The mass shooter who shot and killed five people in Philadelphia on Monday — Independence Day eve — has been identified as Kimbrady Carriker. Carriker, 40, allegedly shot people indiscriminately in the Kingessing neighborhood, killing four men anda 15-year-old teenage boy. He also allegedly wounded a two-year-old and a 13-year-old, who were both shot multiple times in the legs. Another two-year-old and a 33-year-old woman were hit by flying glass as a result of the shooting.
Police have no known motive yet for the shooting, and the alleged killer has no known connection to any of the victims at this point. The suspect was wearing a bulletproof vest and had an AR-15 with multiple magazines as well as a handgun.
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman, including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and earrings.
and this one....
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
ScottW
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman,
including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman, including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, andNot trans.
earrings.
and this one....
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman, including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, andNot trans.
earrings.
and this one....
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 8:34:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman, including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, andNot trans.
earrings.
and this one....
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter isJust like you and white nationalists.....I gotta admit...it sucks to be you.
trans in order to muddy the waters?
ScottW
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 8:34:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman,
including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
Just like you and white nationalists.....I gotta admit...it sucks to be you.
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman,
including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman,
including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.aDidn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on a
single photo?
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman,
including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.aDidn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on a
single photo?
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on a
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman,
including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
single photo?
what the hell does that mean?
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a
woman, including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s
clothes, and earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a
shooter is trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
a single photo?
I don't think so.
My assessment is based on multiple reports including one that"They" is not a tg pronoun and that "source" is the DA's office who now
identified her use of tg pronouns
On 7/5/23 1:50 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on a
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman, >>>>> including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is >>>> trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
single photo?
what the hell does that mean?It doesn't mean Scott waited to see in order to clarify.
On 7/5/23 10:44 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 8:34:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman,
including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
Just like you and white nationalists.....I gotta admit...it sucks to be you.I don't make immediate claims about mass shootings, so, rubber, glue.
I'm on the trans band wagon.
ScottW
On 7/5/23 1:50 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on a
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman, >>>>> including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is >>>> trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
single photo?
what the hell does that mean?It doesn't mean Scott waited to see in order to clarify.
On 7/5/23 1:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a
woman, including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s
clothes, and earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a
shooter is trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
a single photo?
I don't think so.This thread subject is "Trans moving up on the domestic terrorist threat list."
My assessment is based on multiple reports including one that"They" is not a tg pronoun and that "source" is the DA's office who now
identified her use of tg pronouns
call its use a mistake.
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 9:39:12 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 10:44 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 8:34:57 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:I don't make immediate claims about mass shootings, so, rubber, glue.
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman,
including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is
trans in order to muddy the waters?
Just like you and white nationalists.....I gotta admit...it sucks to be you.
Even after long periods of contemplation and all the evidence is in.... you still end up completely wrong.
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 2:33:52 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 1:50 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:It doesn't mean Scott waited to see in order to clarify.
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on a
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman, >>>>>>> including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is >>>>>> trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
single photo?
what the hell does that mean?
I'm on the trans band wagon.
Given how hormonally f'd up they are....do you think trans people should
pass a normal gun application check?
Perhaps their "therapists" should be involved.
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 5:32:46 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 1:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:This thread subject is "Trans moving up on the domestic terrorist
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans
wrote:
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as
a woman, including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s
clothes, and earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a
shooter is trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
based on a single photo?
I don't think so.
threat list."
what does that have to do with a single photo? nothing at all
My assessment is based on multiple reports including one that"They" is not a tg pronoun and that "source" is the DA's office who
identified her use of tg pronouns
now call its use a mistake.
"Some transgender people use pronoun they because they feel it is
more accurate to their gender identity than the pronouns assigned to
them at birth. For others, using pronoun they is a way to signal
their transgender status to others. Still others use pronoun they
simply because they prefer it."
Why Do *Some* Transgender People Use The Pronoun They - Sdlgbtn
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 5:33:52 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 1:50 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:It doesn't mean Scott waited to see in order to clarify.
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans based on a
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as a woman, >>>>>>> including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s clothes, and
earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a shooter is >>>>>> trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
single photo?
what the hell does that mean?
