• Why the Public School system should be bulldozed

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jul 18 16:56:59 2023
    They're just throwing our tax dollars away.

    https://redstate.com/jimthompson/2023/07/18/guy-who-repeatedly-failed-to-pass-the-nyc-teachers-exam-gets-over-2m-for-failing-to-pass-the-teachers-exam-n778591

    https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/nyc-bias-suit-black-hispanic-teachers-and-ex-teachers-rich/

    This is insane. Someone...please appeal....and run that judge out of town.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Wed Jul 19 09:42:21 2023
    On 7/18/23 6:56 PM, ScottW wrote:
    They're just throwing our tax dollars away.

    https://redstate.com/jimthompson/2023/07/18/guy-who-repeatedly-failed-to-pass-the-nyc-teachers-exam-gets-over-2m-for-failing-to-pass-the-teachers-exam-n778591

    https://nypost.com/2023/07/15/nyc-bias-suit-black-hispanic-teachers-and-ex-teachers-rich/

    This is insane. Someone...please appeal....and run that judge out of town.

    I'm sure those link to calm and definitely not cherry-picked reports
    that don't hold someone up to racist ridicule.

    And I'm sure there's a corroborating report somewhere other than the NY
    Post...

    https://gothamist.com/news/city-pay-largest-ever-settlement-nyc-teachers-affected-discriminatory-certification-tests

    "The teachers who never passed the certification tests “have been sort
    of per diem teachers for the last 20 years, you know— making
    exponentially less money and having no benefits, no health insurance, no pension, no nothing from the city, but still teaching more or less full time,” Sohn added."

    Let me know if the "guy" hadn't been working at a level that didn't
    require advanced levels, say, as a kindergarten teacher who failed trigonometry, etc.

    It seems unlikely there's a settlement for merely failing a
    certification exam as such.

    Here's someone else who got a settlement:

    https://www.ny1.com/nyc/all-boroughs/education/2022/09/30/former-teachers-who-sued-for-discrimination-begin-receiving-payments

    DeZonie lost her job as a teacher at the Harlem elementary school in the
    early 2000s – because she failed a state certification exam used by the
    city, called the Liberal Arts and Science Test. She went on to teach in
    private and charter schools, or in part-time positions assisting other
    teachers or at after-school programs – for less money, with less stability.

    She wasn’t alone. Black and Hispanic educators were disproportionately
    likely to fail the test. A group of them first sued over it in 1996, and
    in 2012, a judge ruled the exam was discriminatory.

    A special master began calculating what teachers like DeZonie would have
    earned if not for the test. NY1 first interviewed her in 2020 and she
    was skeptical she’d ever see a cent. But the city ultimately stopped appealing those awards, and began paying out last December.

    End quote.

    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education is
    presumably better than an urban public school!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 19 10:49:07 2023
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:





    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education is presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 19 14:40:02 2023
    On 7/19/23 2:17 PM, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 12:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:



    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education is
    presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.

    Yet they employ a teacher who failed the public school competency exam.

    To be fair, I'll cite this paper which the authors claim to be the first
    to examine charter school outcome, with a look at market innovation vs strategic behavior, "using two decades of data from the National
    Longitudinal School Database (NLSD), which includes nearly all districts
    in the U.S. from school years 1995 to 2016."

    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED622023.pdf

    "The Combined Effects of Charter Schools on Student Outcomes: A National Analysis of School Districts"

    Specifically for urban districts:

    "Prior literature suggests that charter schools have more positive
    effects in urban areas (CREDO 2013, Chabrier, Cohodes, and Oreopoulos
    2016), a finding that we confirm. Harris (2020) hypothesizes that this
    might be because urban districts have lower baseline achievement, which
    makes improvement somewhat easier to achieve. We find some suggestive
    evidence of this, though the estimates are imprecise. Additionally, we
    find that the effects are concentrated in middle schools and high
    schools, not elementary schools."

    An easier read:

    https://www.educationnext.org/bigger-picture-charter-school-results-national-analysis-system-level-effects-test-scores-graduation-rates/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Wed Jul 19 14:17:40 2023
    On 7/19/23 12:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:





    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education is
    presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.

    Yet they employ a teacher who failed the public school competency exam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 19 16:04:15 2023
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 12:17:43 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 12:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:





    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education is
    presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.
    Yet they employ a teacher who failed the public school competency exam.

