We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the moment he took over
from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/rtd-no-clue-doctor-who-future-106093.htm
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the moment he took over
from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/rtd-no-clue-doctor-who-future-106093.htm
We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the moment
he took over from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
The True Doctor wrote:
We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the momenthttps://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/rtd-no-clue-doctor-who-future-106093.htm
he took over from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
In fairness it's been the same story for months... they are
[supposedly] all waiting on Disney to renew or cancel their
partnership with the BBC. Which could mean the uncertainty lasts
until after "The War Between the Land and the Sea" is aired.
The True Doctor wrote:
We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the moment he
took over from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
So poor Russel is being shut out of negotiations between the
two TV services?
Woozy Song wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/rtd-no-clue-doctor-who-future-106093.htm
We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the moment he
took over from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
So poor Russel is being shut out of negotiations between the
two TV services?
Proper order!
And if the BBC can keep hold of Disney, or when they agree
something with a new partner, I hope they keep RTD out of
"Doctor Who" going forward...
The True Doctor wrote:
We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the moment he took over
from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/rtd-no-clue-doctor-who-future-106093.htm
So poor Russel is being shut out of negotiations between the two TV
services?
Woozy Song wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/rtd-no-clue-doctor-who-future-106093.htm
We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the moment he
took over from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
So poor Russel is being shut out of negotiations between the
two TV services?
Proper order!
And if the BBC can keep hold of Disney, or when they agree
something with a new partner, I hope they keep RTD out of
"Doctor Who" going forward...
On 14/08/2025 13:20, Blueshirt wrote:
Woozy Song wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:https://www.doctorwhotv.co.uk/rtd-no-clue-doctor-who-future-106093.htm
We already knew Davies didn't have a clue from the moment he
took over from Chibnall who didn't have a clue either.
So poor Russel is being shut out of negotiations between the
two TV services?
Proper order!
And if the BBC can keep hold of Disney, or when they agree
something with a new partner, I hope they keep RTD out of
"Doctor Who" going forward...
The only solution is to do a Dallas and erase everything from Whittaker >onwards by turning it into Clara's dream.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
In article <xn0p9jau01n2plg007@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Woozy Song wrote:
So poor Russel is being shut out of negotiations between
the two TV services?
Proper order!
And if the BBC can keep hold of Disney, or when they agree
something with a new partner, I hope they keep RTD out of
"Doctor Who" going forward...
And get someone brand new!
Gaiman and Moffat do not qualify.
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9jau01n2plg007@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
Woozy Song wrote:
So poor Russel is being shut out of negotiations between
the two TV services?
Proper order!
And if the BBC can keep hold of Disney, or when they agree
something with a new partner, I hope they keep RTD out of
"Doctor Who" going forward...
And get someone brand new!
My preference, for all that it matters, would be for someone
fresh to Doctor Who.
Gaiman and Moffat do not qualify.
I think it's safe to say Neil Gaiman wouldn't be getting the
job!
Verily, in article <xn0p9jn5phbl543000@post.eweka.nl>, did >blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The Doctor wrote:
Gaiman and Moffat do not qualify.
I think it's safe to say Neil Gaiman wouldn't be getting the
job!
Yeah, the show already has someone we have to call "Master."
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
Verily, in article <107lqfo$1sou$8@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <MPG.4307fad9f45fa3f79897f6@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0p9jn5phbl543000@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The Doctor wrote:
Gaiman and Moffat do not qualify.
I think it's safe to say Neil Gaiman wouldn't be getting the
job!
Yeah, the show already has someone we have to call "Master."
Do you recall the Doctor's Wife?
I do, yes. I didn't really like it. A lot of the fandom at the time did,
but I would have preferred the TARDIS to stay the TARDIS.
A better take (IMO) on the TARDIS being independently active was in
"Heaven Sent." That was a mighty fine hour of television *and* some good
(if unusual) Doctor Who, and the TARDIS took some action while still
being its ordinary, semisentient self.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
In article <MPG.43081bca2db398619897fd@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
Timelords can now change gender.
Verily, in article <107lqfo$1sou$8@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <MPG.4307fad9f45fa3f79897f6@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <xn0p9jn5phbl543000@post.eweka.nl>, did
blueshirt@indigo.news deliver unto us this message:
The Doctor wrote:
Gaiman and Moffat do not qualify.
I think it's safe to say Neil Gaiman wouldn't be getting the
job!
Yeah, the show already has someone we have to call "Master."
Do you recall the Doctor's Wife?
I do, yes. I didn't really like it. A lot of the fandom at the time did,
but I would have preferred the TARDIS to stay the TARDIS.
