Verily, in article <1063gin$1i4j2$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 21:52, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063bfh$1hhr9$3@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There are NO Doctors before William Hartnell's first Doctor.
What about the Morbius Doctors?
*evil grin*
There are and never were any Morbius Doctors other than Hartnell,
Troughton, Pertwee, and Tom Baker. All the other faces are those of
Morbius as stated by the writer Terrance Dicks himself.
The show people do say that, but it's a later retcon. If you just watch
the episode, it's pretty clear that they're supposed to be prior
incarnations of the Doctor. "How old are you, Doctor? How old are you >*really*?"
The idea was presumably to introduce some real danger back into the
show. If you count the Morbius doctors, there are just enough of them to
make the guy we call Four the thirteenth incarnation.
They even remember it when Four regenerates to Five. It was "prepared
for" and the weird glowing Watcher has to take action, unlike all other >regenerations.
They have since retconned it, and it's probably just as well, but they >absolutely were intended as prior Doctors. They just didn't want to deal
with it on an ongoing basis.
--
The quick rise and drama-riddled fall of an almanac comment community.
It's like Mean Girls with Geritol and hearing aids.
https://www.reddit.com/r/internetdrama/comments/1lu9pb1/longform_the_qui >ck_rise_and_dramariddled_fall_of/
Verily, in article <1063gin$1i4j2$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 21:52, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063bfh$1hhr9$3@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There are NO Doctors before William Hartnell's first Doctor.
What about the Morbius Doctors?
*evil grin*
There are and never were any Morbius Doctors other than Hartnell,
Troughton, Pertwee, and Tom Baker. All the other faces are those of
Morbius as stated by the writer Terrance Dicks himself.
The show people do say that, but it's a later retcon. If you just watch
the episode, it's pretty clear that they're supposed to be prior
incarnations of the Doctor. "How old are you, Doctor? How old are you *really*?"
The idea was presumably to introduce some real danger back into the
show. If you count the Morbius doctors, there are just enough of them to
make the guy we call Four the thirteenth incarnation.
They even remember it when Four regenerates to Five. It was "prepared
for" and the weird glowing Watcher has to take action, unlike all other regenerations.
They have since retconned it, and it's probably just as well, but they absolutely were intended as prior Doctors. They just didn't want to dealThe claim of prior regenerations to Hartnell is itself a retcon. It is
with it on an ongoing basis.
On 26/07/2025 22:49, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063gin$1i4j2$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 21:52, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063bfh$1hhr9$3@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There are NO Doctors before William Hartnell's first Doctor.
What about the Morbius Doctors?
*evil grin*
There are and never were any Morbius Doctors other than Hartnell,
Troughton, Pertwee, and Tom Baker. All the other faces are those of
Morbius as stated by the writer Terrance Dicks himself.
The show people do say that, but it's a later retcon. If you just watch
the episode, it's pretty clear that they're supposed to be prior
incarnations of the Doctor. "How old are you, Doctor? How old are you
*really*?"
The idea was presumably to introduce some real danger back into the
show. If you count the Morbius doctors, there are just enough of them to
make the guy we call Four the thirteenth incarnation.
The 12 regeneration limit was not introduced until The Deadly Assassin
in the following season. Therefore there are no stakes involved for the >Doctor. The viewer knows the Doctor's previous faces. They know that
Morbius is showing he has had more incarnations than the Doctor, it's
already stated that he's far older, and is showing his previous
incarnations after the Doctor reaches his limit. Also the whole thing is >nonsensical since it's called a children's game. How can children show
off previous regenerations when they've not had any? The only
explanations is that the one who is winning is the one with his face on
the screen.
They even remember it when Four regenerates to Five. It was "prepared
for" and the weird glowing Watcher has to take action, unlike all other
regenerations.
The Watcher is an inter-regenerational projection. The Doctor doesn't
know how to do this until Planet of the Spiders.
The claim of prior regenerations to Hartnell is itself a retcon. It is
They have since retconned it, and it's probably just as well, but they
absolutely were intended as prior Doctors. They just didn't want to deal
with it on an ongoing basis.
clear from The Tenth Planet and Power of the Daleks that the Doctor has
never regenerated before he turns into Troughton and Troughton did not >regenerate in The War Games because the Time Lords decided to alter his >appearance instead. Even Pertwee into Tom Baker had to be prepared for
since Pertwee has no experience of regenerating other than Hartnell into >Troughton and once again Tom Baker has to prepare for regenerating into >Davison.
It's made clear in The Five Doctor's that Hartnell is the original >incarnation of the Doctor and even before that we know that Davison only
has 8 regenerations left in Mawdryn Undead.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <1063ml6$1j1a3$2@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 22:49, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063gin$1i4j2$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 21:52, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063bfh$1hhr9$3@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There are NO Doctors before William Hartnell's first Doctor.
What about the Morbius Doctors?
*evil grin*
There are and never were any Morbius Doctors other than Hartnell,
Troughton, Pertwee, and Tom Baker. All the other faces are those of
Morbius as stated by the writer Terrance Dicks himself.
The show people do say that, but it's a later retcon. If you just watch
the episode, it's pretty clear that they're supposed to be prior
incarnations of the Doctor. "How old are you, Doctor? How old are you
*really*?"
The idea was presumably to introduce some real danger back into the
show. If you count the Morbius doctors, there are just enough of them to >> > make the guy we call Four the thirteenth incarnation.
The 12 regeneration limit was not introduced until The Deadly Assassin
in the following season.
Producer Philip Hinchliffe stated that they were intended as prior
Doctors.
Wikipedia link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brain_of_Morbius
Faces in the mind-bending sequence
During the Doctor's mental battle with Morbius, the mind-bending machine >displays two images of Morbius, then images of the Doctor's four
incarnations as of the serial's production. These are followed by images
of eight previously unseen faces, intended to represent incarnations >preceding the First Doctor. The Doctor's previous faces are almost all >portrayed by members of the Doctor Who crew who worked on this serial or
the following serial, The Seeds of Doom: production unit manager George >Gallaccio, script editor Robert Holmes, production assistant Graeme
Harper, director Douglas Camfield, producer Philip Hinchcliffe,
production assistant Christopher Baker [fr] (who is the exception as he
has no credits on Doctor Who), writer Robert Banks Stewart, and director >Christopher Barry.[5][6] Hinchcliffe stated, "We tried to get famous
actors for the faces of the Doctor. But because no one would volunteer,
we had to use backroom boys. And it is true to say that I attempted to
imply that William Hartnell was not the first Doctor".[7]
5. Howe Stammers Walker (1992) p198
6. "The Brain of Morbius". BBC. Retrieved 3 September 2019.
7. Lance Parkin, A History of the Universe pg. 255
"How Stammers Walker is Howe, David J. & Walker, Steven James (2004).
The Television Companion: The Unofficial and Unauthorised Guide to
Doctor Who. Springer. ISBN 1-903889-52-9.
Again, though, I'm pretty okay with this having been retconned away.
It's nice that the show started with the first.
They even remember it when Four regenerates to Five. It was "prepared
for" and the weird glowing Watcher has to take action, unlike all other
regenerations.
The Watcher is an inter-regenerational projection. The Doctor doesn't
know how to do this until Planet of the Spiders.
Interesting theory. What do you see as his role?
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: Spearhead From Space [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/Fd6Znkme?event=1396482295044640778
Verily, in article <1063ml6$1j1a3$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 22:49, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063gin$1i4j2$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 21:52, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063bfh$1hhr9$3@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There are NO Doctors before William Hartnell's first Doctor.
What about the Morbius Doctors?
*evil grin*
There are and never were any Morbius Doctors other than Hartnell,
Troughton, Pertwee, and Tom Baker. All the other faces are those of
Morbius as stated by the writer Terrance Dicks himself.
The show people do say that, but it's a later retcon. If you just watch
the episode, it's pretty clear that they're supposed to be prior
incarnations of the Doctor. "How old are you, Doctor? How old are you
*really*?"
The idea was presumably to introduce some real danger back into the
show. If you count the Morbius doctors, there are just enough of them to >>> make the guy we call Four the thirteenth incarnation.
The 12 regeneration limit was not introduced until The Deadly Assassin
in the following season.
Producer Philip Hinchliffe stated that they were intended as prior
Doctors.
Wikipedia link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brain_of_Morbius
Faces in the mind-bending sequence
During the Doctor's mental battle with Morbius, the mind-bending machine displays two images of Morbius, then images of the Doctor's four
incarnations as of the serial's production. These are followed by images
of eight previously unseen faces, intended to represent incarnations preceding the First Doctor. The Doctor's previous faces are almost all portrayed by members of the Doctor Who crew who worked on this serial or
the following serial, The Seeds of Doom: production unit manager George Gallaccio, script editor Robert Holmes, production assistant Graeme
Harper, director Douglas Camfield, producer Philip Hinchcliffe,
production assistant Christopher Baker [fr] (who is the exception as he
has no credits on Doctor Who), writer Robert Banks Stewart, and director Christopher Barry.[5][6] Hinchcliffe stated, "We tried to get famous
actors for the faces of the Doctor. But because no one would volunteer,
we had to use backroom boys. And it is true to say that I attempted to
imply that William Hartnell was not the first Doctor".[7]
5. Howe Stammers Walker (1992) p198
6. "The Brain of Morbius". BBC. Retrieved 3 September 2019.
7. Lance Parkin, A History of the Universe pg. 255
"How Stammers Walker is Howe, David J. & Walker, Steven James (2004).
The Television Companion: The Unofficial and Unauthorised Guide to
Doctor Who. Springer. ISBN 1-903889-52-9.
Again, though, I'm pretty okay with this having been retconned away.
It's nice that the show started with the first.
They even remember it when Four regenerates to Five. It was "prepared
for" and the weird glowing Watcher has to take action, unlike all other
regenerations.
The Watcher is an inter-regenerational projection. The Doctor doesn't
know how to do this until Planet of the Spiders.
Interesting theory. What do you see as his role?
On 27/07/2025 00:27, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063ml6$1j1a3$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 22:49, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063gin$1i4j2$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 21:52, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063bfh$1hhr9$3@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
There are NO Doctors before William Hartnell's first Doctor.
What about the Morbius Doctors?
*evil grin*
There are and never were any Morbius Doctors other than Hartnell,
Troughton, Pertwee, and Tom Baker. All the other faces are those of
Morbius as stated by the writer Terrance Dicks himself.
The show people do say that, but it's a later retcon. If you just watch >>>> the episode, it's pretty clear that they're supposed to be prior
incarnations of the Doctor. "How old are you, Doctor? How old are you >>>> *really*?"
The idea was presumably to introduce some real danger back into the
show. If you count the Morbius doctors, there are just enough of them to >>>> make the guy we call Four the thirteenth incarnation.
The 12 regeneration limit was not introduced until The Deadly Assassin
in the following season.
