Plaintiffs:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is
asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like a negotiation
than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?
If that was true Trump would have a doozy of a suit against all the major leftists networks.
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:18:58 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
Plaintiffs:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is
asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like a negotiation
than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?
If that was true Trump would have a doozy of a suit against all the major leftists networks.
Is Dominion suing all those election officials who say their machines must be scrapped
if "chain of custody" is broken too?
Can I sue you for claiming chain of custody is sufficient protection against fraud?
Damages awarded based upon what the defendant can bear.....10c
On 2/17/23 11:08 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:18:58 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
Plaintiffs:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is
asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like a negotiation
than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?Perhaps you should consult the "Factual Background" section. The
allegations cover statements by Fox hosts. Start at p. 20, just to get started.
If that was true Trump would have a doozy of a suit against all the major leftists networks.If he could show the so-called leftists were saying one thing in private
and something else they knew not to be true, he might also have a case.
Is Dominion suing all those election officials who say their machines must be scrappedYou still don't understand what chain of custody is.
if "chain of custody" is broken too?
Can I sue you for claiming chain of custody is sufficient protection against fraud?Just to point out the obvious, Dominion isn't responsible for chains of custody broken while the machines were in state hands.
Damages awarded based upon what the defendant can bear.....10c
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 11:52:03 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/17/23 11:08 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:18:58 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Perhaps you should consult the "Factual Background" section. The
Plaintiffs:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is
asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like a negotiation
than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?
allegations cover statements by Fox hosts. Start at p. 20, just to get
started.
As you often say....If you have a point....
If that was true Trump would have a doozy of a suit against all the major leftists networks.If he could show the so-called leftists were saying one thing in private
and something else they knew not to be true, he might also have a case.
Is Dominion suing all those election officials who say their machines must be scrappedYou still don't understand what chain of custody is.
if "chain of custody" is broken too?
LoL.... I'm only going by what the custodians say.
Can I sue you for claiming chain of custody is sufficient protection against fraud?Just to point out the obvious, Dominion isn't responsible for chains of
Damages awarded based upon what the defendant can bear.....10c
custody broken while the machines were in state hands.
No...but they are responsible for a machine that can't ever known safe.
Can you prove chain of custody has never been broken?
Or that the custodians aren't committing any malfeasance?
The answer is clearly no. "Can't prove a negative".
So you can't prove the machines are good to go.
It's an insane situation that only someone incredibly ignorant could accept...unless they other motives.
Do you have other motives?
On 2/17/23 6:20 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 11:52:03 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/17/23 11:08 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:18:58 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Perhaps you should consult the "Factual Background" section. The
Plaintiffs:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is
asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like a negotiation >>>> than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?
allegations cover statements by Fox hosts. Start at p. 20, just to get
started.
As you often say....If you have a point....I was responding to you, but not to worry, Carlson should have a
response for you out any minute now. The document is now all over the mainstream media now.
https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/fox-news-dominion-voting-lawsuit-summary-judgment-1235527048/
"Dominion Voting Systems alleges that emails, depositions and text
messages among Fox News executives and its top stars show that the
network had a clear financial motive to lie to its audience about voter
fraud in the wake of the 2020 election.
In a summary judgement motion filed Thursday, the company argued that
Fox anchors feared losing viewers to rival Newsmax if they did not
perpetuate the fantasy that the election was stolen from President Trump."
Not nearly as much fun as making a "Media Matters or Fox News figure?"
quiz. Okay, one:
"[T]heir hosts were extremely one sided, ignored the facts, they did not
seem to care about telling the truth, they seemed to invest truly in conspiracy theories versus fact."
If that was true Trump would have a doozy of a suit against all the major leftists networks.If he could show the so-called leftists were saying one thing in private >> and something else they knew not to be true, he might also have a case. >>> Is Dominion suing all those election officials who say their machines must be scrapped
if "chain of custody" is broken too?You still don't understand what chain of custody is.
LoL.... I'm only going by what the custodians say.The "custodians" aren't blaming Dominion for the lost chain of custody.
