On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:32:15 GMT, Blueshirt wrote:
I have avoided early access via the BBC iPlayer as I want to
try and do "Doctor Who" old school for this season... so
we'll sit down and watch the episode on BBC1 later today.
Good for you. I'll be doing that for most episodes this season
too. But I'm not gonna be free this evening, so I watched this
one in advance.
solar penguin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:32:15 GMT, Blueshirt wrote:
I have avoided early access via the BBC iPlayer as I want to
try and do "Doctor Who" old school for this season... so
we'll sit down and watch the episode on BBC1 later today.
Good for you. I'll be doing that for most episodes this season
too. But I'm not gonna be free this evening, so I watched this
one in advance.
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional way.
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of this
season the old school way if I can.
solar penguin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:32:15 GMT, Blueshirt wrote:
I have avoided early access via the BBC iPlayer as I want to
try and do "Doctor Who" old school for this season... so
we'll sit down and watch the episode on BBC1 later today.
Good for you. I'll be doing that for most episodes this season
too. But I'm not gonna be free this evening, so I watched this
one in advance.
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional way.
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of this
season the old school way if I can.
In article <xn0p4h1ouaeoz48001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:32:15 GMT, Blueshirt wrote:
I have avoided early access via the BBC iPlayer as I want to
try and do "Doctor Who" old school for this season... so
we'll sit down and watch the episode on BBC1 later today.
Good for you. I'll be doing that for most episodes this season
too. But I'm not gonna be free this evening, so I watched this
one in advance.
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional way.
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of this
season the old school way if I can.
Let the BBC find a new showrunner with a conscience!
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:32:15 GMT, Blueshirt wrote:
I have avoided early access via the BBC iPlayer as I want to
try and do "Doctor Who" old school for this season... so
we'll sit down and watch the episode on BBC1 later today.
Good for you. I'll be doing that for most episodes this season
too. But I'm not gonna be free this evening, so I watched this
one in advance.
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of this
season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and disgusting
woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually groom children to
grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to provide decent role models
for anyone to follow.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <vtenav$1b9h9$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:32:15 GMT, Blueshirt wrote:
I have avoided early access via the BBC iPlayer as I want to
try and do "Doctor Who" old school for this season... so
we'll sit down and watch the episode on BBC1 later today.
Good for you. I'll be doing that for most episodes this season
too. But I'm not gonna be free this evening, so I watched this
one in advance.
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of this
season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and disgusting
woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually groom children to
grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to provide decent role models
for anyone to follow.
Time for a change at the BBC!
On 13/04/2025 00:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vtenav$1b9h9$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2025 13:32:15 GMT, Blueshirt wrote:
I have avoided early access via the BBC iPlayer as I want to
try and do "Doctor Who" old school for this season... so
we'll sit down and watch the episode on BBC1 later today.
Good for you. I'll be doing that for most episodes this season
too. But I'm not gonna be free this evening, so I watched this
one in advance.
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of this
season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and disgusting
woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually groom children to
grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to provide decent role models
for anyone to follow.
Time for a change at the BBC!
They won't learn. The just erected a statue made by a degenerate child >molester at the headquarters to symbolism them and act as their
figurehead. These same disgusting woke degenerate perverts that support
the removal of statues of people connected with the slave trade but set
up statues created by child molesters. When Rolf Harris was convicted of >child molestation the national gallery or where ever it was being
displayed took down his painting of the Queen. Not so with the sick woke >perverts running the BBC. Everyone that's watched The Boys knows that
they woke are portrayed as paedophiles and depraved sex abusers and
rapists.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional
way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of
this season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and
disgusting woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually
groom children to grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to
provide decent role models for anyone to follow.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional
way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
You are still here talking about the show though, so clearly you
didn't get the memo!
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of
this season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and
disgusting woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually
groom children to grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to
provide decent role models for anyone to follow.
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show were
not sick and disgusting perverts? I doubt perverts and sexual
deviants in the entertainment industry only started happening
after 2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but I'm
sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
On 12/04/2025 21:34, The Doctor wrote:
Let the BBC find a new showrunner with a conscience!
They need to find one with a moral compass and not a sick disgusting
woke pervert with no decency that can't provide decent and moral role
models for people to follow.
On 13/04/2025 10:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and
disgusting woke pervert that wants to use the show to
sexually groom children to grow up in an abnormal manner
and refuses to provide decent role models for anyone to
follow.
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show
were not sick and disgusting perverts?
We know that one of the producers John Nathan-Turner was.
I doubt perverts and sexual deviants in the
entertainment industry only started happening after
2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but
I'm sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
Like I said above. Hire a pervert to run the show and they
will eventually destroy it.
On 13/04/2025 8:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:34, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Let the BBC find a new showrunner with a conscience!
They need to find one with a moral compass and not a sick
disgusting woke pervert with no decency that can't provide
decent and moral role models for people to follow.
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, with
Showrunner Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been MORE
PLEASED with the way RTD was presenting "Doctor Who" .... even
belittling DoctorChristopher when he left after just one
season.
Could it possibly be that Christopher found out what RTD was
really like way back then ..... and you two are just catching
up??
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional
way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
You are still here talking about the show though, so clearly you
didn't get the memo!
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of
this season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and
disgusting woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually
groom children to grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to
provide decent role models for anyone to follow.
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show were
not sick and disgusting perverts? I doubt perverts and sexual
deviants in the entertainment industry only started happening
after 2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but I'm
sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
On 13/04/2025 10:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional
way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
You are still here talking about the show though, so clearly you
didn't get the memo!
I was here talking about the show during the period it has been
cancelled between 1989 and 2005 (apart from the TVM in 1996).
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of
this season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and
disgusting woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually
groom children to grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to
provide decent role models for anyone to follow.
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show were
not sick and disgusting perverts? I doubt perverts and sexual
We know that one of the producers John Nathan-Turner was.
deviants in the entertainment industry only started happeningLike I said above. Hire a pervert to run the show and they will
after 2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but I'm
sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
eventually destroy it.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 13/04/2025 8:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:34, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, with ShowrunnerLet the BBC find a new showrunner with a conscience!
They need to find one with a moral compass and not a sick disgusting
woke pervert with no decency that can't provide decent and moral role
models for people to follow.
Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been MORE PLEASED with the way
RTD was presenting "Doctor Who" .... even belittling DoctorChristopher
when he left after just one season.
Could it possibly be that Christopher found out what RTD was really like
way back then ..... and you two are just catching up??
--
Daniel70
On 13/04/2025 8:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:34, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, with ShowrunnerLet the BBC find a new showrunner with a conscience!
They need to find one with a moral compass and not a sick disgusting
woke pervert with no decency that can't provide decent and moral role
models for people to follow.
Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been MORE PLEASED with the way
RTD was presenting "Doctor Who" .... even belittling DoctorChristopher
when he left after just one season.
Could it possibly be that Christopher found out what RTD was really like
way back then ..... and you two are just catching up??
In article <vtg2q5$2kjm4$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 13/04/2025 8:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:34, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, with ShowrunnerLet the BBC find a new showrunner with a conscience!
They need to find one with a moral compass and not a sick disgusting
woke pervert with no decency that can't provide decent and moral role
models for people to follow.
Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been MORE PLEASED with the way
RTD was presenting "Doctor Who" .... even belittling DoctorChristopher
when he left after just one season.
Could it possibly be that Christopher found out what RTD was really like
way back then ..... and you two are just catching up??
What about David Tennant as 10th and REAL 13th doctor?
--
Daniel70
In article <xn0p4i0l04658300e@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:03, Blueshirt wrote:
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show
were not sick and disgusting perverts?
We know that one of the producers John Nathan-Turner was.
Did you ever read the book about JNT by Richard Marson?
A definite eye-opener to some behind the scenes Doctor Who
shenanigans.
I recall Nicola Bryant describing sexism in DW at Visions 1993.
I might get that book.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and
disgusting woke pervert that wants to use the show to
sexually groom children to grow up in an abnormal manner
and refuses to provide decent role models for anyone to
follow.
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show
were not sick and disgusting perverts?
We know that one of the producers John Nathan-Turner was.
Did you ever read the book about JNT by Richard Marson?
A definite eye-opener to some behind the scenes Doctor Who
shenanigans.
I doubt perverts and sexual deviants in the
entertainment industry only started happening after
2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but
I'm sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
Like I said above. Hire a pervert to run the show and they
will eventually destroy it.
It's true I could do without a lot of the in-your-face type of
social commentary and messaging in Doctor Who these days but
overall I think RTD did a good job to get Doctor Who back on air
in 2005. He does deserve some credit for making the show BIG
back then. I just think he tries too hard to be 'right on' and
assume that's what the younger generation (under 30/35) want
from their TV viewing. He's an old man, start writing like an
older man and try to tell a good story first. Stop trying to be
a friend of every trendy agenda out there like you're hip! My
own children don't like watching Doctor Who now and they would
be the target demographic of the show, not me.
The biggest issue for me is with episodes that run to around 45
minutes the story itself needs to be the main focus, not the
message. But often it's the message that gets promoted andAll these woke predators care about and think about is the message.
details around the plot get overlooked, or are cut out for
timing.
Blueshirt blindsided Aggy:
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show were
not sick and disgusting perverts? I doubt perverts and sexual
deviants in the entertainment industry only started happening
after 2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but I'm
sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
Remember Aggy thinks all left-wingers are sick and disgusting perverts,
and one of the classic era writers was a literal card-carrying member
of the Communist Party. Let’s see him find perversion in The
War Games or Doctor Who And The Silurians...
Blueshirt blindsided Aggy:
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show were
not sick and disgusting perverts? I doubt perverts and sexual
deviants in the entertainment industry only started happening
after 2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but I'm
sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
Remember Aggy thinks all left-wingers are sick and disgusting perverts,
and one of the classic era writers was a literal card-carrying member
of the Communist Party. Let’s see him find perversion in The
War Games or Doctor Who And The Silurians...
--
solar penguin
On 13/04/2025 15:06, solar penguin wrote:
Blueshirt blindsided Aggy:
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show were
not sick and disgusting perverts? I doubt perverts and sexual
deviants in the entertainment industry only started happening
after 2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but I'm
sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
Remember Aggy thinks all left-wingers are sick and disgusting perverts,
and one of the classic era writers was a literal card-carrying member
of the Communist Party. Let’s see him find perversion in The
War Games or Doctor Who And The Silurians...
Back then there was editorial oversight which stopped the far left from
using the show to sexually groom children. Mary Whitehouse knew the BBC
was a den of sick, disgusting, perverts since the 1950s where her
underage daughter started to talk to her using sexually explicit
language which the said she learned from watching television.
Even back in 2005 there was more editorial oversight than there is now.
Now Davies is allowed to spread his disgusting sexual agenda directed at >children unimpeded by an organisation which venerates self admitted a
child molester and his sculptures. No wonder parents are not letting
their kids watch this show any more and the ratings are the lowest in >history.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 13/04/2025 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 8:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:34, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, with ShowrunnerLet the BBC find a new showrunner with a conscience!
They need to find one with a moral compass and not a sick
disgusting woke pervert with no decency that can't provide decent
and moral role models for people to follow.
Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been MORE PLEASED with the
way RTD was presenting "Doctor Who" .... even belittling
DoctorChristopher when he left after just one season.
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of that.
Remember Gridlock?
But at least back then he hadn't gone fully woke and didn't engage in
lazy writing. Chibnall on the other hand was a shit writer from the
start, and everyone knew it.
Could it possibly be that Christopher found out what RTD was really
like way back then ..... and you two are just catching up??
I never belittled Eccleston for quitting.
Eccleston found out that Davies was a self-centred, self-serving,--
egotistical bigot very early on. We had to wait over a decade for the
truth of Davies abuse and disrespect of the cast and crew to come
out.
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 13/04/2025 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 8:01 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:34, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, with ShowrunnerLet the BBC find a new showrunner with a conscience!
They need to find one with a moral compass and not a sick
disgusting woke pervert with no decency that can't provide decent
and moral role models for people to follow.
Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been MORE PLEASED with the
way RTD was presenting "Doctor Who" .... even belittling
DoctorChristopher when he left after just one season.
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with references to
homosexuality and bestiality on top of that.
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
Remember Gridlock?
Yes, I quite liked it .... dealing with Societies that are different to >ours!!
If I have been brought up on that (closed in) planet I would be first in
line to get outside .... or off the planet if needed!!
But at least back then he hadn't gone fully woke and didn't engage in
lazy writing. Chibnall on the other hand was a shit writer from the
start, and everyone knew it.
IF Chibnall WAS so bad how did he ever get the Series Boss job?? Surely
it wasn't up to the previous Series Boss to appoint their successor!
Could it possibly be that Christopher found out what RTD was really
like way back then ..... and you two are just catching up??
