On 5/10/22 2:52 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
Dilbert: Sapoisexual
https://dilbert.com/strip/2022-05-10
This is not going to a good place.
Lynn
I don’t offhand see why. “Sapiosexual” hasn’t made it into the OED yet,
but it’s been around for about twenty years, and I, myself, can testify
the phenomenon is real enough.
Dilbert: Sapoisexual
https://dilbert.com/strip/2022-05-10
This is not going to a good place.
Lynn
On 5/10/2022 6:34 PM, John W Kennedy wrote:
On 5/10/22 2:52 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
Dilbert: Sapoisexual
https://dilbert.com/strip/2022-05-10
This is not going to a good place.
Lynn
I don’t offhand see why. “Sapiosexual” hasn’t made it into the OED yet,
but it’s been around for about twenty years, and I, myself, can testify
the phenomenon is real enough.
Well if the OED only has 600,000 words in it, it is hardly the
definitive authority on the English language. Do I have to mention
James Nicoll and his 3,000,000 stolen words ?
https://www.oed.com/
However, the Urban Dictionary has seven pages of definitions.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Sapiosexual
And according to Merriam-Webster, the first known usage of Sapiosexual
was in 2004.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sapiosexual
On 5/10/22 2:52 PM, Lynn McGuire wrote:
Dilbert: Sapoisexual
https://dilbert.com/strip/2022-05-10
This is not going to a good place.
Lynn
I don’t offhand see why. “Sapiosexual” hasn’t made it into the OED yet,
but it’s been around for about twenty years, and I, myself, can testify
the phenomenon is real enough.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 163:22:49 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,510 |