https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.html
23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’
protests at planned police training site in Atlanta
On 3/6/23 11:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.html
23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’ protests at planned police training site in AtlantaNo, I don't remember that. Calling these protests "terrorism" is highly dubious.
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 8:38:00 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
On 3/6/23 11:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.html
let's see if the boxes are checked23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’ protests at planned police training site in AtlantaNo, I don't remember that. Calling these protests "terrorism" is highly dubious.
violent-checked
criminal-checked
individuals and/or group-checked
further ideological goals-checked
domestic influences of political nature-checked
domestic influences of social nature-checked
domestic influences of environmental nature-checked
from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 8:38:00 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
On 3/6/23 11:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.htmlNo, I don't remember that. Calling these protests "terrorism" is highly
23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’
protests at planned police training site in Atlanta
dubious.
let's see if the boxes are checked
violent-checked
criminal-checked
individuals and/or group-checked
further ideological goals-checked
domestic influences of political nature-checked
domestic influences of social nature-checked
domestic influences of environmental nature-checked
from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
On 3/7/23 2:47 PM, Art Sackman wrote:religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 8:38:00 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
On 3/6/23 11:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.html >>>No, I don't remember that. Calling these protests "terrorism" is highly >> dubious.
23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’
protests at planned police training site in Atlanta
let's see if the boxes are checked
violent-checked
criminal-checked
individuals and/or group-checked
further ideological goals-checked
domestic influences of political nature-checked
domestic influences of social nature-checked
domestic influences of environmental nature-checked
from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
The FBI isn't bringing charges, and if it did, it wouldn't cite wiki to
do so. More like this:
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-4/16-4-10/
(a) As used in this Code section, "domestic terrorism" means any
violation of, or attempt to violate, the laws of this state or of the
United States which:
(1) Is intended or reasonably likely to injure or kill not less than ten individuals as part of a single unlawful act or a series of unlawful
acts which are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics; and
(2)(A) Is intended to intimidate the civilian population of this state,
any of its political subdivisions, or of the United States;
(B) Is intended to alter, change, or coerce the policy of the government
of this state or any of its political subdivisions by intimidation or coercion; or
(C) Is intended to affect the conduct of the government of this state or
any of its political subdivisions by use of destructive devices, assassination, or kidnapping.
End quote.
Yes, highly dubious and shows prosecutorial overreach. "To intimidate"
and "to coerce" is hopelessly broad and runs afoul of the First Amendment.
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 1:44:34 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
On 3/7/23 2:47 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 8:38:00 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
On 3/6/23 11:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.html >>>>>No, I don't remember that. Calling these protests "terrorism" is highly >>>> dubious.
23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’
protests at planned police training site in Atlanta
let's see if the boxes are checked
violent-checked
criminal-checked
individuals and/or group-checked
further ideological goals-checked
domestic influences of political nature-checked
domestic influences of social nature-checked
domestic influences of environmental nature-checked
from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
The FBI isn't bringing charges, and if it did, it wouldn't cite wiki to
do so. More like this:
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-4/16-4-10/
(a) As used in this Code section, "domestic terrorism" means any
violation of, or attempt to violate, the laws of this state or of the
United States which:
(1) Is intended or reasonably likely to injure or kill not less than ten
individuals as part of a single unlawful act or a series of unlawful
acts which are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics; and
(2)(A) Is intended to intimidate the civilian population of this state,
any of its political subdivisions, or of the United States;
(B) Is intended to alter, change, or coerce the policy of the government
of this state or any of its political subdivisions by intimidation or
coercion; or
(C) Is intended to affect the conduct of the government of this state or
any of its political subdivisions by use of destructive devices,
assassination, or kidnapping.
End quote.
Yes, highly dubious and shows prosecutorial overreach. "To intimidate"
and "to coerce" is hopelessly broad and runs afoul of the First Amendment.
Acts of violence are not protected by the First Amendment.
That's the dumbest line I've heard from you in a while....and that's hard to do.
On 3/7/23 3:59 PM, ScottW wrote:religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 1:44:34 PM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 3/7/23 2:47 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 8:38:00 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
On 3/6/23 11:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.html >>>>>No, I don't remember that. Calling these protests "terrorism" is highly >>>> dubious.
23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’ >>>>> protests at planned police training site in Atlanta
let's see if the boxes are checked
violent-checked
criminal-checked
individuals and/or group-checked
further ideological goals-checked
domestic influences of political nature-checked
domestic influences of social nature-checked
domestic influences of environmental nature-checked
from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
The FBI isn't bringing charges, and if it did, it wouldn't cite wiki to >> do so. More like this:
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-4/16-4-10/
(a) As used in this Code section, "domestic terrorism" means any
violation of, or attempt to violate, the laws of this state or of the
United States which:
(1) Is intended or reasonably likely to injure or kill not less than ten >> individuals as part of a single unlawful act or a series of unlawful
acts which are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics; and
(2)(A) Is intended to intimidate the civilian population of this state, >> any of its political subdivisions, or of the United States;
(B) Is intended to alter, change, or coerce the policy of the government >> of this state or any of its political subdivisions by intimidation or
coercion; or
(C) Is intended to affect the conduct of the government of this state or >> any of its political subdivisions by use of destructive devices,
assassination, or kidnapping.
