• Bill Gates says AI will replace doctors, teachers within 10 years

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 27 15:42:30 2025
    XPost: seattle.politics, alt.economics, or.politics
    XPost: ca.politics, alt.law-enforcement

    from https://nypost.com/2025/03/27/business/bill-gates-said-ai-will-replace-doctors-teachers-within-10-years/

    Bill Gates says AI will replace doctors, teachers within 10 years — and claims humans won’t be needed ‘for most things’
    By Ariel Zilber
    Published March 27, 2025, 11:52 a.m. ET

    706 Comments
    0:07
    /0:49

    Bill Gates predicted that advancements in artificial intelligence will significantly reduce humanity’s role in many traditional tasks such as medicine and education — and the seismic shift could happen in less than
    10 years.

    During a recent interview with comedian Jimmy Fallon on NBC’s “The
    Tonight Show,” the Microsoft co-founder described a future where humans
    are no longer necessary “for most things” because AI technology will readily perform tasks that currently require specialized human skills.

    Today, expertise in fields such as medicine and education remains
    “rare,” Gates said, adding that those areas depend on “a great doctor” or “a great teacher.”

    Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates says that advancements in artificial intelligence will eventually negate the need for doctors and teachers.
    4
    Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates says that advancements in artificial intelligence will eventually negate the need for doctors and teachers.
    AFP via Getty Images
    But over the next decade, “great medical advice [and] great tutoring”
    will become free and commonplace, Gates said.

    Gates further elaborated on this vision of a new era he terms “free intelligence” in a conversation last month with Arthur Brooks, a Harvard professor known for his research on happiness.

    AI technology will increasingly permeate daily life, revolutionizing
    areas from healthcare and diagnosis to education — with AI tutors
    becoming broadly available, the mogul predicted.

    “It’s very profound and even a little bit scary — because it’s happening
    very quickly, and there is no upper bound,” Gates told Brooks.

    There is considerable debate about the future roles humans will play in
    an AI-driven society.

    While some analysts suggest AI will primarily help mankind become more productive and potentially create new economic opportunities and
    employment, others express concern about job stability.

    Gates recently told "Tonight Show" host Jimmy Fallon that humans won't
    be necessary "for most things" thanks to AI.
    4
    Gates recently told “Tonight Show” host Jimmy Fallon that humans won’t
    be necessary “for most things” thanks to AI.

    Microsoft AI CEO Mustafa Suleyman believes that the transformation of
    work by AI will have a “hugely destabilizing” impact.

    In his 2023 book, “The Coming Wave,” Suleyman writes: “These tools will only temporarily augment human intelligence. They will make us smarter
    and more efficient for a time, and will unlock enormous amounts of
    economic growth, but they are fundamentally labor replacing.”

    Despite acknowledging potential disruptions, Gates remains optimistic
    about AI’s positive contributions, including breakthroughs in medical treatments, climate solutions and widespread education.
    4
    Today, expertise in fields such as medicine and education remains
    “rare,” Gates said, adding that those areas depend on “a great doctor” or “a great teacher.”
    Adobe Stock Illustration
    Nonetheless, he recognizes certain activities will always remain human-specific.

    “There will be some things we reserve for ourselves,” Gates told Fallon, citing entertainment activities as examples.

    “But in terms of making things and moving things and growing food, over
    time those will be basically solved problems.”

    Still, Gates acknowledges legitimate concerns surrounding AI’s rapid development — highlighting its propensity for errors and misinformation online in a 2023 blog post.

    But the billionaire said that if he were to launch a startup today, he
    would pursue an “AI-centric” venture.

    “Today, somebody could raise billions of dollars for a new AI company [that’s just] a few sketch ideas,” Gates told CNBC’s “Make It” last September.

    AI technology will increasingly permeate daily life, revolutionizing
    areas from healthcare and diagnosis to education -- with AI tutors
    becoming broadly available, Gates predicted.
    4
    AI technology will increasingly permeate daily life, revolutionizing
    areas from healthcare and diagnosis to education — with AI tutors
    becoming broadly available, Gates predicted.
    Adobe Stock Illustration
    Gates said he wanted to encourage the next generation, adding: “I’m encouraging young people at Microsoft, OpenAI, wherever I find them:
    ‘Hey, here’s the frontier.’ Because you’re taking a fresher look at this
    than I am, and that’s your fantastic opportunity.”

    Gates has anticipated AI’s revolutionary potential for nearly a decade.


    706
    What do you think? Post a comment.

    In 2017, he highlighted Google’s DeepMind as a “profound milestone,” marveling at its capacity to outperform humans in the complex board game Go.

    Gates has admitted that recent breakthroughs surpassed even his
    expectations.

    Filed under artificial intelligence bill gates microsoft 3/27/25

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 12 14:36:42 2025
    XPost: seattle.politics, or.politics, ca.politics
    XPost: alt.law-enforcement

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Thu, 27 Mar 2025, =?UTF-8?Q?.../v wrote:
    "It's a sham. ChatGPT fooled me for a long time then I asked it these questions:

    What is the difference between slate and shale
    What is the difference between shale and slate

    I was emphasizing a priority that I perceived and it was reversed in the first answer produced from what I wanted which perked up my ears. Notice that the two answers are considerably different, as it does place some sort of priority itself that is not consistent throughout the response...

    "The meek shall inherit the Earth but not its mineral rights." -- J. Paul Getty

    I've also seen it answer exactly the opposite question from ones I've asked before. Not exactly reassuring."

    I wrote to LinkedIn circa 4 weeks ago:
    "Cátia insightfully wrote on Medium.com - "And language is never
    innocent.

    To write with a machine trained primarily in English is to confront a linguistic imperialism so deeply embedded that it becomes infrastructure.
    [. . .]

    [. . .]

    To translate is never a neutral act. [. . .] It is the quiet violence of turning one world into another, often without consent.

    [. . .] She was naming the structural asymmetry that underpins the act of translation – the way dominant languages absorb and erase, rather than reflect. She was warning us: not all speech survives the journey.

    [. . .]

    This was not translation. This was mistranslation-as-method."

    Ciao Cátia! You might be interested to look at HTTPS://Arxiv.org/abs/2308.00072 and HTTPS://Tuairisc.Ie/fiafraigh-de-chatgpt-faoi-lion-na-marbh-in-gaza-is-braithfidh-an-freagra-ar-theanga-do-cheiste
    "
    where this Medium.com article is HTTPS://Medium.com/@melokatja/bastard-language-artificial-intelligence-epistemic-coloniality-and-situated-writing-0b7a90e06591

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nicolas Paul Colin de Glocester@21:1/5 to All on Mon May 12 23:25:32 2025
    XPost: seattle.politics, or.politics, ca.politics
    XPost: alt.law-enforcement

    This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
    while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

    On Mon, 12 May 2025, Jim Wilkins wrote:
    "Having studied Latin, French and German I can assure you that translation often
    misses subtle shades of meaning and loaded code phrases"

    Dear Jim Wilkins:

    Thanks for these insights.

    Tongues do indeed lack faithful one-to-one mappings.

    Even if a faithful one-to-one mapping is possible, this does not mean that
    it cannot take many years to even suspect that a mistranslation used to be used instead. Cf. "O brave new world, that has such people in’t!" to
    German!

    I am a client de translations professionals and often the first attempt at
    a translation is not good enough to not need a revision.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)