The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E09 have come in >including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux is the lowest
rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who began in 1963.
At 3.00 million this figure beats the 3.1 million viewers obtained by
episode 1 of Battlefield back in 1989 when the series was cancelled.
The episode only added 1.42 million viewers over 7 days and streaming to
the dismal record breaking 1.58 viewers that watched it overnight.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/uk-doctor-who-ratings-2025-103940.htm
Let's hope this brings about the immediate cancellation of the perverted >sexually harassing bully Doctor Whoke, played by Ncuti Gatwa, the
current incarnation of the genocidal Timeless Child monster.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E09 have come in including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux is the lowest
rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who began in 1963.
Let's hope this brings about the immediate cancellation of the
perverted sexually harassing bully Doctor Whoke, played by
Ncuti Gatwa, the current incarnation of the genocidal Timeless
Child monster.
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02 have
come in including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux
is the lowest rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who
began in 1963.
The episode only added 1.42 million viewers over 7 days and
streaming to the dismal record breaking 1.58 viewers that
watched it overnight.
On 1/05/2025 10:30 am, The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E09 have come in
including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux is the lowest
rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who began in 1963.
"S02E09"?? Did we all miss about a half dozen episodes??
The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02 have
come in including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux
is the lowest rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who
began in 1963.
Two completely different stories from two completely different
eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples and oranges.
I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is clearly
on a downward trend among viewers.
The episode only added 1.42 million viewers over 7 days and
streaming to the dismal record breaking 1.58 viewers that
watched it overnight.
This stat alone shows why the overnights are no longer of any
importance and the consolidated seven figure is more indicative.
Nearly as many people watched the episode over seven days streamed/time-shifted (1.42m) as they did on broadcast (1.58m).No one but around 100,000 to 300,000 people watched the episode on
On 1/05/2025 10:30 am, The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E09 have come in
including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux is the lowest
rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who began in 1963.
"S02E09"?? Did we all miss about a half dozen episodes??
--
Daniel70
The True Doctor wrote:
Let's hope this brings about the immediate cancellation of the
perverted sexually harassing bully Doctor Whoke, played by
Ncuti Gatwa, the current incarnation of the genocidal Timeless
Child monster.
Do you only have one drum to bang?
There are other things out there to get worked up over than
ratings of a TV show... your obsession is warping your mind.
Relax.
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful of
biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel better
later on...
On 01/05/2025 14:13, Daniel70 wrote:
On 1/05/2025 10:30 am, The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E09 have come in
including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux is the lowest
rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who began in 1963.
"S02E09"?? Did we all miss about a half dozen episodes??
The 2 for some reason jumped to the other side of my keyboard.
S02E02
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02 have
come in including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux
is the lowest rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who
began in 1963.
Two completely different stories from two completely different
eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples and oranges.
I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is clearly
on a downward trend among viewers.
The episode only added 1.42 million viewers over 7 days and
streaming to the dismal record breaking 1.58 viewers that
watched it overnight.
This stat alone shows why the overnights are no longer of any
importance and the consolidated seven figure is more indicative.
Nearly as many people watched the episode over seven days >streamed/time-shifted (1.42m) as they did on broadcast (1.58m).
In article <xn0p5abrt190kyq000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02 have
come in including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux
is the lowest rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who
began in 1963.
Two completely different stories from two completely different
eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples and oranges.
I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is clearly
on a downward trend among viewers.
The episode only added 1.42 million viewers over 7 days and
streaming to the dismal record breaking 1.58 viewers that
watched it overnight.
This stat alone shows why the overnights are no longer of any
importance and the consolidated seven figure is more indicative.
Nearly as many people watched the episode over seven days
streamed/time-shifted (1.42m) as they did on broadcast (1.58m).
I wonder if IPTV applies?
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Do you only have one drum to bang?
There are other things out there to get worked up over than
ratings of a TV show... your obsession is warping your mind.
Relax.
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful of
biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel better
later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
On 01/05/2025 16:25, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02
have come in including streaming, and it can now be said
that Lux is the lowest rating episode of all time ever
since Doctor Who began in 1963.
Two completely different stories from two completely
different eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples
and oranges.
This isn't comparing the episodes. It's comparing the ratings.
I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is
clearly on a downward trend among viewers.
Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend. The
writing started to improve and the stories got better.
