• Garland creates ongoing investigation to block Congress

    From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 11 09:57:21 2023
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 11 10:32:24 2023
    duh-Scottie recharges their 'borgish paranoia engine.
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.
    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.

    Another "they" perpetrating another "deep state" conspiracy. It never ends.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Aug 11 12:34:55 2023
    On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware
    who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the
    president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw
    up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over
    his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.

    Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write a report
    so people like you can't take his previous inability to comment as
    evidence of anything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 11 11:16:16 2023
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware
    who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw
    up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over
    his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
    Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write a report
    so people like you can't take his previous inability to comment as
    evidence of anything.

    Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need SC authority.
    Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.

    What's your deadline for that report?
    i'll bet 2029 is fine with you.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Aug 11 14:34:16 2023
    On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware
    who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the
    president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw
    up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over
    his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of
    limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
    Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write a report
    so people like you can't take his previous inability to comment as
    evidence of anything.

    Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need SC authority.
    Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.

    Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing decisions
    while a prosecutor must "refrain from making extrajudicial comments that
    have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused..."

    What's your deadline for that report?
    i'll bet 2029 is fine with you.

    I don't set the deadlines. If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his
    staff wouldn't have messed up the plea agreement. Do you want this to
    stop or get stretched out?

    Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor you
    had previously demanded be appointed.

    https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Fri Aug 11 15:41:13 2023
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in Delaware
    who has been probing the financial and business dealings of the
    president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing but screw >>> up the only charges be brought, contradict himself repeatedly over
    his own authority and let many violations disappear via statute of
    limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
    Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write a report >> so people like you can't take his previous inability to comment as
    evidence of anything.

    Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need SC authority.
    Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
    Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing decisions
    while a prosecutor must "refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
    What's your deadline for that report?
    i'll bet 2029 is fine with you.
    I don't set the deadlines.

    Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.

    If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his
    staff wouldn't have messed up the plea agreement.

    LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before
    the hearing hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them.
    What a mess up.

    Do you want this to
    stop or get stretched out?

    Define stop.


    Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor you
    had previously demanded be appointed.

    https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/

    Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan.
    You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?

    This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in front of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer
    the slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.

    Only a completely biased partisan can ignore that aspect.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Fri Aug 11 19:09:00 2023
    On 8/11/23 5:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in
    Delaware who has been probing the financial and business
    dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing
    but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself
    repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations
    disappear via statute of limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
    Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write
    a report so people like you can't take his previous inability
    to comment as evidence of anything.

    Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need
    SC authority. Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
    Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing
    decisions while a prosecutor must "refrain from making
    extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of
    heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
    What's your deadline for that report? i'll bet 2029 is fine with
    you.
    I don't set the deadlines.

    Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.

    If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't have
    messed up the plea agreement.

    LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the
    immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing
    hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess up.

    No way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed to in court.

    Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?

    Define stop.
    Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor
    you had previously demanded be appointed.

    https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/

    Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan.
    You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already
    f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?

    Well, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point. Of course,
    Hunter doesn't have a criminal history, only allegations.

    This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in front
    of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the slew of
    letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.

    Why did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they knew it
    would keep him from testifying for Comer?

    https://www.cornyn.senate.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Hunter-Biden-Special-Counsel-Letter-FINAL-2.pdf

    "Dear Attorney General Garland:

    We the undersigned write to request that United States Attorney David C.
    Weiss be extended special counsel protections and authorities to conduct
    the Hunter Eiden investigation."

    Signed,

    Thirty-two Republican Senators

    Only a completely biased partisan can ignore that aspect.

    Yes, he completely did the Republican's bidding.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 12 11:04:22 2023
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 5:09:03 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 5:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in
    Delaware who has been probing the financial and business
    dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing
    but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself
    repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations
    disappear via statute of limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
    Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write
    a report so people like you can't take his previous inability
    to comment as evidence of anything.

    Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need
    SC authority. Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
    Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing
    decisions while a prosecutor must "refrain from making
    extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of
    heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
    What's your deadline for that report? i'll bet 2029 is fine with
    you.
    I don't set the deadlines.

    Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.

    If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't have
    messed up the plea agreement.

    LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the
    immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing
    hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess up.
    No way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed to in court.

    Only between prosecution and defense.
    Judge is not involved in deferment agreements.

    Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?

    Define stop.
    Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor
    you had previously demanded be appointed.

    https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/

    Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan.
    You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already
    f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?
    Well, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point.

    Yeah, Trump was dumb and naive to accept the recommendation of the dem state senators.
    A stupid custom of rampant power abuse and corruption that should never be considered again.



    Of course,
    Hunter doesn't have a criminal history, only allegations.
    This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in front
    of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.
    Why did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they knew it would keep him from testifying for Comer?

    A little outdated and precedes the bogus settlement and the knowledge that he let
    SoL elapse on years of criminality.