End quote.
Yes, highly dubious and shows prosecutorial overreach. "To intimidate"
and "to coerce" is hopelessly broad and runs afoul of the First Amendment.
Acts of violence are not protected by the First Amendment.That's why I specified "to intimidate" and "to coerce" from the language
of the statute.
Violent acts are chargeable under other statutes.
That's the dumbest line I've heard from you in a while....and that's hard to do.No, it's easy to gaslight with constant belittling replies.
On 3/7/23 2:47 PM, Art Sackman wrote:religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 8:38:00 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
On 3/6/23 11:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.html >>>No, I don't remember that. Calling these protests "terrorism" is highly >> dubious.
23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’
protests at planned police training site in Atlanta
let's see if the boxes are checked
violent-checked
criminal-checked
individuals and/or group-checked
further ideological goals-checked
domestic influences of political nature-checked
domestic influences of social nature-checked
domestic influences of environmental nature-checked
from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
The FBI isn't bringing charges, and if it did, it wouldn't cite wiki to
do so.
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-4/16-4-10/
(a) As used in this Code section, "domestic terrorism" means any
violation of, or attempt to violate, the laws of this state or of the
United States which:
(1) Is intended or reasonably likely to injure or kill not less than ten individuals as part of a single unlawful act or a series of unlawful
acts which are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics; and
(2)(A) Is intended to intimidate the civilian population of this state,
any of its political subdivisions, or of the United States;
(B) Is intended to alter, change, or coerce the policy of the government
of this state or any of its political subdivisions by intimidation or coercion; or
(C) Is intended to affect the conduct of the government of this state or
any of its political subdivisions by use of destructive devices, assassination, or kidnapping.
End quote.
Yes, highly dubious and shows prosecutorial overreach. "To intimidate"
and "to coerce" is hopelessly broad and runs afoul of the First Amendment.
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 4:44:34 PM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
On 3/7/23 2:47 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, March 7, 2023 at 8:38:00 AM UTC-5, mINE109 wrote:
On 3/6/23 11:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://www.cnn.com/2023/03/06/us/atlanta-cop-city-protests/index.html >>>>>No, I don't remember that. Calling these protests "terrorism" is highly >>>> dubious.
23 face domestic terrorism charges after arrests in ‘Cop City’
protests at planned police training site in Atlanta
let's see if the boxes are checked
violent-checked
criminal-checked
individuals and/or group-checked
further ideological goals-checked
domestic influences of political nature-checked
domestic influences of social nature-checked
domestic influences of environmental nature-checked
from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
The FBI isn't bringing charges, and if it did, it wouldn't cite wiki to
do so.
Garland is as much of an ignorant partisan as you are
More like this:
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-4/16-4-10/
(a) As used in this Code section, "domestic terrorism" means any
violation of, or attempt to violate, the laws of this state or of the
United States which:
(1) Is intended or reasonably likely to injure or kill not less than ten
individuals as part of a single unlawful act or a series of unlawful
acts which are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics; and
(2)(A) Is intended to intimidate the civilian population of this state,
any of its political subdivisions, or of the United States;
(B) Is intended to alter, change, or coerce the policy of the government
of this state or any of its political subdivisions by intimidation or
coercion; or
(C) Is intended to affect the conduct of the government of this state or
any of its political subdivisions by use of destructive devices,
assassination, or kidnapping.
End quote.
Yes, highly dubious and shows prosecutorial overreach. "To intimidate"
and "to coerce" is hopelessly broad and runs afoul of the First Amendment.
You FUCKING MORON!! To intimidate and coerce by threat of force is certainly NOT protected Constitutional speech. And if it were, it would be applied equally
to left and right.
According to your analysis, it would be perfectly alright for me to come on down to Austin, confront you, and threaten to beat your brains in with a baseball bat, unless you
recanted your political views. According to you, that would be my First Amendment
right to free speech.
religious, social, racial, or environmental nature.from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
The FBI isn't bringing charges, and if it did, it wouldn't cite wiki to >> do so.
Garland is as much of an ignorant partisan as you areNot applicable. This is a state-level prosecution. The partisans
involved are Governor Kemp and the GBI.
https://truthout.org/articles/domestic-terrorism-charges-against-cop-city-demonstrators-spur-further-protests/
Micah Herskind: “We’ve seen sweeping repressions, mass arrests, overzealous criminal prosecutions and over 40 people have been charged
with domestic terrorism, many for things that amount to no more than criminal trespass. …You can recognize that that on its face is
ridiculous. Charging protesters who are part of a social movement with domestic terrorism is a dangerous sign of where things are going when it comes to police repression of our movements.”