This is not the case for the incel pervert Ncuti Gatwa
where the writing has descended into sexual harassment
and debauchery because it's being written by a sick
degenerate pervert that no man wants to sleep with.
On 01/05/2025 21:02, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5abrt190kyq000@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02 have
come in including streaming, and it can now be said that Lux
is the lowest rating episode of all time ever since Doctor Who
began in 1963.
Two completely different stories from two completely different
eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples and oranges.
I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is clearly
on a downward trend among viewers.
The episode only added 1.42 million viewers over 7 days and
streaming to the dismal record breaking 1.58 viewers that
watched it overnight.
This stat alone shows why the overnights are no longer of any
importance and the consolidated seven figure is more indicative.
Nearly as many people watched the episode over seven days
streamed/time-shifted (1.42m) as they did on broadcast (1.58m).
I wonder if IPTV applies?
Why would the BBC count illegal viewing?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Do you only have one drum to bang?
There are other things out there to get worked up over than
ratings of a TV show... your obsession is warping your mind.
Relax.
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful of
biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel better
later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
From who?
I recommend to one of my friends that they have a cup of tea,
some biscuits and rest for a bit and I am inviting trouble upon
myself?
You are a weirdo...
Methinks you have no idea of what the term trouble means!
The True Doctor wrote:
On 01/05/2025 16:25, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02
have come in including streaming, and it can now be said
that Lux is the lowest rating episode of all time ever
since Doctor Who began in 1963.
Two completely different stories from two completely
different eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples
and oranges.
This isn't comparing the episodes. It's comparing the ratings.
Still apples and oranges... as the television environment - and
Doctor Who - was so much different back then. No Internet, no
streaming services, less TV channels, different story
lengths, less budget, worse FX, etc.
Personally I don't think "Lux" deserves to be the lowest rated
episode of Doctor Who ever... but it is what it is.
I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is
clearly on a downward trend among viewers.
Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend. The
writing started to improve and the stories got better.
In some ways that is true. The fact is though the general
television watching public had nothing but apathy for the show
back then... there was only four TV back channels then too,
so the show had limited competition for viewers. Doctor Who was
in decline... it could only end one way.
This is not the case for the incel pervert Ncuti Gatwa
where the writing has descended into sexual harassment
and debauchery because it's being written by a sick
degenerate pervert that no man wants to sleep with.
For me, the stories this season ARE getting better. Whether this
continues for the rest of the season is another matter though...
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Do you only have one drum to bang?
There are other things out there to get worked up over than
ratings of a TV show... your obsession is warping your mind.
Relax.
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful of
biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel better
later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
From who?
I recommend to one of my friends that they have a cup of tea,
some biscuits and rest for a bit and I am inviting trouble upon
myself?
You are a weirdo...
Methinks you have no idea of what the term trouble means!
In article <xn0p5alcg1m0b31003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 01/05/2025 16:25, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02
have come in including streaming, and it can now be said
that Lux is the lowest rating episode of all time ever
since Doctor Who began in 1963.
Two completely different stories from two completely
different eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples
and oranges.
This isn't comparing the episodes. It's comparing the ratings.
Still apples and oranges... as the television environment - and
Doctor Who - was so much different back then. No Internet, no
streaming services, less TV channels, different story
lengths, less budget, worse FX, etc.
Personally I don't think "Lux" deserves to be the lowest rated
episode of Doctor Who ever... but it is what it is.
I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is
clearly on a downward trend among viewers.
Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend. The
writing started to improve and the stories got better.
In some ways that is true. The fact is though the general
television watching public had nothing but apathy for the show
back then... there was only four TV back channels then too,
so the show had limited competition for viewers. Doctor Who was
in decline... it could only end one way.
You are so Anti-McCoy that you do not know what the real problem
was at the Time: Jonathan Powell!
This is not the case for the incel pervert Ncuti Gatwa
where the writing has descended into sexual harassment
and debauchery because it's being written by a sick
degenerate pervert that no man wants to sleep with.
For me, the stories this season ARE getting better. Whether this
continues for the rest of the season is another matter though...
On 02/05/2025 00:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5alcg1m0b31003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 01/05/2025 16:25, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
The final consolidated +4 ratings for Doctor Whoke S02E02
have come in including streaming, and it can now be said
that Lux is the lowest rating episode of all time ever
since Doctor Who began in 1963.
