On 25/08/2023 3:49 am, ScottW wrote:
"This is a common avenue taken by 'climate sceptics' in order to avoid peer review by real experts in the field."
**There are no 'climate sceptics'.
There are scientists and deniers. There is nothing in between. Climate
change is real and it is being caused by human emission of GHGs. We know
this as a fact. Arrhenius first proposed the theory and not once in the
past 120+ years has any successful challenge to the Arrhenius theory
been presented. NOT ONCE. In recent years, modern techniques have merely
shown that Arrhenius was right.
So you must survive the "real expert" gauntlet.
Who decides who is "real"?
**Not religious fruitcakes, nor politicians, nor deniers and
anti-vaxxers. Proper, qualified scientists who study the particular
topic decide.
Covid and the Fauci clearly showed experts can be easily bought.
**Really? Sounds like more ignorant bullshit to me.
In this case the justification for withdrawal of the paper is never
really made.
**Wrong:
"Several climate scientists contacted by AFP said the study manipulated
data, cherry picked facts and ignored others that would contradict their assertions, prompting the publisher to launch an internal review."
So, the paper was withdrawn, because the 'science' presented was poor
quality.
It's assertions but no facts.
**Wrong. It is the LACK of facts that caused the withdrawal of the
paper. It's how the peer-review process works.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/top-science-publisher-withdraws-flawed-climate-study/ar-AA1fIFb1?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531&cvid=487e0b8bb09e415f8003e8745a020d54&ei=9
Maybe it is flawed....or maybe the real experts are there to make sure the truth isn't really well known. I give it 50-50 either way.
**You'd give it 50:50 because you are an idiot.
--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)