• Trevor's favorite holiday, Juneteenth

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 18 10:05:42 2023
    How to celebrate? Shoot somebody.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/shooting-juneteenth-celebration-leaves-20-shot-1-dead-chicago-suburb

    They quit commenting on who is shooting who....cuz that's just so irrelevant.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sun Jun 18 14:18:48 2023
    On 6/18/23 12:05 PM, ScottW wrote:
    How to celebrate? Shoot somebody.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/shooting-juneteenth-celebration-leaves-20-shot-1-dead-chicago-suburb

    They quit commenting on who is shooting who....cuz that's just so irrelevant.

    There are so many mass shooting in the US it would remarkable if there
    wasn't one on Juneteenth.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mass-shooting-chicago-juneteenth-dead-injured-rcna89920

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 19 00:02:51 2023
    On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:18:50 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 6/18/23 12:05 PM, ScottW wrote:
    How to celebrate? Shoot somebody.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/shooting-juneteenth-celebration-leaves-20-shot-1-dead-chicago-suburb

    They quit commenting on who is shooting who....cuz that's just so irrelevant.
    There are so many mass shooting in the US it would remarkable if there wasn't one on Juneteenth.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mass-shooting-chicago-juneteenth-dead-injured-rcna89920

    suspect is a juvie. Already illegal for him to own or possess a gun

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 18 23:21:32 2023
    On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:18:50 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 6/18/23 12:05 PM, ScottW wrote:
    How to celebrate? Shoot somebody.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/shooting-juneteenth-celebration-leaves-20-shot-1-dead-chicago-suburb

    They quit commenting on who is shooting who....cuz that's just so irrelevant.
    There are so many mass shooting in the US it would remarkable if there wasn't one on Juneteenth.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mass-shooting-chicago-juneteenth-dead-injured-rcna89920

    Too many criminals out there.
    Too many released on no bail and low bail.
    Too many criminals not prosecuted
    Too many criminals with reduced charges.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Mon Jun 19 18:09:39 2023
    On 19/06/2023 5:02 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:18:50 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 6/18/23 12:05 PM, ScottW wrote:
    How to celebrate? Shoot somebody.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/shooting-juneteenth-celebration-leaves-20-shot-1-dead-chicago-suburb

    They quit commenting on who is shooting who....cuz that's just so
    irrelevant.
    There are so many mass shooting in the US it would remarkable if there
    wasn't one on Juneteenth.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mass-shooting-chicago-juneteenth-dead-injured-rcna89920

    suspect is a juvie. Already illegal for him to own or possess a gun


    **At some point in it's life, that gun was sold as a legal object. At
    another point, it was sold by (or stolen from) it's legal owner. It was acquired by a person who should not have it. US gun laws do little to
    prevent such an occurrence. Australia's gun laws do.

    Good, strong, cohesive gun laws in the US are continually thwarted by Republican politicians, who act for the NRA and the firearms industry
    and not the US population.




    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Mon Jun 19 08:51:24 2023
    On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 1:09:42 AM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 19/06/2023 5:02 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:18:50 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 6/18/23 12:05 PM, ScottW wrote:
    How to celebrate? Shoot somebody.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/shooting-juneteenth-celebration-leaves-20-shot-1-dead-chicago-suburb

    They quit commenting on who is shooting who....cuz that's just so
    irrelevant.
    There are so many mass shooting in the US it would remarkable if there
    wasn't one on Juneteenth.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mass-shooting-chicago-juneteenth-dead-injured-rcna89920

    suspect is a juvie. Already illegal for him to own or possess a gun

    **At some point in it's life, that gun was sold as a legal object. At another point, it was sold by (or stolen from) it's legal owner. It was acquired by a person who should not have it. US gun laws do little to prevent such an occurrence. Australia's gun laws do.

    Good, strong, cohesive gun laws in the US are continually thwarted by Republican politicians, who act for the NRA and the firearms industry
    and not the US population.

    BS. Here's some latest polling.

    53% is not a strong enough majority to force significant change.
    And if anyone put forward an Australia like gun control proposal....it would get a strong
    "hell no" from a large majority.

