delayed and then cancelled.

    Occasionally you do get a brief report, for example "Call the
    Midwife" being renewed for 2025 and 2026, but no other
    information about it. Most shows only work on a basis of the
    next season or two. Very few have commitments for more than
    that.

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't
    make a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add to
    the pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one of
    its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo, I'd
    like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce anything
    until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the BBC gets fed up
    with the wait and simply decides to tell Disney to "get lost" of
    course, then the BBC can announce whatever other option they've chosen.

    This hamstringing of the BBC is of course yet another reason why going
    with Disney was a rather silly choice in the first place.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Mar 7 18:31:44 2025
    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 14:55:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their
    big shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who"
    is after S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just
    enables the YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no
    right to know anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we
    know so little about the show's future.

    It's extremely rare for any business to announce what their
    future plans are until they are ready to do so, which is
    usually not long before the product / service is ready to
    launch. If they did, every competitior out there would try to
    get in earlier to get the customers. Plus, with constant
    changes in the world, announced plans may well have to be
    altered or cancelled, which then annoys the customers - Apple,
    for example, learnt this the hard way by announcing their
    wireless power mat ... which was delayed and then cancelled.

    Occasionally you do get a brief report, for example "Call the
    Midwife" being renewed for 2025 and 2026, but no other
    information about it. Most shows only work on a basis of the
    next season or two. Very few have commitments for more than
    that.

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't
    make a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add to
    the pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one of
    its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo, I'd
    like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce anything
    until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the BBC gets fed up
    with the wait and simply decides to tell Disney to "get lost" of
    course, then the BBC can announce whatever other option they've chosen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to YourName@YourISP.com on Fri Mar 7 07:01:28 2025
    In article <vqe0dq$3d2ud$1@dont-email.me>,
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2025-03-07 05:31:44 +0000, Your Name said:

    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 14:55:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their
    big shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who"
    is after S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just
    enables the YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no
    right to know anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we
    know so little about the show's future.

    It's extremely rare for any business to announce what their
    future plans are until they are ready to do so, which is
    usually not long before the product / service is ready to
    launch. If they did, every competitior out there would try to
    get in earlier to get the customers. Plus, with constant
    changes in the world, announced plans may well have to be
    altered or cancelled, which then annoys the customers - Apple,
    for example, learnt this the hard way by announcing their
    wireless power mat ... which was delayed and then cancelled.

    Occasionally you do get a brief report, for example "Call the
    Midwife" being renewed for 2025 and 2026, but no other
    information about it. Most shows only work on a basis of the
    next season or two. Very few have commitments for more than
    that.

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't
    make a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add to
    the pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one of
    its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo, I'd
    like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce anything
    until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the BBC gets fed up
    with the wait and simply decides to tell Disney to "get lost" of
    course, then the BBC can announce whatever other option they've chosen.

    This hamstringing of the BBC is of course yet another reason why going
    with Disney was a rather silly choice in the first place.



    This is just not really Doctor Who;.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to YourName@YourISP.com on Fri Mar 7 07:00:28 2025
    In article <vqe0c0$3d2u0$1@dont-email.me>,
    Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 14:55:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:

    Normally the BBC are in your face with PR stuff about their
    big shows. Not knowing what the situation with "Doctor Who"
    is after S15/S2 - which premieres in five weeks time - just
    enables the YouTube brigade to do their thing. We have no
    right to know anything, but in 2025 it is strange that we
    know so little about the show's future.

    It's extremely rare for any business to announce what their
    future plans are until they are ready to do so, which is
    usually not long before the product / service is ready to
    launch. If they did, every competitior out there would try to
    get in earlier to get the customers. Plus, with constant
    changes in the world, announced plans may well have to be
    altered or cancelled, which then annoys the customers - Apple,
    for example, learnt this the hard way by announcing their
    wireless power mat ... which was delayed and then cancelled.

    Occasionally you do get a brief report, for example "Call the
    Midwife" being renewed for 2025 and 2026, but no other
    information about it. Most shows only work on a basis of the
    next season or two. Very few have commitments for more than
    that.

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't
    make a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add to
    the pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one of
    its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo, I'd
    like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce anything
    until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the BBC gets fed up
    with the wait and simply decides to tell Disney to "get lost" of
    course, then the BBC can announce whatever other option they've chosen.




    Best option.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Fri Mar 7 23:08:24 2025
    On 6/03/2025 11:12 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <ca41906267c386e99a9c83c5935004db@www.novabbs.com>,
    Theory11 <card.master@bee92.invalid.com> wrote:
    I am hearing that following Ncuti Gatwa's departure from the show Doctor
    Who is to continue next year with three or four special episodes
    featuring David Tennant as The Doctor. These special episodes will
    follow on from the events in the War Between the Land and the Sea
    spin-off series due to air later this year on D+. The 14th Doctor's
    companion for these special episodes will be Rose Noble, played by
    Yasmin Finney. Bad Wolf TV are hoping that Catherine Tate will reprise
    her role as Donna Noble in some of the episodes.

    Currently only three Doctor Who specials are pencilled in for 2026;
    Easter, Halloween & Xmas. If extra funding comes through from D+ - or
    another partner - a fourth special episode could be added to the
    schedule. Possibly New Years Eve/Day. There will be no series three next
    year. The special episodes are to fill the gap and are being viewed
    within the BBC as a better option than putting the show on hiatus with
    all the negative publicity that would then en-sue for one of its
    flag-ship television programmes.

    It is also rumoured that Russell T Davies will leave the show after the
    specials.

    My source is not God - usually she is fairly reliable though.

    How you are correct.

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a Woman (she)!!
    YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Your Name on Fri Mar 7 14:21:19 2025
    Your Name wrote:

    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't
    happy and is waiting to see how well or not this new
    season does before making any decision, which then means
    the BBC can't make a decision / announcement. Just one
    more issue to add to the pile of problams with the Disney
    agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one
    of its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo,
    I'd like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce
    anything until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the
    BBC gets fed up with the wait and simply decides to tell
    Disney to "get lost" of course, then the BBC can announce
    whatever other option they've chosen.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have options on the
    table. As I said, sitting in limbo until S15 finished airing in
    June wouldn't make a lot of sense. Disney buying more episodes
    might be plan A, but I'm sure there's a plan B if they don't...
    and maybe even a plan C.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Fri Mar 7 14:21:18 2025
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <xn0p2zpczd688k8000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't
    make a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add
    to the pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one
    of its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo,
    I'd like to think there is a plan B.

