Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement
still
stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star Wars after
she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have a clue what
a
trilogy was and claimed that there was no source material to base it
on
despite the existence oh hundreds of Extended Universe novels and
comics
which she obviously hadn't heard of and didn't understand. She still
understands nothing about the hero's journey and tried to make Star
Wars
for 12 year-old girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's
natural
audience of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who understand
the hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual females who
will
watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic male
characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with
different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that all
of
the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the first six
movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement about seeing
the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
On 2025-07-30 10:53:30 +0000, Dumas Walker said:
Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement
still stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star Wars
after
she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have a clue what
a trilogy was and claimed that there was no source material to base it
on despite the existence oh hundreds of Extended Universe novels and
comics which she obviously hadn't heard of and didn't understand. She
still
understands nothing about the hero's journey and tried to make Star
Wars for 12 year-old girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's
natural audience of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who
understand the hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual
females who
will watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic
male
characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
Yep. The supposed "Sequel Trilogy" was really just a lazy rehash (or
"reboot" in Hollyweird-speak) of the Original Trilogy movies, with silly Politically Correct changes, thanks to Kathleen Kennedy's interferrence,
like changing the main character from male Luke to female Rey.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that all
of the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the first
six movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement about
seeing the franchise continue.
It was always going to be a bad idea to let Disney take over the
franchise. Disney is money-grubbing and had no real idea about "Star
Wars" nor what to do with it. They simply keep churning out more and
more spin-offs, most of which have been pretty bad. Kathleen Kennedy's
silly Politically Correct ideals just made things even worse.
It's also why letting Disney anywhere near Doctor Who was an equally bad idea, although Doctor Who had already succumbed to silly Political Correctness before that.
I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
There are plans to make another movie based around the character of Rey,
but it won't be part of the main now-9-movie Saga.
Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement
still
stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star Wars after
she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have a clue what
a
trilogy was and claimed that there was no source material to base it
on
despite the existence oh hundreds of Extended Universe novels and
comics
which she obviously hadn't heard of and didn't understand. She still
understands nothing about the hero's journey and tried to make Star
Wars
for 12 year-old girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's
natural
audience of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who understand
the hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual females who
will
watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic male
characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with
different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that all
of
the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the first six
movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement about seeing
the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
* SLMR 2.1a * Lye, Cheetham, and Steele: Attorneys at Law
On 2025-07-30 10:53:30 +0000, Dumas Walker said:
Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement
still stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star Wars after >>> she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have a clue what
a trilogy was and claimed that there was no source material to base it
on despite the existence oh hundreds of Extended Universe novels and
comics which she obviously hadn't heard of and didn't understand. She still >>> understands nothing about the hero's journey and tried to make Star
Wars for 12 year-old girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's
natural audience of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who
understand the hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual
females who
will watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic male >>> characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
Yep. The supposed "Sequel Trilogy" was really just a lazy rehash (or
"reboot" in Hollyweird-speak) of the Original Trilogy movies, with
silly Politically Correct changes, thanks to Kathleen Kennedy's >interferrence, like changing the main character from male Luke to
female Rey.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that all
of the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the first
six movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement about
seeing the franchise continue.
It was always going to be a bad idea to let Disney take over the
franchise. Disney is money-grubbing and had no real idea about "Star
Wars" nor what to do with it. They simply keep churning out more and
more spin-offs, most of which have been pretty bad. Kathleen Kennedy's
silly Politically Correct ideals just made things even worse.
It's also why letting Disney anywhere near Doctor Who was an equally
bad idea, although Doctor Who had already succumbed to silly Political >Correctness before that.
I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
There are plans to make another movie based around the character of
Rey, but it won't be part of the main now-9-movie Saga.
On 30/07/2025 10:53, Dumas Walker wrote:
Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement
still
stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star Wars after
she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have a clue what
a
trilogy was and claimed that there was no source material to base it
on
despite the existence oh hundreds of Extended Universe novels and
comics
which she obviously hadn't heard of and didn't understand. She still
understands nothing about the hero's journey and tried to make Star
Wars
for 12 year-old girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's
natural
audience of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who understand
the hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual females who
will
watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic male
characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
But not the Extended Universe of material otherwise she would have
followed the Thrawn Trilogy or another highly regarded sequel to Return
of the Jedi.
