On 9/14/23 9:45 AM, ScottW wrote:
From the author who Glen Greenwald says made a career of being the
media mouthpiece for the CIA. "If Ignatius lips are moving, the CIA
is talking".
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/09/12/biden-trump-election-step-aside/
Kind of interesting that the CIA might be sending Joe a message.
"But her emails."
https://twitter.com/cwebbonline/status/1701959029143269826
[Christopher Webb]
"Of course David Ignatius is entitled to share his opinion — and I’m entitled to share mine. Ignatius’ latest column is clickbait and counterproductive — he asks a lot of leading questions and piles on but
has no answers. I’ll summarize so you don’t have to waste your time…
Ignatius details how the Biden Harris team has done an outstanding job,
but shouldn’t run in 2024 because Biden’s too old and has no idea who should run in his place. Alternatively, if he runs, Kamala Harris
shouldn’t be on the ticket this time because she hasn’t quite caught on with the American public, but he has no idea why. 🤔
So we should give up on our winning team because the President, who has
done an outstanding job, is 3 years older than Trump — for some unknown replacement ticket when the GOP has a field that has several months
head-start over this unknown ticket."
Previous Ignatius in WaPo (2017):
"Finally, what’s the chance that Russian intelligence has gamed its
covert action more subtly than we realize? Applying a
counter-intelligence lens, it’s worth asking whether the Russians hoped
to be discovered, and whether Russian operatives fed the former MI6
officer’s controversial dossier deliberately, to sow further chaos."
He does sound connected, but, that said, I don't see a CIA influence on
this one. That bizarre story about bribing lab-leak analysts, otoh...
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)