Can I sue you for claiming chain of custody is sufficient protection against fraud?Just to point out the obvious, Dominion isn't responsible for chains of
Damages awarded based upon what the defendant can bear.....10c
custody broken while the machines were in state hands.
No...but they are responsible for a machine that can't ever known safe.That's your idee fixee. It's not logical as you are trying to give the machine a quality that belongs not to it but to its environment.
Can you prove chain of custody has never been broken?Yes. That's the point of a chain of custody.
Or that the custodians aren't committing any malfeasance?Higher odds they did if they were Republican.
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 5:25:19 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/17/23 6:20 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 11:52:03 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:I was responding to you, but not to worry, Carlson should have a
On 2/17/23 11:08 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:18:58 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Perhaps you should consult the "Factual Background" section. The
Plaintiffs:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is >>>>>> asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like a negotiation >>>>>> than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?
allegations cover statements by Fox hosts. Start at p. 20, just to get >>>> started.
As you often say....If you have a point....
response for you out any minute now. The document is now all over the
mainstream media now.
https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/fox-news-dominion-voting-lawsuit-summary-judgment-1235527048/
"Dominion Voting Systems alleges that emails, depositions and text
messages among Fox News executives and its top stars show that the
network had a clear financial motive to lie to its audience about voter
fraud in the wake of the 2020 election.
LoL....I've been telling you about that in media for years. Nothing new here.
But if this case can make media stop lying and pimping BS for ratings....I'm all in.
CNN might have to dump every one of their ex-gov't official contributors.
In a summary judgement motion filed Thursday, the company argued that
Fox anchors feared losing viewers to rival Newsmax if they did not
perpetuate the fantasy that the election was stolen from President Trump."
Oh boy...the company argued.
I watched...and I don't recall them ever saying it was. It was always might have been
and these things are suspect.
Like sleepy Joe campaigning from his basement shattering vote records.
Is that a lie?
Not nearly as much fun as making a "Media Matters or Fox News figure?"
quiz. Okay, one:
"[T]heir hosts were extremely one sided, ignored the facts, they did not
seem to care about telling the truth, they seemed to invest truly in
conspiracy theories versus fact."
Did not seem.....Hmm. Sound highly subjective.
You do not like the way I perceive you to seem either.
The "custodians" aren't blaming Dominion for the lost chain of custody.If that was true Trump would have a doozy of a suit against all the major leftists networks.If he could show the so-called leftists were saying one thing in private >>>> and something else they knew not to be true, he might also have a case. >>>>> Is Dominion suing all those election officials who say their machines must be scrapped
if "chain of custody" is broken too?You still don't understand what chain of custody is.
LoL.... I'm only going by what the custodians say.
and Stephen can't get out of reverse....again. Drive to shit to "D".
That's your idee fixee. It's not logical as you are trying to give theCan I sue you for claiming chain of custody is sufficient protection against fraud?Just to point out the obvious, Dominion isn't responsible for chains of >>>> custody broken while the machines were in state hands.
Damages awarded based upon what the defendant can bear.....10c
No...but they are responsible for a machine that can't ever known safe.
machine a quality that belongs not to it but to its environment.
BS....The machine comes out the factory in a known "good" state.
But if someone unauthorized ever gets to be alone with it....it's suddenly permanently untrustworthy and must be scrapped.
How does that make it ever trustworthy? It's an absurd situation.
Can you prove chain of custody has never been broken?Yes. That's the point of a chain of custody.
Now you're BSing AND Fat ASS LYING!
Or that the custodians aren't committing any malfeasance?Higher odds they did if they were Republican.
And there we have it. Stephen will never accept the outcome of a
republican administered election.
I'm shocked.
On 2/18/23 10:22 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 5:25:19 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/17/23 6:20 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 11:52:03 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:I was responding to you, but not to worry, Carlson should have a
On 2/17/23 11:08 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:18:58 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> Plaintiffs:Perhaps you should consult the "Factual Background" section. The
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is >>>>>> asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like a negotiation >>>>>> than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?
allegations cover statements by Fox hosts. Start at p. 20, just to get >>>> started.