    I'm not gonna defend the stupidity of requiring an exam and/or "overqualified" teachers.
    My sister was a teacher and she complained a lot about how stupidly the contracts
    incentivize teachers "continuing education" which ultimately results in their "overqualification"
    for which they get paid. She got her masters degree because it got her a big bump while she was still
    teaching 2nd graders. She took all their classes and eventually was told she had to either become
    an assistant principal or leave cuz they couldn't afford her even though it was their contract that said
    do this and you get this. Anyway, she left for a charter school and loved it for one simple reason.
    The focus was on educating the kids. The public schools seemed to think that better educated teachers
    guaranteed better educated kids...but it didn't. It sucked the budget up with better paid teachers.

    Anyway, I'll never accept that the exact same exam given to people is "racist" because of disproportionate outcome
    of results. That's misplaced blame....bigly.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 19 19:08:53 2023
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 3:40:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 2:17 PM, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 12:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:



    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education is
    presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.

    Yet they employ a teacher who failed the public school competency exam.
    To be fair, I'll cite this paper which the authors claim to be the first
    to examine charter school outcome, with a look at market innovation vs strategic behavior, "using two decades of data from the National Longitudinal School Database (NLSD), which includes nearly all districts
    in the U.S. from school years 1995 to 2016."

    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED622023.pdf

    "The Combined Effects of Charter Schools on Student Outcomes: A National Analysis of School Districts"

    Specifically for urban districts:

    "Prior literature suggests that charter schools have more positive
    effects in urban areas (CREDO 2013, Chabrier, Cohodes, and Oreopoulos
    2016), a finding that we confirm. Harris (2020) hypothesizes that this
    might be because urban districts have lower baseline achievement, which makes improvement somewhat easier to achieve. We find some suggestive evidence of this, though the estimates are imprecise. Additionally, we
    find that the effects are concentrated in middle schools and high
    schools, not elementary schools."

    An easier read:

    https://www.educationnext.org/bigger-picture-charter-school-results-national-analysis-system-level-effects-test-scores-graduation-rates/


    Whatever!

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school systems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 19 19:18:43 2023
    Is the Big Dumb Sack actually full of irony? All this time, I thought it was dung, either metaphorical or literal.

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school systems.

    Let's give a shout-out to the gloriously sheltered system that "educated" you. Was that Howard County, or Westchester? Or maybe Detroit?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to Fascist Flea on Wed Jul 19 19:25:46 2023
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:18:44 PM UTC-4, Fascist Flea wrote:
    Is the Big Dumb Sack actually full of irony? All this time, I thought it was dung, either metaphorical or literal.

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school systems.

    Let's give a shout-out to the gloriously sheltered system that "educated" you.
    Was that Howard County, or Westchester? Or maybe Detroit?

    I was educated in what was one of the best school systems,
    It was of an affluent suburban county.
    Otters are not so 'privileged' and should be offered
    better opportunities in charter or voucher funded private schools.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jul 19 20:51:30 2023
    The well of irony runneth over.

    Is the Big Dumb Sack actually full of irony? All this time, I thought it was
    dung, either metaphorical or literal.

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school systems.

    Let's give a shout-out to the gloriously sheltered system that "educated" you.
    Was that Howard County, or Westchester? Or maybe Detroit?

    I was educated

    BZZZZT!

    Incorrect usage - lose 1000 points. The correct term version is...

    I was "educated".

    Whatever training was offered to you did not take. You are as dense and ignorant as if you had been trapped in one of those urban schools you
    love to malign.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Thu Jul 20 07:34:21 2023
    On 7/19/23 6:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 12:17:43 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 12:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:





    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education
    is presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.
    Yet they employ a teacher who failed the public school competency
    exam.

    I'm not gonna defend the stupidity of requiring an exam and/or "overqualified" teachers. My sister was a teacher and she complained
    a lot about how stupidly the contracts incentivize teachers
    "continuing education" which ultimately results in their
    "overqualification" for which they get paid. She got her masters
    degree because it got her a big bump while she was still teaching 2nd graders. She took all their classes and eventually was told she had
    to either become an assistant principal or leave cuz they couldn't
    afford her even though it was their contract that said do this and
    you get this. Anyway, she left for a charter school and loved it
    for one simple reason. The focus was on educating the kids. The
    public schools seemed to think that better educated teachers
    guaranteed better educated kids...but it didn't. It sucked the
    budget up with better paid teachers.

    Even people who love public schools can have problems with school administration.