Producer Philip Hinchliffe stated that they were intended as prior
Doctors.
He might have thought that but the writer was Terrance Dicks.
Wikipedia link
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Brain_of_Morbius
Faces in the mind-bending sequence
During the Doctor's mental battle with Morbius, the mind-bending machine
displays two images of Morbius, then images of the Doctor's four
incarnations as of the serial's production. These are followed by images
of eight previously unseen faces, intended to represent incarnations
preceding the First Doctor. The Doctor's previous faces are almost all
portrayed by members of the Doctor Who crew who worked on this serial or
the following serial, The Seeds of Doom: production unit manager George
Gallaccio, script editor Robert Holmes, production assistant Graeme
Harper, director Douglas Camfield, producer Philip Hinchcliffe,
production assistant Christopher Baker [fr] (who is the exception as he
has no credits on Doctor Who), writer Robert Banks Stewart, and director
Christopher Barry.[5][6] Hinchcliffe stated, "We tried to get famous
actors for the faces of the Doctor. But because no one would volunteer,
we had to use backroom boys. And it is true to say that I attempted to
imply that William Hartnell was not the first Doctor".[7]
5. Howe Stammers Walker (1992) p198
6. "The Brain of Morbius". BBC. Retrieved 3 September 2019.
7. Lance Parkin, A History of the Universe pg. 255
"How Stammers Walker is Howe, David J. & Walker, Steven James (2004).
The Television Companion: The Unofficial and Unauthorised Guide to
Doctor Who. Springer. ISBN 1-903889-52-9.
Again, though, I'm pretty okay with this having been retconned away.
It's nice that the show started with the first.
The retcon is the idea that there were ever any incarnations of the
Doctor before Hartnell.
In an Unearthly Child we know from the first episode that Hartnell fled
to Earth to hide, observe, and not get into trouble. He only started
getting into trouble after Susan's teachers stumbled into the TARDIS.
Given that Susan was 15 he can't have been away from Gallifrey for more
than 15 years, and it was established in The Name of the Doctor that
Susan was already 15 when they left. The Timeless Child monster
contradicts everything that came before it including the entirety of
Matt Smith's story arc.
They even remember it when Four regenerates to Five. It was "prepared
for" and the weird glowing Watcher has to take action, unlike all other >>>> regenerations.
The Watcher is an inter-regenerational projection. The Doctor doesn't
know how to do this until Planet of the Spiders.
Interesting theory. What do you see as his role?
It was already established in Logopolis that the Watcher was created by
the Doctor in order to pilot the TARDIS and keep Adric, Nyssa, and
Teegan safe while the universe was collapsing piece by piece and the
Doctor was with the Master in the Master's TARDIS and trying to send a
signal to fix the universe from the Bernard Lovell Telescope back on
Earth. Having seen the Watcher at the start of the story the Doctor
worked out that it was himself in an inter-regenerational state, knew he
was going to regenerate very soon and created a paradox.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <1063gin$1i4j2$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 21:52, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
What about the Morbius Doctors?
*evil grin*
There are and never were any Morbius Doctors other than
Hartnell, Troughton, Pertwee, and Tom Baker. All the other
faces are those of Morbius as stated by the writer Terrance
Dicks himself.
The show people do say that, but it's a later retcon. If you
just watch the episode, it's pretty clear that they're
supposed to be prior incarnations of the Doctor. "How old are
you, Doctor? How old are you really?"
The idea was presumably to introduce some real danger back
into the show. If you count the Morbius doctors, there are
just enough of them to make the guy we call Four the
thirteenth incarnation.
They even remember it when Four regenerates to Five. It was
"prepared for" and the weird glowing Watcher has to take
action, unlike all other regenerations.
They have since retconned it, and it's probably just as well,
but they absolutely were intended as prior Doctors. They just
didn't want to deal with it on an ongoing basis.
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1063gin$1i4j2$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
On 26/07/2025 21:52, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
What about the Morbius Doctors?
*evil grin*
There are and never were any Morbius Doctors other than
Hartnell, Troughton, Pertwee, and Tom Baker. All the other
faces are those of Morbius as stated by the writer Terrance
Dicks himself.
The show people do say that, but it's a later retcon. If you
just watch the episode, it's pretty clear that they're
supposed to be prior incarnations of the Doctor. "How old are
you, Doctor? How old are you really?"
Agamemnon knows that, but he's happy to go with the Target
novel version as his guiding light on the issue... which has
now become the accepted head-canon among most of fandom. It
probably makes more sense in the big scheme of things though.
Well, it did until Chris Chibanall came along...
The idea was presumably to introduce some real danger back
into the show. If you count the Morbius doctors, there are
just enough of them to make the guy we call Four the
thirteenth incarnation.
I was too young in 1976 to think things through that deeply,
but I thought "The Brain of Morbius" was a great story
regardless of who the faces were. It's a classic.
They even remember it when Four regenerates to Five. It was
"prepared for" and the weird glowing Watcher has to take
action, unlike all other regenerations.
They have since retconned it, and it's probably just as well,
but they absolutely were intended as prior Doctors. They just
didn't want to deal with it on an ongoing basis.
Yes, it was retconned... and "Doctor Who" fans, like
bible-bashers with the bible, choose which retcons count and
which retcons don't. As the show has overwritten many many
things since 1963, with some changes being better than others.
The "Morbius Doctors" retcon - getting rid of pre-Hartnell
incarnations - is fine, but the "Timeless Child" retcon - which
implies there are pre-Hartnell incarnations - isn't...
Producer Philip Hinchliffe stated that they were intended
as prior Doctors.
Verily, in article
<xn0p8sked18narw001@news.eternal-september.org>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The "Morbius Doctors" retcon - getting rid of pre-Hartnell
incarnations - is fine, but the "Timeless Child" retcon -
which implies there are pre-Hartnell incarnations - isn't...
Yeah, the Timeless Child thing sounds awful. I'll admit I
haven't seen it and am relying on reports, but it sounds
dumb enough that I prefer not having seen it.
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Producer Philip Hinchliffe stated that they were intended
as prior Doctors.
He should have had the guts to make his intentions a bit more
obvious in the actual script... he chickened out and left it
vague.
Verily, in article <xn0p8sked18narw001@news.eternal-september.org>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The "Morbius Doctors" retcon - getting rid of pre-Hartnell
incarnations - is fine, but the "Timeless Child" retcon - which
implies there are pre-Hartnell incarnations - isn't...
Yeah, the Timeless Child thing sounds awful. I'll admit I haven't seen
it and am relying on reports, but it sounds dumb enough that I prefer
not having seen it.
The Doctor isn't supposed to be the Chosen One and the rightful heir to
the throne and all that nonsense. He's at his best when he's a regular
guy who figures things out as he goes.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: Spearhead From Space [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/Fd6Znkme?event=1396482295044640778
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article
<xn0p8sked18narw001@news.eternal-september.org>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The "Morbius Doctors" retcon - getting rid of pre-Hartnell
incarnations - is fine, but the "Timeless Child" retcon -
which implies there are pre-Hartnell incarnations - isn't...
Yeah, the Timeless Child thing sounds awful. I'll admit I
haven't seen it and am relying on reports, but it sounds
dumb enough that I prefer not having seen it.
Being polite, misguided is the most positive thing I could say
about the idea.
Having a female 13th Doctor should have been enough of a
creative blank canvass for Chris Chibnall to play with... he
then decided to go down the lore-changing route and come up
with the idea of the "Timeless Child"... for me, a bad idea,
poorly realised.
Verily, in article <10647bl$1kkg7$1@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It was already established in Logopolis that the Watcher was created by
the Doctor in order to pilot the TARDIS and keep Adric, Nyssa, and
Teegan safe while the universe was collapsing piece by piece and the
Doctor was with the Master in the Master's TARDIS and trying to send a
signal to fix the universe from the Bernard Lovell Telescope back on
Earth. Having seen the Watcher at the start of the story the Doctor
worked out that it was himself in an inter-regenerational state, knew he
was going to regenerate very soon and created a paradox.
Where is this established? I've seen Logopolis multiple times and never >noticed any such scene.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: Spearhead From Space [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/Fd6Znkme?event=1396482295044640778
Verily, in article <10647bl$1kkg7$1@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It was already established in Logopolis that the Watcher was created by
the Doctor in order to pilot the TARDIS and keep Adric, Nyssa, and
Teegan safe while the universe was collapsing piece by piece and the
Doctor was with the Master in the Master's TARDIS and trying to send a
signal to fix the universe from the Bernard Lovell Telescope back on
Earth. Having seen the Watcher at the start of the story the Doctor
worked out that it was himself in an inter-regenerational state, knew he
was going to regenerate very soon and created a paradox.
Where is this established? I've seen Logopolis multiple times and never noticed any such scene.
On 27/07/2025 14:43, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <10647bl$1kkg7$1@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It was already established in Logopolis that the Watcher was created by
the Doctor in order to pilot the TARDIS and keep Adric, Nyssa, and
Teegan safe while the universe was collapsing piece by piece and the
Doctor was with the Master in the Master's TARDIS and trying to send a
signal to fix the universe from the Bernard Lovell Telescope back on
Earth. Having seen the Watcher at the start of the story the Doctor
worked out that it was himself in an inter-regenerational state, knew he >>> was going to regenerate very soon and created a paradox.
Where is this established? I've seen Logopolis multiple times and never
noticed any such scene.
Towards the end of episode 1 and in the last third of episode 4. Why
else would Tom Baker tell Adric, Nyssa, and Teegen to go with the
Watcher and he will keep them safe?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The "Morbius Doctors" retcon - getting rid of pre-Hartnell
incarnations - is fine, but the "Timeless Child" retcon - which
implies there are pre-Hartnell incarnations - isn't...
I like the idea of pre-Hartnell Doctors in theory. It’s fun
to learn that there’s more you don’t know yet.
But in practice the Timeless Child was very badly done.
The idea of making the Doctor a sort of magical Moses
figure (abandoned child becomes a prominent figure
in
the civilisation that adopted him, then flees that culture
to wander elsewhere) is just plain wrong!
There were so many better ways to do pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Why did Chibnall have to choose this one?
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The "Morbius Doctors" retcon - getting rid of pre-Hartnell
incarnations - is fine, but the "Timeless Child" retcon - which
implies there are pre-Hartnell incarnations - isn't...
I like the idea of pre-Hartnell Doctors in theory. It’s fun
to learn that there’s more you don’t know yet.
But in practice the Timeless Child was very badly done.
The idea of making the Doctor a sort of magical Moses
figure (abandoned child becomes a prominent figure
in
the civilisation that adopted him, then flees that culture
to wander elsewhere) is just plain wrong!
There were so many better ways to do pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Why did Chibnall have to choose this one?
