• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBSRTogUmU6IFJFOiBSZTogVG9tbXkncyBGYW50YXNpZXM=?=

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 16 19:41:31 2024
    On Mon Sep 16 17:02:06 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 4:49 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 14:46:54 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 1:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 06:26:41 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 9/15/2024 8:58 AM, John B. wrote:
    Tommy seems to have some sort of "fixture" on NCO's (Staff, Tech, >>>>> Master Sergeant). He either didn't know or has forgotten that to be >>>>> promoted to those ranks you have to, among other accomplishments,
    taken and passed skill level tests in what ever skill you are assigned >>>>> to manage.

    There's also a time-in-grade requirement. Tommy was only in 4 years. No >>>> way he ever made it to even an E3, and even that's doubtful given his >>>> demonstrated incompetence.


    Based on Tommy's comments I would guess he had a skill lever rating of >>>>> "3" which would indicate that he had finished a technical school and >>>>> so was, in civilian term been appointed an "apprentice" skill level. >>>>> Next step up would be a "5 level" indicating that one had "journeyman" >>>>> skills and the more senior rank would be a "7 level"
    skill level, a "master", as high as you can go.





    Explain to us what you know about the service. It is automatic promotion from Airman Basic to A3C when you graduate basic training and automatic promotion when you graduate tech sxhool. What is this time in grade BS that you don't know anything
    about? You were too busy slithering around to know anything about the service,

    oh, my....You've never heard of time-in-grade?

    https://airforce.fastport.com/AF/advancement/Database?p%5BProfileID%5D=129&p%5Bv

    Airman Basic (E-1) is eligible for promotion to Airman (E-2) with
    six months' time-in-grade.
    E-2 is eligible for promotion to Airman First Class (E-3) with 10
    months' time-in-grade.
    E-3 is eligible for promotion to Senior Airman (E-4) within 18 to
    24 months' time-in-grade (depending on earlier promotions).

    Seems like Johnny may be right, you never _were_ in the airforce.


    --
    Add xx to reply





    I was in the service, You were avoiding it. Timr in service means NOTHING since it is so short that you hardly get done sewing on your new stripes and yuur eligible to upgrade.

    "Timr in service means NOTHING"....sure sparky. As soon as you get one promotion, your eligible for another, and another, and another....why,
    you were up for a Field commission before you left for guam!

    lol...sure, you served...


    But you still haven't told us what you know about the service.

    Actually, I did. I imagine you'll be in a fit of rage soon, posting a triggered message only a broken down old drunk could post.

    Did you join and get kiicked out for being queer?

    No matter how hard you harp on your homosexual fantasies for me, they
    will never materialize.

    Jutelist #1. Repeatedly accusing people of being "queer". He's a
    closeted queer, afraid people will find out.




    You were never in the service because if you can't pass their IQ test with at least 100, they will not accept you. As you've shown with your inability to perform your job, you cannot do anything let alone put SOS on someone's plate.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Wed Dec 18 08:44:17 2024
    On 12/16/2024 2:41 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 17:02:06 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 4:49 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 14:46:54 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 1:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 06:26:41 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 9/15/2024 8:58 AM, John B. wrote:
    Tommy seems to have some sort of "fixture" on NCO's (Staff, Tech, >>>>>>> Master Sergeant). He either didn't know or has forgotten that to be >>>>>>> promoted to those ranks you have to, among other accomplishments, >>>>>>> taken and passed skill level tests in what ever skill you are assigned >>>>>>> to manage.

    There's also a time-in-grade requirement. Tommy was only in 4 years. No >>>>>> way he ever made it to even an E3, and even that's doubtful given his >>>>>> demonstrated incompetence.


    Based on Tommy's comments I would guess he had a skill lever rating of >>>>>>> "3" which would indicate that he had finished a technical school and >>>>>>> so was, in civilian term been appointed an "apprentice" skill level. >>>>>>> Next step up would be a "5 level" indicating that one had "journeyman" >>>>>>> skills and the more senior rank would be a "7 level"
    skill level, a "master", as high as you can go.





    Explain to us what you know about the service. It is automatic promotion from Airman Basic to A3C when you graduate basic training and automatic promotion when you graduate tech sxhool. What is this time in grade BS that you don't know anything
    about? You were too busy slithering around to know anything about the service, >>>>
    oh, my....You've never heard of time-in-grade?

    https://airforce.fastport.com/AF/advancement/Database?p%5BProfileID%5D=129&p%5Bv

    Airman Basic (E-1) is eligible for promotion to Airman (E-2) with >>>> six months' time-in-grade.
    E-2 is eligible for promotion to Airman First Class (E-3) with 10 >>>> months' time-in-grade.
    E-3 is eligible for promotion to Senior Airman (E-4) within 18 to >>>> 24 months' time-in-grade (depending on earlier promotions).

    Seems like Johnny may be right, you never _were_ in the airforce.


    --
    Add xx to reply





    I was in the service, You were avoiding it. Timr in service means NOTHING since it is so short that you hardly get done sewing on your new stripes and yuur eligible to upgrade.

    "Timr in service means NOTHING"....sure sparky. As soon as you get one
    promotion, your eligible for another, and another, and another....why,
    you were up for a Field commission before you left for guam!

    lol...sure, you served...


    But you still haven't told us what you know about the service.

    Actually, I did. I imagine you'll be in a fit of rage soon, posting a
    triggered message only a broken down old drunk could post.

    Did you join and get kiicked out for being queer?

    No matter how hard you harp on your homosexual fantasies for me, they
    will never materialize.

    Jutelist #1. Repeatedly accusing people of being "queer". He's a
    closeted queer, afraid people will find out.

    You were never in the service because if you can't pass their IQ test with at least 100, they will not accept you.

