The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
for you by AI?
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful
Performance Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me
Excited For Future Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the
opening episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe
that the episode is so bad that things can only get better?
How stupid are these idiots?
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's
performance, the same effeminate performance that drove all
the viewers away in his first season, where is highest rating
episode was the one he was barely in for a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful Performance >Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me Excited For Future
Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the opening
episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe that the episode
is so bad that things can only get better? How stupid are these idiots?
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance, the
same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away in his first >season, where is highest rating episode was the one he was barely in for
a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews, which
I will not read any further since I have a review of my own to do, so
that other people don't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
If "preachy subtext" equals "degenerate wokery" then, yes.
I will reserve my judgement until the weekend though.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
Well... 3 out of five is above average, it's equal to a 6/10
rating... that's not in the "crap" territory.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful
Performance Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me
Excited For Future Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the
opening episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe
that the episode is so bad that things can only get better?
How stupid are these idiots?
"Space Babies" was underwhelming as a season opener, I'd like to
think that "The Robot Revolution" will be a bit more engaging to
kick off the new season. A bad start to the new season and it
might be all downhill from there.
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's
performance, the same effeminate performance that drove all
the viewers away in his first season, where is highest rating
episode was the one he was barely in for a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Be positive!
In article <vt3m86$2mqjl$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written for you by AI? >>
REcall The Timeless Children review?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it
stands for." -William Shatner
In article <vt3m2a$2mqjl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful Performance
Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me Excited For Future
Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the opening
episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe that the episode
is so bad that things can only get better? How stupid are these idiots?
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance, the
same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away in his first
season, where is highest rating episode was the one he was barely in for
a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews, which
I will not read any further since I have a review of my own to do, so
that other people don't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Might highest could br 5/10 .
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
If "preachy subtext" equals "degenerate wokery" then, yes.
I will reserve my judgement until the weekend though.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
Well... 3 out of five is above average, it's equal to a 6/10
rating... that's not in the "crap" territory.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful
Performance Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me
Excited For Future Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the
opening episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe
that the episode is so bad that things can only get better?
How stupid are these idiots?
"Space Babies" was underwhelming as a season opener, I'd like to
think that "The Robot Revolution" will be a bit more engaging to
kick off the new season. A bad start to the new season and it
might be all downhill from there.
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's
performance, the same effeminate performance that drove all
the viewers away in his first season, where is highest rating
episode was the one he was barely in for a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Be positive!
In article <xn0p4bdb04m0p1q001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't
written for you by AI?
Agamemnon comes out swinging! Well said Aggy. <claps>
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
REcall the Timeless Children as a debacle!
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the sake of
other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that is that
other fans won't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the sake of
other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that is that
other fans won't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the sake of
other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that is that
other fans won't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt3m2a$2mqjl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful Performance >>> Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me Excited For Future
Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the opening
episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe that the episode
is so bad that things can only get better? How stupid are these idiots?
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance, the
same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away in his first >>> season, where is highest rating episode was the one he was barely in for >>> a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews, which
I will not read any further since I have a review of my own to do, so
that other people don't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Might highest could br 5/10 .
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I am not
looking forward to it.
On 4/9/2025 01:17, The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt3m2a$2mqjl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful Performance >>>> Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me Excited For Future
Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the opening
episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe that the episode >>>> is so bad that things can only get better? How stupid are these idiots? >>>>
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance, the
same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away in his
first
season, where is highest rating episode was the one he was barely in
for
a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews, which >>>> I will not read any further since I have a review of my own to do, so
that other people don't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Might highest could br 5/10 .
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I am not
looking forward to it.
Then you have already prejudiced your "review"...which are supposed to
be objective assessments. Might as well not do the review as it will
now be considered nothing more than confirmation bias.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
for you by AI?
Agamemnon comes out swinging! Well said Aggy. <claps>
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review. Let's
see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt3m86$2mqjl$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written for you by AI?
REcall The Timeless Children review?
So like 5 or 6 years ago?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >>>
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >>> stands for." -William Shatner
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt3m86$2mqjl$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written for you by AI?
REcall The Timeless Children review?
So like 5 or 6 years ago?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw >>>
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >>> stands for." -William Shatner
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt3m2a$2mqjl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful Performance >>> Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me Excited For Future
Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the opening
episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe that the episode
is so bad that things can only get better? How stupid are these idiots?
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance, the
same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away in his first >>> season, where is highest rating episode was the one he was barely in for >>> a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews, which
I will not read any further since I have a review of my own to do, so
that other people don't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Might highest could br 5/10 .
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I am not
looking forward to it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt3m86$2mqjl$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't
written for you by AI?
REcall The Timeless Children review?
