1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.AUDIO.OPINION

  • This denial is laughable

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 28 08:56:04 2023
    “Our reporter did not submit any questions in advance of the Q&A with President Biden. Courtney Subramanian covers the White House for the Los Angeles Times. As such, she is in regular contact with the White House press office seeking information for
    her reporting. You would have to ask the White House who prepared the document for the president and why they included that question.”

    and now the lying LATimes thinks you're stupid.

    Go ahead Stephen, prove them right.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Apr 28 10:31:39 2023
    On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 11:56:06 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    “Our reporter did not submit any questions in advance of the Q&A with President Biden. Courtney Subramanian covers the White House for the Los Angeles Times. As such, she is in regular contact with the White House press office seeking information for
    her reporting. You would have to ask the White House who prepared the document for the president and why they included that question.”

    and now the lying LATimes thinks you're stupid.

    Go ahead Stephen, prove them right.

    ScottW

    Notice the 'escape hatch'
    “Our reporter did not submit any questions in advance"
    maybe someone else at the paper did it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Apr 28 16:24:11 2023
    On 4/28/23 10:56 AM, ScottW wrote:
    “Our reporter did not submit any questions in advance of the Q&A with President Biden. Courtney Subramanian covers the White House for the
    Los Angeles Times. As such, she is in regular contact with the White
    House press office seeking information for her reporting. You would
    have to ask the White House who prepared the document for the
    president and why they included that question.”

    and now the lying LATimes thinks you're stupid.

    Go ahead Stephen, prove them right.

    Stupid is your focus on this non-subject.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Fri Apr 28 19:37:40 2023
    On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 10:31:41 AM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 11:56:06 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    “Our reporter did not submit any questions in advance of the Q&A with President Biden. Courtney Subramanian covers the White House for the Los Angeles Times. As such, she is in regular contact with the White House press office seeking information
    for her reporting. You would have to ask the White House who prepared the document for the president and why they included that question.”

    and now the lying LATimes thinks you're stupid.

    Go ahead Stephen, prove them right.

    ScottW
    Notice the 'escape hatch'
    “Our reporter did not submit any questions in advance"
    maybe someone else at the paper did it.

    Nope, the paper denied that possibility.
    Best theory that fits the narrative from both sides
    did not occur to me...but makes sense.

    The WH gave the reporter the question to ask.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 28 19:41:42 2023
    On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:24:13 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 4/28/23 10:56 AM, ScottW wrote:
    “Our reporter did not submit any questions in advance of the Q&A with President Biden. Courtney Subramanian covers the White House for the
    Los Angeles Times. As such, she is in regular contact with the White
    House press office seeking information for her reporting. You would
    have to ask the White House who prepared the document for the
    president and why they included that question.”

    and now the lying LATimes thinks you're stupid.

    Go ahead Stephen, prove them right.
    Stupid is your focus on this non-subject.

    Yes, we know you think collusion between the WH and the WH Press corp. is no big deal.
    A grand facade is the perfect way to craft public opinion.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Apr 29 09:03:14 2023
    On 4/28/23 9:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 2:24:13 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 4/28/23 10:56 AM, ScottW wrote:
    “Our reporter did not submit any questions in advance of the Q&A with
    President Biden. Courtney Subramanian covers the White House for the
    Los Angeles Times. As such, she is in regular contact with the White
    House press office seeking information for her reporting. You would
    have to ask the White House who prepared the document for the
    president and why they included that question.”

    and now the lying LATimes thinks you're stupid.

    Go ahead Stephen, prove them right.
    Stupid is your focus on this non-subject.

    Yes, we know you think collusion between the WH and the WH Press corp. is no big deal.

    It's not a big deal for the WH to invite questions on certain subjects, something like, 'the President will talk about x, please have questions
    on x.'

    A grand facade is the perfect way to craft public opinion.

    Like the fringe to Fox pipeline?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)