    Anyway, I'll never accept that the exact same exam given to people is "racist" because of disproportionate outcome of results. That's
    misplaced blame....bigly.

    So you didn't look past the headline? Whites passed at twice the rate of minorities.

    https://www.k12dive.com/news/nyc-board-of-ed-to-pay-teachers-hundreds-of-millions-in-damages-for-biased/621269/

    The state-mandated exam, the Liberal Arts and Sciences Test, was
    required for all public school teachers in the city from 1993 to 2014.
    White test-takers passed the test at an average rate of 93%, compared to
    just 53% of Black applicants and 50% of Latino applicants, according to
    the original complaint.

    Teachers who failed were still allowed in the classroom, but the BOE
    paid them reduced salaries and denied them benefits, plaintiffs said.
    Now, the agreement filed on March 14 requires the BOE to stop appealing judgments awarding approximately $660 million in damages to former Black
    and Latino teachers, according to Josh Sohn, an attorney for the plaintiffs.

    End quote.

    Creating a two-tiered teaching staff based on race with minorities paid
    less and not given benefits is an obvious disparate outcome.

    More:

    https://ccrjustice.org/home/press-center/press-releases/federal-court-rules-against-nyc-board-ed-teacher-exam-discriminated

    In 1993 and again in 1996, the State Education Department and the Board
    of Education mandated that all State and City teachers – entering and experienced teachers alike – pass written certification tests. Yet
    unlike new teachers entering the classroom, the teachers in this case
    had already earned master’s degrees, passed content specialty exams, completed other required course work, and received nothing but
    satisfactory evaluations in their many years of employment in the city
    schools. The men and women represented in this case lost their
    permanent teaching licenses, seniority, retention rights, and in some
    cases their tenured teaching positions, and had their salaries
    drastically reduced. The Board kept them teaching the same course load,
    with the same responsibilities, but without the same benefits...

    Said Joshua Sohn of DLA Piper, “This decision makes clear that the
    City’s use of the LAST both to deny permanent positions to teacher
    applicants and to cut salaries and benefits of in-service teachers was unlawful. The court recognized that the LAST provided no reliable
    information about the qualifications or abilities of the affected
    teachers.”

    End quote.

    Discriminatory and not job-related, leading to loss of pay and benefits
    for doing the same job as before, not some guy getting a big payout for
    failing an exam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Thu Jul 20 07:54:56 2023
    On 7/19/23 9:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 3:40:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 2:17 PM, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 12:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:



    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education is
    presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.

    Yet they employ a teacher who failed the public school competency exam.
    To be fair, I'll cite this paper which the authors claim to be the first
    to examine charter school outcome, with a look at market innovation vs
    strategic behavior, "using two decades of data from the National
    Longitudinal School Database (NLSD), which includes nearly all districts
    in the U.S. from school years 1995 to 2016."

    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED622023.pdf

    "The Combined Effects of Charter Schools on Student Outcomes: A National
    Analysis of School Districts"

    Specifically for urban districts:

    "Prior literature suggests that charter schools have more positive
    effects in urban areas (CREDO 2013, Chabrier, Cohodes, and Oreopoulos
    2016), a finding that we confirm. Harris (2020) hypothesizes that this
    might be because urban districts have lower baseline achievement, which
    makes improvement somewhat easier to achieve. We find some suggestive
    evidence of this, though the estimates are imprecise. Additionally, we
    find that the effects are concentrated in middle schools and high
    schools, not elementary schools."

    An easier read:

    https://www.educationnext.org/bigger-picture-charter-school-results-national-analysis-system-level-effects-test-scores-graduation-rates/


    Whatever!

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school systems.

    Are you knee-jerk opposing anything I post? Did you not follow the link
    or read the quotes?

    One man's "abject failure" is another man's "urban districts have lower baseline achievement."

    To educate you on how wrongly you stepped by dismissing my cite without
    reading it, from the study:

    Abstract: We study the combined effects of charter schools, and their
    various mechanisms, on a national level and across multiple outcomes.
    Using difference-in-differences and fixed effects methods, we find that
    charter entry (above 10 percent market share) increases high school
    graduation rate in geographic districts by about 2-4 percentage points
    and increases test scores by 0.06-0.16 standard deviations. Charter
    effects peak with 5-15 percent charter market share. Also, total effects
    are comprised not only of participant and competitive effects, but also
    the charter-induced closure of low-performing traditional public
    schools. The analysis addresses potential endogeneity of charter school location and timing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Fascist Flea on Thu Jul 20 09:16:55 2023
    On 7/19/23 10:51 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
    The well of irony runneth over.