More like this:
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-4/16-4-10/
(a) As used in this Code section, "domestic terrorism" means any
violation of, or attempt to violate, the laws of this state or of the
United States which:
(1) Is intended or reasonably likely to injure or kill not less than ten >> individuals as part of a single unlawful act or a series of unlawful
acts which are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics; and
(2)(A) Is intended to intimidate the civilian population of this state, >> any of its political subdivisions, or of the United States;
(B) Is intended to alter, change, or coerce the policy of the government >> of this state or any of its political subdivisions by intimidation or
coercion; or
(C) Is intended to affect the conduct of the government of this state or >> any of its political subdivisions by use of destructive devices,
assassination, or kidnapping.
End quote.
Yes, highly dubious and shows prosecutorial overreach. "To intimidate"
and "to coerce" is hopelessly broad and runs afoul of the First Amendment.
You FUCKING MORON!! To intimidate and coerce by threat of force is certainlyWhere did I say "by threat of force"? Strawman.
NOT protected Constitutional speech. And if it were, it would be applied equally
to left and right.
According to your analysis, it would be perfectly alright for me to come on
down to Austin, confront you, and threaten to beat your brains in with a baseball bat, unless you
recanted your political views. According to you, that would be my First Amendment
right to free speech.
Are you threatening me?
Oreligious, social, racial, or environmental nature.
from Wiki:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines domestic terrorism as violent, criminal acts which are committed by individuals and/or groups in order to further ideological goals stemming from domestic influences, such as those of a political,
Not applicable. This is a state-level prosecution. The partisansThe FBI isn't bringing charges, and if it did, it wouldn't cite wiki to >>>> do so.
Garland is as much of an ignorant partisan as you are
involved are Governor Kemp and the GBI.
You dirty ass lying gaslighting motherfucker, you are the one who brought up the Feds,
then, when I respond to it, you try telling me the Feds ae not applicable.
https://truthout.org/articles/domestic-terrorism-charges-against-cop-city-demonstrators-spur-further-protests/
Micah Herskind: “We’ve seen sweeping repressions, mass arrests,
overzealous criminal prosecutions and over 40 people have been charged
with domestic terrorism, many for things that amount to no more than
criminal trespass. …You can recognize that that on its face is
ridiculous. Charging protesters who are part of a social movement with
domestic terrorism is a dangerous sign of where things are going when it
comes to police repression of our movements.”
Quoting a left wing woke Antifa apologist asshole just doesn't cut it.
You are backing up your ignorant opinion with another asinine opinion
More like this:Where did I say "by threat of force"? Strawman.
You FUCKING MORON!! To intimidate and coerce by threat of force is certainly
https://law.justia.com/codes/georgia/2010/title-16/chapter-4/16-4-10/
(a) As used in this Code section, "domestic terrorism" means any
violation of, or attempt to violate, the laws of this state or of the
United States which:
(1) Is intended or reasonably likely to injure or kill not less than ten >>>> individuals as part of a single unlawful act or a series of unlawful
acts which are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics; and
(2)(A) Is intended to intimidate the civilian population of this state, >>>> any of its political subdivisions, or of the United States;
(B) Is intended to alter, change, or coerce the policy of the government >>>> of this state or any of its political subdivisions by intimidation or
coercion; or
(C) Is intended to affect the conduct of the government of this state or >>>> any of its political subdivisions by use of destructive devices,
assassination, or kidnapping.
End quote.
Yes, highly dubious and shows prosecutorial overreach. "To intimidate" >>>> and "to coerce" is hopelessly broad and runs afoul of the First Amendment. >>>
NOT protected Constitutional speech. And if it were, it would be applied equally
to left and right.
Read the fucking Georgia law you quoted, you fucking retard. That is EXACTLY what threat of force is,
here are some keywords:
"intended to injure or kill"
"destructive devices, assassination or kidnapping"
"intended to affect the conduct of government"
"intended to coerce the policy of government"
"intended to intimidate"
According to your analysis, it would be perfectly alright for me to come on >>> down to Austin, confront you, and threaten to beat your brains in with a baseball bat, unless you
recanted your political views. According to you, that would be my First Amendment
right to free speech.
Are you threatening me?
GOTCHA!!!!!!!!
Using threat of force or violence. That's exactly what the terrorists are doing.
But of course, in your perverted little world,
its fine and dandy if your political allies do it to your opponents, but
just horrible when your opponents do it to you.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 493 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 14:03:26 |
| Calls: | 9,711 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 13,740 |
| Messages: | 6,181,697 |