A better take (IMO) on the TARDIS being independently active was in
"Heaven Sent." That was a mighty fine hour of television *and* some good
(if unusual) Doctor Who, and the TARDIS took some action while still
being its ordinary, semisentient self.
On 2025-08-15 00:14:42 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
It's when Timelords regenerate into liquid beings ... sentient puddles
of goo, basically like crew member Yaphit on "The Orville". ;-) <https://orville.fandom.com/wiki/Yaphit>
In article <xn0p9jn5phbl543000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And get someone brand new!
Gaiman and Moffat do not qualify.
I think it's safe to say Neil Gaiman wouldn't be getting
the job!
He is the one who started the gender fluidity!
On 2025-08-15 00:14:42 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
It's when Timelords regenerate into liquid beings ... sentient puddles
of goo, basically like crew member Yaphit on "The Orville". ;-) ><https://orville.fandom.com/wiki/Yaphit>
On 15/08/2025 06:15, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43081bca2db398619897fd@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
Timelords can now change gender.
No they can't. That idea is nothing more than fan fic. It never happened >because nothing from Kill the Moon onwards is considered to be canon.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9jn5phbl543000@post.eweka.nl>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The Doctor wrote:
And get someone brand new!
Gaiman and Moffat do not qualify.
I think it's safe to say Neil Gaiman wouldn't be getting
the job!
He is the one who started the gender fluidity!
Yes. But clearly you haven't been paying attention to events
since then... (No surprise there of course.)
Let's just say the BBC would not be giving Neil Gaiman the job.
Or more accurately... any job!!!
The TARDIS played no part in Heaven Sent. It was all set inside the
Doctor's Time Dial repeating the same actions over and over again for 4 billion years. Are you confusing it with Hell Bent, and even then the
TARDIS does nothing other than being a TARDIS.
Verily, in article <107mfpk$1b1r$2@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <MPG.43081bca2db398619897fd@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
Timelords can now change gender.
Oh. I'm ignoring that. :)
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
On 15/08/2025 7:10 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
The TARDIS played no part in Heaven Sent. It was all set inside theSo The Doctor can re-generate over and over and over and over again for
Doctor's Time Dial repeating the same actions over and over again for 4
billion years. Are you confusing it with Hell Bent, and even then the
TARDIS does nothing other than being a TARDIS.
four billion years ..... but The Doctor couldn't possibly be The
Timeless Child and regenerate a couple of billion (maybe) times before
we got to DoctorBill!!
--
Daniel70
Verily, in article <107nett$235j$23@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <MPG.4308d49123708059897ff@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107mlia$vld7$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
On 2025-08-15 00:14:42 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
It's when Timelords regenerate into liquid beings ... sentient puddles
of goo, basically like crew member Yaphit on "The Orville". ;-)
Heh, the Doctor regenerating into an inhuman shape could be a fun short.
It'd be about as serious as "The Curse of Fatal Death."
You have seen CoFD I see.
I have, though not in years. It was funny.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
Verily, in article <107ne6l$235j$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <107mtm9$1138b$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 15/08/2025 06:15, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43081bca2db398619897fd@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
Timelords can now change gender.
No they can't. That idea is nothing more than fan fic. It never happened
because nothing from Kill the Moon onwards is considered to be canon.
That is why I say the point to fix this mess starts from the Doctor's Wife.
If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner, how would you fix
it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon the Timeless
Child." I mean specifically. What would the plot(s) look like?
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
Daniel demanded:
On 15/08/2025 7:10 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
The TARDIS played no part in Heaven Sent. It was all set inside theSo The Doctor can re-generate over and over and over and over again for
Doctor's Time Dial repeating the same actions over and over again for 4
billion years. Are you confusing it with Hell Bent, and even then the
TARDIS does nothing other than being a TARDIS.
four billion years ..... but The Doctor couldn't possibly be The
Timeless Child and regenerate a couple of billion (maybe) times before
we got to DoctorBill!!
But the Doctor didn’t regenerate over and over and over and
over again in the Confession Dial. He kept dying over and over
and over and over again, and the teleport kept resurrecting him
over and over and over and over again. But no regeneration.
(Well, I suppose in theory it might be technically possible that
he might’ve regenerated before some of those deaths, but
the teleport would’ve reset his body like that never happened
when it resurrected him. So they still don’t count.)
--
solar penguin
Verily, in article <107ne6l$235j$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <107mtm9$1138b$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 15/08/2025 06:15, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43081bca2db398619897fd@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
Timelords can now change gender.