Two completely different stories from two completely
different eras of the show, so a bit like comparing apples
and oranges.
This isn't comparing the episodes. It's comparing the ratings.
Still apples and oranges... as the television environment - and
Doctor Who - was so much different back then. No Internet, no
streaming services, less TV channels, different story
lengths, less budget, worse FX, etc.
Personally I don't think "Lux" deserves to be the lowest rated
episode of Doctor Who ever... but it is what it is.
I didn't think either episode was THAT bad actually, but they
are episodes form eras of "Doctor Who" where the show is
clearly on a downward trend among viewers.
Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend. The
writing started to improve and the stories got better.
In some ways that is true. The fact is though the general
television watching public had nothing but apathy for the show
back then... there was only four TV back channels then too,
so the show had limited competition for viewers. Doctor Who was
in decline... it could only end one way.
You are so Anti-McCoy that you do not know what the real problem
was at the Time: Jonathan Powell!
The real problem was the JNT was a sex obsessed pervert who expected
personal favours from everyone working on the show.
This is not the case for the incel pervert Ncuti Gatwa
where the writing has descended into sexual harassment
and debauchery because it's being written by a sick
degenerate pervert that no man wants to sleep with.
For me, the stories this season ARE getting better. Whether this
continues for the rest of the season is another matter though...
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." -William Shatner
In article <xn0p5akrv1l6i4b001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful
of biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel
better later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
From who?
I recommend to one of my friends that they have a cup of tea,
some biscuits and rest for a bit and I am inviting trouble
upon myself?
You are a weirdo...
Methinks you have no idea of what the term trouble means!
AGA might flame you for your suggestions.
In article <xn0p5alcg1m0b31003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend. The
writing started to improve and the stories got better.
In some ways that is true. The fact is though the general
television watching public had nothing but apathy for the
show back in 1989... there was only four TV back channels
back then too, so the show had limited competition for
viewers. Doctor Who was in decline... it could only end
one way.
You are so Anti-McCoy that you do not know what the real
problem was at the Time: Jonathan Powell!
On 2025-05-01 3:05 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful
of biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel
better later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
From who?
I recommend to one of my friends that they have a cup of tea,
some biscuits and rest for a bit and I am inviting trouble
upon myself?
You are a weirdo...
Methinks you have no idea of what the term trouble means!
Binky loves to sit back and watch flame wars and such but is
too much of a coward to participate.
On 02/05/2025 00:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5alcg1m0b31003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend.
The writing started to improve and the stories got
better.
In some ways that is true. The fact is though the general
television watching public had nothing but apathy for the
show back in 1989... there was only four TV back channels
then too, so the show had limited competition for viewers.
Doctor Who was in decline... it could only end one way.
You are so Anti-McCoy that you do not know what the real
problem was at the Time: Jonathan Powell!
The real problem was the JNT was a sex obsessed pervert who
expected personal favours from everyone working on the show.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5akrv1l6i4b001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful
of biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel
better later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
From who?
I recommend to one of my friends that they have a cup of tea,
some biscuits and rest for a bit and I am inviting trouble
upon myself?
You are a weirdo...
Methinks you have no idea of what the term trouble means!
AGA might flame you for your suggestions.
Might he? Why do you see the need to speak for him though?
Maybe AGA likes to lay down and rest after a hard day's ranting?
All that getting worked up over "Doctor Who" must affect his
blood pressure to some degree. So a nice cup of tea and a good
rest is the best way to unwind... ready to go again tomorrow
afternoon after he's seen "Lucky Day"!
Idlehands wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
On 2025-05-01 3:05 p.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful
of biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel
better later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
From who?
I recommend to one of my friends that they have a cup of tea,
some biscuits and rest for a bit and I am inviting trouble
upon myself?
You are a weirdo...
Methinks you have no idea of what the term trouble means!
Binky loves to sit back and watch flame wars and such but is
too much of a coward to participate.
There hasn't been a good flame war here in decades...
However, if recommending somebody sits down and has a cup of tea
is the fuel to start a flame war on RADW in 2025 then we have
really sunk to a new level of sad. We might as well just give up
and go and start collecting train numbers.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 02/05/2025 00:44, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5alcg1m0b31003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend.
The writing started to improve and the stories got
better.
