• EU squabbles

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 4 21:32:51 2023
    European Union countries failed to adopt conclusions on climate diplomacy that had been planned for Monday, owing to a deepening spat over the role of nuclear energy in the green transition, EU officials said.

    The upset is the latest development in a dispute between France and other countries who want more EU policies to promote nuclear energy’s contribution to cutting CO2 emissions, and those like Germany and Spain who warn this risks distracting from
    efforts to massively expand renewable energy.

    Seems really stupid to me. Germany is on track to close it's Nukes and fire up some coal to cover the shortage. Really really dumb.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sun Mar 5 17:24:20 2023
    On 5/03/2023 4:32 pm, ScottW wrote:
    European Union countries failed to adopt conclusions on climate diplomacy that had been planned for Monday, owing to a deepening spat over the role of nuclear energy in the green transition, EU officials said.

    The upset is the latest development in a dispute between France and other countries who want more EU policies to promote nuclear energy’s contribution to cutting CO2 emissions, and those like Germany and Spain who warn this risks distracting from
    efforts to massively expand renewable energy.

    Seems really stupid to me. Germany is on track to close it's Nukes and fire up some coal to cover the shortage. Really really dumb.

    ScottW

    **Nukes are dumb and a short term fix. Besides, it takes decades to
    plan, build and commission a nuke. How much will renewables fall in cost
    by the time one is built?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economics_of_nuclear_power_plants#/media/File:3-Learning-curves-for-electricity-prices.png

    Start building a nuke today and fusion generation may well be a reality
    by the time construction s complete. Solar PV and wind are cheaper
    anyway. Even when taking storage costs into account.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Sun Mar 5 10:42:34 2023
    On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 10:24:21 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 5/03/2023 4:32 pm, ScottW wrote:
    European Union countries failed to adopt conclusions on climate diplomacy that had been planned for Monday, owing to a deepening spat over the role of nuclear energy in the green transition, EU officials said.

    The upset is the latest development in a dispute between France and other countries who want more EU policies to promote nuclear energy’s contribution to cutting CO2 emissions, and those like Germany and Spain who warn this risks distracting from
    efforts to massively expand renewable energy.

    Seems really stupid to me. Germany is on track to close it's Nukes and fire up some coal to cover the shortage. Really really dumb.

    ScottW
    **Nukes are dumb and a short term fix. Besides, it takes decades to
    plan, build and commission a nuke. How much will renewables fall in cost
    by the time one is built?

    I'll put you down as pro-coal to fill the gap between existing nuclear plants and future
    renewable capacity....cuz that's what you did in your stupor state.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Mar 6 07:36:09 2023
    On 6/03/2023 5:42 am, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 10:24:21 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 5/03/2023 4:32 pm, ScottW wrote:
    European Union countries failed to adopt conclusions on climate diplomacy that had been planned for Monday, owing to a deepening spat over the role of nuclear energy in the green transition, EU officials said.

    The upset is the latest development in a dispute between France and other countries who want more EU policies to promote nuclear energy’s contribution to cutting CO2 emissions, and those like Germany and Spain who warn this risks distracting from
    efforts to massively expand renewable energy.

    Seems really stupid to me. Germany is on track to close it's Nukes and fire up some coal to cover the shortage. Really really dumb.

    ScottW
    **Nukes are dumb and a short term fix. Besides, it takes decades to
    plan, build and commission a nuke. How much will renewables fall in cost
    by the time one is built?

    I'll put you down as pro-coal to fill the gap between existing nuclear plants and future
    renewable capacity....cuz that's what you did in your stupor state.

    ScottW

    **Nope. Coal fired power stations are being closed down where I live.
    ALL my electricity comes from renewable sources. Better still: Renewable
    energy costs are falling rapidly. My electricity bill is falling, not
    rising.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Sun Mar 5 18:08:24 2023
    On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 12:36:13 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 6/03/2023 5:42 am, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 10:24:21 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 5/03/2023 4:32 pm, ScottW wrote:
    European Union countries failed to adopt conclusions on climate diplomacy that had been planned for Monday, owing to a deepening spat over the role of nuclear energy in the green transition, EU officials said.

