• Re: The Theodosian Walls of Constantinople,

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 3 16:26:17 2025
    XPost: soc.history.medieval, soc.history.war.misc

    On 3/3/25 16:10, a425couple wrote:
    My wife showed me an advertisement from a travel agency that
    has her on their list.  It was a great deal for around 10 days
    in Greece and islands.  She said Greece was on her bucket list.
    OK, we signed up.  Cheapest air was Turkish Airlines, so it
    had a change of plane in Istanbul.
    Well, a recent read of mine was "The Fall of Constantinople 1453"

    I failed to properly double check, the book I read was
    1453: The Holy War for Constantinople and the Clash of Islam
    and the West Paperback – Illustrated, August 15, 2006
    by Roger Crowley

    by Steven Runciman.  So I said, lets see if we can lay over
    a couple of days and see that wonderful historic city.
    These Theodosian Walls of Constantinople spanned the entire
    Medieval Ages.

    from a facebook post

    History pictures  · Follow
    rdtpeosoSn

    aThe Theodosian Walls of Constantinople, once a formidable defense
    system protecting the Byzantine Empire, stood as a monumental
    achievement in engineering and fortification for over a thousand years.
    By the 1950s, however, these walls had begun to show the effects of time
    and neglect. Erosion, wear, and the expanding city of Istanbul had taken their toll, and while the walls remained impressive, they were no longer
    the impenetrable barriers they once were.
    Despite their deteriorating state, the walls still served as a powerful symbol of the city’s rich historical legacy and its enduring resilience.
    In the 1950s, as Istanbul rapidly modernized, the ancient structure was
    often overlooked in the rush to expand the city, but it still attracted
    the attention of historians, architects, and curious visitors eager to connect with the past. The walls stood as a quiet reminder of Constantinople's former glory amid the growing urban sprawl.
    As modern buildings and infrastructure grew up around the walls, a stark contrast emerged between the ancient fortifications and the contemporary cityscape. The juxtaposition of old and new reflected Istanbul’s complex history, where the past and present coexisted side by side. Though the Theodosian Walls were no longer the city's primary defense, they
    remained an enduring testament to the endurance and history of one of
    the world’s greatest empires., once a formidable defense system
    protecting the Byzantine Empire, stood as a monumental achievement in engineering and fortification for over a thousand years. By the 1950s, however, these walls had begun to show the effects of time and neglect. Erosion, wear, and the expanding city of Istanbul had taken their toll,
    and while the walls remained impressive, they were no longer the
    impenetrable barriers they once were.
    Despite their deteriorating state, the walls still served as a powerful symbol of the city’s rich historical legacy and its enduring resilience.
    In the 1950s, as Istanbul rapidly modernized, the ancient structure was
    often overlooked in the rush to expand the city, but it still attracted
    the attention of historians, architects, and curious visitors eager to connect with the past. The walls stood as a quiet reminder of Constantinople's former glory amid the growing urban sprawl.
    As modern buildings and infrastructure grew up around the walls, a stark contrast emerged between the ancient fortifications and the contemporary cityscape. The juxtaposition of old and new reflected Istanbul’s complex history, where the past and present coexisted side by side. Though the Theodosian Walls were no longer the city's primary defense, they
    remained an enduring testament to the endurance and history of one of
    the world’s greatest empires.

    Comments include

    Richard Burke
    There was no Byzantine Empire or Byzantine Emperor. It was the Roman
    Empire with Roman Emperors.
    2d
    Reply
    Dennis Flaherty
    Richard Burke Constantine reunited the Empire and made Constantinople
    its new capital, yes, but that concept didn't outlive his reign.
    Following his death, the empire remained split West and East, with
    capitals at Ravenna and Constantinople, until the Western Empire fell in
    476. The Eastern Empire briefly reconquered Italy and North Africa under Justinian, but that quickly failed with the Islamic invasions and the
    loss of Italy to the Lombards.
    Don't kid yourself: the Eastern Empire never again looked at Western
    Europe as part of its realm, so the Western Empire had to be rebuilt,
    Mitre and Scepter. The Greeks failed to appreciate the effort and
    continued to regard the West as lost to barbarians.
    23h
    Reply
    Don Teeter
    Richard Burke Explain, please. After Rome fell, the eastern half
    continued on for a thousand years with its capital at Constantinople,
    fka Byzantium. Your comment looks like nonsense so explain, please.
    2d
    Reply


    Alain Barthelmé
    Thé city would so great without ottomans invasion
    1d
    Reply
    Γεώργιος Μπάρτζης
    Nothing Roman was finally left, there was no Rome to rule the east part
    of a late Roman Empire, after 476 BC.
    There was a statal, symbolic continuity of course, but as time was going
    on, a gradual procedure of hellenization took over the very soul of the state. Thus, the term "Byzantine" long after the fall of
    Constaninople,was invented from german scholars, to describe for historiographic classification purposes, the new-real identity of the
    empire.
    Far from calling the state Greek, we modern greeks, consider ourselves
    as descendants and indisputable heirs, of Byzantium in general.
    We share common language, religion, customs, ceremonies so much, that we definitely feel closer to Byzantium, than ancient Greece.
    However till mid fifties, there were some greeks who use to called
    themselves "romans" in order to emphasize their cultural particularity through the time, mostly against a certain sense of ottoman rulers' superiority.
    1d
    Reply
    Edited
    Tim Williams
    Outlasted Rome bus 1000 years
    1d
    Reply
    Veysi Budak
    Share new pics u moron ,now these wall standing with all
    magnificent,just share new photos of wall and stop to be moron
    1d
    Reply
    Michael James Sherman
    'No longer the impenetrable barrier by the 1950s'?? They were penetrated
    in the 1450s mate.
    1d
    Reply
    Quân Lê
      ·
    Can anyone name any fancy structure which was built in Anatolia after
    the invasion of Ottoman? I can’t.
    23h
    Reply
    Abraam Papadopoulos
    I love Byzantium
    19h
    Reply
    Doug Futers
    2012, I walked from Sea of Marmaris to the Golden Horn, along the wall
    1d
    Reply
    John Nano
    Amazing
    1d
    Reply
    Harold Jeffers
    Thanks for this old Pic, have not previously seen a B&W photo of this
    area of the western Land Walls w the Modern Highway, ... 1940’s or 50’s ? 1d
    Reply
    Chris Greyshade
    Comstantinople
    17h
    Reply
    Most relevant is selected, so some comments may have been filtered out.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)