    A new Showrunner with a new vision?

    No Dave, that's not the point I was making.

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes of
    "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether Disney will
    invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody at the BBC or
    Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan for either
    scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at the BBC to just
    be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until June. RTD and the
    Doctor Who production office couldn't work that way.

    So, there has to be plans of some sort and some draft scripts
    around the place in case they will be needed. RTD & Co will
    obviously be hoping that they will. The nay-sayers will be
    hoping they won't and "Doctor Who" is cancelled! Disney not
    buying more
    episodes doesn't necessarily mean the end of Doctor Who. As if
    that was the case, it would have been a silly position for the
    BBC to get itself in to with one of it's biggest TV shows.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 7 14:31:40 2025
    Daniel70 wrote:


    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    What if it was to turn out that Janesus was actually a black
    woman with big tits? Would the fundamentalist brigade be able to
    handle that? Or more aptly, would they be able to handle those?

    Unfortunately we will never know for sure...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Fri Mar 7 15:30:11 2025
    In article <vqenjd$3h9fr$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 6/03/2025 11:12 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <ca41906267c386e99a9c83c5935004db@www.novabbs.com>,
    Theory11 <card.master@bee92.invalid.com> wrote:
    I am hearing that following Ncuti Gatwa's departure from the show Doctor >>> Who is to continue next year with three or four special episodes
    featuring David Tennant as The Doctor. These special episodes will
    follow on from the events in the War Between the Land and the Sea
    spin-off series due to air later this year on D+. The 14th Doctor's
    companion for these special episodes will be Rose Noble, played by
    Yasmin Finney. Bad Wolf TV are hoping that Catherine Tate will reprise
    her role as Donna Noble in some of the episodes.

    Currently only three Doctor Who specials are pencilled in for 2026;
    Easter, Halloween & Xmas. If extra funding comes through from D+ - or
    another partner - a fourth special episode could be added to the
    schedule. Possibly New Years Eve/Day. There will be no series three next >>> year. The special episodes are to fill the gap and are being viewed
    within the BBC as a better option than putting the show on hiatus with
    all the negative publicity that would then en-sue for one of its
    flag-ship television programmes.

    It is also rumoured that Russell T Davies will leave the show after the
    specials.

    My source is not God - usually she is fairly reliable though.

    How you are correct.

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a Woman (she)!!
    ^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
    YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??
    ^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Mar 7 15:30:44 2025
    In article <xn0p30r3ge48x1z000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <xn0p2zpczd688k8000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't
    make a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add
    to the pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one
    of its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo,
    I'd like to think there is a plan B.

    A new Showrunner with a new vision?

    No Dave, that's not the point I was making.

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes of
    "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether Disney will
    invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody at the BBC or
    Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan for either
    scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at the BBC to just
    be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until June. RTD and the
    Doctor Who production office couldn't work that way.

    So, there has to be plans of some sort and some draft scripts
    around the place in case they will be needed. RTD & Co will
    obviously be hoping that they will. The nay-sayers will be
    hoping they won't and "Doctor Who" is cancelled! Disney not
    buying more
    episodes doesn't necessarily mean the end of Doctor Who. As if
    that was the case, it would have been a silly position for the
    BBC to get itself in to with one of it's biggest TV shows.

    To me, the impossible is alsways worth rescuing.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Mar 7 15:31:34 2025
    In article <xn0p30r6de4d4ob001@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:

    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't
    happy and is waiting to see how well or not this new
    season does before making any decision, which then means
    the BBC can't make a decision / announcement. Just one
    more issue to add to the pile of problams with the Disney
    agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one
    of its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo,
    I'd like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce
    anything until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the
    BBC gets fed up with the wait and simply decides to tell
    Disney to "get lost" of course, then the BBC can announce
    whatever other option they've chosen.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have options on the
    table. As I said, sitting in limbo until S15 finished airing in
    June wouldn't make a lot of sense. Disney buying more episodes
    might be plan A, but I'm sure there's a plan B if they don't...
    and maybe even a plan C.

    REcall when the BBC and CBC partners in the mid 2000s.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Fri Mar 7 15:33:48 2025
    In article <xn0p30ru2e5bdm6000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:


    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    ^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??
    ^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    What if it was to turn out that Janesus was actually a black
    woman with big tits? Would the fundamentalist brigade be able to
    handle that? Or more aptly, would they be able to handle those?

    Unfortunately we will never know for sure...

    What about Dannyboy meets Noel Glynn.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Fri Mar 7 21:11:39 2025
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <xn0p30r3ge48x1z000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes
    of "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether
    Disney will invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody
    at the BBC or Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan
    for either scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at
    the BBC to just be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until
    June. RTD and the Doctor Who production office couldn't work
    that way.

    So, there has to be plans of some sort and some draft scripts
    around the place in case they will be needed. RTD & Co will
    obviously be hoping that they will. The nay-sayers will be
    hoping they won't and "Doctor Who" is cancelled! Disney not
    buying more episodes doesn't necessarily mean the end
    of Doctor Who. As if that was the case, it would have
    been a silly position for the BBC to get itself in to
    with one of it's biggest TV shows.

    To me, the impossible is alsways worth rescuing.

    I am a Doctor Who fan and have been since 1972... so I don't
    want to see the show cancelled. I accept it won't always be to
    my liking, but if it ever got to the stage where I REALLY didn't
    like Doctor Who anymore I would just switch it off and hope that
    others did get some enjoyment out of it. I would take no joy
    from seeing the BBC cancel the show again.

    So yes, whatever situation "Doctor Who" is in... I hope it is
    worth rescuing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sat Mar 8 00:43:06 2025
    In article <xn0p3127bejbdw6000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <xn0p30r3ge48x1z000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes
    of "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether
    Disney will invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody
    at the BBC or Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan
    for either scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at
    the BBC to just be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until
    June. RTD and the Doctor Who production office couldn't work
    that way.

    So, there has to be plans of some sort and some draft scripts
    around the place in case they will be needed. RTD & Co will
    obviously be hoping that they will. The nay-sayers will be
    hoping they won't and "Doctor Who" is cancelled! Disney not
    buying more episodes doesn't necessarily mean the end
    of Doctor Who. As if that was the case, it would have
    been a silly position for the BBC to get itself in to
    with one of it's biggest TV shows.