No they can't. That idea is nothing more than fan fic. It never happened >>> because nothing from Kill the Moon onwards is considered to be canon.
That is why I say the point to fix this mess starts from the Doctor's Wife.
If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner, how would you fix
it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon the Timeless
Child." I mean specifically. What would the plot(s) look like?
On 15/08/2025 7:10 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
The TARDIS played no part in Heaven Sent. It was all set inside theSo The Doctor can re-generate over and over and over and over again for
Doctor's Time Dial repeating the same actions over and over again for
4 billion years. Are you confusing it with Hell Bent, and even then
the TARDIS does nothing other than being a TARDIS.
four billion years ..... but The Doctor couldn't possibly be The
Timeless Child and regenerate a couple of billion (maybe) times before
we got to DoctorBill!!
Verily, in article <107ne6l$235j$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <107mtm9$1138b$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 15/08/2025 06:15, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43081bca2db398619897fd@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
Timelords can now change gender.
No they can't. That idea is nothing more than fan fic. It never happened >>> because nothing from Kill the Moon onwards is considered to be canon.
That is why I say the point to fix this mess starts from the Doctor's Wife.
If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner, how would you fix
it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon the Timeless
Child." I mean specifically. What would the plot(s) look like?
Verily, in article <107ob9c$1chtu$1@dont-email.me>, did
YourName@YourISP.com deliver unto us this message:
On 2025-08-15 14:18:11 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
Verily, in article <107ne6l$235j$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <107mtm9$1138b$4@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 15/08/2025 06:15, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43081bca2db398619897fd@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
Timelords can now change gender.
No they can't. That idea is nothing more than fan fic. It never happened >> >>> because nothing from Kill the Moon onwards is considered to be canon.
That is why I say the point to fix this mess starts from the Doctor's Wife.
If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner, how would you fix >> > it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon the Timeless
Child." I mean specifically. What would the plot(s) look like?
"Doctor Who: Dallas" - The Doctor or his companion wakes up in the
shower realising the last few years have all just been a bad dream. :-p
Peter Capaldi has been trapped on the holodeck this whole time.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
On 15/08/2025 15:03, Daniel70 wrote:
On 15/08/2025 7:10 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
The TARDIS played no part in Heaven Sent. It was all set inside theSo The Doctor can re-generate over and over and over and over again for
Doctor's Time Dial repeating the same actions over and over again for
4 billion years. Are you confusing it with Hell Bent, and even then
the TARDIS does nothing other than being a TARDIS.
four billion years ..... but The Doctor couldn't possibly be The
Timeless Child and regenerate a couple of billion (maybe) times before
we got to DoctorBill!!
You've obviously never watched the episode. The Doctor never regenerated
even once. He died just after he materialised another copy of himself
from the transporter buffer.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 2025-08-15 14:18:11 +0000, Melissa Hollingsworth said:
Verily, in article <107ne6l$235j$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <107mtm9$1138b$4@dont-email.me>,If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner, how would you fix
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 15/08/2025 06:15, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.43081bca2db398619897fd@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107lr0s$16rd$1@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
This is where Gaiman introduced the Timelord Fluidity.
What is that?
Timelords can now change gender.
No they can't. That idea is nothing more than fan fic. It never happened >>>> because nothing from Kill the Moon onwards is considered to be canon.
That is why I say the point to fix this mess starts from the Doctor's Wife. >>
it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon the Timeless
Child." I mean specifically. What would the plot(s) look like?
"Doctor Who: Dallas" - The Doctor or his companion wakes up in the
shower realising the last few years have all just been a bad dream. :-p
In article
<MPG.4308e182a6dea980989806@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner,
how would you fix it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon
the Timeless Child." I mean specifically. What would the
plot(s) look like?
It should get rid of the gender fluidity. Step 1.
On 15/08/2025 15:03, Daniel70 wrote:
On 15/08/2025 7:10 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
The TARDIS played no part in Heaven Sent. It was all set inside theSo The Doctor can re-generate over and over and over and over again
Doctor's Time Dial repeating the same actions over and over again for
4 billion years. Are you confusing it with Hell Bent, and even then
the TARDIS does nothing other than being a TARDIS.
for four billion years ..... but The Doctor couldn't possibly be The
Timeless Child and regenerate a couple of billion (maybe) times before
we got to DoctorBill!!
You've obviously never watched the episode. The Doctor never regenerated
even once. He died just after he materialised another copy of himself
from the transporter buffer.
The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.4308e182a6dea980989806@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner,
how would you fix it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon
the Timeless Child." I mean specifically. What would the
plot(s) look like?