"The Timeless Children" was from S12, so 2020... five years
ago!!!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the sake of
other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that is that
other fans won't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
On 09/04/2025 12:15, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the sake of
other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that is that
other fans won't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
And it's Easter time as well and Doctor Who fans are all being crucified
on the cross of wokery.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 4/9/2025 01:17, The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt3m2a$2mqjl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful Performance >>>> Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me Excited For Future
Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the opening
episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe that the episode >>>> is so bad that things can only get better? How stupid are these idiots? >>>>
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance, the
same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away in his first >>>> season, where is highest rating episode was the one he was barely in for >>>> a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews, which >>>> I will not read any further since I have a review of my own to do, so
that other people don't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Might highest could br 5/10 .
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I am not
looking forward to it.
Then you have already prejudiced your "review"...which are supposed to
be objective assessments. Might as well not do the review as it will
now be considered nothing more than confirmation bias.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 09/04/2025 12:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/9/2025 01:17, The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt3m2a$2mqjl$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
So the bigoted and degenerate wokery continues.
Rating given 3/5
In other word's it's crap.
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Here is what ScreenRant thinks.
"Doctor Who Season 15 Premiere Review: Ncuti Gatwa’s Joyful Performance >>>>> Elevates An Underwhelming Opener That Makes Me Excited For Future
Storylines"
https://screenrant.com/doctor-who-season-15-episode-1-review/
Say this again, the woke degenerate is Excited because the opening
episode is Underwhelming? Does the degenerate believe that the episode >>>>> is so bad that things can only get better? How stupid are these idiots? >>>>>
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance, the >>>>> same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away in his
first
season, where is highest rating episode was the one he was barely in >>>>> for
a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews, which >>>>> I will not read any further since I have a review of my own to do, so >>>>> that other people don't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Might highest could br 5/10 .
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I am not
looking forward to it.
Then you have already prejudiced your "review"...which are supposed to
be objective assessments. Might as well not do the review as it will
now be considered nothing more than confirmation bias.
I am allowed to predict a result before conducting an experiment
otherwise there would not be any point in conducting the experiment as
it would confirm nothing.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 4/9/2025 01:17, The True Loon wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I am not
looking forward to it.
Then you have already prejudiced your "review"...which are supposed to
be objective assessments. Might as well not do the review as it will
now be considered nothing more than confirmation bias.
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
The True Doctor wrote:To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be more
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
for you by AI?
Agamemnon comes out swinging! Well said Aggy. <claps>
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review. Let's
see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of Episodes .... back^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
pre-JodieDoctor I think.
--
Daniel70
On 09/04/2025 12:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/9/2025 01:17, The True Loon wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode "The
Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I am not
looking forward to it.
Then you have already prejudiced your "review"...which are supposed to
be objective assessments. Might as well not do the review as it will
now be considered nothing more than confirmation bias.
From the little I've seen, apart from AI, the episode's other social
commentary aspect is going to be about incels and toxic masculinity. So if Aggie ISN'T offended or doesn't feel attacked by it, it won't have done its job very well.
--
There’s no point in being grown up if you can’t act a little childish
sometimes.
On 4/9/2025 06:15, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the
sake of other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that
is that other fans won't have to watch this degenerate
woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
I admire martyrs....don't you?
In article <vt53ea$1fkj$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I
am not looking forward to it.
RTD/Disney just doubles down on the Timeless Child.
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't
written for you by AI?
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
On 09/04/2025 12:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/9/2025 01:17, The True Loon wrote:
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see.
I am not looking forward to it.
Then you have already prejudiced your "review"...which are
supposed to be objective assessments. Might as well not do
the review as it will now be considered nothing more than
confirmation bias.
From the little I've seen, apart from AI, the episode's other
social commentary aspect is going to be about incels and toxic
masculinity. So if Aggie ISN'T offended or doesn't feel
attacked by it, it won't have done its job very well.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt53ea$1fkj$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see. I
am not looking forward to it.
RTD/Disney just doubles down on the Timeless Child.
Stupid uninformed nonsense!
RTD as the showrunner for Doctor Who is responsible for the
scripts alright but Disney as a company do not give a shit about
the Timeless Child or the era of the show that it comes from.
The Timeless Child arc was before their distribution deal with
the BBC ... plus, Disney+ does not carry any of those episodes.
Your juvenile obsession is more related to a Disney cartoon than
it is the real world.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't
written for you by AI?
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks
about an episode!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks
about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s
something he doesn’t have much practice at.
--
solar penguin
The Last Doctor wrote:
On 09/04/2025 12:40, Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/9/2025 01:17, The True Loon wrote:
I can't imagine giving it anything above 1. We shall see.