    To me, the impossible is alsways worth rescuing.

    I am a Doctor Who fan and have been since 1972... so I don't
    want to see the show cancelled. I accept it won't always be to
    my liking, but if it ever got to the stage where I REALLY didn't
    like Doctor Who anymore I would just switch it off and hope that
    others did get some enjoyment out of it. I would take no joy
    from seeing the BBC cancel the show again.

    So yes, whatever situation "Doctor Who" is in... I hope it is
    worth rescuing.


    Get a showrunner that will retcon the timeless child.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sat Mar 8 20:52:31 2025
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he Rose
    into Heaven!!

    What if it was to turn out that Janesus was actually a black
    woman with big tits? Would the fundamentalist brigade be able to
    handle that? Or more aptly, would they be able to handle those?

    Well, I don't know about a "black woman with big tits", but I reckon he
    would have been Black or, at least, Dark Skinned like a lot of people
    from that neck of the World.

    Unfortunately we will never know for sure...

    Well, you, Blueshirt, could take what Binky reckons as Gospel!!
    (Snicker!! Snicker!!)
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sat Mar 8 20:59:28 2025
    On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p2zpczd688k8000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't make
    a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add to the
    pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one of
    its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo, I'd
    like to think there is a plan B.

    A new Showrunner with a new vision?

    No Dave, that's not the point I was making.

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2 airs
    before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes of "Doctor
    Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether Disney will invest
    further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody at the BBC or Bad Wolf
    Studios MUST have a contingency plan for either scenario. It wouldn't
    make sense for the bods at the BBC to just be sitting around
    twiddling its thumbs until June. RTD and the Doctor Who production
    office couldn't work that way.

    What about the other Series that Disney was supposedly financing ....
    'The SeaDevils' or some such?? Wouldn't that give BBC/Bad Wolf a bit of
    time to get a third Series in the Can??

    So, there has to be plans of some sort and some draft scripts around
    the place in case they will be needed. RTD & Co will obviously be
    hoping that they will. The nay-sayers will be hoping they won't and
    "Doctor Who" is cancelled! Disney not buying more episodes doesn't necessarily mean the end of Doctor Who. As if that was the case, it
    would have been a silly position for the BBC to get itself in to with
    one of it's biggest TV shows.

    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 8 10:22:54 2025
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    Yes, but I've also read "The Murder of Roger Ackroyd" and
    "Endless Night" so I know all about unreliable narrators!

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was
    after he Rose into Heaven!!

    Only if you are the type of persons that believes everything
    they read!

    I like to question things...

    Well, you, Blueshirt, could take what Binky reckons as
    Gospel!! (Snicker!! Snicker!!)

    I'd like something a little bit more substantial that that...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Sat Mar 8 21:24:13 2025
    On 8/03/2025 2:31 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p30r6de4d4ob001@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't
    happy and is waiting to see how well or not this new
    season does before making any decision, which then means
    the BBC can't make a decision / announcement. Just one
    more issue to add to the pile of problams with the Disney
    agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one
    of its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo,
    I'd like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce
    anything until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the
    BBC gets fed up with the wait and simply decides to tell
    Disney to "get lost" of course, then the BBC can announce
    whatever other option they've chosen.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have options on the
    table. As I said, sitting in limbo until S15 finished airing in
    June wouldn't make a lot of sense. Disney buying more episodes
    might be plan A, but I'm sure there's a plan B if they don't...
    and maybe even a plan C.

    REcall when the BBC and CBC partners in the mid 2000s.

    WHAT?? So it wasn't JUST BBC that restarted 'Doctor who' ... It was BBC
    *AND* CBC that rejuvenated 'Doctor Who'!! (Snicker!! Snicker!!)

    Well done CBC!! ;-P
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 8 10:30:11 2025
    Daniel70 wrote:

    On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes
    of "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether
    Disney will invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody
    at the BBC or Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan
    for either scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at
    the BBC to just be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until
    June. RTD and the Doctor Who production office couldn't work
    that way.

    What about the other Series that Disney was supposedly
    financing .... 'The SeaDevils' or some such?? Wouldn't that
    give BBC/Bad Wolf a bit of time to get a third Series in the
    Can??

    "The War Between the Land and the Sea".

    That's either done or is in the process of being done as it's
    scheduled to air around November/December. Disney+ have already
    mentioned that in their 2025 schedule.

    That spin-off is the last five episodes of the 26 episode "first
    order" (RTD's terminology) from Disney as part of their
    partnership with the BBC.

    A Doctor Who Christmas 'special' for 2025 was not part of the
    "first order"... so if there is going to be one this year, Bad
    Wolf would want to be making some sort of start on it by the
    summer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sat Mar 8 23:39:05 2025
    On 8/03/2025 9:30 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes
    of "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether
    Disney will invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody
    at the BBC or Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan
    for either scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at
    the BBC to just be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until
    June. RTD and the Doctor Who production office couldn't work
    that way.

    What about the other Series that Disney was supposedly
    financing .... 'The SeaDevils' or some such?? Wouldn't that
    give BBC/Bad Wolf a bit of time to get a third Series in the
    Can??

    "The War Between the Land and the Sea".

    That's the one!!

    That's either done or is in the process of being done as it's
    scheduled to air around November/December. Disney+ have already
    mentioned that in their 2025 schedule.

    It always intrigues me why things have to be made/completed so far ahead
    ..... I mean there is an entire (Northern) Summer and Autumn going
    begging before these shows will be shown. Maybe if they were getting a Theatrical release before going to T.V. .... but we all know THAT's not
    gunna happen!!

    That spin-off is the last five episodes of the 26 episode "first
    order" (RTD's terminology) from Disney as part of their
    partnership with the BBC.

    A Doctor Who Christmas 'special' for 2025 was not part of the
    "first order"... so if there is going to be one this year, Bad
    Wolf would want to be making some sort of start on it by the
    summer.

    Plenty of time!!
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sat Mar 8 13:38:47 2025
    In article <vqh40i$36h0$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he Rose
    into Heaven!!

    tose not Rose.


    What if it was to turn out that Janesus was actually a black
    woman with big tits? Would the fundamentalist brigade be able to
    handle that? Or more aptly, would they be able to handle those?

    Well, I don't know about a "black woman with big tits", but I reckon he
    would have been Black or, at least, Dark Skinned like a lot of people
    from that neck of the World.