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with
different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
She told Jar Jar Abrams to remake A New Hope despite not understanding
what A New Hope was based on an what it was supposed to be about. It
wasn't about stupid mystery box that contained absolutely nothing which
is basically what everything Abrams has ever made has been. Just look at >Alias and Lost.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that all
of
the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the first six
movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement about seeing
the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
It took me years to finally watch 9 and it wasn't Star Wars. It was more
like a bad Indiana Jones movie. Jar Jar didn't have a clue about Star
Wars just like he didn't have a clue about Star Trek.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 31/07/2025 00:26, Your Name wrote:
On 2025-07-30 10:53:30 +0000, Dumas Walker said:
Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement
still stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star Wars
after
she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have a clue what
a trilogy was and claimed that there was no source material to base it >>>> on despite the existence oh hundreds of Extended Universe novels and
comics which she obviously hadn't heard of and didn't understand. She
still
understands nothing about the hero's journey and tried to make Star
Wars for 12 year-old girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's
natural audience of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who
understand the hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual
females who
will watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic
male
characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
Yep. The supposed "Sequel Trilogy" was really just a lazy rehash (or
"reboot" in Hollyweird-speak) of the Original Trilogy movies, with silly
Politically Correct changes, thanks to Kathleen Kennedy's interferrence,
like changing the main character from male Luke to female Rey.
The main characters were Luke, Han, and Leia and the first movie should
have been based mainly around them while introducing their children as
the new main protagonists for the next movie. Star Wars was supposed to
be the Skywalker Saga, not the Palpataine Saga.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that all
of the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the first
six movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement about
seeing the franchise continue.
It was always going to be a bad idea to let Disney take over the
franchise. Disney is money-grubbing and had no real idea about "Star
Wars" nor what to do with it. They simply keep churning out more and
Disney bought Star Wars to bring in boys and men to their audience but >instead they made it for 12 year old girls of very low intelligence and
drove away most of the original male audience, while failing to bring in
any girls to replace them, because Star Wars is not and was never for
girls. Star Wars is for boys and men and for adult women with intelligence.
more spin-offs, most of which have been pretty bad. Kathleen Kennedy's
silly Politically Correct ideals just made things even worse.
On top of falsely claiming there was no source material she threw all of >George Lucas's treatments for episodes 7 to 9 into the bin without even >bothering to read them. Does she even have a certificate to prove that
she has the reading ability expected when you leave school?
It's also why letting Disney anywhere near Doctor Who was an equally bad
idea, although Doctor Who had already succumbed to silly Political
Correctness before that.
I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
There are plans to make another movie based around the character of Rey,
but it won't be part of the main now-9-movie Saga.
Kennedy is totally incompetent. What is she blackmail Disney with to
stop her being sacked? Isn't she long past retirement age?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement
still stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star
Wars after she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have
a clue what a trilogy was and claimed that there was no source
material to base it on despite the existence oh hundreds of
Extended Universe novels and comics which she obviously hadn't
heard of and didn't understand. She still understands nothing about
the hero's journey and tried to make Star Wars for 12 year-old
girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's natural audience
of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who understand the
hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual females who will
watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic
male characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that
all of the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the
first six movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement
about seeing the franchise continue. I still have not watched
chapter 8 or 9.
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as
the first movie under her felt an awful lot like a
re-telling of "A New Hope," with different characters, and
was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy)
stated that all of the officially licensed material that
wasn't included in the first six movies was not cannon.
That really tempered my excitement about seeing the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the
fifth and sixth movies to be released or to the end of
the third trilogy of the Star Wars films??
Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as
the first movie under her felt an awful lot like a
re-telling of "A New Hope," with different characters, and
was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy)
stated that all of the officially licensed material that
wasn't included in the first six movies was not cannon.
That really tempered my excitement about seeing the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the
fifth and sixth movies to be released or to the end of
the third trilogy of the Star Wars films??
Star Wars Chapter's (Episodes) eight and nine are the last
two Star Wars films made... "The Last Jedi" in 2017 and
"Rise of the Skywalker" in 2019. Both were made by Disney
and they did not receive great acclaim from some within Star
Wars fandom. So yes, it would mean the end of the third trilogy.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as
the first movie under her felt an awful lot like a
re-telling of "A New Hope," with different characters, and
was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy)
stated that all of the officially licensed material that
wasn't included in the first six movies was not cannon.
