WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 1:48:36 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:
WTF?**Your memory is fucked.
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.
AOC should certainly cut the mustard.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-the-green-new-deal-is-not-about-climate-change/
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a
parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me
a parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Even an account called "Junk Science"?
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.
I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
On 6/02/2023 7:58 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 1:48:36 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:
WTF?**Your memory is fucked.
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.
AOC should certainly cut the mustard.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-the-green-new-deal-is-not-about-climate-change/**See if you can locate a more unbalanced news source. I bet you can't.
National Review is seriously unbalanced:
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a
parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.Even an account called "Junk Science"?
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
On 6/02/2023 9:20 am, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me
a parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Even an account called "Junk Science"?
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.
I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a**That's Twitter for you. There is no oversight. Twitter is useless to
decline. Troll bait.
me (and any sane human).
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 2:20:20 PM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:Even an account called "Junk Science"?
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a >>>> parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trend
making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?
ScottW
On 6/02/2023 7:58 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 1:48:36 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:
WTF?**Your memory is fucked.
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.
AOC should certainly cut the mustard.
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-the-green-new-deal-is-not-about-climate-change/**See if you can locate a more unbalanced news source. I bet you can't.
National Review is seriously unbalanced:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#Climate_change
--
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 7:58 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 1:48:36 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:**See if you can locate a more unbalanced news source. I bet you can't.
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:AOC should certainly cut the mustard.
WTF?**Your memory is fucked.
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say. >>>
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-the-green-new-deal-is-not-about-climate-change/
National Review is seriously unbalanced:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#Climate_change
--
Its about an actual quote. It had also been reported in the Washington POst.
The credible source is AOC's chief of staff,
You are implying either that the quote was inaccurate, or that AOC's COS was lying
The source is AOC's Chief of staff, you fucking lying idiot.
On 6/02/2023 10:47 am, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 2:20:20 PM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:Even an account called "Junk Science"?
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a >>>> parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say. >> I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trend
making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?
ScottW** ~150 years should do it:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:32:50 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 10:47 am, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 2:20:20 PM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:** ~150 years should do it:
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:Even an account called "Junk Science"?
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a >>>>>> parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say. >>>> I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trend
making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?
ScottW
Then you have no data on any rising temp trends now.
Sometimes you're really a moron. The whole AGW movement wants your membership revoked.
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 2:20:20 PM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:Even an account called "Junk Science"?
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a >>>> parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say.I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trend
making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?
On 6/02/2023 3:25 pm, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:32:50 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 10:47 am, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 2:20:20 PM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:** ~150 years should do it:
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:Even an account called "Junk Science"?
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a >>>>>> parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say. >>>> I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trend
making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?
ScottW
Then you have no data on any rising temp trends now.**Perhaps you are unable to understand trends: https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-temperature
https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/eight-warmest-years-record-witness-upsurge-climate-change-impacts
https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202213
It is clear to any sane person that we have witnessed a rising
temperature trend over the past 150 years.
On 2/5/23 5:47 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 2:20:20 PM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On 2/5/23 12:48 PM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:Even an account called "Junk Science"?
WTF?
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a >>>> parka while I can?
ScottW
**Your memory is fucked.
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say. >> I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trendHow about back to 1970?
making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:03:56 AM UTC-6, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 7:17:56 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
It helps the point I made. I believe his point was data over the last 150 yearsDoes that really help Trevor's 150 years to identify a trend?Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trendHow about back to 1970?
making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?
indicate an upward trend even if the last eight are plateaued as explained in the "Staircase of Denial" linked in the tweet I cited.
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 7:17:56 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a
decline. Troll bait.
Does that really help Trevor's 150 years to identify a trend?Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trendHow about back to 1970?
making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:30:15 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:03:56 AM UTC-6, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 7:17:56 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a >> decline. Troll bait.
So let's really look at the data you so grossly misrepresent.It helps the point I made. I believe his point was data over the last 150 yearsDoes that really help Trevor's 150 years to identify a trend?Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trend making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?How about back to 1970?
The early segment is a return to average from below normal.
Does that count. Then we have an extended period of normal ups and downs. Essentially flat. Not until '80 is there a crear up trend but thats
too short to call a trend according eggspert Trevor.
indicate an upward trend even if the last eight are plateaued as explained in the "Staircase of Denial" linked in the tweet I cited.And calling that a150 year trend would make any self-respecting stat analyst laugh at you.
ha ha hah.
On 6/02/2023 2:02 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 7:58 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 1:48:36 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:**See if you can locate a more unbalanced news source. I bet you can't.
AOC should certainly cut the mustard.WTF?**Your memory is fucked.
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say. >>>
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-the-green-new-deal-is-not-about-climate-change/
National Review is seriously unbalanced:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#Climate_change
--
Its about an actual quote. It had also been reported in the Washington POst.**OK. Post the link. The Washington Post has a good deal of credibility.
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:42:26 AM UTC-6, ScottW wrote:warming trend of 0.16°C per decade (red) can be used inappropriately to "cherrypick" short time periods that show a cooling trend simply because the endpoints are carefully chosen and the trend is dominated by short-term noise in the data (blue steps).
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:30:15 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:03:56 AM UTC-6, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 7:17:56 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature to claim a >> decline. Troll bait.
https://skepticalscience.com/graphics.php?g=47So let's really look at the data you so grossly misrepresent.It helps the point I made. I believe his point was data over the last 150 yearsDoes that really help Trevor's 150 years to identify a trend?Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a legit trend making all your model assumptions and predictions....suspect?How about back to 1970?
"One of the most common misunderstandings amongst climate contrarians is the difference between short-term noise and long-term signal. This animation shows how the same temperature data (green) that is used to determine the long-term global surface air
The early segment is a return to average from below normal.It's "too short" because you curtailed it.
Does that count. Then we have an extended period of normal ups and downs. Essentially flat. Not until '80 is there a crear up trend but thats
too short to call a trend according eggspert Trevor.
indicate an upward trend even if the last eight are plateaued as explained in the "Staircase of Denial" linked in the tweet I cited.And calling that a150 year trend would make any self-respecting stat analyst laugh at you.
ha ha hah.Choosing eight years over fifty or one hundred fifty is cherry-picking.
On 6/02/2023 2:02 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 7:58 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 1:48:36 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:**See if you can locate a more unbalanced news source. I bet you can't.
AOC should certainly cut the mustard.WTF?**Your memory is fucked.
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say. >>>
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-the-green-new-deal-is-not-about-climate-change/
National Review is seriously unbalanced:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#Climate_change
--
Its about an actual quote. It had also been reported in the Washington POst.**OK. Post the link. The Washington Post has a good deal of credibility.
The credible source is AOC's chief of staff,
You are implying either that the quote was inaccurate, or that AOC's COS was lying
The source is AOC's Chief of staff, you fucking lying idiot.**That would be: "You lying, fucking idiot."
Please brush up on your adopted language, you lying, fucking idiot.
