https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1748117563228483869
It seems likely that government officials were involved in planting
pipe bombs in Washington, DC three years ago, as part of an effort to
keep Donald Trump from running for president again. Darren Beattie
has details.
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:52:26 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 1/22/24 11:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1748117563228483869Seems unlikely.
It seems likely that government officials were involved in
planting pipe bombs in Washington, DC three years ago, as part of
an effort to keep Donald Trump from running for president again.
Darren Beattie has details.
So you have no explanation. Can you explain why police when
notified didn't even bother to establish a perimeter to keep innocent
people away from a potential explosion?
And how did that bomb just sitting their exposed next to the bench go
unseen by SS in their standard sweep before the VP elect arrives?
You can't answer any of these questions....nor explain why they
aren't even being asked beyond Tucker et al.
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 9:56:10 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:
On 1/23/24 10:38 AM, ScottW wrote:
On Tuesday, January 23, 2024 at 7:52:26 AM UTC-8, mINE109 wrote:The timeline of the video is not self-evident.
On 1/22/24 11:30 PM, ScottW wrote:
https://twitter.com/TuckerCarlson/status/1748117563228483869Seems unlikely.
It seems likely that government officials were involved in
planting pipe bombs in Washington, DC three years ago, as part of
an effort to keep Donald Trump from running for president again.
Darren Beattie has details.
So you have no explanation. Can you explain why police when
notified didn't even bother to establish a perimeter to keep innocent
people away from a potential explosion?
to a complete moron.
And how did that bomb just sitting their exposed next to the bench goThe same SS with a history of concealing mistakes?
unseen by SS in their standard sweep before the VP elect arrives?
You can't answer any of these questions....nor explain why theyMore questions:
aren't even being asked beyond Tucker et al.
The guy said to have discovered the pipe bomb:
https://ia802309.us.archive.org/14/items/riley-michael-stamped-indictment-oct-2021/Riley%2C%20Michael%20-%20Stamped%20Indictment%20-%20Oct%202021.pdf
"Riley wrote, “Hey [Person 1], im a capitol police officer who agrees
with your political stance. Take down the part about being in the
building they are currently investigating and everyone who was in the
building is going to be charged. Just looking out!”
https://lawandcrime.com/u-s-capitol-breach/just-wanted-to-give-you-a-heads-up-u-s-capitol-police-officer-charged-with-obstruction-in-connection-with-jan-6-breach/
[Filed 06/06/22]
"As you know, on January 6, 2021, at approximately 12:45 p.m., Officer
Riley was the first responding officer to the pipe bomb incidents
located near the U.S. Capitol and communicated his initial observations
on United States Capitol Police (“USCP”) radio. He is an essential
witness to the investigation of those events and any subsequent
prosecution of the perpetrator(s)."
Responding.....responding to what? Usually that means in response to a call.
Not the plain clothes guy who discovered the bomb. He was not responding.
He was initiating.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 04:39:50 |
Calls: | 10,386 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,058 |
Messages: | 6,416,625 |