It should get rid of the gender fluidity. Step 1.
The toothpaste isn't going back into the tube!
On 16/08/2025 10:19 am, The True Doctor wrote:
On 15/08/2025 15:03, Daniel70 wrote:Oh!! Right! No regeneration ...... just a new copy .... the same as the
On 15/08/2025 7:10 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
<Snip>
The TARDIS played no part in Heaven Sent. It was all set inside theSo The Doctor can re-generate over and over and over and over again
Doctor's Time Dial repeating the same actions over and over again for
4 billion years. Are you confusing it with Hell Bent, and even then
the TARDIS does nothing other than being a TARDIS.
for four billion years ..... but The Doctor couldn't possibly be The
Timeless Child and regenerate a couple of billion (maybe) times before
we got to DoctorBill!!
You've obviously never watched the episode. The Doctor never regenerated
even once. He died just after he materialised another copy of himself
from the transporter buffer.
last copy!!
--
Daniel70
Verily, in article <107ojg6$1e56n$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It would be an exact recreation of the scene from Dallas
where Pam wakes up from a bad dream as Bobby walks out of
the shower. In fact that exact scene will be playing on a TV
screen in the background as Clara wakes up and sees Peter
Capladi walking out of the TARDIS.
Hmm, maybe. Not sure about such an exact recreation, but the
reference could work.
Verily, in article <107opd2$28al$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Still have to deal with the Doctor's Wife.
We can come up with some BS for that. Idris was just working with House
the whole time, playacting.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107ojg6$1e56n$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It would be an exact recreation of the scene from Dallas
where Pam wakes up from a bad dream as Bobby walks out of
the shower. In fact that exact scene will be playing on a TV
screen in the background as Clara wakes up and sees Peter
Capladi walking out of the TARDIS.
Hmm, maybe. Not sure about such an exact recreation, but the
reference could work.
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.4308e182a6dea980989806@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner,
how would you fix it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon
the Timeless Child." I mean specifically. What would the
plot(s) look like?
It should get rid of the gender fluidity. Step 1.
The toothpaste isn't going back into the tube!
On 2025-08-16 08:03:50 +0000, Blueshirt said:
The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.4308e182a6dea980989806@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
If the BBC Fairy appeared and made you the showrunner,
how would you fix it?
I don't mean generally; I already know that's "retcon
the Timeless Child." I mean specifically. What would the
plot(s) look like?
It should get rid of the gender fluidity. Step 1.
The toothpaste isn't going back into the tube!
It does sometimes. Occasionally, if I squeeze the tube too hard,
releasing the grip slightly does mean some (or even all) of the
toothpaste does go back into the tube. :-)
In article <MPG.430a2a761d563bb398981b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107opd2$28al$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Still have to deal with the Doctor's Wife.
We can come up with some BS for that. Idris was just working with House
the whole time, playacting.
Idris?
Verily, in article <107ojg6$1e56n$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It would be an exact recreation of the scene from Dallas where Pam wakes
up from a bad dream as Bobby walks out of the shower. In fact that exact
scene will be playing on a TV screen in the background as Clara wakes up
and sees Peter Capladi walking out of the TARDIS.
Hmm, maybe. Not sure about such an exact recreation, but the reference
could work.
It can follow on
directly from the ending of Last Christmas reinstating Moffat's
originally planned ending, and erase everything from continuity from
Kill the Moon onwards.
What did he originally plan?
Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107ojg6$1e56n$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It would be an exact recreation of the scene from Dallas
where Pam wakes up from a bad dream as Bobby walks out of
the shower. In fact that exact scene will be playing on a TV
screen in the background as Clara wakes up and sees Peter
Capladi walking out of the TARDIS.
Hmm, maybe. Not sure about such an exact recreation, but the
reference could work.
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly exists
since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of energy, and
without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist either. He would
have even have even been conceived or loomed.
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe
since the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
Flat out erasure and everything being a bad dream is the only solution.
Yep. They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm and
a young Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time arc really ended!
On 16/08/2025 15:17, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.430a2a761d563bb398981b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107opd2$28al$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Still have to deal with the Doctor's Wife.
We can come up with some BS for that. Idris was just working with House
the whole time, playacting.
Idris?
Did you actually watch the episode?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
On 16/08/2025 14:40, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107ojg6$1e56n$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
It would be an exact recreation of the scene from Dallas where Pam wakes >>> up from a bad dream as Bobby walks out of the shower. In fact that exact >>> scene will be playing on a TV screen in the background as Clara wakes up >>> and sees Peter Capladi walking out of the TARDIS.