    Is the Big Dumb Sack actually full of irony? All this time, I thought it was
    dung, either metaphorical or literal.

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school systems. >>>>
    Let's give a shout-out to the gloriously sheltered system that "educated" you.
    Was that Howard County, or Westchester? Or maybe Detroit?

    I was educated

    BZZZZT!

    Incorrect usage - lose 1000 points. The correct term version is...

    I was "educated".

    Whatever training was offered to you did not take. You are as dense and ignorant as if you had been trapped in one of those urban schools you
    love to malign.

    There does seem to be a disconnect between the great-books-reading
    liberal arts college student and the crusty Fox uncle.

    I'm chagrined to realize his odd reaction to me stating that I don't
    think much of polls and don't start threads about them implies that for
    him links is links. Citing a RWNJ site repeating a dark-money sponsored
    push poll or mainstream media or an original source or a scientific
    study are all the same.

    Shimer wiki: All courses are small seminars with no more than twelve
    students, and were based on original sources from a list of about 200
    core texts broadly based on the great books canon. Classroom instruction
    is Socratic discussion.

    He's found a way around that Socratic thing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 20 09:38:21 2023
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:34:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 6:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 12:17:43 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 12:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:





    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education
    is presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.
    Yet they employ a teacher who failed the public school competency
    exam.

    I'm not gonna defend the stupidity of requiring an exam and/or "overqualified" teachers. My sister was a teacher and she complained
    a lot about how stupidly the contracts incentivize teachers
    "continuing education" which ultimately results in their "overqualification" for which they get paid. She got her masters
    degree because it got her a big bump while she was still teaching 2nd graders. She took all their classes and eventually was told she had
    to either become an assistant principal or leave cuz they couldn't
    afford her even though it was their contract that said do this and
    you get this. Anyway, she left for a charter school and loved it
    for one simple reason. The focus was on educating the kids. The
    public schools seemed to think that better educated teachers
    guaranteed better educated kids...but it didn't. It sucked the
    budget up with better paid teachers.
    Even people who love public schools can have problems with school administration.
    Anyway, I'll never accept that the exact same exam given to people is "racist" because of disproportionate outcome of results. That's
    misplaced blame....bigly.
    So you didn't look past the headline? Whites passed at twice the rate of minorities.

    So? Show me it wasn't the same test.
    Show me they illegally gave whites the answers.

    Show me the shitty public schools weren't passing and graduating blacks and hispanics to avoid
    accusations of racism.

    Show me that stupidity isn't why the black and hispanics can't pass the teachers exams.

    But don't try and tell me people who can't pass the exact same exam is due to a racist exam.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 20 12:00:47 2023
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 8:54:58 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 9:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 3:40:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 2:17 PM, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 12:49 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 10:42:25 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote: >>>>>


    Good enough for private and charter schools the where education is >>>>> presumably better than an urban public school!

    No 'presumably' about it.

    Yet they employ a teacher who failed the public school competency exam. >> To be fair, I'll cite this paper which the authors claim to be the first >> to examine charter school outcome, with a look at market innovation vs
    strategic behavior, "using two decades of data from the National
    Longitudinal School Database (NLSD), which includes nearly all districts >> in the U.S. from school years 1995 to 2016."

    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED622023.pdf

    "The Combined Effects of Charter Schools on Student Outcomes: A National >> Analysis of School Districts"

    Specifically for urban districts:

    "Prior literature suggests that charter schools have more positive
    effects in urban areas (CREDO 2013, Chabrier, Cohodes, and Oreopoulos
    2016), a finding that we confirm. Harris (2020) hypothesizes that this
    might be because urban districts have lower baseline achievement, which >> makes improvement somewhat easier to achieve. We find some suggestive
    evidence of this, though the estimates are imprecise. Additionally, we
    find that the effects are concentrated in middle schools and high
    schools, not elementary schools."

    An easier read:

    https://www.educationnext.org/bigger-picture-charter-school-results-national-analysis-system-level-effects-test-scores-graduation-rates/


    Whatever!

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school systems.
    Are you knee-jerk opposing anything I post? Did you not follow the link
    or read the quotes?

    One man's "abject failure" is another man's "urban districts have lower baseline achievement."

