https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list.
And you even take "Pride" in it.
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list.
And you even take "Pride" in it.
On 6/1/23 1:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list.[Rufo] proposed that instead of saying “drag queens in schools,” conservatives should use “trans stripper” to shift “the debate to sexualization.” That way, the left “will find themselves defending concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
And you even take "Pride" in it.
Drag queens are not approptiate for children.
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 4:37:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/1/23 1:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:[Rufo] proposed that instead of saying “drag queens in schools,”
https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list.
And you even take "Pride" in it.
conservatives should use “trans stripper” to shift “the debate to
sexualization.” That way, the left “will find themselves defending
concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
You are conflating two different things,
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Let them perform in night clubs,
Drag queens are not approptiate for children.
On 6/2/23 12:40 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 4:37:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/1/23 1:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:[Rufo] proposed that instead of saying “drag queens in schools,”
https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list.
And you even take "Pride" in it.
conservatives should use “trans stripper” to shift “the debate to >> sexualization.” That way, the left “will find themselves defending
concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
You are conflating two different things,No, that's you conflating public schools and library story time.
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Let them perform in night clubs,
Drag queens are not approptiate for children.Adult drag shows are not appropriate for children. Story time is not an adult drag show.
"Drag queen" is a subset of costumed performer, many of which are appropriate for children, or will your next moral panic be about
pantomime horses?
On 6/2/23 12:40 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 4:37:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/1/23 1:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:[Rufo] proposed that instead of saying “drag queens in schools,”
https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list.
And you even take "Pride" in it.
conservatives should use “trans stripper” to shift “the debate to >> sexualization.” That way, the left “will find themselves defending
concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
You are conflating two different things,No, that's you conflating public schools and library story time.
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Let them perform in night clubs,
Drag queens are not appropriate for children.Adult drag shows are not appropriate for children. Story time is not an adult drag show.
"Drag queen" is a subset of costumed performer, many of which are appropriate for children, or will your next moral panic be about
pantomime horses?
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 8:09:59 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 12:40 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 4:37:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:No, that's you conflating public schools and library story time.
On 6/1/23 1:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:[Rufo] proposed that instead of saying “drag queens in schools,”
https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list. >>>>> And you even take "Pride" in it.
conservatives should use “trans stripper” to shift “the debate to >>>> sexualization.” That way, the left “will find themselves defending >>>> concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
You are conflating two different things,
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Let them perform in night clubs,Adult drag shows are not appropriate for children. Story time is not an
Drag queens are not appropriate for children.
adult drag show.
Still, not appropriate for children.
QdRAG QUEENS ARE LIVING OUT THEIR FETISHES
Kink shaming? No."Drag queen" is a subset of costumed performer, many of which are
appropriate for children, or will your next moral panic be about
pantomime horses?
Is that your latest kinky fetish?
Fetishes are not appropriate for childern
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 8:09:59 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 12:40 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 4:37:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:No, that's you conflating public schools and library story time.
On 6/1/23 1:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?[Rufo] proposed that instead of saying “drag queens in schools,” >>>> conservatives should use “trans stripper” to shift “the debate to >>>> sexualization.” That way, the left “will find themselves defending >>>> concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list. >>>>> And you even take "Pride" in it.
You are conflating two different things,
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Let them perform in night clubs,Adult drag shows are not appropriate for children. Story time is not an >> adult drag show.
Drag queens are not appropriate for children.
Still, not appropriate for children.Reading children's stories to children is appropriate even if the reader
is wearing a costume while doing it.
QdRAG QUEENS ARE LIVING OUT THEIR FETISHESNo, they're performing artists. You're mixing them up with the old
attitudes towards "transvestites" who were assumed to be fetishists.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transvestic_fetishism
"Transvestic fetishism is a psychiatric diagnosis applied to men who are thought to have an excessive sexual or erotic interest in
cross-dressing; this interest is often expressed in autoerotic behavior.
*It differs from cross-dressing for entertainment or other purposes that
do not involve sexual arousal.* Under the name transvestic disorder, it
is categorized as a paraphilia in the DSM-5."