I am not looking forward to it.
Then you have already prejudiced your "review"...which are
supposed to be objective assessments. Might as well not do
the review as it will now be considered nothing more than
confirmation bias.
From the little I've seen, apart from AI, the episode's other
social commentary aspect is going to be about incels and toxic
masculinity. So if Aggie ISN'T offended or doesn't feel
attacked by it, it won't have done its job very well.
Incels and... <gulp>... toxic masculinity?! I think I will need
to have my medication ready when I read Agamemnon's review of
THAT!!!
[Note to Aggy: Keep on saying the glass is half full, okay?
We'll get through this together... as the kind and caring
community that we are!]
On 4/9/2025 07:41, Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile taler noted
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be more
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
for you by AI?
Agamemnon comes out swinging! Well said Aggy. <claps>
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review. Let's
see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
^^^^^<-Paedophile taler notedaccurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of Episodes .... back
pre-JodieDoctor I think.
And if my memory serves, his summations were about how terrible the
episode was...only for him to then give it a 10/10 anyway. Of course,
that was long ago, and I could be in error.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be more
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
for you by AI?
Agamemnon comes out swinging! Well said Aggy. <claps>
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review. Let's
see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
In article <vt5pup$la5t$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
The True Doctor wrote:To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be more
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
for you by AI?
Agamemnon comes out swinging! Well said Aggy. <claps>
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review. Let's
see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of Episodes .... back^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Your memory is still there.
In article <vt52vj$1fkj$1@dont-email.me>, The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 22:35, The Doctor wrote:Twice?
In article <vt3m86$2mqjl$2@dont-email.me>, The True DoctorSo like 5 or 6 years ago?
<agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:REcall The Timeless Children review?
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>, Blueshirt
<blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
for you by AI?
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance,
the same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away
in his first season, where is highest rating episode was the one
he was barely in for a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews,
which I will not read any further since I have a review of my own
to do, so that other people don't have to watch this degenerate
woke garbage.
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the sake of other
Doctor Who fans.
The only positive from that is that other fans won't have to watch--
this degenerate woke garbage.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these
reviews, which I will not read any further since I have a
review of my own to do, so that other people don't have to
watch this degenerate woke garbage.
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the sake of
other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that is that
other fans won't have to watch this degenerate woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
On 9/04/2025 10:50 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
In article <vt5pup$la5t$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
The True Doctor wrote:To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be more
On 08/04/2025 15:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4b6c34cndhc000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Telegraph's review of the new season's opening episode
"The Robot Revolution"...
"Doctor Who, Season 2 review: a great intro for the new
companion, but with a preachy subtext"
Rating given 3/5
+ + POSSIBLE SPOILERS IN REVIEW + +
https://archive.ph/cpoGy
Sounds like me.
I will review So I will skip this article.
When was the last time you wrote a review that wasn't written
for you by AI?
Agamemnon comes out swinging! Well said Aggy. <claps>
You're quite correct, Dave never writes an actual review. Let's
see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of Episodes .... back^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Your memory is still there.
Make up YOUR mind, Binky.
I wrote that YOU, Binky, wrote YOUR reviews/summations about^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
pre-JodieDoctor episodes whereas YOU, Binky, posted elsewhere in this^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
thread that YOUR reviews/summations were DURING the Jodie/Doctor period!!
--
Daniel70
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 4/9/2025 06:15, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the
sake of other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that
is that other fans won't have to watch this degenerate
woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
I admire martyrs....don't you?
There's only one place for martyrs.
Get some planks of wood and some nails...
On 9/04/2025 4:16 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
And all she can think of that's positive is Gatwa's performance,
the same effeminate performance that drove all the viewers away
in his first season, where is highest rating episode was the one
he was barely in for a couple of minutes?
This series is well and truly dead by the sound of these reviews,
which I will not read any further since I have a review of my own
to do, so that other people don't have to watch this degenerate
woke garbage.
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the sake of other
Doctor Who fans.
How 'Self-sacrificing' of you, Aggy! ;-P
The only positive from that is that other fans won't have to watch--
this degenerate woke garbage.
Daniel70
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks
about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s
something he doesn’t have much practice at.
--
solar penguin
On 09/04/2025 22:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks
about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s
Why are you calling yourself a child molester?
something he doesn’t have much practice at.
--
solar penguin
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <vt8d7k$2v5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/04/2025 22:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks
about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s >>> ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Why are you calling yourself a child molester?
I am not
The word in question is used by paedophile to indicate their joy of child molestation.
In article <vt8cpe$2vkuq$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 10/04/2025 12:44 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Ah!! .... You had me going, there, Blueshirt. I was thinking you were
On 4/9/2025 06:15, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the
sake of other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that
is that other fans won't have to watch this degenerate
woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
I admire martyrs....don't you?