I never belittled Eccleston for quitting.
Ah! O.K., sorry, I must have been getting you confused with Binky!!
Eccleston found out that Davies was a self-centred, self-serving,--
egotistical bigot very early on. We had to wait over a decade for the
truth of Davies abuse and disrespect of the cast and crew to come
out.
Daniel70
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
But at least back then he hadn't gone fully woke and didn't
engage in lazy writing. Chibnall on the other hand was a
shit writer from the start, and everyone knew it.
IF Chibnall WAS so bad how did he ever get the Series Boss
job?? Surely it wasn't up to the previous Series Boss to
appoint their successor!
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/04/2025 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, with
Showrunner Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been
MORE PLEASED with the way RTD was presenting "Doctor Who"
.... even belittling DoctorChristopher when he left after
just one season.
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of that.
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
But at least back then he hadn't gone fully woke and didn't
engage in lazy writing. Chibnall on the other hand was a
shit writer from the start, and everyone knew it.
IF Chibnall WAS so bad how did he ever get the Series Boss
job?? Surely it wasn't up to the previous Series Boss to
appoint their successor!
"Broadchurch" probably.
Being a longtime Doctor Who fan helped too.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/04/2025 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, with
Showrunner Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been
MORE PLEASED with the way RTD was presenting "Doctor Who"
.... even belittling DoctorChristopher when he left after
just one season.
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of that.
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking notes
on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are the same
fans that end up with high blood pressure in their fifties and
sixties.
In article <xn0p4kvxt2czew0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
IF Chibnall WAS so bad how did he ever get the Series Boss
job?? Surely it wasn't up to the previous Series Boss to
appoint their successor!
"Broadchurch" probably.
Being a longtime Doctor Who fan helped too.
Chibnall is not DW Fan!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4kvxt2czew0001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
IF Chibnall WAS so bad how did he ever get the Series Boss
job?? Surely it wasn't up to the previous Series Boss to
appoint their successor!
"Broadchurch" probably.
Being a longtime Doctor Who fan helped too.
Chibnall is not DW Fan!
Bogus!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
On 13/04/2025 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, withNo I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
Showrunner Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been
MORE PLEASED with the way RTD was presenting "Doctor Who"
.... even belittling DoctorChristopher when he left after
just one season.
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of that.
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking notes
on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are the same
fans that end up with high blood pressure in their fifties and
sixties.
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
On 13/04/2025 11:14, Daniel70 wrote:Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
Seems to me that, during the early days of NewWho, withNo I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
Showrunner Russel T Davies, you guys couldn't have been
MORE PLEASED with the way RTD was presenting "Doctor Who"
.... even belittling DoctorChristopher when he left after
just one season.
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of that.
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking notes
on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are the same
fans that end up with high blood pressure in their fifties and
sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans. The problem is with the sick,
disgusting, showrunners that have no respect for the original IP and
want to use it to spread their depraved sexual agenda and attack,
insult, and demean the fans because they can't get laid.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show withReally!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of
that.
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking
notes on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are
the same fans that end up with high blood pressure in their
fifties and sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans.
The problem is with the sick, disgusting, showrunners that
have no respect for the original IP and want to use it to
spread their depraved sexual agenda and attack, insult, and
demean the fans because they can't get laid.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of
that.
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking
notes on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are
the same fans that end up with high blood pressure in their
fifties and sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans.
A lot of it is... a lot of them can't relax and enjoy a TV show
that they purport to like and some of them will be delighted
if/when "Doctor Who" gets cancelled. That to me is not a fan!
The problem is with the sick, disgusting, showrunners that
have no respect for the original IP and want to use it to
spread their depraved sexual agenda and attack, insult, and
demean the fans because they can't get laid.
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of
that.
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking
notes on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are
the same fans that end up with high blood pressure in their
fifties and sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans.
A lot of it is... a lot of them can't relax and enjoy a TV show
that they purport to like and some of them will be delighted
if/when "Doctor Who" gets cancelled. That to me is not a fan!
The problem is with the sick, disgusting, showrunners that
have no respect for the original IP and want to use it to
spread their depraved sexual agenda and attack, insult, and
demean the fans because they can't get laid.
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
On 19/04/2025 11:32 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of
that.
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking
notes on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are
the same fans that end up with high blood pressure in their
fifties and sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans.
A lot of it is... a lot of them can't relax and enjoy a TV show
that they purport to like and some of them will be delighted
if/when "Doctor Who" gets cancelled. That to me is not a fan!
Correct!
Correct!!The problem is with the sick, disgusting, showrunners that
have no respect for the original IP and want to use it to
spread their depraved sexual agenda and attack, insult, and
demean the fans because they can't get laid.
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
--
Daniel70
In article <vu09kt$1imc6$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 19/04/2025 11:32 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled toCorrect!!
that point of view.
Every saw the real 13th Doctor who looks like the 10th Doctor?
In article <xn0p4qkrr865tty000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
AGA withj for co-showrunners.
On 20/04/2025 12:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4qkrr865tty000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Gobble-de-gook!! AGAY ... co-showrunner!! That would be a neat trick ...That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
AGA withj for co-showrunners.
even for Aggy!!
--
Daniel70
On 20/04/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vu09kt$1imc6$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 19/04/2025 11:32 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled toCorrect!!
that point of view.
Ever saw the real 13th Doctor who looks like the 10th Doctor?
"Ever ..."?? "saw"??
The *14th* Doctor *IS* The *10th* (and/or *11th* ) Doctor!!
--
Daniel70
In article <vu2hqn$3jr5o$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 20/04/2025 12:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4qkrr865tty000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Gobble-de-gook!! AGAY ... co-showrunner!! That would be a neat trick ...That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
AGA withj for co-showrunners.
even for Aggy!!
With Solar Penguin.
In article <vu2hi0$3jkcf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 20/04/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vu09kt$1imc6$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 19/04/2025 11:32 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled toCorrect!!
that point of view.
Ever saw the real 13th Doctor who looks like the 10th Doctor?
"Ever ..."?? "saw"??
The *14th* Doctor *IS* The *10th* (and/or *11th* ) Doctor!!
What was the last episode of DW you ever saw live?
On 20/04/2025 9:58 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vu2hi0$3jkcf$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 20/04/2025 12:49 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vu09kt$1imc6$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 19/04/2025 11:32 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled toCorrect!!
that point of view.
Ever saw the real 13th Doctor who looks like the 10th Doctor?
"Ever ..."?? "saw"??
The *14th* Doctor *IS* The *10th* (and/or *11th* ) Doctor!!
What was the last episode of DW you ever saw live?
Apricots!!
--
Daniel70
On 20/04/2025 9:59 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-paedophile talker noted ^^^^^<-paedophile talker noted
In article <vu2hqn$3jr5o$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 20/04/2025 12:47 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4qkrr865tty000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
<Snip>
Gobble-de-gook!! AGAY ... co-showrunner!! That would be a neat trick ... >>> even for Aggy!!That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
AGA withj for co-showrunners.
With Solar Penguin.
So WHY didn't YOU, Binky, post that the first time around, Binky??
Ah!! Yes! The All Important Precious Post Count!!
--
Daniel70
The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of
that.
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking
notes on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are
the same fans that end up with high blood pressure in their
fifties and sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans.
A lot of it is... a lot of them can't relax and enjoy a TV show
that they purport to like and some of them will be delighted
if/when "Doctor Who" gets cancelled. That to me is not a fan!
That is why the majority of viewers are not watching this depravity andThe problem is with the sick, disgusting, showrunners that
have no respect for the original IP and want to use it to
spread their depraved sexual agenda and attack, insult, and
demean the fans because they can't get laid.
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
In article <vtfv65$2fem9$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional
way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
You are still here talking about the show though, so clearly you
didn't get the memo!
I was here talking about the show during the period it has been
cancelled between 1989 and 2005 (apart from the TVM in 1996).
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of
this season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and
disgusting woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually
groom children to grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to
provide decent role models for anyone to follow.
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show were
not sick and disgusting perverts? I doubt perverts and sexual
We know that one of the producers John Nathan-Turner was.
deviants in the entertainment industry only started happeningLike I said above. Hire a pervert to run the show and they will
after 2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but I'm
sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
eventually destroy it.
Would the Fox/BBC alliance had worked out?
On 19/04/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of
that.
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking
notes on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are
the same fans that end up with high blood pressure in their
fifties and sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans.
A lot of it is... a lot of them can't relax and enjoy a TV show
that they purport to like and some of them will be delighted
if/when "Doctor Who" gets cancelled. That to me is not a fan!
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering from an >incurable disease then the best thing you can do for it is to alleviate
it's suffering by putting it down.
That is why the majority of viewers are not watching this depravity andThe problem is with the sick, disgusting, showrunners that
have no respect for the original IP and want to use it to
spread their depraved sexual agenda and attack, insult, and
demean the fans because they can't get laid.
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to
that point of view.
are not letting their children watch it either.
1.58 million so-called viewers means no one is actually watching. It's
either people who have their TV switched on all day on BBC1 or people
hate watching so that others don't have to.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 13/04/2025 13:15, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vtfv65$2fem9$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:03, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 12/04/2025 21:23, Blueshirt wrote:
If, as the rumours suggest, this is to be the last season of
Doctor Who for a while I'd like to enjoy it the traditional
way.
There's been no Doctor Who since 2017.
You are still here talking about the show though, so clearly you
didn't get the memo!
I was here talking about the show during the period it has been
cancelled between 1989 and 2005 (apart from the TVM in 1996).
Obviously if it turns out that I am going to be busy on a
Saturday evening I'll use the iPlayer/Disney+ to watch an
episode during the day... but I'd like to watch as much of
this season the old school way if I can.
The old skool was was when it was not written by a sick and
disgusting woke pervert that wants to use the show to sexually
groom children to grow up in an abnormal manner and refuses to
provide decent role models for anyone to follow.
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show were
not sick and disgusting perverts? I doubt perverts and sexual
We know that one of the producers John Nathan-Turner was.
deviants in the entertainment industry only started happeningLike I said above. Hire a pervert to run the show and they will
after 2005! The light might shine brighter on them now but I'm
sure they were around in the BBC back then too.
eventually destroy it.
Would the Fox/BBC alliance had worked out?
The BBC should have made it conditional that they would only have the
rights if they made a full series of at least 13 45 minutes episodes
every 18 months starting with a full season broadcast in 1996.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 19/04/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of that.
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too
much into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't
just sit and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking notes
on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are the same
fans that end up with high blood pressure in their fifties and
sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans.
A lot of it is... a lot of them can't relax and enjoy a TV show
that they purport to like and some of them will be delighted
if/when "Doctor Who" gets cancelled. That to me is not a fan!
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering from an incurable disease then the best thing you can do for it is to
alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
That is why the majority of viewers are not watching this depravityThe problem is with the sick, disgusting, showrunners that have
no respect for the original IP and want to use it to spread their
depraved sexual agenda and attack, insult, and demean the fans
because they can't get laid.
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to that
point of view.
and are not letting their children watch it either.
1.58 million so-called viewers means no one is actually watching.
It's either people who have their TV switched on all day on BBC1 or--
people hate watching so that others don't have to.
On 23/04/2025 5:10 am, The True Doctor wrote:
1.58 million so-called viewers means no one is actually
watching.
New-New-Maths .... where 1.58 million equals ZERO !!
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering
from an incurable disease then the best thing you can do for
it is to alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering
from an incurable disease then the best thing you can do for
it is to alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
In article <xn0p4w4jf3r2k7c003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering
from an incurable disease then the best thing you can do for
it is to alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
Too bad the management almost killed the BBC in the process.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4w4jf3r2k7c003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering
from an incurable disease then the best thing you can do for
it is to alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
Too bad the management almost killed the BBC in the process.
At a guess I'd say the BBC are in a worse state now than they
were back then...
The BBC bosses didn't like "Doctor Who" back in the 1990's and
preferred to spend its budget producing other shows... now they
are struggling to find money for "Doctor Who" and have to go
begging cap in hand to big media companies like Disney.
In article <xn0p4w8eg3w88t6000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Too bad the management almost killed the BBC in the process.
At a guess I'd say the BBC are in a worse state now than they
were back then...
The BBC bosses didn't like "Doctor Who" back in the 1990's
and preferred to spend its budget producing other shows...
now they are struggling to find money for "Doctor Who" and
have to go begging cap in hand to big media companies like
Disney.
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
At a guess I'd say the BBC are in a worse state now than they
were back then...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4w8eg3w88t6000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Too bad the management almost killed the BBC in the process.
At a guess I'd say the BBC are in a worse state now than they
were back then...
The BBC bosses didn't like "Doctor Who" back in the 1990's
and preferred to spend its budget producing other shows...
now they are struggling to find money for "Doctor Who" and
have to go begging cap in hand to big media companies like
Disney.
