The Sack-Shmoo's epic meltdown was memorable. Congrats.
The Sack-Shmoo's epic meltdown was memorable. Congrats.Stephanie is hiding it in her tuck'
Not better, but worse.
You're teetering. Incoherent babbling is a loud klaxon.
The Sack-Shmoo's epic meltdown was memorable. Congrats.Stephanie is hiding it in her tuck'
On 5/24/23 12:48 AM, Fascist Flea wrote:
Not better, but worse.He's reeling from the discovery Target sells a swimsuit for adults with "extra crotch coverage" in a temporary Pride section.
You're teetering. Incoherent babbling is a loud klaxon.
The Sack-Shmoo's epic meltdown was memorable. Congrats.Stephanie is hiding it in her tuck'
On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 10:59:15 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/24/23 12:48 AM, Fascist Flea wrote:
Not better, but worse.He's reeling from the discovery Target sells a swimsuit for adults with
You're teetering. Incoherent babbling is a loud klaxon.
The Sack-Shmoo's epic meltdown was memorable. Congrats.Stephanie is hiding it in her tuck'
"extra crotch coverage" in a temporary Pride section.
If I had some extra crotch, I wouldn't be trying to hide it.
He's reeling from the discovery Target sells a swimsuit for adults with "extra crotch coverage" in a temporary Pride section.
He's reeling from the discovery Target sells a swimsuit for adults
with "extra crotch coverage" in a temporary Pride section.
In your case, they are "TARGET"ing a tiny market niche.
Your demand for tuck space is not a "big thing"
It's entirely unnecessary for your swimwear, as cold water will
provide adequate shrinkage, if any is needed at all.
He's reeling from the discovery Target sells a swimsuit for adults
with "extra crotch coverage" in a temporary Pride section.
In your case, they are "TARGET"ing a tiny market niche.Yes, it's a single item, part of a seasonal promotion.
Your demand for tuck space is not a "big thing"It's not for "tuck space." It's clearly labeled "coverage." You're
getting info from people who think an adult item is for children and
don't understand the concept of lining.
It's entirely unnecessary for your swimwear, as cold water willCoverage is good in public. I'm surprised you're against it.
provide adequate shrinkage, if any is needed at all.
Thuggery advances at the expense of tolerance.
The latest:
Target removes some Pride Month products after facing threats
Target will remove some of its LGBTQ+ merchandise from its Pride
Month collection after facing backlash that threatened the safety
of its workers, the company said.
...
The company did not specify which items were being removed, but misinformation in recent days has centered on its children’s bathing
suits that were falsely labeled as “tuck-friendly” by prominent conservative groups and media outlets. The tuck-friendly swimming
suits were only for adults, the Associated Press reported. Tuck-friendly swimwear offers extra coverage to allow trans women without
gender-affirming operations to conceal their genitalia.
washingtonpost.com (conveniently paywalled to keep idiots out)
Next time anyone wants to light Shmoo-Sack's fuse, use the handy
phrase "gender-affirming operations". That notion invariably ignites
a volcanic spew of "mutilating children" horror scenarios.
Thuggery advances at the expense of tolerance.
He's reeling from the discovery Target sells a swimsuit for adults
with "extra crotch coverage" in a temporary Pride section.
In your case, they are "TARGET"ing a tiny market niche.Yes, it's a single item, part of a seasonal promotion.
Your demand for tuck space is not a "big thing"It's not for "tuck space." It's clearly labeled "coverage." You're
getting info from people who think an adult item is for children and
don't understand the concept of lining.
It's entirely unnecessary for your swimwear, as cold water willCoverage is good in public. I'm surprised you're against it.
provide adequate shrinkage, if any is needed at all.
The latest:
Target removes some Pride Month products after facing threats
Target will remove some of its LGBTQ+ merchandise from its Pride
Month collection after facing backlash that threatened the safety
of its workers, the company said.
...