--
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:37:52 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:42:26 AM UTC-6, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:30:15 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:https://skepticalscience.com/graphics.php?g=47
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:03:56 AM UTC-6, ScottWSo let's really look at the data you so grossly misrepresent.
wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 7:17:56 AM UTC-8, MINe109It helps the point I made. I believe his point was data over
wrote:
Does that really help Trevor's 150 years to identify aHow about back to 1970?I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature
to claim a decline. Troll bait.
Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a
legit trend making all your model assumptions and
predictions....suspect?
trend?
the last 150 years
"One of the most common misunderstandings amongst climate
contrarians is the difference between short-term noise and
long-term signal. This animation shows how the same temperature
data (green) that is used to determine the long-term global surface
air warming trend of 0.16°C per decade (red) can be used
inappropriately to "cherrypick" short time periods that show a
cooling trend simply because the endpoints are carefully chosen and
the trend is dominated by short-term noise in the data (blue
steps). Isn't it strange how six periods of cooling can add up to a
clear warming trend over the last 4 decades?"
The early segment is a return to average from below normal. DoesIt's "too short" because you curtailed it.
that count. Then we have an extended period of normal ups and
downs. Essentially flat. Not until '80 is there a crear up trend
but thats too short to call a trend according eggspert Trevor.
I curtailed it because the "trend" isn't arbitrary. It's defined by
the data.
Choosing eight years over fifty or one hundred fifty isindicate an upward trend even if the last eight are plateauedAnd calling that a150 year trend would make any self-respecting
as explained in the "Staircase of Denial" linked in the tweet I
cited.
stat analyst laugh at you.
ha ha hah.
cherry-picking.
How about 56 million? Guess what that "trend" is?
On 2/6/23 4:25 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:37:52 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 11:42:26 AM UTC-6, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 9:30:15 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:https://skepticalscience.com/graphics.php?g=47
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 10:03:56 AM UTC-6, ScottWSo let's really look at the data you so grossly misrepresent.
wrote:
On Monday, February 6, 2023 at 7:17:56 AM UTC-8, MINe109It helps the point I made. I believe his point was data over
wrote:
Does that really help Trevor's 150 years to identify aHow about back to 1970?I'm bored enough to click through...
Cherry picking the last 8 years of surface temperature
to claim a decline. Troll bait.
Cherry picking? How many years would it take to be a
legit trend making all your model assumptions and
predictions....suspect?
trend?
the last 150 years
"One of the most common misunderstandings amongst climate
contrarians is the difference between short-term noise and
long-term signal. This animation shows how the same temperature
data (green) that is used to determine the long-term global surface
air warming trend of 0.16°C per decade (red) can be used
inappropriately to "cherrypick" short time periods that show a
cooling trend simply because the endpoints are carefully chosen and
the trend is dominated by short-term noise in the data (blue
steps). Isn't it strange how six periods of cooling can add up to a
clear warming trend over the last 4 decades?"
The early segment is a return to average from below normal. DoesIt's "too short" because you curtailed it.
that count. Then we have an extended period of normal ups and
downs. Essentially flat. Not until '80 is there a crear up trend
but thats too short to call a trend according eggspert Trevor.
I curtailed it because the "trend" isn't arbitrary. It's defined byShows temps rising over time with short plateaus. I don't know why you
the data.
think the rise starts only in 1980. But, accepting that start, more skepticalscience:
As Figure 1 shows, over the last 37 years
On Tuesday, February 7, 2023 at 7:35:28 AM UTC-8, MINe109 wrote:
On 2/6/23 4:25 PM, ScottW wrote:
I curtailed it because the "trend" isn't arbitrary. It's defined byShows temps rising over time with short plateaus. I don't know why you
the data.
think the rise starts only in 1980. But, accepting that start, more
skepticalscience:
As Figure 1 shows, over the last 37 years
It's a horsehoe....you're proving my point.
On 6/02/2023 2:02 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 4:20:59 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 6/02/2023 7:58 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, February 5, 2023 at 1:48:36 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 6/02/2023 4:07 am, ScottW wrote:**See if you can locate a more unbalanced news source. I bet you can't.
AOC should certainly cut the mustard.WTF?**Your memory is fucked.
https://twitter.com/JunkScience/status/1613724250011242497
Is the old threat of impending Ice Age coming back? Should I get me a parka while I can?
ScottW
I do not, nor will I ever bother with Twitter.
Cite a credible source to justify whatever it is you are trying to say. >>>
https://www.nationalreview.com/news/aocs-chief-of-staff-admits-the-green-new-deal-is-not-about-climate-change/
National Review is seriously unbalanced:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Review#Climate_change
--
Its about an actual quote. It had also been reported in the Washington POst.**OK. Post the link. The Washington Post has a good deal of credibility.
The credible source is AOC's chief of staff,
You are implying either that the quote was inaccurate, or that AOC's COS was lying
The source is AOC's Chief of staff, you fucking lying idiot.**That would be: "You lying, fucking idiot."
Please brush up on your adopted language, you lying, fucking idiot.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
Are your hormones suppressed?
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:46:53 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottWI still perceive a strong amount of male toxicity in Trevor.
Are your hormones suppressed?
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
And you bang on about transgender people. Sheesh!
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world
around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you
came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one
fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you:
You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
Focus on what really matters. You are focussed in trivialities.
Just fuck off. You disgust me.
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW**Here's the thing about Australia:
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care.
* There are thousands of people dying in the Putin/Trump war in Ukraine. There are people being killed in Somalia. And, if that criminal, shit-for-brains, Trump is returned to power, then the Ukrainians can say goodbye to their lives.
* People are being locked up and tortured in China for the their religion/ethnicity.
* People are being tortured, locked up and killed in Myanmar.
* There is now more than 108 million forcibly displaced humans on this planet and 35 million refugees. A figure that is set to rise significantly. * 10,000 Americans are being shot to death each and every year, because gutless Republican politicians refuse to address the insane and
inadequate gun laws in the US.
And, lastly: The planet is heading into a global warming crisis that
will destroy many parts and peoples of this planet. It will exacerbate
the present refugee crisis that affects everyone.
And you bang on about transgender people. Sheesh!
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you
came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one
fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you:
You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
Focus on what really matters. You are focussed in trivialities.
Just fuck off. You disgust me.
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 10:29:33 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing
nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care.
* There are thousands of people dying in the Putin/Trump war in Ukraine.
There are people being killed in Somalia. And, if that criminal,
shit-for-brains, Trump is returned to power, then the Ukrainians can say
goodbye to their lives.
* People are being locked up and tortured in China for the their
religion/ethnicity.
* People are being tortured, locked up and killed in Myanmar.
* There is now more than 108 million forcibly displaced humans on this
planet and 35 million refugees. A figure that is set to rise significantly. >> * 10,000 Americans are being shot to death each and every year, because
gutless Republican politicians refuse to address the insane and
inadequate gun laws in the US.
And, lastly: The planet is heading into a global warming crisis that
will destroy many parts and peoples of this planet. It will exacerbate
the present refugee crisis that affects everyone.
And you bang on about transgender people. Sheesh!
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world
around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I
would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you
came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one
fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you:
You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
Focus on what really matters. You are focussed in trivialities.
Just fuck off. You disgust me.