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of Power"
or "The Wheel of Time"?
Blueshirt wrote:
At a guess I'd say the BBC are in a worse state now than they
were back then...
Looks like they can't even afford to make "Casualty"!
https://www.bbc.com/mediacentre/2025/casualty-competitive-tender
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering
from an incurable disease then the best thing you can do for
it is to alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
On 23/04/2025 5:10 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 19/04/2025 14:32, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/04/2025 12:57, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:21 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Really!! Can't say I ever read THAT much into the shows!!
No I wasn't. Even then Davies was filling the show with
references to homosexuality and bestiality on top of that.
THAT is the main problem with some fans... they read way too much
into every scene and every line of dialogue. They can't just sit
and enjoy an episode of a TV show without taking notes
on it so they can have a rant later. I bet these are the same
fans that end up with high blood pressure in their fifties and
sixties.
The problem isn't with the fans.
A lot of it is... a lot of them can't relax and enjoy a TV show that
they purport to like and some of them will be delighted if/when
"Doctor Who" gets cancelled. That to me is not a fan!
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering from an
incurable disease then the best thing you can do for it is to
alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
Has anyone noticed that Aggy is obviously suffering from an incurable
Disease (Lack of Old-style "Doctor Who")
Could someone please take pity on Him and alleviate his suffering by
putting him down??
That is why the majority of viewers are not watching this depravityThe problem is with the sick, disgusting, showrunners that have
no respect for the original IP and want to use it to spread their
depraved sexual agenda and attack, insult, and demean the fans
because they can't get laid.
That is your unique 'take' on the show and you are entitled to that
point of view.
and are not letting their children watch it either.
"the majority of viewers are not watching". I thought NO-ONE was watching!!
1.58 million so-called viewers means no one is actually watching.
New-New-Maths .... where 1.58 million equals *ZERO* !!
It's either people who have their TV switched on all day on BBC1 or
people hate watching so that others don't have to.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4w8eg3w88t6000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Too bad the management almost killed the BBC in the process.
At a guess I'd say the BBC are in a worse state now than they
were back then...
The BBC bosses didn't like "Doctor Who" back in the 1990's
and preferred to spend its budget producing other shows...
now they are struggling to find money for "Doctor Who" and
have to go begging cap in hand to big media companies like
Disney.
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of Power"
or "The Wheel of Time"?
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4w8eg3w88t6000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Too bad the management almost killed the BBC in the process.
At a guess I'd say the BBC are in a worse state now than they
were back then...
The BBC bosses didn't like "Doctor Who" back in the 1990's
and preferred to spend its budget producing other shows...
now they are struggling to find money for "Doctor Who" and
have to go begging cap in hand to big media companies like
Disney.
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of Power"
or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The Wheel of
Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the worst of the lot. Now >they're set to totally destroy James Bond.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 23/04/2025 12:55, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering
from an incurable disease then the best thing you can do for
it is to alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
Back then fans did not want Doctor Who to be cancelled.
Doctor Who has been dead since 2017. That's longer than between 1989 and
the TV in 1996, and there was even Dimensions in Time and some Jon
Pertwee radio stories in between. Today there is nothing.
Fans want cancellation and they don't want Doctor Who to ever return
unless the Timeless Child monster is removed from canon. Even with that >Russell T Davies hammered a steak through the Doctor's heart by making
him gay and no parent will allow their child to watch this show ever
again unless everything from 2017 onwards is totally erased and never >mentioned ever again as being part of Doctor Who. Degenerate fan fiction
and attempts to sexually groom children have no place in Doctor Who.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
On 23/04/2025 12:55, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is
suffering from an incurable disease then the best thing
you can do for it is to alleviate it's suffering by
putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
Back then fans did not want Doctor Who to be cancelled.
Doctor Who has been dead since 2017. That's longer than
between 1989 and the TV in 1996, and there was even Dimensions
in Time and some Jon Pertwee radio stories in between. Today
there is nothing.
Fans want cancellation and they don't want Doctor Who to ever
return unless the Timeless Child monster is removed from
canon.
In article <xn0p4wdb142wb7w000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
Not yet.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to watch
them again... I have no desire to see those shows cancelled.
They are not for me so I find other shows to watch.
This is the way...
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 12:55, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is
suffering from an incurable disease then the best thing
you can do for it is to alleviate it's suffering by
putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
Back then fans did not want Doctor Who to be cancelled.
No fans want to see a show they claim to be a fan of
cancelled... or they wouldn't be a fan. They'd just be neutral
watchers of a television show. Calling these people 'Doctor Who
fans' is an oxymoron.
Doctor Who has been dead since 2017. That's longer than
between 1989 and the TV in 1996, and there was even Dimensions
in Time and some Jon Pertwee radio stories in between. Today
there is nothing.
You have "The War Between the Land and the Sea" coming later
this year... so "nothing" is not correct.
Plus, Big Finish Productions will keep the "Doctor Who" flame
burning if the BBC do cancel the show.
Fans want cancellation and they don't want Doctor Who to ever
return unless the Timeless Child monster is removed from
canon.
No, it's the woke so-called fans that want the show cancelled
because they don't like "Doctor Who" now... it's not made for
them and their pet likes/dislikes, or as it was made in 1975
when Tom Baker was the Doctor... so why should anyone else dare
to like Doctor Who when they don't? Just the like the woke
brigade in life who want everything they dislike cancelled.
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled on
YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content creators
using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money from their
content.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4wdb142wb7w000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
Not yet.
Go watch them then before you start piping up about Amazon
taking on "Doctor Who"... of course, to watch those shows you'd
probably have to pay money to Amazon and we all know that Bats
fly out of your wallet on those rare occasions that you do open
it.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to watch
them again... I have no desire to see those shows cancelled.
They are not for me so I find other shows to watch.
This is the way...
In article <xn0p4xhja54dnqo003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to watch
them again... I have no desire to see those shows cancelled.
They are not for me so I find other shows to watch.
This is the way...
Then maybe do not watch.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4i0l04658300e@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 13/04/2025 10:03, Blueshirt wrote:
How do we know the writers in the classic era of the show
were not sick and disgusting perverts?
We know that one of the producers John Nathan-Turner was.
Did you ever read the book about JNT by Richard Marson?
A definite eye-opener to some behind the scenes Doctor Who
shenanigans.
I recall Nicola Bryant describing sexism in DW at Visions 1993.
There was a lot worse then THAT going on.
Allegedly!
I might get that book.
I'd recommend it to every fan of the classic era. It's an eye
opener!
I will add that it was published after JNT had died so he wasn't
around to answer any of its claims or put across his version of
events described. However, nobody else sued the author either.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 12:55, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is
suffering from an incurable disease then the best thing
you can do for it is to alleviate it's suffering by
putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
Back then fans did not want Doctor Who to be cancelled.
No fans want to see a show they claim to be a fan of
cancelled... or they wouldn't be a fan. They'd just be neutral
watchers of a television show. Calling these people 'Doctor Who
fans' is an oxymoron.
Doctor Who has been dead since 2017. That's longer than
between 1989 and the TV in 1996, and there was even Dimensions
in Time and some Jon Pertwee radio stories in between. Today
there is nothing.
You have "The War Between the Land and the Sea" coming later
this year... so "nothing" is not correct.
Plus, Big Finish Productions will keep the "Doctor Who" flame
burning if the BBC do cancel the show.
Fans want cancellation and they don't want Doctor Who to ever
return unless the Timeless Child monster is removed from
canon.
No, it's the woke so-called fans that want the show cancelled
because they don't like "Doctor Who" now... it's not made for
them and their pet likes/dislikes, or as it was made in 1975
when Tom Baker was the Doctor... so why should anyone else dare
to like Doctor Who when they don't? Just the like the woke
brigade in life who want everything they dislike cancelled.
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled on
YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content creators
using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money from theirThey are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the entire nation.
content.
On 24/04/2025 11:56, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that
will retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to
watch them again... I have no desire to see those shows
cancelled. They are not for me so I find other shows to
watch.
This is the way...
These shows should never have been made unless they were 100%
faithful to the work, messages, thoughts and ideas of the
original authors.
They are a total insult to the source material which was
systematically defiled and to the original authors themselves
whose names and IPs have been used to sell degenerate woke
garbage and sexually groom children by sick, depraved, woke
perverts.
This is why people are speaking out against them. If they were
just crap then people wouldn't watch. But they're more than
just crap.
They're there to attack and insult men and
masculinity, pervert children by pandering to pederasts, and
make the audience submissive and compliant to abusive tyranny.
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled
on YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content
creators using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money
from their videos.
They are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the
entire nation.
In article <xn0p4xhzn54w7hq005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4wdb142wb7w000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
Not yet.
Go watch them then before you start piping up about Amazon
taking on "Doctor Who"... of course, to watch those shows
you'd probably have to pay money to Amazon and we all know
that Bats fly out of your wallet on those rare occasions
that you do open it.
Sudenly you and AGA are causing me to say no!
In article <xn0p4xhai540yo9002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Fans want cancellation and they don't want Doctor Who to
ever return unless the Timeless Child monster is removed
from canon.
No, it's the woke so-called fans that want the show cancelled
because they don't like "Doctor Who" now... it's not made for
them and their pet likes/dislikes, or as it was made in 1975
when Tom Baker was the Doctor... so why should anyone else
dare to like Doctor Who when they don't? Just the like the
woke brigade in life who want everything they dislike
cancelled.
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled
on YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content
creators using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money
from their content.
Name them!
The True Doctor wrote:
How do you make others not watch this vile, degenerate, woke
propaganda that seeks to sexually groom children and impede
the progress of men and meritocracy?
This woke filth has to be systematically condemned at every
opportunity until no one wants to watch it and it stops being
made.
The disgusting perverts that made it have to be driven out of
film, television, theatre, and the entertainment industry.
How do you drive those types of people out of the entertainment
industry though? Sure, you can complain about them here to
twenty people, in a blog/Facebook post or YouTube video, but how
do you change a whole industry? Take a look at people walking in
the street outside your house, do you think any of them care
enough?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled
on YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content
creators using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money
from their videos.
They are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the
entire nation.
I don't think so.
I am not in the UK but from what I see there doesn't seem to be
too many people protesting on the streets over there about the
woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of the nation
couldn't give a shit. TV shows wouldn't be top of people's everyWait for the local election results.
day agenda. The majority of them have to go to work and live
their life... if they don't like a TV show I'm sure they just
switch over or go and do something else instead.
Of course, there will always be Angry of Tunbridge Wells who
sends an e-mail to the BBC and OFCOM, but I wouldn't think those
types constitute the mood of the entire nation.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 11:56, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that
will retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to
watch them again... I have no desire to see those shows
cancelled. They are not for me so I find other shows to
watch.
This is the way...
These shows should never have been made unless they were 100%
faithful to the work, messages, thoughts and ideas of the
original authors.
They are a total insult to the source material which was
systematically defiled and to the original authors themselves
whose names and IPs have been used to sell degenerate woke
garbage and sexually groom children by sick, depraved, woke
perverts.
This is why people are speaking out against them. If they were
just crap then people wouldn't watch. But they're more than
just crap.
Well... I think I am happy enough to go with "crap" in the case
of "Rings of Power"... and dull/boring in the case of "Wheel of
Time".
However, Mrs Blueshirt did watch both of those shows and quite
likes "The Wheel of Time" so I am happy enough to just not watch
it... as opposed to spoiling her enjoyment by hoping to see the
show cancelled.
We have to get value for money out of our Prime subscription...
so she watches stuff so that I don't have to!
If you carry on letting her watch this perverted woke garbage she'llThey're there to attack and insult men and
masculinity, pervert children by pandering to pederasts, and
make the audience submissive and compliant to abusive tyranny.
Hmmm... maybe that's why Mrs Blueshirt likes those sort of
fantasy shows?
On 24/04/2025 13:10, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xhja54dnqo003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to watch
them again... I have no desire to see those shows cancelled.
They are not for me so I find other shows to watch.
This is the way...
Then maybe do not watch.
How do you make others not watch this vile, degenerate, woke propaganda
that seeks to sexually groom children and impede the progress of men and >meritocracy?
This woke filth has to be systematically condemned at every opportunity
until no one wants to watch it and it stops being made.
The disgusting perverts that made it have to be driven out of film, >television, theatre, and the entertainment industry.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 11:56, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that
will retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to
watch them again... I have no desire to see those shows
cancelled. They are not for me so I find other shows to
watch.
This is the way...
These shows should never have been made unless they were 100%
faithful to the work, messages, thoughts and ideas of the
original authors.
They are a total insult to the source material which was
systematically defiled and to the original authors themselves
whose names and IPs have been used to sell degenerate woke
garbage and sexually groom children by sick, depraved, woke
perverts.