    Unfortunately we will never know for sure...

    Well, you, Blueshirt, could take what Binky reckons as Gospel!!
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted! >(Snicker!! Snicker!!)
    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sat Mar 8 13:39:23 2025
    In article <vqh4dk$38k2$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p2zpczd688k8000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't happy
    and is waiting to see how well or not this new season does
    before making any decision, which then means the BBC can't make
    a decision / announcement. Just one more issue to add to the
    pile of problams with the Disney agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one of
    its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo, I'd
    like to think there is a plan B.

    A new Showrunner with a new vision?

    No Dave, that's not the point I was making.

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2 airs
    before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes of "Doctor
    Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether Disney will invest
    further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody at the BBC or Bad Wolf
    Studios MUST have a contingency plan for either scenario. It wouldn't
    make sense for the bods at the BBC to just be sitting around
    twiddling its thumbs until June. RTD and the Doctor Who production
    office couldn't work that way.

    What about the other Series that Disney was supposedly financing ....
    'The SeaDevils' or some such?? Wouldn't that give BBC/Bad Wolf a bit of
    time to get a third Series in the Can??


    Inquiring minds are waiting.

    So, there has to be plans of some sort and some draft scripts around
    the place in case they will be needed. RTD & Co will obviously be
    hoping that they will. The nay-sayers will be hoping they won't and
    "Doctor Who" is cancelled! Disney not buying more episodes doesn't
    necessarily mean the end of Doctor Who. As if that was the case, it
    would have been a silly position for the BBC to get itself in to with
    one of it's biggest TV shows.

    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sat Mar 8 13:42:53 2025
    In article <xn0p31zo0fbkyqa005@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    Yes, but I've also read "The Murder of Roger Ackroyd" and
    "Endless Night" so I know all about unreliable narrators!

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was
    after he Rose into Heaven!!

    Only if you are the type of persons that believes everything
    they read!

    I like to question things...

    Good man!


    Well, you, Blueshirt, could take what Binky reckons as
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
    Gospel!! (Snicker!! Snicker!!)

    I'd like something a little bit more substantial that that...



    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sat Mar 8 13:43:32 2025
    In article <vqh5s1$3i51$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 2:31 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p30r6de4d4ob001@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't
    happy and is waiting to see how well or not this new
    season does before making any decision, which then means
    the BBC can't make a decision / announcement. Just one
    more issue to add to the pile of problams with the Disney
    agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one
    of its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo,
    I'd like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce
    anything until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the
    BBC gets fed up with the wait and simply decides to tell
    Disney to "get lost" of course, then the BBC can announce
    whatever other option they've chosen.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have options on the
    table. As I said, sitting in limbo until S15 finished airing in
    June wouldn't make a lot of sense. Disney buying more episodes
    might be plan A, but I'm sure there's a plan B if they don't...
    and maybe even a plan C.

    REcall when the BBC and CBC partners in the mid 2000s.

    WHAT?? So it wasn't JUST BBC that restarted 'Doctor who' ... It was BBC
    *AND* CBC that rejuvenated 'Doctor Who'!! (Snicker!! Snicker!!)

    Well done CBC!! ;-P

    Yes! Check you early Tennant and Fill Eccleston Eras!

    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sat Mar 8 13:44:03 2025
    In article <xn0p3200sfc3hd0006@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes
    of "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether
    Disney will invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody
    at the BBC or Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan
    for either scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at
    the BBC to just be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until
    June. RTD and the Doctor Who production office couldn't work
    that way.

    What about the other Series that Disney was supposedly
    financing .... 'The SeaDevils' or some such?? Wouldn't that
    give BBC/Bad Wolf a bit of time to get a third Series in the
    Can??

    "The War Between the Land and the Sea".

    That's either done or is in the process of being done as it's
    scheduled to air around November/December. Disney+ have already
    mentioned that in their 2025 schedule.

    That spin-off is the last five episodes of the 26 episode "first
    order" (RTD's terminology) from Disney as part of their
    partnership with the BBC.

    A Doctor Who Christmas 'special' for 2025 was not part of the
    "first order"... so if there is going to be one this year, Bad
    Wolf would want to be making some sort of start on it by the
    summer.

    We hope!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sat Mar 8 13:50:54 2025
    In article <vqhdos$53ia$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 9:30 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes
    of "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether
    Disney will invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody
    at the BBC or Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan
    for either scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at
    the BBC to just be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until
    June. RTD and the Doctor Who production office couldn't work
    that way.

    What about the other Series that Disney was supposedly
    financing .... 'The SeaDevils' or some such?? Wouldn't that
    give BBC/Bad Wolf a bit of time to get a third Series in the
    Can??

    "The War Between the Land and the Sea".

    That's the one!!

    That's either done or is in the process of being done as it's
    scheduled to air around November/December. Disney+ have already
    mentioned that in their 2025 schedule.

    It always intrigues me why things have to be made/completed so far ahead >..... I mean there is an entire (Northern) Summer and Autumn going
    begging before these shows will be shown. Maybe if they were getting a >Theatrical release before going to T.V. .... but we all know THAT's not
    gunna happen!!

    That spin-off is the last five episodes of the 26 episode "first
    order" (RTD's terminology) from Disney as part of their
    partnership with the BBC.

    A Doctor Who Christmas 'special' for 2025 was not part of the
    "first order"... so if there is going to be one this year, Bad
    Wolf would want to be making some sort of start on it by the
    summer.

    Plenty of time!!

    When was the last time you saw DW featuing David Tennant?

    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Idlehands@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 8 12:21:14 2025
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned?  <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he Rose
    into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in God's image
    then how are women created?

    If God is all things to all people how can God be confined to a single
    gender? I accept that Jesus was male but his ministry was supported financially by women.


    What if it was to turn out that Janesus was actually a black
    woman with big tits? Would the fundamentalist brigade be able to
    handle that? Or more aptly, would they be able to handle those?

    Well, I don't know about a "black woman with big tits", but I reckon he
    would have been Black or, at least, Dark Skinned like a lot of people
    from that neck of the World.

    Unfortunately we will never know for sure...

    Well, you, Blueshirt, could take what Binky reckons as Gospel!!
    (Snicker!! Snicker!!)