What disgusts me are surgeries to remove healthy sexual organs from children, rendering them sterile, or unable to breast feed babies. What disgusts me is the idea that
children should be allowed to make such life altering decisions at such an early age,
without the maturity or knowledge necessary to make a rational informed consent
On 17/06/2023 3:23 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 10:29:33 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care.
* There are thousands of people dying in the Putin/Trump war in Ukraine. >> There are people being killed in Somalia. And, if that criminal,
shit-for-brains, Trump is returned to power, then the Ukrainians can say >> goodbye to their lives.
* People are being locked up and tortured in China for the their
religion/ethnicity.
* People are being tortured, locked up and killed in Myanmar.
* There is now more than 108 million forcibly displaced humans on this
planet and 35 million refugees. A figure that is set to rise significantly.
* 10,000 Americans are being shot to death each and every year, because >> gutless Republican politicians refuse to address the insane and
inadequate gun laws in the US.
And, lastly: The planet is heading into a global warming crisis that
will destroy many parts and peoples of this planet. It will exacerbate
the present refugee crisis that affects everyone.
And you bang on about transgender people. Sheesh!
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world
around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I >> would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you
came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one
fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you: >> You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
Focus on what really matters. You are focussed in trivialities.
Just fuck off. You disgust me.
What disgusts me are surgeries to remove healthy sexual organs from children,**So, all the other things, including the 10,000 Americans shot to death each and every year (plus as many as 10 times that figure, who are hospitalised with severe gunshot wounds) doesn't bother you?
rendering them sterile, or unable to breast feed babies. What disgusts me is the idea that
children should be allowed to make such life altering decisions at such an early age,
without the maturity or knowledge necessary to make a rational informed consent
You Republican slaves focus on such trivial matters.
Wake up and smell the coffee for fuck's sake.
--
And protecting children from mutilation is NOT a trivial matter.
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 4:10:03 AM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/06/2023 3:23 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 10:29:33 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care.
* There are thousands of people dying in the Putin/Trump war in Ukraine.
There are people being killed in Somalia. And, if that criminal,
shit-for-brains, Trump is returned to power, then the Ukrainians can say
goodbye to their lives.
* People are being locked up and tortured in China for the their
religion/ethnicity.
* People are being tortured, locked up and killed in Myanmar.
* There is now more than 108 million forcibly displaced humans on this >> planet and 35 million refugees. A figure that is set to rise significantly.
* 10,000 Americans are being shot to death each and every year, because >> gutless Republican politicians refuse to address the insane and
inadequate gun laws in the US.
And, lastly: The planet is heading into a global warming crisis that
will destroy many parts and peoples of this planet. It will exacerbate >> the present refugee crisis that affects everyone.
And you bang on about transgender people. Sheesh!
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world >> around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I
would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you
came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one
fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you: >> You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
Focus on what really matters. You are focussed in trivialities.
Just fuck off. You disgust me.
What disgusts me are surgeries to remove healthy sexual organs from children,**So, all the other things, including the 10,000 Americans shot to death each and every year (plus as many as 10 times that figure, who are hospitalised with severe gunshot wounds) doesn't bother you?
rendering them sterile, or unable to breast feed babies. What disgusts me is the idea that
children should be allowed to make such life altering decisions at such an early age,
without the maturity or knowledge necessary to make a rational informed consent
You Republican slaves focus on such trivial matters.
Wake up and smell the coffee for fuck's sake.
--
Yes, it bothers me. That is why I advocate for stiff sentences for using guns in felonies, and for
stiff sentences for illegal carrying of firearms by convicted felons. And i oppose decriminalization
of many felonies into misdemeanors. A convicted felon may not possess a gun, but a
on a misdemeanor conviction, one can. The trick is properly classifying and differentiating felonies from misdemeanors.
And protecting children from mutilation is NOT a trivial matter.
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW**Here's the thing about Australia:
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman.
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you
came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one
fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you:
You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing
nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman.
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports.
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world
around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I
would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you
came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one
fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you:
You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
and with that, I will sleep well tonight assured I'm on the right track.
ScottW
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 4:10:03 AM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/06/2023 3:23 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 10:29:33 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:**So, all the other things, including the 10,000 Americans shot to death
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >>>> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care.
* There are thousands of people dying in the Putin/Trump war in Ukraine. >>>> There are people being killed in Somalia. And, if that criminal,
shit-for-brains, Trump is returned to power, then the Ukrainians can say >>>> goodbye to their lives.
* People are being locked up and tortured in China for the their
religion/ethnicity.
* People are being tortured, locked up and killed in Myanmar.
* There is now more than 108 million forcibly displaced humans on this >>>> planet and 35 million refugees. A figure that is set to rise significantly.
* 10,000 Americans are being shot to death each and every year, because >>>> gutless Republican politicians refuse to address the insane and
inadequate gun laws in the US.
And, lastly: The planet is heading into a global warming crisis that
will destroy many parts and peoples of this planet. It will exacerbate >>>> the present refugee crisis that affects everyone.
And you bang on about transgender people. Sheesh!
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world >>>> around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I >>>> would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you
came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one
fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you: >>>> You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
Focus on what really matters. You are focussed in trivialities.
Just fuck off. You disgust me.
What disgusts me are surgeries to remove healthy sexual organs from children,
rendering them sterile, or unable to breast feed babies. What disgusts me is the idea that
children should be allowed to make such life altering decisions at such an early age,
without the maturity or knowledge necessary to make a rational informed consent
each and every year (plus as many as 10 times that figure, who are
hospitalised with severe gunshot wounds) doesn't bother you?
You Republican slaves focus on such trivial matters.
Wake up and smell the coffee for fuck's sake.
--
Yes, it bothers me.
stiff sentences for illegal carrying of firearms by convicted felons. And i oppose decriminalization
of many felonies into misdemeanors. A convicted felon may not possess a gun, but a
on a misdemeanor conviction, one can. The trick is properly classifying and differentiating felonies from misdemeanors.
And protecting children from mutilation is NOT a trivial matter.
On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman.
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports.**I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued ignorance of important matters.
On 18/06/2023 1:42 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 4:10:03 AM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 17/06/2023 3:23 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 10:29:33 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:**So, all the other things, including the 10,000 Americans shot to death >> each and every year (plus as many as 10 times that figure, who are
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing >>>> nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >>>> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care.
* There are thousands of people dying in the Putin/Trump war in Ukraine.
There are people being killed in Somalia. And, if that criminal,
shit-for-brains, Trump is returned to power, then the Ukrainians can say
goodbye to their lives.
* People are being locked up and tortured in China for the their
religion/ethnicity.
* People are being tortured, locked up and killed in Myanmar.
* There is now more than 108 million forcibly displaced humans on this >>>> planet and 35 million refugees. A figure that is set to rise significantly.
* 10,000 Americans are being shot to death each and every year, because >>>> gutless Republican politicians refuse to address the insane and
inadequate gun laws in the US.
And, lastly: The planet is heading into a global warming crisis that >>>> will destroy many parts and peoples of this planet. It will exacerbate >>>> the present refugee crisis that affects everyone.