    You're just ignorant of the reality and resort to partisan blowhard BS as usual.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Mon Jun 19 10:38:04 2023
    On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:09:42 AM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:


    **At some point in it's life, that gun was sold as a legal object. At another point, it was sold by (or stolen from) it's legal owner. It was acquired by a person who should not have it. US gun laws do little to prevent such an occurrence. Australia's gun laws do.

    No additional law will prevent the theft of a gun. That theft is already an illegal
    act. As far as private sales, I would agree that buyers should have to go through the same background checks, as is they bought it from a gun store.
    But that is just nibbling at the edges, and probably won't make
    much difference in the stats, because that is not where the problem of
    criminal violence lies.



    Good, strong, cohesive gun laws in the US are continually thwarted by Republican politicians, who act for the NRA and the firearms industry
    and not the US population.


    The gun laws we already have, especially regarding use and possession,
    are not enforced very well. and that is the fault of Democrat politicians running
    the large US cities.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Mon Jun 19 10:39:08 2023
    On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 11:51:25 AM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 1:09:42 AM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 19/06/2023 5:02 pm, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Sunday, June 18, 2023 at 3:18:50 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 6/18/23 12:05 PM, ScottW wrote:
    How to celebrate? Shoot somebody.

    https://justthenews.com/nation/crime/shooting-juneteenth-celebration-leaves-20-shot-1-dead-chicago-suburb

    They quit commenting on who is shooting who....cuz that's just so
    irrelevant.
    There are so many mass shooting in the US it would remarkable if there >> wasn't one on Juneteenth.

    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/mass-shooting-chicago-juneteenth-dead-injured-rcna89920

    suspect is a juvie. Already illegal for him to own or possess a gun

    **At some point in it's life, that gun was sold as a legal object. At another point, it was sold by (or stolen from) it's legal owner. It was acquired by a person who should not have it. US gun laws do little to prevent such an occurrence. Australia's gun laws do.

    Good, strong, cohesive gun laws in the US are continually thwarted by Republican politicians, who act for the NRA and the firearms industry
    and not the US population.
    BS. Here's some latest polling.

    53% is not a strong enough majority to force significant change.
    And if anyone put forward an Australia like gun control proposal....it would get a strong
    "hell no" from a large majority.

    You're just ignorant of the reality and resort to partisan blowhard BS as usual.

    ScottW

    Trevor is a lunatic. You can't reason with him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Tue Jun 20 05:42:58 2023
    On 20/06/2023 3:38 am, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:09:42 AM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:


    **At some point in it's life, that gun was sold as a legal object. At
    another point, it was sold by (or stolen from) it's legal owner. It was
    acquired by a person who should not have it. US gun laws do little to
    prevent such an occurrence. Australia's gun laws do.

    No additional law will prevent the theft of a gun.

    **It can. The suite of gun laws enacted by Australia in 1997, included
    the requirement that ALL firearms, when not in use, must be stored in an approved, locked container, separated from ammunition. This simple
    expedient did three things:

    * It prevented children from accessing firearms. Children shooting up
    schools is unknown in Australia and anyone caught storing a firearm
    outside an approved container (aka: Gun safe) will have their gun
    ownership privileges revoked and their firearms confiscated.

    * It dramatically reduced the incidence of firearms theft. By around
    90%, in fact. Moreover, since every legal firearm is registered to a
    specific owner, all owners will immediately report such a theft, as part
    of their legal duty. Failure to so will incur penalties.

    That theft is already an illegal
    act. As far as private sales, I would agree that buyers should have to go through the same background checks, as is they bought it from a gun store. But that is just nibbling at the edges, and probably won't make
    much difference in the stats, because that is not where the problem of criminal violence lies.

    **It is a big part of the problem.




    Good, strong, cohesive gun laws in the US are continually thwarted by
    Republican politicians, who act for the NRA and the firearms industry
    and not the US population.


    The gun laws we already have, especially regarding use and possession,
    are not enforced very well. and that is the fault of Democrat politicians running
    the large US cities.

    **So you say, but it is the Republicans that prevent good, strong,
    cohesive laws from being enacted.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 19 13:41:39 2023
    The Shmoo-Sack crawls out of their private fantasy dimension, lies dangling from their pendulous lips and a miasma of foul nightmare stench permeating their wake.