The company did not specify which items were being removed, but misinformation in recent days has centered on its children’s bathing
suits that were falsely labeled as “tuck-friendly” by prominent conservative groups and media outlets. The tuck-friendly swimming
suits were only for adults, the Associated Press reported. Tuck-friendly swimwear offers extra coverage to allow trans women without
gender-affirming operations to conceal their genitalia.
washingtonpost.com (conveniently paywalled to keep idiots out)
Next time anyone wants to light Shmoo-Sack's fuse, use the handy
phrase "gender-affirming operations". That notion invariably ignites
a volcanic spew of "mutilating children" horror scenarios.
On 5/24/23 12:58 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
Thuggery advances at the expense of tolerance.
The latest:
Target removes some Pride Month products after facing threats
Target will remove some of its LGBTQ+ merchandise from its Pride
Month collection after facing backlash that threatened the safety
of its workers, the company said.
...
The company did not specify which items were being removed, but misinformation in recent days has centered on its children’s bathing suits that were falsely labeled as “tuck-friendly” by prominent conservative groups and media outlets. The tuck-friendly swimming
suits were only for adults, the Associated Press reported. Tuck-friendly swimwear offers extra coverage to allow trans women without gender-affirming operations to conceal their genitalia.
washingtonpost.com (conveniently paywalled to keep idiots out)
Next time anyone wants to light Shmoo-Sack's fuse, use the handyWonkette has a recap, too, with snark. More Matt Walsh and "Gays against groomers" than I want to see.
phrase "gender-affirming operations". That notion invariably ignites
a volcanic spew of "mutilating children" horror scenarios.
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want to live and
let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide to shove this garbage in our face, they should know that they’ll pay a price. It won’t be worth whatever they think they’ll gain. First Bud Light and now Target. Our campaign is making progress. Let’s keep it going."''I
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want to live and let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide to shove this garbage in our face, they should know that they’ll pay a price.
I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on Twitter
Nobody is shoving anything i your face. You are an adult, you can go down to your local club and see a drag show. You can buy your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+ specialty shops
On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 2:44:20 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/24/23 12:58 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
Next time anyone wants to light Shmoo-Sack's fuse, use the handyWonkette has a recap, too, with snark. More Matt Walsh and "Gays
phrase "gender-affirming operations". That notion invariably
ignites a volcanic spew of "mutilating children" horror
scenarios.
against groomers" than I want to see.
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want to live
and let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide to
shove this garbage in our face, they should know that they’ll pay a
price. It won’t be worth whatever they think they’ll gain. First
Bud Light and now Target. Our campaign is making progress. Let’s
keep it going."''I
I don't write Walsh's tweets. I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on
Nobody is shoving anything i your face.
You are an adult, you can go down toyour local club and see a drag
show. You can buy your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+
specialty shops
The Sack o' Shmoo is verrrrry confused.
That may explain why you're trying to reply to Walsh's tweet on RAO.
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want to live and let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide to shove >>> this garbage in our face, they should know that they’ll pay a price.
I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on Twitter
Why on Mars would you imagine Walsh is going to see your reply here?
Nobody is shoving anything i your face. You are an adult, you can go down to >> your local club and see a drag show. You can buy your tuckware clothing at >> local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+ specialty shops
How stupid are you, really?
On 5/25/23 11:27 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
The Sack o' Shmoo is verrrrry confused.It's not clear he knows who Matt Walsh is! Is he reading this as Walsh defending Target instead of as Walsh stating his goals?
That may explain why you're trying to reply to Walsh's tweet on RAO.
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want to live and let live:I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on Twitter
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide to shove
this garbage in our face, they should know that they’ll pay a price. >>
Why on Mars would you imagine Walsh is going to see your reply here?
Nobody is shoving anything i your face. You are an adult, you can go down to
your local club and see a drag show. You can buy your tuckware clothing at
local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+ specialty shops
How stupid are you, really?
I guess we now know which of them reads Daily Wire and which doesn't.