And you bang on about transgender people. Sheesh!
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world >>>> around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I
would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you >>>> came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one >>>> fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you: >>>> You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
Focus on what really matters. You are focussed in trivialities.
Just fuck off. You disgust me.
What disgusts me are surgeries to remove healthy sexual organs from children,
rendering them sterile, or unable to breast feed babies. What disgusts me is the idea that
children should be allowed to make such life altering decisions at such an early age,
without the maturity or knowledge necessary to make a rational informed consent
hospitalised with severe gunshot wounds) doesn't bother you?
You Republican slaves focus on such trivial matters.
Wake up and smell the coffee for fuck's sake.
--
Yes, it bothers me.**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
Yes, it bothers me.**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
It doesn't bother you one bit. You are a liar and a hypocrite. If you
really cared, then you would vote for politicians who seek to end this
insane carnage.
And protecting children from mutilation is NOT a trivial matter.**Mutilating children is a criminal offence. The laws are already in
place.
insane carnage caused by the easy availability of firearms?
Hint: That means NOT voting for Republicans.
A vote for Republicans means you tacitly approve of the slaughter of
your fellow Americans.
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >>>> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman.
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports.
ignorance of important matters.
It's not trivial to the victims.
ScottW
I see law and order in decline around the country
On 6/17/23 5:25 PM, ScottW wrote:
I see law and order in decline around the countryCrime's down, dude.
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:15:42 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 1:42 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 4:10:03 AM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
On 17/06/2023 3:23 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 10:29:33 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:**So, all the other things, including the 10,000 Americans shot to death >>>> each and every year (plus as many as 10 times that figure, who are
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing >>>>>> nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >>>>>> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care.
* There are thousands of people dying in the Putin/Trump war in Ukraine. >>>>>> There are people being killed in Somalia. And, if that criminal,
shit-for-brains, Trump is returned to power, then the Ukrainians can say >>>>>> goodbye to their lives.
* People are being locked up and tortured in China for the their
religion/ethnicity.
* People are being tortured, locked up and killed in Myanmar.
* There is now more than 108 million forcibly displaced humans on this >>>>>> planet and 35 million refugees. A figure that is set to rise significantly.
* 10,000 Americans are being shot to death each and every year, because >>>>>> gutless Republican politicians refuse to address the insane and
inadequate gun laws in the US.
And, lastly: The planet is heading into a global warming crisis that >>>>>> will destroy many parts and peoples of this planet. It will exacerbate >>>>>> the present refugee crisis that affects everyone.
And you bang on about transgender people. Sheesh!
FUCK OFF, you fucking moron. Get a life and grow up. Look at the world >>>>>> around you. I genuinely feel that if you were standing in front of me, I >>>>>> would be inclined to smash your head against a nearby wall until you >>>>>> came to your senses. And I am not a violent person. I've been in one >>>>>> fist fight in my entire life. I was 11 years old. But, let me tell you: >>>>>> You are a phenomenally ignorant cunt of a human.
Focus on what really matters. You are focussed in trivialities.
Just fuck off. You disgust me.
What disgusts me are surgeries to remove healthy sexual organs from children,
rendering them sterile, or unable to breast feed babies. What disgusts me is the idea that
children should be allowed to make such life altering decisions at such an early age,
without the maturity or knowledge necessary to make a rational informed consent
hospitalised with severe gunshot wounds) doesn't bother you?
You Republican slaves focus on such trivial matters.
Wake up and smell the coffee for fuck's sake.
--
Yes, it bothers me.
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
and I remain pro constitution.
and as I see law and order in decline around the country.
and not be reliant on gov't that is failing.
ScottW
That means the US taxpayer is forking out TWENTY FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS
each and every year.
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 6:52:16 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/17/23 5:25 PM, ScottW wrote:
I see law and order in decline around the countryCrime's down, dude.
by definition. Thats what happens when you decriminalize everything,
there is no more crime!
That's what happens when you defund police, you have horrible police response,
so citizens lose faith and don't bother to report it. That's what
happens when don't prosecute criminals. People lose faith\in the
system and don't report bad actors.
where crime is still prosecuted, those communities are safe, Where
crime is not enforced, like in Portland, San Francisco and NYC, crime
is rampant.
On 18/06/2023 8:23 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:ignorance of important matters.
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing >>>> nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >>>> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman.
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports. >> **I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued
It's not trivial to the victims.
ScottW
**I agree. The murder of 10,000 Americans and the injury of many more,
from gunshot is not trivial for victims and their families.
Moreover (and this point will make your Republican, black, cold,
uncaring heart take note) is the cost to every single American taxpayer:
https://giffords.org/blog/2020/01/every-murder-costs-taxpayers-millions-of-dollars-and-thats-on-top-of-the-tragic-human-cost-blog/
and I remain pro constitution.**Good for you. Which part?
The part where it was written by slave owners and slavery was legal?
Or the part where only white, male, property owners were allowed to vote?
Or the 18th?
Or the part of the 2nd, where gun loons conveniently ignore the part
where is clearly states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to
the security of a free State"
The real facts are simple. The 2nd amendment was written at a time when
the young nation was threatened by vicious natives, dangerous wild
animals roamed free and, critically, re-loading times were measured in
tens of seconds (not thousandths of a second) and accuracy was poor. A complete re-write of the 2nd is long overdue to reflect reality today. Naturally, the Republicans oppose this.
and as I see law and order in decline around the country.**Can you prove that?
...I want the option to defend myself
and not be reliant on gov't that is failing.
ScottW**Can you prove that you can defend yourself? There is
abundant evidence that arming the population has the reverse effect.
More guns = more dead Americans.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 7:14:08 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
**Good for you. Which part?
and I remain pro constitution.
The part where it was written by slave owners and slavery was legal?
Or the part where only white, male, property owners were allowed to vote?
Or the 18th?
Those were repealed a long time ago.
The people who wrote it lived in their day, in the culture of their time,
a time in which our more modern ideals were not in existence.
In the context of where society was at that time, it is magnificent
document and very radical and forward thinking. I established a type of government not
yet seen in this world, and was a great improvement over whatever else was prevalent.
I feel so sorry for you that you hate Wmerica nad hate the US Constitution so much.
Since its so bad here, please do not come back here to vosit us a second time Stay down under.
Or the part of the 2nd, where gun loons conveniently ignore the part
where is clearly states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to
the security of a free State"
that's a preamble, not a requirement of validity. you lose.
The real facts are simple. The 2nd amendment was written at a time when
the young nation was threatened by vicious natives, dangerous wild
animals roamed free and, critically, re-loading times were measured in
tens of seconds (not thousandths of a second) and accuracy was poor. A
complete re-write of the 2nd is long overdue to reflect reality today.
Naturally, the Republicans oppose this.
It was written at a time when police were not in existence and people
had to fend for themselves. Tough we have police today, responses are measured
in tens of minutes, so people still require the means to defend themselves.
Even today, dangerous wild animals still roam free. They are called urban criminals.
**Can you prove that?
and as I see law and order in decline around the country.