"Drag queen" is a subset of costumed performer, many of which are
appropriate for children, or will your next moral panic be about
pantomime horses?
Is that your latest kinky fetish?Kink shaming? No.
Fetishes are not appropriate for childernFollowing the Rufo rules, I see, trying to make it look like I'm
"defending concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
Huh?Fetishes are not appropriate for childernFollowing the Rufo rules, I see, trying to make it look like I'm "defending concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
Fetishes are not appropriate for childernFollowing the Rufo rules, I see, trying to make it look like I'm
"defending concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
Huh?
On 6/2/23 6:34 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
More Art:I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
All-purpose smear word.
Fetishes are not appropriate for childernFollowing the Rufo rules, I see, trying to make it look like I'm
"defending concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
Huh?
For example, you just said "grooming shaming" because everyone's against grooming, right? But what you're calling 'grooming' is simply existing
in public, representation.
This is a real slippery slope. A Montana anti-drag law was used as an
excuse to cancel a public speech by a trans person. Drag is not trans. A lecture is not a drag show.
A golden oldie:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Authoritarian_Personality
"A central idea of The Authoritarian Personality is that
authoritarianism is the result of a Freudian developmental model. Excessively harsh and punitive parenting was posited to cause children
to feel immense anger towards their parents; yet fear of parental disapproval or punishment caused people to not directly confront their parents, but rather to identify with and idolize authority figures."
Better to bully than to be bullied.
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:03:34 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 6:34 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:More Art:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
All-purpose smear word.
FALSE grooming is exactly why the trans community is invading schools. forcing their gender ideology (and who knows what else!) down the little kiddies throats,
Fetishes are not appropriate for childernFollowing the Rufo rules, I see, trying to make it look like I'm
"defending concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
Huh?
For example, you just said "grooming shaming" because everyone's against
grooming, right? But what you're calling 'grooming' is simply existing
in public, representation.
no no no
Its ideological force feeding
it has no place in schools
even representation has no place in schnooks.
This is a real slippery slope. A Montana anti-drag law was used as an
excuse to cancel a public speech by a trans person. Drag is not trans. A
lecture is not a drag show.
We don't need either one in schoold
A golden oldie:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Authoritarian_Personality
"A central idea of The Authoritarian Personality is that
authoritarianism is the result of a Freudian developmental model.
Excessively harsh and punitive parenting was posited to cause children
to feel immense anger towards their parents; yet fear of parental
disapproval or punishment caused people to not directly confront their
parents, but rather to identify with and idolize authority figures."
Better to bully than to be bullied.
Its the trans that are doing the bullying.
Case in point:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dallas-requires-officials-to-use-preferred-pronouns-docs-reveal/ar-AA1c0mdT
On 6/3/23 11:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:03:34 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 6:34 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:More Art:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
All-purpose smear word.
FALSE grooming is exactly why the trans community is invading schools. forcing their gender ideology (and who knows what else!) down the little kiddies throats,Gender identity is inherent.
On 6/3/23 11:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:03:34 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 6:34 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:More Art:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
All-purpose smear word.
FALSE grooming is exactly why the trans community is invading schools. forcing their gender ideology (and who knows what else!) down the little kiddies throats,Gender identity is inherent. You can't say you're for "live and let
live" if you claim appearing in public is recruitment.
Fetishes are not appropriate for childernFollowing the Rufo rules, I see, trying to make it look like I'm
"defending concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
Huh?
For example, you just said "grooming shaming" because everyone's against >> grooming, right? But what you're calling 'grooming' is simply existing
in public, representation.
no no no
Its ideological force feeding
By existing.
it has no place in schoolsThere, you've said it.
even representation has no place in schnooks.
This is a real slippery slope. A Montana anti-drag law was used as an
excuse to cancel a public speech by a trans person. Drag is not trans. A >> lecture is not a drag show.
We don't need either one in schooldSo no trans allowed in schools? You'd fire trans teachers? Would you
expel trans kids? or just send them to special schools? Maybe a camp?
A golden oldie:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Authoritarian_Personality
"A central idea of The Authoritarian Personality is that
authoritarianism is the result of a Freudian developmental model.