That really tempered my excitement about seeing the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the
fifth and sixth movies to be released or to the end of
the third trilogy of the Star Wars films??
Star Wars Chapter's (Episodes) eight and nine are the last
two Star Wars films made... "The Last Jedi" in 2017 and
"Rise of the Skywalker" in 2019. Both were made by Disney
and they did not receive great acclaim from some within Star
Wars fandom. So yes, it would mean the end of the third trilogy.
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement
still stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star
Wars after she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have
a clue what a trilogy was and claimed that there was no source
material to base it on despite the existence oh hundreds of
Extended Universe novels and comics which she obviously hadn't
heard of and didn't understand. She still understands nothing about
the hero's journey and tried to make Star Wars for 12 year-old
girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's natural audience
of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who understand the
hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual females who will
watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic
male characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that
all of the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the
first six movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement
about seeing the franchise continue. I still have not watched
chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the fifth and sixth >movies to be released or to the end of the third trilogy of the Star
Wars films??
--
Daniel70
On 31/07/2025 10:13 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Make up your mind, Blueshirt. Remember "Star Wars:A New Hope" was
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as
the first movie under her felt an awful lot like a
re-telling of "A New Hope," with different characters, and
was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy)
stated that all of the officially licensed material that
wasn't included in the first six movies was not cannon.
That really tempered my excitement about seeing the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the
fifth and sixth movies to be released or to the end of
the third trilogy of the Star Wars films??
Star Wars Chapter's (Episodes) eight and nine are the last
two Star Wars films made... "The Last Jedi" in 2017 and
"Rise of the Skywalker" in 2019. Both were made by Disney
and they did not receive great acclaim from some within Star
Wars fandom. So yes, it would mean the end of the third trilogy.
actually Chapter Four in George Lucas' Nine Chapter treatment.
Chap Four first, then (when 'they' released they were 'ON' a winner)
Five, then Six, then Seven, then Eight then Nine .... then, eventually,
the first three Chapters and all the other add-on stuff.
If, as you suggest, the Ninth film released was "Rise of the Skywalker"
that would lead in nicely to the first film released, Chapter Four, "A
New Hope", which was about Luke Skywalker starting out.
--
Daniel70
On 31/07/2025 10:13 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy)
stated that all of the officially licensed material that
wasn't included in the first six movies was not cannon.
That really tempered my excitement about seeing the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8
or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the
fifth and sixth movies to be released or to the end of
the third trilogy of the Star Wars films??
Star Wars Chapter's (Episodes) eight and nine are the last
two Star Wars films made... "The Last Jedi" in 2017 and
"Rise of the Skywalker" in 2019. Both were made by Disney
and they did not receive great acclaim from some within Star
Wars fandom. So yes, it would mean the end of the third
trilogy.
Make up your mind, Blueshirt. Remember "Star Wars:A New Hope"
was actually Chapter Four in George Lucas' Nine Chapter
treatment.
Chap Four first, then (when 'they' released they were 'ON' a
winner) Five, then Six, then Seven, then Eight then Nine ....
then, eventually, the first three Chapters and all the other
add-on stuff.
If, as you suggest, the Ninth film released was "Rise of the
Skywalker"
Daniel70 wrote:
On 31/07/2025 10:13 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:Make up your mind, Blueshirt. Remember "Star Wars:A New Hope"
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy)
stated that all of the officially licensed material that
wasn't included in the first six movies was not cannon.
That really tempered my excitement about seeing the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8
or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the
fifth and sixth movies to be released or to the end of
the third trilogy of the Star Wars films??
Star Wars Chapter's (Episodes) eight and nine are the last
two Star Wars films made... "The Last Jedi" in 2017 and
"Rise of the Skywalker" in 2019. Both were made by Disney
and they did not receive great acclaim from some within Star
Wars fandom. So yes, it would mean the end of the third
trilogy.
was actually Chapter Four in George Lucas' Nine Chapter
treatment.
Chap Four first, then (when 'they' released they were 'ON' a
winner) Five, then Six, then Seven, then Eight then Nine ....
then, eventually, the first three Chapters and all the other
add-on stuff.
Er no, it went Episode 4,5 and 6... then 1,2 and 3, ... 7, 8 and
9 are in the correct order whatever way you look at it!!!
Some people 'could' get confused with the first two movie
trilogies but the last trilogy cannot change its order.
If, as you suggest, the Ninth film released was "Rise of the
Skywalker"
"Rise of the Skywalker" WAS the ninth Star Wars film released!!!