On 5/25/23 10:43 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 2:44:20 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/24/23 12:58 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
Next time anyone wants to light Shmoo-Sack's fuse, use the handyWonkette has a recap, too, with snark. More Matt Walsh and "Gays
phrase "gender-affirming operations". That notion invariably
ignites a volcanic spew of "mutilating children" horror
scenarios.
against groomers" than I want to see.
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want to live
and let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide to
shove this garbage in our face, they should know that they’ll pay a
price. It won’t be worth whatever they think they’ll gain. First
Bud Light and now Target. Our campaign is making progress. Let’s
keep it going."''I
I don't write Walsh's tweets. I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on TwitterThat's why I quoted it, so you could see what I'm talking about. Do you think he is willing to "live and let live"?
Nobody is shoving anything i your face.I assure the you the cis-het world-view is omnipresent.
You are an adult, you can go down toyour local club and see a dragIf thugs can shut down a Pride display at Target, the specialty shop is next.
show. You can buy your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+
specialty shops
On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 10:58:45 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/25/23 10:43 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, May 24, 2023 at 2:44:20 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:That's why I quoted it, so you could see what I'm talking about. Do you
On 5/24/23 12:58 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
Next time anyone wants to light Shmoo-Sack's fuse, use the handyWonkette has a recap, too, with snark. More Matt Walsh and "Gays
phrase "gender-affirming operations". That notion invariably
ignites a volcanic spew of "mutilating children" horror
scenarios.
against groomers" than I want to see.
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want to live
and let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide to
shove this garbage in our face, they should know that they’ll pay a
price. It won’t be worth whatever they think they’ll gain. First
Bud Light and now Target. Our campaign is making progress. Let’s
keep it going."''I
I don't write Walsh's tweets. I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on
think he is willing to "live and let live"?
I have no idea.
Nobody is shoving anything i your face.I assure the you the cis-het world-view is omnipresent.
Not at Target and Dodgers Stadium
You are an adult, you can go down toyour local club and see a dragIf thugs can shut down a Pride display at Target, the specialty shop is
show. You can buy your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+
specialty shops
next.
We are not thugs.
Thugs are the ones who trash right to life displays and chase reporters with a machete.
We have no interest in shutting down alternative specialty shops.
We just want to protect families and children shopping at main line chains stores.
Families and children need safe spaces when shopping.
On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 11:15:35 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/25/23 11:27 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
The Sack o' Shmoo is verrrrry confused.It's not clear he knows who Matt Walsh is! Is he reading this as
That may explain why you're trying to reply to Walsh's tweet on
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want
to live and let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide
to shove this garbage in our face, they should know that
they’ll pay a price.
I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on Twitter
RAO.
Why on Mars would you imagine Walsh is going to see your reply
Nobody is shoving anything i your face. You are an adult, you
can go down to your local club and see a drag show. You can buy
your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+ specialty shops
here? How stupid are you, really?
Walsh defending Target instead of as Walsh stating his goals?
I guess we now know which of them reads Daily Wire and which
doesn't.
I don't know what Walsh reads.
I read the Daily Wire occasionally. It is included in the expansive
array of my diverse reading material.
On 5/26/23 2:24 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 11:15:35 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/25/23 11:27 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
The Sack o' Shmoo is verrrrry confused.It's not clear he knows who Matt Walsh is! Is he reading this as
That may explain why you're trying to reply to Walsh's tweet on
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want
to live and let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide >>>>> to shove this garbage in our face, they should know that
they’ll pay a price.
I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on Twitter
RAO.
Why on Mars would you imagine Walsh is going to see your reply
Nobody is shoving anything i your face. You are an adult, you
can go down to your local club and see a drag show. You can buy
your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+ specialty shops
here? How stupid are you, really?
Walsh defending Target instead of as Walsh stating his goals?
I guess we now know which of them reads Daily Wire and which
doesn't.