Excessively harsh and punitive parenting was posited to cause children
to feel immense anger towards their parents; yet fear of parental
disapproval or punishment caused people to not directly confront their
parents, but rather to identify with and idolize authority figures."
Better to bully than to be bullied.
Its the trans that are doing the bullying.More Adorno:
"Moreover, the book suggested that authoritarianism was rooted in
suppressed homosexuality, which was redirected into outward hostility towards the father, which was, in turn, suppressed for fear of being infantilized and castrated by the father."
Case in point:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dallas-requires-officials-to-use-preferred-pronouns-docs-reveal/ar-AA1c0mdTRequired pronouns? Is that all you've got? Common courtesy?
https://www.hrc.org/resources/fatal-violence-against-the-transgender-and-gender-non-conforming-community-in-2021
On 6/3/23 11:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:03:34 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 6:34 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:More Art:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
All-purpose smear word.
FALSE grooming is exactly why the trans community is invading schools. forcing their gender ideology (and who knows what else!) down the little kiddies throats,
Gender identity is inherent. You can't say you're for "live and let
live" if you claim appearing in public is recruitment.
Case in point:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dallas-requires-officials-to-use-preferred-pronouns-docs-reveal/ar-AA1c0mdT
Required pronouns? Is that all you've got? Common courtesy?
"Required" is NOT common courtesy, it is compelled speech, and not
free speech
https://www.hrc.org/resources/fatal-violence-against-the-transgender-and-gender-non-conforming-community-in-2021
Compelling speech is fatal violence. whatever that is!
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 12:24:37 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/3/23 11:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:03:34 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 6:34 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:More Art:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
All-purpose smear word.
FALSE grooming is exactly why the trans community is invading schools.
forcing their gender ideology (and who knows what else!) down the little kiddies throats,
Gender identity is inherent. You can't say you're for "live and let
live" if you claim appearing in public is recruitment.
Putting on shows in front of kids goes way beyond appearing in public.
You are welcome to shop in the supermarket.
Stay out of schools and kiddie programs.
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 12:24:37 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/3/23 11:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:03:34 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Gender identity is inherent. You can't say you're for "live and let
On 6/2/23 6:34 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:More Art:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
All-purpose smear word.
FALSE grooming is exactly why the trans community is invading schools.
forcing their gender ideology (and who knows what else!) down the little kiddies throats,
live" if you claim appearing in public is recruitment.
Fetishes are not appropriate for childernFollowing the Rufo rules, I see, trying to make it look like I'm
"defending concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
Huh?
For example, you just said "grooming shaming" because everyone's against >>>> grooming, right? But what you're calling 'grooming' is simply existing >>>> in public, representation.
no no no
Its ideological force feeding
By existing.
you are very welcome to exist.
Just stay away from the kiddies.
it has no place in schoolsThere, you've said it.
even representation has no place in schnooks.
So no trans allowed in schools? You'd fire trans teachers? Would youThis is a real slippery slope. A Montana anti-drag law was used as an
excuse to cancel a public speech by a trans person. Drag is not trans. A >>>> lecture is not a drag show.
We don't need either one in schoold
expel trans kids? or just send them to special schools? Maybe a camp?
no not what I said.
No adult groomers and fetishists, that's what I said.
A golden oldie:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Authoritarian_Personality
"A central idea of The Authoritarian Personality is that
authoritarianism is the result of a Freudian developmental model.
Excessively harsh and punitive parenting was posited to cause children >>>> to feel immense anger towards their parents; yet fear of parental
disapproval or punishment caused people to not directly confront their >>>> parents, but rather to identify with and idolize authority figures."
Better to bully than to be bullied.
that is why I am counterpunching back at you six times more strong than you punch me.
Its the trans that are doing the bullying.More Adorno:
"Moreover, the book suggested that authoritarianism was rooted in
suppressed homosexuality, which was redirected into outward hostility
towards the father, which was, in turn, suppressed for fear of being
infantilized and castrated by the father."
gobbledygook
Case in point:Required pronouns? Is that all you've got? Common courtesy?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/dallas-requires-officials-to-use-preferred-pronouns-docs-reveal/ar-AA1c0mdT
"Required" is NOT common courtesy, it is compelled speech, and not free speech
https://www.hrc.org/resources/fatal-violence-against-the-transgender-and-gender-non-conforming-community-in-2021
Compelling speech is fatal violence. whatever that is!
