The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more than three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag.COVID-19. The Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June, potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack, claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are “patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government officials involved in investigating the origins of
ScottW
The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more than three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from
journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag.
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack, claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are
“patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government
officials involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19. The
Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June,
potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to
Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s Substack project.
On 6/14/23 5:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more than three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from
journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag.
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack, claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu areCome back when you have a credible source.
“patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government officials involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19. The Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June,
potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s Substack project.
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 10:27:12 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/14/23 5:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more thanCome back when you have a credible source.
three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from
journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag.
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack, >>> claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are
“patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government
officials involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19. The
Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly
classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June,
potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to
Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s Substack project.
he has them right here. Two out of three, the one relatively unknown.
On 6/15/23 1:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 10:27:12 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/14/23 5:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more thanCome back when you have a credible source.
three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from
journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag.
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack,
claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are
“patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government
officials involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19. The
Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly
classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June,
potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to >>> Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s Substack project.
he has them right here. Two out of three, the one relatively unknown.
You're mistaking the "journalists" for the sources
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 2:29:18 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/15/23 1:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 10:27:12 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/14/23 5:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more thanCome back when you have a credible source.
three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from
journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag.
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack, >>>>> claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are
“patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government
officials involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19. The
Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly >>>>> classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June,
potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to >>>>> Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s Substack project.
he has them right here. Two out of three, the one relatively unknown.
You're mistaking the "journalists" for the sources
Actually, it was you that did that in your post, and i was about to call you out for that.
On 6/16/23 12:09 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 2:29:18 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/15/23 1:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 10:27:12 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/14/23 5:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more thanCome back when you have a credible source.
three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from
journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag. >>>>>
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack,
claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are
“patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government >>>>> officials involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19. The
Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly >>>>> classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June,
potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to >>>>> Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s Substack project.
he has them right here. Two out of three, the one relatively unknown.
You're mistaking the "journalists" for the sources
Actually, it was you that did that in your post, and i was about to call you out for that.No. Your mistake: "*The report*, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack, *claims* Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are “patients zero” for COVID-19, *citing anonymous U.S. government officials* involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19."
"The report claims,... citing... anonymous U.S. government officials."
Not the journalists, nor Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu.
That said, anonymous U.S. government officials have more cred than
Taibbi and Shellenberger.
Fun fact: the usage "Patient Zero" is based on a misreading of the
letter 'O.' Randy Shilts wasn't perfect.
https://macleans.ca/culture/movies/how-a-typo-created-a-scapegoat-for-the-aids-epidemic/
When Darrow published his report, Patient 57 was renamed Patient O, with
the letter “O” standing for “Out-of-California.” Somewhere along the paper trail, the “O” got confused with a zero. Adding to the confusion was the fact that Dugas was the study’s “original” patient, placed at the centre of the cluster diagram, between patients from L.A. and New
York. Darrow stressed that there was no evidence that Dugas had infected
the others—never mind that he’d introduced AIDS to North America as Patient Zero. But that was the sensational claim made in 1987 by San Francisco journalist Randy Shilts in his bestseller about the AIDS
epidemic, And the Band Played On. Cementing Dugas’ legacy as a monstrous degenerate, the book provoked a spate of lurid headlines, and later a
cheesy HBO mini-series. It was a textbook case of “fake news” that “went
viral” before either term was even coined.
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 2:53:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/16/23 12:09 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 2:29:18 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/15/23 1:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 10:27:12 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/14/23 5:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more thanCome back when you have a credible source.
three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the Wuhan
Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from
journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag. >>>>>>>
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack,
claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are
“patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government >>>>>>> officials involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19. The >>>>>>> Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly >>>>>>> classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June,
potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to >>>>>>> Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s Substack project.
Fun fact: the usage "Patient Zero" is based on a misreading of the
letter 'O.' Randy Shilts wasn't perfect.
https://macleans.ca/culture/movies/how-a-typo-created-a-scapegoat-for-the-aids-epidemic/
When Darrow published his report, Patient 57 was renamed Patient O, with
the letter “O” standing for “Out-of-California.” Somewhere along the >> paper trail, the “O” got confused with a zero...
An irrelevant waste of time. Life is too short for you to go off topic.
The 'media' is where it is reported, the 'source' is the person divulging information to the reporter
On 6/16/23 3:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 2:53:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/16/23 12:09 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 2:29:18 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Fun fact: the usage "Patient Zero" is based on a misreading of the
On 6/15/23 1:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, June 15, 2023 at 10:27:12 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>> On 6/14/23 5:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
The first three patients to come down with COVID-19 more than >>>>>>> three-and-a-half years ago were lab researchers at the WuhanCome back when you have a credible source.