Hmm, maybe. Not sure about such an exact recreation, but the reference
could work.
It can follow on
directly from the ending of Last Christmas reinstating Moffat's
originally planned ending, and erase everything from continuity from
Kill the Moon onwards.
What did he originally plan?
That the Doctor would arrive in Clara's bedroom to save her when she was >already an old women. This would allow a much older Jenna Coleman or her
to be replaced with another actress playing her as an old women.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True loon gave a lesson on natural laws:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly exists
since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of energy, and
without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist either. He would
have even have even been conceived or loomed.
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe
since the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
Flat out erasure and everything being a bad dream is the only solution.
Yep. They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm and
a young Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time arc really ended!
--
solar penguin
On 17/08/2025 10:24, stupid penguin wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly exists
since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of energy, and
without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist either. He would
have even have even been conceived or loomed.
...wouldn't have even been...
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe
since the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Nope. The Doctor said it worked by neutralising inertia; since the
concepts of physics and telepathy in The Pirate Planet were derived by >Douglas Adams directly from E E Smith's Lensman series.
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind of >anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
No it didn't. If you're going to be like that then it ended in 1963
since time travel except travel forwards in time is impossible.
Flat out erasure and everything being a bad dream is the only solution.
Yep. They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm and
a young Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time arc really ended!
They won't need to do anything of the kind. No one saw the moon hatch
into a space dragon which then flew away with nearly all of the moon's
mass and at the same time replaced the moon with another egg of exactly
the same mass as itself which looked exactly the same as the original
moon with all the laser reflector missions, moon buggies, golf clubs,
golf balls, American flags, footprints, and moon lander first stages all >still there where they've always been, and all without affecting the
Earth's orbit or climate in the process.
There is no suspension of disbelief for Kill the Moon whatsoever.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe since
the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm
and a young Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time
arc really ended.
solar penguin wrote:
The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe since
the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Er... okay.
<Thinks this is starting to get a bit weird now...>
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
I see what you did there.
They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm
and a young Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time
arc really ended.
I'd watch!
An AI Fourth Doctor and Romana (v1.0) that is...
On 16/08/2025 15:17, The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.430a2a761d563bb398981b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107opd2$28al$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Still have to deal with the Doctor's Wife.
We can come up with some BS for that. Idris was just
working with House the whole time, playacting.
Idris?
Did you actually watch the episode?
solar penguin wrote:
The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe since
the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Er... okay.
<Thinks this is starting to get a bit weird now...>
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
I see what you did there.
They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm
and a young Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time
arc really ended.
I'd watch!
An AI Fourth Doctor and Romana (v1.0) that is...
On 17/08/2025 10:24, stupid penguin wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything
in the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly
exists since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of
energy, and without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist
either. He would have even have even been conceived or loomed.
...wouldn't have even been...
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe since
the linear induction corridor violates the conservation of
momentum, which can’t happen without also violating conservation of
energy, and of mass.
Nope. The Doctor said it worked by neutralising inertia; since the
concepts of physics and telepathy in The Pirate Planet were derived
by Douglas Adams directly from E E Smith's Lensman series.
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind
of anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
No it didn't. If you're going to be like that then it ended in 1963
since time travel except travel forwards in time is impossible.
Flat out erasure and everything being a bad dream is the only
solution.
Yep. They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm and a young
Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time arc really ended!
They won't need to do anything of the kind. No one saw the moon hatch
into a space dragon which then flew away with nearly all of the
moon's mass and at the same time replaced the moon with another egg
of exactly the same mass as itself which looked exactly the same as
the original moon with all the laser reflector missions, moon
buggies, golf clubs, golf balls, American flags, footprints, and moon
lander first stages all still there where they've always been,
In article <107sb2e$2830n$2@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/08/2025 10:24, stupid penguin wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly exists >>>> since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of energy, and
without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist either. He would >>>> have even have even been conceived or loomed.
...wouldn't have even been...
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe
since the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Nope. The Doctor said it worked by neutralising inertia; since the
concepts of physics and telepathy in The Pirate Planet were derived by
Douglas Adams directly from E E Smith's Lensman series.
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind of
anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
No it didn't. If you're going to be like that then it ended in 1963
since time travel except travel forwards in time is impossible.
Flat out erasure and everything being a bad dream is the only solution. >>>>
Yep. They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm and
a young Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time arc really ended!