    --
    "Re: For Binky (word used by paedohiles to indicate their pride in
    sexual molestation) ... Bible Studies"

    The Doctor (aka binky), March 2025

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Sun Mar 9 19:57:33 2025
    On 9/03/2025 12:38 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqh40i$36h0$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he Rose
    into Heaven!!

    tose not Rose.

    Sorry!! WHAT, Binky?? Did Christ 'tose' into Heaven??

    What's 'tose' mean when it's at Home??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to Idlehands on Sun Mar 9 20:00:47 2025
    On 9/03/2025 6:21 am, Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a Woman
    (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he
    Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men!

    Of course! Men are THE only people who matter, aren't they?? ;-P

    If we made in God's image then how are women created?

    Well, every production process has some mistakes/corruptions, don't
    they?? ;-P
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Sun Mar 9 20:07:48 2025
    On 9/03/2025 12:43 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqh5s1$3i51$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 2:31 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p30r6de4d4ob001@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Your Name wrote:
    On 2025-03-06 22:14:12 +0000, Blueshirt said:
    Your Name wrote:

    Then of course there are the rumours that Disney isn't
    happy and is waiting to see how well or not this new
    season does before making any decision, which then means
    the BBC can't make a decision / announcement. Just one
    more issue to add to the pile of problams with the Disney
    agreement.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have some contingency
    plans in place to cover every option... "Doctor Who" is one
    of its biggest shows. I doubt the show is in complete limbo,
    I'd like to think there is a plan B.

    They probably do have a few options, but they can't announce
    anything until Disney decide what they're doing ... unless the
    BBC gets fed up with the wait and simply decides to tell
    Disney to "get lost" of course, then the BBC can announce
    whatever other option they've chosen.

    I'd be very surprised if the BBC didn't have options on the
    table. As I said, sitting in limbo until S15 finished airing in
    June wouldn't make a lot of sense. Disney buying more episodes
    might be plan A, but I'm sure there's a plan B if they don't...
    and maybe even a plan C.

    REcall when the BBC and CBC partners in the mid 2000s.

    WHAT?? So it wasn't JUST BBC that restarted 'Doctor who' ... It was BBC
    *AND* CBC that rejuvenated 'Doctor Who'!! (Snicker!! Snicker!!)

    Well done CBC!! ;-P

    Yes! Check you early Tennant and Fill Eccleston Eras!

    What do YOU, Binky, want me to 'Fill' the Eccleston Era with, Binky??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Sun Mar 9 20:05:17 2025
    On 9/03/2025 12:50 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqhdos$53ia$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 9:30 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes
    of "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether
    Disney will invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody
    at the BBC or Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan
    for either scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at
    the BBC to just be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until
    June. RTD and the Doctor Who production office couldn't work
    that way.

    What about the other Series that Disney was supposedly
    financing .... 'The SeaDevils' or some such?? Wouldn't that
    give BBC/Bad Wolf a bit of time to get a third Series in the
    Can??

    "The War Between the Land and the Sea".

    That's the one!!

    That's either done or is in the process of being done as it's
    scheduled to air around November/December. Disney+ have already
    mentioned that in their 2025 schedule.

    It always intrigues me why things have to be made/completed so far ahead
    ..... I mean there is an entire (Northern) Summer and Autumn going
    begging before these shows will be shown. Maybe if they were getting a
    Theatrical release before going to T.V. .... but we all know THAT's not
    gunna happen!!

    That spin-off is the last five episodes of the 26 episode "first
    order" (RTD's terminology) from Disney as part of their
    partnership with the BBC.

    A Doctor Who Christmas 'special' for 2025 was not part of the
    "first order"... so if there is going to be one this year, Bad
    Wolf would want to be making some sort of start on it by the
    summer.

    Plenty of time!!

    When was the last time you saw DW featuing David Tennant?

    Earlier this afternoon, Binky, my ABC replayed "The Family of Blood"

    Do YOU see, Binky, how most people can actually answer questions asked
    of them??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sun Mar 9 11:26:51 2025
    In article <vqjl5d$la2n$3@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 12:38 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqh40i$36h0$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he Rose
    into Heaven!!

    tose not Rose.

    Sorry!! WHAT, Binky?? Did Christ 'tose' into Heaven??
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted

    What's 'tose' mean when it's at Home??
    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sun Mar 9 11:27:17 2025
    In article <vqjlbi$lck7$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 6:21 am, Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a Woman
    (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he
    Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men!

    Of course! Men are THE only people who matter, aren't they?? ;-P

    If we made in God's image then how are women created?

    Well, every production process has some mistakes/corruptions, don't
    they?? ;-P

    Does Isaiah 55 come to mind?

    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sun Mar 9 11:28:10 2025
    In article <vqjlju$ldvd$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 12:50 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqhdos$53ia$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 9:30 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:21 am, Blueshirt wrote:

    My point is... with all this talk about waiting until S15/S2
    airs before Disney decide on whether to order more episodes
    of "Doctor Who" or not... and the BBC waiting on whether
    Disney will invest further in Doctor Who, or not... somebody
    at the BBC or Bad Wolf Studios MUST have a contingency plan
    for either scenario. It wouldn't make sense for the bods at
    the BBC to just be sitting around twiddling its thumbs until
    June. RTD and the Doctor Who production office couldn't work
    that way.

    What about the other Series that Disney was supposedly
    financing .... 'The SeaDevils' or some such?? Wouldn't that
    give BBC/Bad Wolf a bit of time to get a third Series in the
    Can??

    "The War Between the Land and the Sea".

    That's the one!!

    That's either done or is in the process of being done as it's
    scheduled to air around November/December. Disney+ have already
    mentioned that in their 2025 schedule.

    It always intrigues me why things have to be made/completed so far ahead >>> ..... I mean there is an entire (Northern) Summer and Autumn going
    begging before these shows will be shown. Maybe if they were getting a
    Theatrical release before going to T.V. .... but we all know THAT's not
    gunna happen!!

    That spin-off is the last five episodes of the 26 episode "first
    order" (RTD's terminology) from Disney as part of their
    partnership with the BBC.

    A Doctor Who Christmas 'special' for 2025 was not part of the
    "first order"... so if there is going to be one this year, Bad
    Wolf would want to be making some sort of start on it by the
    summer.

    Plenty of time!!

    When was the last time you saw DW featuing David Tennant?