--
solar penguin
On 28/07/2025 09:10, solar penguin wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The "Morbius Doctors" retcon - getting rid of pre-Hartnell
incarnations - is fine, but the "Timeless Child" retcon - which
implies there are pre-Hartnell incarnations - isn't...
I like the idea of pre-Hartnell Doctors in theory. It’s fun
to learn that there’s more you don’t know yet.
But in practice the Timeless Child was very badly done.
The idea of making the Doctor a sort of magical Moses
figure (abandoned child becomes a prominent figure
in
the civilisation that adopted him, then flees that culture
...after murdering many people, mostly in cold blood...
to wander elsewhere) is just plain wrong!Because he's a woke moron.
There were so many better ways to do pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Why did Chibnall have to choose this one?
Having incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell completely destroys
the audience's connection with the character. The story of the Doctor
starts with Hartnell and Hartnell alone. We have a special name for
those who came before Hartnell. They are called parents, grandparents,
and ancestors. No one needs anything more than that.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/07/2025 09:10, solar penguin wrote:
I like the idea of pre-Hartnell Doctors in theory. It’s fun
to learn that there’s more you don’t know yet.
But in practice the Timeless Child was very badly done.
The idea of making the Doctor a sort of magical Moses
figure (abandoned child becomes a prominent figure
in
the civilisation that adopted him, then flees that culture
...after murdering many people, mostly in cold blood...
to wander elsewhere) is just plain wrong!Because he's a woke moron.
There were so many better ways to do pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Why did Chibnall have to choose this one?
I had no idea that plagiarising Exodus was a sign of wokeness.
(I guess plagiarising Leviticus must be the sign of anti-wokeness
or something.)
Having incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell completely destroys
the audience's connection with the character.
Does it? My DW experience started with Tom Baker. (The first
story I ever saw was ‘Masque of Mandragora’.) Learning there
were other Doctors before him I hadn’t seen didn’t completely
destroy my connection with the character. It just made me
want to learn more and see them.
The trouble with the Timeless Child is that Moses-lite isn’t a
character I want to learn more about. It just doesn’t feel right
for the Doctor.
The True loon lectured:
On 28/07/2025 09:10, solar penguin wrote:
I like the idea of pre-Hartnell Doctors in theory. It’s fun
to learn that there’s more you don’t know yet.
But in practice the Timeless Child was very badly done.
The idea of making the Doctor a sort of magical Moses
figure (abandoned child becomes a prominent figure
in
the civilisation that adopted him, then flees that culture
...after murdering many people, mostly in cold blood...
to wander elsewhere) is just plain wrong!Because he's a woke moron.
There were so many better ways to do pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Why did Chibnall have to choose this one?
I had no idea that plagiarising Exodus was a sign of wokeness.
(I guess plagiarising Leviticus must be the sign of anti-wokeness
or something.)
Having incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell completely destroys
the audience's connection with the character.
Does it? My DW experience started with Tom Baker. (The first
story I ever saw was ‘Masque of Mandragora’.) Learning there
were other Doctors before him I hadn’t seen didn’t completely
destroy my connection with the character. It just made me
want to learn more and see them.
The trouble with the Timeless Child is that Moses-lite isn’t a
character I want to learn more about. It just doesn’t feel right
for the Doctor.
--
solar penguin
On 28/07/2025 18:12, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/07/2025 09:10, solar penguin wrote:
I like the idea of pre-Hartnell Doctors in theory. It’s fun
to learn that there’s more you don’t know yet.
But in practice the Timeless Child was very badly done.
The idea of making the Doctor a sort of magical Moses
figure (abandoned child becomes a prominent figure
in
the civilisation that adopted him, then flees that culture
...after murdering many people, mostly in cold blood...
to wander elsewhere) is just plain wrong!Because he's a woke moron.
There were so many better ways to do pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Why did Chibnall have to choose this one?
I had no idea that plagiarising Exodus was a sign of wokeness.
Turning the Doctor into a bullying sexually harassing mass murdering >psychopath is the sign of wokeness that makes the writers woke morons,
not that part of it was plagiarised from Exodus.
(I guess plagiarising Leviticus must be the sign of anti-wokeness
or something.)
Having incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell completely destroys
the audience's connection with the character.
Does it? My DW experience started with Tom Baker. (The first
story I ever saw was ‘Masque of Mandragora’.) Learning there
were other Doctors before him I hadn’t seen didn’t completely
destroy my connection with the character. It just made me
want to learn more and see them.
There were only a finite number of Doctors before Tom Baker and I
already knew there were at no more than three that existed before Tom
Baker because I saw Pertwee regenerating into him in the first episode
of Robot and my mum had watched Hartnell as the first Doctor long before
that and told me about him changing his appearance. I could always go to
the library and read about all the first three Doctors whenever I wanted.
The trouble with the Timeless Child is that Moses-lite isn’t a
character I want to learn more about. It just doesn’t feel right
for the Doctor.
The trouble with the Timeless Child, apart from it being a monster, is
that there are an infinite number of incarnations of it before Hartnell
that no one knows about, so how can they connect with it or discover
anything about it to begin with?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True loon lectured:
On 28/07/2025 18:12, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/07/2025 09:10, solar penguin wrote:
Because he's a woke moron.
There were so many better ways to do pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Why did Chibnall have to choose this one?
I had no idea that plagiarising Exodus was a sign of wokeness.
Turning the Doctor into a bullying sexually harassing mass murdering
psychopath is the sign of wokeness that makes the writers woke morons,
not that part of it was plagiarised from Exodus.
Then I’ve got great news for you. The Timeless Child wasn’t a
bullying, sexually-harassing, mass-murdering psychopath.
So there’s nothing to worry about after all.
Having incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell completely destroys
the audience's connection with the character.
Does it? My DW experience started with Tom Baker. (The first
story I ever saw was ‘Masque of Mandragora’.) Learning there
were other Doctors before him I hadn’t seen didn’t completely
destroy my connection with the character. It just made me
want to learn more and see them.
There were only a finite number of Doctors before Tom Baker and I
already knew there were at no more than three that existed before Tom
Baker because I saw Pertwee regenerating into him in the first episode
of Robot and my mum had watched Hartnell as the first Doctor long before
that and told me about him changing his appearance.
You’re very lucky to have parents like that. I hope you appreciate them.
I could always go to
the library and read about all the first three Doctors whenever I wanted.
And now you’ll be able to buy these new novels and audios about
a pre-Hartnell Doctor. (Maybe even persuade your local library
to get them, assuming you still have a local library these days.)
There you go. Another problem solved.
The trouble with the Timeless Child is that Moses-lite isn’t a
character I want to learn more about. It just doesn’t feel right
for the Doctor.
The trouble with the Timeless Child, apart from it being a monster, is
that there are an infinite number of incarnations of it before Hartnell
that no one knows about,
As Zaphod Beeblebrox once said: “It’s big, but it’s not infinite.”
And anyway, if you’re worried about infinite incarnations, then
the bigger problem with the Timeless Child is that there can
be a potentially infinite number of incarnations *after* Hartnell.
Stories can only have forward momentum while they’re moving
towards a destination. In the Doctor’s case, the end of the current >regeneration cycle is the obvious one. Infinite regenerations stop
that, and the story just treads water without a new destination to
replace it.
so how can they connect with it or discover
anything about it to begin with?
These new audios and novels seem like a place to start.
--
solar penguin
solar penguin wrote:
The True loon lectured:
[Snip]
There were only a finite number of Doctors before Tom Baker
and I already knew there were at no more than three that
existed before Tom Baker because I saw Pertwee regenerating
into him in the first episode of Robot and my mum had
watched Hartnell as the first Doctor long before that and
told me about him changing his appearance.
I could always go to the library and read about all
the first three Doctors whenever I wanted.
And now you’ll be able to buy these new novels and audios
about a pre-Hartnell Doctor. (Maybe even persuade your
local library to get them, assuming you still have a
local library these days.)
There you go. Another problem solved.
Do libraries in the UK carry the Big Finish audios?
so how can they connect with it or discover
anything about it to begin with?
These new audios and novels seem like a place to start.
I'd say Hell would have to freeze over before Agamemnon does
that!!!
I might, might being the operative word, try out one of the
Fugitive Doctor audios from Big Finish... I didn't think much
of the trailer to the most recent one though (Dead or Alive)...
but never say never.
On 30/07/2025 18:35, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/07/2025 18:12, solar imbecile wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 28/07/2025 09:10, solar penguin wrote:
Because he's a woke moron.
There were so many better ways to do pre-Hartnell Doctors.
Why did Chibnall have to choose this one?
I had no idea that plagiarising Exodus was a sign of wokeness.
Turning the Doctor into a bullying sexually harassing mass murdering
psychopath is the sign of wokeness that makes the writers woke morons,
not that part of it was plagiarised from Exodus.
Then I’ve got great news for you. The Timeless Child wasn’t a
bullying, sexually-harassing, mass-murdering psychopath.
Yes it was. You can even see it in the way Ncuti Gatwa behaves in The
Well sexually harassing a man who refuses to accept his authority and >bullying and sexually harassing him even further when the man demands
that he stops his inappropriate behaviour. The you've got Whittaker
sexually harassing Stephen Fry among others and letting a pair of
genociders, a child molesting frog, and a gang of snuff movie addicts go
free despite the enormity of their crimes.
So there’s nothing to worry about after all.
Only if you're a totally derange woke retard with no understanding of >morality and appropriate behaviour towards others.
Having incarnations of the Doctor before Hartnell completely destroys >>>>> the audience's connection with the character.
Does it? My DW experience started with Tom Baker. (The first
story I ever saw was ‘Masque of Mandragora’.) Learning there
were other Doctors before him I hadn’t seen didn’t completely
destroy my connection with the character. It just made me
want to learn more and see them.
There were only a finite number of Doctors before Tom Baker and I
already knew there were at no more than three that existed before Tom
Baker because I saw Pertwee regenerating into him in the first episode
of Robot and my mum had watched Hartnell as the first Doctor long before >>> that and told me about him changing his appearance.
You’re very lucky to have parents like that. I hope you appreciate them. >>
I could always go toAnd now you’ll be able to buy these new novels and audios about
the library and read about all the first three Doctors whenever I wanted. >>
a pre-Hartnell Doctor. (Maybe even persuade your local library
I'm not reading degenerate woke fan fic. even if it's free let alone
buying it.
to get them, assuming you still have a local library these days.)
There you go. Another problem solved.
The problem is the existence of this degenerate woke trash and the
attempt to claim it as being canon.
The trouble with the Timeless Child is that Moses-lite isn’t a
character I want to learn more about. It just doesn’t feel right
for the Doctor.
The trouble with the Timeless Child, apart from it being a monster, is
that there are an infinite number of incarnations of it before Hartnell
that no one knows about,
As Zaphod Beeblebrox once said: “It’s big, but it’s not infinite.” >>
There's no specified limit the the number of incarnations of the
Timeless Child monster so the number is infinite.