    The upset is the latest development in a dispute between France and other countries who want more EU policies to promote nuclear energy’s contribution to cutting CO2 emissions, and those like Germany and Spain who warn this risks distracting from
    efforts to massively expand renewable energy.

    Seems really stupid to me. Germany is on track to close it's Nukes and fire up some coal to cover the shortage. Really really dumb.

    ScottW
    **Nukes are dumb and a short term fix. Besides, it takes decades to
    plan, build and commission a nuke. How much will renewables fall in cost >> by the time one is built?

    I'll put you down as pro-coal to fill the gap between existing nuclear plants and future
    renewable capacity....cuz that's what you did in your stupor state.

    ScottW
    **Nope. Coal fired power stations are being closed down where I live.

    Do you live in Germany or the EU? Put down the crack pipe.

    ALL my electricity comes from renewable sources. Better still: Renewable energy costs are falling rapidly. My electricity bill is falling, not rising.

    I live in the service area of the number 1 leading "renewable" sourced utility or at least they claim to be.
    My electric bill starting Jan 1 which is a bunch of BS smoke and mirrors trying obscure what they've done amounted to 50c/KwH.
    And I'm not using any power in their punitive tier pricing.

    The monetary magic tricks they used to hide the cost from consumers
    until it was too late have finally started to expire. Loans with a decade of deferred
    interest on infrastructure are now needing payment....and we're getting f'd. It's been a giant decades long scam hiding the cost of switching.

    Meanwhile...Germany is playing games with France and demanding that the 70%
    of their nuclear sourced electricity not be counted in their goals toward carbon
    free energy.
    That's BS. Can you do the math on the carbon footprint of tearing down a perfectly good nuke plant
    and replacing it with 10,000 windmills? It won't be net carbon negative in 50 or even a 100 years...
    and probably not ever.
    So if eliminating carbon isn't the agenda....what is? You'll need your crack pipe back to figure that out.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Sun Mar 5 21:43:19 2023
    On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 3:36:13 PM UTC-5, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 6/03/2023 5:42 am, ScottW wrote:
    On Saturday, March 4, 2023 at 10:24:21 PM UTC-8, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 5/03/2023 4:32 pm, ScottW wrote:
    European Union countries failed to adopt conclusions on climate diplomacy that had been planned for Monday, owing to a deepening spat over the role of nuclear energy in the green transition, EU officials said.

    The upset is the latest development in a dispute between France and other countries who want more EU policies to promote nuclear energy’s contribution to cutting CO2 emissions, and those like Germany and Spain who warn this risks distracting from
    efforts to massively expand renewable energy.

    Seems really stupid to me. Germany is on track to close it's Nukes and fire up some coal to cover the shortage. Really really dumb.

    ScottW
    **Nukes are dumb and a short term fix. Besides, it takes decades to
    plan, build and commission a nuke. How much will renewables fall in cost >> by the time one is built?

    I'll put you down as pro-coal to fill the gap between existing nuclear plants and future
    renewable capacity....cuz that's what you did in your stupor state.

    ScottW
    **Nope. Coal fired power stations are being closed down where I live.
    ALL my electricity comes from renewable sources. Better still: Renewable energy costs are falling rapidly. My electricity bill is falling, not rising.
    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com'

    You fucking LIAR!
    Look at these pretty fossil fuel pictures around Sidney https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=power+station+near+sydney-&qpvt=power+station+near+Sydney-&form=IGRE&first=1

    And here is a list of all power stations in NSW.
    complements of Wiki
    Plenty of fossil fuels, including coal
    notice that the windfarms have relatively minimal output
    And there are still five active coal
    and 5 active gas turbine plants.