Plus there was a lot of modern messaging interwoven throughout
the scripts, sometimes to the detriment of the story... the
message was often prominent whilst the plot details were scarce.
Plus there was a lot of modern messaging interwoven
throughout the scripts, sometimes to the detriment of the
story... the message was often prominent whilst the plot
details were scarce.
That was part of my problem with the Chibnall era. I didn't
necessarily mind the messages, but they took up so much time
with some of them that the resolution of that episode's story
would feel hurried and tacked on.
It took me years to finally watch 9 and it wasn't Star Wars. It was
more like a bad Indiana Jones movie. Jar Jar didn't have a clue about
Star Wars just like he didn't have a clue about Star Trek.
palatine revived did it for me.
That was very lazy. I have not seen 8 or 9 but do know that he comes back.
The main characters were Luke, Han, and Leia and the first movie should
have been based mainly around them while introducing their children as
the new main protagonists for the next movie. Star Wars was supposed to
be the Skywalker Saga, not the Palpataine Saga.
Good point!
On top of falsely claiming there was no source material she threw all
of George Lucas's treatments for episodes 7 to 9 into the bin without
even bothering to read them.
That isn't good. Claiming you have no source material after you've decided to throw it out (for whatever reason) is dishonest at best.
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
Verity Lambert was a producer not a writer. My opening statement still
stands. Look at the mess Kathleen Kennedy has made of Star
Wars after she tried to interfere with the writing. She didn't have
a clue what a trilogy was and claimed that there was no source
material to base it on despite the existence oh hundreds of
Extended Universe novels and comics which she obviously hadn't
heard of and didn't understand. She still understands nothing about
the hero's journey and tried to make Star Wars for 12 year-old
girls of very low intelligence, rather than it's natural audience
of intelligent boys and men from the age of 6 who understand the
hero's journey and intelligent adult heterosexual females who will
watch it because of the presence of strong, masculine and heroic
male characters that they can fancy.
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as the first
movie under her felt an awful lot like a re-telling of "A New Hope,"
with different characters, and was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated that
all of the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the
first six movies was not cannon. That really tempered my excitement
about seeing the franchise continue. I still have not watched
chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the fifth and
sixth movies to be released or to the end of the third trilogy of the
Star Wars films??
On 31/07/2025 10:13 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 30/07/2025 10:53 am, Dumas Walker wrote:
Kennedy must have had some access to "source material" as
the first movie under her felt an awful lot like a
re-telling of "A New Hope," with different characters, and
was certainly nothing new.
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy)
stated that all of the officially licensed material that
wasn't included in the first six movies was not cannon.
That really tempered my excitement about seeing the
franchise continue. I still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the
fifth and sixth movies to be released or to the end of
the third trilogy of the Star Wars films??
Star Wars Chapter's (Episodes) eight and nine are the last
two Star Wars films made... "The Last Jedi" in 2017 and
"Rise of the Skywalker" in 2019. Both were made by Disney
and they did not receive great acclaim from some within Star
Wars fandom. So yes, it would mean the end of the third trilogy.
Make up your mind, Blueshirt. Remember "Star Wars:A New Hope" was
actually Chapter Four in George Lucas' Nine Chapter treatment.
Chap Four first, then (when 'they' released they were 'ON' a winner)
Five, then Six, then Seven, then Eight then Nine .... then, eventually,
the first three Chapters and all the other add-on stuff.
If, as you suggest, the Ninth film released was "Rise of the Skywalker"
that would lead in nicely to the first film released, Chapter Four, "A
New Hope", which was about Luke Skywalker starting out.
Plus there was a lot of modern messaging interwoven throughout
the scripts, sometimes to the detriment of the story... the
message was often prominent whilst the plot details were scarce.
That was part of my problem with the Chibnall era. I didn't necessarily
mind the messages, but they took up so much time with some of them that
the
resolution of that episode's story would feel hurried and tacked on.
Like
they realized, "oh, yeah, don't we need to resolve the issue we started
with in the two minutes we have left?"
On 31/07/2025 10:41, Dumas Walker wrote:
Plus there was a lot of modern messaging interwoven throughout
the scripts, sometimes to the detriment of the story... the
message was often prominent whilst the plot details were scarce.