There's only one place for martyrs.
Get some planks of wood and some nails...
refering to that Episode where "Doctor Who" was set on a Pirate ship
.... and people were going to have to Walk The Plank .... but, no, you
swang in a Seasonal reference.
Well done. ;-P
Do read completely!
On 10/04/2025 10:30 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt8d7k$2v5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/04/2025 22:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks
about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s >>>> ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Why are you calling yourself a child molester?
I am not
The word in question is used by paedophile to indicate their joy of child
molestation.
HOW do YOU, Binky, know this 'fact', Binky??^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
On 10/04/2025 10:30 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt8d7k$2v5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/04/2025 22:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks
about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s >>>> ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Why are you calling yourself a child molester?
I am not
The word in question is used by paedophile to indicate their joy of child
molestation.
HOW do YOU, Binky, know this 'fact', Binky??
On 10/04/2025 10:21 pm, The Doctor wrote:vvvvv<-PAedophile talker noted
In article <vt8cpe$2vkuq$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 10/04/2025 12:44 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Ah!! .... You had me going, there, Blueshirt. I was thinking you were
On 4/9/2025 06:15, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 08/04/2025 19:59, Blueshirt wrote:
Be positive!
I am going to have to submit myself to torture for the
sake of other Doctor Who fans. The only positive from that
is that other fans won't have to watch this degenerate
woke garbage.
You are just what this world needs... a hero of the people.
You suffer for our sins of being Doctor Who fans!
I admire martyrs....don't you?
There's only one place for martyrs.
Get some planks of wood and some nails...
refering to that Episode where "Doctor Who" was set on a Pirate ship
.... and people were going to have to Walk The Plank .... but, no, you
swang in a Seasonal reference.
Well done. ;-P
Do read completely!
Why, Binky?? YOU, Binky, seemingly often fail to read posts completely,^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Binky.^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
On 4/10/2025 08:21, Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted >baby's pacifier.
On 10/04/2025 10:30 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt8d7k$2v5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/04/2025 22:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks >>>>>>> about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s >>>>> ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Why are you calling yourself a child molester?
I am not
The word in question is used by paedophile to indicate their joy of child >>> molestation.
HOW do YOU, Binky, know this 'fact', Binky??
He doesn't. Otherwise he would know that Binky is a BRAND NAME for a
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 4/10/2025 08:21, Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/04/2025 10:30 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt8d7k$2v5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/04/2025 22:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks >>>>>>> about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s >>>>> ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Why are you calling yourself a child molester?
I am not
The word in question is used by paedophile to indicate their joy of
child
molestation.
HOW do YOU, Binky, know this 'fact', Binky??
He doesn't. Otherwise he would know that Binky is a BRAND NAME for a
baby's pacifier.
On 10/04/2025 10:30 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt8d7k$2v5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/04/2025 22:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks
about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s >>>> ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Why are you calling yourself a child molester?
I am not
The word in question is used by paedophile to indicate their joy of child
molestation.
HOW do YOU, Binky, know this 'fact', Binky??
On 11/04/2025 7:43 am, Hornplayer9599 wrote:vvvvv<-PAedophile talker noted
On 4/10/2025 08:21, Daniel70 wrote:
On 10/04/2025 10:30 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt8d7k$2v5m4$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 09/04/2025 22:30, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vt6c9u$156mb$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/04/2025 5:01 am, Blueshirt wrote:
To be fair, Binky did use to write reviews ... well, to be
Dave never writes an actual review.
Let's see if he can manage one on Saturday evening...
more accurate, Binky wrote Point by Point summations of
Episodes .... back pre-JodieDoctor I think.
Point by point summaries of episodes would be better than AI
generated nonsense...
I don't know why Dave finds it so hard to tell us what HE thinks >>>>>>>> about an episode!
Binky would have to actually think for himself first, and that’s >>>>>> ^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
Why are you calling yourself a child molester?
I am not
The word in question is used by paedophile to indicate their joy of
child
molestation.
^^^^^<-PAedophile talker notedHOW do YOU, Binky, know this 'fact', Binky??
^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
He doesn't. Otherwise he would know that Binky is a BRAND NAME for a
^^^^^<-PAedophile talker notedbaby's pacifier.Good point, Hornplayer, but 'm sure that very point has been made TO
BINKY elsewhere in this thread ..... but, maybe, he was fixated on all
the 'Binky' in the post to actually absorb what was being stated in the^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
posts.
--
Daniel70
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 09:14:32 |
| Calls: | 10,388 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,843 |
| Posted today: | 1 |