I can see it, also
Too bad you are blind to it,
...I want the option to defend myself
and not be reliant on gov't that is failing.**Can you prove that you can defend yourself? There is
ScottW
abundant evidence that arming the population has the reverse effect.
More guns = more dead Americans.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:39:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 8:23 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing >>>>>> nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing >>>>>> nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman.
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports. >>>> **I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued >>>> ignorance of important matters.
It's not trivial to the victims.
ScottW
**I agree. The murder of 10,000 Americans and the injury of many more,
from gunshot is not trivial for victims and their families.
Tell it to families in Minneapolis where policing has nearly collapsed and people
are cowering in their homes while gunfire rattles their windows.
Go tell them they have to surrender their only defense.
Nor is it trivial for a HS female athlete competing for an athletic scholarship
to be denied by a male.
Moreover (and this point will make your Republican, black, cold,
uncaring heart take note) is the cost to every single American taxpayer:
https://giffords.org/blog/2020/01/every-murder-costs-taxpayers-millions-of-dollars-and-thats-on-top-of-the-tragic-human-cost-blog/
This is moronic. First...that's Stockton only. Even a moron wouldn't claim that extrapolates to the whole country.
They're taking the sunk cost of a police force and dividing by their murders and assuming no murders means they won't need the cops forforce. I guess you just ignore the remaining 40% of murders.
anything.
Are you really that stupid to buy this crap. Stockton's entire police budget is 158M$. The moron you cite claims they can save 50M$ or 1/3 of the total police cost by reducing murders by 20%. Hey...reduce it by 60% and you can wipe out the entire
You say some dumb shit often....but this is beyond stupid.
ScottW
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
Yes, it bothers me.
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
Dems decriminalize behavior, reduce felonies to misdemeanors.
Dems do not enforce gun laws already on the books.
Dems defund police departments.
Dems demoralize police departments with all of the above, plus advocate
limiting immunity.
You say Reps oppose gun control laws;
Law enforcement against criminals will accomplish much better results.
can do something about that. worrying about stocks and magazines, and long guns
won't have much effect. The problem is criminals using handguns.
Good luck collecting the ones on the street and trying to ban handguns. Not gonna happen.
Locking up more violent criminals with longer sentences, that's the easy solution,
It doesn't bother you one bit. You are a liar and a hypocrite. If you
really cared, then you would vote for politicians who seek to end this
insane carnage.
I do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I vote for tough on crime Republicans running against soft on crime democrats.s
And protecting children from mutilation is NOT a trivial matter.**Mutilating children is a criminal offence. The laws are already in
place.
Gender based mutilations are NOT criminal, except just recently, in
only a few states,
Now, why don't you vote for the people who seek to reduce the
insane carnage caused by the easy availability of firearms?
Hint: That means NOT voting for Republicans.
Wrong. democrats are the ones aiding and abetting violent crime.
A vote for Republicans means you tacitly approve of the slaughter of
your fellow Americans.
Democrats let violet criminals off the hook, particularly if they are illegal aliens.
On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
Yes, it bothers me.
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
On 18/06/2023 11:17 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:39:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 8:23 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:**I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued >>>> ignorance of important matters.
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing >>>>>> nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing
nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman.
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports.
It's not trivial to the victims.
ScottW
**I agree. The murder of 10,000 Americans and the injury of many more,
from gunshot is not trivial for victims and their families.
Tell it to families in Minneapolis where policing has nearly collapsed and people**I never said they did. I said that US gun laws are a joke. A violent criminal can easily obtain a firearm from a legal gun owner in may US jurisdictions and the seller faces no repercussions.
are cowering in their homes while gunfire rattles their windows.
Go tell them they have to surrender their only defense.
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:16:20 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:
**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight >>>> tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control >>>> laws.
Yes, it bothers me.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
All you prove with claptrap like this is your own ignorance.
You rage endlessly over handgun deaths but sit quietly while fentanyl kills tens of thousands more and the drugs continue to flow easily through Bidens open borders.
ScottW
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:29:15 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 11:17 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:39:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**I never said they did. I said that US gun laws are a joke. A violent
On 18/06/2023 8:23 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing >>>>>>>> nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing
nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman.
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports. >>>>>> **I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued >>>>>> ignorance of important matters.
It's not trivial to the victims.
ScottW
**I agree. The murder of 10,000 Americans and the injury of many more, >>>> from gunshot is not trivial for victims and their families.
Tell it to families in Minneapolis where policing has nearly collapsed and people
are cowering in their homes while gunfire rattles their windows.
Go tell them they have to surrender their only defense.
criminal can easily obtain a firearm from a legal gun owner in may US
jurisdictions and the seller faces no repercussions.
And under dem DA's...neither does the violent criminal.
But for the record...knowingly selling a gun to felon is a federal offense and as such there is no "jurisdiction" where this is not punishable.
You remain an ignorant blowhard.
On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
Yes, it bothers me.
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
Dems decriminalize behavior, reduce felonies to misdemeanors.**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
Dems do not enforce gun laws already on the books.**US gun laws are hopelessly inadequate and many are unenforceable.
Examine Australia's gun laws, if you genuinely want to reduce the
homicide and injury rates via gunshot. If you are happy to see 10,000 of your fellow Americans shot to death each and every year, then do
absolutely nothing. Keep voting for the NRA slaves in the Republican Party.
Dems defund police departments.
**Prove it. Cite your evidence. Prove that Republicans did not.
Dems demoralize police departments with all of the above, plus advocate limiting immunity.**Prove it.
You say Reps oppose gun control laws;**_I_ don't say it. The facts are in evidence:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/26/us/republicans-gun-control.html
So, keep voting for the arseholes who ensure that Americans keep being murdered via gunshot.
You dumb shit-for-brains.
I say Dems oppose criminal control laws.
**Let me carefully restate: We are discussing the fact that 10,000
Americans are murdered each year via gunshot and the fact that
Republican politicians (including your hero: Trump/Putin) vigorously
oppose any changes to the existing gun laws.
Law enforcement against criminals will accomplish much better results.**Really? How would that work with:
* The Las Vegas shooting in 2017? The perp was not a criminal
* The Orlando nightclub shooting in 2016?
* The Virginia Tech shooting.
* Sandy Hook?
Etc, etc.
Few of the individuals concerned were criminals and all were able to
easily access firearms that have no place in modern society.
Society
can do something about that. worrying about stocks and magazines, and long guns**No. The problem is that ANYONE (criminals or not) can easily obtain
won't have much effect. The problem is criminals using handguns.
any kind of firearm they wish. Including handguns.
Good luck collecting the ones on the street and trying to ban handguns. Not gonna happen.**What about the people with no criminal history who kill Americans? Are they OK?
Locking up more violent criminals with longer sentences, that's the easy solution,
It doesn't bother you one bit. You are a liar and a hypocrite. If you
really cared, then you would vote for politicians who seek to end this
insane carnage.
I do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I vote for tough on crime Republicans running against soft on crime democrats.s**No. You vote for the NRA stooges, who ensure that guns are easily available to anyone. Including criminals, children and those who should
not be allowed to own firearms.