This is why people are speaking out against them. If they were
just crap then people wouldn't watch. But they're more than
just crap.
Well... I think I am happy enough to go with "crap" in the case
of "Rings of Power"... and dull/boring in the case of "Wheel of
Time".
However, Mrs Blueshirt did watch both of those shows and quite
likes "The Wheel of Time" so I am happy enough to just not watch
it... as opposed to spoiling her enjoyment by hoping to see the
show cancelled.
We have to get value for money out of our Prime subscription...
so she watches stuff so that I don't have to!
They're there to attack and insult men and
masculinity, pervert children by pandering to pederasts, and
make the audience submissive and compliant to abusive tyranny.
Hmmm... maybe that's why Mrs Blueshirt likes those sort of
fantasy shows?
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 12:55, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is
suffering from an incurable disease then the best thing
you can do for it is to alleviate it's suffering by
putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
Back then fans did not want Doctor Who to be cancelled.
No fans want to see a show they claim to be a fan of
cancelled... or they wouldn't be a fan. They'd just be neutral
watchers of a television show. Calling these people 'Doctor Who
fans' is an oxymoron.
Doctor Who has been dead since 2017. That's longer than
between 1989 and the TV in 1996, and there was even Dimensions
in Time and some Jon Pertwee radio stories in between. Today
there is nothing.
You have "The War Between the Land and the Sea" coming later
this year... so "nothing" is not correct.
Plus, Big Finish Productions will keep the "Doctor Who" flame
burning if the BBC do cancel the show.
Fans want cancellation and they don't want Doctor Who to ever
return unless the Timeless Child monster is removed from
canon.
No, it's the woke so-called fans that want the show cancelled
because they don't like "Doctor Who" now... it's not made for
Yes they do. When a show becomes unrecognisable and is being used to
spread hate against the fans, degenerate far left sexist and racist >propaganda, and to sexually groom children, then cancellation is the
only option.
them and their pet likes/dislikes, or as it was made in 1975
when Tom Baker was the Doctor... so why should anyone else dare
to like Doctor Who when they don't? Just the like the woke
brigade in life who want everything they dislike cancelled.
No one is watching this show. It's being used by a bunch of sick and >disgusting child grooming perverts to spread their own personal immoral >agendas.
Ratings of 1.58 million overnight mean NOBODY is watching this show.
This is basically the number of people who always have their TV tuned in
to BBC1 all day and never change channel while they are doing something
else.
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled on
YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content creators
Why would they be fans of Ncuti Gatwa or anything he stars in when he's
an effeminate, mentally ill, cross dressing pervert? Why would the be
fans of a show written by perverts who want to sexually groom children
to be like them?
using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money from theirThey are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the entire nation. >The woke are a bunch of elitist bigots that think the whole world
content.
revolves around them and their disgusting perverted way of life, and
don't reflect society in general whatsoever. The main aim of Hollywood
has always been to legalise sex with children because the whole place is
full of pederasts.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xhzn54w7hq005@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4wdb142wb7w000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
Not yet.
Go watch them then before you start piping up about Amazon
taking on "Doctor Who"... of course, to watch those shows
you'd probably have to pay money to Amazon and we all know
that Bats fly out of your wallet on those rare occasions
that you do open it.
Sudenly you and AGA are causing me to say no!
More like the thought of actually spending money on Amazon Prime!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled
on YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content
creators using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money
from their videos.
They are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the
entire nation.
I don't think so.
I am not in the UK but from what I see there doesn't seem to be
too many people protesting on the streets over there about the
woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of the nation
couldn't give a shit. TV shows wouldn't be top of people's every
day agenda. The majority of them have to go to work and live
their life... if they don't like a TV show I'm sure they just
switch over or go and do something else instead.
Of course, there will always be Angry of Tunbridge Wells who
sends an e-mail to the BBC and OFCOM, but I wouldn't think those
types constitute the mood of the entire nation.
On 24/04/2025 20:04, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled
on YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content
creators using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money
from their videos.
They are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the
entire nation.
I don't think so.
Then you are wrong.
I am not in the UK but from what I see there doesn't seem to be
In which case you are not in a position to comment.
too many people protesting on the streets over there about the
woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of the nation
They don't need to protest in the streets. It's all over the newspapers.
The people of Britain have had enough of wokery and that's why most of
them now support Nigel Farage and Reform.
couldn't give a shit. TV shows wouldn't be top of people's everyWait for the local election results.
day agenda. The majority of them have to go to work and live
their life... if they don't like a TV show I'm sure they just
switch over or go and do something else instead.
Of course, there will always be Angry of Tunbridge Wells who
sends an e-mail to the BBC and OFCOM, but I wouldn't think those
types constitute the mood of the entire nation.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 24/04/2025 19:55, Blueshirt wrote:
Well... I think I am happy enough to go with "crap" in the
case of "Rings of Power"... and dull/boring in the case of
"Wheel of Time".
However, Mrs Blueshirt did watch both of those shows and
quite likes "The Wheel of Time" so I am happy enough to just
not watch it... as opposed to spoiling her enjoyment by
hoping to see the show cancelled.
We have to get value for money out of our Prime
subscription... so she watches stuff so that I don't have
to!
She might as well have not bothered with Season 3 of The Wheel
of Woke as nothing happened that was of any consequence that
wasn't done in the final episode, and most of it wasn't even
in the books as you can figure out by watching the
accompanying making-of documentaries.
They're there to attack and insult men and
masculinity, pervert children by pandering to pederasts,
and make the audience submissive and compliant to abusive
tyranny.
Hmmm... maybe that's why Mrs Blueshirt likes those sort of
fantasy shows?
If you carry on letting her watch this perverted woke garbage
she'll turn on you.
Get her to watch Reacher instead.
In article <vudqjq$1ufdb$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
The woke are a bunch of elitist bigots that think the
whole world revolves around them and their disgusting
perverted way of life, and don't reflect society in
general whatsoever. The main aim of Hollywood has always
been to legalise sex with children because the whole place
is full of pederasts.
Talk about contentless content.
In article <xn0p4xu5u5li62s001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The disgusting perverts that made it have to be driven out
of film, television, theatre, and the entertainment
industry.
How do you drive those types of people out of the
entertainment industry though? Sure, you can complain about
them here to twenty people, in a blog/Facebook post or
YouTube video, but how do you change a whole industry? Take
a look at people walking in the street outside your house,
do you think any of them care enough?
Protest en masse?
In article <vue6sh$2aosd$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 24/04/2025 20:04, Blueshirt wrote:
... but from what I see there doesn't seem to be too
many people protesting on the streets over there about
the woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of
the nation couldn't give a shit.
They don't need to protest in the streets. It's all over the
newspapers. The people of Britain have had enough of wokery
and that's why most of them now support Nigel Farage and
Reform.
Wait for the local election results.
I hope REform goes nowhere.
On 24/04/2025 13:10, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xhja54dnqo003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to watch
them again... I have no desire to see those shows cancelled.
They are not for me so I find other shows to watch.
This is the way...
Then maybe do not watch.
How do you make others not watch this vile, degenerate, woke propaganda
that seeks to sexually groom children and impede the progress of men and meritocracy?
This woke filth has to be systematically condemned at every opportunity
until no one wants to watch it and it stops being made.
The disgusting perverts that made it have to be driven out of film, television, theatre, and the entertainment industry.
We watched "Reacher" together (all three seasons) and really
enjoyed it. It's probably our favourite series on Amazon Prime.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4wdb142wb7w000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
Not yet.
Go watch them then before you start piping up about Amazon
taking on "Doctor Who"... of course, to watch those shows you'd
probably have to pay money to Amazon and we all know that Bats
fly out of your wallet on those rare occasions that you do open
it.
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 12:55, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
If you have a sick animal which you love and it is suffering
from an incurable disease then the best thing you can do for
it is to alleviate it's suffering by putting it down.
That's exactly why Doctor Who was cancelled in 1989. But that
doesn't mean fans should be happy to see the show they love
cancelled or put on a long hiatus...
Back then fans did not want Doctor Who to be cancelled.
No fans want to see a show they claim to be a fan of cancelled...
or they wouldn't be a fan. They'd just be neutral watchers of a
television show. Calling these people 'Doctor Who fans' is an
oxymoron.
Doctor Who has been dead since 2017. That's longer than between
1989 and the TV in 1996, and there was even Dimensions in Time
and some Jon Pertwee radio stories in between. Today there is
nothing.
You have "The War Between the Land and the Sea" coming later this
year... so "nothing" is not correct.
Plus, Big Finish Productions will keep the "Doctor Who" flame
burning if the BBC do cancel the show.
Fans want cancellation and they don't want Doctor Who to ever
return unless the Timeless Child monster is removed from canon.
No, it's the woke so-called fans that want the show cancelled
because they don't like "Doctor Who" now... it's not made for
Yes they do. When a show becomes unrecognisable and is being used to
spread hate against the fans, degenerate far left sexist and racist propaganda, and to sexually groom children, then cancellation is the
only option.
them and their pet likes/dislikes, or as it was made in 1975 when
Tom Baker was the Doctor... so why should anyone else dare to like
Doctor Who when they don't? Just the like the woke brigade in life
who want everything they dislike cancelled.
No one is watching this show. It's being used by a bunch of sick and disgusting child grooming perverts to spread their own personal
immoral agendas.
Ratings of 1.58 million overnight mean NOBODY is watching this show.
This is basically the number of people who always have their TV tuned
in to BBC1 all day and never change channel while they are doing
something else.
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be cancelled on
YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they are content creators
Why would they be fans of Ncuti Gatwa or anything he stars in when
he's an effeminate, mentally ill, cross dressing pervert? Why would
the be fans of a show written by perverts who want to sexually groom
children to be like them?
using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon to make money from theirThey are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the entire
content.
nation.
The woke are a bunch of elitist bigots that think the whole world
revolves around them
and their disgusting perverted way of life,
and don't reflect society in general whatsoever. The main aim of
Hollywood has always been to legalise sex with children because the
whole place is full of pederasts.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vudqjq$1ufdb$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
The woke are a bunch of elitist bigots that think the
whole world revolves around them and their disgusting
perverted way of life, and don't reflect society in
general whatsoever. The main aim of Hollywood has always
been to legalise sex with children because the whole place
is full of pederasts.
Talk about contentless content.
"Contentless content" is quite an apt term coming from you!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 20:04, Blueshirt wrote:
I am not in the UK ...
In which case you are not in a position to comment.
I will comment so that others don't have to!
... but from what I see there doesn't seem to be too
too many people protesting on the streets over there about
the woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of the
nation couldn't give a shit.
They don't need to protest in the streets. It's all over the
newspapers. The people of Britain have had enough of wokery
and that's why most of them now support Nigel Farage and
Reform.
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until that
is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster and Nigel
Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only supposition
that a majority of people support them. If the majority of
people in the UK really supported Reform and were against
"wokery" them why did Labour get elected last July?
TV shows wouldn't be top of people's everyday agenda.
The majority of them have to go to work and live
their life... if they don't like a TV show I'm sure
they just switch over or go and do something else instead.
Of course, there will always be Angry of Tunbridge Wells who
sends an e-mail to the BBC and OFCOM, but I wouldn't think
those types constitute the mood of the entire nation.
Wait for the local election results.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <vue6sh$2aosd$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 24/04/2025 20:04, Blueshirt wrote:
... but from what I see there doesn't seem to be too
many people protesting on the streets over there about
the woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of
the nation couldn't give a shit.
They don't need to protest in the streets. It's all over the
newspapers. The people of Britain have had enough of wokery
and that's why most of them now support Nigel Farage and
Reform.
Wait for the local election results.
I hope REform goes nowhere.
Oh dear, your best mate isn't going to like that!!!
On 24/04/2025 9:10 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:.... but there's always Mummy's and/or Daddy's purses!! ;-P
In article <xn0p4wdb142wb7w000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
Not yet.
Go watch them then before you start piping up about Amazon
taking on "Doctor Who"... of course, to watch those shows you'd
probably have to pay money to Amazon and we all know that Bats
fly out of your wallet on those rare occasions that you do open
it.
--
Daniel70
On 25/04/2025 6:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
We watched "Reacher" together (all three seasons) and really"series"?? I thought you had been talking about the Tom Cruise Movies!!
enjoyed it. It's probably our favourite series on Amazon Prime.
--
Daniel70
On 25/04/2025 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 13:10, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xhja54dnqo003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to watch
them again... I have no desire to see those shows cancelled.
They are not for me so I find other shows to watch.
This is the way...
Then maybe do not watch.
How do you make others not watch this vile, degenerate, woke propaganda
that seeks to sexually groom children and impede the progress of men and
meritocracy?
"meritocracy"?? So if a WOMAN is given good story-lines, good production >staff, etc., you, Aggy, would have no problems with THAT.
REALLY??