That was part of my problem with the Chibnall era. I didn't necessarily
mind the messages, but they took up so much time with some of them that
the
It's the same single degenerate message in every single episode repeated
over and over and over again. Racism is bad, sexism is bad, capitalism
is bad; therefore men are all bad, men are all puny and week, men are
all socially inept, masculinity is toxic, men must be humiliated, >emasculated, and degraded to put them in their place, women are superior
and should make up the entire ruling class, homosexuals are superior
still, and children should all experiment in homosexuality and enjoy
being gay.
resolution of that episode's story would feel hurried and tacked on.
Like
they realized, "oh, yeah, don't we need to resolve the issue we started
with in the two minutes we have left?"
They don't care about the story or the plot or the characters. All they
care about is creating a thin shiny wrapper to attract people to the
product which conceals their sick and degenerate message, which
otherwise they would have the intelligence to steer well clear of.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated thatexcitement
all of the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the
first six movies was not cannon. That really tempered my
about seeing the franchise continue. I still have not watched
chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the fifth and
sixth
movies to be released or to the end of the third trilogy of the Star
Wars films??
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated
that all of the officially licensed material that wasn't
included in the first six movies was not cannon. That really
tempered my excitement about seeing the franchise continue. I
still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the fifth and
sixth movies to be released or to the end of the third trilogy of
the Star Wars films??
Sorry, I should probably say "Episode VIII and Episode IX" -- the
last two of the third, Disney trilogy. Episode VII was ok but it
didn't fill me with excitement to see the next two.
On 31/07/2025 6:25 pm, Dumas Walker wrote:
Sorry, I should probably say "Episode VIII and Episode IX"
-- the last two of the third, Disney trilogy. Episode VII
was ok but it didn't fill me with excitement to see the
next two.
.... but "Episode VIII and Episode IX" were the last two of
*the SECOND Trilogy* .... then 'they' went back and
filmed/released Episodes One, Two and Three of George Lucas'
original storyline.
Well I'll be buggered!! According to ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_films
they did Episodes Four, Five and Six .... then One, Two and
Three .... then completed it with Seven, Eight and Nine!!
Sorry for my error.
Daniel70 wrote:
On 31/07/2025 6:25 pm, Dumas Walker wrote:
Sorry, I should probably say "Episode VIII and Episode IX" -- the
last two of the third, Disney trilogy. Episode VII was ok but it
didn't fill me with excitement to see the next two.
.... but "Episode VIII and Episode IX" were the last two of *the
SECOND Trilogy* .... then 'they' went back and filmed/released
Episodes One, Two and Three of George Lucas' original storyline.
I did already explain it to you... in English... :-)
Well I'll be buggered!! According to ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_films
they did Episodes Four, Five and Six .... then One, Two and Three
.... then completed it with Seven, Eight and Nine!!
Who needs Wikipedia? RADW is the fount of all knowledge.
We are geeks, so we know Star Wars stuff.
You can get an education here.
Sorry for my error.
Old people don't have to apologise for forgetting things... it's what
we do!!!
On 1/08/2025 9:19 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Well I'll be buggered!! According to ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_films
they did Episodes Four, Five and Six .... then One, Two
and Three .... then completed it with Seven, Eight and
Nine!!
Who needs Wikipedia? RADW is the fount of all knowledge.
.... but that font of knowledge DISAGREED with MY font of
knowledge .... who would have thunk!!
We are geeks, so we know Star Wars stuff.
Then get on over to the 'Star Wars' groups .... or are YOU
already there??
Sorry for my error.
Old people don't have to apologise for forgetting things...
it's what we do!!!
WHAT?? Are you suggesting that "old people" might 'forget' to
apologise??
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated thatexcitement
all of the officially licensed material that wasn't included in the
first six movies was not cannon. That really tempered my
about seeing the franchise continue. I still have not watched
chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the fifth and
sixth
movies to be released or to the end of the third trilogy of the Star
Wars films??
Sorry, I should probably say "Episode VIII and Episode IX" -- the last
two
of the third, Disney trilogy. Episode VII was ok but it didn't fill me
with excitement to see the next two.
* SLMR 2.1a * Beware programmers carrying screwdrivers.
On 31/07/2025 6:25 pm, Dumas Walker wrote:
I was very disappointed when Disney (probably Kennedy) stated
that all of the officially licensed material that wasn't
included in the first six movies was not cannon. That really
tempered my excitement about seeing the franchise continue. I
still have not watched chapter 8 or 9.
When you refer to 'chapter 8 or 9' here, do you mean the fifth and
sixth movies to be released or to the end of the third trilogy of
the Star Wars films??