    I would't think that not one of these would be connected to your grid.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_New_South_Wales

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MINe109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Mon Mar 6 08:25:39 2023
    On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 11:43:21 PM UTC-6, Art Sackman wrote:

    I would't think that not one of these would be connected to your grid.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_New_South_Wales

    That doesn't mean Trevor gets his power from them:

    https://getgreenpower.sydney

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 6 09:54:54 2023
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 11:25:41 AM UTC-5, MINe109 wrote:
    On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 11:43:21 PM UTC-6, Art Sackman wrote:

    I would't think that not one of these would be connected to your grid.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_New_South_Wales
    That doesn't mean Trevor gets his power from them:

    https://getgreenpower.sydney

    Let's pray together that our good friend, Trevor, hasn't fallen prey to such scam artists.
    The power on the grid is combined from many sources, and cannot, and is not, separated by source.
    What you are showing me is merely an accounting trick, He pays his bill to a source that goes not contribute
    fossil fuels power to the grid. But only a miniscule portion of the electricity entering his
    home comes from that source. Basically, you are pointing out
    gratuitous and worthless virtue signaling.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 6 09:58:03 2023
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 11:25:41 AM UTC-5, MINe109 wrote:
    On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 11:43:21 PM UTC-6, Art Sackman wrote:

    I would't think that not one of these would be connected to your grid.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_New_South_Wales
    That doesn't mean Trevor gets his power from them:

    https://getgreenpower.sydney

    If every customer in Sydney did that, there very cold and dark days and nights ahead.
    Your power ration would stand at about ten minutes if service per day.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Mar 6 15:19:18 2023
    On 3/5/23 8:08 PM, ScottW wrote:
    I live in the service area of the number 1 leading "renewable"
    sourced utility or at least they claim to be. My electric bill
    starting Jan 1 which is a bunch of BS smoke and mirrors trying
    obscure what they've done amounted to 50c/KwH. And I'm not using any
    power in their punitive tier pricing.

    I just saw a KUSI interview in which a consumer advocate lawyer
    explained the rates go up because the local utility makes money from
    capital projects, not from consumer energy use.

    So "renewable" isn't to blame, "new" is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Mon Mar 6 15:32:24 2023
    On 3/6/23 11:58 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 11:25:41 AM UTC-5, MINe109 wrote:
    On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 11:43:21 PM UTC-6, Art Sackman wrote:

    I would't think that not one of these would be connected to your
    grid.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_New_South_Wales

    That doesn't mean Trevor gets his power from them:

    https://getgreenpower.sydney

    If every customer in Sydney did that,

    We're only talking about Trevor.

    there very cold and dark days and nights ahead. Your power ration
    would stand at about ten minutes if service per day.

    Wiki: "In Australia renewable energy is accredited under the GreenPower
    scheme whereby all distributors are government audited bi-annually to
    ensure that customers are getting exactly what is described in their
    purchased products."

    Maybe not an accounting trick after all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 6 15:01:38 2023
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 4:32:26 PM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
    On 3/6/23 11:58 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 11:25:41 AM UTC-5, MINe109 wrote:
    On Sunday, March 5, 2023 at 11:43:21 PM UTC-6, Art Sackman wrote:

    I would't think that not one of these would be connected to your
    grid.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_New_South_Wales

    That doesn't mean Trevor gets his power from them:

    https://getgreenpower.sydney

    If every customer in Sydney did that,
    We're only talking about Trevor.

    Hopefully nobody else in Sydney is as stupid as Trevor is.


    there very cold and dark days and nights ahead. Your power ration
    would stand at about ten minutes if service per day.

    Wiki: "In Australia renewable energy is accredited under the GreenPower scheme whereby all distributors are government audited bi-annually to
    ensure that customers are getting exactly what is described in their purchased products."

    Maybe not an accounting trick after all.