And protecting children from mutilation is NOT a trivial matter.**Mutilating children is a criminal offence. The laws are already in
place.
Gender based mutilations are NOT criminal, except just recently, in
only a few states,
**I will state, once more, very clearly: Mutilating children is already
a criminal offence.
Now, why don't you vote for the people who seek to reduce the
insane carnage caused by the easy availability of firearms?
Hint: That means NOT voting for Republicans.
Wrong. democrats are the ones aiding and abetting violent crime.**I am correct:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/26/us/republicans-gun-control.html
It is the Republicans who are the NRA stooges.
A vote for Republicans means you tacitly approve of the slaughter of
your fellow Americans.
Democrats let violet criminals off the hook, particularly if they are illegal aliens.**Republicans ensure that ANYONE (including violent criminals) can
easily obtain firearms.
On 19/06/2023 2:38 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:16:20 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:
**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight >>>> tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control >>>> laws.
Yes, it bothers me.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
All you prove with claptrap like this is your own ignorance.
You rage endlessly over handgun deaths but sit quietly while fentanyl kills
tens of thousands more and the drugs continue to flow easily through Bidens open borders.
ScottW
**A fentanyl death is a self-administered one. You'll note that I have
VERY carefully omitted the suicide rate associated with firearms. I am firmly of the belief that any human may choose the timing of their death.
--
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:12:07 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 19/06/2023 2:38 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:16:20 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:**A fentanyl death is a self-administered one. You'll note that I have
**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight >>>>>> tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control >>>>>> laws.
Yes, it bothers me.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
All you prove with claptrap like this is your own ignorance.
You rage endlessly over handgun deaths but sit quietly while fentanyl kills >>> tens of thousands more and the drugs continue to flow easily through Bidens open borders.
ScottW
VERY carefully omitted the suicide rate associated with firearms. I am
firmly of the belief that any human may choose the timing of their death.
--
Self administered, yes
but not usually a suicide
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 2:16:20 AM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:
**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight >>>> tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control >>>> laws.
Yes, it bothers me.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
Dems decriminalize behavior, reduce felonies to misdemeanors.**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
You don't live here. If you did, you would realize that it is a well known fact.
Proof not required
Sky is blue, proof not required.
self evident.
Dems do not enforce gun laws already on the books.**US gun laws are hopelessly inadequate and many are unenforceable.
Examine Australia's gun laws, if you genuinely want to reduce the
homicide and injury rates via gunshot. If you are happy to see 10,000 of
your fellow Americans shot to death each and every year, then do
absolutely nothing. Keep voting for the NRA slaves in the Republican Party.
That is your culture, not ours.
We have over 350 million guns already in citizen's hands.
and we have a violent subculture.
Focusing on gun sales is not going to change any of that.
Dems defund police departments.
**Prove it. Cite your evidence. Prove that Republicans did not.
THE SKY IS BLUE
proof not required.
Dems demoralize police departments with all of the above, plus advocate**Prove it.
limiting immunity.
The sky is blue
grass is green
the oceans contain a lot of water
proof not required.
**_I_ don't say it. The facts are in evidence:
You say Reps oppose gun control laws;
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/26/us/republicans-gun-control.html
So, keep voting for the arseholes who ensure that Americans keep being
murdered via gunshot.
Criminals pull the trigger
Triggers don't pull themselves,
You dumb shit-for-brains.
I say Dems oppose criminal control laws.
**Let me carefully restate: We are discussing the fact that 10,000
Americans are murdered each year via gunshot and the fact that
Republican politicians (including your hero: Trump/Putin) vigorously
oppose any changes to the existing gun laws.
Because there are 350 million guns out there.
ONLY 1 OUT OF EVERY 35,000 GUNS KILLS SOMEBODY
Law enforcement against criminals will accomplish much better results.**Really? How would that work with:
* The Las Vegas shooting in 2017? The perp was not a criminal
* The Orlando nightclub shooting in 2016?
* The Virginia Tech shooting.
* Sandy Hook?
Etc, etc.
Those crimes involved rifles.
Most gun deaths in the USA, by a very wide margin, are from handguns.
https://www.statista.com/statistics/195325/murder-victims-in-the-us-by-weapon-used/
only 447 deaths by rifle.
Few of the individuals concerned were criminals and all were able to
easily access firearms that have no place in modern society.
Society
can do something about that. worrying about stocks and magazines, and long guns**No. The problem is that ANYONE (criminals or not) can easily obtain
won't have much effect. The problem is criminals using handguns.
any kind of firearm they wish. Including handguns.
Good luck collecting the ones on the street and trying to ban handguns. Not gonna happen.**What about the people with no criminal history who kill Americans? Are
Locking up more violent criminals with longer sentences, that's the easy solution,
they OK?
Good luck predicting who they might be.
In this country, we leave people alone until after they commit a crime.
It doesn't bother you one bit. You are a liar and a hypocrite. If you
really cared, then you would vote for politicians who seek to end this >>>> insane carnage.
I do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I vote for politicians who would lock up violent criminals.
I do!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I vote for tough on crime Republicans running against >>> soft on crime democrats.s**No. You vote for the NRA stooges, who ensure that guns are easily
available to anyone. Including criminals, children and those who should
not be allowed to own firearms.
Nor should children be allowed to consent to have their penises or breasts removed.
**I will state, once more, very clearly: Mutilating children is alreadyAnd protecting children from mutilation is NOT a trivial matter.**Mutilating children is a criminal offence. The laws are already in
place.
Gender based mutilations are NOT criminal, except just recently, in
only a few states,
a criminal offence.
I will state very clearly that in almost all states, it is not.
Gender affirming surgery for children includes breast or penis removal,
which is mutilation, and in some states, it is an approved practice.
**I am correct:
Now, why don't you vote for the people who seek to reduce the
insane carnage caused by the easy availability of firearms?
Hint: That means NOT voting for Republicans.
Wrong. democrats are the ones aiding and abetting violent crime.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/26/us/republicans-gun-control.html
It is the Republicans who are the NRA stooges.
The NRA is not the problem,
A vote for Republicans means you tacitly approve of the slaughter of
your fellow Americans.
No it means I protect Americans from criminals.
Democrats let violet criminals off the hook, particularly if they are illegal aliens.**Republicans ensure that ANYONE (including violent criminals) can
easily obtain firearms.
Nononono.
Violent criminals (convicted felons) are not allowed to own firearms
On 19/06/2023 2:43 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:29:15 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 11:17 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:39:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 18/06/2023 8:23 am, ScottW wrote:**I never said they did. I said that US gun laws are a joke. A violent
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:**I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports.Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing
nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman. >>>>>>>
ignorance of important matters.
It's not trivial to the victims.
ScottW
**I agree. The murder of 10,000 Americans and the injury of many more, >>>> from gunshot is not trivial for victims and their families.
Tell it to families in Minneapolis where policing has nearly collapsed and people
are cowering in their homes while gunfire rattles their windows.
Go tell them they have to surrender their only defense.
criminal can easily obtain a firearm from a legal gun owner in may US
jurisdictions and the seller faces no repercussions.