Sorry, I should probably say "Episode VIII and Episode IX" -- the
last two of the third, Disney trilogy. Episode VII was ok but it
didn't fill me with excitement to see the next two.
.... but "Episode VIII and Episode IX" were the last two of *the SECOND >Trilogy* .... then 'they' went back and filmed/released Episodes One,
Two and Three of George Lucas' original storyline.
Well I'll be buggered!! According to ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_films
they did Episodes Four, Five and Six .... then One, Two and Three ....
then completed it with Seven, Eight and Nine!!
Sorry for my error.
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 31/07/2025 6:25 pm, Dumas Walker wrote:
Sorry, I should probably say "Episode VIII and Episode IX"
-- the last two of the third, Disney trilogy. Episode VII
was ok but it didn't fill me with excitement to see the
next two.
.... but "Episode VIII and Episode IX" were the last two of
*the SECOND Trilogy* .... then 'they' went back and
filmed/released Episodes One, Two and Three of George Lucas'
original storyline.
I did already explain it to you... in English... :-)
Well I'll be buggered!! According to ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_films
they did Episodes Four, Five and Six .... then One, Two and
Three .... then completed it with Seven, Eight and Nine!!
Who needs Wikipedia? RADW is the fount of all knowledge. We are
geeks, so we know Star Wars stuff. You can get an education here.
Sorry for my error.
Old people don't have to apologise for forgetting things... it's
what we do!!!
On 1/08/2025 9:19 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
On 31/07/2025 6:25 pm, Dumas Walker wrote:
Sorry, I should probably say "Episode VIII and Episode IX" -- the
last two of the third, Disney trilogy. Episode VII was ok but it
didn't fill me with excitement to see the next two.
.... but "Episode VIII and Episode IX" were the last two of *the
SECOND Trilogy* .... then 'they' went back and filmed/released
Episodes One, Two and Three of George Lucas' original storyline.
I did already explain it to you... in English... :-)
Well I'll be buggered!! According to ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_films
they did Episodes Four, Five and Six .... then One, Two and Three
.... then completed it with Seven, Eight and Nine!!
Who needs Wikipedia? RADW is the fount of all knowledge.
.... but that font of knowledge DISAGREED with *MY* font of knowledge
.... who would have thunk!!
We are geeks, so we know Star Wars stuff.
Then get on over to the 'Star Wars' groups .... or are YOU already there??
You can get an education here.WHAT?? Are you suggesting that "old people" might 'forget' to apologise??
Sorry for my error.
Old people don't have to apologise for forgetting things... it's what
we do!!!
--
Daniel70
Daniel70 wrote:
On 1/08/2025 9:19 pm, Blueshirt wrote:
Daniel70 wrote:
Well I'll be buggered!! According to ...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Star_Wars_films
they did Episodes Four, Five and Six .... then One, Two
and Three .... then completed it with Seven, Eight and
Nine!!
Who needs Wikipedia? RADW is the fount of all knowledge.
.... but that font of knowledge DISAGREED with MY font of
knowledge .... who would have thunk!!
A bit like the trains in the sky eh? ;-)
We are geeks, so we know Star Wars stuff.
Then get on over to the 'Star Wars' groups .... or are YOU
already there??
Of course.
Not that much happens over there these days...
WHAT?? Are you suggesting that "old people" might 'forget' toSorry for my error.
Old people don't have to apologise for forgetting things...
it's what we do!!!
apologise??
Try reading it again...
That was part of my problem with the Chibnall era. I didn'tnecessarily
mind the messages, but they took up so much time with some of themthat
the
It's the same single degenerate message in every single episode
repeated
over and over and over again. Racism is bad, sexism is bad,
capitalism
is bad; therefore men are all bad, men are all puny and week, men are
all socially inept, masculinity is toxic, men must be humiliated, emasculated, and degraded to put them in their place, women are
superior
and should make up the entire ruling class, homosexuals are superior
still, and children should all experiment in homosexuality and enjoy
being gay.
It's almost like RTD starts his blank page with the message
he wants to send (aka virtue signal) and then puts the story
around it, and if stuff doesn't fit properly he waves it
away as a minor plot detail and moves on. There's a
'message' in "The Green Death" but there's also a damn good
story!
I wonder how much of Disney's influence there is in his
choices?