They won't need to do anything of the kind. No one saw the moon hatch
into a space dragon which then flew away with nearly all of the moon's
mass and at the same time replaced the moon with another egg of exactly
the same mass as itself which looked exactly the same as the original
moon with all the laser reflector missions, moon buggies, golf clubs,
golf balls, American flags, footprints, and moon lander first stages all
still there where they've always been, and all without affecting the
Earth's orbit or climate in the process.
There is no suspension of disbelief for Kill the Moon whatsoever.
As in the Moon as an Egg and that the creature is born pregnant.
In article <xn0p9ngxi9ixkj001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 15:17, The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.430a2a761d563bb398981b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107opd2$28al$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Still have to deal with the Doctor's Wife.
We can come up with some BS for that. Idris was just
working with House the whole time, playacting.
Idris?
Did you actually watch the episode?
He keeps mentioning the episode but he doesn't seem to know
what's actually in it!
Clue for Dave: Idris rhymes with TARDIS.
What about Idris Elba?
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/08/2025 10:24, stupid penguin wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly exists >>>> since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of energy, and
without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist either. He would >>>> have even have even been conceived or loomed.
...wouldn't have even been...
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe
since the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Nope. The Doctor said it worked by neutralising inertia; since the
concepts of physics and telepathy in The Pirate Planet were derived by
Douglas Adams directly from E E Smith's Lensman series.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc, again.
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind of
anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Inertia is momentum. They’re the same thing. If you’re
neutralising inertia you’re literally neutralising momentum.
That’s what inertia means.
And the Doctor even confirms that it’s breaking conservation
of momentum later, in his conversation with Romana later.
DOCTOR: No, no, no, wait a minute. The inertia neutraliser. You
know, I think the conservation of momentum is a very important law
in physics, don't you?
ROMANA: Yes.
DOCTOR: I don't think anyone should tamper with it, do you?
So according to the Doctor himself, conservation of momentum
can be violated, even though he thinks it shouldn’t be allowed.
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
No it didn't. If you're going to be like that then it ended in 1963
since time travel except travel forwards in time is impossible.
So you’re happy accepting some impossible things but not
others?
Double standards?
Yep. They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm and
a young Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time arc really ended!
They won't need to do anything of the kind. No one saw the moon hatch
into a space dragon which then flew away with nearly all of the moon's
mass and at the same time replaced the moon with another egg of exactly
the same mass as itself which looked exactly the same as the original
moon with all the laser reflector missions, moon buggies, golf clubs,
golf balls, American flags, footprints, and moon lander first stages all
still there where they've always been, and all without affecting the
Earth's orbit or climate in the process.
Who says all the flags, golf balls, etc. are still there? You made
that up, didn’t you?
There is no suspension of disbelief for Kill the Moon whatsoever.
i to the
That still doesn’t mean Doctor Who ended. It just means it
had a disappointing episode. Big deal. In a programme that’s
lasted as long as Doctor Who, there are always going to be
a few episodes that are more disappointing than others.
Verily, in article <107squ7$2cuph$2@dont-email.me>, did agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
As in the Moon as an Egg and that the creature is born pregnant.
Pregnant with twice the mass of the moon?
It has Time Lord technology in its biology. It's bigger on the inside.
Verily, in article <107sdhg$25rr$13@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did >doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
In article <107s50j$25t6l$5@dont-email.me>,
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 16/08/2025 15:17, The Doctor wrote:
In article <MPG.430a2a761d563bb398981b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107opd2$28al$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Still have to deal with the Doctor's Wife.
We can come up with some BS for that. Idris was just working with House >> >>> the whole time, playacting.
Idris?
Did you actually watch the episode?
I am wondering if she refers to Idris Elba.
I mean the woman into whom House allegedly transferred the
soul^H^H^H^Hmatrix of the TARDIS. Wasn't she named Idris? Wikipedia says
she was, at least.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
On 17/08/2025 8:31 pm, The True Doctor wrote:
On 17/08/2025 10:24, stupid penguin wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything
in the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly
exists since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of
energy, and without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist
either. He would have even have even been conceived or loomed.
...wouldn't have even been...
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe since
the linear induction corridor violates the conservation of
momentum, which can’t happen without also violating conservation of
energy, and of mass.
Nope. The Doctor said it worked by neutralising inertia; since the
concepts of physics and telepathy in The Pirate Planet were derived
by Douglas Adams directly from E E Smith's Lensman series.
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind
of anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Doctor Who ended in 1978.
What's this "Doctor Who" to which you refer?? Never heard of it here in
*MY* Universe!! ;-P
No it didn't. If you're going to be like that then it ended in 1963
since time travel except travel forwards in time is impossible.