    Now that statement is just so incrediblty stupid
    Only a moron like you would fall for it.
    Do you ACTUALLY believe that electricity to each house on the grid
    is, or can be, separated by source, That you can receive just green renewable sourced electricity at your house, and that me, living next door to you can opt for only
    dirty coal and oil sourced electricity at my house?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 6 15:03:43 2023
    mINE109 wrote:

    there very cold and dark days and nights ahead. Your power ration
    would stand at about ten minutes if service per day.
    Wiki: "In Australia renewable energy is accredited under the GreenPower scheme whereby all distributors are government audited bi-annually to
    ensure that customers are getting exactly what is described in their purchased products."

    Maybe not an accounting trick after all.

    Where you see "government audit" and understand it to mean benign
    oversight to protect consumers from ripoffs, Shmoos see the encroachment
    of the mythical "deep state". From there, they only need a Brobdingnagian
    leap to know they are being forced into wokeness and new learning.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 6 20:33:40 2023
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 1:19:21 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 3/5/23 8:08 PM, ScottW wrote:
    I live in the service area of the number 1 leading "renewable"
    sourced utility or at least they claim to be. My electric bill
    starting Jan 1 which is a bunch of BS smoke and mirrors trying
    obscure what they've done amounted to 50c/KwH. And I'm not using any
    power in their punitive tier pricing.
    I just saw a KUSI interview in which a consumer advocate lawyer
    explained the rates go up because the local utility makes money from
    capital projects, not from consumer energy use.

    So "renewable" isn't to blame, "new" is.

    LoL. A new solar farm to replace existing Nuclear and they
    tell us it will be cheaper.
    Of course the nuclear infrastructure charge is included in the cost calc for the electricity it produces but the solar farm is magically exempt from including those costs.

    You can talk all the stupid BS you want. I have the utility bills to prove it. They've been lying for a decade and are still lying but those hidden costs
    are eventually passed on to the consumers and that is just beginning.
    The impact is devastating to
    many middle and lower income families.
    I have a bill for 1000 Kwh....and it's 500$.
    The profits on infrastructure are buried in that bill...but they don't make more than a few % difference. It's a BS smokescreen.

    Another horror story is the states Title 24 linked here. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-12/CEC-400-2022-010_CMF.pdf A new update is produced and enacted every 3 years. The 2022 version
    I linked went into effect 1/1/23. We're looking at a remodel project on
    one of our properties. Right now I can't get a firm bid from any of the contractors (and we gave fulls plans to 8 and only got "estimates" from 3)
    The issue....no one knows right now how the Building Inspectors are interpreting this monster.
    A simple example....it calls for water heaters to be replaced with heat pump water heaters
    if the existing system is altered or replaced. So what does "altered" mean.
    I tried to argue that we're not altering or changing the water system.
    Oddly, I can go to propane cheaper. Heat pump water heaters are about 3x
    the cost of a gas water heater. And they have lots of caveats on the
    temp range at point of installation. If you need to remote the evaporator coils
    it's even more expensive. And then there's the possible requirement for solar and every window has to be replaced etc.
    No wonder one contractor told me half the contractors have left the state.
    They couldn't keep up with the regulatory BS. Even the building inspectors can't keep up. Add to this our county just randomly rezoned our land
    and the new setbacks cut right through our garage.
    They call it legal but noncomforming. No one at County Planning and Land Use can explain why they did this. I think they just got lazy and f'd up computerizing their
    records and zoned everyone
    in county as if they were on septic requiring large setbacks for tanks and/or leech fields.
    But If I want to build an ADU, I can ignore almost all of it. Even the county recommended it to streamline
    permit application and get around the setbacks and even get low rate construction loans
    and possibly even a grant. They even said if I just add a kitchen and
    a bath anywhere...it complies and I don't ever have to rent it which is the whole f'ing
    point of the ADU program.
    How f'd up is that?

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Tue Mar 7 07:40:19 2023
    On 3/6/23 5:01 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 4:32:26 PM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:

    Wiki: "In Australia renewable energy is accredited under the GreenPower
    scheme whereby all distributors are government audited bi-annually to
    ensure that customers are getting exactly what is described in their
    purchased products."