And under dem DA's...neither does the violent criminal.**And, here's the thing, you moron: Various Democrat presidents have attempted to introduce tougher gun laws, but have been thwarted by Republican Senates.
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 12:09:48 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 19/06/2023 2:43 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:29:15 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 18/06/2023 11:17 am, ScottW wrote:**And, here's the thing, you moron: Various Democrat presidents have
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:39:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 18/06/2023 8:23 am, ScottW wrote:**I never said they did. I said that US gun laws are a joke. A violent >>>> criminal can easily obtain a firearm from a legal gun owner in may US
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:**I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued >>>>>>>> ignorance of important matters.
Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports.Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing >>>>>>>>>> nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing
nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman. >>>>>>>>>
It's not trivial to the victims.
ScottW
**I agree. The murder of 10,000 Americans and the injury of many more, >>>>>> from gunshot is not trivial for victims and their families.
Tell it to families in Minneapolis where policing has nearly collapsed and people
are cowering in their homes while gunfire rattles their windows.
Go tell them they have to surrender their only defense.
jurisdictions and the seller faces no repercussions.
And under dem DA's...neither does the violent criminal.
attempted to introduce tougher gun laws, but have been thwarted by
Republican Senates.
Obama had the trifecta. What did he do with it?
ScottW
On 19/06/2023 5:25 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:12:07 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 19/06/2023 2:38 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:16:20 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:**A fentanyl death is a self-administered one. You'll note that I have
**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
Yes, it bothers me.
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
All you prove with claptrap like this is your own ignorance.
You rage endlessly over handgun deaths but sit quietly while fentanyl kills
tens of thousands more and the drugs continue to flow easily through Bidens open borders.
ScottW
VERY carefully omitted the suicide rate associated with firearms. I am
firmly of the belief that any human may choose the timing of their death. >> --
Self administered, yes**Again: I have no problem with a self-administered death. Fentanyl
but not usually a suicide
users are well aware of how deadly the stuff is. Same as tobacco,
alcohol and other drugs.
On 19/06/2023 7:42 am, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 12:09:48 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 19/06/2023 2:43 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:29:15 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 18/06/2023 11:17 am, ScottW wrote:**And, here's the thing, you moron: Various Democrat presidents have
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:39:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 18/06/2023 8:23 am, ScottW wrote:**I never said they did. I said that US gun laws are a joke. A violent >>>> criminal can easily obtain a firearm from a legal gun owner in may US >>>> jurisdictions and the seller faces no repercussions.
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 3:11:04 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 18/06/2023 7:29 am, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:29:33 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**I note your continued obsession with trivialities and your continued
On 17/06/2023 9:46 am, ScottW wrote:Note the edit for truth, justice, and the protection of women's sports.
Are your hormones suppressed?**Here's the thing about Australia:
You might have a new career opportunity.
https://redstate.com/benkew/2023/06/16/australia-ruins-womens-sports-will-allow-men-to-compete-n762650
ScottW
We don't give a shit about unimportant issues that bother right wing
nut-jobs. Australians are a very inclusive bunch. With a few right wing
nut-job exceptions though.
We just don't care if our women get a beat down by a transman. >>>>>>>>>
ignorance of important matters.
It's not trivial to the victims.
ScottW
**I agree. The murder of 10,000 Americans and the injury of many more,
from gunshot is not trivial for victims and their families.
Tell it to families in Minneapolis where policing has nearly collapsed and people
are cowering in their homes while gunfire rattles their windows.
Go tell them they have to surrender their only defense.
And under dem DA's...neither does the violent criminal.
attempted to introduce tougher gun laws, but have been thwarted by
Republican Senates.
Obama had the trifecta. What did he do with it?
ScottW
** https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/16/obama-gun-control-227625/
https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2019/08/16/obama-gun-control-227625/
"In his first term, Obama did not push for gun control measures after
the fatal mass shootings at Fort Hood, Texas; an Aurora, Colorado,
movie theater; and the Tucson, Arizona supermarket that cut short
Rep. Gabby Giffords' congressional career. He continued to keep quiet
on gun control in the 2012 presidential campaign as well."
Fact number two....Biden also had the trifecta his first two years.
He also did nothing on gun control just like Obama.
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 1:08:55 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 19/06/2023 5:25 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:12:07 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:**Again: I have no problem with a self-administered death. Fentanyl
On 19/06/2023 2:38 am, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:16:20 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:**A fentanyl death is a self-administered one. You'll note that I have >>>> VERY carefully omitted the suicide rate associated with firearms. I am >>>> firmly of the belief that any human may choose the timing of their death. >>>> --
**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight >>>>>>>> tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control >>>>>>>> laws.
Yes, it bothers me.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
All you prove with claptrap like this is your own ignorance.
You rage endlessly over handgun deaths but sit quietly while fentanyl kills
tens of thousands more and the drugs continue to flow easily through Bidens open borders.
ScottW
Self administered, yes
but not usually a suicide
users are well aware of how deadly the stuff is. Same as tobacco,
alcohol and other drugs.
Fentanyl is too often sold as a Xanax or other popular prescription.
It's even showing up in cannabis prodcuts.
Everyone who dies of fentanyl overdose doesn't know they were getting it.
ScottW
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 1:03:09 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 1:54 am, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 1:08:55 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**People who buy illegal drugs are no different to smokers. The risks
On 19/06/2023 5:25 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:12:07 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 19/06/2023 2:38 am, ScottW wrote:**Again: I have no problem with a self-administered death. Fentanyl
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:16:20 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:**A fentanyl death is a self-administered one. You'll note that I have >>>>>> VERY carefully omitted the suicide rate associated with firearms. I am >>>>>> firmly of the belief that any human may choose the timing of their death.
**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
Yes, it bothers me.
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
All you prove with claptrap like this is your own ignorance.
You rage endlessly over handgun deaths but sit quietly while fentanyl kills
tens of thousands more and the drugs continue to flow easily through Bidens open borders.
ScottW
--
Self administered, yes
but not usually a suicide
users are well aware of how deadly the stuff is. Same as tobacco,
alcohol and other drugs.
Fentanyl is too often sold as a Xanax or other popular prescription.
It's even showing up in cannabis prodcuts.
Everyone who dies of fentanyl overdose doesn't know they were getting it. >>>
ScottW
are well known and well publicised. IOW: You can't protect people from
their own stupidity.
Hmmm, the harm reduction advocates among us will find you a heartless heathen.
ScottW
On 20/06/2023 1:54 am, ScottW wrote:
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 1:08:55 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 19/06/2023 5:25 am, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:12:07 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 19/06/2023 2:38 am, ScottW wrote:**Again: I have no problem with a self-administered death. Fentanyl
On Saturday, June 17, 2023 at 11:16:20 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**A fentanyl death is a self-administered one. You'll note that I have >>>> VERY carefully omitted the suicide rate associated with firearms. I am >>>> firmly of the belief that any human may choose the timing of their death.
On 18/06/2023 8:32 am, Art Sackman wrote:
**Prove it. Cite your evidence.
**Then why would you vote Republican? It is the Republicans that fight
Yes, it bothers me.
tooth and nail against good, sensible, strong and cohesive gun control
laws.