As you often say....If you have a point....
response for you out any minute now. The document is now all over the
mainstream media now.
https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/fox-news-dominion-voting-lawsuit-summary-judgment-1235527048/
"Dominion Voting Systems alleges that emails, depositions and text
messages among Fox News executives and its top stars show that the
network had a clear financial motive to lie to its audience about voter
fraud in the wake of the 2020 election.
LoL....I've been telling you about that in media for years. Nothing new here.The cynic's folly on display.
But if this case can make media stop lying and pimping BS for ratings....I'm all in.
CNN might have to dump every one of their ex-gov't official contributors.
In a summary judgement motion filed Thursday, the company argued that
Fox anchors feared losing viewers to rival Newsmax if they did not
perpetuate the fantasy that the election was stolen from President Trump."
Oh boy...the company argued.You seem to care when it's Twitter.
I watched...and I don't recall them ever saying it was. It was always might have beenThat's why Dominion gathered evidence rather than rely on your memory.
and these things are suspect.
Like sleepy Joe campaigning from his basement shattering vote records.
Is that a lie?It's incorrect: he didn't campaign from his basement.
Since there are
more people now, it's no surprise a winning candidate will get a record number of votes.
Not nearly as much fun as making a "Media Matters or Fox News figure?"
quiz. Okay, one:
"[T]heir hosts were extremely one sided, ignored the facts, they did not >> seem to care about telling the truth, they seemed to invest truly in
conspiracy theories versus fact."
Did not seem.....Hmm. Sound highly subjective.So MM or Fox executive?
You do not like the way I perceive you to seem either.
The "custodians" aren't blaming Dominion for the lost chain of custody.If that was true Trump would have a doozy of a suit against all the major leftists networks.If he could show the so-called leftists were saying one thing in private >>>> and something else they knew not to be true, he might also have a case. >>>>> Is Dominion suing all those election officials who say their machines must be scrapped
if "chain of custody" is broken too?You still don't understand what chain of custody is.
LoL.... I'm only going by what the custodians say.
and Stephen can't get out of reverse....again. Drive to shit to "D".You're driving to wrong conclusions no matter the gear.
machine a quality that belongs not to it but to its environment.Can I sue you for claiming chain of custody is sufficient protection against fraud?Just to point out the obvious, Dominion isn't responsible for chains of >>>> custody broken while the machines were in state hands.
Damages awarded based upon what the defendant can bear.....10c
No...but they are responsible for a machine that can't ever known safe. >> That's your idee fixee. It's not logical as you are trying to give the
BS....The machine comes out the factory in a known "good" state.Yes, that's what chain of custody is.
But if someone unauthorized ever gets to be alone with it....it's suddenly permanently untrustworthy and must be scrapped.
How does that make it ever trustworthy? It's an absurd situation.It's trustworthy until it gets left with an untrustworthy person. The condition isn't retroactive.
Can you prove chain of custody has never been broken?Yes. That's the point of a chain of custody.
Now you're BSing AND Fat ASS LYING!If you can't prove it, it's broken.
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chain-of-custody-digital-forensics/
The equivalent for electronic data.
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 9:15:15 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is
On 2/18/23 10:22 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 5:25:19 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/17/23 6:20 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 11:52:03 AM UTC-8, mINE109
wrote:
On 2/17/23 11:08 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:18:58 PM UTC-8,
mINE109 wrote:
Plaintiffs:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
"Dominion Voting Systems alleges that emails, depositions and textI was responding to you, but not to worry, Carlson should havePerhaps you should consult the "Factual Background"asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like
a negotiation than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?
section. The allegations cover statements by Fox hosts.
Start at p. 20, just to get started.
As you often say....If you have a point....
a response for you out any minute now. The document is now all
over the mainstream media now.
https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/fox-news-dominion-voting-lawsuit-summary-judgment-1235527048/
The cynic's folly on display.messages among Fox News executives and its top stars show that
the network had a clear financial motive to lie to its
audience about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 election.
LoL....I've been telling you about that in media for years.
Nothing new here. But if this case can make media stop lying and
pimping BS for ratings....I'm all in. CNN might have to dump
every one of their ex-gov't official contributors.