    So now Weiss is under inquiry and he requests the only invisibility cloak he knows of....the immunity of the ongoing investigator.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Aug 12 13:47:08 2023
    On 8/12/23 1:04 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 5:09:03 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:

    If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't
    have messed up the plea agreement.

    LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the
    immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing
    hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess
    up.
    No way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed to
    in court.

    Only between prosecution and defense. Judge is not involved in
    deferment agreements.

    Ken White: "A federal guilty plea is an involved process; it’s routine
    for it to last anywhere from fifteen minutes (very fast) to an hour
    (slow). It involves a searching inquiry by the judge into whether the
    defendant understands the terms of the deal, the rights they are giving
    up, the sentence and sentencing process they are facing, the facts
    supporting the plea, and the voluntariness of the deal...

    ...the diversion agreement... does have the non-prosecution agreement...
    So the agreement says that the government won’t prosecute Hunter Biden
    for any federal crimes “encompassed” by the statements of fact attached
    to the plea agreement (about the tax crimes) or the diversion agreement
    (about the gun crime). But what does “encompassed by” mean?"

    There's speculation of a prosecution trap to get around their botched investigation on other charges.

    Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?

    Define stop.
    Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special
    prosecutor you had previously demanded be appointed.

    https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/

    Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan >>> You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's
    already f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?
    Well, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point.

    Yeah, Trump was dumb and naive to accept the recommendation of the
    dem state senators. A stupid custom of rampant power abuse and
    corruption that should never be considered again.

    Weiss was not asked to resign by Biden upon taking office because he was investigating Hunter.

    Weiss was good enough for Barr when the investigation began in 2019.

    No, Trump will never appoint an AG again.

    This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in
    front of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the
    slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the
    senate.
    Why did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they
    knew it would keep him from testifying for Comer?

    A little outdated and precedes the bogus settlement and the knowledge
    that he let SoL elapse on years of criminality.

    Last September.

    So now Weiss is under inquiry and he requests the only invisibility
    cloak he knows of....the immunity of the ongoing investigator.

    Was he able to comment on ongoing investigations as a regular prosecutor?

    I agree that Weiss has done a terrible job handling the investigation
    and prosecution.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to ScottW on Sat Aug 12 12:28:52 2023
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 2:04:26 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 5:09:03 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 5:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in
    Delaware who has been probing the financial and business
    dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing
    but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself
    repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations
    disappear via statute of limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
    Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write
    a report so people like you can't take his previous inability
    to comment as evidence of anything.

    Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need
    SC authority. Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
    Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing
    decisions while a prosecutor must "refrain from making
    extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of
    heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
    What's your deadline for that report? i'll bet 2029 is fine with
    you.
    I don't set the deadlines.

    Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.

    If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't have
    messed up the plea agreement.

    LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the
    immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing
    hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess up.
    No way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed to in court.
    Only between prosecution and defense.
    Judge is not involved in deferment agreements.
    Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?

    Define stop.
    Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor
    you had previously demanded be appointed.

    https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/

    Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan.
    You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already
    f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?
    Well, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point.
    Yeah, Trump was dumb and naive to accept the recommendation of the dem state senators.
    A stupid custom of rampant power abuse and corruption that should never be considered again.
    Of course,
    Hunter doesn't have a criminal history, only allegations.
    This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in front
    of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.
    Why did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they knew it would keep him from testifying for Comer?
    A little outdated and precedes the bogus settlement and the knowledge that he let
    SoL elapse on years of criminality.

    So now Weiss is under inquiry and he requests the only invisibility cloak he knows of....the immunity of the ongoing investigator.

    ScottW

    Keep your eye on the prize.
    Hunter and Joe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Art Sackman on Sat Aug 12 16:34:26 2023
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 12:28:54 PM UTC-7, Art Sackman wrote:
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 2:04:26 PM UTC-4, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 5:09:03 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 5:41 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 12:34:21 PM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote:
    On 8/11/23 1:16 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Friday, August 11, 2023 at 10:34:58 AM UTC-7, mINE109 wrote: >>>> On 8/11/23 11:57 AM, ScottW wrote:
    Garland said he is naming David Weiss, the U.S. attorney in
    Delaware who has been probing the financial and business
    dealings of the president's son, as the special counsel.

    Weiss has been "probing" already for years and done nothing
    but screw up the only charges be brought, contradict himself
    repeatedly over his own authority and let many violations
    disappear via statute of limitations.

    They're doing this to bury it until after the election.
    Being special counsel will give Weiss the opportunity to write
    a report so people like you can't take his previous inability
    to comment as evidence of anything.

    Funny, he commented plenty and specifically saying he didn't need >>> SC authority. Now he does as congress has asked him to appear.
    Nonetheless, a special counsel can write a report detailing
    decisions while a prosecutor must "refrain from making
    extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of
    heightening public condemnation of the accused..."
    What's your deadline for that report? i'll bet 2029 is fine with
    you.
    I don't set the deadlines.