Institute of Virology (WIV), according to a new report from
journalists Michael Shellenberger, Matt Taibbi and Alex Gutentag. >>>>>>>
The report, published Tuesday on Shellenberger’s “Public” Substack,
claims Wuhan lab researchers Ben Hu, Yu Ping and Yan Zhu are
“patients zero” for COVID-19, citing anonymous U.S. government >>>>>>> officials involved in investigating the origins of COVID-19. The >>>>>>> Directorate of National Intelligence is expected to release formerly >>>>>>> classified material on the origins of COVID-19 later in June, >>>>>>> potentially including the names of the three scientists, according to
Public and Racket News, Taibbi’s Substack project.
letter 'O.' Randy Shilts wasn't perfect.
https://macleans.ca/culture/movies/how-a-typo-created-a-scapegoat-for-the-aids-epidemic/
When Darrow published his report, Patient 57 was renamed Patient O, with >> the letter “O” standing for “Out-of-California.” Somewhere along the
paper trail, the “O” got confused with a zero...
An irrelevant waste of time. Life is too short for you to go off topic.You all cited "patients zero," making it on topic.
The 'media' is where it is reported, the 'source' is the person divulging information to the reporterYes, in this case "anonymous U.S. government officials."
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 7:20:28 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 6/16/23 3:39 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 2:53:58 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
You all cited "patients zero," making it on topic.Fun fact: the usage "Patient Zero" is based on a misreading ofCome back when you have a credible source.
the letter 'O.' Randy Shilts wasn't perfect.
https://macleans.ca/culture/movies/how-a-typo-created-a-scapegoat-for-the-aids-epidemic/
When Darrow published his report, Patient 57 was renamed Patient O, with >>>> the letter “O” standing for “Out-of-California.” Somewhere
along the paper trail, the “O” got confused with a zero...
An irrelevant waste of time. Life is too short for you to go off
topic.
The topic isn't language, spelling, or typos.
The 'media' is where it is reported, the 'source' is the personYes, in this case "anonymous U.S. government officials."
divulging information to the reporter
that is about as usual as it gets, on either side. What is goog for
the goose, is good for the gander, assuming geese aren't
transsexuals.
The 'media' is where it is reported, the 'source' is the personYes, in this case "anonymous U.S. government officials."
divulging information to the reporter
that is about as usual as it gets, on either side. What is goog forThank you for giving up by both-sidesing it.
the goose, is good for the gander, assuming geese aren't
transsexuals.
Shellenberger's previous anonymous sources say the Pentagon is hiding evidence of alien spacecraft.
O
Thank you for giving up by both-sidesing it.The 'media' is where it is reported, the 'source' is the personYes, in this case "anonymous U.S. government officials."
divulging information to the reporter
that is about as usual as it gets, on either side. What is goog for
the goose, is good for the gander, assuming geese aren't
transsexuals.
That is NOT giving up. That is being fair, being balance, and being REAL.
Your myopic one-sidedness is being just a partisan hack, married
to an ideological agenda, and not seeing the complete picture.
That is NOT giving up. That is being fair, being balance, and being REAL.No, it's unfair and unreal because you're projecting your story's faults
onto any story with anonymous sources.
Your myopic one-sidedness is being just a partisan hack, married
to an ideological agenda, and not seeing the complete picture.
I'm way ahead of you on this particular complete picture. Go ahead and
check. I kept an open mind for months, if not years, until sufficient
science emerged to support the already enormously likely zoonotic
transfer hypothesis.
And if real evidence to the contrary comes out, I'll accept it.
onto any story with anonymous sources.
That is NOT giving up. That is being fair, being balance, and being REAL. >> No, it's unfair and unreal because you're projecting your story's faults
Good Lordy!!!!!!!!!!!
You're the one incessantly complaining about anonymous sources.
Your myopic one-sidedness is being just a partisan hack, married
to an ideological agenda, and not seeing the complete picture.
I'm way ahead of you on this particular complete picture. Go ahead and
check. I kept an open mind for months, if not years, until sufficient
science emerged to support the already enormously likely zoonotic
transfer hypothesis.
Open minded?
You won't follow blind links to explore any sources
that are not in your echo chamber.
And if real evidence to the contrary comes out, I'll accept it.
No Russian collusion
Hunter's laptop
uselessness of COVID masking
negative effects of COVID lockdowns.
Biden corruption with numerous overseas payments
and now Wuhan lab leak
Biden corruption with numerous overseas paymentsSo not proven.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 153:46:37 |
Calls: | 10,383 |
Files: | 14,054 |
Messages: | 6,417,842 |