    The gun laws we already have, especially regarding use and possession,
    are not enforced very well. and that is the fault of Democrat politicians running
    the large US cities.

    This is nothing but backwash from Sacktard's unplumbed religious septic pit. They might believe it, but they are too deluded to have any notion of what humans with functioning brains accept as fact.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Tue Jun 20 07:07:17 2023
    On 20/06/2023 5:42 am, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 20/06/2023 3:38 am, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Monday, June 19, 2023 at 4:09:42 AM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:

    **At some point in it's life, that gun was sold as a legal object. At
    another point, it was sold by (or stolen from) it's legal owner. It was
    acquired by a person who should not have it. US gun laws do little to
    prevent such an occurrence. Australia's gun laws do.

    No additional law will prevent the theft of a gun.

    **It can. The suite of gun laws enacted by Australia in 1997, included
    the requirement that ALL firearms, when not in use, must be stored in an approved, locked container, separated from ammunition. This simple
    expedient did three things:

    * It prevented children from accessing firearms. Children shooting up
    schools is unknown in Australia and anyone caught storing a firearm
    outside an approved container (aka: Gun safe) will have their gun
    ownership privileges revoked and their firearms confiscated.

    * It dramatically reduced the incidence of firearms theft. By around
    90%, in fact. Moreover, since every legal firearm is registered to a
    specific owner, all owners will immediately report such a theft, as part
    of their legal duty. Failure to so will incur penalties.


    **It is thought to have reduced the incidence of murder by family
    members. No way of confirming this, of course, but, logically, if a
    great of effort is required to use a firearm (unlock the safe for the
    gun, then unlock the separate ammunition container, load the gun), then
    perhaps things may have cooled somewhat.


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 19 20:27:23 2023
    No additional law will prevent the theft of a gun.
    **It can. The suite of gun laws enacted by Australia in 1997, included
    the requirement that ALL firearms, when not in use, must be stored in an approved, locked container, separated from ammunition. This simple
    expedient did three things:

    * It prevented children from accessing firearms. Children shooting up
    schools is unknown in Australia and anyone caught storing a firearm
    outside an approved container (aka: Gun safe) will have their gun
    ownership privileges revoked and their firearms confiscated.

    * It dramatically reduced the incidence of firearms theft. By around
    90%, in fact. Moreover, since every legal firearm is registered to a
    specific owner, all owners will immediately report such a theft, as part
    of their legal duty. Failure to so will incur penalties.

    Criminals are what they are. Criminals. They don't obey such laws.
    They are not going to properly house their firearms until their next armed robbery.



    That theft is already an illegal
    act. As far as private sales, I would agree that buyers should have to go through the same background checks, as is they bought it from a gun store. But that is just nibbling at the edges, and probably won't make
    much difference in the stats, because that is not where the problem of criminal violence lies.
    **It is a big part of the problem.

    No. It is not. Most gun violence is done by repeat criminals.
    They don't acquire their guns that way,




    Good, strong, cohesive gun laws in the US are continually thwarted by
    Republican politicians, who act for the NRA and the firearms industry
    and not the US population.


    The gun laws we already have, especially regarding use and possession,
    are not enforced very well. and that is the fault of Democrat politicians running
    the large US cities.

    Laws that won't solve the problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Tue Jun 20 15:16:08 2023
    On 20/06/2023 1:27 pm, Art Sackman wrote:

    No additional law will prevent the theft of a gun.
    **It can. The suite of gun laws enacted by Australia in 1997, included
    the requirement that ALL firearms, when not in use, must be stored in an
    approved, locked container, separated from ammunition. This simple
    expedient did three things:

    * It prevented children from accessing firearms. Children shooting up
    schools is unknown in Australia and anyone caught storing a firearm
    outside an approved container (aka: Gun safe) will have their gun
    ownership privileges revoked and their firearms confiscated.

    * It dramatically reduced the incidence of firearms theft. By around
    90%, in fact. Moreover, since every legal firearm is registered to a
    specific owner, all owners will immediately report such a theft, as part
    of their legal duty. Failure to so will incur penalties.

    Criminals are what they are. Criminals. They don't obey such laws.

    **And, in the US, legal gun owners don't obey laws that don't exist.

    They are not going to properly house their firearms until their next armed robbery.