I don't know what Walsh reads.I refer to you and Scott. Why would Walsh read himself?
I read the Daily Wire occasionally. It is included in the expansiveYou'll find he has a column there. On the plus side for you, your
array of my diverse reading material.
sympathies may be partially excused since you're ignorant of the worst extremists on the right.
The Dodgers were founded in 1896, so games without "Pride Night" greatly outnumber the ten or so with.
Or do you mean any non-cis-het representation is a problem?
You are an adult, you can go down toyour local club and see a dragIf thugs can shut down a Pride display at Target, the specialty shop is >> next.
show. You can buy your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+
specialty shops
We are not thugs.Why are you identifying with the thugs?
Thugs are the ones who trash right to life displays and chase reporters with a machete.
That's an oddly restricted definition, one not shared by many.
We have no interest in shutting down alternative specialty shops.If you get Target, you'll move on to whatever bondage wear emporia you
can find.
We just want to protect families and children shopping at main line chains stores.
Families and children need safe spaces when shopping.
There's nothing unsafe about LGBTQ representation. And I don't see a
similar concern that non-cis-het kids be protected from cis-het culture.
On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 7:37:18 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/26/23 2:24 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 11:15:35 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:I refer to you and Scott. Why would Walsh read himself?
On 5/25/23 11:27 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
The Sack o' Shmoo is verrrrry confused.It's not clear he knows who Matt Walsh is! Is he reading this as
That may explain why you're trying to reply to Walsh's tweet on
Let's see how Walsh's tweet aligns with Art's claim to want
to live and let live:
"The goal is to make “pride” toxic for brands. If they decide >>>>>>> to shove this garbage in our face, they should know that
they’ll pay a price.
I don't read Walsh's tweets I am not on Twitter
RAO.
Why on Mars would you imagine Walsh is going to see your reply
Nobody is shoving anything i your face. You are an adult, you
can go down to your local club and see a drag show. You can buy
your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+ specialty shops
here? How stupid are you, really?
Walsh defending Target instead of as Walsh stating his goals?
I guess we now know which of them reads Daily Wire and which
doesn't.
I don't know what Walsh reads.
I read the Daily Wire occasionally. It is included in the expansiveYou'll find he has a column there. On the plus side for you, your
array of my diverse reading material.
sympathies may be partially excused since you're ignorant of the worst
extremists on the right.
I know some of the most extreme , I am not ignorant of them, and I
mostly avoid them, so I don't know what they have been writing recently. Examples: Coulter, Sailer, Alex Jones, and Paul Joseph Watson
On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 7:32:47 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:At the time of the Civil War, it was 19 free states to 15 slave
The Dodgers were founded in 1896, so games without "Pride Night" greatly
outnumber the ten or so with.
Stats are a lovely thing.
The States that banned slavery greatly outnumber the eleven or so that were slave states.
Or do you mean any non-cis-het representation is a problem?
Why are you identifying with the thugs?You are an adult, you can go down toyour local club and see a dragIf thugs can shut down a Pride display at Target, the specialty shop is >>>> next.
show. You can buy your tuckware clothing at local LGBTQTSGFXYZ+
specialty shops
We are not thugs.
You fucking ignorant moron. I just told you that people opposed to
'the Target Pride display are NOT thugs.
Thugs are the ones who trash right to life displays and chase reporters with a machete.
That's an oddly restricted definition, one not shared by many.
That is not a definition and not restrctive.
it us an EXAMPLW
You are far exceeding your usual level of stupidity and nincompoopedness tonight.
We have no interest in shutting down alternative specialty shops.If you get Target, you'll move on to whatever bondage wear emporia you
can find.
We just want to protect families and children shopping at main line chains stores.
Families and children need safe spaces when shopping.
There's nothing unsafe about LGBTQ representation. And I don't see a
similar concern that non-cis-het kids be protected from cis-het culture.
There is nothing unsafe about criticizing the LGBTQ+Whatever Else movement.
