On 7/7/23 9:57 PM, ScottW wrote:
Steven Sund [who] was totally non-political...I mean this was not
some right-wing activist, he was the chief of Capitol police on
January 6, and he said, 'Oh yeah, that crowd was filled with federal
agents.'
The same Sund who blamed his own lack of preparation on lack of
intelligence from the FBI?
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/other/tucker-carlson-shares-details-of-never-aired-capitol-riot-interview/ar-AA1dA6qv
It's well-known the J6 committee didn't have public hearings on the intelligence failures (other fish to fry) but they did interview Sund.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/jan-6-transcripts-detail-numerous-warning-signs-potential-violence-cap-rcna63647
"Sund, the former Capitol Police chief who resigned the day after the
attack, said that intelligence he received didn't "send up a bunch of
red flags for me" because most protests target Congress. Harvin, the
former chief of homeland security and intelligence for D.C., told the
committee that Sund shouldn't characterize what happened as an
intelligence failure, but as a failure to act on intelligence.
“He said it was intelligence failure," Harvin said. "It may have been an intelligence failure on his agency’s part and a failure to properly contextualize and pervade the threat environment, but it wasn’t an intelligence failure at large.”"
I'm impressed you heard about it at all:
https://twitter.com/MattGertz/status/1677395564948779008
Views for "Tucker Carlson on Twitter" posts (assume the number of people
who actually viewed the videos is much much lower).
Announcement: 137.1M
Ep. 1: 120M
Ep. 2: 60.6M
Ep. 3 (Trump indicted): 104.1M
Ep. 4: 32.4M
Ep. 5: 17.3M
Ep. 6: 32M
Ep. 7: 15.4M
Ep. 8: 8.6M
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)