    Yeah...you're just a spectator....who can't see.

    If Weiss had wanted all this to go away, his staff wouldn't have
    messed up the plea agreement.

    LoL....Yeah...that's what happened. They messed up and put the immunity in docs sent to the judge mere hours before the hearing hoping the judge wouldn't have time to review them. What a mess up.
    No way the judge would miss them there. They have to be agreed to in court.
    Only between prosecution and defense.
    Judge is not involved in deferment agreements.
    Do you want this to stop or get stretched out?

    Define stop.
    Congrats for not condemning the appointment of a special prosecutor >> you had previously demanded be appointed.

    https://nypost.com/2023/06/13/senate-republicans-demand-special-counsel-to-investigate-biden-bribery-claim/

    Which are typically and above reproach outside of gov't bipartisan. You think Weiss fits that description especially since he's already f'd up a large part of Hunter's criminal history?
    Well, he was a Trump appointee, so you may have a point.
    Yeah, Trump was dumb and naive to accept the recommendation of the dem state senators.
    A stupid custom of rampant power abuse and corruption that should never be considered again.
    Of course,
    Hunter doesn't have a criminal history, only allegations.
    This is a cover to keep Weiss from being forced to testify in front
    of congressional committees or the DoJ having to answer the slew of letters of inquiry from legislators in congress and the senate.
    Why did the Senate Republicans demand a special counsel if they knew it would keep him from testifying for Comer?
    A little outdated and precedes the bogus settlement and the knowledge that he let
    SoL elapse on years of criminality.

    So now Weiss is under inquiry and he requests the only invisibility cloak he knows of....the immunity of the ongoing investigator.

    ScottW
    Keep your eye on the prize.
    Hunter and Joe.

    We deserve the gov't we elect.
    Nobody elected the deep state.

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 12 16:57:31 2023
    And they say NPD is nearly incurable. How about hyperdelusionosis?

    Nobody elected the deep state.

    Also, no one has identified them. Want to guess why?

    You MAGA peabrains are so stubbornly stupid. The "deep state" is the
    dark money and the outright bribery, almost all of which originates from
    fatcat republigoon donors and criminals. (A small portion goes to Democrats
    and Dinos.) Do you think they pay off your horrible party's operatives because of
    ideology? Do you think the tax laws are so porous because some faceless bureaucrats, toiling away in cubicles and file rooms, made it so? Do you think Big Pharma, Big Oil, Big Tech, and all the rest are under the control of your imaginary "deep state" inside the government?

    Wake the fuck up, Super Stupid Shithead. There is no "deep state" in a political sense, or ideological, or anything other than need and greed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From ScottW@21:1/5 to Fascist Flea on Sat Aug 12 17:09:06 2023
    On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 4:57:33 PM UTC-7, Fascist Flea wrote:
    And they say NPD is nearly incurable. How about hyperdelusionosis?

    Nobody elected the deep state.

    Also, no one has identified them. Want to guess why?

    Here's a nice long list to start with.

    https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000

    ScottW

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Art Sackman@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 12 18:54:13 2023
    Keep your eye on the prize.
    Hunter and Joe.

    We deserve the gov't we elect.
    Nobody elected the deep state.


    The politicians we elected appointed them and empowered them.
    So, if you defeat Biden with a solid Republican,
    Weiss, Garland, and Wray will be gone.

    A congressional inquiry into Weiss won't do that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fascist Flea@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 12 19:06:16 2023
    The Supremely Stupid Stubborn Shithead digs in his paws.

    And they say NPD is nearly incurable. How about hyperdelusionosis?

    Nobody elected the deep state.

    Also, no one has identified them. Want to guess why?
    Here's a nice long list to start with.

    https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000175-4393-d7aa-af77-579f9b330000

    Except you fell asleep during the main part of the lecture.

    You MAGA peabrains are so stubbornly stupid. The "deep state" is the
    dark money and the outright bribery, almost all of which originates from fatcat republigoon donors and criminals. (A small portion goes to Democrats and Dinos.) Do you think they pay off your horrible party's operatives because of
    ideology? Do you think the tax laws are so porous because some faceless bureaucrats, toiling away in cubicles and file rooms, made it so? Do you think
    Big Pharma, Big Oil, Big Tech, and all the rest are under the control of your
    imaginary "deep state" inside the government?

    Wake the fuck up, Super Stupid Shithead. There is no "deep state" in a political sense, or ideological, or anything other than need and greed.

    In the feebleness of your MAGA fog, all you can do, apparently, is regurgitate last year's pablum of disinformation and MAGA-ganda.

    There is no "deep state" within the government. It's a Dumpster myth.
    Your delusion arises from the anti-reality garbage you consume and
    your inability to put two thoughts together.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)