    That theft is already an illegal
    act. As far as private sales, I would agree that buyers should have to go >>> through the same background checks, as is they bought it from a gun store. >>> But that is just nibbling at the edges, and probably won't make
    much difference in the stats, because that is not where the problem of
    criminal violence lies.
    **It is a big part of the problem.

    No. It is not. Most gun violence is done by repeat criminals.
    They don't acquire their guns that way,

    **Don't they? How do they acquire their guns?





    Good, strong, cohesive gun laws in the US are continually thwarted by
    Republican politicians, who act for the NRA and the firearms industry
    and not the US population.


    The gun laws we already have, especially regarding use and possession,
    are not enforced very well. and that is the fault of Democrat politicians running
    the large US cities.

    Laws that won't solve the problem.

    **That is a broad, ignorant claim. Points:

    * You cannot prove it.
    * The 1996 gun control laws seems to have worked very well over here.
    Why do you think they won't work in the US?

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Tue Jun 20 09:48:13 2023
    On 6/20/23 12:16 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    * The 1996 gun control laws seems to have worked very well over here.
    Why do you think they won't work in the US?

    The 1994 assault weapons ban, limited as it was, was effective:

    https://theconversation.com/did-the-assault-weapons-ban-of-1994-bring-down-mass-shootings-heres-what-the-data-tells-us-184430

    During the 1994-2004 ban:

    In the years after the assault weapons ban went into effect, the number
    of deaths from mass shootings fell, and the increase in the annual
    number of incidents slowed down. Even including 1999’s Columbine High
    School massacre – the deadliest mass shooting during the period of the
    ban – the 1994 to 2004 period saw lower average annual rates of both
    mass shootings and deaths resulting from such incidents than before the
    ban’s inception.

    From 2004 onward:

    The data shows an almost immediate – and steep – rise in mass shooting deaths in the years after the assault weapons ban expired in 2004.

    Breaking the data into absolute numbers, between 2004 and 2017 – the
    last year of our analysis – the average number of yearly deaths
    attributed to mass shootings was 25, compared with 5.3 during the
    10-year tenure of the ban and 7.2 in the years leading up to the
    prohibition on assault weapons.

    Saving hundreds of lives

    We calculated that the risk of a person in the U.S. dying in a mass
    shooting was 70% lower during the period in which the assault weapons
    ban was active. The proportion of overall gun homicides resulting from
    mass shootings was also down, with nine fewer mass-shooting-related
    fatalities per 10,000 shooting deaths.

    Scientific version:

    https://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/Abstract/2019/01000/Changes_in_US_mass_shooting_deaths_associated_with.2.aspx

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 20 12:34:57 2023
    On Mo

    **At some point in it's life, that gun was sold as a legal object. At
    another point, it was sold by (or stolen from) it's legal owner. It was acquired by a person who should not have it. US gun laws do little to
    prevent such an occurrence. Australia's gun laws do.

    v



    gun laws make certain sales illegal, however, they do not PREVENT them. Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 20 12:43:33 2023
    On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 10:48:18 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 6/20/23 12:16 AM, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    * The 1996 gun control laws seems to have worked very well over here.
    Why do you think they won't work in the US?
    The 1994 assault weapons ban, limited as it was, was effective:

    https://theconversation.com/did-the-assault-weapons-ban-of-1994-bring-down-mass-shootings-heres-what-the-data-tells-us-184430

    During the 1994-2004 ban:

    In the years after the assault weapons ban went into effect, the number
    of deaths from mass shootings fell, and the increase in the annual
    number of incidents slowed down. Even including 1999’s Columbine High School massacre – the deadliest mass shooting during the period of the
    ban – the 1994 to 2004 period saw lower average annual rates of both
    mass shootings and deaths resulting from such incidents than before the ban’s inception.

    From 2004 onward:

    The data shows an almost immediate – and steep – rise in mass shooting deaths in the years after the assault weapons ban expired in 2004.

    Breaking the data into absolute numbers, between 2004 and 2017 – the
    last year of our analysis – the average number of yearly deaths
    attributed to mass shootings was 25, compared with 5.3 during the
    10-year tenure of the ban and 7.2 in the years leading up to the
    prohibition on assault weapons.