Dems elect soft on crime Soros backed prosecutors who refuse to enforce criminal laws.
All you prove with claptrap like this is your own ignorance.
You rage endlessly over handgun deaths but sit quietly while fentanyl kills
tens of thousands more and the drugs continue to flow easily through Bidens open borders.
ScottW
--
Self administered, yes
but not usually a suicide
users are well aware of how deadly the stuff is. Same as tobacco,
alcohol and other drugs.
Fentanyl is too often sold as a Xanax or other popular prescription.
It's even showing up in cannabis prodcuts.
Everyone who dies of fentanyl overdose doesn't know they were getting it.
ScottW**People who buy illegal drugs are no different to smokers. The risks
are well known and well publicised. IOW: You can't protect people from
their own stupidity.
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the
demands of the NRA.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the
demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
What kind of fascist dictator wannabe are you?
ScottW
On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the
demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their interests.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the
demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their
interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their
interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further
the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
--
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 9:47:14 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further
On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their >>>> interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
--
Majority of Americans?
"A recent Politico/Morning Consult poll found that only 24% of voters favor repealing the Second Amendment. While 40% of Democrats said they want to repeal it, only 11% of Republicans and 19% of independents do."
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/fairness-justice/what-does-the-polling-say-about-gun-control\
https://heartland.org/opinion/survey-public-strongly-rejects-second-amendment-repeal/
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their
interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further
the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their >> interests.
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business and vote accordingly.But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
ScottW
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further
On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their >>>> interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 11:10:37 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business >> and vote accordingly.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further
On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms >>>>> manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their >>>>> interests.
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>>>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
ScottW
You would think the greedy NRA tool of gun manufacturers would OPPOSE
sales of used guns.
On 21/06/2023 1:10 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further >> the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms >>>> manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their >>>> interests.
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business**Prove it.
and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit,
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 3:22:10 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 21/06/2023 1:10 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further >> the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers) >> is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms >>>> manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
Go read what you wrote moron.The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business**Prove it.
and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit,
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
The goal post just crushed your pea brain.
ScottW
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 3:22:10 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 21/06/2023 1:10 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:**Prove it.
On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further >>>> the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers) >>>> is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>**They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms >>>>>> manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their >>>>>> interests.
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>>>>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal?
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business >>> and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit,
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
Go read what you wrote moron.
The goal post just crushed your pea brain.
ScottW
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain inbusiness
and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are tooeasily made
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturersbusiness.
On 21/06/2023 10:34 am, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 3:22:10 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 21/06/2023 1:10 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:**Prove it.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further >>>> the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers) >>>> is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>interests.
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>>>>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal? >>>>>> **They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms >>>>>> manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business
and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit,
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
Go read what you wrote moron.
The goal post just crushed your pea brain.
ScottW**Here is the full text of my response (context added)
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 5:49:55 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 21/06/2023 10:34 am, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 3:22:10 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 21/06/2023 1:10 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:**Prove it.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:**I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further >>>>>> the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers) >>>>>> is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>>>
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the >>>>>>>>>> demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal? >>>>>>>> **They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms >>>>>>>> manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their >>>>>>>> interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests".
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business
and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit,
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
**Here is the full text of my response (context added)
Go read what you wrote moron.
The goal post just crushed your pea brain.
ScottW
and the weight of those goalposts continues to grow.
Oh well, at least we know you're a fan of the weapons industry conglomerate. Vista Outdoor is so happy.
ScottW
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain inbusiness
and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are tooeasily made
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturersbusiness.
On 21/06/2023 11:03 am, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 5:49:55 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 21/06/2023 10:34 am, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 3:22:10 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 21/06/2023 1:10 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:**Prove it.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the
demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal? >>>>>>>> **They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms
interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests". >>>>>> **I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business
and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit,
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
'**Here is the full text of my response (context added)
Go read what you wrote moron.
The goal post just crushed your pea brain.
ScottW
and the weight of those goalposts continues to grow.
Oh well, at least we know you're a fan of the weapons industry conglomerate.
Vista Outdoor is so happy.
ScottW**Here is the full text of my response (context added) dickhead:
---
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain inbusiness
and vote accordingly.
**Prove it.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are tooeasily made
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturersbusiness.
**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit, regardless of what guns are purchased. Like an automobile, many people
will sell a firearm in order to fund the purchase of a new firearm. And,
of course, the big one: So-called 'straw purchases' of guns. It works
like this:
A person who is forbidden to own firearms, asks a friend (who is not forbidden to purchase firearms) to toddle off to a gun show and buy some firearms for them. It was by this method that the Columbine killers
obtained some of their weapons. The buyer was not punished. Here in Australia, the purchaser would have spent time in jail and would be forbidden to purchase firearms forever.
---
On 21/06/2023 11:03 am, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 5:49:55 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
On 21/06/2023 10:34 am, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 3:22:10 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>> On 21/06/2023 1:10 am, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:47:14 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>> On 20/06/2023 11:28 am, ScottW wrote:**Prove it.
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 6:23:11 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote: >>>>>>>> On 20/06/2023 10:56 am, ScottW wrote:the interests of a small number of people (the firearms manufacturers)
On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 5:49:01 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:manufacturers. They are elected by the American people to act in their
ScottW**Heartless, is voting for the criminals who steadfastly follow the
demands of the NRA.
They do what they were elected to do and you call it criminal? >>>>>>>> **They are not elected to act for the narrow demands of the firearms
interests.
But you seem to think you're the decider of "their interests". >>>>>> **I'm not, but feel free to explain how a candidate who acts to further
is in the interests of the majority of Americans.
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain in business
and vote accordingly.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are too easily made**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit,
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturers business.
**Here is the full text of my response (context added)
Go read what you wrote moron.
The goal post just crushed your pea brain.
ScottW
and the weight of those goalposts continues to grow.
Oh well, at least we know you're a fan of the weapons industry conglomerate.
Vista Outdoor is so happy.
ScottW**Here is the full text of my response (context added) dickhead:
---
The majority of Americans want firearms manufacturers to remain inbusiness
and vote accordingly.
**Prove it.
And you're being illogical....arguing that used gun sales are tooeasily made
while ignoring that a used gun market doesn't help gun manufacturersbusiness.
**Now you're just being an idiot. Ammunition manufacturers benefit, regardless of what guns are purchased. Like an automobile, many people
will sell a firearm in order to fund the purchase of a new firearm. And,
of course, the big one: So-called 'straw purchases' of guns. It works
like this:
A person who is forbidden to own firearms, asks a friend (who is not forbidden to purchase firearms) to toddle off to a gun show and buy some firearms for them. It was by this method that the Columbine killers
obtained some of their weapons. The buyer was not punished. Here in Australia, the purchaser would have spent time in jail and would be forbidden to purchase firearms forever.
---
You missed my first point:
PROVE IT.
--
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 489 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 40:47:54 |
| Calls: | 9,670 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,716 |
| Messages: | 6,169,727 |