It doesn't mean he didn't
On 7/5/23 6:19 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 5:32:46 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 1:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 12:40:07 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:This thread subject is "Trans moving up on the domestic terrorist
On 7/5/23 10:49 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Wednesday, July 5, 2023 at 11:34:57 AM UTC-4, mINE109Didn't Scott just do that by implying the shooter is trans
wrote:
On 7/4/23 11:01 PM, ScottW wrote:
Carriker seems to defy a lot of narratives.Not trans.
In March, Carriker posted pictures of himself dressed as
a woman, including photos of him wearing a bra, women’s
clothes, and earrings.
and this one....Yes, that's something a liberal would say.
"“I lubricate my AR-15 with liberal tears.”
Isn't there a right-wing trope of immediately claiming a
shooter is trans in order to muddy the waters?
no! we wait and see. we don't muddy. We clarify.a
based on a single photo?
I don't think so.
threat list."
what does that have to do with a single photo? nothing at allThen ask Scott why he brought it photos in the body of his post.
Meanwhile, he's doubled down on the claim with no evidence but the echo chamber.
I see there's a set of three photos all taken about the same time.
My assessment is based on multiple reports including one that"They" is not a tg pronoun and that "source" is the DA's office who
identified her use of tg pronouns
now call its use a mistake.
"Some transgender people use pronoun they because they feel it is"Some" do, yes. That doesn't make it exclusively tg, as anyone can
more accurate to their gender identity than the pronouns assigned to
them at birth. For others, using pronoun they is a way to signal
their transgender status to others. Still others use pronoun they
simply because they prefer it."
prefer it.
Why Do *Some* Transgender People Use The Pronoun They - Sdlgbtn
The point is to *not* specify gender.
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 10:59:33 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 6:19 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Why Do *Some* Transgender People Use The Pronoun They - Sdlgbtn
The point is to *not* specify gender.
"It" works fine
"They" conveys a duality, or more.
On 7/6/23 3:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 10:59:33 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/5/23 6:19 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Why Do *Some* Transgender People Use The Pronoun They - Sdlgbtn
The point is to *not* specify gender.
"It" works fineExcept for the de-humanizing.
"They" conveys a duality, or more.It's a centuries-old way of reference without specifying gender,
including for a single person.
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 4:49:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/6/23 3:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 10:59:33 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Except for the de-humanizing.
On 7/5/23 6:19 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Why Do *Some* Transgender People Use The Pronoun They -
Sdlgbtn
The point is to *not* specify gender.
"It" works fine
"They" conveys a duality, or more.It's a centuries-old way of reference without specifying gender,
including for a single person.
That's odd! Not a one of my grammar teachers from K to 12 ever
mentioned that. It's only a thing that has emerged within the past
two years.
Back when i was in school, if you attached "they" with a singular
verb, oune would get smacked down. If one were to say 'they is", that
person would find themselves sitting in the corner of the classroom
wearing a dunce cap.
On 7/7/23 4:57 AM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 4:49:12 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/6/23 3:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 10:59:33 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:Except for the de-humanizing.
On 7/5/23 6:19 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
Why Do *Some* Transgender People Use The Pronoun They -
Sdlgbtn
The point is to *not* specify gender.
"It" works fine
"They" conveys a duality, or more.It's a centuries-old way of reference without specifying gender,
including for a single person.
That's odd! Not a one of my grammar teachers from K to 12 everThe "singular they" dates back to the 1300s and can be found in Chaucer, Shakespeare and Austen.
mentioned that. It's only a thing that has emerged within the past
two years.
The emphasis on gender identity is recent but not "the past two years."
The American Psychological Association endorsed it in 2019, when it was Mirriam-Webster's "Word of the Year."
Here's the bbc from 2015:
https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34901704
In college from 2009:
https://www.aacrao.org/events-training/event/2015/07/13/default-calendar/preferred-name-and-pronoun-at-the-university-of-vermont--how-we-did-it-and-what-we-ve-learned
"In 2009, the University of Vermont became the first school to provide students the ability to enter a preferred name and pronoun in Banner."
Back when i was in school, if you attached "they" with a singularIt still requires the correct verb. Dunce cap? Were you educated in The Little House on the Prairie?
verb, oune would get smacked down. If one were to say 'they is", that person would find themselves sitting in the corner of the classroom wearing a dunce cap.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 45:56:33 |
| Calls: | 10,394 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,066 |
| Messages: | 6,417,271 |
