• Dangerous ISIS Tajiks come across US borders

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jun 14 15:56:40 2024
    XPost: or.politics, seattle.politics, ca.politics
    XPost: alt.law-enforcement, sci.military.naval

    Leaving our borders wide open is dangerous!

    from https://www.cnn.com/2024/06/14/politics/isis-us-fears-terror-attack/index.html

    ‘ISIS isn’t done with us’: Arrested Tajiks highlight US fears of terror attack on US
    Katie Bo Lillis Josh Campbell
    By Katie Bo Lillis and Josh Campbell, CNN
    7 minute read
    Published 2:00 AM EDT, Fri June 14, 2024

    The badge of a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's officer is seen
    in 2020. In June 2024, federal agents arrested eight Tajikistan
    nationals believed to have connections to ISIS.
    The badge of a US Immigration and Customs Enforcement's officer is seen
    in 2020. In June 2024, federal agents arrested eight Tajikistan
    nationals believed to have connections to ISIS. Lucy Nicholson/Reuters/File
    CNN

    The recent arrest of eight Tajik nationals believed to have connections
    to ISIS has heightened concerns among national security officials that a dangerous affiliate of the now-splintered terror group could potentially
    carry out an attack on US soil, according to multiple US officials who
    spoke to CNN.

    Members of the group initially entered the US at the southern border and requested asylum under US immigration law. It’s unclear whether they
    entered at the same time and place.

    By the time intelligence collected on overseas ISIS targets connected
    the men to the terror group, they had already been vetted by immigration authorities and allowed into the country, officials said.

    Though there is no hard evidence indicating they were sent to the US as
    part of a terror plot, at least some of the Tajik nationals had
    expressed extremist rhetoric in their communications, either on social
    media or in direct private communications that US intelligence was able
    to monitor, three officials said.

    That discovery set off a flurry of emergency investigative efforts by
    federal agents and analysts across the country, sources said, including physical and electronic surveillance of the men — a counterterrorism operation reminiscent of the years immediately following 9/11, when the
    FBI investigated numerous homegrown plots.

    After a period of surveillance, federal officials in recent days faced a difficult decision: whether to continue surveilling the men in order to determine if they were part of any potential plot or wider terrorist
    network, or to move in and take them off the street. Rather than risk
    the worst-case scenario of a potential attack, senior US officials
    decided to move in and have the men apprehended by ICE agents, one
    source told CNN.

    The men remain in federal custody on immigration charges and will
    eventually be deported following the counterterror investigation into them.

    Tajiks recruited by ISIS
    Of particular concern to US officials was that the men hail from
    Tajikistan, a corner of Central Asia that in recent years has been a
    source of steady recruitment by ISIS-K, the Afghanistan-based affiliate
    of the Islamic terrorist group. ISIS-K is led primarily by Tajiks, who
    have carried out a series of recent attacks in Europe on behalf of the
    group, including the Crocus Hall attack in Moscow in March that killed
    more than 100 people.

    National security officials fear that at least some of the eight Tajiks
    were ripe for radicalization by ISIS-K while they were inside the United States, potentially struggling with isolation, financial stress or discrimination — all things that could make a person susceptible to ISIS propaganda glorifying violence.

    Senior officials now see a so-called “lone-wolf” attacker who emerges seemingly from nowhere as perhaps the more likely — and potentially
    equally dangerous — threat, rather than the more traditional coordinated
    plot carried out by trained operatives.

    Ambulances and vehicles of Russian emergency services are parked at the
    burning Crocus City Hall concert venue following a shooting incident,
    outside Moscow, Russia, March 22, 2024.
    RELATED ARTICLE
    Central Asian migrants face xenophobic backlash in Russia after Moscow
    terror attack
    Compared to terror networks, whose communications can provide possible
    avenues for surveillance exploitation, lone individuals who do not
    telegraph their attack plans to anyone present an additionally difficult challenge for security officials.

    “We can’t assume it’s not all of the above,” said one senior US official. “We’re too early to know everything we want to know about the depth and texture of the links that might be there” between these eight people and ISIS.

    The episode comes as senior intelligence officials have been publicly
    warning that global conditions have put the risk of a terror attack on
    US soil at its highest level in recent memory — at the same time that
    many national security officials also acknowledge that American
    drawdowns in Afghanistan and elsewhere in the Middle East have reduced intelligence-gathering on traditional terrorism threats.

    “It’s no secret that since our drawdowns in various places around the world, we collect less intelligence. This was always a tradeoff we knew
    we were making,” the senior US official said.

    Former acting CIA Director Michael Morell this week co-wrote a widely circulated piece in Foreign Affairs warning that terrorism warning
    lights are “blinking red,” echoing a recent warning by FBI Director Christopher Wray, who said he sees “blinking lights everywhere I turn.”