You seem to care when it's Twitter.In a summary judgement motion filed Thursday, the company
argued that Fox anchors feared losing viewers to rival Newsmax
if they did not perpetuate the fantasy that the election was
stolen from President Trump."
Oh boy...the company argued.
Twitter was outing themselves. Talk about folly....you are being
follycious.
I watched...and I don't recall them ever saying it was. It wasThat's why Dominion gathered evidence rather than rely on your
always might have been and these things are suspect.
memory.
All I see is conflict between on air and in private takes on things.
What a shock! Wanna bet Don Lemon thinks women over 30 are past
their prime?
Like sleepy Joe campaigning from his basement shattering voteIt's incorrect: he didn't campaign from his basement.
records.
Is that a lie?
That's my perception. And my perception is mine, not yours. You can
have you own, but you can't claim mine isn't mine.
Since there are more people now, it's no surprise a winning
candidate will get a record number of votes.
LoL.....you say the dumbest stuff at times.
So MM or Fox executive?Not nearly as much fun as making a "Media Matters or Fox News
figure?" quiz. Okay, one:
"[T]heir hosts were extremely one sided, ignored the facts,
they did not seem to care about telling the truth, they seemed
to invest truly in conspiracy theories versus fact."
Did not seem.....Hmm. Sound highly subjective. You do not like
the way I perceive you to seem either.
Both or neither...you question is obviously nonsensical.
You're driving to wrong conclusions no matter the gear.The "custodians" aren't blaming Dominion for the lost chain ofIs Dominion suing all those election officials who sayYou still don't understand what chain of custody is.
their machines must be scrapped if "chain of custody" is
broken too?
LoL.... I'm only going by what the custodians say.
custody.
and Stephen can't get out of reverse....again. Drive to shit to
"D".
IYO.
Yes, that's what chain of custody is.That's your idee fixee. It's not logical as you are trying toCan I sue you for claiming chain of custody isJust to point out the obvious, Dominion isn't responsible
sufficient protection against fraud? Damages awarded
based upon what the defendant can bear.....10c
for chains of custody broken while the machines were in
state hands.
No...but they are responsible for a machine that can't ever
known safe.
give the machine a quality that belongs not to it but to its
environment.
BS....The machine comes out the factory in a known "good" state.
But if someone unauthorized ever gets to be alone with
it....it's suddenly permanently untrustworthy and must be
scrapped.
How does that make it ever trustworthy? It's an absurdIt's trustworthy until it gets left with an untrustworthy person.
situation.
The condition isn't retroactive.
I don't trust anyone. I sure as hell don't trust you. And I'll
never trust a system unnecessarily dependent upon chain of custody.
If you can't prove it, it's broken.Can you prove chain of custody has never been broken?Yes. That's the point of a chain of custody.
Now you're BSing AND Fat ASS LYING!
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chain-of-custody-digital-forensics/
The equivalent for electronic data.
There's no equivalence between hardware and data.
And to further remove us from relevance, this is all about "evidence"
which is a wholly different subject which by necessity and with no
other possible choice must be preserved as found...and for that
reason alone chain of custody is one aspect of proving that
preservation.
I'm tired of your repetition of such a moronic argument.
On 2/18/23 12:07 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 9:15:15 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:Meanwhile Fox is arguing SLAAP, 1st Amendment and that Dominion is
On 2/18/23 10:22 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 5:25:19 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/17/23 6:20 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, February 17, 2023 at 11:52:03 AM UTC-8, mINE109
wrote:
On 2/17/23 11:08 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 at 6:18:58 PM UTC-8,
mINE109 wrote:
Plaintiffs:
https://int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/redacted-documents-in-dominion-fox-news-case/dca5e3880422426f/full.pdf
"Dominion Voting Systems alleges that emails, depositions and textI was responding to you, but not to worry, Carlson should havePerhaps you should consult the "Factual Background"asking too much in damages. This last sounds more like
a negotiation than a defense.
Is Fox really liable for what guests may say?
section. The allegations cover statements by Fox hosts.
Start at p. 20, just to get started.