    Maybe not an accounting trick after all.

    Now that statement is just so incrediblty stupid
    Only a moron like you would fall for it.
    Do you ACTUALLY believe that electricity to each house on the grid
    is, or can be, separated by source, That you can receive just green renewable sourced electricity at your house, and that me, living next door to you can opt for only
    dirty coal and oil sourced electricity at my house?

    No, but it is possible to have a fee on your electric bill ear-marked to support renewable sources. Fungibility: works for money, too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Tue Mar 7 07:48:09 2023
    On 3/6/23 10:33 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 1:19:21 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 3/5/23 8:08 PM, ScottW wrote:
    I live in the service area of the number 1 leading "renewable"
    sourced utility or at least they claim to be. My electric bill
    starting Jan 1 which is a bunch of BS smoke and mirrors trying
    obscure what they've done amounted to 50c/KwH. And I'm not using
    any power in their punitive tier pricing.
    I just saw a KUSI interview in which a consumer advocate lawyer
    explained the rates go up because the local utility makes money
    from capital projects, not from consumer energy use.

    So "renewable" isn't to blame, "new" is.

    LoL. A new solar farm to replace existing Nuclear and they tell us
    it will be cheaper.

    Sure, the electricity is. Paying for a new plant isn't.

    Of course the nuclear infrastructure charge is included in the cost
    calc for the electricity it produces but the solar farm is magically
    exempt from including those costs.

    You should show your electric bill to Art. He can help you with
    fungibility concepts.

    You can talk all the stupid BS you want. I have the utility bills to
    prove it. They've been lying for a decade and are still lying but
    those hidden costs are eventually passed on to the consumers and that
    is just beginning. The impact is devastating to many middle and lower
    income families. I have a bill for 1000 Kwh....and it's 500$. The
    profits on infrastructure are buried in that bill...but they don't
    make more than a few % difference. It's a BS smokescreen.

    Well, that's how they guarantee their return to investors. Whether they
    have transparent billing is a separate issue.

    Another horror story is the states Title 24 linked here. https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2022-12/CEC-400-2022-010_CMF.pdf

    A new update is produced and enacted every 3 years. The 2022 version
    I linked went into effect 1/1/23. We're looking at a remodel
    project on one of our properties. Right now I can't get a firm bid
    from any of the contractors (and we gave fulls plans to 8 and only
    got "estimates" from 3) The issue....no one knows right now how the
    Building Inspectors are interpreting this monster. A simple
    example....it calls for water heaters to be replaced with heat pump
    water heaters if the existing system is altered or replaced. So
    what does "altered" mean. I tried to argue that we're not altering or changing the water system.

    It's changing something that must meet today's rules to something that
    meets old ones.

    Oddly, I can go to propane cheaper. Heat pump water heaters are
    about 3x the cost of a gas water heater. And they have lots of
    caveats on the temp range at point of installation. If you need to
    remote the evaporator coils it's even more expensive. And then
    there's the possible requirement for solar and every window has to be replaced etc. No wonder one contractor told me half the contractors
    have left the state. They couldn't keep up with the regulatory BS.
    Even the building inspectors can't keep up.

    Maybe the new state zoning laws will lead to new construction and bring
    them back.

    Add to this our county just randomly rezoned our land and the new setbacks cut right through
    our garage. They call it legal but noncomforming. No one at County
    Planning and Land Use can explain why they did this. I think they
    just got lazy and f'd up computerizing their records and zoned
    everyone in county as if they were on septic requiring large setbacks
    for tanks and/or leech fields. But If I want to build an ADU, I can
    ignore almost all of it. Even the county recommended it to
    streamline permit application and get around the setbacks and even
    get low rate construction loans and possibly even a grant. They even
    said if I just add a kitchen and a bath anywhere...it complies and I
    don't ever have to rent it which is the whole f'ing point of the ADU
    program. How f'd up is that?

