Super Shitty and Sackdork have established their fave evasion modes
in today's version of the "debating trade". Stupey Sacky retreats
into making lame "funnies" when cornered, e.g.:
I need to start saving this stuff for my thesis and phd.
You'll find IKYABWAI is not a recognized thesis defense.
I searched. Nobody has ever done a thesis on iKYABWAIs
The academic record is thin. The potential is great.
Somebody in Academia needs to get on this right now.
SackSchmuck deploys a very thin layer of 'borgish humor;
it's practically undetectable. The upshot here is the Sacktard
painted themself into a corner and tries to laugh it off.
As far as Shitty Witlessdork, they have claimed repeatedly that
humans should not interpret any of their Usenet squats as
accurate portrayals of their, um, "thoughts". Rather, Shitty
lectures us, we have absolutely no idea what their torrents of
thought fragments and fractured sentences actually "mean".
Educing meaning from those verbal messes as one would
with a functioning human being is OUR mistake, Shitty intones.
The "truth" of their blather, like the "truth" of the ineffable
conspiracy theories that drive MAGA-turds, is at once
unapprehensible and ineluctable.
There. I've established some ground rules for both of our Shmoo-tards
that comport with their established "debating trade" patterns. Henceforth,
we can agree that nothing they post should carry any human gravitas
or verisimilitude whatsoever.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)