On 6/3/23 7:59 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 12:24:37 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/3/23 11:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Saturday, June 3, 2023 at 11:03:34 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 6:34 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 11:11:54 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:More Art:
On 6/2/23 9:09 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Grooming shaming
All-purpose smear word.
FALSE grooming is exactly why the trans community is invading schools. >>> forcing their gender ideology (and who knows what else!) down the little kiddies throats,
Gender identity is inherent. You can't say you're for "live and let
live" if you claim appearing in public is recruitment.
Putting on shows in front of kids goes way beyond appearing in public.Reading books wearing a costume. Still not "recruitment" and I didn't
miss your attempt to equate being at a school with child abuse.
You are welcome to shop in the supermarket.It's all for show. Schools already have dress codes for teachers.
Stay out of schools and kiddie programs.
On Sunday, June 4, 2023 at 3:23:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Gender identity is inherent. You can't say you're for "live and let
live" if you claim appearing in public is recruitment.
Putting on shows in front of kids goes way beyond appearing in public.Reading books wearing a costume. Still not "recruitment" and I didn't
miss your attempt to equate being at a school with child abuse.
because you are throwing your agenda on them, which they
don'y need to see. Its inappropriate for that age group.
You are welcome to shop in the supermarket.It's all for show. Schools already have dress codes for teachers.
Stay out of schools and kiddie programs.
well, there is that monster prosthetic boob crossdresser/trans/whatever up in Canada.
We don't need your kind of show.
Keep LGBT+ advocates out of schools. They don't need to be there.
Stay away from the kiddies. The only reason they do this is to groom.
Live your lives on your own as adults, i have no interest in oppressing you, until you start messing with children.
You guys and dolls can lead your happy lives without parading yourselves
in front of children.
On 6/4/23 4:52 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, June 4, 2023 at 3:23:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Gender identity is inherent. You can't say you're for "live and let >>>> live" if you claim appearing in public is recruitment.
Putting on shows in front of kids goes way beyond appearing in public. >> Reading books wearing a costume. Still not "recruitment" and I didn'tmiss your attempt to equate being at a school with child abuse.
because you are throwing your agenda on them, which theyIt's not inappropriate for children to see adults in costume reading
don'y need to see. Its inappropriate for that age group.
books. And "agenda" = "existing in public"
You are welcome to shop in the supermarket.It's all for show. Schools already have dress codes for teachers.
Stay out of schools and kiddie programs.
well, there is that monster prosthetic boob crossdresser/trans/whatever up in Canada.Yes, you all love to nut-pick. You're not trying to ban females with
boob jobs from schools.
We don't need your kind of show.A portion of those children are LGBTQ.
Keep LGBT+ advocates out of schools. They don't need to be there.
Stay away from the kiddies. The only reason they do this is to groom.
Live your lives on your own as adults, i have no interest in oppressing you,By existing in public.
until you start messing with children.
You guys and dolls can lead your happy lives without parading yourselves in front of children.Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
On Friday, June 2, 2023 at 8:09:59 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/2/23 12:40 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 4:37:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:No, that's you conflating public schools and library story time.
On 6/1/23 1:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 1, 2023 at 11:08:24 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:[Rufo] proposed that instead of saying “drag queens in schools,”
https://i.redd.it/slow-day-get-your-rage-on-with-the-maga-wheel-of-outrage-v0-52za2987bn2b1.jpg?
You looney tune lefties give me a lot of choices.
But sterilizing and dismembering children is at the top of the list. >>>>> And you even take "Pride" in it.
conservatives should use “trans stripper” to shift “the debate to >>>> sexualization.” That way, the left “will find themselves defending >>>> concepts and words that are deeply disturbing to most people.”
You are conflating two different things,
I don't want attired drag queens in public schools.