    Austinites feel your pain. We have notoriously complicated building
    permit processing. "Permit expediter" is a thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 7 13:20:10 2023
    On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 5:48:11 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 3/6/23 10:33 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 1:19:21 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 3/5/23 8:08 PM, ScottW wrote:
    I live in the service area of the number 1 leading "renewable"
    sourced utility or at least they claim to be. My electric bill
    starting Jan 1 which is a bunch of BS smoke and mirrors trying
    obscure what they've done amounted to 50c/KwH. And I'm not using
    any power in their punitive tier pricing.
    I just saw a KUSI interview in which a consumer advocate lawyer
    explained the rates go up because the local utility makes money
    from capital projects, not from consumer energy use.

    So "renewable" isn't to blame, "new" is.

    LoL. A new solar farm to replace existing Nuclear and they tell us
    it will be cheaper.
    Sure, the electricity is. Paying for a new plant isn't.

    That's moronic beyond belief...even for you.

    Of course the nuclear infrastructure charge is included in the cost
    calc for the electricity it produces but the solar farm is magically exempt from including those costs.
    You should show your electric bill to Art. He can help you with
    fungibility concepts.
    You can talk all the stupid BS you want. I have the utility bills to
    prove it. They've been lying for a decade and are still lying but
    those hidden costs are eventually passed on to the consumers and that
    is just beginning. The impact is devastating to many middle and lower income families. I have a bill for 1000 Kwh....and it's 500$. The
    profits on infrastructure are buried in that bill...but they don't
    make more than a few % difference. It's a BS smokescreen.
    Well, that's how they guarantee their return to investors. Whether they
    have transparent billing is a separate issue.

    Stop the BS.... People are facing unaffordable utility bills.
    It's putting people in the streets.
    And you keep spewing the lies on costs.

    Germany just put a cap on utility rates at 40c/KwH.
    But their faced with a trillion or more in infrastructure costs for their transition plan.
    Those rates don't cover that cost.


    Austinites feel your pain. We have notoriously complicated building
    permit processing. "Permit expediter" is a thing.

    For a fee....a path for the rich. My first trips to the permit office went like this.
    First visit...we find out about the new zoning and tell the guy...that's not right.
    We did remodels twice and didn't face those setbacks.
    He said prove it. I told him I have the original plans and inspection records. Bring 'em in and we'll have something. So I did.
    He was surprised but I did. Original posted plans set with county stamps of approval
    and all the inspection records and final. He said, "This is great, you should have no problem
    getting your zone classification restored. Give me a minute to go upstairs and show this to
    my manager." Half hour later he returns looking embarrassed.
    Your request is denied. If you want to challenge it, here's the process.
    Fill out this stack of forms and submit payment of 6000$. We'll apply that money to the cost
    of reviewing the "situation". You may be required to submit additional payment for final results.
    No reimbursements even if the result is denial of your request.
    Only way I got the ok to go "with legal nonconforming" setbacks was by bitching to my county supervisor.
    Though we've yet to actually get permits so we don't even know if they'll honor that.
    I have a "memo" from a county engineer he says to include with my permit application.
    I'm inclined to shelve this project...but the wife wants it.
    Title 24 might be the nail in the coffin if we have to include the cost of a solar power system.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Tue Mar 7 15:56:39 2023
    On 3/7/23 3:20 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 5:48:11 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 3/6/23 10:33 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 1:19:21 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 3/5/23 8:08 PM, ScottW wrote:
    I live in the service area of the number 1 leading "renewable"
    sourced utility or at least they claim to be. My electric bill
    starting Jan 1 which is a bunch of BS smoke and mirrors trying
    obscure what they've done amounted to 50c/KwH. And I'm not using
    any power in their punitive tier pricing.
    I just saw a KUSI interview in which a consumer advocate lawyer
    explained the rates go up because the local utility makes money
    from capital projects, not from consumer energy use.

    So "renewable" isn't to blame, "new" is.

    LoL. A new solar farm to replace existing Nuclear and they tell us
    it will be cheaper.
    Sure, the electricity is. Paying for a new plant isn't.