    Saving hundreds of lives

    We calculated that the risk of a person in the U.S. dying in a mass
    shooting was 70% lower during the period in which the assault weapons
    ban was active. The proportion of overall gun homicides resulting from
    mass shootings was also down, with nine fewer mass-shooting-related fatalities per 10,000 shooting deaths.

    Scientific version:

    https://journals.lww.com/jtrauma/Abstract/2019/01000/Changes_in_US_mass_shooting_deaths_associated_with.2.aspx



    based on 2021 data, statistically, it would have saved 21 lives
    My chances of dying in a mass shooting, 2021, was one in 11.3 million.
    If my chances were improved by 70%, it would
    have been one in 18.4 million.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Wed Jun 21 08:12:05 2023
    On 21/06/2023 5:34 am, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Mo

    **At some point in it's life, that gun was sold as a legal object. At
    another point, it was sold by (or stolen from) it's legal owner. It was
    acquired by a person who should not have it. US gun laws do little to
    prevent such an occurrence. Australia's gun laws do.

    v



    gun laws make certain sales illegal, however, they do not PREVENT them.

    **Australia's gun laws make the chances of a secondary sale, without
    proper paperwork submitted to authorities, to ANYONE (criminal or not) EXTREMELY rare.

    I will say once more:

    In the ten years prior to the 1996 gun control implementation
    (implemented in 1997), there was an average of one mass murder event,
    via the use of firearms. In the 26 years since the gun laws were
    implemented, there has been ONE.

    A dramatic and significant reduction.

    A few other benefits have accrued as well. Gun theft has fallen
    dramatically (due to the mandatory implementation of gun safes for ALL
    gun owners). Gun crime, generally, has fallen somewhat.

    https://www.gunsafetyalliance.org.au/the-stats/

    Examine the dramatic fall from 1996 on. Australians are now
    approximately TWENTY TIMES less likely to be shot to death than
    Americans are.


    Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.

    **A common and oft-cited misconception. Habitual criminals do not
    violate all laws. They will violate as few laws as possible.



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to Fascist Flea on Wed Jun 21 09:18:06 2023
    On 21/06/2023 9:16 am, Fascist Flea wrote:
    Trevor Wilson wrote:

    Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.
    **A common and oft-cited misconception. Habitual criminals do not
    violate all laws. They will violate as few laws as possible.

    I believe that is true. I read a statistic about that once upon a time. Non-insane gun offenders are wary of ANY encounter with the law.
    They avoid traffic infractions like the plague. The experience of being "known to the police" is a reminder to stay out of their sight as much as possible.



    **Of course. Crazy criminals do not stay on the streets for long.

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Tue Jun 20 16:16:14 2023
    Trevor Wilson wrote:

    Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.
    **A common and oft-cited misconception. Habitual criminals do not
    violate all laws. They will violate as few laws as possible.

    I believe that is true. I read a statistic about that once upon a time. Non-insane gun offenders are wary of ANY encounter with the law.
    They avoid traffic infractions like the plague. The experience of being
    "known to the police" is a reminder to stay out of their sight as much as possible.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Tue Jun 20 16:43:31 2023
    On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 4:18:09 PM UTC-7, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 21/06/2023 9:16 am, Fascist Flea wrote:
    Trevor Wilson wrote:

    Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.
    **A common and oft-cited misconception. Habitual criminals do not
    violate all laws. They will violate as few laws as possible.

    I believe that is true. I read a statistic about that once upon a time. Non-insane gun offenders are wary of ANY encounter with the law.
    They avoid traffic infractions like the plague. The experience of being "known to the police" is a reminder to stay out of their sight as much as possible.


    **Of course. Crazy criminals do not stay on the streets for long.

    Nah....they head for America's cities where dem DA's will let roam freely.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Tue Jun 20 17:46:51 2023
    On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:18:09 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 21/06/2023 9:16 am, Fascist Flea wrote:
    Trevor Wilson wrote:

    Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.
    **A common and oft-cited misconception. Habitual criminals do not
    violate all laws. They will violate as few laws as possible.

    I believe that is true. I read a statistic about that once upon a time. Non-insane gun offenders are wary of ANY encounter with the law.
    They avoid traffic infractions like the plague. The experience of being "known to the police" is a reminder to stay out of their sight as much as possible.