And anyway, if you’re worried about infinite incarnations, then
the bigger problem with the Timeless Child is that there can
be a potentially infinite number of incarnations *after* Hartnell.
Which would contradict Mawdryn Undead and The Time of the Doctor.
Stories can only have forward momentum while they’re moving
towards a destination. In the Doctor’s case, the end of the current
regeneration cycle is the obvious one. Infinite regenerations stop
that, and the story just treads water without a new destination to
replace it.
If someone cut off the Timeless Child monster's head which part of what
was left would regenerate? Did the evil child murdering bitch try doing
that as a scientific test?
so how can they connect with it or discover
anything about it to begin with?
These new audios and novels seem like a place to start.
No they don't. They're not canon and they're going to be degenerate woke >garbage like everything is at Bib Finish now. These racist woke retards
have now even made the historical Macedonian Greek queen of Egypt
Cleopatra VII (Pippa Bennett-Warner) into a West Sub-Saharan African
woman on the cover of The Last Queen of the Nile. How much more racist
can you get than stealing other people's history and completely >misrepresenting it as someone else’s who looks nothing like them despite >historical documents, statues, paintings, and mosaics showing and
describing exactly what Cleopatra VII looked like and where she came
from? It's the height of racism according to the same degenerate, narrow >minded, self-centre, and mentally sick woke bigots that have done this.
Big Finish have now become a bunch of racist propagandists spreading >Afro-Centric lies and propaganda. When are they going to change the
cover so it shows Cleopatra as Macedonian Greek in appearance and olive >skinned, like this >https://www.worldhistory.org/uploads/images/17227.png?v=1685495644-1679905790 >instead of this >https://www.bigfinish.com/releases/v/doctor-who-the-fourth-doctor-adventures-series-14-the-last-queen-of-the-nile-2493
?
When are other people going to call these racists out?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
No they don't. They're not canon and they're going to be degenerate woke garbage like everything is at Bib Finish now. These racist woke retards
have now even made the historical Macedonian Greek queen of Egypt
Cleopatra VII (Pippa Bennett-Warner) into a West Sub-Saharan African
woman on the cover of The Last Queen of the Nile. How much more racist
can you get than stealing other people's history and completely misrepresenting it as someone else’s who looks nothing like them despite historical documents, statues, paintings, and mosaics showing and
describing exactly what Cleopatra VII looked like and where she came
from? It's the height of racism according to the same degenerate, narrow minded, self-centre, and mentally sick woke bigots that have done this.
On 31/07/2025 8:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
No they don't. They're not canon and they're going to be degenerate woke
garbage like everything is at Bib Finish now. These racist woke retards
have now even made the historical Macedonian Greek queen of Egypt
Cleopatra VII (Pippa Bennett-Warner) into a West Sub-Saharan African
woman on the cover of The Last Queen of the Nile. How much more racist
can you get than stealing other people's history and completely
misrepresenting it as someone else’s who looks nothing like them despite >> historical documents, statues, paintings, and mosaics showing and
describing exactly what Cleopatra VII looked like and where she came
from? It's the height of racism according to the same degenerate, narrow
minded, self-centre, and mentally sick woke bigots that have done this.
WOW!! Well there's my "Thing for the day" .... "Queen Cleopatra VII"
wasn't actually Egyptian!!
--
Daniel70
On 31/07/2025 8:57 am, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
No they don't. They're not canon and they're going to be degenerate
woke garbage like everything is at Bib Finish now. These racist woke
retards have now even made the historical Macedonian Greek queen of
Egypt Cleopatra VII (Pippa Bennett-Warner) into a West Sub-Saharan
African woman on the cover of The Last Queen of the Nile. How much more
racist can you get than stealing other people's history and completely
misrepresenting it as someone else’s who looks nothing like them
despite historical documents, statues, paintings, and mosaics showing
and describing exactly what Cleopatra VII looked like and where she
came from? It's the height of racism according to the same degenerate,
narrow minded, self-centre, and mentally sick woke bigots that have
done this.
WOW!! Well there's my "Thing for the day" .... "Queen Cleopatra VII"
wasn't actually Egyptian!!
Hollyweird does these idiotic gender and ethnicity swaps all
the time these days ... including stupidly gender-swapping
established characters like Doctor Who and the Master!
The new "Pride and Prejudice" currently being filmed has just
announced they have a "diverse cast". Gatwa is in a new stage
play in the role of Christopher Marlowe (friend of William
Shakespeare), which all paintings show as a white man.
Such idiocy is being done to simply appease a small number of
loud-mouthed blinkered "Politically Correct" morons and to
fulfil checkboxes on the quota system. X-(
It should be noted, that when the new Marvel character Black
Panther was recently announced as being by a white man
(tehnically the child of a black person and a white person) in
the comic books, there were numerous complaints from the
"Politically Correct" brigade ... but when a white male
character is replaced by a black person or a woman or a
disabled person, everyone is supposed to accept that as fine.
It's simply reverse-ism.
Your Name wrote:
Hollyweird does these idiotic gender and ethnicity swaps all
the time these days ... including stupidly gender-swapping
established characters like Doctor Who and the Master!
For me, I don't have an issue with fictional alien characters
like the Doctor/Master changing their gender when regenerating.
They are Time Lords from Gallifrey and the show has already
established that their whole body changes when regenerating...
Romana II even got to pick her own form (Destiny of the Daleks).
So it's not too much of a stretch in a sci-fi type show to say
an alien can also change their gender when their body
regenerates. The reason for doing it in Doctor Who might be
wrong, as in political correctness tick-boxing, but gender
swapping aliens are nothing new in sci-fi shows/films.
FWIW, I actually preferred Missy to Sacha Dhawan's Master!
The new "Pride and Prejudice" currently being filmed has just
announced they have a "diverse cast". Gatwa is in a new stage
play in the role of Christopher Marlowe (friend of William
Shakespeare), which all paintings show as a white man.
Such idiocy is being done to simply appease a small number of
loud-mouthed blinkered "Politically Correct" morons and to
fulfil checkboxes on the quota system. X-(
The BBC has this weird notion that every historical TV drama it
makes now has to have black/Asian families, as well as
mixed-race relationships, as standard. No matter when in the
past they are set! In one recent Agatha Christie adaptation they
had a Nigerian man get off a boat from Africa, get on a train to
a small English village and go around solving murders, mingling
with the local community, and kissing the [white] girlfriend of
the local squire type character. The vicar was a white man,
married to an Asian woman, they had a mixed-race daughter [brown
skinned] who was in a relationship with the local [white]
Doctor. If they had modernised the story and set it in 2023/2024
no problem, but in a rural English village from the 1950's?!
Nah, not one bit realistic.
And not very faithful to the book either!
It should be noted, that when the new Marvel character Black
Panther was recently announced as being by a white man
(tehnically the child of a black person and a white person) in
the comic books, there were numerous complaints from the
"Politically Correct" brigade ... but when a white male
character is replaced by a black person or a woman or a
disabled person, everyone is supposed to accept that as fine.
It's simply reverse-ism.
Only a twisted person would have the idea of making Black
Panther a white person...
I'd be as much against that as I would be a black Captain
America, a female Thor or a latino Spider-Man. It's nonsense!
On 6/08/2025 8:18 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
I may be a little bit annoying at times, but I’m not
crazy!
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is on the
crazy spectrum somewhere ... this is not a normal place
to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
Nothing better to do with my evening!!
On 05/08/2025 20:50, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/08/2025 13:59, Blueshirt wrote:
The Eleventh Doctor said [when talking about The Corsair]
"she was a bad girl"... so clearly he was talking about a
female character. Aggy is just being mischievous
Or a drag queen.
With a whip and furry handcuffs...
Sounds about right.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/drag-queens-being-loaded-into-police-cars-after-rally/ar-AA1JXNXT
as he can't accept that Time Lords changed their
gender whilst regenerating.
No they have not. There's not been a single example of it
which is canon.
YOUR idea of "Doctor Who" canon is yours to own. If that's
what really floats your boat we will leave you in peace...
until Billie Piper becomes the 16th Doctor and we do the
female regeneration thing all over again in 2026/2027 !!!
;-)
Billie Piper is not the Doctor. Doctor Who ended in 2017 and nothing
from Kill the Moon onwards can be considered to be canon. No one in
their right mind would continue with this abhorrent, degenerate, woke
fan fic.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Your Name wrote:
On 2025-08-04 17:09:43 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The True Doctor wrote:
Test tube babies are not born in test tubes. They are
inserted into the mother's womb and given birth to the
normal way.
Yes, and maybe they do something similar on Gallifrey? The
Doctor is an alien. "Doctor Who" is a sci-fi fantasy show.
It's not a documentary about life on Earth.
There are many other sci-fi shows and books where characters
have been "test tube" babies or clones, and have grown in
vats, not a womb. Sometimes such characters are "born" from
the vats as fully grown adults, rather than babies or kids.
It's all a red herring anyway as none of the Time Lords that
gender swapped in "Doctor Who" were pregnant... and the show has
never stated how Susan was conceived/born. All they have said is
she was the Doctor's granddaughter. Personally I'd rather the
show didn't go any further than that, as we all know how they do
things now so they'd only come up with some strange mumbo-jumbo
to explain it rather than keeping it simple.
The True Doctor wrote:
Doctor Who ended in 2017 and nothing from Kill the
Moon onwards can be considered to be canon.
Just like the sun rising in the morning I like familiarity
with my morning cup of tea...
No one in their right mind would continue with this
abhorrent, degenerate, woke fan fic.
But, if they don't continue with the show what are you going to
moan about for the rest of your days? An Indian Isaac Newton and
the Moon thing will get a bit tiresome after the 437th time of
reading about them... you will need something fresh to get your
teeth into.
The idiot insisted:
In article <106sq74$2o175$1@dont-email.me>,
solar penguin <solar.penguin@gmail.com> wrote:
And of course, I meant ‘The Angels Take Manhattan.’
I’m still so angry about it after all these years, that I couldn’t even >>> calm down enough to remember the name properly!
Sorry about that.
Most know you refer to the bowing out of Amy and Rory.
At least I’m not claiming the fact I didn’t enjoy the episode means >everything from that point on is no longer canon.
I may be a little bit annoying at times, but I’m not crazy!
--
solar penguin
solar penguin wrote:
At least I’m not claiming the fact I didn’t enjoy the episode
means everything from that point on is no longer canon.
I support the idea of head-canon so I am happy if people wish
to ignore stuff in a television show that they didn't like...
this is sensible.
It's saying that the show finished and then continuing to watch
- this show that has finished - that is not sensible.
I may be a little bit annoying at times, but I’m not crazy!