    “The combination of stated intentions of terrorist groups, growing capabilities they have demonstrated in recent successful and failed
    attacks around the world, and the fact that several serious plots in the
    United States have been foiled, point us to an uncomfortable but
    unavoidable conclusion,” the Foreign Affairs piece read. “Put simply,
    the United States faces a serious threat of a terrorist attack in the
    months ahead.”

    Gaps in intelligence collection
    Intelligence officials are keenly aware of gaps in intelligence
    collection in Afghanistan, where ISIS-K is primarily based. While
    officials believe that ISIS-K mainly tries to radicalize and inspire
    attackers rather than train and field operatives, the group’s rise to prominence is a relatively new phenomenon. That means that there is much
    that US counterterrorism analysts don’t know about its strategy,
    recruitment efforts and operational tactics.

    US officials and analysts who closely track Islamist terror groups do
    know that ISIS-K has dramatically ramped up its online propaganda
    machine. Rather than training and deploying fighters — as al Qaeda did
    in the 9/11 attacks, for example — ISIS-K has instead focused on
    radicalizing vulnerable populations. Tajikistan, for example, is one of
    the poorest countries in the world and its population faces extreme
    religious repression, both factors that terrorism experts say can make a population vulnerable to radicalization.


    See inside a high-security prison for suspected ISIS fighters in Syria
    01:52 - Source: CNN
    Colin Clarke, a researcher who specializes in terrorism, said the group
    is creating “charismatic propaganda” to reach “out to diasporas that are already in place in Europe, in North America and in the region in
    Central Asia, and attempting to inspire people to conduct attacks.”

    “It seems like it’s just a matter of time before they’re able to pull something off successfully,” Clarke said.

    Concerns about the border
    The arrests also puts a spotlight on vulnerabilities at the US southern
    border, an issue Republicans have amplified in the midst of a
    presidential election year.

    “We are literally living on borrowed time,” Republican Oklahoma Sen.
    James Lankford said from the Senate floor on Wednesday during a speech
    about the threat of terrorists entering the US through the southern border.

    A June 7 report released by the DHS inspector general found that asylum
    seekers were not always screened in a timely fashion and that border
    agents could not access all the federal data they needed to vet
    noncitizens seeking admission into the US.

    The US is “at risk of admitting dangerous persons into the country or enabling asylum seekers who may pose significant threats to public
    safety and national security to continue to reside in the United
    States,” the report said.

    US officials have been paying particular attention to immigrants from
    Central Asian countries including Tajikistan since last summer, when a
    group Uzbek nationals who had crossed the southern border were later
    found to have been assisted in traveling to the United States by a
    facilitator who had ties to ISIS.

    The episode sparked a scramble across the US government to locate and investigate those people.

    The security of the southern border has been a political sticking point
    between Republicans and the Biden administration.
    RELATED ARTICLE
    Exclusive: Smuggler with ties to ISIS helped migrants enter US from
    Mexico, raising alarm bells across government
    Two US officials also said that it spurred national security officials
    to ensure that immigration and intelligence authorities were
    appropriately monitoring anyone traveling from Tajikistan, Uzbekistan
    and Kazakhstan.

    “I think what [the incident with the Uzbek nationals] did last summer
    was suggest central Asians are potentially a population of concern,
    given what we know about the global ISIS network right now,” the senior
    US official said.

    In 2023, CBP reported 169 encounters with individuals identified as “potential matches” with names on the terrorism watch list.

    But that’s not necessarily a reliable gauge of the number of actual terrorists who may be trying to enter the United States, US officials
    argue. When a name pings on a terror watch list, it could mean any
    number of things: a person could have a very loose, attenuated
    connection to a known terrorist. Or they could belong to a legacy terror
    group — like the FARC — that isn’t known for conducting attacks on US soil. Or they could simply have a similar name as a person of legitimate concern.

    That’s what happened with the Jordanian national who was arrested at the gates of the US Marines base at Quantico earlier this year, two US
    officials said. Although his name returned a hit against one of the
    watch lists, it turned out to be a “bad match,” according to the senior
    US official.

    The blending of criminality and terrorism in poor countries — like
    Tajikistan — can also prove incredibly difficult for law enforcement officials to unravel. A person may have regular contact with a family
    member who has done some paid work for ISIS, for example, without
    themselves sharing any sympathy for the group.

    But, Clarke said, the risk is there: “Crushing poverty [and] an
    extremely religious population that’s suppressed by its leaders — it’s almost a perfect formula for exporting jihadists.”

    Said one law enforcement source: “It’s become cliché, but remains absolutely true: We may be done with ISIS, but ISIS isn’t done with us.”

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)