There is nothing unsafe about telling trans activists that they are ridiculous fools
Maybe they don't see the nuance when you tell them they shouldn't exist
in society.
On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 4:15:54 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Maybe they don't see the nuance when you tell them they shouldn't exist
in society.
Who said that?
I just want them out of elementary and high schools.
On 5/27/23 7:48 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 4:15:54 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Maybe they don't see the nuance when you tell them they shouldn't exist >> in society.
Who said that?That's a good example of what I mean.
I just want them out of elementary and high schools.
I'm not talking about as young students. I'm talking about adult drag queens. They have no business plying their trade in public schools
On Sunday, May 28, 2023 at 7:47:16 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/27/23 7:48 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 4:15:54 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:That's a good example of what I mean.
Maybe they don't see the nuance when you tell them they shouldn't exist >>>> in society.
Who said that?
I just want them out of elementary and high schools.
I'm not talking about as young students. I'm talking about adult drag queens. They have no business plying their trade in public schools
On 5/28/23 11:21 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2023 at 7:47:16 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/27/23 7:48 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 4:15:54 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:That's a good example of what I mean.
Maybe they don't see the nuance when you tell them they shouldn't exist >>>> in society.
Who said that?
I just want them out of elementary and high schools.
I'm not talking about as young students. I'm talking about adult drag queens.They don't "ply their trade in schools." Drag is a specific art form in specific locations, not schools. However, an age-appropriate show that includes drag is not a problem in schools:
They have no business plying their trade in public schools
https://broadwayeducators.com/kinky-boots-not-so-kinky-themes/
https://www.playbill.com/article/watch-a-new-york-high-school-remounts-the-original-broadway-production-of-hairspray
Etc.
At best, you're mixing up schools and the successful age-appropriate
Drag Story Hour marketed to libraries.
At best, you're mixing up schools and the successful age-appropriatedrag shows are not age appropriate for children. They are for adults
Drag Story Hour marketed to libraries.
On Sunday, May 28, 2023 at 2:20:08 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/28/23 11:21 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2023 at 7:47:16 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:They don't "ply their trade in schools." Drag is a specific art form in
On 5/27/23 7:48 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 4:15:54 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:That's a good example of what I mean.
Maybe they don't see the nuance when you tell them they shouldn't exist >>>>>> in society.
Who said that?
I just want them out of elementary and high schools.
I'm not talking about as young students. I'm talking about adult drag queens.
They have no business plying their trade in public schools
specific locations, not schools. However, an age-appropriate show that
includes drag is not a problem in schools:
https://broadwayeducators.com/kinky-boots-not-so-kinky-themes/
https://www.playbill.com/article/watch-a-new-york-high-school-remounts-the-original-broadway-production-of-hairspray
Etc.
At best, you're mixing up schools and the successful age-appropriate
Drag Story Hour marketed to libraries.
drag shows are not age appropriate for children. They are for adults
On 5/28/23 10:56 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2023 at 2:20:08 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/28/23 11:21 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, May 28, 2023 at 7:47:16 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:They don't "ply their trade in schools." Drag is a specific art form in >> specific locations, not schools. However, an age-appropriate show that
On 5/27/23 7:48 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 4:15:54 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:That's a good example of what I mean.
Maybe they don't see the nuance when you tell them they shouldn't exist
in society.
Who said that?
I just want them out of elementary and high schools.
I'm not talking about as young students. I'm talking about adult drag queens.
They have no business plying their trade in public schools
includes drag is not a problem in schools:
https://broadwayeducators.com/kinky-boots-not-so-kinky-themes/
https://www.playbill.com/article/watch-a-new-york-high-school-remounts-the-original-broadway-production-of-hairspray
Etc.
At best, you're mixing up schools and the successful age-appropriate
Drag Story Hour marketed to libraries.
drag shows are not age appropriate for children. They are for adultsDrag Story Hour isn't a "drag show." It's a children's activity, a book reading, with a performer in drag, although I'm sure your sources are
happy to mix you up by illustrating stories about libraries with video
from discos, drag bars and the like.
