Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware
who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the
president's son, as the special counsel.
Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw
up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over
his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of limitations.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware
who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.
Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw
up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over
his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of limitations.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write a report
so people like you can't take his previous inability to comment as
evidence of anything.
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in DelawareBeing special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write a report
who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the
president's son, as the special counsel.
Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw
up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over
his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of
limitations.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
so people like you can't take his previous inability to comment as
evidence of anything.
Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need SC authority.
Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
What's your deadline for that report?
i'll bet 2029 is fine with you.
On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in DelawareBeing special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write a report >> so people like you can't take his previous inability to comment as
who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the
president's son, as the special counsel.
Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw >>> up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over
his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of
limitations.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
evidence of anything.
Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need SC authority.Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing decisions
Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
while a prosecutor must "refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
What's your deadline for that report?I don't set the deadlines.
i'll bet 2029 is fine with you.
If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his
staff wouldn't have messed up the plea agreement.
Do you want this to
stop or get stretched out?
Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor you
had previously demanded be appointed.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing
On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney inBeing special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write
Delaware who has been probing the financial and business
dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.
Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing
but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself
repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations
disappear via statute of limitations.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
a report so people like you can't take his previous inability
to comment as evidence of anything.
Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need
SC authority. Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
decisions while a prosecutor must "refrain from making
extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of
heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
What's your deadline for that report? i'll bet 2029 is fine withI don't set the deadlines.
you.
Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.
If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't have
messed up the plea agreement.
LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the
immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing
hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess up.
Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?
Define stop.
Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor
you had previously demanded be appointed.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/
Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan.
You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already
f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?
This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in front
of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the slew of
letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.
Only a completely biased partisan can ignore that aspect.
On 8/11/23 5:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing
On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney inBeing special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write
Delaware who has been probing the financial and business
dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.
Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing
but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself
repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations
disappear via statute of limitations.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
a report so people like you can't take his previous inability
to comment as evidence of anything.
Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need
SC authority. Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
decisions while a prosecutor must "refrain from making
extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of
heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
What's your deadline for that report? i'll bet 2029 is fine withI don't set the deadlines.
you.
Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.
If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't have
messed up the plea agreement.
LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put theNo way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed to in court.
immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing
hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess up.
Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?
Define stop.
Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor
you had previously demanded be appointed.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/
Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan.Well, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point.
You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already
f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?
Of course,
Hunter doesn't have a criminal history, only allegations.
This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in frontWhy did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they knew it would keep him from testifying for Comer?
of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 5:09:03 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
No way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed toIf Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't
have messed up the plea agreement.
LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the
immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing
hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess
up.
in court.
Only between prosecution and defense. Judge is not involved in
deferment agreements.
Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?
Define stop.
Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special
prosecutor you had previously demanded be appointed.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/
Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan >>> You think Weiss fits that description especially since he'sWell, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point.
already f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?
Yeah, Trump was dumb and naive to accept the recommendation of the
dem state senators. A stupid custom of rampant power abuse and
corruption that should never be considered again.
This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify inWhy did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they
front of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the
slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the
senate.
knew it would keep him from testifying for Comer?
A little outdated and precedes the bogus settlement and the knowledge
that he let SoL elapse on years of criminality.
So now Weiss is under inquiry and he requests the only invisibility
cloak he knows of....the immunity of the ongoing investigator.
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 5:09:03 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/11/23 5:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing
On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney inBeing special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write
Delaware who has been probing the financial and business
dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.
Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing
but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself
repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations
disappear via statute of limitations.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
a report so people like you can't take his previous inability
to comment as evidence of anything.
Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need
SC authority. Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
decisions while a prosecutor must "refrain from making
extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of
heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
What's your deadline for that report? i'll bet 2029 is fine withI don't set the deadlines.
you.
Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.
If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't have
messed up the plea agreement.
Only between prosecution and defense.LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put theNo way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed to in court.
immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing
hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess up.
Judge is not involved in deferment agreements.
Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?
Define stop.
Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor
you had previously demanded be appointed.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/
Yeah, Trump was dumb and naive to accept the recommendation of the dem state senators.Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan.Well, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point.
You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already
f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?
A stupid custom of rampant power abuse and corruption that should never be considered again.
Of course,A little outdated and precedes the bogus settlement and the knowledge that he let
Hunter doesn't have a criminal history, only allegations.
This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in frontWhy did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they knew it would keep him from testifying for Comer?
of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.
SoL elapse on years of criminality.
So now Weiss is under inquiry and he requests the only invisibility cloak he knows of....the immunity of the ongoing investigator.
ScottW
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 2:04:26 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 5:09:03 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/11/23 5:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>> On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing
Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney inBeing special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write
Delaware who has been probing the financial and business
dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.
Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing
but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself
repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations
disappear via statute of limitations.
They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
a report so people like you can't take his previous inability
to comment as evidence of anything.
Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need >>> SC authority. Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
decisions while a prosecutor must "refrain from making
extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of
heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
What's your deadline for that report? i'll bet 2029 is fine withI don't set the deadlines.
you.
Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.
If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't have
messed up the plea agreement.
Only between prosecution and defense.LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess up.No way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed to in court.
Judge is not involved in deferment agreements.
Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?
Define stop.
Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor >> you had previously demanded be appointed.
https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/
Yeah, Trump was dumb and naive to accept the recommendation of the dem state senators.Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan. You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?Well, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point.
A stupid custom of rampant power abuse and corruption that should never be considered again.
Of course,A little outdated and precedes the bogus settlement and the knowledge that he let
Hunter doesn't have a criminal history, only allegations.
This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in frontWhy did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they knew it would keep him from testifying for Comer?
of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.
SoL elapse on years of criminality.
So now Weiss is under inquiry and he requests the only invisibility cloak he knows of....the immunity of the ongoing investigator.
ScottWKeep your eye on the prize.
Hunter and Joe.
Nobody elected the deep state.
And they say NPD is nearly incurable. How about hyperdelusionosis?
Nobody elected the deep state.
Also, no one has identified them. Want to guess why?
Keep your eye on the prize.
Hunter and Joe.
We deserve the gov't we elect.
Nobody elected the deep state.
And they say NPD is nearly incurable. How about hyperdelusionosis?
Nobody elected the deep state.
Also, no one has identified them. Want to guess why?Here's a nice long list to start with.
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000
You MAGA peabrains are so stubbornly stupid. The "deep state" is the
dark money and the outright bribery, almost all of which originates from fatcat republigoon donors and criminals. (A small portion goes to Democrats and Dinos.) Do you think they pay off your horrible party's operatives because of
ideology? Do you think the tax laws are so porous because some faceless bureaucrats, toiling away in cubicles and file rooms, made it so? Do you think
Big Pharma, Big Oil, Big Tech, and all the rest are under the control of your
imaginary "deep state" inside the government?
Wake the fuck up, Super Stupid Shithead. There is no "deep state" in a political sense, or ideological, or anything other than need and greed.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 493 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 14:19:46 |
Calls: | 9,711 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,740 |
Messages: | 6,181,698 |