Let them perform in night clubs,Adult drag shows are not appropriate for children. Story time is not an
Drag queens are not approptiate for children.
adult drag show.
"Drag queen" is a subset of costumed performer, many of which are
appropriate for children, or will your next moral panic be about
pantomime horses?
Drag queens are living out their fetishes.
Exhibitions of fetishes are not appropriate for children.
"Drag queen" is a subset of costumed performer, many of which are
appropriate for children, or will your next moral panic be about
pantomime horses?
Drag queens are living out their fetishes.No, drag is an art form. You're mixing it up with old-school
Exhibitions of fetishes are not appropriate for children.
transvestites. I suppose you're going to continue repeating this canard.
No, drag is an art form. You're mixing it up with old-school
transvestites. I suppose you're going to continue repeating this canard.
On 6/4/23 4:52 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Sunday, June 4, 2023 at 3:23:41 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Gender identity is inherent. You can't say you're for "live and let >>>> live" if you claim appearing in public is recruitment.
Putting on shows in front of kids goes way beyond appearing in public. >> Reading books wearing a costume. Still not "recruitment" and I didn'tmiss your attempt to equate being at a school with child abuse.
because you are throwing your agenda on them, which theyIt's not inappropriate for children to see adults in costume reading
don'y need to see. Its inappropriate for that age group.
books. And "agenda" = "existing in public"
You are welcome to shop in the supermarket.It's all for show. Schools already have dress codes for teachers.
Stay out of schools and kiddie programs.
well, there is that monster prosthetic boob crossdresser/trans/whatever up in Canada.Yes, you all love to nut-pick. You're not trying to ban females with
boob jobs from schools.
We don't need your kind of show.A portion of those children are LGBTQ.
Keep LGBT+ advocates out of schools. They don't need to be there.
Stay away from the kiddies. The only reason they do this is to groom.
Live your lives on your own as adults, i have no interest in oppressing you,By existing in public.
until you start messing with children.
You guys and dolls can lead your happy lives without parading yourselves in front of children.Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
you can exist just fine without pushing your agenda onto other people's children.
v
No, drag is an art form. You're mixing it up with old-school
transvestites. I suppose you're going to continue repeating this canard.
Strip tease is an art form.
Both drag and strip tease are not suitable for children.
Keep your fetish away from other people's children.
On 6/6/23 3:51 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
v
No, drag is an art form. You're mixing it up with old-school
transvestites. I suppose you're going to continue repeating this canard.
Strip tease is an art form.There's no "Strip Tease Story Hour."
Both drag and strip tease are not suitable for children.Book reading is.
Keep your fetish away from other people's children.No fetishes involved no matter how many times you misapply the word.
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 9:58:08 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/6/23 3:51 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
vThere's no "Strip Tease Story Hour."
No, drag is an art form. You're mixing it up with old-schoolStrip tease is an art form.
transvestites. I suppose you're going to continue repeating this canard. >>>
Both drag and strip tease are not suitable for children.Book reading is.
not by dragsters.
Nor by naked people having sex.
Thseobjection is not to the books,
Keep your fetish away from other people's children.No fetishes involved no matter how many times you misapply the word.
Maybe you're right, lets teach the kiddies how a drag queen prepares for his "performance art".
this is an instructional video on how to tuck, how
to dress up, and how to carry yourself as a drag queen
some frontal nudity, no sex acts,
https://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=816611165
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"You're out of replies.
On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 2:35:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:You're out of replies.
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"
say that again!
If you are unhappy, I am glad.
If I made you unhappy, I am doubly glad.
Happy or not, you exist
On 6/7/23 4:07 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 2:35:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:You're out of replies.
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"
say that again!Sure, echolalia and babbling remain options for you.
If you are unhappy, I am glad.
If I made you unhappy, I am doubly glad.
Happy or not, you existYou overestimate your effect on your reader. "Pity" or "sorrow" are
better descriptions of what you inspire.
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"You're out of replies.
On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 2:35:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:You're out of replies.
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"
You can't surgically turn a cabbage into a watermelon
Hormones don't do it either.
However, such attempts may leave the cabbage infertile.