This woke filth has to be systematically condemned at every opportunity
until no one wants to watch it and it stops being made.
Correct .... and the good stuff HAS to be lauded!!
The disgusting perverts that made it have to be driven out of film,--
television, theatre, and the entertainment industry.
Daniel70
On 25/04/2025 6:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
The Doctor wrote:.... but it IS still "content" .... so increases Binky's All Important
In article <vudqjq$1ufdb$3@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
The woke are a bunch of elitist bigots that think the
whole world revolves around them and their disgusting
perverted way of life, and don't reflect society in
general whatsoever. The main aim of Hollywood has always
been to legalise sex with children because the whole place
is full of pederasts.
Talk about contentless content.
"Contentless content" is quite an apt term coming from you!
Precious Post Count!!
--
Daniel70
On 25/04/2025 2:58 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be
cancelled on YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they
are content creators using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon
to make money from their content.
They are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the
entire nation.
Sorry!! Would you prefer these Content Creaters reflect the
mood of the miniscule minority (like yourself), Aggy??
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xu5u5li62s001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
How do you drive those types of people out of the
entertainment industry though?
Protest en masse?
I assume by "en masse" you mean something other than a
complaining post on a Usenet newsgroup?
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
On 25/04/2025 6:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
We watched "Reacher" together (all three seasons) and really
enjoyed it. It's probably our favourite series on Amazon
Prime.
"series"?? I thought you had been talking about the Tom Cruise
Movies!!
On 25/04/2025 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 13:10, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xhja54dnqo003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to watch
them again... I have no desire to see those shows cancelled.
They are not for me so I find other shows to watch.
This is the way...
Then maybe do not watch.
How do you make others not watch this vile, degenerate, woke
propaganda that seeks to sexually groom children and impede the
progress of men and meritocracy?
"meritocracy"?? So if a WOMAN is given good story-lines, good production staff, etc., you, Aggy, would have no problems with THAT.
REALLY??
This woke filth has to be systematically condemned at every
opportunity until no one wants to watch it and it stops being made.
Correct .... and the good stuff HAS to be lauded!!
The disgusting perverts that made it have to be driven out of film,
television, theatre, and the entertainment industry.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 25/04/2025 6:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
We watched "Reacher" together (all three seasons) and really"series"?? I thought you had been talking about the Tom Cruise
enjoyed it. It's probably our favourite series on Amazon
Prime.
Movies!!
Why would we talk about those? They weren't that good,
especially the second one. Tom Cruise is not big enough to
convincingly play Jack Reacher. The "Reacher" serials on Amazon
Prime are way better...
Unfortunately, as they were commissioned by Amazon for their
Prime Video streaming service they are unlikely to reach your
ABC any time soon...
I believe Amazon are now working on a spin-off to the series as
the "Reacher" series has been so well received by viewers and
critics.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xu5u5li62s001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
How do you drive those types of people out of the
entertainment industry though?
Protest en masse?
I assume by "en masse" you mean something other than a
complaining post on a Usenet newsgroup?
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
On 25/04/2025 11:28, Daniel70 wrote:
On 25/04/2025 2:32 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 13:10, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xhja54dnqo003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 23/04/2025 18:34, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Go to Amazon and get a real British showrunner that will
retcon the Timeless Child!
Be careful what you wish for... have you seen "Rings of
Power" or "The Wheel of Time"?
He needs a subscription to watch The Rings of Woke and The
Wheel of Woke. Season 3 of The Wheel of Woke has to be the
worst of the lot. Now they're set to totally destroy James
Bond.
I am not a fan of "Rings of Power" or "The Wheel of Time" but
like a normal person who doesn't get any enjoyment from a
television show, I just switched them off and choose not to watch
them again... I have no desire to see those shows cancelled.
They are not for me so I find other shows to watch.
This is the way...
Then maybe do not watch.
How do you make others not watch this vile, degenerate, woke
propaganda that seeks to sexually groom children and impede the
progress of men and meritocracy?
"meritocracy"?? So if a WOMAN is given good story-lines, good production
staff, etc., you, Aggy, would have no problems with THAT.
REALLY??
Doctor Who is not about women. It's a show about the male oriented genre
of science fiction. It's about men, father figures, masculinity, and >masculine values and heroism. Women can only be there in supporting
roles. The main protagonist must be always be male, masculine, and >heterosexual.
If you want a show about women then watch Wonder Woman or Supergirl.
Make a spin-off about Romana. There's was already The Sarah Jane
Adventures and no one ever complained about Sarah Jane being given good >storylines, good production staff, etc.
This woke filth has to be systematically condemned at every
opportunity until no one wants to watch it and it stops being made.
Correct .... and the good stuff HAS to be lauded!!
There's been no good stuff since 2017. The original Wonder Woman movie
for example. Look at how vile The Rings of Power is and The Wheel of
Time where men are systematically demeaned and all the characters are
turned gay which is not even in the books.
The disgusting perverts that made it have to be driven out of film,
television, theatre, and the entertainment industry.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
Daniel70 wrote:
On 25/04/2025 2:58 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be
cancelled on YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they
are content creators using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon
to make money from their content.
They are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the
entire nation.
Sorry!! Would you prefer these Content Creaters reflect the
mood of the miniscule minority (like yourself), Aggy??
I wish he'd make his own YouTube content about all the sexual
grooming that's taking place in "Doctor Who"... he needs to
spread this news to the unsuspecting majority who are placing
their children's lives in danger every time they sit down and
watch "Doctor Who"...
If it was entertaining enough I'd even subscribe!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 20:04, Blueshirt wrote:
I am not in the UK ...
In which case you are not in a position to comment.
I will comment so that others don't have to!
... but from what I see there doesn't seem to be too
too many people protesting on the streets over there about
the woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of the
nation couldn't give a shit.
They don't need to protest in the streets. It's all over the
newspapers. The people of Britain have had enough of wokery
and that's why most of them now support Nigel Farage and
Reform.
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until that
is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster and Nigel
Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only supposition
that a majority of people support them. If the majority of
people in the UK really supported Reform and were against
"wokery" them why did Labour get elected last July?
TV shows wouldn't be top of people's everyday agenda.
The majority of them have to go to work and live
their life... if they don't like a TV show I'm sure
they just switch over or go and do something else instead.
Of course, there will always be Angry of Tunbridge Wells who
sends an e-mail to the BBC and OFCOM, but I wouldn't think
those types constitute the mood of the entire nation.
Wait for the local election results.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-25 7:50 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:what are you grooming the doctor for
Daniel70 wrote:
On 25/04/2025 2:58 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 11:52, Blueshirt wrote:
A lot of the people calling for "Doctor Who" to be
cancelled on YouTube aren't even fans of the show, they
are content creators using "Doctor Who" as a bandwagon
to make money from their content.
They are content creators who are reflecting the mood of the
entire nation.
Sorry!! Would you prefer these Content Creaters reflect the
mood of the miniscule minority (like yourself), Aggy??
I wish he'd make his own YouTube content about all the sexual
grooming that's taking place in "Doctor Who"... he needs to
spread this news to the unsuspecting majority who are placing
their children's lives in danger every time they sit down and
watch "Doctor Who"...
If it was entertaining enough I'd even subscribe!
I realise that I am not a "genius" like Aggy (LOLOLOLOLOLOL) but I don't
understand why a writer would attempt to "sexually groom" children
around the world.
I mean the idea of grooming someone is to convince them that sex with
you is the best course of action or inevitable (simplified for binky).
So why would someone attempt to groom a child on the other side of the
world? A child who is totally anonymous on the other side of a screen.
Could Aggy be simply obsessing on a concept his right wing MAGA friends
taught him?
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 20:04, Blueshirt wrote:
I am not in the UK ...
In which case you are not in a position to comment.
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
... but from what I see there doesn't seem to be too
too many people protesting on the streets over there about
the woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of the
nation couldn't give a shit.
They don't need to protest in the streets. It's all over the
newspapers. The people of Britain have had enough of wokery
and that's why most of them now support Nigel Farage and
Reform.
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until that
is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster and Nigel
Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only supposition
that a majority of people support them. If the majority of
people in the UK really supported Reform and were against
"wokery" them why did Labour get elected last July?
Because of a rigged first past the post electoral system which favours
the Tories and Labour.
TV shows wouldn't be top of people's everyday agenda.
The majority of them have to go to work and live
their life... if they don't like a TV show I'm sure
they just switch over or go and do something else instead.
Of course, there will always be Angry of Tunbridge Wells who
sends an e-mail to the BBC and OFCOM, but I wouldn't think
those types constitute the mood of the entire nation.
Wait for the local election results.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
The council elections will be used as protest against the tyrannical
rule of Keir Starmer. Wokery will play a part in that ever since the
leader of Ingsoc tried to redefine the term "working people" for the
11th and definitive edition of the Newspeak Dictionary, so that no one
can claim that Ingsoc broke its promises to them.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until
that is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster
and Nigel Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only
supposition that a majority of people support them. If the
majority of people in the UK really supported Reform and
were against "wokery" them why did Labour get elected last
July?
Because of a rigged first past the post electoral system which
favours the Tories and Labour.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
The council elections will be used as protest against the
tyrannical rule of Keir Starmer. Wokery will play a part in
that ever since the leader of Ingsoc tried to redefine the
term "working people" for the 11th and definitive edition of
the Newspeak Dictionary, so that no one can claim that Ingsoc
broke its promises to them.
I realise that I am not a "genius" like Aggy (LOLOLOLOLOLOL)
but I don't understand why a writer would attempt to "sexually
groom" children around the world.
I mean the idea of grooming someone is to convince them that
sex with you is the best course of action or inevitable
(simplified for binky).
So why would someone attempt to groom a child on the other
side of the world?
A child who is totally anonymous on the other side of
a screen.
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xu5u5li62s001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
How do you drive those types of people out of the
entertainment industry though?
Protest en masse?
I assume by "en masse" you mean something other than a
complaining post on a Usenet newsgroup?
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
Dave Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
The Doctor wrote:
Dave Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Retcon Doctor Who! Dave the Timeless Child!!!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until
that is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster
and Nigel Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only
supposition that a majority of people support them. If the
majority of people in the UK really supported Reform and
were against "wokery" them why did Labour get elected last
July?
Because of a rigged first past the post electoral system which
favours the Tories and Labour.
Trust me, you don't want PR. We have it over here and it's a
balls. All you end up with is coalition governments... and
watered down policies when the parties have to make compromises.
PR elections might be more representative of people's views but
it leads to a lot of back-door wheeling and dealing and
manifesto policies being dumped to get things through. In other
words, political chicanery!
If you think Nigel Farage is the answer then I'm not sure what
the question is... but if voting could really change anything,
it would be made illegal.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
The council elections will be used as protest against the
tyrannical rule of Keir Starmer. Wokery will play a part in
that ever since the leader of Ingsoc tried to redefine the
term "working people" for the 11th and definitive edition of
the Newspeak Dictionary, so that no one can claim that Ingsoc
broke its promises to them.
If you think Kier Starmer is tyrannical you should move to
Russia, China or North Korea! See how far your George Orwell
quotes get you there!!!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
Idlehands wrote:
I realise that I am not a "genius" like Aggy (LOLOLOLOLOLOL)
but I don't understand why a writer would attempt to "sexually
groom" children around the world.
Yeah, it's much easier if they are in your choir or they have to
bring candles and the holy oils to the sacristy for you...
I mean the idea of grooming someone is to convince them that
sex with you is the best course of action or inevitable
(simplified for binky).
So why would someone attempt to groom a child on the other
side of the world?
I dunno... but I'm sure a few joined missions to do exactly that!
A child who is totally anonymous on the other side of
a screen.
Well... if "Lux" was anything to go by, the other side of the
screen is your living room! :-)
On 26/04/2025 12:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted.
The Doctor wrote:Sorry!! Wasn't "Nuremburg" more about the trial AFTER the event (WWII)??
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4xu5u5li62s001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
How do you drive those types of people out of the
entertainment industry though?
Protest en masse?
I assume by "en masse" you mean something other than a
complaining post on a Usenet newsgroup?
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
Still, maybe we could put Binky on Trial for Crimes against 'Doctor Who'.
--
Daniel70
On 26/04/2025 8:43 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Well, I don't know about "Dave the Timeless Child" ...... maybe "Dave
Dave Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Retcon Doctor Who! Dave the Timeless Child!!!
the Man Child"!!
--
Daniel70
On 26/04/2025 12:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
Sorry!! Wasn't "Nuremburg" more about the trial AFTER the
event (WWII)??
Still, maybe we could put Binky on Trial for Crimes against
'Doctor Who'.
In article <xn0p50a5c7yi2wm003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
London in the UK!
In article <vuif9t$28o6s$2@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 26/04/2025 8:43 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Well, I don't know about "Dave the Timeless Child" ...... maybe "Dave
Dave Doctor Who! Retcon the Timeless Child!
