• AI Acssessment of the Current Doctor Who Situation

    From The Doctor@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jul 7 14:42:55 2025
    XPost: uk.media.tv.sf.drwho, rec.arts.sf.tv, rec.arts.tv
    XPost: can.arts.sf

    AI review the Fan disstatifaction with Doctor Who 2023 to current

    Google Gemini

    Fan dissatisfaction with Russell T. Davies's (RTD) return
    to Doctor Who in the 2023-2025 period appears to stem from
    several key areas, as indicated by recent online discussions and reviews:

    Creative Direction and Tone:

    "Campy" and "Family-Friendly" Focus: Some fans express
    disappointment that RTD's current era leans too heavily
    into a "fun, campy, and family-friendly" style, believing
    it has lost the "heavy plots" and "horror" elements that
    previous seasons (including his own first run and those
    of Moffat and Capaldi) balanced. Critics argue that
    the show now feels "too safe and prescriptively wholesome"
    and that the Doctor sometimes behaves "like a human
    who woke up with superpower and can't wait to see
    if he knows how to use it."

    "End of the Universe" Stakes vs. "Monster of the Week":
    There's a desire for more self-contained, character-driven
    "monster of the week" episodes and less of the "never ending
    end of the Universe crap" or "visual spectacle" that some
    feel only appeals to young children.

    Musical Elements: The inclusion of musical interludes,
    particularly in "The Devil's Chord," has been a point
    of contention for some, who found
    it "self-indulgent and unnecessary."

    Storytelling and Narrative Choices:

    "Timeless Child" Arc: Despite significant backlash
    to the "Timeless Child" storyline from the previous
    showrunner (Chris Chibnall), RTD not only kept
    it but reportedly "doubled down on it"
    in the 60th Anniversary Specials
    and "The Church on Ruby Road." This has
    alienated some long-time fans who wished
    for a clean break from that controversial retcon.

    Lack of Setup to Payoff: Some critics argue
    that the finales in RTD's second era lack
    sufficient setup for their payoffs, feeling
    "wishy-washy" or "self-indulgent."

    Underdeveloped Characters: Characters
    like Rose Noble and Shirley Bingham have
    been criticised for not being fully developed
    or meaningfully integrated into the narrative,
    sometimes feeling like they "lack narrative purpose."

    "The Message" vs. Story: A recurring complaint
    is that the show has become "preachy"
    and "always has some message to tell,"
    with some fans feeling that it prioritises
    "agenda's" over compelling storytelling,
    similar to criticisms leveled
    at other Disney-backed franchises.

    Production and Episode Count:

    Fewer Episodes: Despite an increased
    budget from the Disney+ deal, the number
    of episodes per season has reportedly
    decreased (e.g., eight episodes compared
    to 10 or 13 in previous eras). This puts
    "undue pressure on each episode"
    and leaves fans feeling they don't
    get enough time with the new Doctor.

    Budget Allocation: Some question if
    the increased budget is being spent effectively,
    with reports suggesting much goes towards
    upscaling for 4K HDR, rather than producing
    more episodes or improving other aspects.
    Some visual effects choices have been perceived
    as "bad VFX" or "skill issues" in 4K.

    Audience Engagement and Ratings:

    Falling Viewing Figures: Despite RTD's
    stated goal of attracting younger audiences
    and his claim of "massively successful"
    engagement with the under-30 demographic,
    some reports suggest that viewing figures,
    even among this group, are declining,
    indicating the show "clearly isn't
    growing its audience."

    "Toxic Fandom": There's an acknowledgement
    within the fandom that a "vocal minority"
    or "toxic fandom" exists, where some
    fans "only find the negative"
    or "enjoy creating friction and arguments,"
    regardless of the showrunner. However,
    even some of the show's biggest fan
    sites have expressed significant disappointment.

    Perceived Lack of Adaptability:

    Some fans believe RTD is "pig headed
    and just doubling down" on creative decisions,
    not reflecting much on criticism, especially
    given his continuation of the Timeless Child arc.

    It's important to note that fan reactions
    are diverse, and many viewers still enjoy
    RTD's current run, defending its tone and themes.
    However, the points above represent common areas
    of dissatisfaction expressed by a segment
    of the Doctor Who fanbase during the 2023-2025 period.

    ChatGPT

    Alright - let’s unpack this carefully
    and honestly, because it's a big topic
    in the *Doctor Who* fan community right now.

    ---

    ## 📺 **Background**

    **Russell T Davies (RTD)** was
    the showrunner who *relaunched* *Doctor Who*
    in 2005 after its long hiatus. His era (2005–2010)
    is beloved by many: it’s seen as a golden age
    of *Doctor Who* with David Tennant
    and Christopher Eccleston, strong
    emotional storytelling, popular companions
    like Rose, Martha, and Donna, and huge mainstream
    success in the UK and worldwide.

    After a period with Steven Moffat
    and Chris Chibnall at the helm,
    RTD returned as showrunner
    for the 60th anniversary specials (2023)
    and Series 14/Season 1 (2024) starring
    Ncuti Gatwa as the Fifteenth {Real 14th} Doctor
    and Millie Gibson as companion Ruby Sunday.

    ---

    ## 📌 **Why some fans are dissatisfied (2023–2025)**

    Not *all* fans are unhappy - there's still
    huge goodwill for RTD. But here are the main
    points of *criticism* and frustration voiced
    in fan circles (Reddit, GallifreyBase, YouTube, social media):

    ---

    ### 1️⃣ **Tone and Style: Lighter, “Disneyfied” Fe