• =?UTF-8?Q?Hamas=E2=80=99s_Main_Source_of_Funding_Might_Surprise_You?=

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 23 10:15:20 2023
    XPost: soc.history.war.misc, sci.military.naval, or.politics
    XPost: seattle.politics, alt.law-enforcement

    from
    https://news.yahoo.com/hamas-survive-israel-invasion-gaza-110000449.html

    Hamas’s Main Source of Funding Might Surprise You
    Aki Peritz
    Wed, November 22, 2023 at 3:00 AM PST·6 min read
    127

    Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu recently said Israel is “in
    the midst of a fight for our existence” and that its invasion of the
    Gaza Strip aims “to eliminate Hamas by destroying its military and
    governance capabilities.”

    That’s certainly a lofty goal. Unfortunately, the American experience in Afghanistan over the past two decades indicates that it is almost
    impossible to crush a nonstate actor if its leadership and finances are protected in countries that one’s military will not, or cannot, attack.
    Since Hamas’s leadership lives and its fundraising occurs outside of
    Gaza, it’s unclear how Israel can truly fulfill its goal of destroying
    the terrorist group.

    One of this conflict’s greatest ironies is that Hamas has Netanyahu to
    thank in part for its strength. For years, he has propped up Hamas in
    Gaza in order to weaken the Fatah-led Palestinian Authority, or P.A., in
    the West Bank, thereby dashing hopes for a two-state solution. He
    reportedly admitted as much in 2019, in defending his decision to allow
    Qatari funds to flow into Gaza.

    Another irony is that while Hamas fully controls the institutions of
    governance in Gaza, the P.A. is paying the lion’s share of the
    international aid flowing into the area. For example, in 2021 alone, the
    P.A. transferred $1.7 billion to Gaza, theoretically to pay the salaries
    and pensions of tens of thousands of civil servants idled by Hamas’s
    brutal takeover of Gaza in 2007. A similar phenomenon occurred in Iraq
    when Baghdad for years effectively subsidized tens of thousands of
    workers operating in Islamic State–controlled areas.

    The P.A.—which Secretary of State Antony Blinken recently said should
    take over Gaza once the war is over—reportedly transfers up to 30
    percent of its annual budget to the Gaza Strip. The authority also controversially pays a stipend to Palestinians in Gaza and elsewhere who
    are imprisoned in Israeli jails, or to the families of Palestinians who
    were killed while carrying out an attack. But here’s a further
    conundrum: Israel collects the P.A.’s taxes and customs duties—which
    make up 65 percent of the Palestinian budget—because the P.A. does not
    have official statehood status. This means Israel can freeze or deduct
    this money whenever it likes, which it did earlier this month.

    Additional aid to Gaza comes from oil-rich Qatar (where many senior
    Hamas leaders live and work in luxurious surroundings), which in 2021
    provided $360 million for Hamas government salaries and cash handouts to families—with Israel’s knowledge and approval. The United Nations funds
    and runs schools and hospitals in Gaza and employs many workers,
    teachers, and medical personnel, spending $600 million in 2020. These
    are, of course, avenues for Hamas to extract money through taxes,
    extortion, and black marketeering, despite the efforts of international overseers, including Israel itself.

    All this is to say that every dollar—or shekel, as the P.A. and Hamas
    largely pay their employees in Israeli currency—that Hamas does not have
    to spend on Gaza schools, hospitals, government salaries, and
    governance, the group can instead spend on terrorist purposes. Hamas
    imposes taxes and fees on the local population; that money is then spent
    on Hamas’s end goals. It is unclear how much of the P.A. money is
    skimmed by Hamas, but if the Islamic State’s financial management
    structure in Mosul can serve as a rough guide, it could be up to 50 percent.

    This is in addition to what other donors provide. Anonymous Western
    officials speaking to The Wall Street Journal estimated that Iran
    provides Hamas $100 million annually for military activities, while the terrorist group generates $12 million to $15 million a month on smuggled Egyptian goods, according to Gaza-based economist Mohammed Abu Jayab. A
    recent analysis from Die Welt suggests Hamas sits upon a financial
    empire worth $700 million.

    Hamas has even experimented in recent years with using cryptocurrencies
    to evade government surveillance. While the full extent of its efforts
    is unknown, Israel as recently as mid-October continues to freeze
    Hamas-linked crypto accounts.

