• Mid grade versus premium gas

    From AK@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 5 13:49:33 2022
    My 2009 mazda cx7 recommends premium grade gas.

    I have been using mid grade for about 5 years with no issues.

    I get the advertised gas mileage. 20/28 city highway.

    Is my car retarding the timing by that?

    I read where that can causing knocking.

    Wondering if regular gas would work.

    The price used to be only about 30 cents more to upgrade to midgrade.

    That is no longer the case.
    Thanks,
    Andy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to scientist77017@gmail.com on Tue Sep 6 16:54:41 2022
    AK <scientist77017@gmail.com> wrote:
    My 2009 mazda cx7 recommends premium grade gas.

    I have been using mid grade for about 5 years with no issues.

    I get the advertised gas mileage. 20/28 city highway.

    Is my car retarding the timing by that?

    Put it on a scanner and see. If you're not driving aggressively, it might
    not be. If you're driving aggressively, it might be.

    I read where that can causing knocking.

    No, the computer system will retard the timing to prevent that from happening. It's not like the engines of the seventies where you could damage them by
    using too low octane fuel. Now all you lose is performance when the system pulls the timing back.

    Wondering if regular gas would work.

    Maybe, try it. It won't hurt anything. It might not accelerate so well,
    but that might not bother you. Or maybe it will. Try it.
    --scott

    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AK@21:1/5 to Scott Dorsey on Wed Sep 7 23:42:11 2022
    On Tuesday, September 6, 2022 at 11:54:44 AM UTC-5, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    AK <scienti...@gmail.com> wrote:
    My 2009 mazda cx7 recommends premium grade gas.

    I have been using mid grade for about 5 years with no issues.

    I get the advertised gas mileage. 20/28 city highway.

    Is my car retarding the timing by that?
    Put it on a scanner and see. If you're not driving aggressively, it might
    not be. If you're driving aggressively, it might be.
    I read where that can causing knocking.
    No, the computer system will retard the timing to prevent that from happening.
    It's not like the engines of the seventies where you could damage them by using too low octane fuel. Now all you lose is performance when the system pulls the timing back.
    Wondering if regular gas would work.
    Maybe, try it. It won't hurt anything. It might not accelerate so well,
    but that might not bother you. Or maybe it will. Try it.
    --scott

    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."
    I will try regular gas at my next fill up.

    See if there is any performance or mileage changes.'

    Andy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From harry hornsley@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 12 14:15:49 2022
    AK said:

    I will try regular gas at my next fill up.
    See if there is any performance or mileage changes.

    A lot depends on the vehicle, the altitude, the air pressure, the engine,
    the way you drive, the load, etc., but you won't notice anything different
    most likely.

    For gas mileage you won't notice a difference because your volumetric error outweighs any theoretical differences between retarding the timing a few degrees under heavy load.

    For performance, unless you're racing, you won't likely notice the slight retardation in timing under load and, in fact, the OPTIMUM performance, I
    was told long ago, is when you are at the nanodegree of timing BTC prior to knocking.

    Hence it may be easily that you get better gas mileage and better
    performance, but my first two statements will outweigh them all.

    1. It depends on the mechanical factors, but,
    2. Almost certainly, you won't notice any difference.

    If you checked timing under load, you might see the difference but most
    cars, I'm told, constantly change timing so you'd need to compare graphs
    from different runs (which goes back to my statement that you can't measure
    the difference with your equipment).

    If I'm wrong, let me know as I don't mind learning from others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris K-Man (Zickcermacity)@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 12 14:18:00 2022
    On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 4:49:35 PM UTC-4, AK wrote:
    My 2009 mazda cx7 recommends premium grade gas.

    I have been using mid grade for about 5 years with no issues.

    I get the advertised gas mileage. 20/28 city highway.

    Is my car retarding the timing by that?

    I read where that can causing knocking.

    Wondering if regular gas would work.

    The price used to be only about 30 cents more to upgrade to midgrade.

    That is no longer the case.
    Thanks,
    Andy

    _________________

    I've heard that it's better in the long run, for lawn and snow equipment, to splurge on a 1-2gallon
    tank of 89 or 93 octane gas, because I was told it had a lower amount of ethanol or mtbe in it -
    additives that can damage mowers, leaf blowers, and snow machines.

    Any validity to this claim?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris K-Man (Zickcermacity)@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 12 14:16:30 2022
    On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 4:49:35 PM UTC-4, AK wrote:
    My 2009 mazda cx7 recommends premium grade gas.

    I have been using mid grade for about 5 years with no issues.

    I get the advertised gas mileage. 20/28 city highway.

    Is my car retarding the timing by that?

    I read where that can causing knocking.

    Wondering if regular gas would work.

    The price used to be only about 30 cents more to upgrade to midgrade.