Retcon Doctor Who! Dave the Timeless Child!!!
the Man Child"!!
Spinning are You Dannyboy?
Daniel70 wrote:
On 26/04/2025 12:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry!! Wasn't "Nuremburg" more about the trial AFTER the
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
event (WWII)??
History isn't your thing I see...
Not that there wasn't trials at Nuremberg after the war, but--
there was a reason the Allies chose to hold the trials there!
Still, maybe we could put Binky on Trial for Crimes against
'Doctor Who'.
Well... we could do THAT!
Daniel70 wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
On 26/04/2025 12:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry!! Wasn't "Nuremburg" more about the trial AFTER the
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
event (WWII)??
History isn't your thing I see...
Not that there wasn't trials at Nuremberg after the war, but
there was a reason the Allies chose to hold the trials there!
Still, maybe we could put Binky on Trial for Crimes against
'Doctor Who'.
Well... we could do THAT!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p50a5c7yi2wm003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
London in the UK!
The inhabitants of Edmonton, Alberta want to know when you are
going there... and do you need a lift to the airport?
On 26/04/2025 10:28 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 26/04/2025 12:04 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Sorry!! Wasn't "Nuremburg" more about the trial AFTER the
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
event (WWII)??
History isn't your thing I see...
Ah!! So you mean ....
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_rallies
^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted.
Not that there wasn't trials at Nuremberg after the war, but
there was a reason the Allies chose to hold the trials there!
Still, maybe we could put Binky on Trial for Crimes against
--'Doctor Who'.
Well... we could do THAT!
Daniel70
Time to resist REform , the CaUP and Labour!
In article <xn0p50d7382mlzu002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p50a5c7yi2wm003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
London in the UK!
The inhabitants of Edmonton, Alberta want to know when you are
going there... and do you need a lift to the airport?
An election in under way in Canada!
On 26/04/2025 11:07 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <xn0p50d7382mlzu002@post.eweka.nl>,So WHAT?? Is no one allowed to leave Canada whilst an election is on,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p50a5c7yi2wm003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
London in the UK!
The inhabitants of Edmonton, Alberta want to know when you are
going there... and do you need a lift to the airport?
An election in under way in Canada!
Binky??
--
Daniel70
In article <vuhdcb$17m95$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 20:04, Blueshirt wrote:
I am not in the UK ...
In which case you are not in a position to comment.
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
... but from what I see there doesn't seem to be too
too many people protesting on the streets over there about
the woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of the
nation couldn't give a shit.
They don't need to protest in the streets. It's all over the
newspapers. The people of Britain have had enough of wokery
and that's why most of them now support Nigel Farage and
Reform.
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until that
is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster and Nigel
Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only supposition
that a majority of people support them. If the majority of
people in the UK really supported Reform and were against
"wokery" them why did Labour get elected last July?
Because of a rigged first past the post electoral system which favours
the Tories and Labour.
TV shows wouldn't be top of people's everyday agenda.
The majority of them have to go to work and live
their life... if they don't like a TV show I'm sure
they just switch over or go and do something else instead.
Of course, there will always be Angry of Tunbridge Wells who
sends an e-mail to the BBC and OFCOM, but I wouldn't think
those types constitute the mood of the entire nation.
Wait for the local election results.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
The council elections will be used as protest against the tyrannical
rule of Keir Starmer. Wokery will play a part in that ever since the
leader of Ingsoc tried to redefine the term "working people" for the
11th and definitive edition of the Newspeak Dictionary, so that no one
can claim that Ingsoc broke its promises to them.
Time for a massive LDem win!
The Doctor wrote:
Time to resist REform , the CaUP and Labour!
Time to blow up the lot of them more like!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until
that is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster
and Nigel Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only
supposition that a majority of people support them. If the
majority of people in the UK really supported Reform and
were against "wokery" them why did Labour get elected last
July?
Because of a rigged first past the post electoral system which
favours the Tories and Labour.
Trust me, you don't want PR. We have it over here and it's a
balls. All you end up with is coalition governments... and
watered down policies when the parties have to make compromises.
PR elections might be more representative of people's views but
it leads to a lot of back-door wheeling and dealing and
manifesto policies being dumped to get things through. In other
words, political chicanery!
If you think Nigel Farage is the answer then I'm not sure what
the question is... but if voting could really change anything,
it would be made illegal.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
The council elections will be used as protest against the
tyrannical rule of Keir Starmer. Wokery will play a part in
that ever since the leader of Ingsoc tried to redefine the
term "working people" for the 11th and definitive edition of
the Newspeak Dictionary, so that no one can claim that Ingsoc
broke its promises to them.
If you think Kier Starmer is tyrannical you should move to
Russia, China or North Korea! See how far your George Orwell
quotes get you there!!!
On 26/04/2025 03:40, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuhdcb$17m95$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 24/04/2025 20:04, Blueshirt wrote:
I am not in the UK ...
In which case you are not in a position to comment.
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
... but from what I see there doesn't seem to be too
too many people protesting on the streets over there about
the woke content of TV shows. In fact, I reckon most of the
nation couldn't give a shit.
They don't need to protest in the streets. It's all over the
newspapers. The people of Britain have had enough of wokery
and that's why most of them now support Nigel Farage and
Reform.
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until that
is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster and Nigel
Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only supposition
that a majority of people support them. If the majority of
people in the UK really supported Reform and were against
"wokery" them why did Labour get elected last July?
Because of a rigged first past the post electoral system which favours
the Tories and Labour.
TV shows wouldn't be top of people's everyday agenda.
The majority of them have to go to work and live
their life... if they don't like a TV show I'm sure
they just switch over or go and do something else instead.
Of course, there will always be Angry of Tunbridge Wells who
sends an e-mail to the BBC and OFCOM, but I wouldn't think
those types constitute the mood of the entire nation.
Wait for the local election results.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
The council elections will be used as protest against the tyrannical
rule of Keir Starmer. Wokery will play a part in that ever since the
leader of Ingsoc tried to redefine the term "working people" for the
11th and definitive edition of the Newspeak Dictionary, so that no one
can claim that Ingsoc broke its promises to them.
Time for a massive LDem win!
I voted SDP. The LibDems are traitors.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British. Your ancestors chose not to be 100 years ago.
Reform UK might seem to have a lot of support over there, and
they may be doing well in some opinion polls... but until
that is translated in to a majority of seats in Westminster
and Nigel Farage is the UK's Prime Minister, then it's only
supposition that a majority of people support them. If the
majority of people in the UK really supported Reform and
were against "wokery" them why did Labour get elected last
July?
Because of a rigged first past the post electoral system which
favours the Tories and Labour.
Trust me, you don't want PR. We have it over here and it's a
balls. All you end up with is coalition governments... and
Good. That is exactly what we need. No more tyrants like Keir Starmer.
watered down policies when the parties have to make compromises.
Good. No more stupid one party populist policies that the other half of
the population does not support.
PR elections might be more representative of people's views but
it leads to a lot of back-door wheeling and dealing and
manifesto policies being dumped to get things through. In other
words, political chicanery!
In other words the politicians have to listen to the actual population
and not just to their party members.
If you think Nigel Farage is the answer then I'm not sure what
the question is... but if voting could really change anything,
it would be made illegal.
People have no choice but to vote for Nigel Farage even if they can't
stand him because he's the only one speaking common sense.
Elections are a good way to gauge public opinion but I still
don't think "wokery" in television shows is top of that many
people's agenda when they go out to vote... especially in
council elections which are usually more about local issues.
The council elections will be used as protest against the
tyrannical rule of Keir Starmer. Wokery will play a part in
that ever since the leader of Ingsoc tried to redefine the
term "working people" for the 11th and definitive edition of
the Newspeak Dictionary, so that no one can claim that Ingsoc
broke its promises to them.
If you think Kier Starmer is tyrannical you should move to
Russia, China or North Korea! See how far your George Orwell
Those are the countries that Kier Starmer idolises along with their leaders.
quotes get you there!!!
Russia is Eurasia. China is Eastasia. The United Kingdom and America are >Oceania constantly waging way against either Eurasia or Eastasia. Labour
is Ingsoc. Political correctness is newspeak and goodthink. Cancel
culture is the two minutes hate. The anti-sex league is 4th wave
feminism. Starmer looks exactly like the poster of Big Brother on the
cover of the book.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
On 26/04/2025 13:29, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Time to resist REform , the CaUP and Labour!
Time to blow up the lot of them more like!
Do you want to be the next Guy Fawkes?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <vuinma$2frlt$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:07 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <xn0p50d7382mlzu002@post.eweka.nl>,So WHAT?? Is no one allowed to leave Canada whilst an election is on,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p50a5c7yi2wm003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
London in the UK!
The inhabitants of Edmonton, Alberta want to know when you are
going there... and do you need a lift to the airport?
An election in under way in Canada!
Binky??
I hear the Current DonaldTrumpish Prime Minister of Australia is up for election.
In article <vujmh3$36t6h$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
Russia is Eurasia. China is Eastasia. The United Kingdom and America are
Oceania constantly waging way against either Eurasia or Eastasia. Labour
is Ingsoc. Political correctness is newspeak and goodthink. Cancel
culture is the two minutes hate. The anti-sex league is 4th wave
feminism. Starmer looks exactly like the poster of Big Brother on the
cover of the book.
I trust the Left as much as I trust the right.
On 27/04/2025 11:21 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <vujmh3$36t6h$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
<Snip>
Russia is Eurasia. China is Eastasia. The United Kingdom and America are >>> Oceania constantly waging way against either Eurasia or Eastasia. Labour >>> is Ingsoc. Political correctness is newspeak and goodthink. Cancel
culture is the two minutes hate. The anti-sex league is 4th wave
feminism. Starmer looks exactly like the poster of Big Brother on the
cover of the book.
I trust the Left as much as I trust the right.
So YOU, Binky, trust no-one. O.K., good to know!!
--
Daniel70
In article <vul784$p28g$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 27/04/2025 5:44 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <vuinma$2frlt$1@dont-email.me>,Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ... noted!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:07 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <xn0p50d7382mlzu002@post.eweka.nl>,So WHAT?? Is no one allowed to leave Canada whilst an election is on,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p50a5c7yi2wm003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave?
Rally organising.
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
London in the UK!
The inhabitants of Edmonton, Alberta want to know when you are
going there... and do you need a lift to the airport?
An election in under way in Canada!
Binky??
I hear the Current DonaldTrumpish Prime Minister of Australia is up for
election.
So will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out of power?
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vul784$p28g$1@dont-email.me>,^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 27/04/2025 5:44 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuinma$2frlt$1@dont-email.me>,Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ... noted!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:07 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <xn0p50d7382mlzu002@post.eweka.nl>,So WHAT?? Is no one allowed to leave Canada whilst an election is on, >>>>> Binky??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p50a5c7yi2wm003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Rally organising.
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave? >>>>>>>>>>>>
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
London in the UK!
The inhabitants of Edmonton, Alberta want to know when you are
going there... and do you need a lift to the airport?
An election in under way in Canada!
I hear the Current DonaldTrumpish Prime Minister of Australia is up for >>>> election.
"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
So will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out of power? >>
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor Party
*IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about THE ONLY >equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ... noted!!^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vul784$p28g$1@dont-email.me>,"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 27/04/2025 5:44 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-
In article <vuinma$2frlt$1@dont-email.me>,Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ... noted!!
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:07 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted
In article <xn0p50d7382mlzu002@post.eweka.nl>,So WHAT?? Is no one allowed to leave Canada whilst an election is on, >>>>> Binky??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p50a5c7yi2wm003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4z1536qjaz9003@news.eternal-september.org>, >>>>>>>>>> Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p4ys6w6eg3pk003@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Rally organising.
So what en masse complaining are you doing then Dave? >>>>>>>>>>>>
Like Nuremberg, or something a bit smaller?
London stlye!
London Ontario?
London in the UK!
The inhabitants of Edmonton, Alberta want to know when you are
going there... and do you need a lift to the airport?
An election in under way in Canada!
I hear the Current DonaldTrumpish Prime Minister of Australia is up for >>>> election.
Peadophile talker noted
So will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out of
power?
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor Party
*IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ... noted!!
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British.
Your ancestors chose not to be 100 years ago.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 13:29, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Time to resist REform , the CaUP and Labour!
Time to blow up the lot of them more like!
Do you want to be the next Guy Fawkes?
My Uncle Joe did!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p54mph1g09h006@post.eweka.nl>,prove it
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 13:29, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Time to resist REform , the CaUP and Labour!
Time to blow up the lot of them more like!
Do you want to be the next Guy Fawkes?
My Uncle Joe did!
How?
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
So will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
of power?
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor
Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about
THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ...
noted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from the
other!
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from the
other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands, Ireland is
what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-PSo will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
of power?