    Even with these diversified income streams, the money itself never has
    to touch Gaza. Hamas and its allies, like most sophisticated terrorist
    groups, have built a complicated web of global money-laundering streams
    with the assistance of the Iranians. It is probably impossible for
    forensic accountants to unravel completely Hamas’s financial dealings.
    The U.S. Treasury Department is playing financial whack-a-mole; last
    month, it sanctioned several Hamas investment portfolio managers living
    in the West Bank, Sudan, Turkey, Algeria, and Qatar. A further wrinkle
    is that if, say, Israel cuts off the P.A.’s $1.7 billion to Gaza, it
    will negatively impact the very people who would serve as the governing backbone of a potential post-Hamas Gaza.

    It also doesn’t really cost that much to carry out a terrorist attack.
    The September 11, 2001, attacks cost Al Qaeda under half a million
    dollars, according to the 9/11 Commission—with the hijackers even
    returning $26,000 to an Emirati facilitator right before the strike
    because they didn’t need it. While it remains unclear how much it cost
    Hamas financially for its October 7 attack on Israel, the terrorist
    group almost certainly has enough flexibility to weather whatever
    financial penalties are coming. And if not, their funders have more than
    enough money to compensate them for their losses.

    Terrorism is political theater; the terrorists want the public to watch
    their horrific acts and to fear what’s coming next. That’s likely why so many Hamas attackers wore GoPro cameras and videotaped their murderous behavior. But their monstrous activities were in service of a political goal—to force an overreaction by Israel that causes misery for a
    civilian population where Hamas hides and operates. This can generate
    new recruits, propaganda, and support—diplomatic and financial—from
    allies in the region and further abroad.

    Hamas must be destroyed or at least neutered as a terrorist organization
    for this conflict to conclude. Sadly, without eliminating Hamas’s
    leadership outside of Gaza and cutting off its regional financial
    lifelines, the goal of decisively crushing the group once and for all
    will remain out of reach. After this round of war ends, there will
    remain aggrieved Gazans looking to commit violence against Israel,
    buttressed by an Islamist ideology to justify murderous actions. There
    will also continue to be enough money and direction from outside of the
    Strip. Thus, the conflict in Gaza will likely burn on, ebbing and
    flowing as it has done for years, no matter the outcome of Israel’s
    current military operation.

    View comments (127)

    Daniel Clair
    19 hours ago
    The wrap up up of the US Mission in Afgahnistan is the ultimate example
    of the US Military Strategy over the 75 years. The Military planners in
    the Pentagon have no intention of ever ending any conflict the US gets
    involved in with a victory. We have been engaged in wars somewhere in
    the world ever since we entered WW2. Of the wars we have been engaged
    in we have won exactly one and that was the brief incursion in Grenada
    under Reagan. Every time we have gotten close to a victory the
    Establishment begins to whine and whisper about justifications and
    humanity etc. Korea, Truman decided to take a loss rather than allow
    Macarthur to win the war that would have eliminated the Communist Korean
    army and much of the Communist Chinese army. There was never any
    serious attempt to win in Viet Nam, Desert Storm we were just days away
    from total control over that country yet the Establishment demanded that
    Bush pull the troupes. out of the fight allowing that cesspool to
    fester, we are still there in a worse position than before, going on
    would be quite possible but trying to convince the true believers in the Establishment is pointless. The Establishment are nothing but War
    Profiteers heavily invested in the Military Industrial Complex they need
    the sacrifice of America's youth to feed their family and buy their
    luxury live stye.


    Craig
    23 hours ago
    "the conflict in Gaza will likely burn on, ebbing and flowing as it has
    done for years, no matter the outcome of Israel’s current military operation."

    I'm sure this is true but that doesn't mean that the fanatical Humas
    fighters won't be entirely eliminated from Gaza for at least until the
    Israeli military leaves.


    3 replies


    Dani
    1 day ago

    The question is not if Israel can or cannot , because it certainly can.
    The question is if the divided international community is ready to
    stomach what it takes to have Hamas eradicated. It is a psychological
    issue of two main factors, the first is to accept that Hamas consists of
    far more than only 40.000 terrorists and the second is to realize that
    the altruistic human rights equations the west is so worshipful upon
    cannot be implemented for such society which is riddled with Hate, Crime
    and fundamentalist Islamic doctrine. The second is extremely hard to
    dislodge in western psyche for it lazily for decays concentrated on
    defining principles of right and wrong as opposed to looking at
    situations and people for what they are. The universe is made in such
    way that any thing that becomes too stiff is bent or destroyed and those
    same values that where once brave and virtuous will be the making of
    ones own grave if held onto in later periods.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)