No such thing as fruit (or fruitcake) affirming surgery
On 6/9/23 5:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 2:35:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:You're out of replies.
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"
You can't surgically turn a cabbage into a watermelonhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruciferous_vegetables
Hormones don't do it either.
However, such attempts may leave the cabbage infertile.
No such thing as fruit (or fruitcake) affirming surgery
On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 7:33:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/9/23 5:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 2:35:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruciferous_vegetables
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:You're out of replies.
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"
You can't surgically turn a cabbage into a watermelon
Hormones don't do it either.
However, such attempts may leave the cabbage infertile.
No such thing as fruit (or fruitcake) affirming surgery
you got me! I'm busted!
It said right in there that cabbages can be turned into watermelons!
NOT!!!!!!!!!!
On 6/9/23 7:03 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 7:33:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/9/23 5:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 2:35:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruciferous_vegetables
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:You're out of replies.
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"
You can't surgically turn a cabbage into a watermelon
Hormones don't do it either.
However, such attempts may leave the cabbage infertile.
No such thing as fruit (or fruitcake) affirming surgery
you got me! I'm busted!
It said right in there that cabbages can be turned into watermelons!
NOT!!!!!!!!!!You missed the point. Cruciferous vegetables are the same species
expressed differently.
https://www.encyclopedia.com/food/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/cabbage-and-crucifer-plants
"[B]roccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, kale, and kohlrabi belong to the same species (Brassica oleracea L.) in the Brassicaceae or mustard family."
Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or cauliflower.
On Saturday, June 10, 2023 at 9:48:19 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/9/23 7:03 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 9, 2023 at 7:33:26 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:You missed the point. Cruciferous vegetables are the same species
On 6/9/23 5:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, June 7, 2023 at 2:35:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cruciferous_vegetables
On 6/7/23 12:33 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 10:16:56 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:You're out of replies.
Can't be happy if you're not allowed to exist.
More like the whiny "can't exist if not allowed to be happy"
You can't surgically turn a cabbage into a watermelon
Hormones don't do it either.
However, such attempts may leave the cabbage infertile.
No such thing as fruit (or fruitcake) affirming surgery
you got me! I'm busted!
It said right in there that cabbages can be turned into watermelons!
NOT!!!!!!!!!!
expressed differently.
https://www.encyclopedia.com/food/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/cabbage-and-crucifer-plants
"[B]roccoli, brussels sprouts, cabbage, cauliflower, collards, kale, and
kohlrabi belong to the same species (Brassica oleracea L.) in the
Brassicaceae or mustard family."
Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or cauliflower.
I doubt that.
If the genes were identical you would have the same thing, given identical stages in life.
What does all that have to do with watermelon?
You missed the point. Cruciferous vegetables are the same species
expressed differently.
Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or cauliflower.
Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or cauliflower.
You missed the point. Cruciferous vegetables are the same species
expressed differently.
I didn't know that cabbages and Kale were capable of self expression.
Is a cabbage a him, or a her, or a they?
Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or cauliflower.
Looking at the human genes tells you if you've got a man or woman.
Well-done! Except this refers to gene expression, which involvesLooking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or
cauliflower.
FALSE!
Through their work, Arias and Niederhuth found 3,958 expressed genes
that separated kale from cabbage and TO1000. Some of these
differences were in genes that regulate vegetative and reproductive transitions — things that create the very different look of cabbage
versus kale.
https://bondlsc.missouri.edu/2021/04/28/lab-explores-link-between-genetic-differences-and-domestication-in-kale/
On 6/11/23 8:36 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or
cauliflower.
FALSE!
Through their work, Arias and Niederhuth found 3,958 expressed genes
that separated kale from cabbage and TO1000. Some of these
differences were in genes that regulate vegetative and reproductive transitions — things that create the very different look of cabbage versus kale.
https://bondlsc.missouri.edu/2021/04/28/lab-explores-link-between-genetic-differences-and-domestication-in-kale/Well-done! Except this refers to gene expression, which involves
switching on or off genes in common. You've made my point in that these
are the same genetic species with very different expressions.
I accept these are kale vs cabbage, not cauliflower.
