A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts.
On 7/25/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts.The Republican party who are Hannity's only audience? Sure.
Democrats? *You* might think this is nuts;
https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1684019541419126785
[Ukraine]
"Absolutely nothing this clown said is remotely correct. The dates,
names, places, context, everything was wrong. To anyone who understands
this topic he sounds like a complete ignoramus."
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 9:15:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts. >> The Republican party who are Hannity's only audience? Sure.
He managed to put together a townhall that was supportive of Jr.
Democrats? *You* might think this is nuts;
https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1684019541419126785
[Ukraine]
"Absolutely nothing this clown said is remotely correct. The dates,
names, places, context, everything was wrong. To anyone who understands
this topic he sounds like a complete ignoramus."
Is this guy considered "credible"? I wonder who would be so silly.
On 7/25/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts.The Republican party who are Hannity's only audience? Sure.
Democrats? *You* might think this is nuts;
https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1684019541419126785
[Ukraine]
"Absolutely nothing this clown said is remotely correct. The dates,
names, places, context, everything was wrong. To anyone who understands
this topic he sounds like a complete ignoramus."
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 2:30:30 PM UTC-4, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/26/23 12:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 9:15:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:So?
On 7/25/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts.The Republican party who are Hannity's only audience? Sure.
He managed to put together a townhall that was supportive of Jr.
Yes, he's an actual expert who served as the NSC Director for EuropeanDemocrats? *You* might think this is nuts;
https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1684019541419126785
[Ukraine]
"Absolutely nothing this clown said is remotely correct. The dates,
names, places, context, everything was wrong. To anyone who understands >>>> this topic he sounds like a complete ignoramus."
Is this guy considered "credible"? I wonder who would be so silly.
Affairs. That Trumpists resent his truth-telling doesn't mean he doesn't
know what he's talking about.
I'll give Vindman his due. "At leased" he is one expert who didn't
steal ladies' luggage.
On 7/26/23 12:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 9:15:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts.The Republican party who are Hannity's only audience? Sure.
He managed to put together a townhall that was supportive of Jr.So?
Democrats? *You* might think this is nuts;
https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1684019541419126785
[Ukraine]
"Absolutely nothing this clown said is remotely correct. The dates,
names, places, context, everything was wrong. To anyone who understands >> this topic he sounds like a complete ignoramus."
Is this guy considered "credible"? I wonder who would be so silly.Yes, he's an actual expert who served as the NSC Director for European Affairs. That Trumpists resent his truth-telling doesn't mean he doesn't know what he's talking about.
On 7/26/23 12:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 9:15:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/25/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts.The Republican party who are Hannity's only audience? Sure.
He managed to put together a townhall that was supportive of Jr.So?
Democrats? *You* might think this is nuts;
https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1684019541419126785
[Ukraine]
"Absolutely nothing this clown said is remotely correct. The dates,
names, places, context, everything was wrong. To anyone who understands >> this topic he sounds like a complete ignoramus."
Is this guy considered "credible"? I wonder who would be so silly.Yes, he's an actual expert who served as the NSC Director for European Affairs. That Trumpists resent his truth-telling doesn't mean he doesn't know what he's talking about.
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 11:30:30 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/26/23 12:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 9:15:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:So?
On 7/25/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts.The Republican party who are Hannity's only audience? Sure.
He managed to put together a townhall that was supportive of Jr.
Yes, he's an actual expert who served as the NSC Director for EuropeanDemocrats? *You* might think this is nuts;
https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1684019541419126785
[Ukraine]
"Absolutely nothing this clown said is remotely correct. The dates,
names, places, context, everything was wrong. To anyone who understands >>>> this topic he sounds like a complete ignoramus."
Is this guy considered "credible"? I wonder who would be so silly.
Affairs. That Trumpists resent his truth-telling doesn't mean he doesn't
know what he's talking about.
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdf
On 7/26/23 5:50 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 11:30:30 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/26/23 12:19 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Wednesday, July 26, 2023 at 9:15:17 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:So?
On 7/25/23 8:48 PM, ScottW wrote:
A full hour conversation. I bet that's driving the party faithful....nuts.The Republican party who are Hannity's only audience? Sure.
He managed to put together a townhall that was supportive of Jr.
Yes, he's an actual expert who served as the NSC Director for EuropeanDemocrats? *You* might think this is nuts;
https://twitter.com/AVindman/status/1684019541419126785
[Ukraine]
"Absolutely nothing this clown said is remotely correct. The dates, >>>> names, places, context, everything was wrong. To anyone who understands >>>> this topic he sounds like a complete ignoramus."
Is this guy considered "credible"? I wonder who would be so silly.
Affairs. That Trumpists resent his truth-telling doesn't mean he doesn't >> know what he's talking about.
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdfWhy is a Byron York opinion hit piece at a congress.gov url?
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 6:59:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdfWhy is a Byron York opinion hit piece at a congress.gov url?
Congress puts shit in the record all the time.
Haven't you ever watched a committee hearing? During that whistleblower testimony dems were throwing
all kinds of media BS into the record.
FWIW, I tend to agree that RFK Jr. is way off on Ukraine. But Vindman isn't the guy to lean on.
Try this.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2023/7/26/2183443/-Robert-Kennedy-Jr-is-wrong-on-every-single-point-about-Ukraine
Sumner's politics are whacked but he does a good job of shelving them when doing his updates on the war.
This isn't an update BTW.