    To educate you on how wrongly you stepped by dismissing my cite without reading it, from the study:

    Abstract: We study the combined effects of charter schools, and their various mechanisms, on a national level and across multiple outcomes.
    Using difference-in-differences and fixed effects methods, we find that charter entry (above 10 percent market share) increases high school graduation rate in geographic districts by about 2-4 percentage points
    and increases test scores by 0.06-0.16 standard deviations. Charter
    effects peak with 5-15 percent charter market share. Also, total effects
    are comprised not only of participant and competitive effects, but also
    the charter-induced closure of low-performing traditional public
    schools. The analysis addresses potential endogeneity of charter school location and timing.


    Fudge Factors.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 20 12:02:00 2023
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 10:16:58 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 10:51 PM, Fascist Flea wrote:
    The well of irony runneth over.

    Is the Big Dumb Sack actually full of irony? All this time, I thought it was
    dung, either metaphorical or literal.

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school systems.

    Let's give a shout-out to the gloriously sheltered system that "educated" you.
    Was that Howard County, or Westchester? Or maybe Detroit?

    I was educated

    BZZZZT!

    Incorrect usage - lose 1000 points. The correct term version is...

    I was "educated".

    Whatever training was offered to you did not take. You are as dense and ignorant as if you had been trapped in one of those urban schools you
    love to malign.
    There does seem to be a disconnect between the great-books-reading
    liberal arts college student and the crusty Fox uncle.

    I'm chagrined to realize his odd reaction to me stating that I don't
    think much of polls and don't start threads about them implies that for
    him links is links. Citing a RWNJ site repeating a dark-money sponsored
    push poll or mainstream media or an original source or a scientific
    study are all the same.

    Shimer wiki: All courses are small seminars with no more than twelve students, and were based on original sources from a list of about 200
    core texts broadly based on the great books canon. Classroom instruction
    is Socratic discussion.

    He's found a way around that Socratic thing.

    I can't have a rational discussion with someone who is so closed minded that he won't explore
    a blind link

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Thu Jul 20 14:21:54 2023
    On 7/20/23 2:00 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 8:54:58 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 9:08 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Wednesday, July 19, 2023 at 3:40:06 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:

    To be fair, I'll cite this paper which the authors claim to be
    the first to examine charter school outcome, with a look at
    market innovation vs strategic behavior, "using two decades of
    data from the National Longitudinal School Database (NLSD),
    which includes nearly all districts in the U.S. from school
    years 1995 to 2016."

    https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED622023.pdf

    "The Combined Effects of Charter Schools on Student Outcomes: A
    National Analysis of School Districts"

    An easier read:

    https://www.educationnext.org/bigger-picture-charter-school-results-national-analysis-system-level-effects-test-scores-graduation-rates/

    Whatever!

    You keep forgetting about the abject failure of many urban school
    systems.

    To educate you on how wrongly you stepped by dismissing my cite
    without reading it, from the study:

    Abstract: We study the combined effects of charter schools, and
    their various mechanisms, on a national level and across multiple
    outcomes. Using difference-in-differences and fixed effects
    methods, we find that charter entry (above 10 percent market share)
    increases high school graduation rate in geographic districts by
    about 2-4 percentage points and increases test scores by 0.06-0.16
    standard deviations. Charter effects peak with 5-15 percent charter
    market share. Also, total effects are comprised not only of
    participant and competitive effects, but also the charter-induced
    closure of low-performing traditional public schools. The analysis
    addresses potential endogeneity of charter school location and
    timing.

    Fudge Factors.

    Twenty years of data and high-level statistical fudge factors.

    Why are you nipping at a study that supports your views?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Thu Jul 20 14:22:44 2023
    On 7/20/23 2:02 PM, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 10:16:58 AM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:

    Shimer wiki: All courses are small seminars with no more than twelve
    students, and were based on original sources from a list of about 200
    core texts broadly based on the great books canon. Classroom instruction
    is Socratic discussion.

    He's found a way around that Socratic thing.

    I can't have a rational discussion with someone who is so closed minded that he won't explore
    a blind link

    Rick Astley called. He's mad about goatse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jul 21 12:02:14 2023
    On 7/20/23 11:38 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:34:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 6:04 PM, ScottW wrote:

    Anyway, I'll never accept that the exact same exam given to
    people is "racist" because of disproportionate outcome of
    results. That's misplaced blame....bigly.
    So you didn't look past the headline? Whites passed at twice the
    rate of minorities.

