XPost: alt.economics, seattle.politics, or.politics
XPost: ca.politics, alt.law-enforcement

from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bill-gates-predicts-only-three-jobs-will-survive-the-ai-takeover-here-is-why/articleshow/119533999.cms?from=mdr

Bill Gates predicts only three jobs will survive the AI takeover. Here
is why
SECTIONSBill Gates predi ..

Read more at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bill-gates-predicts-only-three-jobs-will-survive-the-ai-takeover-here-is-why/articleshow/119533999.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

The Three Jobs AI Can’t Replace (Yet)
1. Coders: The Architects of AI
Ironically, the people building AI systems are the ones most likely to
keep their jobs. While AI has made significant strides in generating
code, it still lacks the precision and problem-solving skills needed to
create complex software. Gates believes human programmers will remain
essential for debugging, refining, and advancing AI itself.

2. Energy Experts: The Guardians of Power
The energy sector is too vast and intricate for AI to manage alone.
Whether dealing with oil, nuclear power, or renewables, industry experts
are required to navigate regulatory landscapes, strategize sustainable solutions, and handle the unpredictable nature of global energy demands.

3. Biologists: The Explorers of Life
Biologists, particularly in medical research and scientific discovery,
rely on creativity, intuition, and critical thinking—qualities AI still struggles to replicate. While AI can analyze massive datasets and aid in diagnosing diseases, it lacks the ability to formulate groundbreaking hypotheses or make intuitive leaps in research.


Well, he may be smart, but I think it will be a long, long time
before AI can or will reduce much employment in law enforcement.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.economics, seattle.politics, or.politics
XPost: ca.politics, alt.law-enforcement

On 3/27/25 6:52 PM, a425couple wrote:

from
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bill-gates- predicts-only-three-jobs-will-survive-the-ai-takeover-here-is-why/ articleshow/119533999.cms?from=mdr

Bill Gates predicts only three jobs will survive the AI takeover. Here
is why
SECTIONSBill Gates predi ..

Read more at: https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bill-gates- predicts-only-three-jobs-will-survive-the-ai-takeover-here-is-why/ articleshow/119533999.cms? utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

The Three Jobs AI Can’t Replace (Yet)
1. Coders: The Architects of AI
Ironically, the people building AI systems are the ones most likely to
keep their jobs. While AI has made significant strides in generating
code, it still lacks the precision and problem-solving skills needed to create complex software. Gates believes human programmers will remain essential for debugging, refining, and advancing AI itself.

2. Energy Experts: The Guardians of Power
The energy sector is too vast and intricate for AI to manage alone.
Whether dealing with oil, nuclear power, or renewables, industry experts
are required to navigate regulatory landscapes, strategize sustainable solutions, and handle the unpredictable nature of global energy demands.

3. Biologists: The Explorers of Life
Biologists, particularly in medical research and scientific discovery,
rely on creativity, intuition, and critical thinking—qualities AI still struggles to replicate. While AI can analyze massive datasets and aid in diagnosing diseases, it lacks the ability to formulate groundbreaking hypotheses or make intuitive leaps in research.

Well, he may be smart, but I think it will be a long, long time
before AI can or will reduce much employment in law enforcement.

A lot of what AI will do will be dependent on what people allow it to do.

I once did a paper on computers and the law asking a lawyer, judge,
state trooper and social worker how a computer might affect their
fields. Most interesting was the judge's response.

I told him computers don't have emotions or prejudices and can already
do things quite competently in the legal field. Case based programs
handle legal questions that depend on stare decisis (precedent) quite
well. Such legal questions as in copyright or patent law. Why not
criminal law? No prejudice against the defendant; no variation in
sentence given circumstances, etc.

The judge simply said humans would not accept being judged by a
computer. Humans want to be judged by humans. Whether the computer is competent in the law becomes largely irrelevant. People would not
tolerate it!

Interesting thoughts.


SMH

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.economics, seattle.politics, or.politics
XPost: ca.politics, alt.law-enforcement

On 3/28/25 04:32, Stephen Harding wrote:

On 3/27/25 6:52 PM, a425couple wrote:

from
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bill-gates-
predicts-only-three-jobs-will-survive-the-ai-takeover-here-is-why/
articleshow/119533999.cms?from=mdr

Bill Gates predicts only three jobs will survive the AI takeover. Here
is why
SECTIONSBill Gates predi ..

Read more at:
https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/magazines/panache/bill-gates-
predicts-only-three-jobs-will-survive-the-ai-takeover-here-is-why/
articleshow/119533999.cms?
utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst

The Three Jobs AI Can’t Replace (Yet)
1. Coders: The Architects of AI
Ironically, the people building AI systems are the ones most likely to
keep their jobs. While AI has made significant strides in generating
code, it still lacks the precision and problem-solving skills needed
to create complex software. Gates believes human programmers will
remain essential for debugging, refining, and advancing AI itself.

2. Energy Experts: The Guardians of Power
The energy sector is too vast and intricate for AI to manage alone.
Whether dealing with oil, nuclear power, or renewables, industry
experts are required to navigate regulatory landscapes, strategize
sustainable solutions, and handle the unpredictable nature of global
energy demands.

3. Biologists: The Explorers of Life
Biologists, particularly in medical research and scientific discovery,
rely on creativity, intuition, and critical thinking—qualities AI
still struggles to replicate. While AI can analyze massive datasets
and aid in diagnosing diseases, it lacks the ability to formulate
groundbreaking hypotheses or make intuitive leaps in research.


Well, he may be smart, but I think it will be a long, long time
before AI can or will reduce much employment in law enforcement.

A lot of what AI will do will be dependent on what people allow it to do.

I once did a paper on computers and the law asking a lawyer, judge,
state trooper and social worker how a computer might affect their
fields.  Most interesting was the judge's response.

I told him computers don't have emotions or prejudices and can already
do things quite competently in the legal field.  Case based programs
handle legal questions that depend on stare decisis (precedent) quite
well.  Such legal questions as in copyright or patent law.  Why not criminal law?  No prejudice against the defendant; no variation in
sentence given circumstances, etc.

The judge simply said humans would not accept being judged by a
computer.  Humans want to be judged by humans.  Whether the computer is competent in the law becomes largely irrelevant.  People would not
tolerate it!

Interesting thoughts.
SMH

I certainly agree with him.
And by similar thought, when people interact with a "state trooper"
(or any law enforcement officer) or social worker, they want to
feel a fellow human being is really paying attention to them.

I spent 5 years as a detective. I found when I visited
a suspect in jail the day after their arrest, after reading and
fully informing them of their constitutional rights,
I would just sit quietly for a minute, then say "I bet this is
not the best day of your life."
They generally gave me an understanding look.




--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)