• NASA's Proposed (Nuclear) Plasma Rocket Would Get Us to Mars in 2 Month

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 9 08:07:26 2024
    XPost: alt.astronomy, alt.fan.heinlein, soc.history.war.misc

    from https://gizmodo.com/nasa-pulsed-plasma-rocket-advanced-concept-mars-1851463831

    NASA's Proposed Plasma Rocket Would Get Us to Mars in 2 Months
    The space agency is investing in the development of a propulsion system
    that uses nuclear power to create plasma bursts.
    By
    Passant Rabie
    PublishedYesterday
    Comments (28)
    An illustration of a spacecraft with the pulsed plasma rocket.
    An illustration of a spacecraft with the pulsed plasma
    rocket.Screenshot: Howe Industries

    The future of space travel depends on our ability to reach celestial pit
    stops faster and more efficiently. As such, NASA is working with a
    technology development company on a new propulsion system that could
    drop off humans on Mars in a relatively speedy two months’ time rather
    than the current nine month journey required to reach the Red Planet.

    NASA’s Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) program recently selected six promising projects for additional funding and development, allowing them
    to graduate to the second stage of development. The new “science
    fiction-like concepts,” as described by John Nelson, NIAC program
    executive at NASA, include a lunar railway system and fluid-based
    telescopes, as well as a pulsed plasma rocket.

    The potentially groundbreaking propulsion system is being developed by Arizona-based Howe Industries. To reach high velocities within a shorter
    period of time, the pulsed plasma rocket would use nuclear fission—the release of energy from atoms splitting apart—to generate packets of
    plasma for thrust.

    It would essentially produce a controlled jet of plasma to help propel
    the rocket through space. Using the new propulsion system, and in terms
    of thrust, the rocket could potentially generate up to 22,481 pounds of
    force (100,000 Newtons) with a specific impulse (Isp) of 5,000 seconds,
    for remarkably high fuel efficiency.


    PPR Final Render w music
    It’s not an entirely new concept. NASA began developing its own version
    back in 2018 under the name Pulsed Fission-Fusion (PuFF). PuFF relied on
    a device commonly used to compress laboratory plasmas to high pressures
    for very short timescales, called z-Pinch, to produce thrust. The pulsed
    plasma rocket, however, is smaller, simpler, and more affordable,
    according to NASA.

    The space agency claims that the propulsion system’s high efficiency
    could allow for crewed missions to Mars to be completed within two
    months. As it stands today with commonly used propulsion systems, a trip
    to Mars takes around nine months. The less time humans can spend
    traveling through space, the better. Shorter periods of exposure to
    space radiation and microgravity could help mitigate its effects on the
    human body.

    The pulsed plasma rocket would also be capable of carrying much heavier spacecraft, which can be then equipped with shielding against galactic
    cosmic rays for the crew on board.

    Phase 2 of NIAC is focused on assessing the neutronics of the system
    (how the motion of the spacecraft interacts with the plasma), designing
    the spacecraft, power system, and necessary subsystems, analyzing the
    magnetic nozzle capabilities, and determining trajectories and benefits
    of the pulsed plasma rocket, according to NASA.

    The new propulsion system has the potential to revolutionize crewed spaceflight, helping humans make it to Mars without the toil of the trip itself.

    MORE FROM GIZMODO
    Tesla Quietly Removes All U.S. Job Postings
    Cybertruck Owner Breaks His Finger Trying to Show Vehicle Is Safe
    One of the Most Important Sci-Fi Shows of the 21st Century Is Finally
    Easy to Stream Again
    'I Really Hope No Other Parent Has Disappointed Kids Like Mine': Fake
    Websites for Little Tikes Swindle Parents
    For more spaceflight in your life, follow us on X and bookmark Gizmodo’s dedicated Spaceflight page.

    Show all

    comments include

    t Pat
    Passant Rabie
    5/08/24 1:53pm
    yes, bringing fissile material up into space by (presumably) way of a
    rocket, filled with explosive material, sounds like a peach of an idea. FFS

    2
    Reply4 replies

    Dr Emilio Lizardo
    Passant Rabie
    5/08/24 2:17pm
    That means you need to carry less supplies per person, which leaves more
    room for other things. That kind of speed also extends the launch window
    and makes you much less dependent on the relative location of the two
    planets. It changes just about everything that makes the mission
    logistically difficult. It doesn’t fix those problems, but it makes
    them a lot simpler to solve with fewer complications.

    16
    Reply

    ManOfConstantScience
    Dr Emilio Lizardo
    5/08/24 2:43pm
    And it means they have to worry less about a surprise solar storm giving
    the entire crew radiation poisoning on the way.

    Darwinian Man
    ManOfConstantScience
    5/08/24 4:08pm
    It says that the rocket can propel heavier spacecraft, which would allow
    for a decently-sized solar storm refuge within the ship if there was a
    solar storm en route,

    2
    Reply

    Thomas Hajicek
    Darwinian Man
    5/08/24 4:21pm
    But how will we get the Fantastic 4 then?

    8
    Reply

    Darwinian Man
    Thomas Hajicek
    5/08/24 6:11pm
    Good point.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)