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is on the crazy
spectrum somewhere... this is not a normal place to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
On 6/08/2025 12:21 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/08/2025 14:36, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
Aliens is not an excuse for bad writing, nor is fiction.Sorry! WHAT?? And I thought you, Aggy, knew stuff about 'Doctor Who'!!
way a writer wants it to be, that's the way it will be...
You mean crap and unbelievable.
just like half-human, bigeneration... and the moon becoming
an egg!!!
None of which is canon.
It IS canon that Doctor Who is Half Human .... well, it was true up
until 'The Timeless Child' .... but, as Aggy believes 'The Timeless
Child' isn't 'Doctor Who', that must mean The Doctor is STILL
half-human, doesn't it??
--
Daniel70
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
At least I’m not claiming the fact I didn’t enjoy the episode
means everything from that point on is no longer canon.
I support the idea of head-canon so I am happy if people wish
to ignore stuff in a television show that they didn't like...
this is sensible.
It's saying that the show finished and then continuing to watch
- this show that has finished - that is not sensible.
I use head canon to add to the show, not remove whole eras.
For example, ‘Kill the Moon’ has a subplot about the Doctor manipulating >Clara to teach her the responsibilities that come with time travel. In my >head canon this gets expanded so the whole story took place in some
sort of holodeck the Doctor had set up in the TARDIS. Clara just never
found out about it.
In fact I was literally expecting that to be the plot twist at the
end of the episode. It fixes everything and helps tie the main story
more closely to the subplot. (It also explains why so many minor plot
points were copied from classic DW stories set on the moon. The
Doctor was literally copying them when he created the simulation!)
I still hate the episode as transmitted, but I love the version of it
I created in my head.
--
solar penguin
On 6/08/2025 7:32 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/08/2025 20:50, Blueshirt wrote:
<Snip>
So does that mean you, Aggy, will cease to drop by here soon??YOUR idea of "Doctor Who" canon is yours to own. If that's
what really floats your boat we will leave you in peace...
until Billie Piper becomes the 16th Doctor and we do the
female regeneration thing all over again in 2026/2027 !!!
;-)
Billie Piper is not the Doctor. Doctor Who ended in 2017 and nothing
from Kill the Moon onwards can be considered to be canon. No one in
their right mind would continue with this abhorrent, degenerate, woke
fan fic.
--
Daniel70
On 6/08/2025 12:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/08/2025 13:11, Daniel70 wrote:AH!! So 'IN YOUR MIND ........', Aggy.
On 5/08/2025 2:02 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 04/08/2025 16:46, The Doctor wrote:
In article <106qjf7$27pet$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 04/08/2025 14:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <106q9t0$25kv7$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
<Snip>
Time Lords do not change gender while regenerating.
Until the Corsair came up.
There is no mention of the Corsair actually regenerating or that the >>>>>> rumour about him was even true.
Check out the Doctor's Wife
From http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/32-4.htm
(The box flies inside and ends up hitting the Doctor on the chest.)
RORY: A box?
AMY: Doctor, what is it?
DOCTOR: I've got mail. Time Lord emergency messaging system. In an
emergency,
we'd wrap up thoughts in psychic containers
and send them through time and space. Anyway, there's a living
Time Lord still out there, and it's one of the good ones.
RORY: You said there weren't any other Time Lords left.
DOCTOR: There are no Time Lords left anywhere in the universe.
But the universe isn't where we're going. See that snake?
(The Ourobouros, the snake swallowing its own tail.)
DOCTOR: The mark of the Corsair. Fantastic bloke. He had that snake
as a tattoo in every regeneration. Didn't feel like himself unless
he had the tattoo. Or herself, a couple of times. Ooo, she was a bad girl.
(Things go Bang!)
That doesn't mean he regenerated into a woman. It implies he was a
drag queen.
Sorry!! Where does that Script Quotation mention anything about The
Corsair being Transvestite??
That was the impression I got when I watched The Doctor's Wife. The
Corsair was a crazy mentally unhinged transvestite.
--
Daniel70
On 6/08/2025 8:18 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
At least I’m not claiming the fact I didn’t enjoy the episode
means everything from that point on is no longer canon.
I support the idea of head-canon so I am happy if people wish
to ignore stuff in a television show that they didn't like...
this is sensible.
It's saying that the show finished and then continuing to watch
- this show that has finished - that is not sensible.
Hey, you know how some people have "Imaginary Friends" .... maybe Aggy
THINKS he's actually watching some other program!!
I may be a little bit annoying at times, but I’m not crazy!
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is on the crazy
spectrum somewhere
I resemble that fact .... I mean "I resent that fact!!". ;-P
... this is not a normal place to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
Nothing better to do with my evening!!
--
Daniel70
On 06/08/2025 11:55, Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/08/2025 12:34 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 05/08/2025 13:11, Daniel70 wrote:AH!! So 'IN YOUR MIND ........', Aggy.
On 5/08/2025 2:02 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 04/08/2025 16:46, The Doctor wrote:
In article <106qjf7$27pet$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 04/08/2025 14:47, The Doctor wrote:
In article <106q9t0$25kv7$1@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
<Snip>
Time Lords do not change gender while regenerating.
Until the Corsair came up.
There is no mention of the Corsair actually regenerating or that the >>>>>>> rumour about him was even true.
Check out the Doctor's Wife
From http://www.chakoteya.net/DoctorWho/32-4.htm
(The box flies inside and ends up hitting the Doctor on the chest.) >>>>>> RORY: A box?
AMY: Doctor, what is it?
DOCTOR: I've got mail. Time Lord emergency messaging system. In an >>>>>> emergency,
we'd wrap up thoughts in psychic containers
and send them through time and space. Anyway, there's a living
Time Lord still out there, and it's one of the good ones.
RORY: You said there weren't any other Time Lords left.
DOCTOR: There are no Time Lords left anywhere in the universe.
But the universe isn't where we're going. See that snake?
(The Ourobouros, the snake swallowing its own tail.)
DOCTOR: The mark of the Corsair. Fantastic bloke. He had that snake >>>>>> as a tattoo in every regeneration. Didn't feel like himself unless >>>>>> he had the tattoo. Or herself, a couple of times. Ooo, she was a
bad girl.
(Things go Bang!)
That doesn't mean he regenerated into a woman. It implies he was a
drag queen.
Sorry!! Where does that Script Quotation mention anything about The
Corsair being Transvestite??
That was the impression I got when I watched The Doctor's Wife. The
Corsair was a crazy mentally unhinged transvestite.
In the minds of the majority of sane rationally minded people.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 06/08/2025 11:18, Blueshirt wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
At least I’m not claiming the fact I didn’t enjoy the episode
means everything from that point on is no longer canon.
I support the idea of head-canon so I am happy if people wish
to ignore stuff in a television show that they didn't like...
this is sensible.
This is not about head canon. It's about reason and rationality. The
moon did not hatch into a giant space dragon which flew off with 90% of
its mass and laid an egg just like the old one to replace it. This
defies all sense, science, and observation. Why are the flags, buggies,
golf balls, clubs and laser reflectors the astronauts left on the moon
all still there in exactly the same places they were left?
Nothing from Kill the Moon onwards can be considered to be canon.
It's saying that the show finished and then continuing to watch
- this show that has finished - that is not sensible.
How can you continue to watch something that ended in 2017?
I may be a little bit annoying at times, but I’m not crazy!
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is on the crazy
spectrum somewhere... this is not a normal place to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
It's a normal places for Doctor Who fans to hang out. Except there isn't
any Doctor Who any more. There hasn't been since 2017!
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
solar penguin wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
At least I’m not claiming the fact I didn’t enjoy the
episode means everything from that point on is no
longer canon.
I support the idea of head-canon so I am happy if people
wish to ignore stuff in a television show that they didn't
like... this is sensible.
It's saying that the show finished and then continuing to
watch - this show that has finished - that is not sensible.
I use head canon to add to the show, not remove whole eras.
I use it to ignore the stupidity of some of the plots... so
some things don't count in my head and other things do. I'd
go dizzy trying to make everything from 1963 'fit', so head
canon solves that requirement and I can sleep easily in my bed
every night.
For example, ‘Kill the Moon’ has a subplot about the Doctor
manipulating Clara to teach her the responsibilities that come
with time travel. In my head canon this gets expanded so the
whole story took place in some sort of holodeck the Doctor had
set up in the TARDIS. Clara just never found out about it.
If only the TARDIS had a holodeck!!!
In fact I was literally expecting that to be the plot twist at
the end of the episode. It fixes everything and helps tie the
main story more closely to the subplot. (It also explains why
so many minor plot points were copied from classic DW stories
set on the moon. The Doctor was literally copying them when he
created the simulation!)
I still hate the episode as transmitted, but I love the
version of it I created in my head.
Head canon versions of Doctor Who stories are often better than
the real thing!
On 8/5/2025 06:58, Daniel70 wrote:
We did not see DoctorSly regenerate into DoctorPaul, did we??
We did in the US. He regenerated in the morgue, as the attendant on
duty was watching "Frankenstein".
--
Intelligence is no guarantee against being dead wrong.
--Carl Sagan
On 06/08/2025 11:50, the stupid penguin wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
At least I’m not claiming the fact I didn’t enjoy the episode
means everything from that point on is no longer canon.
I support the idea of head-canon so I am happy if people wish
to ignore stuff in a television show that they didn't like...
this is sensible.
It's saying that the show finished and then continuing to watch
- this show that has finished - that is not sensible.
I use head canon to add to the show, not remove whole eras.
For example, ‘Kill the Moon’ has a subplot about the Doctor manipulating >> Clara to teach her the responsibilities that come with time travel. In my
head canon this gets expanded so the whole story took place in some
sort of holodeck the Doctor had set up in the TARDIS. Clara just never
found out about it.
In fact I was literally expecting that to be the plot twist at the
end of the episode. It fixes everything and helps tie the main story
more closely to the subplot. (It also explains why so many minor plot
points were copied from classic DW stories set on the moon. The
Doctor was literally copying them when he created the simulation!)
I still hate the episode as transmitted, but I love the version of it
I created in my head.
It's a pity the degenerate woke writers didn't have the sense to come up
with the simulation idea. AI would have written a better story. Even if
it had not defied all science and logic, it's still morons in space
featuring a bunch of low IQ office workers piloting a space shuttle a
decade after the shuttle programme ended, and a stupid delinquent low >achieving school girl instead of the best off the best.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/08/2025 11:18, Blueshirt wrote:
I support the idea of head-canon so I am happy if people wish
to ignore stuff in a television show that they didn't like...
this is sensible.
This is not about head canon. It's about reason and
rationality.
From what I see there's often very little reason or
rationality around here...
The moon did not hatch into a giant space dragon which
flew off with 90% of its mass and laid an egg just like
the old one to replace it.
No it didn't, it's still up there in space.
What you watched was a television show. Nobody claimed it
actually happened or could happen.