Children are already barred from adult drag shows in nightclubs.
You've reminded me of an elementary school teacher from back in the day
who wore garish makeup and wigs, a woman in "drag." Think Mimi in The
Drew Carey Show.
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess parties," sports mascots, etc.
You've reminded me of an elementary school teacher from back in the day
who wore garish makeup and wigs, a woman in "drag." Think Mimi in The
Drew Carey Show.
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess parties," sports mascots, etc.
You've reminded me of an elementary school teacher from back in the day
who wore garish makeup and wigs, a woman in "drag."
You've reminded me of an elementary school teacher from back in the day
who wore garish makeup and wigs, a woman in "drag." Think Mimi in The
Drew Carey Show.
I try NOT to think of Mimi
This is just GREAT for kids What a role model!!!
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess
parties," sports mascots, etc.
NONE of those involve sexualization.
But even clowns can be dangerous
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 8:24:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess
parties," sports mascots, etc.
For adult viewing, dog shit eating Devine was funny, but not appropriate for kids.
You've reminded me of an elementary school teacher from back in the day
who wore garish makeup and wigs, a woman in "drag."
Oh dear!! So, you were exposed to drag queens in elementary school.
No wonder you are so fucked up.
On 5/29/23 1:32 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 8:24:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess
parties," sports mascots, etc.
For adult viewing, dog shit eating Devine was funny, but not appropriate for kids.Hence the movie rating upon rerelease.
On 5/29/23 1:26 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
You've reminded me of an elementary school teacher from back in the day >> who wore garish makeup and wigs, a woman in "drag." Think Mimi in The
Drew Carey Show.
I try NOT to think of MimiYet acceptable.
This is just GREAT for kids What a role model!!!
On 5/29/23 1:42 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
You've reminded me of an elementary school teacher from back in the day >> who wore garish makeup and wigs, a woman in "drag."
Oh dear!! So, you were exposed to drag queens in elementary school.No, it's you who exhibit an unhealthy obsession.
No wonder you are so fucked up.
Not wanting to sexually mutilate children and not wanting to sterilize them is a very healthy obsession.Oh dear!! So, you were exposed to drag queens in elementary school.No, it's you who exhibit an unhealthy obsession.
Your obsession with sexualizing minors and grooming them to be gender confused
is what's unhealthy.
Spin, whirl, dervish away...
Not wanting to sexually mutilate children and not wanting to sterilize themOh dear!! So, you were exposed to drag queens in elementary school.No, it's you who exhibit an unhealthy obsession.
is a very healthy obsession.
That's quite a leap. Are you tripping?
Your obsession with sexualizing minors and grooming them to be gender confused
is what's unhealthy.
You and your doctor need to revisit your prescriptions.
Spin, whirl, dervish away...
Not wanting to sexually mutilate children and not wanting to sterilize themOh dear!! So, you were exposed to drag queens in elementary school.No, it's you who exhibit an unhealthy obsession.
is a very healthy obsession.
That's quite a leap. Are you tripping?
Your obsession with sexualizing minors and grooming them to be gender confused
is what's unhealthy.
You and your doctor need to revisit your prescriptions.I am not on gender changing hormone blockers, nor do I plan to have my genitals removed.
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 4:48:15 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/29/23 1:32 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 8:24:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Hence the movie rating upon rerelease.
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess >>>> parties," sports mascots, etc.
For adult viewing, dog shit eating Devine was funny, but not appropriate for kids.
Live performances should have ratings also
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 4:43:25 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/29/23 1:26 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Yet acceptable.
You've reminded me of an elementary school teacher from back in the day >>>> who wore garish makeup and wigs, a woman in "drag." Think Mimi in The
Drew Carey Show.
I try NOT to think of Mimi
This is just GREAT for kids What a role model!!!