    Earlier this afternoon, Binky, my ABC replayed "The Family of Blood"
    ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted

    Do YOU see, Binky, how most people can actually answer questions asked
    ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
    of them??
    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Sun Mar 9 23:02:02 2025
    On 9/03/2025 10:26 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqjl5d$la2n$3@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 12:38 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqh40i$36h0$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he Rose >>>> into Heaven!!

    tose not Rose.

    Sorry!! WHAT, Binky?? Did Christ 'tose' into Heaven??
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted

    What's 'tose' mean when it's at Home??

    Gee Wizz!! I asked a question and Binky was unable to answer it!!
    Shock!! Horror!!
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sun Mar 9 12:06:37 2025
    In article <vqjvv9$n91g$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 10:26 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqjl5d$la2n$3@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 12:38 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqh40i$36h0$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a
    Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he Rose >>>>> into Heaven!!

    tose not Rose.

    Sorry!! WHAT, Binky?? Did Christ 'tose' into Heaven??
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted

    What's 'tose' mean when it's at Home??

    Gee Wizz!! I asked a question and Binky was unable to answer it!!
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
    Shock!! Horror!!
    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Sun Mar 9 23:03:09 2025
    On 9/03/2025 10:27 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqjlbi$lck7$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 6:21 am, Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a Woman
    (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he
    Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men!

    Of course! Men are THE only people who matter, aren't they?? ;-P

    If we made in God's image then how are women created?

    Well, every production process has some mistakes/corruptions, don't
    they?? ;-P

    Does Isaiah 55 come to mind?

    Nope!! Not in the slightest!!
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sun Mar 9 12:07:34 2025
    In article <vqk01c$n91g$2@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 10:27 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqjlbi$lck7$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 6:21 am, Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is a Woman
    (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for sure?
    Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe Janesus
    transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after he
    Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men!

    Of course! Men are THE only people who matter, aren't they?? ;-P

    If we made in God's image then how are women created?

    Well, every production process has some mistakes/corruptions, don't
    they?? ;-P

    Does Isaiah 55 come to mind?

    Nope!! Not in the slightest!!
    --
    Daniel70


    Isaiah 55
    The Invitation to the Waters
    1 (SS 5:1; Rev 21:6) Ho! Everyone who thirsts,
    come to the waters;
    and you who have no money,
    come, buy and eat.
    Come, buy wine and milk
    without money and without price.
    2 (Ps 22:26; Hos 8:7) Why do you spend money for that which is not bread,
    and your labor for that which does not satisfy?
    Listen diligently to Me, and eat what is good,
    and let your soul delight itself in abundance.
    3 (Isa 61:8; Ac 13:34) Incline your ear, and come to Me.
    Listen, so that your soul may live,
    and I will make an everlasting covenant with you,
    even the sure mercies of David.
    4 (Jer 30:9; Da 9:25) See, I have given him as a witness to the people,
    a leader and commander to the people.
    5 (Isa 60:9; Ge 49:10) Surely you shall call a nation that you do not know,
    and nations that did not know you shall run to you
    because of the Lord your God,
    even the Holy One of Israel;
    for He has glorified you.
    6 (Ps 32:6; Isa 45:19 ) Seek the Lord while He may be found,
    call you upon Him while He is near.
    7 (Isa 44:22; Pr 28:13) Let the wicked forsake his way,
    and the unrighteous man his thoughts;
    and let him return to the Lord, and He will have mercy upon him,
    and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon.
    8 For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
    nor are your ways My ways,
    says the Lord.
    9 (Ps 103:11) For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
    so are My ways higher than your ways,
    and My thoughts than your thoughts.
    10 (Isa 30:23) For as the rain comes down,
    and the snow from heaven,
    and do not return there
    but water the earth
    and make it bring forth and bud
    that it may give seed to the sower and bread to the eater,
    11 (Isa 45:23; 46:10) so shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth;
    it shall not return to Me void,
    but it shall accomplish that which I please,
    and it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it.
    12 (Isa 44:23; Ps 105:43) For you shall go out with joy,
    and be led out with peace;
    the mountains and the hills
    shall break forth into singing before you,
    and all the trees of the field
    shall clap their hands.
    13 (Isa 41:19; 60:13) Instead of the thorn shall come up the fir tree,
    and instead of the brier shall come up the myrtle tree;
    and it shall be to the Lord for a memorial,
    for an everlasting sign
    that shall not be cut off.

    Isaiah 55
    [1] Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price.
    [2] Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight itself in fatness.
    [3] Incline your ear, and come unto me: hear, and your soul shall live; and
    I will make an everlasting covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David. [4] Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people.
    [5] Behold, thou shalt call a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee shall run unto thee because of the LORD thy God, and for the
    Holy One of Israel; for he hath glorified thee.
    [6] Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near: [7] Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts:
    and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to
    our God, for he will abundantly pardon.
    [8] For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,
    saith the LORD.
    [9] For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
    [10] For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth
    not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that
    it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:
    [11] So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not
    return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it
    shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.
    [12] For ye shall go out with joy, and be led forth with peace: the
    mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into singing, and all
    the trees of the field shall clap their hands.
    [13] Instead of the thorn shall come up the fir tree, and instead of the
    brier shall come up the myrtle tree: and it shall be to the LORD for a name, for an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off.

    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to Idlehands on Sun Mar 9 13:02:10 2025
    Idlehands wrote:

    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was
    after he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in
    God's image then how are women created?

    Where did this man god live before he created the Earth though?
    If we are created in his image and the Earth was created from a
    void, are we all the void?!!! ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Mon Mar 10 00:29:46 2025
    On 9/03/2025 11:07 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqk01c$n91g$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 10:27 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqjlbi$lck7$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
    <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 6:21 am, Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is
    a Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for
    sure? Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe
    Janesus transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's
    been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was
    after he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men!

    Of course! Men are THE only people who matter, aren't they??
    ;-P

    If we made in God's image then how are women created?

    Well, every production process has some mistakes/corruptions,
    don't they?? ;-P

    Does Isaiah 55 come to mind?

    Nope!! Not in the slightest!!

    WHAT??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Sun Mar 9 18:34:36 2025
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:

    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father
    God the Son, and
    God the Holy Ghost (he's been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was
    after he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in
    God's image then how are women created?


    Liar! You deny reality!
    2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a lair


    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is inspired by God and is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in righteousness,
    17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
    [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.


