• Re: [OT] The Lion King (Was: [NEWS] BBC: "Doctor Who")

    From The Doctor@21:1/5 to Blueshirt on Mon Aug 25 13:51:07 2025
    In article <xn0p9yt4o60zdzw000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <xn0p9yo6t5u9hn1000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    All of the animals in The Lion King "live action" remake
    were CGI... in fact the whole film was computer generated.
    It was very good CGI, but not live at all.

    But plausibly realistic.

    That's not the point... it's misleading to call it live action
    when it's computer generated.

    Got your point.
    --
    Member - Liberal International This is doctor@nk.ca Ici doctor@nk.ca
    Yahweh, King & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising! Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism ;
    All I want to hear from JEsus Christ is WEll done Good and Faithful servant

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Blueshirt@21:1/5 to The Doctor on Mon Aug 25 13:49:48 2025
    The Doctor wrote:

    In article <xn0p9yo6t5u9hn1000@post.eweka.nl>,
    Blueshirt <blueshirt@indigo.news> wrote:

    All of the animals in The Lion King "live action" remake
    were CGI... in fact the whole film was computer generated.
    It was very good CGI, but not live at all.

    But plausibly realistic.

    That's not the point... it's misleading to call it live action
    when it's computer generated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)