On 6/11/23 8:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
You missed the point. Cruciferous vegetables are the same species
expressed differently.
I didn't know that cabbages and Kale were capable of self expression.Go ahead, ask one.
Is a cabbage a him, or a her, or a they?
Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or cauliflower.
Looking at the human genes tells you if you've got a man or woman.No, that's not always true.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/16324-intersex
On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 10:44:59 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/11/23 8:36 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Well-done! Except this refers to gene expression, which involvesLooking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or
cauliflower.
FALSE!
Through their work, Arias and Niederhuth found 3,958 expressed genes
that separated kale from cabbage and TO1000. Some of these
differences were in genes that regulate vegetative and reproductive
transitions — things that create the very different look of cabbage
versus kale.
https://bondlsc.missouri.edu/2021/04/28/lab-explores-link-between-genetic-differences-and-domestication-in-kale/
switching on or off genes in common. You've made my point in that these
are the same genetic species with very different expressions.
I accept these are kale vs cabbage, not cauliflower.
Your head is definitely cabbage,
You are a cabbagehead.
On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 10:38:07 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/11/23 8:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
You missed the point. Cruciferous vegetables are the same species
expressed differently.
I didn't know that cabbages and Kale were capable of self expression.Go ahead, ask one.
Is a cabbage a him, or a her, or a they?
No, that's not always true.Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or cauliflower.
Looking at the human genes tells you if you've got a man or woman.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/16324-intersex
That is a mutation.
On 6/13/23 5:07 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 10:44:59 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/11/23 8:36 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Well-done! Except this refers to gene expression, which involvesLooking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or
cauliflower.
FALSE!
Through their work, Arias and Niederhuth found 3,958 expressed genes
that separated kale from cabbage and TO1000. Some of these
differences were in genes that regulate vegetative and reproductive
transitions — things that create the very different look of cabbage >>> versus kale.
https://bondlsc.missouri.edu/2021/04/28/lab-explores-link-between-genetic-differences-and-domestication-in-kale/
switching on or off genes in common. You've made my point in that these >> are the same genetic species with very different expressions.
I accept these are kale vs cabbage, not cauliflower.
Your head is definitely cabbage,SCTV fan? Or Kids in the Hall?
You are a cabbagehead.
On 6/13/23 5:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 10:38:07 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/11/23 8:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
You missed the point. Cruciferous vegetables are the same species
expressed differently.
I didn't know that cabbages and Kale were capable of self expression. >>> Is a cabbage a him, or a her, or a they?Go ahead, ask one.
No, that's not always true.Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or cauliflower. >>>Looking at the human genes tells you if you've got a man or woman.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/16324-intersex
That is a mutation.Still a human. Go read your old X-Men comics to see how your attitude
can go, plus bonus Morlock content.
On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 6:16:17 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/13/23 5:06 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Monday, June 12, 2023 at 10:38:07 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Still a human. Go read your old X-Men comics to see how your
On 6/11/23 8:29 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
You missed the point. Cruciferous vegetables are the same
species expressed differently.
I didn't know that cabbages and Kale were capable of selfGo ahead, ask one.
expression. Is a cabbage a him, or a her, or a they?
No, that's not always true.Looking at the genes can't tell you if you've got kale or
cauliflower.
Looking at the human genes tells you if you've got a man or
woman.
https://my.clevelandclinic.org/health/articles/16324-intersex
That is a mutation.
attitude can go, plus bonus Morlock content.
Some humans have been born with six fingers, four fingers, no
fingers, three feet, attached to a twin human, some with two heads,
and even one with no brain who is named Steve.
That does not confer upon them a category. WE CAN SAFELY SAY THAT
HUMANS HAVE TWO LEGS, TWO ARMS, FIVE FINGERS ON EACH HAND, AND ARE OF
ONE OF TWO SEXES, EITHER MALE OR FEMALE.
On Tuesday, June 13, 2023 at 6:18:17 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/13/23 5:07 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
You are a cabbagehead.SCTV fan? Or Kids in the Hall?
but not this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabbage_Alley
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 495 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 41:21:23 |
| Calls: | 9,743 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 13,742 |
| Messages: | 6,183,792 |