    Where did this man god live before he created the Earth though?
    If we are created in his image and the Earth was created from a
    void, are we all the void?!!! ;-)

    Explain your paradox!
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Sun Mar 9 18:36:34 2025
    In article <vqk53q$of87$2@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 11:07 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqk01c$n91g$2@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
    <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 10:27 pm, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqjlbi$lck7$1@dont-email.me>, Daniel70
    <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 9/03/2025 6:21 am, Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
    On 8/03/2025 1:31 am, Blueshirt wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:

    Oh!! Come on, Binky!! Theory11 was implying that God is
    a Woman (she)!! YOU can;t have that, can YOU, Binky??

    You mean, <gasp> god wasn't a woman? Do we know this for
    sure? Has anyone been able to prove it either way? Maybe
    Janesus transitioned? <shrugs> It happens!

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's
    been upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was
    after he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men!

    Of course! Men are THE only people who matter, aren't they??
    ;-P

    If we made in God's image then how are women created?

    Well, every production process has some mistakes/corruptions,
    don't they?? ;-P

    Does Isaiah 55 come to mind?

    Nope!! Not in the slightest!!

    WHAT??

    Again


    saiah 55
    The Invitation to the Waters
    1 (SS 5:1; Rev 21:6) Ho! Everyone who thirsts,
    come to the waters;
    and you who have no money,
    come, buy and eat.
    Come, buy wine and milk
    without money and without price.
    2 (Ps 22:26; Hos 8:7) Why do you spend money for that which is not bread,
    and your labor for that which does not satisfy?
    Listen diligently to Me, and eat what is good,
    and let your soul delight itself in abundance.
    3 (Isa 61:8; Ac 13:34) Incline your ear, and come to Me.
    Listen, so that your soul may live,
    and I will make an everlasting covenant with you,
    even the sure mercies of David.
    4 (Jer 30:9; Da 9:25) See, I have given him as a witness to the people,
    a leader and commander to the people.
    5 (Isa 60:9; Ge 49:10) Surely you shall call a nation that you do not know,
    and nations that did not know you shall run to you
    because of the Lord your God,
    even the Holy One of Israel;
    for He has glorified you.
    6 (Ps 32:6; Isa 45:19 ) Seek the Lord while He may be found,
    call you upon Him while He is near.
    7 (Isa 44:22; Pr 28:13) Let the wicked forsake his way,
    and the unrighteous man his thoughts;
    and let him return to the Lord, and He will have mercy upon him,
    and to our God, for He will abundantly pardon.
    8 For My thoughts are not your thoughts,
    nor are your ways My ways,
    says the Lord.
    9 (Ps 103:11) For as the heavens are higher than the earth,
    so are My ways higher than your ways,
    and My thoughts than your thoughts.
    10 (Isa 30:23) For as the rain comes down,
    and the snow from heaven,
    and do not return there
    but water the earth
    and make it bring forth and bud
    that it may give seed to the sower and bread to the eater,
    11 (Isa 45:23; 46:10) so shall My word be that goes forth from My mouth;
    it shall not return to Me void,
    but it shall accomplish that which I please,
    and it shall prosper in the thing for which I sent it.
    12 (Isa 44:23; Ps 105:43) For you shall go out with joy,
    and be led out with peace;
    the mountains and the hills
    shall break forth into singing before you,
    and all the trees of the field
    shall clap their hands.
    13 (Isa 41:19; 60:13) Instead of the thorn shall come up the fir tree,
    and instead of the brier shall come up the myrtle tree;
    and it shall be to the Lord for a memorial,
    for an everlasting sign
    that shall not be cut off.

    Isaiah 55
    [1] Ho, every one that thirsteth, come ye to the waters, and he that hath no money; come ye, buy, and eat; yea, come, buy wine and milk without money and without price.
    [2] Wherefore do ye spend money for that which is not bread? and your labour for that which satisfieth not? hearken diligently unto me, and eat ye that which is good, and let your soul delight itself in fatness.
    [3] Incline your ear, and come unto me: hear, and your soul shall live; and
    I will make an everlasting covenant with you, even the sure mercies of David. [4] Behold, I have given him for a witness to the people, a leader and commander to the people.
    [5] Behold, thou shalt call a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee shall run unto thee because of the LORD thy God, and for the
    Holy One of Israel; for he hath glorified thee.
    [6] Seek ye the LORD while he may be found, call ye upon him while he is near: [7] Let the wicked forsake his way, and the unrighteous man his thoughts:
    and let him return unto the LORD, and he will have mercy upon him; and to
    our God, for he will abundantly pardon.
    [8] For my thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways my ways,
    saith the LORD.
    [9] For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways, and my thoughts than your thoughts.
    [10] For as the rain cometh down, and the snow from heaven, and returneth
    not thither, but watereth the earth, and maketh it bring forth and bud, that
    it may give seed to the sower, and bread to the eater:
    [11] So shall my word be that goeth forth out of my mouth: it shall not
    return unto me void, but it shall accomplish that which I please, and it
    shall prosper in the thing whereto I sent it.
    [12] For ye shall go out with joy, and be led forth with peace: the
    mountains and the hills shall break forth before you into singing, and all
    the trees of the field shall clap their hands.
    [13] Instead of the thorn shall come up the fir tree, and instead of the
    brier shall come up the myrtle tree: and it shall be to the LORD for a name, for an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off.

    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Mon Mar 10 20:34:22 2025
    On 10/03/2025 5:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after
    he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in God's
    image then how are women created?

    Liar! You deny reality! 2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a
    lair

    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is *inspired* by God and is profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in
    righteousness, 17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be
    complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable
    for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
    righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
    furnished unto all good works.

    "inspired by God" does not mean WRITTEN BY GOD, Binky.

    Where did this man god live before he created the Earth though? If
    we are created in his image and the Earth was created from a void,
    are we all the void?!!! ;-)

    Explain your paradox!

    WHAT paradox, Binky?? If GOD is eternal and, somewhere along the line,
    GOD created The Earth, WHERE do GOD live before THAT, Binky??
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Mon Mar 10 14:39:24 2025
    In article <vqmbmg$19ckb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 5:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after
    he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in God's
    image then how are women created?

    Liar! You deny reality! 2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a
    lair

    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is *inspired* by God and is profitable for
    teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in
    righteousness, 17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be
    complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable
    for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
    righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
    furnished unto all good works.

    "inspired by God" does not mean WRITTEN BY GOD, Binky.
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted

    IF Inspired, how was it wirtten?