As you often say....If you have a point....
a response for you out any minute now. The document is now all
over the mainstream media now.
https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/fox-news-dominion-voting-lawsuit-summary-judgment-1235527048/
The cynic's folly on display.messages among Fox News executives and its top stars show that
the network had a clear financial motive to lie to its
audience about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 election.
LoL....I've been telling you about that in media for years.
Nothing new here. But if this case can make media stop lying and
pimping BS for ratings....I'm all in. CNN might have to dump
every one of their ex-gov't official contributors.
You seem to care when it's Twitter.In a summary judgement motion filed Thursday, the company
argued that Fox anchors feared losing viewers to rival Newsmax
if they did not perpetuate the fantasy that the election was
stolen from President Trump."
Oh boy...the company argued.
Twitter was outing themselves. Talk about folly....you are being follycious.Twitter doesn't have a 200 page motion for summary judgment full of
evidence.
I watched...and I don't recall them ever saying it was. It wasThat's why Dominion gathered evidence rather than rely on your
always might have been and these things are suspect.
memory.
All I see is conflict between on air and in private takes on things.Yes, that conflict demonstrates actual malice.
What a shock! Wanna bet Don Lemon thinks women over 30 are pastThat doesn't qualify as defamation, just a bizarre opinion.
their prime?
Like sleepy Joe campaigning from his basement shattering voteIt's incorrect: he didn't campaign from his basement.
records.
Is that a lie?
That's my perception. And my perception is mine, not yours. You can"It's not a lie if you believe it."
have you own, but you can't claim mine isn't mine.
Since there are more people now, it's no surprise a winning
candidate will get a record number of votes.
LoL.....you say the dumbest stuff at times.Dumb would be expecting the same result from a different number of voters. >>>> Not nearly as much fun as making a "Media Matters or Fox News
So MM or Fox executive?figure?" quiz. Okay, one:
"[T]heir hosts were extremely one sided, ignored the facts,
they did not seem to care about telling the truth, they seemed
to invest truly in conspiracy theories versus fact."
Did not seem.....Hmm. Sound highly subjective. You do not like
the way I perceive you to seem either.
Both or neither...you question is obviously nonsensical.Okay, you refuse to guess. It is a real quote. No matter, I've already revealed the answer.
You're driving to wrong conclusions no matter the gear.The "custodians" aren't blaming Dominion for the lost chain ofIs Dominion suing all those election officials who sayYou still don't understand what chain of custody is.
their machines must be scrapped if "chain of custody" is
broken too?
LoL.... I'm only going by what the custodians say.
custody.
and Stephen can't get out of reverse....again. Drive to shit to
"D".
IYO.No, the definition of chain of custody is not an opinion.
Yes, that's what chain of custody is.That's your idee fixee. It's not logical as you are trying toCan I sue you for claiming chain of custody isJust to point out the obvious, Dominion isn't responsible
sufficient protection against fraud? Damages awarded
based upon what the defendant can bear.....10c
for chains of custody broken while the machines were in
state hands.
No...but they are responsible for a machine that can't ever
known safe.
give the machine a quality that belongs not to it but to its
environment.
BS....The machine comes out the factory in a known "good" state.
But if someone unauthorized ever gets to be alone with
it....it's suddenly permanently untrustworthy and must be
scrapped.
How does that make it ever trustworthy? It's an absurdIt's trustworthy until it gets left with an untrustworthy person.
situation.
The condition isn't retroactive.
I don't trust anyone. I sure as hell don't trust you. And I'll"Unnecessarily"? There goes your argument. The point of the chain is the paper trail: you're not taking someone's word for it.
never trust a system unnecessarily dependent upon chain of custody.
If you can't prove it, it's broken.Can you prove chain of custody has never been broken?Yes. That's the point of a chain of custody.
Now you're BSing AND Fat ASS LYING!
https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/chain-of-custody-digital-forensics/
The equivalent for electronic data.
There's no equivalence between hardware and data.That's what I mean when I say you're wrong to think the quality belongs
to the object.
