• Re: US demands to know what allies would do in event of war over Taiwan

    From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 12 07:56:44 2025
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc, alt.war.world-war-three
    XPost: alt.economics

    On 7/12/25 07:47, a425couple wrote:
    from
    https://www.ft.com/content/41e272e4-5b25-47ee-807c-2b57c1316fe4

        US demands to know what allies would do in event of war over Taiwan Trump administration says it is trying to prevent war but raises
    eyebrows by calling for commitments from Australia and Japan

    Elbridge Colby, right, the under-secretary of defence for policy. The
    request for commitments related to a war over Taiwan marks a new demand
    from the US © Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

    The Pentagon is pressing Japan and Australia to make clear what role
    they would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan, in an
    effort that has frustrated the two most important American allies in the Indo-Pacific.

    Elbridge Colby, under-secretary of defence for policy, has been pushing
    the issue in meetings with Japanese and Australian defence officials in recent months, said five people familiar with the discussions.

    implausible
    1 HOUR AGO
    I keep hoping we will not go to war over Taiwan.

    We are running out of key munitions, and in real terms, the defense
    non-budget keeps falling.

    Non-budget reflects Robert Gates’ op-ed about annual budget deals
    driving out strategy.


    NYLONer
    2 HOURS AGO
    The US has a policy of strategic ambiguity regarding Taiwan… but we’re asking allies what they are going to do? That makes zero sense.

    Share

    Report

    Ozzacca
    2 HOURS AGO


    In reply to NYLONer
    They could serve dinner? It is strategically ambiguous!

    Share

    Report

    Woodford Hedgehogg
    60 MINUTES AGO


    In reply to NYLONer
    The current administration is a complete disaster

    Share

    Report

    SAABist
    2 HOURS AGO
    This is an interesting exercise in ambiguity on the part of this POTUS.
    We are told it has been the recurring matter in the WH since Clinton, to complain that America is paying too dearly for the privilege of being
    the "world policemen", and that other powers should dig deeper and be
    more proactive in confronting the "bad boys".
    Yes, I stand up to the school yard bully while my big friend encourages
    my courage and sups his latte?

    Share

    Report

    MK Melb
    2 HOURS AGO

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From a425couple@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 12 07:47:36 2025
    XPost: sci.military.naval, soc.history.war.misc, alt.war.world-war-three
    XPost: alt.economics

    from
    https://www.ft.com/content/41e272e4-5b25-47ee-807c-2b57c1316fe4

    US demands to know what allies would do in event of war over Taiwan Trump administration says it is trying to prevent war but raises
    eyebrows by calling for commitments from Australia and Japan

    Elbridge Colby, right, the under-secretary of defence for policy. The
    request for commitments related to a war over Taiwan marks a new demand
    from the US © Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images

    The Pentagon is pressing Japan and Australia to make clear what role
    they would play if the US and China went to war over Taiwan, in an
    effort that has frustrated the two most important American allies in the Indo-Pacific.

    Elbridge Colby, under-secretary of defence for policy, has been pushing
    the issue in meetings with Japanese and Australian defence officials in
    recent months, said five people familiar with the discussions.

    The push is his latest effort to convince US allies in the Indo-Pacific
    to enhance deterrence and prepare for a potential war over Taiwan.

    A US defence official declined to comment about the request related to
    Taiwan, but stressed the “animating theme” of Colby’s discussions with allies was “to intensify and accelerate efforts to strengthen deterrence
    in a balanced, equitable way”.

    The official stressed that the Pentagon’s efforts were “focused on preventing war, with a strong shield of deterrence”.

    “That requires strength — but it is a simple fact that our allies must
    also do their part,” he said. “We do not seek war. Nor do we seek to dominate China itself. What we are doing is ensuring the United States
    and its allies have the military strength to underwrite diplomacy and
    guarantee peace.”

    The talks include efforts to persuade allies to raise defence spending
    amid rising concern about China’s threat to Taiwan. But the request for commitments related to a war over the island is a new demand from the US.

    “Concrete operational planning and exercises that have direct
    application to a Taiwan contingency are moving forward with Japan and Australia,” said one person. “But this request caught Tokyo and Canberra
    by surprise because the US itself does not give a blank cheque guarantee
    to Taiwan.”

    The US has long had a policy of “strategic ambiguity” under which it
    does not say if it would defend the island. Former president Joe Biden
    on four occasions deviated from that, saying the US would intervene. But
    Donald Trump has echoed other presidents in refusing to say what he
    would do.

    Zack Cooper, an Asia expert at the American Enterprise Institute, said:
    “It is very difficult to get allies to provide specifics about what they would do in a Taiwan conflict when they don’t know either the scenario’s context or America’s own response.”

    “President Trump has not committed to defend Taiwan, so it is
    unrealistic for the US to insist on clear commitments from others.”

    The push has been aimed at Japanese and Australian defence officials,
    and not higher levels. A second person said there was a “collective
    raising of eyebrows” from representatives in Japan, Australia and other
    US allies.

    Japan’s defence ministry said it was “difficult to answer the
    hypothetical question of a ‘Taiwan emergency’.” It said any response would “be implemented on an individual and specific basis in accordance
    with the constitution, international law, and domestic laws and
    regulations”.

    The Australian embassy in the US did not comment.

    Colby’s push follows other actions that have sparked anxiety. The
    Financial Times last month reported he was reviewing the Aukus security
    deal that will enable Canberra to procure nuclear-powered submarines.

    Colby has also urged European militaries to reduce their focus on the Indo-Pacific and focus more on the Euro-Atlantic region. The FT also
    reported recently that Japan cancelled a high-profile ministerial
    meeting with the US after Colby abruptly increased the US request for
    more defence spending.

    The Pentagon was forced to defend Colby in recent days after reports he
    was responsible for the decision to block weapons for Ukraine, which was shortly afterwards overturned by the president.

    But the debate about Taiwan planning comes as Tokyo and Canberra feel
    pressure from Trump to boost spending, which allies of Colby say is very important given the rising threat from China in the Indo-Pacific region.

    “We are coming to our allies in the Indo-Pacific, very similar to what
    the president did in Europe, and saying this is the threat environment,”
    said the US official. “Obviously, some of these are tough conversations, including on defence spending. But we think it will leave us all in a
    better place.”

    The official said the administration was confident that Japan and
    Australia would boost defence spending more quickly than European allies
    had.

    “We don’t think it should — nor can it — take 20 years. Not just because
    it is in our interests, but because it is so much in the Indo-Pacific
    allies’ interests as well.”

    The situation is particularly sensitive for Japan because the push for
    more spending — including one from Colby that was publicly rebuked by
    Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba — comes ahead of upper house elections on
    July 20.

    Recommended

    News in-depthAukus
    US sends a shot across the bows of its allies over submarine deal

    The official said the US understood that it had to be sensitive to the political considerations of allies.

    “That is something we all have to work through,” the official said. “It’s tough, but things simply must become fairer and more equitable for this to work — which it must. That is why we have leadership.”

    The official said the Pentagon had received “positive” indicators on
    higher spending from Japan and Australia, but stressed that it was
    “critical for us all that we see results”.

    Some allies believe Colby is ignoring their concerns in his pursuit for stronger deterrence. The official said that was “demonstrably untrue”.

    “We are investing tremendous amounts of time and energy to work with
    allies to find ways to address our shared challenges in ways that leave
    us both better off,” he said.

    Additional reporting by Leo Lewis in Tokyo

    Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025. All rights reserved.
    Reu

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)