This defies all sense, science, and observation. Why are
the flags, buggies, golf balls, clubs and laser reflectors
the astronauts left on the moon all still there in exactly
the same places they were left?
Because "Doctor Who" is a fictional TV show not a documentary.
Nothing from Kill the Moon onwards can be considered to be
canon.
In your head canon.
Hornplayer9599 wrote:
On 8/5/2025 06:58, Daniel70 wrote:
We did not see DoctorSly regenerate into DoctorPaul, did we??
We did in the US. He regenerated in the morgue, as
the attendant on duty was watching "Frankenstein".
Seems it wasn't just the morgue attendant that was not
paying attention... ;-)
In article <106vdmi$3b7f4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 06/08/2025 11:18, Blueshirt wrote:
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is
on the crazy spectrum somewhere... this is not a
normal place to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
It's a normal places for Doctor Who fans to hang out.
Except there isn't any Doctor Who any more. There
hasn't been since 2017!
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <106vdmi$3b7f4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 06/08/2025 11:18, Blueshirt wrote:
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is
on the crazy spectrum somewhere... this is not a
normal place to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
It's a normal places for Doctor Who fans to hang out.
Except there isn't any Doctor Who any more. There
hasn't been since 2017!
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
In article <xn0p9857d5jb32l000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
Stephen Wilson is an anti-DoctorWho TimelessChild troll!
Daniel70 wrote:
Nothing better to do with my evening!!
You're spending time on the wrong newsgroup...
alt.usage.english would be more up your street... it's very
educational... today I learnt that Goodbye comes from God be
with you...
From now on I'll just day cheerio to people when I am leaving.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9857d5jb32l000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
Stephen Wilson is an anti-DoctorWho TimelessChild troll!
Dave Yadallee is an anti-Timeless Child Doctor Who troll!
See, anyone can play that game!
So maybe you could show us some of that Christian spirit
you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Nothing better to do with my evening!!
You're spending time on the wrong newsgroup...
alt.usage.english would be more up your street... it's very
educational... today I learnt that Goodbye comes from God be
with you...
Actually, after that un-provoked attack on you earlier in one of
the e-s groups, stay here where you are among friends... we
might be a quirky bunch but we all love each other really.
[Six people start choking on their tea...]
From now on I'll just day cheerio to people when I am leaving.
day -> say, obviously.
Cheerio.
Verily, in article <106uidg$ubo$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <MPG.42fbe47bbf9b1f2a9897a6@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <106spl3$2ntfp$1@dont-email.me>, did
solar.penguin@gmail.com deliver unto us this message:
I think I mentioned this at the time, but for me ?Angels in Manhattan?
was ruined by having totally the wrong type of ancient Chinese vase.
All suspension of disbelief was lost and I was literally yelling at
the screen, ?There?s no way that?s Qin dynasty!?
You know, this is one area where an AI assistant would -- finally! -- be
useful for a even a good writer. With the right prompts and guidance, an
AI could fact-check a ton of things along these lines, leaving the human
writer free to worry about more important parts of the story.
How would you use AI to fix Angels take ManHattan?
Oh, that's a much bigger task than checking for the right kind of vase.
All the plot holes, the angels suddenly having the ability to look
directly at each other... that needs an actual rewrite.
Think I should try it? I'd use a multi-step process, using an AI chat to
plot a sensible episode -- has Weeping Angels, Rory and Amy leave, is
also a good adventure and makes sense -- then use more AI to write it. I >might keep some of the motifs but alter the implementations to hold
together better.
It would be bad compared to real, classic Doctor Who, though. I'm not
sure anyone would actually want to read it.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "The Ambassadors of Death" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1401613673331425291
Verily, in article <1070m5a$18r0$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
BTW just got my new certification today.
Congratulations!
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "The Ambassadors of Death" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1401613673331425291
The Doctor wrote:
In article <106vdmi$3b7f4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 06/08/2025 11:18, Blueshirt wrote:
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is
on the crazy spectrum somewhere... this is not a
normal place to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
It's a normal places for Doctor Who fans to hang out.
Except there isn't any Doctor Who any more. There
hasn't been since 2017!
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/08/2025 11:18, Blueshirt wrote:
I support the idea of head-canon so I am happy if people wish
to ignore stuff in a television show that they didn't like...
this is sensible.
This is not about head canon. It's about reason and
rationality.
From what I see there's often very little reason or
rationality around here...
The moon did not hatch into a giant space dragon which
flew off with 90% of its mass and laid an egg just like
the old one to replace it.
No it didn't, it's still up there in space.
What you watched was a television show. Nobody claimed it
actually happened or could happen.
This defies all sense, science, and observation. Why are
the flags, buggies, golf balls, clubs and laser reflectors
the astronauts left on the moon all still there in exactly
the same places they were left?
Because "Doctor Who" is a fictional TV show not a documentary.
Nothing from Kill the Moon onwards can be considered to be
canon.
In your head canon.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9857d5jb32l000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
Stephen Wilson is an anti-DoctorWho TimelessChild troll!
Dave Yadallee is an anti-Timeless Child Doctor Who troll!
See, anyone can play that game!
So maybe you could show us some of that Christian spirit
you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/08/2025 8:18 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
solar penguin wrote:
I may be a little bit annoying at times, but I’m not
crazy!
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is on the
crazy spectrum somewhere ... this is not a normal place
to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
Nothing better to do with my evening!!
You're spending time on the wrong newsgroup... alt.usage.english
would be more up your street... it's very educational... today I
learnt that Goodbye comes from God be with you...
From now on I'll just day cheerio to people when I am leaving.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <106vdmi$3b7f4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 06/08/2025 11:18, Blueshirt wrote:
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is
on the crazy spectrum somewhere... this is not a
normal place to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
It's a normal places for Doctor Who fans to hang out.
Except there isn't any Doctor Who any more. There
hasn't been since 2017!
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
On 06/08/2025 19:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9857d5jb32l000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
Stephen Wilson is an anti-DoctorWho TimelessChild troll!
Dave Yadallee is an anti-Timeless Child Doctor Who troll!
See, anyone can play that game!
So maybe you could show us some of that Christian spirit
you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're mixing Jesus up
with Superman.
On 2025-08-06 8:12 a.m., Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <106vdmi$3b7f4$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 06/08/2025 11:18, Blueshirt wrote:
Anyone who posts on RADW for any length of time is
on the crazy spectrum somewhere... this is not a
normal place to hang out.
I love it though! :-)
It's a normal places for Doctor Who fans to hang out.
Except there isn't any Doctor Who any more. There
hasn't been since 2017!
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
I don't believe anyone would "stalk" binky, his imagination runs wild sometimes along with his paranoia.
Verily, in article <1070m5a$18r0$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
BTW just got my new certification today.
Congratulations!--
On 6/08/2025 9:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Nothing better to do with my evening!!
You're spending time on the wrong newsgroup...
alt.usage.english would be more up your street... it's
very educational... today I learnt that Goodbye comes
from God be with you...
Gee!! Whiz!! Did you lead a sheltered childhood or something??
;-P
From now on I'll just day cheerio to people when I am
leaving.
.... and I've read your correction .... so wouldn't comment
on it!!
On 06/08/2025 19:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Stephen Wilson is an anti-DoctorWho TimelessChild
troll!
So maybe you could show us some of that Christian
spirit you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're mixing
Jesus up with Superman.
On 7/08/2025 8:56 am, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1070m5a$18r0$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
BTW just got my new certification today.
What "new certification", Binky?? That YOU, Binky, are sane, maybe!!
Congratulations!
Wilson is a vicious stalker. He demonstrates
that on my Facebook Pages.
He should be tossed off the platform.
The Doctor wrote:
Wilson is a vicious stalker. He demonstrates
that on my Facebook Pages.
He should be tossed off the platform.
You'd burn people who disagreed with you at the stake
if you had any power, wouldn't you?
The chances of you having a stalker are close to zero!
Whilst the chances of sensible people disagreeing with
your points of view are extremely high!
Daniel declared:
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/08/2025 19:39, Blueshirt wrote:SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else do you, Aggy,
So maybe you could show us some of that Christian spirit
you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're mixing Jesus up
with Superman.
think Christ's teaching are/were about??
For some fundamentalist denominations, Christianity isn’t about the teachings of Jesus. It’s only about believing in his resurrection. The things he just happened to say and do before that are all irrelevant.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/08/2025 19:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Stephen Wilson is an anti-DoctorWho TimelessChild
troll!
So maybe you could show us some of that Christian
spirit you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're mixing
Jesus up with Superman.
Do you not love your neighbour as you do yourself?
Actually, now I come to think about it... it's very
likely that you don't!!!
The Doctor wrote:
Wilson is a vicious stalker. He demonstrates
that on my Facebook Pages.
He should be tossed off the platform.
You'd burn people who disagreed with you at the stake
if you had any power, wouldn't you?
The chances of you having a stalker are close to zero!
Whilst the chances of sensible people disagreeing with
your points of view are extremely high!
Daniel demanded:
On 7/08/2025 8:56 am, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1070m5a$18r0$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
BTW just got my new certification today.
What "new certification", Binky?? That YOU, Binky, are sane, maybe!!
Don’t be silly. No-one would ever certify him sane.
On 2025-08-07 5:30 a.m., Daniel70 wrote:--
On 7/08/2025 8:56 am, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1070m5a$18r0$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
BTW just got my new certification today.
What "new certification", Binky?? That YOU, Binky, are sane, maybe!!
Congratulations!
Probably a diploma mill certification whose only requirement is to pay
their fee in exchange for a piece of worthless paper.
Oh!! One of them! Right!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 6/08/2025 9:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Nothing better to do with my evening!!
You're spending time on the wrong newsgroup...
alt.usage.english would be more up your street... it's
very educational... today I learnt that Goodbye comes
from God be with you...
Gee!! Whiz!! Did you lead a sheltered childhood or something??
;-P
We'll... I was actually being facetious...
From now on I'll just day cheerio to people when I am
leaving.
Just so I could do my Atheist joke!
.... and I've read your correction .... so wouldn't comment
on it!!
I only corrected it to stop you!!! :-)
On 7/08/2025 10:04 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Ah!! Well, purpose achieved .... sort of.
On 6/08/2025 9:40 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Nothing better to do with my evening!!
You're spending time on the wrong newsgroup...
alt.usage.english would be more up your street... it's
very educational... today I learnt that Goodbye comes
from God be with you...
Gee!! Whiz!! Did you lead a sheltered childhood or something??
;-P
We'll... I was actually being facetious...
From now on I'll just day cheerio to people when I am
leaving.
Just so I could do my Atheist joke!
.... and I've read your correction .... so wouldn't comment
on it!!
I only corrected it to stop you!!! :-)
--
Daniel70
On 7/08/2025 10:18 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel declared:So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead would be .........??
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/08/2025 19:39, Blueshirt wrote:SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else do you, Aggy, >>> think Christ's teaching are/were about??