And to further remove us from relevance, this is all about "evidence"
which is a wholly different subject which by necessity and with no
other possible choice must be preserved as found...and for that
reason alone chain of custody is one aspect of proving that
preservation.
I'm tired of your repetition of such a moronic argument.Since you won't be convinced by argument or evidence, you may assume I
still know you're wrong even if I don't respond to you on the subject.
https://www.eac.gov/election-officials/chain-custody-best-practices
"The chain of custody of ballots, voting equipment, and associated data
is essential to ensure the election system remains trustworthy.
Documentation of the chain of custody also provides evidence that all
voting procedures were followed. It is a best practice for chain of
custody procedures to be clearly defined in advance of every election,
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:41:34 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/18/23 12:07 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 9:15:15 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/fox-news-dominion-voting-lawsuit-summary-judgment-1235527048/
"Dominion Voting Systems alleges that emails, depositions and text
messages among Fox News executives and its top stars show that
the network had a clear financial motive to lie to its
audience about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 election.
Twitter doesn't have a 200 page motion for summary judgment full ofOh boy...the company argued.You seem to care when it's Twitter.
Twitter was outing themselves. Talk about folly....you are being
follycious.
evidence.
No shit. I note it was you who brought Twitter in for comparison and
I rejected it as invalid.
I'm tired of your repetition of such a moronic argument.Since you won't be convinced by argument or evidence, you may assume I
still know you're wrong even if I don't respond to you on the subject.
https://www.eac.gov/election-officials/chain-custody-best-practices
"The chain of custody of ballots, voting equipment, and associated data
is essential to ensure the election system remains trustworthy.
Documentation of the chain of custody also provides evidence that all
voting procedures were followed. It is a best practice for chain of
custody procedures to be clearly defined in advance of every election,
That's their best practice? Hmmm.....by your own admission they need
chain of custody procedures from the time the machines leave the production line.
It has nothing to do with election schedules.
This is just a bunch of BS to make fools think things are all hunky dory.
On 2/19/23 7:32 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 1:41:34 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 2/18/23 12:07 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Saturday, February 18, 2023 at 9:15:15 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
https://variety.com/2023/tv/news/fox-news-dominion-voting-lawsuit-summary-judgment-1235527048/
"Dominion Voting Systems alleges that emails, depositions and text
Twitter doesn't have a 200 page motion for summary judgment full ofYou seem to care when it's Twitter.messages among Fox News executives and its top stars show thatOh boy...the company argued.
the network had a clear financial motive to lie to its
audience about voter fraud in the wake of the 2020 election.
Twitter was outing themselves. Talk about folly....you are being
follycious.
evidence.
No shit. I note it was you who brought Twitter in for comparison andI brought up how you felt about it. And what Twitter outed was: Trump
I rejected it as invalid.
was the only President who asked for specific tweets to be taken down
because he didn't like them; the FBI had valid fair election law
concerns; and nonconsensual nude pictures are against their terms of
service.
<snip>
I'm tired of your repetition of such a moronic argument.Since you won't be convinced by argument or evidence, you may assume I
still know you're wrong even if I don't respond to you on the subject.
https://www.eac.gov/election-officials/chain-custody-best-practices
"The chain of custody of ballots, voting equipment, and associated data
is essential to ensure the election system remains trustworthy.
Documentation of the chain of custody also provides evidence that all
voting procedures were followed. It is a best practice for chain of
custody procedures to be clearly defined in advance of every election,
That's their best practice? Hmmm.....by your own admission they needYes, defining custody practices in advance is best practice.
chain of custody procedures from the time the machines leave the production line.
It has nothing to do with election schedules.
Yes, defining custody practices in advance is best practice.The fact that you have to even state something so obvious is kind of moronic.
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:19:38 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
Yes, defining custody practices in advance is best practice.
The fact that you have to even state something so obvious is kind of moronic.
On 2/20/23 6:28 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Monday, February 20, 2023 at 8:19:38 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
Yes, defining custody practices in advance is best practice.
The fact that you have to even state something so obvious is kind of moronic.Examine that thought.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 150:59:58 |
| Calls: | 10,383 |
| Files: | 14,054 |
| Messages: | 6,417,797 |