    That is no longer the case.
    Thanks,
    Andy
    _________________

    I've heard that it's better in the long run, for lawn and snow equipment, to splurge on a 1-2gallon tank of 89 or 93 octane gas, because I was told it had a lower amount of ethanol or mtbe in it - additives that can damage mowers and snow throwers.

    Any validity to this claim?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris K-Man (Zickcermacity)@21:1/5 to Scott Dorsey on Mon Sep 12 15:53:15 2022
    On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 6:41:05 PM UTC-4, Scott Dorsey wrote:
    Chris K-Man (Zickcermacity) <thekma...@gmail.com> wrote:
    I've heard that it's better in the long run, for lawn and snow equipment, to splurge on a 1-2gallon tank of 89 or 93 octane gas, because I was told it had a lower amount of ethanol or mtbe in it - additives that can damage mowers and snow throwers.

    Any validity to this claim?
    MTBE and ethanol are added to gasoline to increase octane.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres
    __________

    About two seasons ago, my local small engine repair place told me to
    buy higher octane gas because it contained less of those additives, which he said harms the engines in lawnmowers and snow blowers.

    If I wanted to increase octane, I would simply buy 93 all the time!

    duhhh..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott Dorsey@21:1/5 to thekmanrocks@gmail.com on Mon Sep 12 22:41:01 2022
    Chris K-Man (Zickcermacity) <thekmanrocks@gmail.com> wrote:
    I've heard that it's better in the long run, for lawn and snow equipment, to splurge on a 1-2gallon tank of 89 or 93 octane gas, because I was told it had a lower amount of ethanol or mtbe in it - additives that can damage mowers and snow throwers.

    Any validity to this claim?

    MTBE and ethanol are added to gasoline to increase octane.
    --scott
    --
    "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AK@21:1/5 to harry hornsley on Tue Sep 13 21:00:38 2022
    On Monday, September 12, 2022 at 1:15:52 PM UTC-5, harry hornsley wrote:
    AK said:

    I will try regular gas at my next fill up.
    See if there is any performance or mileage changes.
    A lot depends on the vehicle, the altitude, the air pressure, the engine,
    the way you drive, the load, etc., but you won't notice anything different most likely.

    For gas mileage you won't notice a difference because your volumetric error outweighs any theoretical differences between retarding the timing a few degrees under heavy load.

    For performance, unless you're racing, you won't likely notice the slight retardation in timing under load and, in fact, the OPTIMUM performance, I
    was told long ago, is when you are at the nanodegree of timing BTC prior to knocking.

    Hence it may be easily that you get better gas mileage and better performance, but my first two statements will outweigh them all.

    1. It depends on the mechanical factors, but,
    2. Almost certainly, you won't notice any difference.

    If you checked timing under load, you might see the difference but most
    cars, I'm told, constantly change timing so you'd need to compare graphs
    from different runs (which goes back to my statement that you can't measure the difference with your equipment).

    If I'm wrong, let me know as I don't mind learning from others.
    I probably won't see any performance change.

    But my wallet will.

    Getting reg gas will save me $5.40 per fill up. :-)

    Andy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Snag@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 15 15:27:08 2022
    On 9/12/2022 4:16 PM, Chris K-Man (Zickcermacity) wrote:
    On Monday, September 5, 2022 at 4:49:35 PM UTC-4, AK wrote:
    My 2009 mazda cx7 recommends premium grade gas.

    I have been using mid grade for about 5 years with no issues.

    I get the advertised gas mileage. 20/28 city highway.

    Is my car retarding the timing by that?

    I read where that can causing knocking.

    Wondering if regular gas would work.

    The price used to be only about 30 cents more to upgrade to midgrade.

    That is no longer the case.
    Thanks,
    Andy
    _________________

    I've heard that it's better in the long run, for lawn and snow equipment, to splurge on a 1-2gallon tank of 89 or 93 octane gas, because I was told it had a lower amount of ethanol or mtbe in it - additives that can damage mowers and snow throwers.

    Any validity to this claim?


    I don't know about where you live , but here we can get non-ethanol
    premium . Useta be able to get non-eth regular too but they shut that
    station down because they wouldn't lease new pumps . I burn that premium
    in my bikes , and a 50/50 mix in my Stihl engine tools - until they cut
    off my supply of N-E regular , now they too will get premium when my
    supply of 50/50 is gone.
    I don't know yet what the new motor in the truck wants but I'm hoping
    it'll burn 87 octane - with a 9.7:1 c/r and other performance mods it
    might want mid-grade . It's old enough (1986) that it doesn't have
    computerized controls . Fortunately it's not destined to be a daily
    driver , it's my toy now . Can you say "sleeper" ?
    --
    Snag
    "You can lad a dummy to facts
    but you can't make him think."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)