So maybe you could show us some of that Christian spirit
you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're mixing Jesus up
with Superman.
For some fundamentalist denominations, Christianity isn’t about the
teachings of Jesus. It’s only about believing in his resurrection. The
things he just happened to say and do before that are all irrelevant.
--
Daniel70
On 8/08/2025 5:32 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Wilson is a vicious stalker. He demonstrates
that on my Facebook Pages.
He should be tossed off the platform.
You'd burn people who disagreed with you at the stake
if you had any power, wouldn't you?
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have thought that
if Binky didn;t like what someone was posting on HIS Facebook page, HE
could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
The chances of you having a stalker are close to zero!--
Whilst the chances of sensible people disagreeing with
your points of view are extremely high!
Daniel70
On 7/08/2025 11:19 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel demanded:Oh! Right! Sorry. ;-)
On 7/08/2025 8:56 am, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <1070m5a$18r0$6@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
BTW just got my new certification today.
What "new certification", Binky?? That YOU, Binky, are sane, maybe!!
Don’t be silly. No-one would ever certify him sane.
--
Daniel70
Daniel demanded:
On 7/08/2025 10:18 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel declared:
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead would be .........??SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else do you, Aggy, >>>> think Christ's teaching are/were about??
Christianity isn't about being nice to people.
For some fundamentalist denominations, Christianity isn’t about the
teachings of Jesus. It’s only about believing in his resurrection. The >>> things he just happened to say and do before that are all irrelevant.
To pay off our penalty for Original Sin.
No, it doesn’t make sense to me either. But apparently this
goes all the way back to Saint Paul himself, who believed in
the resurrection but never actually heard what the living Jesus
preached.
Full explanation here:
https://youtu.be/rmelkprM3w8
--
solar penguin
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/08/2025 19:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9857d5jb32l000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
Correct!!
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
Stephen Wilson is an anti-DoctorWho TimelessChild troll!
Dave Yadallee is an anti-Timeless Child Doctor Who troll!
See, anyone can play that game!
But some people are truthful, others are not!!
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??So maybe you could show us some of that Christian spirit
you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're mixing Jesus up
with Superman.
On 07/08/2025 12:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're
mixing Jesus up with Superman.
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
Separating people and families from each other and creating
strife between father and son, brother and brother, and
husband and wife. He explicitly stated this himself.
On 8/08/2025 5:32 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Wilson is a vicious stalker. He demonstrates
that on my Facebook Pages.
He should be tossed off the platform.
You'd burn people who disagreed with you at the stake
if you had any power, wouldn't you?
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have
thought that if Binky didn't like what someone was posting
on HIS Facebook page, HE could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
On 07/08/2025 12:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 06/08/2025 19:39, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9857d5jb32l000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
Stephen Wilson thinks the TimeLess Child is Doctor Who.
It's part of the show, so he's right.
Correct!!
That freak stalks me on Facebook.
DM him on FB and tell him to come 'home'! We miss his
pearls of wisdom.
Stephen Wilson is an anti-DoctorWho TimelessChild troll!
Dave Yadallee is an anti-Timeless Child Doctor Who troll!
See, anyone can play that game!
But some people are truthful, others are not!!
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else do you, Aggy,So maybe you could show us some of that Christian spirit
you're supposed to have and be nice to people...
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're mixing Jesus up
with Superman.
think Christ's teaching are/were about??
Separating people and families from each other and creating strife
between father and son, brother and brother, and husband and wife. He >explicitly stated this himself.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 10:18 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel declared:So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead would be
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
Christianity isn't about being nice to people.
You're mixing Jesus up with Superman.
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
For some fundamentalist denominations, Christianity isn’t
about the teachings of Jesus. It’s only about believing in
his resurrection. The things he just happened to say and do
before that are all irrelevant.
.........??
So we can eat chocolate eggs and Hot Cross buns every Spring?
I can't see any other reason why supposedly sensible people
would get over-excited about a dead Jew [allegedly] "rising
from the dead"...
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and was buried
at the end of the garden, came back from the dead and lived
again you wouldn't believe it... so why believe other
unsubstantiated claims that are just as wacky?
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 10:04 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:Well, seems as you are from one or the other parts of Ireland,
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're
mixing Jesus up with Superman.
Do you not love your neighbour as you do yourself?
Actually, now I come to think about it... it's very
likely that you don't!!!
it's possible that you, Blueshirt, might not like YOUR
neighbour, either.
You must have missed the memo that I am an Atheist. (Or just
forgotten!) I don't claim to love my neighbour or believe any
of those "teachings" that have been made-up by different people
over many years to keep the gullible in line and give them a
crutch to make their way through life until they rot and decay
in the ground with nothing afterwards...
But THIS NG is all about 'Doctor Who' so we will not get
into Political/Religious discussions here, will we??
That's strange, as you seem quite happy to chime in on other
occasions!
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti Gatwa as
the 15th Doctor?
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted >it’ll make his computer explode.
Daniel70 wrote:
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have
thought that if Binky didn't like what someone was posting
on HIS Facebook page, HE could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
I think you can block people alright. But not being on FB
either I don't know how effective it actually is.
Blocking sounds like a sort of killfile. Binky is probably afraid
--
solar penguin
The True Doctor wrote:
On 07/08/2025 12:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're
mixing Jesus up with Superman.
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
Separating people and families from each other and creating
strife between father and son, brother and brother, and
husband and wife. He explicitly stated this himself.
Most wars around the globe seem to have their origins in
some sort of organised religion, so I'd say you are right!
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have
thought that if Binky didn't like what someone was posting
on HIS Facebook page, HE could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
I think you can block people alright. But not being on FB
either I don't know how effective it actually is.
Blocking sounds like a sort of killfile. Binky is probably afraid
it’ll make his computer explode.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 10:18 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel declared:So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead would be
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
Christianity isn't about being nice to people.
You're mixing Jesus up with Superman.
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
For some fundamentalist denominations, Christianity isn’t
about the teachings of Jesus. It’s only about believing in
his resurrection. The things he just happened to say and do
before that are all irrelevant.
.........??
So we can eat chocolate eggs and Hot Cross buns every Spring?
I can't see any other reason why supposedly sensible people
would get over-excited about a dead Jew [allegedly] "rising
from the dead"...
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and was buried
at the end of the garden, came back from the dead and lived
again you wouldn't believe it... so why believe other
unsubstantiated claims that are just as wacky?
The True Doctor wrote:
On 07/08/2025 12:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're
mixing Jesus up with Superman.
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
Separating people and families from each other and creating
strife between father and son, brother and brother, and
husband and wife. He explicitly stated this himself.
Most wars around the globe seem to have their origins in
some sort of organised religion, so I'd say you are right!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 10:18 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel declared:So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead would be
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
Christianity isn't about being nice to people.
You're mixing Jesus up with Superman.
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
For some fundamentalist denominations, Christianity isn’t
about the teachings of Jesus. It’s only about believing in
his resurrection. The things he just happened to say and do
before that are all irrelevant.
.........??
So we can eat chocolate eggs and Hot Cross buns every Spring?
I can't see any other reason why supposedly sensible people
would get over-excited about a dead Jew [allegedly] "rising
from the dead"...
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and was buried
at the end of the garden, came back from the dead and lived
again you wouldn't believe it... so why believe other
unsubstantiated claims that are just as wacky?
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have
thought that if Binky didn't like what someone was posting
on HIS Facebook page, HE could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
I think you can block people alright. But not being on FB
either I don't know how effective it actually is.
Blocking sounds like a sort of killfile. Binky is probably afraid
it’ll make his computer explode.
On 2025-08-08 12:26 p.m., solar penguin wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have
thought that if Binky didn't like what someone was posting
on HIS Facebook page, HE could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
I think you can block people alright. But not being on FB
either I don't know how effective it actually is.
Blocking sounds like a sort of killfile. Binky is probably afraid
it’ll make his computer explode.
It might mean he would have one last "friend" and like his post count he doesn't care about quality, just quantity.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 10:04 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:Well, seems as you are from one or the other parts of Ireland,
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're
mixing Jesus up with Superman.
Do you not love your neighbour as you do yourself?
Actually, now I come to think about it... it's very
likely that you don't!!!
it's possible that you, Blueshirt, might not like YOUR
neighbour, either.
You must have missed the memo that I am an Atheist. (Or just
forgotten!) I don't claim to love my neighbour or believe any
of those "teachings" that have been made-up by different people
over many years to keep the gullible in line and give them a
crutch to make their way through life until they rot and decay
in the ground with nothing afterwards...
But THIS NG is all about 'Doctor Who' so we will not get
into Political/Religious discussions here, will we??
That's strange, as you seem quite happy to chime in on other
occasions!
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti Gatwa as
the 15th Doctor?
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:^^^^
Daniel70 wrote:Because HE IS *GOD* . He can do wondrous things!! ;-P
On 7/08/2025 10:18 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel declared:So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead would be
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
Christianity isn't about being nice to people.
You're mixing Jesus up with Superman.
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
For some fundamentalist denominations, Christianity isn’t
about the teachings of Jesus. It’s only about believing in
his resurrection. The things he just happened to say and do
before that are all irrelevant.
.........??
So we can eat chocolate eggs and Hot Cross buns every Spring?
I can't see any other reason why supposedly sensible people
would get over-excited about a dead Jew [allegedly] "rising
from the dead"...
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and was buried
at the end of the garden, came back from the dead and lived
again you wouldn't believe it... so why believe other
unsubstantiated claims that are just as wacky?
(and, OPPS!! Hit 'Return' too soon!!)
--
Daniel70
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 10:18 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel declared:So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead would be
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
Christianity isn't about being nice to people.
You're mixing Jesus up with Superman.
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
For some fundamentalist denominations, Christianity isn’t
about the teachings of Jesus. It’s only about believing in
his resurrection. The things he just happened to say and do
before that are all irrelevant.
.........??
So we can eat chocolate eggs and Hot Cross buns every Spring?
When's that?? First Tuesday in November, maybe .... even if November IS
the last month of Spring??
I can't see any other reason why supposedly sensible people
would get over-excited about a dead Jew [allegedly] "rising
from the dead"...
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and was buried
at the end of the garden, came back from the dead and lived
again you wouldn't believe it... so why believe other
unsubstantiated claims that are just as wacky?
--
Daniel70
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:"MY Religion is better than your religion!!"
On 07/08/2025 12:14, Daniel70 wrote:
On 7/08/2025 5:19 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
SORRY!! "Love one another as I have loved you!!" What else
Christianity isn't about being nice to people. You're
mixing Jesus up with Superman.
do you, Aggy, think Christ's teaching are/were about??
Separating people and families from each other and creating
strife between father and son, brother and brother, and
husband and wife. He explicitly stated this himself.