At any rate Mimi was not a crossdresser nor a drag queen, just a very ugly biological woman.
On 5/29/23 7:00 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Rubber, glue.
On 5/29/23 6:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 4:48:15 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/29/23 1:32 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 8:24:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Hence the movie rating upon rerelease.
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess >>>> parties," sports mascots, etc.
For adult viewing, dog shit eating Devine was funny, but not appropriate for kids.
Live performances should have ratings alsoBars and strip clubs are already age-restricted.
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:42:28 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/29/23 6:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 4:48:15 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Bars and strip clubs are already age-restricted.
On 5/29/23 1:32 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 8:24:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Hence the movie rating upon rerelease.
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess >>>>>> parties," sports mascots, etc.
For adult viewing, dog shit eating Devine was funny, but not appropriate for kids.
Live performances should have ratings also
Thanks for validatng my point.
Any venue showing such stuff that is not not a bar or strip club should be age restricted.
Like libraries and public schools.
Or parks, or concert venues, and whatever else.
On 5/30/23 7:03 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:42:28 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/29/23 6:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 4:48:15 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Bars and strip clubs are already age-restricted.
On 5/29/23 1:32 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 8:24:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Hence the movie rating upon rerelease.
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess
parties," sports mascots, etc.
For adult viewing, dog shit eating Devine was funny, but not appropriate for kids.
Live performances should have ratings also
Thanks for validatng my point.When schools serve alcohol and allow naked dancing, get back to me.
Any venue showing such stuff that is not not a bar or strip club should be age restricted.You lose the argument with "such stuff" because you include being LGBTQ
Like libraries and public schools.
in it.
Or parks, or concert venues, and whatever else.You'll be all for this:
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/28/texas-legislature-drag-show-bill/
"Under Senate Bill 12, business owners would face a $10,000 fine for
hosting sexually explicit performances in which someone is nude or
appeals to the “prurient interest in sex.” Performers caught violating the proposed restriction could be slapped with a Class A misdemeanor,
which carries a maximum penalty of a year in jail and a $4,000 fine...
The bill classifies as sexual conduct the use of “accessories or prosthetics that exaggerate male or female sexual characteristics,” accompanied with sexual gesticulations."
Good-bye, Hooters! Good-bye, Twin Peaks! Watch out, Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders!
"Brigitte Bandit, an Austin-based drag performer, criticized the
addition of “accessories or prosthetics” to the bill. Drag artists performing in front of children don’t wear sexually explicit costumes, Bandit said, adding that this bill creates a lot of confusion over what
is and isn’t acceptable to do at drag shows.
“Is me wearing a padded bra going to be [considered] enhancing sexual features?” Bandit asked. “It’s still really vague but it’s still geared
to try to target drag performance, which is what this bill has been
trying to do this entire time, right?”"
This still won't cover Drag Story Hour due to the lack of prurient interest.
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 8:42:15 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/30/23 7:03 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:42:28 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/29/23 6:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 4:48:15 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Bars and strip clubs are already age-restricted.
On 5/29/23 1:32 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 8:24:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Hence the movie rating upon rerelease.
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess
parties," sports mascots, etc.
For adult viewing, dog shit eating Devine was funny, but not appropriate for kids.
Live performances should have ratings also
LOL!!!!!!Thanks for validatng my point.When schools serve alcohol and allow naked dancing, get back to me.
You brought up bars and strip clubs to support your point, now
you say they are irrelevant!!!!!!
We are talking about drag showsAny venue showing such stuff that is not not a bar or strip club should be age restricted.You lose the argument with "such stuff" because you include being LGBTQ
Like libraries and public schools.
in it.
stay on point!
Or parks, or concert venues, and whatever else.You'll be all for this:
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/28/texas-legislature-drag-show-bill/
"Under Senate Bill 12, business owners would face a $10,000 fine for hosting sexually explicit performances in which someone is nude or
appeals to the “prurient interest in sex.” Performers caught violating the proposed restriction could be slapped with a Class A misdemeanor, which carries a maximum penalty of a year in jail and a $4,000 fine...