Flat out erasure and everything being a bad dream is the only
solution.
Yep. They’ll have to create AI deepfakes of Mary Tamm and a young
Tom Baker, and reveal how the Key To Time arc really ended!
They won't need to do anything of the kind. No one saw the moon hatch
into a space dragon which then flew away with nearly all of the
moon's mass and at the same time replaced the moon with another egg
of exactly the same mass as itself which looked exactly the same as
the original moon with all the laser reflector missions, moon
buggies, golf clubs, golf balls, American flags, footprints, and moon
lander first stages all still there where they've always been,
Do we know that all these thing were actually still in "their positions"
on the NEW, IMPROVED Moon?? Have "WE" been back to OUR Moon since??
Might The Moon flying away have been in a parallel Universe??
--
Daniel70
On 17/08/2025 12:36, The Doctor wrote:
In article <xn0p9ngxi9ixkj001@news.eternal-september.org>,
Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 15:17, The Doctor wrote:
In article
<MPG.430a2a761d563bb398981b@news.eternal-september.org>,
Melissa Hollingsworth <thetruemelissa@gmail.com> wrote:
Verily, in article <107opd2$28al$4@gallifrey.nk.ca>, did
doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca deliver unto us this message:
Still have to deal with the Doctor's Wife.
We can come up with some BS for that. Idris was just
working with House the whole time, playacting.
Idris?
Did you actually watch the episode?
He keeps mentioning the episode but he doesn't seem to know
what's actually in it!
Clue for Dave: Idris rhymes with TARDIS.
What about Idris Elba?
Is Idris Elba a woman?
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
Verily, in article <107squ7$2cuph$2@dont-email.me>, did >agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
As in the Moon as an Egg and that the creature is born pregnant.
Pregnant with twice the mass of the moon?
It has Time Lord technology in its biology. It's bigger on the inside.
--
Saturday Doctor Who watch party 1:00 p.m. Pacific time
This week: "Inferno" [Third Doctor] >https://discord.gg/p3ujkCa4?event=1403862135594811423
On 17/08/2025 16:10, Melissa Hollingsworth wrote:
Verily, in article <107squ7$2cuph$2@dont-email.me>, did
agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM deliver unto us this message:
As in the Moon as an Egg and that the creature is born pregnant.
Pregnant with twice the mass of the moon?
It has Time Lord technology in its biology. It's bigger on the inside.
Geological surveys of the moon and its inerior show nothing of the kind.
--
The True Doctor https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCngrZwoS0n21IRcXpKO79Lw
"To be woke is to be uninformed which is exactly the opposite of what it >stands for." --William Shatner
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/08/2025 10:24, stupid penguin wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly exists >>>> since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of energy, and
without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist either. He would >>>> have even have even been conceived or loomed.
...wouldn't have even been...
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe
since the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Nope. The Doctor said it worked by neutralising inertia; since the
concepts of physics and telepathy in The Pirate Planet were derived by
Douglas Adams directly from E E Smith's Lensman series.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc, again.
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind of
anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Inertia is momentum. They’re the same thing. If you’re
neutralising inertia you’re literally neutralising momentum.
That’s what inertia means.
On 18/08/2025 12:23 am, solar penguin wrote:
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/08/2025 10:24, stupid penguin wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly exists >>>>> since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of energy, and >>>>> without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist either. He would >>>>> have even have even been conceived or loomed.
...wouldn't have even been...
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe
since the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Nope. The Doctor said it worked by neutralising inertia; since the
concepts of physics and telepathy in The Pirate Planet were derived by
Douglas Adams directly from E E Smith's Lensman series.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc, again.
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind of
anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Inertia is momentum. They’re the same thing. If you’re
neutralising inertia you’re literally neutralising momentum.
That’s what inertia means.
From DuckDuckGo
inertia /ĭ-nûr′shə/
noun
The tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in
straight line motion to stay in motion in a straight line unless acted
on by an outside force; the resistance of a body to changes in momentum. >Resistance or disinclination to motion, action, or change.
"an entrenched bureaucracy's inertia."
That property of matter by which it tends when at rest to remain
so, and *when in motion to continue in motion* , and in the same
straight line or direction, *unless acted on by some external force* ;
-- sometimes called vis inertiæ. *The inertia of a body is proportional
to its mass* .
--
Daniel70
Daniel declared:
On 18/08/2025 12:23 am, solar penguin wrote:
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
On 17/08/2025 10:24, stupid penguin wrote:
The True Doctor wrote:
On 16/08/2025 14:49, Blueshirt wrote:
Easier than a shower scene... they could just say everything in
the show since ____ (enter a date that suits your own head
canon) is set in an alternate universe.