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor
Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about
THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ...
noted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a
particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from
the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from the
other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands, Ireland is
what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England, Scotland and
Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain plus Northern Ireland and
several hundred small islands.
Several more small islands (and the Gibraltar peninsula) are Crown Dependencies of the United Kingdom but not legally part of it.
Ireland is one landmass of 2 nations (the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland), one of which is part of the United Kingdom.
There is a political mechanism permanently in place which would allow Northern Ireland to transfer from the United Kingdom and join the Republic
of Ireland if a majority of its people elect to do so.
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain plus
Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
Several more small islands (and the Gibraltar peninsula) are
Crown Dependencies of the United Kingdom but not legally part
of it.
Ireland is one landmass of 2 nations (the Republic of Ireland
and Northern Ireland), one of which is part of the United
Kingdom.
There is a political mechanism permanently in place which
would allow Northern Ireland to transfer from the United
Kingdom and join the Republic of Ireland if a majority of its
people elect to do so.
On 30/04/2025 10:33 pm, The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain
plus Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
YES, of course!! I know that .... but you know how my memory
is!! ;-P
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:^^^^^<-Peadophile talker noted!
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
So will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
of power?
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor
Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about
THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ...
^^^^^<-PAedophile talker notednoted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a
particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P
--
Daniel70
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from the
other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands, Ireland is
what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
--
Daniel70
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from the
other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands, Ireland is
what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England, Scotland and
Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain plus Northern Ireland and
several hundred small islands.
Several more small islands (and the Gibraltar peninsula) are Crown
Dependencies of the United Kingdom but not legally part of it.
Ireland is one landmass of 2 nations (the Republic of Ireland and Northern
Ireland), one of which is part of the United Kingdom.
There is a political mechanism permanently in place which would allow
Northern Ireland to transfer from the United Kingdom and join the Republic
of Ireland if a majority of its people elect to do so.
--
There’s no point in being grown up if you can’t act a little childish
sometimes.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from
the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
Wow! Geography isn't your strong point I see...
Great Britain is an island, Ireland is a separate Island. This
is a geographical fact!
On 30/04/2025 10:33 pm, The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from the
other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands, Ireland is
what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England, Scotland and
Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain plus Northern Ireland and
several hundred small islands.
YES, of course!! I know that .... but you know how my memory is!! ;-P
Several more small islands (and the Gibraltar peninsula) are CrownOH!! And welcome back, Mike. Long time, no hear!!
Dependencies of the United Kingdom but not legally part of it.
Ireland is one landmass of 2 nations (the Republic of Ireland and Northern >> Ireland), one of which is part of the United Kingdom.
There is a political mechanism permanently in place which would allow
Northern Ireland to transfer from the United Kingdom and join the Republic >> of Ireland if a majority of its people elect to do so.
--
Daniel70
The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain plus
Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
Several more small islands (and the Gibraltar peninsula) are
Crown Dependencies of the United Kingdom but not legally part
of it.
Ireland is one landmass of 2 nations (the Republic of Ireland
and Northern Ireland), one of which is part of the United
Kingdom.
There is a political mechanism permanently in place which
would allow Northern Ireland to transfer from the United
Kingdom and join the Republic of Ireland if a majority of its
people elect to do so.
No need to add anything, except... welcome back!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:33 pm, The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain
plus Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
YES, of course!! I know that .... but you know how my memory
is!! ;-P
Who needs schools and colleges... RADW is all anyone needs for
an education!
We even have people with PhD's here! :-)
In article <xn0p560jr1ftych000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
Wow! Geography isn't your strong point I see...
Great Britain is an island, Ireland is a separate Island.
This is a geographical fact!
We can read maps.
In article <xn0p5614s1gof0i006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Who needs schools and colleges... RADW is all anyone needs
for an education!
We even have people with PhD's here! :-)
And you?
And then we end up with Ireland peacekeeping from the UN.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p560jr1ftych000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
Wow! Geography isn't your strong point I see...
Great Britain is an island, Ireland is a separate Island.
This is a geographical fact!
We can read maps.
Some people can't, obviously! ;-)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5614s1gof0i006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Who needs schools and colleges... RADW is all anyone needs
for an education!
We even have people with PhD's here! :-)
And you?
I've told you before Dave, I attended the University of Life. My
travels have educated me better than any PhD!
Living in London and New York opened my naive Irish eyes and
gave me all the education and worldliness that I needed to
survive this rat race we call life! Now I am back home among the
green fields living a quiet life and spending time with my
favourite online community.
The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain plus
Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
Several more small islands (and the Gibraltar peninsula) are
Crown Dependencies of the United Kingdom but not legally part
of it.
Ireland is one landmass of 2 nations (the Republic of Ireland
and Northern Ireland), one of which is part of the United
Kingdom.
There is a political mechanism permanently in place which
would allow Northern Ireland to transfer from the United
Kingdom and join the Republic of Ireland if a majority of its
people elect to do so.
No need to add anything, except... welcome back!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:33 pm, The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain
plus Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
YES, of course!! I know that .... but you know how my memory
is!! ;-P
Who needs schools and colleges... RADW is all anyone needs for
an education!
We even have people with PhD's here! :-)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5614s1gof0i006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Who needs schools and colleges... RADW is all anyone needs
for an education!
We even have people with PhD's here! :-)
And you?
I've told you before Dave, I attended the University of Life. My
travels have educated me better than any PhD!
Living in London and New York opened my naive Irish eyes and
gave me all the education and worldliness that I needed to
survive this rat race we call life! Now I am back home among the
green fields living a quiet life and spending time with my
favourite online community.
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-PSo will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
of power?
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor
Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about
THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ...
noted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a
particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the
doubt.
In article <vusv53$43e3$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 26/04/2025 11:19, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 25/04/2025 09:23, Blueshirt wrote:
I will comment so that others don't have to!
You're still not in the UK.
I will be tomorrow, does that count?
If I take my laptop with me to Belfast can I post legitimate
comments then, or do I have to actually be on the mainland
before I can have an opinion?
You have to be British.
Really? In that case I'll pass... thanks.
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come from the
other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands, Ireland is
what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
and your ancestry is from?
On 30/04/2025 14:33, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:33 pm, The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-PWell, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
No.
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain
plus Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
YES, of course!! I know that .... but you know how my memory
is!! ;-P
Who needs schools and colleges... RADW is all anyone needs for
an education!
We even have people with PhD's here! :-)
What do Aggie's Phantasmagorical Delusions have to do with education? ;)
On 30/04/2025 14:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-P
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain plus
Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
Several more small islands (and the Gibraltar peninsula) are
Crown Dependencies of the United Kingdom but not legally part
of it.
Ireland is one landmass of 2 nations (the Republic of Ireland
and Northern Ireland), one of which is part of the United
Kingdom.
There is a political mechanism permanently in place which
would allow Northern Ireland to transfer from the United
Kingdom and join the Republic of Ireland if a majority of its
people elect to do so.
No need to add anything, except... welcome back!
I've been meaning to post for a couple of weeks but I'm stuck trying to
untangle the plot holes in Robot Revolution. Been a long time since that happened! Anyway, I've been monitoring and the season so far? Thumbs mainly up. Feels like Doctor Who.
--
There’s no point in being grown up if you can’t act a little childish
sometimes.
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted!
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:Do you take PITY on Binky??
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-PSo will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
of power?
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor
Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about
THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ...
noted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a
particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the
doubt.
--
Daniel70
On 1/05/2025 4:58 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Oh!! Which "online community" is that, Blueshirt?? ;-P
In article <xn0p5614s1gof0i006@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Who needs schools and colleges... RADW is all anyone needs
for an education!
We even have people with PhD's here! :-)
And you?
I've told you before Dave, I attended the University of Life. My
travels have educated me better than any PhD!
Living in London and New York opened my naive Irish eyes and
gave me all the education and worldliness that I needed to
survive this rat race we call life! Now I am back home among the
green fields living a quiet life and spending time with my
favourite online community.
--
Daniel70
On 1/05/2025 5:15 pm, The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 14:33, Blueshirt wrote:And I thought Aggy used big words!! ;-P
Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:33 pm, The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-PWell, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
from the other!
No.
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain
plus Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
YES, of course!! I know that .... but you know how my memory
is!! ;-P
Who needs schools and colleges... RADW is all anyone needs for
an education!
We even have people with PhD's here! :-)
What do Aggie's Phantasmagorical Delusions have to do with education? ;)
--
Daniel70
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:Do you take PITY on Binky??
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-PSo will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
of power?
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor
Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about
THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ...
noted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a
particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the
doubt.
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:Do you take PITY on Binky??
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-PSo will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out >>>>>>> of power?"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor
Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about >>>>>> THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ...
noted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a >>>>> particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the
doubt.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the fuck up and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
On 30/04/2025 14:16, Blueshirt wrote:
No need to add anything, except... welcome back!
I've been meaning to post for a couple of weeks but I'm stuck
trying to untangle the plot holes in Robot Revolution. Been a
long time since that happened!
Anyway, I've been monitoring and the season so far?
Thumbs mainly up. Feels like Doctor Who.
On 1/05/2025 4:58 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Now I am back home among the green fields living a
quiet life and spending time with my favourite
online community.
Oh!! Which "online community" is that, Blueshirt?? ;-P
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:Do you take PITY on Binky??
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-PSo will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out >>>>>>>> of power?"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor >>>>>>> Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about >>>>>>> THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ... >>>>>>> noted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a >>>>>> particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the
doubt.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
--
Daniel70
The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 14:16, Blueshirt wrote:
No need to add anything, except... welcome back!
I've been meaning to post for a couple of weeks but I'm stuck
trying to untangle the plot holes in Robot Revolution. Been a
long time since that happened!
I thought you were going to say you've been trying to untangle
the [very] in-depth reviews and rants that have posted on RADW
for the last couple of weeks!!! ;-)
Anyway, I've been monitoring and the season so far?
Thumbs mainly up. Feels like Doctor Who.
As far as concise reviews go, that's about right.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 1/05/2025 4:58 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Oh!! Which "online community" is that, Blueshirt?? ;-P
Now I am back home among the green fields living a
quiet life and spending time with my favourite
online community.
If I told you that I'd have to shoot you...
BUT, as I like you I will give you a clue... there is this
community that exists in the dark recesses of the web where
people go to discuss everyday world topics, like religion,
politics, sexual perversion, statistics, grammar, geography,
sports, dog grooming (or something like that) etc. But, and
here's the really sneaky thing, to keep it all a secret and to
stop outsiders from finding this private community they disguise
their chat room as a place to discuss an old British sci-fi TV
show... and... even more clever than that, some of them pretend
to be idiots just to throw intelligent people with PhD's off the
scent so they don't uncover this treasure trove of online
knowledge! How smart is that?
Which probably explains why you've never heard of it...
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:Do you take PITY on Binky??
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-28 3:51 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 4:52 am, The Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-PSo will Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia, get elected out >>>>>>>> of power?"Albanese, the Donald Trump of Australia"??
Sure Anthony Albanese, the Federal Leader of The Australian Labor >>>>>>> Party *IS* the Political Leader of Australia .... but that's about >>>>>>> THE ONLY equivalence between Him and Trump!!
Failure to answer Question asked specifically of YOU, Binky, ... >>>>>>> noted!!
"Get elected out of power"?
Elected "to decide on or choose, especially to choose a person for a >>>>>> particular job, by voting:"
I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language.
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of
the doubt.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the fuck up and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Daniel70 wrote:
On 1/05/2025 4:58 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Oh!! Which "online community" is that, Blueshirt?? ;-P
Now I am back home among the green fields living a
quiet life and spending time with my favourite
online community.
If I told you that I'd have to shoot you...
BUT, as I like you I will give you a clue... there is this
community that exists in the dark recesses of the web where
people go to discuss everyday world topics, like religion,
politics, sexual perversion, statistics, grammar, geography,
sports, dog grooming (or something like that) etc. But, and
here's the really sneaky thing, to keep it all a secret and to
stop outsiders from finding this private community they disguise
their chat room as a place to discuss an old British sci-fi TV
show... and... even more clever than that, some of them pretend
to be idiots just to throw intelligent people with PhD's off the
scent so they don't uncover this treasure trove of online
knowledge! How smart is that?
Which probably explains why you've never heard of it...
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedDo you take PITY on Binky??I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language. >>>>>>>"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the >>>>> doubt.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
In article <xn0p5a8zs15a3g1002@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 14:16, Blueshirt wrote:
No need to add anything, except... welcome back!
I've been meaning to post for a couple of weeks but I'm stuck
trying to untangle the plot holes in Robot Revolution. Been a
long time since that happened!
I thought you were going to say you've been trying to untangle
the [very] in-depth reviews and rants that have posted on RADW
for the last couple of weeks!!! ;-)
Anyway, I've been monitoring and the season so far?