    **Of course. Crazy criminals do not stay on the streets for long.
    --


    T

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Tue Jun 20 17:57:23 2023
    On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:18:09 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 21/06/2023 9:16 am, Fascist Flea wrote:
    Trevor Wilson wrote:

    Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.
    **A common and oft-cited misconception. Habitual criminals do not
    violate all laws. They will violate as few laws as possible.

    I believe that is true. I read a statistic about that once upon a time. Non-insane gun offenders are wary of ANY encounter with the law.
    They avoid traffic infractions like the plague. The experience of being "known to the police" is a reminder to stay out of their sight as much as possible.


    **Of course. Crazy criminals do not stay on the streets for long.
    --


    That is just a truly insane thing to say.
    This type of rap sheet is very common in AMerican cities,

    https://www.klfy.com/local/accused-murder-suspect-has-long-rap-sheet/

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/local-bully-with-long-rap-sheet-arrested-in-fatal-sucker-punch-mugging-of-man

    https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2017/05/02/man-suspected-shooting-paramedics-had-long-rap-sheet/101190024/


    YOU GUYS DOWN UNDER EVEN HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM


    https://www.smh.com.au/national/queensland/long-rap-sheet-reveals-a-hardened-crim-as-manhunt-continues-20180628-p4zofe.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Trevor Wilson@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Wed Jun 21 11:01:44 2023
    On 21/06/2023 10:57 am, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:18:09 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 21/06/2023 9:16 am, Fascist Flea wrote:
    Trevor Wilson wrote:

    Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.
    **A common and oft-cited misconception. Habitual criminals do not
    violate all laws. They will violate as few laws as possible.

    I believe that is true. I read a statistic about that once upon a time.
    Non-insane gun offenders are wary of ANY encounter with the law.
    They avoid traffic infractions like the plague. The experience of being
    "known to the police" is a reminder to stay out of their sight as much as possible.


    **Of course. Crazy criminals do not stay on the streets for long.
    --


    That is just a truly insane thing to say.

    **Nope. Career criminals avoid breaking laws that don't benefit their
    bottom line. That is just logic and common sense. Crazy criminals are unpredictable, which is why restricting gun ownership and the buying and selling of firearms is good public policy.

    This type of rap sheet is very common in AMerican cities,

    https://www.klfy.com/local/accused-murder-suspect-has-long-rap-sheet/

    https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/local-bully-with-long-rap-sheet-arrested-in-fatal-sucker-punch-mugging-of-man

    https://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/nation/2017/05/02/man-suspected-shooting-paramedics-had-long-rap-sheet/101190024/


    YOU GUYS DOWN UNDER EVEN HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM


    https://www.smh.com.au/national/queensland/long-rap-sheet-reveals-a-hardened-crim-as-manhunt-continues-20180628-p4zofe.html



    **Sure. We have bad guys down here. The big difference is that far fewer
    people are shot to death.



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to Trevor Wilson on Tue Jun 20 21:30:26 2023
    On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 9:01:46 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 21/06/2023 10:57 am, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Tuesday, June 20, 2023 at 7:18:09 PM UTC-4, Trevor Wilson wrote:
    On 21/06/2023 9:16 am, Fascist Flea wrote:
    Trevor Wilson wrote:

    Habitual Criminals habitually do criminal things.
    **A common and oft-cited misconception. Habitual criminals do not
    violate all laws. They will violate as few laws as possible.

    I believe that is true. I read a statistic about that once upon a time. >>> Non-insane gun offenders are wary of ANY encounter with the law.
    They avoid traffic infractions like the plague. The experience of being >>> "known to the police" is a reminder to stay out of their sight as much as possible.


    **Of course. Crazy criminals do not stay on the streets for long.
    --


    That is just a truly insane thing to say.
    **Nope. Career criminals avoid breaking laws that don't benefit their
    bottom line. That is just logic and common sense. Crazy criminals are unpredictable, which is why restricting gun ownership and the buying and selling of firearms is good public policy.

    You have no idea what goes on here. Crazy criminals roam the streets of American cities.
    They have often have rap sheets with over 20 crimes, sometimes as much as 40
    we don't institutionalize them, and we let them out
    on no bail, and reduce charges, and hand out weak sentences.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)