In some ways that is true. The fact is though the general
television watching public had nothing but apathy for the
show back in 1989... there was only four TV back channels
then too, so the show had limited competition for viewers.
Doctor Who was in decline... it could only end one way.
You are so Anti-McCoy that you do not know what the real
problem was at the Time: Jonathan Powell!
The real problem was the JNT was a sex obsessed pervert who
expected personal favours from everyone working on the show.
On this one you just might be correct! ;-)
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5alcg1m0b31003@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Actually Sylvester McCoy's era was on an upward trend. The
writing started to improve and the stories got better.
In some ways that is true. The fact is though the general
television watching public had nothing but apathy for the
show back in 1989... there was only four TV back channels
back then too, so the show had limited competition for
viewers. Doctor Who was in decline... it could only end
one way.
You are so Anti-McCoy that you do not know what the real
problem was at the Time: Jonathan Powell!
No Dave, the real problem was that very few people were watching
it! If "Doctor Who" had been getting record breaking viewer
numbers, great AI figures, and the stories were being critically
acclaimed by all and sundry, the BBC wouldn't have cancelled it.
JNT had turned "Doctor Who" in to a pantomime and the show was
dying on its feet, which is why some people see similarities
with today's version of the show.
After saying that, I didn't think "Battlefield" deserved to be
the lowest rated episode of the classic era, just as I don't
think "Lux" deserves to be the lowest rated episode now.
In article <xn0p5bo6i2lh23v001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
You are so Anti-McCoy that you do not know what the real
problem was at the Time: Jonathan Powell!
No Dave, the real problem was that very few people were
watching it! If "Doctor Who" had been getting record
breaking viewer numbers, great AI figures, and the stories
were being critically acclaimed by all and sundry, the BBC
wouldn't have cancelled it. JNT had turned "Doctor Who" in
to a pantomime and the show was dying on its feet, which is
why some people see similarities with today's version of the
show.
After saying that, I didn't think "Battlefield" deserved to
be the lowest rated episode of the classic era, just as I
don't think "Lux" deserves to be the lowest rated episode
now.
Season 26 rocked!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5bo6i2lh23v001@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
You are so Anti-McCoy that you do not know what the real
problem was at the Time: Jonathan Powell!
No Dave, the real problem was that very few people were
watching it! If "Doctor Who" had been getting record
breaking viewer numbers, great AI figures, and the stories
were being critically acclaimed by all and sundry, the BBC
wouldn't have cancelled it. JNT had turned "Doctor Who" in
to a pantomime and the show was dying on its feet, which is
why some people see similarities with today's version of the
show.
After saying that, I didn't think "Battlefield" deserved to
be the lowest rated episode of the classic era, just as I
don't think "Lux" deserves to be the lowest rated episode
now.
Season 26 rocked!
Only for people who hadn't seen any better eras of Doctor Who!
You know, from when the show was actually good and Jon
Pertwee/Tom Baker were the Doctor in exciting adventures in time
and space... stories that people actually wanted to watch!
I doubt very few longtime Doctor Who fans would have a Season 26
story in their top ten list of classic "Doctor Who" episodes.
It might have been a marginal improvement over Season 25 though,
I'll give you that!
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5akrv1l6i4b001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful
of biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel
better later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
From who?
I recommend to one of my friends that they have a cup of tea,
some biscuits and rest for a bit and I am inviting trouble
upon myself?
You are a weirdo...
Methinks you have no idea of what the term trouble means!
AGA might flame you for your suggestions.
Might he? Why do you see the need to speak for him though?
Maybe AGA likes to lay down and rest after a hard day's ranting?
On 3/05/2025 12:02 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5akrv1l6i4b001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p5a9ua16d3u7004@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Doctor Blueshirt recommends a nice cup of tea, a handful
of biscuits and a lay-down in a dark room. You will feel
better later on...
You just invited trouble upon yourself.
From who?
I recommend to one of my friends that they have a cup of tea,
some biscuits and rest for a bit and I am inviting trouble
upon myself?
You are a weirdo...
Methinks you have no idea of what the term trouble means!
AGA might flame you for your suggestions.
Might he? Why do you see the need to speak for him though?
Maybe AGA likes to lay down and rest after a hard day's ranting?
Bloody Glasses (reading NOT Drinking!!)
First time I read that, it read "a hard *gay's* ranting"!!
--
Daniel70
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 02:56:18 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,755 |