Thumbs mainly up. Feels like Doctor Who.
As far as concise reviews go, that's about right.
WE all habve our unique style.
On 2/05/2025 12:00 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Umm! Umm! Is it called .... Umm! I forget!! ;-)
On 1/05/2025 4:58 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Oh!! Which "online community" is that, Blueshirt?? ;-P
Now I am back home among the green fields living a
quiet life and spending time with my favourite
online community.
If I told you that I'd have to shoot you...
BUT, as I like you I will give you a clue... there is this
community that exists in the dark recesses of the web where
people go to discuss everyday world topics, like religion,
politics, sexual perversion, statistics, grammar, geography,
sports, dog grooming (or something like that) etc. But, and
here's the really sneaky thing, to keep it all a secret and to
stop outsiders from finding this private community they disguise
their chat room as a place to discuss an old British sci-fi TV
show... and... even more clever than that, some of them pretend
to be idiots just to throw intelligent people with PhD's off the
scent so they don't uncover this treasure trove of online
knowledge! How smart is that?
Which probably explains why you've never heard of it...
--
Daniel70
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedDo you take PITY on Binky??I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language. >>>>>>>>"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the >>>>>> doubt.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
On 2/05/2025 5:59 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <xn0p5a8zs15a3g1002@post.eweka.nl>,"habve" we, Binky??
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 14:16, Blueshirt wrote:
No need to add anything, except... welcome back!
I've been meaning to post for a couple of weeks but I'm stuck
trying to untangle the plot holes in Robot Revolution. Been a
long time since that happened!
I thought you were going to say you've been trying to untangle
the [very] in-depth reviews and rants that have posted on RADW
for the last couple of weeks!!! ;-)
Anyway, I've been monitoring and the season so far?
Thumbs mainly up. Feels like Doctor Who.
As far as concise reviews go, that's about right.
WE all habve our unique style.
--
Daniel70
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
On 30/04/2025 14:16, Blueshirt wrote:
The Last Doctor wrote:
On 30/04/2025 11:48, Daniel70 wrote:
On 29/04/2025 11:39 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Ireland is what's left of that second Island!! ;-Pfrom the other!Great Britain is one island, Ireland is another. I come
Well, Great Britain is one and a bit (major'ish) Islands,
No.
Great Britain is one landmass of three nations (England,
Scotland and Wales). The United Kingdom is Great Britain plus
Northern Ireland and several hundred small islands.
Several more small islands (and the Gibraltar peninsula) are
Crown Dependencies of the United Kingdom but not legally part
of it.
Ireland is one landmass of 2 nations (the Republic of Ireland
and Northern Ireland), one of which is part of the United
Kingdom.
There is a political mechanism permanently in place which
would allow Northern Ireland to transfer from the United
Kingdom and join the Republic of Ireland if a majority of its
people elect to do so.
No need to add anything, except... welcome back!
I've been meaning to post for a couple of weeks but I'm stuck trying to untangle the plot holes in Robot Revolution. Been a long time since that happened! Anyway, I've been monitoring and the season so far? Thumbs mainly up. Feels like Doctor Who.
Idlehands wrote:^^^^^<-paedophile talker noted
On 2025-05-02 5:41 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
vvvvv<-paedophile talker noted
^^^^^<-paedophile talker noted
Well that was a cute red herring binky, any more libellous comments you
^^^^^<-paedophile talker notedwant to throw my way?
Personally I have no trouble with the law but then I don't run a dial-up
ISP that is rumoured to be the hub of child porn sharing.
Who would suspect a dial-up? It's only a rumour but binky sure glosses
over it with his attempts of misdirection.hey look , it's the two team tit
The Doctor wrote:
In article <BECdnVqAqs17wYj1nZ2dnZfqnPEAAAAA@giganews.com>,vvvvv<-paedophile talker noted
% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:
Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-02 5:41 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P >>>>>>
^^^^^<-paedophile talker noted^^^^^<-paedophile talker notedOh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??
^^^^^<-paedophile talker noted
Well that was a cute red herring binky, any more libellous comments you
want to throw my way?
Personally I have no trouble with the law but then I don't run a dial-up >>>> ISP that is rumoured to be the hub of child porn sharing.
Who would suspect a dial-up? It's only a rumour but binky sure glosses >>
all i know is a canadian place with two teams should always have the cupover it with his attempts of misdirection.hey look , it's the two team tit
Tit wits you mean.
In article <vv2b0h$11cl4$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedDo you take PITY on Binky??I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language. >>>>>>>>>"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P
I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the >>>>>>> doubt.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
On 2025-05-02 5:41 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
Well that was a cute red herring binky, any more libellous comments you want to throw my way?
Personally I have no trouble with the law but then I don't run a dial-up
ISP that is rumoured to be the hub of child porn sharing.
Who would suspect a dial-up? It's only a rumour but binky sure glosses
over it with his attempts of misdirection.
On 01/05/2025 07:54, The Last Doctor wrote:
I've been meaning to post for a couple of weeks but I'm
stuck trying to untangle the plot holes in Robot Revolution.
Been a long time since that happened! Anyway, I've been
monitoring and the season so far? Thumbs mainly up. Feels
like Doctor Who.
Since when did the Doctor go around sexually harassing other
protagonists, even the villains, and calling them babes, and
hun, even after they told him to stop, and saying his
companion's mum should whistle up his arse? Since when was the
Doctor an incel?
This is not Doctor Who or feel like it in any way.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 01/05/2025 07:54, The Last Doctor wrote:
I've been meaning to post for a couple of weeks but I'm
stuck trying to untangle the plot holes in Robot Revolution.
Been a long time since that happened! Anyway, I've been
monitoring and the season so far? Thumbs mainly up. Feels
like Doctor Who.
Since when did the Doctor go around sexually harassing other
protagonists, even the villains, and calling them babes, and
hun, even after they told him to stop, and saying his
companion's mum should whistle up his arse? Since when was the
Doctor an incel?
Can we move on from the "Babes" thing? A new episode of Doctor
Who dropped online this morning (iPlayer & Disney+) and ...
SPOILERS
SPOILERS
The Doctor doesn't call anyone "Babes"!
It must be your lucky day...
This is not Doctor Who or feel like it in any way.
It's Doctor Who Jim, just not as you know it!
On 3/05/2025 8:58 am, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-02 5:41 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
Well that was a cute red herring binky, any more libellous comments you
want to throw my way?
Personally I have no trouble with the law but then I don't run a dial-up
ISP that is rumoured to be the hub of child porn sharing.
Some 'hub' .... with, what, three customers .... and, I'm guessing, none
of them PAYING customers!!
Who would suspect a dial-up? It's only a rumour but binky sure glosses
over it with his attempts of misdirection.
But WHAT must Mummy think??
--
Daniel70
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vv2b0h$11cl4$1@dont-email.me>,vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedDo you take PITY on Binky??I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the >>>>>>>> doubt.I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language. >>>>>>>>>>"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P >>>>>>>>
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
--
Daniel70
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vv2b0h$11cl4$1@dont-email.me>,vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedDo you take PITY on Binky??I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of the >>>>>>>>> doubt.I think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language. >>>>>>>>>>>"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P >>>>>>>>>
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
pugrey,
intimidation,
...
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,And YOU, Binky, know this because .............
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vv2b0h$11cl4$1@dont-email.me>,vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedDo you take PITY on Binky??I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit >>>>>>>>>> of theI think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English >>>>>>>>>>>> language."I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P >>>>>>>>>>
doubt.
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P >>>>>>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
pugrey,
intimidation,
...
On 5/3/2025 08:58, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??
Lying witness,And YOU, Binky, know this because .............
Falsifying evidence,
pugrey,
intimidation,
...
I'd like to know what pugrey is.
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP<
And YOU, Binky, know this because .............
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
pugrey,
intimidation,
...
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,And YOU, Binky, know this because .............
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vv2b0h$11cl4$1@dont-email.me>,vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedDo you take PITY on Binky??I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit of theI think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English language. >>>>>>>>>>>>"I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P >>>>>>>>>>
doubt.
Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P >>>>>>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
pugrey,
intimidation,
...
--
Daniel70
On 3/05/2025 10:48 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv4r0l$3b42r$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 3/05/2025 8:58 am, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-02 5:41 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:<CHOP>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??Looks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P >>>>>>
Well that was a cute red herring binky, any more libellous comments you
want to throw my way?
Personally I have no trouble with the law but then I don't run a dial-up >>>> ISP that is rumoured to be the hub of child porn sharing.
Some 'hub' .... with, what, three customers .... and, I'm guessing, none >>> of them PAYING customers!!
Who would suspect a dial-up? It's only a rumour but binky sure glosses >>>> over it with his attempts of misdirection.
But WHAT must Mummy think??
Lying Idlehands can never tell the truth.
But WHAT must Mummy think??
On 5/3/2025 08:58, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv2b0h$11cl4$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
Do you take PITY on Binky??I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit >>>>>>>>>>> of theI think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English >>>>>>>>>>>>> language."I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P >>>>>>>>>>>
doubt.
And YOU, Binky, know this because .............>vvvvv<-Paedophile talker notedvvvvv<-Paedophile talker notedLooks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and
actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P >>>>>>>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky??>^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
purgery,
intimidation,
...
I'd like to know what pugrey is.
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 5/3/2025 08:58, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,And YOU, Binky, know this because .............
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
pugrey,
intimidation,
...
I'd like to know what pugrey is.
Well, whatever it is... apparently it's a crime. So don't be
doing it!
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 5/3/2025 08:58, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,And YOU, Binky, know this because .............
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
pugrey,
intimidation,
...
I'd like to know what pugrey is.
Well, whatever it is... apparently it's a crime. So don't be
doing it!
In article <CcqRP.164961$BFJ.111962@fx13.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 5/3/2025 08:58, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70Â <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv2b0h$11cl4$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70Â <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70Â <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
                         ÂDo you take PITY on Binky??I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit >>>>>>>>>>>> of theI think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English >>>>>>>>>>>>>> language."I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P >>>>>>>>>>>>
doubt.
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedvvvvv<-Paedophile talker notedLooks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and >>>>>>>>>> actually take responsibility for his life and his actions.
I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P >>>>>>>>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky?? >>>>>> Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted                              Â
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
And YOU, *BINKY* , know this because .............??O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??       ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
purgery,
intimidation,
...
I'd like to know what pugrey is.
On 4/05/2025 1:20 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Hornplayer9599 wrote:Does that come under "Ignorance (of the law) is NO excuse"?? ;-P
On 5/3/2025 08:58, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,And YOU, Binky, know this because .............
Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
pugrey,
intimidation,
...
I'd like to know what pugrey is.
Well, whatever it is... apparently it's a crime. So don't be
doing it!
--
Daniel70
On 4/05/2025 7:16 am, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <CcqRP.164961$BFJ.111962@fx13.ams4>,
Hornplayer9599 <Hornplayer9599@aol.com> wrote:
On 5/3/2025 08:58, Daniel70 wrote:
On 3/05/2025 10:47 pm, The Doctor wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
In article <vv4qqu$3alfl$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70Â <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 11:33 pm, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vv2b0h$11cl4$1@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70Â <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 2/05/2025 5:58 am, The Doctor wrote:
In article <vuvsec$2o75i$3@dont-email.me>,
Daniel70Â <daniel47@eternal-september.org> wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:41 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-05-01 5:08 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/04/2025 10:57 pm, Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-04-30 4:36 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:
On 28/04/2025 11:03 pm, Idlehands wrote:
<Snip>
                         ÂDo you take PITY on Binky??I do but for some unknown reason I try to give him the benefit >>>>>>>>>>>>> of theI think that binky has a very poor grasp of the English >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> language."I think ..."?? COME ON, Idlehands!! Surely YOU *KNOW* !! ;-P >>>>>>>>>>>>>
doubt.
^^^^^<-Paedophile talker notedvvvvv<-Paedophile talker notedLooks like Idlehands is on the run from the law.I'm betting .......... Not whilst Mummy and Daddy are around. ;-P >>>>>>>>>
It's more of a naive hope that one day he will grow the and >>>>>>>>>>> actually take responsibility for his life and his actions. >>>>>>>>>>
Oh!! And how do YOU know this, Binky?? And for WHAT Crime, Binky?? >>>>>>> >Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â
vvvvv<-Paedophile talker noted                              Â
Crimes not crime, Dannyboy!
And YOU, *BINKY* , know this because .............??O.K., Binky, for WHAT Crimes, Binky??       ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Lying witness,
Falsifying evidence,
purgery,
intimidation,
...
I'd like to know what pugrey is.
Oh, come on, Binky, do I have to highlight my 'Binky''s for YOU now, Binky??^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted ^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
Still awaiting an answer to my actual question, Binky!!^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted >--
Daniel70
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 42:02:38 |
| Calls: | 10,392 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,214 |