The bill classifies as sexual conduct the use of “accessories or prosthetics that exaggerate male or female sexual characteristics,” accompanied with sexual gesticulations."
Good-bye, Hooters! Good-bye, Twin Peaks! Watch out, Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders!Hooters? My hot wings didn't "come" with dildo fries.
"Brigitte Bandit, an Austin-based drag performer, criticized the
addition of “accessories or prosthetics” to the bill. Drag artists performing in front of children don’t wear sexually explicit costumes, Bandit said, adding that this bill creates a lot of confusion over what
is and isn’t acceptable to do at drag shows.
“Is me wearing a padded bra going to be [considered] enhancing sexual features?” Bandit asked. “It’s still really vague but it’s still geared
to try to target drag performance, which is what this bill has been
trying to do this entire time, right?”"
This still won't cover Drag Story Hour due to the lack of prurient interest.I only care about this stuff when its in front of kiddies.
STAY ON POINT!!!!!!
This still won't cover Drag Story Hour due to the lack of prurient interest.I only care about this stuff when its in front of kiddies.
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 8:42:15 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 5/30/23 7:03 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Tuesday, May 30, 2023 at 10:42:28 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:When schools serve alcohol and allow naked dancing, get back to me.
On 5/29/23 6:58 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 4:48:15 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Bars and strip clubs are already age-restricted.
On 5/29/23 1:32 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, May 29, 2023 at 8:24:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Hence the movie rating upon rerelease.
Costumed performers for children is not a new thing: clowns, "princess >>>>>>>> parties," sports mascots, etc.
For adult viewing, dog shit eating Devine was funny, but not appropriate for kids.
Live performances should have ratings also
Thanks for validatng my point.
LOL!!!!!!
You brought up bars and strip clubs to support your point, now
you say they are irrelevant!!!!!!
Any venue showing such stuff that is not not a bar or strip club should be age restricted.You lose the argument with "such stuff" because you include being LGBTQ
Like libraries and public schools.
in it.
We are talking about drag shows
stay on point!
Or parks, or concert venues, and whatever else.You'll be all for this:
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/28/texas-legislature-drag-show-bill/
"Under Senate Bill 12, business owners would face a $10,000 fine for
hosting sexually explicit performances in which someone is nude or
appeals to the “prurient interest in sex.” Performers caught violating >> the proposed restriction could be slapped with a Class A misdemeanor,
which carries a maximum penalty of a year in jail and a $4,000 fine...
The bill classifies as sexual conduct the use of “accessories or
prosthetics that exaggerate male or female sexual characteristics,”
accompanied with sexual gesticulations."
Good-bye, Hooters! Good-bye, Twin Peaks! Watch out, Dallas Cowboy
Cheerleaders!
Hooters? My hot wings didn't "come" with dildo fries.
"Brigitte Bandit, an Austin-based drag performer, criticized the
addition of “accessories or prosthetics” to the bill. Drag artists
performing in front of children don’t wear sexually explicit costumes,
Bandit said, adding that this bill creates a lot of confusion over what
is and isn’t acceptable to do at drag shows.
“Is me wearing a padded bra going to be [considered] enhancing sexual
features?” Bandit asked. “It’s still really vague but it’s still geared
to try to target drag performance, which is what this bill has been
trying to do this entire time, right?”"
This still won't cover Drag Story Hour due to the lack of prurient interest.
I only care about this stuff when its in front of kiddies.
STAY ON POINT!!!!!!
Then you've lost: Drag Story Hour doesn't have prurient interest.
Then you've lost: Drag Story Hour doesn't have prurient interest.I direct you back to the main point:
It sexualizes children
Then you've lost: Drag Story Hour doesn't have prurient interest.
I direct you back to the main point:
It sexualizes children
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 01:35:35 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,748 |