Most wars around the globe seem to have their origins in
some sort of organised religion, so I'd say you are right!
--
Daniel70
On 9/08/2025 10:29 am,Paedphile Idlehands wrote:
On 2025-08-08 12:26 p.m., solar penguin wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have
thought that if Binky didn't like what someone was posting
on HIS Facebook page, HE could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
I think you can block people alright. But not being on FB
either I don't know how effective it actually is.
Blocking sounds like a sort of killfile. Binky is probably afraid
it’ll make his computer explode.
It might mean he would have one last "friend" and like his post count he
doesn't care about quality, just quantity.
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead
would be .........??
So we can eat chocolate eggs and Hot Cross buns
every Spring?
When's that?? First Tuesday in November, maybe ....
even if November IS the last month of Spring??
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
either way, on me!! ;-P
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and
was buried at the end of the garden, came back from
the dead and lived again you wouldn't believe it...
so why believe other unsubstantiated claims that are
just as wacky?
Because HE IS GOD . He can do wondrous things!! ;-P
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead
would be .........??
So we can eat chocolate eggs and Hot Cross buns
every Spring?
When's that?? First Tuesday in November, maybe ....
even if November IS the last month of Spring??
Works for me... I reckon there should be a "let's eat chocolate"
festival in every month on the calendar.
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
Separating people and families from each other and
creating strife between father and son, brother and
brother, and husband and wife. He explicitly stated
this himself.
Most wars around the globe seem to have their origins in
some sort of organised religion, so I'd say you are right!
"MY Religion is better than your religion!!"
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Because HE IS GOD . He can do wondrous things!! ;-P
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and
was buried at the end of the garden, came back from
the dead and lived again you wouldn't believe it...
so why believe other unsubstantiated claims that are
just as wacky?
That often seems to be the way religious people explain
stuff away to us simple folk ... without explaining anything
at all!
Something good happens = God works in wondrous ways.
Something bad happens = God has his reasons.
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have
thought that if Binky didn't like what someone was posting
on HIS Facebook page, HE could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
I think you can block people alright. But not being on FB
either I don't know how effective it actually is.
Blocking sounds like a sort of killfile. Binky is probably
afraid it’ll make his computer explode.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
:-)
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
On 10/08/2025 8:44 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:WHAT?? Don't you like chocolate or something?? Only one festival per month??
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
So the purpose of Christ rising from the Dead
would be .........??
So we can eat chocolate eggs and Hot Cross buns
every Spring?
When's that?? First Tuesday in November, maybe ....
even if November IS the last month of Spring??
Works for me... I reckon there should be a "let's eat chocolate"
festival in every month on the calendar.
Oh!! Hang on. I suppose you could have a month long festival EVERY
month. ;-P
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Because HE IS GOD . He can do wondrous things!! ;-P
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and
was buried at the end of the garden, came back from
the dead and lived again you wouldn't believe it...
so why believe other unsubstantiated claims that are
just as wacky?
That often seems to be the way religious people explain
stuff away to us simple folk ... without explaining anything
at all!
Something good happens = God works in wondrous ways.
Something bad happens = God has his reasons.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
:-)
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:"MY Religion is better than your religion!!"
Separating people and families from each other and
creating strife between father and son, brother and
brother, and husband and wife. He explicitly stated
this himself.
Most wars around the globe seem to have their origins in
some sort of organised religion, so I'd say you are right!
Or, my version of our religion is better than your version
of our religion... for those religions - like Christianity -
that have different branches of the same faith!
On 10/08/2025 8:50 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:"Something BAD happens" == You've been a bad, bad boy!!
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Because HE IS GOD . He can do wondrous things!! ;-P
If I told you my dog that died a few years ago, and
was buried at the end of the garden, came back from
the dead and lived again you wouldn't believe it...
so why believe other unsubstantiated claims that are
just as wacky?
That often seems to be the way religious people explain
stuff away to us simple folk ... without explaining anything
at all!
Something good happens = God works in wondrous ways.
Something bad happens = God has his reasons.
--
Daniel70
In article <xn0p9dlv28lmsx6000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Good actors, bad scripts.
solar penguin wrote:
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
I don't 'do' Facebook so don't know .... but I would have
thought that if Binky didn't like what someone was posting
on HIS Facebook page, HE could ban the offending person.
But what would I know??
I think you can block people alright. But not being on FB
either I don't know how effective it actually is.
Blocking sounds like a sort of killfile. Binky is probably
afraid it’ll make his computer explode.
I reckon Dave likes the attention... that's why he doesn't
block/delete the people he claims are stalking him.
It all sounds a bit strange to me, as I am not sure why anybody
would actually stalk him.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9dlv28lmsx6000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Good actors, bad scripts.
Yes, Dave... I think I would agree with you on that one.
Still retcon the Timeless Child!
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:107a1mq$1lt0$3 >@gallifrey.nk.ca:
Still retcon the Timeless Child!
It already has been. Didn't you see The Reality War?
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9dlv28lmsx6000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Good actors, bad scripts.
Yes, Dave... I think I would agree with you on that one.
In article <107b9b7$26jdk$1@dont-email.me>,
Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:107a1mq$1lt0$3
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
Still retcon the Timeless Child!
It already has been. Didn't you see The Reality War?
It did nothing of the kind.
\
IT just detroyed fic points in time.
Daniel declared:
On 11/08/2025 12:22 pm, Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator
a.k.a. The Root of the Problem wrote:
"fic points"??
IT just detroyed fic points in time.
Also “detroyed” which probably means they removed all references
to the Iliad.
On 11/08/2025 12:22 pm, Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
a.k.a. The Root of the Problem wrote:
In article <107b9b7$26jdk$1@dont-email.me>,"fic points"??
Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:107a1mq$1lt0$3
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
Still retcon the Timeless Child!
It already has been. Didn't you see The Reality War?
It did nothing of the kind.
\
IT just detroyed fic points in time.
Oh!! And as it seems Binky has re-generated from "The Doctor" into
"David Shariff Yadallee", it seems I'll have to alter my Binky filter to^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted
fix that situation.
But I like his line "System Administrator a.k.a. The Root of the Problem"
--
Daniel70
On 10/08/2025 9:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:^^^^^<-PAedophile talker noted
The Doctor wrote:Not having seen The 15th Doctor (much), I can't really comment on him
In article <xn0p9dlv28lmsx6000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Good actors, bad scripts.
Yes, Dave... I think I would agree with you on that one.
.... but I'm happy to see that Binky has finaly realised that
JodieDoctor wasn't too bad .... just the scripts she got were a bit sus!!
--
Daniel70
Daniel declared:
On 11/08/2025 12:22 pm, Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator
a.k.a. The Root of the Problem wrote:
"fic points"??
IT just detroyed fic points in time.
Also “detroyed” which probably means they removed all references
to the Iliad.
--
solar penguin
On 11/08/2025 10:18 pm, solar penguin wrote:
Daniel declared:Ah!! Right. I thought they had just left Troy. ;-P
On 11/08/2025 12:22 pm, Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator
a.k.a. The Root of the Problem wrote:
"fic points"??
IT just detroyed fic points in time.
Also “detroyed” which probably means they removed all references
to the Iliad.
--
Daniel70
On 10/08/2025 9:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Not having seen The 15th Doctor (much), I can't really comment on him
In article <xn0p9dlv28lmsx6000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Good actors, bad scripts.
Yes, Dave... I think I would agree with you on that one.
.... but I'm happy to see that Binky has finaly realised that
JodieDoctor wasn't too bad .... just the scripts she got were a bit
sus!!
On 2025-08-11 12:00:51 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 10/08/2025 9:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Not having seen The 15th Doctor (much), I can't really comment on him
In article <xn0p9dlv28lmsx6000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Good actors, bad scripts.
Yes, Dave... I think I would agree with you on that one.
.... but I'm happy to see that Binky has finaly realised that
JodieDoctor wasn't too bad .... just the scripts she got were a bit
sus!!
Yep, starting with the script where the Doctor idiotically regenerated
into a female in the first place simply to appease "Politically
Correct" quotas and loud-mouthed fools. :-p
On 11/08/2025 12:22 pm, Dave Shariff Yadallee - System Administrator
a.k.a. The Root of the Problem wrote:
In article <107b9b7$26jdk$1@dont-email.me>,"fic points"??
Agent Jakanov <mouth@onlegs.org> wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:107a1mq$1lt0$3
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
Still retcon the Timeless Child!
It already has been. Didn't you see The Reality War?
It did nothing of the kind.
\
IT just detroyed fic points in time.
Oh!! And as it seems Binky has re-generated from "The Doctor" into
"David Shariff Yadallee", it seems I'll have to alter my Binky filter to
fix that situation.
But I like his line "System Administrator a.k.a. The Root of the Problem"
On 2025-08-11 12:00:51 +0000, Daniel70 said:
On 10/08/2025 9:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
The Doctor wrote:Not having seen The 15th Doctor (much), I can't really comment on him
In article <xn0p9dlv28lmsx6000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Good actors, bad scripts.
Yes, Dave... I think I would agree with you on that one.
.... but I'm happy to see that Binky has finaly realised that
JodieDoctor wasn't too bad .... just the scripts she got were a bit sus!!
Yep, starting with the script where the Doctor idiotically regenerated
into a female in the first place simply to appease "Politically Correct" quotas and loud-mouthed fools. :-p
On 12/08/2025 7:22 am, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-08-11 12:00:51 +0000, Daniel70 said:Ah!! Well, 'they' failed to appease OUR two local Rat-Bags, in any case!
On 10/08/2025 9:23 pm, Blueshirt wrote:Yep, starting with the script where the Doctor idiotically regenerated
The Doctor wrote:Not having seen The 15th Doctor (much), I can't really comment on him
In article <xn0p9dlv28lmsx6000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 9/08/2025 3:26 am, Blueshirt wrote:
Well, to be honest, he hasn't made much of an impression,
Let's talk Doctor Who so. What did you think of Ncuti
Gatwa as the 15th Doctor?
either way, on me!! ;-P
He didn't seem to make much of an impression on a lot of the
people that DID see the episodes!
Good actors, bad scripts.
Yes, Dave... I think I would agree with you on that one.
.... but I'm happy to see that Binky has finaly realised that
JodieDoctor wasn't too bad .... just the scripts she got were a bit sus!! >>
into a female in the first place simply to appease "Politically Correct"
quotas and loud-mouthed fools. :-p
--
Daniel70
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:107a1mq$1lt0$3 @gallifrey.nk.ca:
Still retcon the Timeless Child!
It already has been. Didn't you see The Reality War?
On 11/08/2025 00:17, Agent Jakanov wrote:
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) wrote in news:107a1mq$1lt0$3
@gallifrey.nk.ca:
Still retcon the Timeless Child!
It already has been. Didn't you see The Reality War?
You obviously didn't because it wasn't.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 162:33:55 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,502 |
