• Re: Can you explain the cops reaction in this video?

    From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Tue Jan 23 09:52:20 2024
    On 1/22/24 11:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1748117563228483869

    It seems likely that government officials were involved in planting
    pipe bombs in Washington, DC three years ago, as part of an effort to
    keep Donald Trump from running for president again. Darren Beattie
    has details.

    Seems unlikely. Are these different pipe bombs than the ones initially
    thought planted to draw law enforcement away from the Capitol on Jan 6?

    https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/jan-mystery-pipe-bombs-night-capitol-attack/story?id=81723935

    Partisan update:

    https://judiciary.house.gov/media/press-releases/republicans-release-new-information-january-6-pipe-bomb-investigation

    Useless, but still more credible than anything associated with Carlson
    or Darren Beattie.

    https://www.mediamatters.org/january-6-insurrection/here-are-key-right-wing-media-figures-who-rewrote-history-january-6

    Wrong on Epps, wrong on this.

    Sub-hed: "For the past three years, Tucker Carlson, Darren Beattie,
    Julie Kelly, Steve Bannon, and others have pushed a revisionist counternarrative that has undone the initial consensus about the attacks"

    Takes a lot of effort to overcome something obviously bad, but it helps
    if you can control the playing field:

    https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/was-elon-musks-strategy-twitter-rcna118490

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Tue Jan 23 11:56:05 2024
    On 1/23/24 10:38 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:52:26 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 1/22/24 11:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1748117563228483869

    It seems likely that government officials were involved in
    planting pipe bombs in Washington, DC three years ago, as part of
    an effort to keep Donald Trump from running for president again.
    Darren Beattie has details.
    Seems unlikely.

    So you have no explanation. Can you explain why police when
    notified didn't even bother to establish a perimeter to keep innocent
    people away from a potential explosion?

    The timeline of the video is not self-evident.

    And how did that bomb just sitting their exposed next to the bench go
    unseen by SS in their standard sweep before the VP elect arrives?

    The same SS with a history of concealing mistakes?

    You can't answer any of these questions....nor explain why they
    aren't even being asked beyond Tucker et al.

    More questions:

    The guy said to have discovered the pipe bomb:

    https://ia802309.us.archive.org/14/items/riley-michael-stamped-indictment-oct-2021/Riley%2C%20Michael%20-%20Stamped%20Indictment%20-%20Oct%202021.pdf

    "Riley wrote, “Hey [Person 1], im a capitol police officer who agrees
    with your political stance. Take down the part about being in the
    building they are currently investigating and everyone who was in the
    building is going to be charged. Just looking out!”

    https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-breach/just-wanted-to-give-you-a-heads-up-u-s-capitol-police-officer-charged-with-obstruction-in-connection-with-jan-6-breach/

    [Filed 06/06/22]

    "As you know, on January 6, 2021, at approximately 12:45 p.m., Officer
    Riley was the first responding officer to the pipe bomb incidents
    located near the U.S. Capitol and communicated his initial observations
    on United States Capitol Police (“USCP”) radio. He is an essential
    witness to the investigation of those events and any subsequent
    prosecution of the perpetrator(s)."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From mINE109@21:1/5 to ScottW on Wed Jan 24 09:58:58 2024
    On 1/23/24 11:24 PM, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 9:56:10 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 1/23/24 10:38 AM, ScottW wrote:
    On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:52:26 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
    On 1/22/24 11:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
    https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1748117563228483869

    It seems likely that government officials were involved in
    planting pipe bombs in Washington, DC three years ago, as part of
    an effort to keep Donald Trump from running for president again.
    Darren Beattie has details.
    Seems unlikely.

    So you have no explanation. Can you explain why police when
    notified didn't even bother to establish a perimeter to keep innocent
    people away from a potential explosion?
    The timeline of the video is not self-evident.

    to a complete moron.

    That is the intended audience.

    And how did that bomb just sitting their exposed next to the bench go
    unseen by SS in their standard sweep before the VP elect arrives?
    The same SS with a history of concealing mistakes?
    You can't answer any of these questions....nor explain why they
    aren't even being asked beyond Tucker et al.
    More questions:

    The guy said to have discovered the pipe bomb:

    https://ia802309.us.archive.org/14/items/riley-michael-stamped-indictment-oct-2021/Riley%2C%20Michael%20-%20Stamped%20Indictment%20-%20Oct%202021.pdf

    "Riley wrote, “Hey [Person 1], im a capitol police officer who agrees
    with your political stance. Take down the part about being in the
    building they are currently investigating and everyone who was in the
    building is going to be charged. Just looking out!”

    https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-breach/just-wanted-to-give-you-a-heads-up-u-s-capitol-police-officer-charged-with-obstruction-in-connection-with-jan-6-breach/

    [Filed 06/06/22]

    "As you know, on January 6, 2021, at approximately 12:45 p.m., Officer
    Riley was the first responding officer to the pipe bomb incidents
    located near the U.S. Capitol and communicated his initial observations
    on United States Capitol Police (“USCP”) radio. He is an essential
    witness to the investigation of those events and any subsequent
    prosecution of the perpetrator(s)."

    Responding.....responding to what? Usually that means in response to a call.
    Not the plain clothes guy who discovered the bomb. He was not responding.
    He was initiating.

    That's your guy. Ask him about perimeters, schoolchildren and Secret
    Service sweeps.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)