• Re: Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door

    From Scott Lurndal@21:1/5 to Lynn McGuire on Wed Jan 8 22:11:49 2025
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
    https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 10 09:09:21 2025
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:11:49 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
    wrote:

    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
    https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    I call them "spend and spend". As opposed to the "tax and spend"
    Democrats fiscally-conservative Republicans used to attack.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational >non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

    The goal of the GOP since Ronnie has been to destroy Social Security.

    The National Debt is their primary weapon.

    They aren't going to reduce it -- they are going to use it to destroy
    Social Security, and probably Medicare as well.

    Because, after all, 1%-ers don't need those programs, so nobody else
    does either.

    The /real/ problem is that the Dems aren't going to reduce the
    National Debt either. Even if they collect money to do so, they will
    find something else to spend it on.

    Both Parties need severe wedgies. Republicans more than Democrats, but
    the Dems are by no means exempt.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to lynnmcguire5@gmail.com on Fri Jan 10 09:04:59 2025
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 15:58:06 -0600, Lynn McGuire
    <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> wrote:

    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
    https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our >savings including 401K, IRAs, and the cash in our mattresses. Hopefully
    not my gold crowns on my back teeth.

    All of /ours/, maybe, but certainly not any of the 1%-ers assets.

    Which go far beyond bank accounts, IRAs, 401s of any description, cash
    in mattresses. And might actually be enough to work.
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Fri Jan 10 18:05:59 2025
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On 1/10/2025 9:09 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:11:49 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
    wrote:

    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
    https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    I call them "spend and spend". As opposed to the "tax and spend"
    Democrats fiscally-conservative Republicans used to attack.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational
    non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid
    GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

    The goal of the GOP since Ronnie has been to destroy Social Security.

    The National Debt is their primary weapon.

    They aren't going to reduce it -- they are going to use it to destroy
    Social Security, and probably Medicare as well.

    Because, after all, 1%-ers don't need those programs, so nobody else
    does either.

    The /real/ problem is that the Dems aren't going to reduce the
    National Debt either. Even if they collect money to do so, they will
    find something else to spend it on.

    Both Parties need severe wedgies. Republicans more than Democrats, but
    the Dems are by no means exempt.

    Historically the Dems have reduced the national debt and balanced the
    budget MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more than the Repubs. The Repubs don't even try
    to do either.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul S Person@21:1/5 to dtravel@sonic.net on Sat Jan 11 09:00:57 2025
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:05:59 -0800, Dimensional Traveler
    <dtravel@sonic.net> wrote:

    On 1/10/2025 9:09 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
    On Wed, 08 Jan 2025 22:11:49 GMT, scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal)
    wrote:

    Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
    Pearls Before Swine: Uncle At The Door
    https://www.gocomics.com/pearlsbeforeswine/2025/01/08

    I figure before this nightmare is over, they will come for all of our

    It's your fault. Voting for for the spend and no tax republicans.

    I call them "spend and spend". As opposed to the "tax and spend"
    Democrats fiscally-conservative Republicans used to attack.

    One should reduce spending - before - reducing the income. Any rational >>> non-republican recognizes that. The "starve the beast" idiom is stupid >>> GOP thinking that obviously hasn't been effective.

    The goal of the GOP since Ronnie has been to destroy Social Security.

    The National Debt is their primary weapon.

    They aren't going to reduce it -- they are going to use it to destroy
    Social Security, and probably Medicare as well.

    Because, after all, 1%-ers don't need those programs, so nobody else
    does either.

    The /real/ problem is that the Dems aren't going to reduce the
    National Debt either. Even if they collect money to do so, they will
    find something else to spend it on.

    Both Parties need severe wedgies. Republicans more than Democrats, but
    the Dems are by no means exempt.

    Historically the Dems have reduced the national debt and balanced the
    budget MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more than the Repubs. The Repubs don't even try
    to do either.

    To be sure, but that was in the past.

    Clinton, our last fiscally-responisble President, left office with a
    /surplus/. His Republican successor found nothing better to do with it
    but reduce taxes on rich people. At least /that/ tax cut was funded.
    Unlike the one in 2017.

    And, let's face it, "reduce the Debt" just isn't as /sexy/ politically
    as "let's spend the money on [just about anything else]".
    --
    "Here lies the Tuscan poet Aretino,
    Who evil spoke of everyone but God,
    Giving as his excuse, 'I never knew him.'"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to Paul S Person on Sun Jan 12 00:41:35 2025
    XPost: rec.arts.sf.written

    On Sat, 11 Jan 2025, Paul S Person wrote:

    budget MUCH, MUCH, MUCH more than the Repubs. The Repubs don't even try
    to do either.

    To be sure, but that was in the past.

    Clinton, our last fiscally-responisble President, left office with a /surplus/. His Republican successor found nothing better to do with it
    but reduce taxes on rich people. At least /that/ tax cut was funded.
    Unlike the one in 2017.

    Reducing taxes is very erotic, and another way to say that is to give people their freedom back.

    Anyone who raises taxes is a homo, and that is a very bad thing.


    And, let's face it, "reduce the Debt" just isn't as /sexy/ politically
    as "let's spend the money on [just about anything else]".


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)