On 7/27/23 10:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 6:59:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdfWhy is a Byron York opinion hit piece at a congress.gov url?
Congress puts shit in the record all the time.Using the congress url implies an original work, testimony or report,
not the equivalent of a repost of a right-wing media piece.
Haven't you ever watched a committee hearing? During that whistleblower testimony dems were throwingI'm not linking it deceptively.
all kinds of media BS into the record.
FWIW, I tend to agree that RFK Jr. is way off on Ukraine. But Vindman isn't the guy to lean on.Really? Because you didn't like that he told the truth about Trump?
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:15:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/27/23 10:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 6:59:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Using the congress url implies an original work, testimony or report,
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdfWhy is a Byron York opinion hit piece at a congress.gov url?
Congress puts shit in the record all the time.
Stop making shit up based on your ignorance of what congress does on a daily basis.
I move to put blah blah into the record....So ordered. I see it all the time.
not the equivalent of a repost of a right-wing media piece.
Haven't you ever watched a committee hearing? During that whistleblower testimony dems were throwingI'm not linking it deceptively.
all kinds of media BS into the record.
WTF? Are you whining because you saw something you don't want your crying eyes to see?
I post the links of the info where I find 'em.
What do you want? A tiny URL so you wont think Congress doesn't put crap into the public record?
FWIW, I tend to agree that RFK Jr. is way off on Ukraine. But Vindman isn't the guy to lean on.Really? Because you didn't like that he told the truth about Trump?
LoL. Give it a rest.
Y'all are the indefatigable reply guys.
On 7/28/23 10:58 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:15:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/27/23 10:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 6:59:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Using the congress url implies an original work, testimony or report,
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdfWhy is a Byron York opinion hit piece at a congress.gov url?
Congress puts shit in the record all the time.
Stop making shit up based on your ignorance of what congress does on a daily basis.Congress isn't a reposting site like your right-wing favorites.
I move to put blah blah into the record....So ordered. I see it all the time.Original sources, please.
not the equivalent of a repost of a right-wing media piece.
Haven't you ever watched a committee hearing? During that whistleblower testimony dems were throwingI'm not linking it deceptively.
all kinds of media BS into the record.
WTF? Are you whining because you saw something you don't want your crying eyes to see?No, I'm pointing out your posting implied an authority it doesn't have.
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:30:23 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 10:58 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:15:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/27/23 10:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 6:59:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109
wrote:
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdf
Why is a Byron York opinion hit piece at a congress.gov url?
Congress isn't a reposting site like your right-wing favorites.Congress puts shit in the record all the time.Using the congress url implies an original work, testimony or
report,
Stop making shit up based on your ignorance of what congress
does on a daily basis.
Your lying eyes deceived and now it's denial time.
I move to put blah blah into the record....So ordered. I see itOriginal sources, please.
all the time.
No more wiki shit from you.
And implying the morons of our beloved media originate anything is to
admit their lying scumbags because lies are their only originally
sourced product. Even then, it's mostly regurgitation.
No, I'm pointing out your posting implied an authority it doesn'tnot the equivalent of a repost of a right-wing media piece.
Haven't you ever watched a committee hearing? During thatI'm not linking it deceptively.
whistleblower testimony dems were throwing all kinds of
media BS into the record.
WTF? Are you whining because you saw something you don't want
your crying eyes to see?
have.
You think Congress is an authority of truth? ROTFLMAO at your
ignorance.
On 7/28/23 4:35 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:30:23 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 10:58 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:15:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/27/23 10:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 6:59:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109
wrote:
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdf
Why is a Byron York opinion hit piece at a congress.gov url?
Congress isn't a reposting site like your right-wing favorites.Congress puts shit in the record all the time.Using the congress url implies an original work, testimony or
report,
Stop making shit up based on your ignorance of what congress
does on a daily basis.
Your lying eyes deceived and now it's denial time.Much as you enjoying saying that, it doesn't mean anything.
If you really want to know, I clicked thru, saw the author, read a few
lines and thought, why is this newspaper piece here?
I move to put blah blah into the record....So ordered. I see itOriginal sources, please.
all the time.
No more wiki shit from you.Wiki cites.
On Saturday, July 29, 2023 at 6:44:32 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/28/23 4:35 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 10:30:23 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Much as you enjoying saying that, it doesn't mean anything.
On 7/28/23 10:58 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, July 28, 2023 at 5:15:26 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 7/27/23 10:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Thursday, July 27, 2023 at 6:59:44 AM UTC-7, mINE109
wrote:
https://www.congress.gov/116/meeting/house/110281/documents/HHRG-116-JU00-20191204-SD016.pdf
Why is a Byron York opinion hit piece at a congress.gov url?
Congress isn't a reposting site like your right-wing favorites.Congress puts shit in the record all the time.Using the congress url implies an original work, testimony or
report,
Stop making shit up based on your ignorance of what congress
does on a daily basis.
Your lying eyes deceived and now it's denial time.
Yeah it does. And you'll never be a better person by ignoring it.
If you really want to know, I clicked thru, saw the author, read a few
lines and thought, why is this newspaper piece here?
Because someone in congress put it there.
Wiki cites.I move to put blah blah into the record....So ordered. I see itOriginal sources, please.
all the time.
No more wiki shit from you.
As if this piece source wasn't cited. GMAFB.
You're all over the map and I've decided this lunacy is really just lame obfuscation.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 161:06:05 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,056 |
| Messages: | 6,416,496 |