    Where did this man god live before he created the Earth though? If
    we are created in his image and the Earth was created from a void,
    are we all the void?!!! ;-)

    Explain your paradox!

    WHAT paradox, Binky?? If GOD is eternal and, somewhere along the line,
    GOD created The Earth, WHERE do GOD live before THAT, Binky??
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to solar.penguin@gmail.com on Mon Mar 10 14:40:22 2025
    In article <vqmofj$1c10j$1@dont-email.me>,
    solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:

    Daniel declared:

    On 10/03/2025 5:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after
    he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in God's
    image then how are women created?

    Liar! You deny reality! 2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a
    lair

    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is *inspired* by God and is profitable for
    teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in
    righteousness, 17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be
    complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable
    for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
    righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
    furnished unto all good works.

    "inspired by God" does not mean WRITTEN BY GOD, Binky.
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted


    It’s also a poor translation. AIUI it should say that scripture is
    written _as_ inspiration from God (i.e. written so that God may
    inspire the reader.)

    And of course, by ‘Scripture’ it only means the Old Testament since
    the New Testament obviously hadn’t been compiled back then,
    so wasn’t yet considered scripture.

    Ever seen a Lamp in the Dark by Chris Pinto, there Solar Penguin?


    --
    solar penguin


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Daniel70@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Tue Mar 11 22:40:58 2025
    On 11/03/2025 1:39 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqmbmg$19ckb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 5:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after
    he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in God's
    image then how are women created?

    Liar! You deny reality! 2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a
    lair

    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is *inspired* by God and is profitable for
    teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in
    righteousness, 17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be
    complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable
    for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
    righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
    furnished unto all good works.

    "inspired by God" does not mean WRITTEN BY GOD, Binky.
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted

    IF Inspired, how was it wirtten?

    By some HUMAN BEING holding some sort of writting implement, Binky!
    --
    Daniel70

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Idlehands@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 11 06:43:47 2025
    On 2025-03-11 5:40 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
    On 11/03/2025 1:39 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqmbmg$19ckb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70  <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 5:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after
    he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men!  If we made in God's
    image then how are women created?

    Liar! You deny reality! 2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a
    lair

    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is *inspired* by God and is profitable for
    teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in
    righteousness, 17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be
    complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable >>>> for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
    righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
    furnished unto all good works.

    "inspired by God" does not mean WRITTEN BY GOD, Binky.
                                                      ^^^^^<-Paedophile
    talker noted

    IF Inspired, how was it wirtten?

    By some HUMAN BEING holding some sort of writting implement, Binky!


    Interesting, seems like I am a "liar lair", not sure what to make of
    that but his little Scripture tidbit does not prove God is male.

    According to binky the author would require a "wirtten instrument". the
    best quote I read as "God did not fax the Bible to Earth".


    --
    "Re: For Binky (word used by paedohiles to indicate their pride in
    sexual molestation) ... Bible Studies"

    The Doctor (aka binky), March 2025

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to daniel47@eternal-september.org on Tue Mar 11 14:51:42 2025
    In article <vqp7gb$1uq22$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 11/03/2025 1:39 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqmbmg$19ckb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 5:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after
    he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in God's
    image then how are women created?

    Liar! You deny reality! 2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a
    lair

    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is *inspired* by God and is profitable for
    teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in
    righteousness, 17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be
    complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable >>>> for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
    righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
    furnished unto all good works.

    "inspired by God" does not mean WRITTEN BY GOD, Binky.
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile
    talker noted

    IF Inspired, how was it wirtten?

    By some HUMAN BEING holding some sort of writting implement, Binky!
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
    --
    Daniel70


    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to pursent100@gmail.com on Tue Mar 11 14:55:08 2025
    In article <lEOdnSZcn4RU1k36nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@giganews.com>,
    % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
    Daniel70 wrote:
    On 11/03/2025 1:39 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqmbmg$19ckb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70  <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 5:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been
    upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after >>>>>>>> he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men!  If we made in God's >>>>>>> image then how are women created?

    Liar! You deny reality! 2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a
    lair

    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is *inspired* by God and is profitable for >>>>> teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in
    righteousness, 17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be
    complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable >>>>> for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
    righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
    furnished unto all good works.

    "inspired by God" does not mean WRITTEN BY GOD, Binky.
                                                      ^^^^^<-Paedophile
    talker noted

    IF Inspired, how was it wirtten?

    By some HUMAN BEING holding some sort of writting implement, Binky!
    ^^^^^<-paedophile takler noted

    this will make idlehands say something stupid

    Good observation % !
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Doctor@21:1/5 to pursent100@gmail.com on Tue Mar 11 15:37:33 2025
    In article <joqcnT47jaFv0036nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>,
    % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqp7gb$1uq22$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 11/03/2025 1:39 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <vqmbmg$19ckb$1@dont-email.me>,
    Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
    On 10/03/2025 5:34 am, The Doctor wrote:
    In article <xn0p33io0gx06u0003@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
    <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    Idlehands wrote:
    On 2025-03-08 2:52 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:

    Haven't you read he Bible, Blueshirt??

    God the Father God the Son, and God the Holy Ghost (he's been >>>>>>>>> upgraded from Holy Ghost!!)

    So God was Male, as was Jesus. IF he transitioned, is was after >>>>>>>>> he Rose into Heaven!!

    The words above were written by.......Men! If we made in God's >>>>>>>> image then how are women created?

    Liar! You deny reality! 2 Timothy 3:16-17 calls you a fraud and a
    lair

    16 (Ro 15:4) All Scripture is *inspired* by God and is profitable for >>>>>> teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for instruction in
    righteousness, 17 (1Ti 6:11; 2Ti 2:21) that the man of God may be
    complete, thoroughly equipped for every good work.

    [16] All scripture is given by *inspiration* of God, and is profitable >>>>>> for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in
    righteousness: [17] That the man of God may be perfect, throughly
    furnished unto all good works.

    "inspired by God" does not mean WRITTEN BY GOD, Binky.
    ^^^^^<-Paedophile
    talker noted

    IF Inspired, how was it wirtten?

    By some HUMAN BEING holding some sort of writting implement, Binky!

    ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
    --
    Daniel70

    .

    a bic , why does daniel70 try to justify his sexual deviances

    Maybe he is under Idlehands' heavy influence.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    Declare the MAGA A terrorist movement like that of HAMAS!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)