    So? Show me it wasn't the same test. Show me they illegally gave
    whites the answers.

    EEOC: "[An employer] can be found liable under Title VII if it uses a
    facially neutral practice that has the effect of disproportionately
    excluding members of a particular protected group. In such cases, which
    apply the disparate impact theory of discrimination, the individual
    alleging discrimination must prove . . . that the challenged practice
    has a substantial and significant adverse effect on a protected group.
    If the individual can make this demonstration, the employer will be
    liable for discrimination unless it can show that the practice in
    question is job-related and consistent with business necessity. It is
    the employer's burden to make this showing, and a failure to provide any justification for the practice will likely result in a finding of
    liability. Even if an employer can demonstrate that a practice is
    justified, moreover, the individual will be given an opportunity to
    prove that there are other available practices that would also serve the employer's purposes, but with less impact on the protected group."

    Show me the shitty public schools weren't passing and graduating
    blacks and hispanics to avoid accusations of racism.

    NYC parents have the right to sue on those grounds.

    Show me that stupidity isn't why the black and hispanics can't pass
    the teachers exams.

    Hence the second part of the complaint: the test was not job related, as
    people who failed "had already earned master’s degrees, passed content specialty exams, completed other required course work, and received
    nothing but satisfactory evaluations in their many years of employment
    in the city schools."

    Can't be stupid and have a master's degree generally speaking.

    http://www.gulinolitigation.com/faq.php

    "In Gulino v. Board of Education, the Court found that African-American
    and Latino teachers failed the LAST at a significantly higher rate than
    white teachers. The Court then found that the DOE's use of the LAST did
    not predict which applicants would be best able to teach, which means
    that the use of the LAST was not job related or consistent with business necessity. As a result, the Court found the DOE liable for disparate
    impact discrimination under Title VII."

    But don't try and tell me people who can't pass the exact same exam
    is due to a racist exam.

    Doesn't have to be. Disparate outcome is a thing whether you like it or not.

    Looks like the test had a substantial portion based on reading about
    Gertrude Stein's time in Paris. Seems kinda white.

    I guess it balances out all those tests where we had to say why the
    caged bird sings.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 21 10:10:13 2023
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 10:02:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 11:38 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:34:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 6:04 PM, ScottW wrote:

    Anyway, I'll never accept that the exact same exam given to
    people is "racist" because of disproportionate outcome of
    results. That's misplaced blame....bigly.
    So you didn't look past the headline? Whites passed at twice the
    rate of minorities.

    So? Show me it wasn't the same test. Show me they illegally gave
    whites the answers.
    EEOC: "[An employer] can be found liable under Title VII if it uses a facially neutral practice that has the effect of disproportionately excluding members of a particular protected group. In such cases, which apply the disparate impact theory of discrimination, the individual
    alleging discrimination must prove . . . that the challenged practice
    has a substantial and significant adverse effect on a protected group.

    Which is nuts. It just propagates the problem and doesn't fix anything.
    Often makes it worse.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Jul 21 12:32:42 2023
    On 7/21/23 12:10 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 10:02:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/20/23 11:38 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Thursday, July 20, 2023 at 5:34:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 7/19/23 6:04 PM, ScottW wrote:

    Anyway, I'll never accept that the exact same exam given to
    people is "racist" because of disproportionate outcome of
    results. That's misplaced blame....bigly.
    So you didn't look past the headline? Whites passed at twice the
    rate of minorities.

    So? Show me it wasn't the same test. Show me they illegally gave
    whites the answers.
    EEOC: "[An employer] can be found liable under Title VII if it uses a
    facially neutral practice that has the effect of disproportionately
    excluding members of a particular protected group. In such cases, which
    apply the disparate impact theory of discrimination, the individual
    alleging discrimination must prove . . . that the challenged practice
    has a substantial and significant adverse effect on a protected group.

    Which is nuts. It just propagates the problem and doesn't fix anything. Often makes it worse.

    If they aren't qualified, why was the NYC BOE willing to keep them in
    their jobs, just with reduced pay and benefits?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 21 14:20:47 2023
    On Friday, July 21, 2023 at 1:02:17 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
    Looks like the test had a substantial portion based on reading about
    Gertrude Stein's time in Paris. Seems kinda white.



    I'm your typical garden variety MAGA Trump loving white supremacist and
    i have absolutely no idea what she did in Paris.
    But on the test, I would make a logical guess and say that she ate a lot of croissants.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)