It's almost like RTD starts his blank page with the message he
wants to send (aka virtue signal) and then puts the story around
it, and if stuff doesn't fit properly he waves it away as a
minor plot detail and moves on. There's a 'message' in "The
Green Death" but there's also a damn good story!
I wonder how much of Disney's influence there is in his choices?
* SLMR 2.1a * Optimist: A Yugo owner with a trailer hitch!
Dumas Walker wrote:
It's almost like RTD starts his blank page with the message
he wants to send (aka virtue signal) and then puts the story
around it, and if stuff doesn't fit properly he waves it
away as a minor plot detail and moves on. There's a
'message' in "The Green Death" but there's also a damn good
story!
I wonder how much of Disney's influence there is in his
choices?
Not enough if the reports leaked online are true!
Although anyone who had read anything that RTD had to say over
the years would know what his views were. It's not a surprise
that he wanted to put modern messaging into his stories, but at
least write a good story first to put them in! It's the silly
stuff that he thinks everyone wants, but in reality turns out
they don't actually, that take episode time away from things
that should be important, like a coherent plot!
Not enough if the reports leaked online are true!
Although anyone who had read anything that RTD had to say over
the years would know what his views were. It's not a surprise
that he wanted to put modern messaging into his stories, but at
least write a good story first to put them in! It's the silly
stuff that he thinks everyone wants, but in reality turns out
they don't actually, that take episode time away from things
that should be important, like a coherent plot!
Not enough if the reports leaked online are true!
Although anyone who had read anything that RTD had to say over
the years would know what his views were. It's not a surprise
that he wanted to put modern messaging into his stories, but at
least write a good story first to put them in! It's the silly
stuff that he thinks everyone wants, but in reality turns out
they don't actually, that take episode time away from things
that should be important, like a coherent plot!
I agree, there should be a good story and plot first.
I have to admit something now that I had not realized. When I heard
that
RTD was coming back, I had him confused with Steven Moffat. Big
ooops!!!
I had high hopes as a result as I have enjoyed some of his past work, >especially with Mark Gatiss (on Dr Who and Sherlock).
So aside from getting rid of Chibnall, it sounds like the Who Universe
really didn't change for (or revert back to) the better.
* SLMR 2.1a * In plumbing, a straight flush is better than a full
house
Sorry for my error.
No problem. I had to think about it for a minute to make sure it
wasn't my
error. ;)
* SLMR 2.1a * No Purchase Required. Details in package.
Although anyone who had read anything that RTD had to say
over the years would know what his views were. It's not a
surprise that he wanted to put modern messaging into his
stories, but at least write a good story first to put them
in! It's the silly stuff that he thinks everyone wants, but
in reality turns out they don't actually, that take episode
time away from things that should be important, like a
coherent plot!
I agree, there should be a good story and plot first.
I have to admit something now that I had not realized.
When I heard that RTD was coming back, I had him confused
with Steven Moffat. Big ooops!!!
I had high hopes as a result as I have enjoyed some of his
past work, especially with Mark Gatiss (on Dr Who and
Sherlock).
So aside from getting rid of Chibnall, it sounds like the
Who Universe really didn't change for (or revert back to)
the better.
Dumas Walker wrote:
Although anyone who had read anything that RTD had to say
over the years would know what his views were. It's not a
surprise that he wanted to put modern messaging into his
stories, but at least write a good story first to put them
in! It's the silly stuff that he thinks everyone wants, but
in reality turns out they don't actually, that take episode
time away from things that should be important, like a
coherent plot!
I agree, there should be a good story and plot first.
Of course, RTD might consider that his stories are good and
they DO have good plots...
I have to admit something now that I had not realized.
When I heard that RTD was coming back, I had him confused
with Steven Moffat. Big ooops!!!
I doubt it makes any difference who the "Doctor Who" showrunner
is these days. Most of the television industry, especially the
BBC, are all about diversity, inclusion and supporting whatever
minority rights they can. They see it as reflecting the modern
world we live in. So if it hadn't had been RTD it would have
been somebody else.
I had high hopes as a result as I have enjoyed some of his
past work, especially with Mark Gatiss (on Dr Who and
Sherlock).
Some would say the rot started with Steven Moffat... his era
gave us Missy and the Moon being an egg! ;-)
So aside from getting rid of Chibnall, it sounds like the
Who Universe really didn't change for (or revert back to)
the better.
Better is not something I'd be getting my hopes up about.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 09:34:06 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,060 |
| Messages: | 6,416,673 |