Mavity could have been a thing since then too!
Simples.
No. Kill the Moon can't work in any universe that could possibly exists >>>>>> since it violates the laws of gravity and conservation of energy, and >>>>>> without those laws existing the Doctor wouldn't exist either. He would >>>>>> have even have even been conceived or loomed.
...wouldn't have even been...
In that case, The Pirate Planet can’t happen in any universe
since the linear induction corridor violates the conservation
of momentum, which can’t happen without also violating
conservation of energy, and of mass.
Nope. The Doctor said it worked by neutralising inertia; since the
concepts of physics and telepathy in The Pirate Planet were derived by >>>> Douglas Adams directly from E E Smith's Lensman series.
Post hoc ergo propter hoc, again.
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind of >>>> anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Inertia is momentum. They’re the same thing. If you’re
neutralising inertia you’re literally neutralising momentum.
That’s what inertia means.
From DuckDuckGo
inertia /ĭ-nûr′shə/
noun
The tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in
straight line motion to stay in motion in a straight line unless acted
on by an outside force; the resistance of a body to changes in momentum.
Resistance or disinclination to motion, action, or change.
"an entrenched bureaucracy's inertia."
That property of matter by which it tends when at rest to remain
so, and *when in motion to continue in motion* , and in the same
straight line or direction, *unless acted on by some external force* ;
-- sometimes called vis inertiæ. *The inertia of a body is proportional
to its mass* .
Thank you. It looks like my memory was cheating and I might’ve
been wrong about momentum being the same as inertia.
Never mind. As the Doctor himself once said: ‘Even I am
occasionally wrong about some things.
OTOH inertia is proportional to mass, which means the corridor
is still violating the conservation of mass (with the side effect
of violating conservation of momentum as a byproduct
since that’s also proportional to mass.)
So it still ends up violating physics, and my wider point still
stands. (Not that I deserve such luck!)
--
solar penguin
Daniel declared:
On 18/08/2025 12:23 am, solar penguin wrote:
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the
same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind of >>>> anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Inertia is momentum. They’re the same thing. If you’re
neutralising inertia you’re literally neutralising momentum.
That’s what inertia means.
From DuckDuckGo
inertia /ĭ-nûr′shə/
noun
The tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in
straight line motion to stay in motion in a straight line unless acted
on by an outside force; the resistance of a body to changes in momentum.
Resistance or disinclination to motion, action, or change.
"an entrenched bureaucracy's inertia."
That property of matter by which it tends when at rest to remain
so, and *when in motion to continue in motion* , and in the same
straight line or direction, *unless acted on by some external force* ;
-- sometimes called vis inertiæ. *The inertia of a body is proportional
to its mass* .
Thank you. It looks like my memory was cheating and I might’ve
been wrong about momentum being the same as inertia.
Never mind. As the Doctor himself once said: ‘Even I am
occasionally wrong about some things.
On 19/08/2025 4:29 am, solar penguin wrote:^^^^^<-Paedophile talker noted.
Daniel declared:
On 18/08/2025 12:23 am, solar penguin wrote:
The True Doctor <agamemnon@hello.to.NO_SPAM> wrote:
<Snip>
Since the Doctor left the linear induction corridor with exactly the >>>>> same momentum he entered it with there is no violation of any
conservation laws. Neutralising inertial probably requires some kind of >>>>> anti-gravity or negative mass, but then so does the TARDIS.
Inertia is momentum. They’re the same thing. If you’re
neutralising inertia you’re literally neutralising momentum.
That’s what inertia means.
From DuckDuckGo
inertia /ĭ-nûr′shə/
noun
The tendency of a body at rest to remain at rest or of a body in
straight line motion to stay in motion in a straight line unless acted
on by an outside force; the resistance of a body to changes in momentum. >>> Resistance or disinclination to motion, action, or change.
"an entrenched bureaucracy's inertia."
That property of matter by which it tends when at rest to remain
so, and *when in motion to continue in motion* , and in the same
straight line or direction, *unless acted on by some external force* ;
-- sometimes called vis inertiæ. *The inertia of a body is proportional >>> to its mass* .
Thank you. It looks like my memory was cheating and I might’ve
been wrong about momentum being the same as inertia.
Never mind. As the Doctor himself once said: ‘Even I am
occasionally wrong about some things.
Sorry!! When did Binky type that??
Oh!! Hang on! You mean one of the T.V. 'Doctors'!! ;-P
--
Daniel70
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 01:46:24 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,749 |