    That's moronic beyond belief...even for you.

    Just trying to be clear. To be clearer still: they're charging you for
    new construction.

    Of course the nuclear infrastructure charge is included in the cost
    calc for the electricity it produces but the solar farm is magically
    exempt from including those costs.
    You should show your electric bill to Art. He can help you with
    fungibility concepts.
    You can talk all the stupid BS you want. I have the utility bills to
    prove it. They've been lying for a decade and are still lying but
    those hidden costs are eventually passed on to the consumers and that
    is just beginning. The impact is devastating to many middle and lower
    income families. I have a bill for 1000 Kwh....and it's 500$. The
    profits on infrastructure are buried in that bill...but they don't
    make more than a few % difference. It's a BS smokescreen.
    Well, that's how they guarantee their return to investors. Whether they
    have transparent billing is a separate issue.

    Stop the BS.... People are facing unaffordable utility bills.
    It's putting people in the streets.

    Yes, San Diego has famously high utility costs.

    And you keep spewing the lies on costs.

    What lies? Does your utility not pay for new construction by billing
    customers?

    Germany just put a cap on utility rates at 40c/KwH.

    But their faced with a trillion or more in infrastructure costs for their transition plan.
    Those rates don't cover that cost.

    Unlike those in San Diego, which do.

    I see. EU state aid will contribute:

    https://www.reuters.com/business/sustainable-business/eu-lay-out-green-industry-plan-counter-us-china-subsidies-2023-02-01/

    In Europe, to be clear.

    Austinites feel your pain. We have notoriously complicated building
    permit processing. "Permit expediter" is a thing.

    For a fee....a path for the rich.

    Those are the people who buy and build stuff.

    My first trips to the permit office went like this.
    First visit...we find out about the new zoning and tell the guy...that's not right.
    We did remodels twice and didn't face those setbacks.
    He said prove it. I told him I have the original plans and inspection records.
    Bring 'em in and we'll have something. So I did.
    He was surprised but I did. Original posted plans set with county stamps of approval
    and all the inspection records and final. He said, "This is great, you should have no problem
    getting your zone classification restored. Give me a minute to go upstairs and show this to
    my manager." Half hour later he returns looking embarrassed.
    Your request is denied. If you want to challenge it, here's the process.
    Fill out this stack of forms and submit payment of 6000$. We'll apply that money to the cost
    of reviewing the "situation". You may be required to submit additional payment for final results.
    No reimbursements even if the result is denial of your request.

    That's high-handed, alright.

    Only way I got the ok to go "with legal nonconforming" setbacks was by bitching to my county supervisor.
    Though we've yet to actually get permits so we don't even know if they'll honor that.
    I have a "memo" from a county engineer he says to include with my permit application.
    I'm inclined to shelve this project...but the wife wants it.
    Title 24 might be the nail in the coffin if we have to include the cost of a solar power system.

    Heat pumps are good things but the return is too long-term for many if
    not most homeowners.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 7 16:41:48 2023
    On Monday, March 6, 2023 at 4:19:21 PM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
    On 3/5/23 8:08 PM, ScottW wrote:
    I live in the service area of the number 1 leading "renewable"
    sourced utility or at least they claim to be. My electric bill
    starting Jan 1 which is a bunch of BS smoke and mirrors trying
    obscure what they've done amounted to 50c/KwH. And I'm not using any
    power in their punitive tier pricing.
    I just saw a KUSI interview in which a consumer advocate lawyer
    explained the rates go up because the local utility makes money from
    capital projects, not from consumer energy use.

    So "renewable" isn't to blame, "new" is.

    Finally, you are on to something I agree with your hesitancy to build NEW wind farms.
    NEW solar panel arrays, and NEW improvements to the grid. I also agree with you that we
    should keep costs down by banning EV'S, as they require all these expensive NEW capital projects
    to keep them on the road.
    Good job, Steve!!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)