    My ASVAB score told a very different story.

    As you've shown with your inability to perform your job,

    My performance reviews tell a very different story

    you cannot do anything let alone put SOS on someone's plate.

    Seems to me you're the one constantly trying to feed everyone else your bullshit.

    How's that new math demonstration showing how 226 EC votes for harris
    and 312 EC votes for trump is 25%/75%?


    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Kunich@21:1/5 to Zen Cycle on Wed Dec 18 20:07:11 2024
    On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:44:17 -0500, Zen Cycle wrote:

    On 12/16/2024 2:41 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 17:02:06 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 4:49 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 14:46:54 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 1:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 06:26:41 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 9/15/2024 8:58 AM, John B. wrote:
    Tommy seems to have some sort of "fixture" on NCO's (Staff,
    Tech, Master Sergeant). He either didn't know or has forgotten >>>>>>>> that to be promoted to those ranks you have to, among other
    accomplishments, taken and passed skill level tests in what ever >>>>>>>> skill you are assigned to manage.

    There's also a time-in-grade requirement. Tommy was only in 4
    years. No way he ever made it to even an E3, and even that's
    doubtful given his demonstrated incompetence.


    Based on Tommy's comments I would guess he had a skill lever
    rating of "3" which would indicate that he had finished a
    technical school and so was, in civilian term been appointed an >>>>>>>> "apprentice" skill level. Next step up would be a "5 level"
    indicating that one had "journeyman"
    skills and the more senior rank would be a "7 level"
    skill level, a "master", as high as you can go.





    Explain to us what you know about the service. It is automatic
    promotion from Airman Basic to A3C when you graduate basic training >>>>>> and automatic promotion when you graduate tech sxhool. What is this >>>>>> time in grade BS that you don't know anything about? You were too
    busy slithering around to know anything about the service,

    oh, my....You've never heard of time-in-grade?

    https://airforce.fastport.com/AF/advancement/Database? p%5BProfileID%5D=129&p%5Bv

    Airman Basic (E-1) is eligible for promotion to Airman (E-2)
    with
    six months' time-in-grade.
    E-2 is eligible for promotion to Airman First Class (E-3)
    with 10
    months' time-in-grade.
    E-3 is eligible for promotion to Senior Airman (E-4) within
    18 to
    24 months' time-in-grade (depending on earlier promotions).

    Seems like Johnny may be right, you never _were_ in the airforce.


    --
    Add xx to reply





    I was in the service, You were avoiding it. Timr in service means
    NOTHING since it is so short that you hardly get done sewing on your
    new stripes and yuur eligible to upgrade.

    "Timr in service means NOTHING"....sure sparky. As soon as you get one
    promotion, your eligible for another, and another, and another....why,
    you were up for a Field commission before you left for guam!

    lol...sure, you served...


    But you still haven't told us what you know about the service.

    Actually, I did. I imagine you'll be in a fit of rage soon, posting a
    triggered message only a broken down old drunk could post.

    Did you join and get kiicked out for being queer?

    No matter how hard you harp on your homosexual fantasies for me, they
    will never materialize.

    Jutelist #1. Repeatedly accusing people of being "queer". He's a
    closeted queer, afraid people will find out.

    You were never in the service because if you can't pass their IQ test
    with at least 100, they will not accept you.

    My ASVAB score told a very different story.

    As you've shown with your inability to perform your job,

    My performance reviews tell a very different story

    you cannot do anything let alone put SOS on someone's plate.

    Seems to me you're the one constantly trying to feed everyone else your bullshit.

    How's that new math demonstration showing how 226 EC votes for harris
    and 312 EC votes for trump is 25%/75%?

    Who exactly gives a shit. You steal from your employer because you can and withgy no other reason.

    You're not smart because it doesn't require a whole lot of intelligence to
    read a C++ program with the added notes saying what it does. And you could
    not even understand that. You're not an EE so stop trying to pass that BS
    off on us. You worked at QC at HP if you worked for them at all and either
    they fired you or the syren's call of a better title pulled y0ou away so
    that you could steal from someone else,

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to Tom Kunich on Thu Dec 19 07:06:08 2024
    On 12/18/2024 3:07 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:44:17 -0500, Zen Cycle wrote:

    On 12/16/2024 2:41 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 17:02:06 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 4:49 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 14:46:54 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 1:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 06:26:41 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 9/15/2024 8:58 AM, John B. wrote:
    Tommy seems to have some sort of "fixture" on NCO's (Staff, >>>>>>>>> Tech, Master Sergeant). He either didn't know or has forgotten >>>>>>>>> that to be promoted to those ranks you have to, among other
    accomplishments, taken and passed skill level tests in what ever >>>>>>>>> skill you are assigned to manage.

    There's also a time-in-grade requirement. Tommy was only in 4
    years. No way he ever made it to even an E3, and even that's
    doubtful given his demonstrated incompetence.


    Based on Tommy's comments I would guess he had a skill lever >>>>>>>>> rating of "3" which would indicate that he had finished a
    technical school and so was, in civilian term been appointed an >>>>>>>>> "apprentice" skill level. Next step up would be a "5 level"
    indicating that one had "journeyman"
    skills and the more senior rank would be a "7 level"
    skill level, a "master", as high as you can go.





    Explain to us what you know about the service. It is automatic
    promotion from Airman Basic to A3C when you graduate basic training >>>>>>> and automatic promotion when you graduate tech sxhool. What is this >>>>>>> time in grade BS that you don't know anything about? You were too >>>>>>> busy slithering around to know anything about the service,

    oh, my....You've never heard of time-in-grade?

    https://airforce.fastport.com/AF/advancement/Database?
    p%5BProfileID%5D=129&p%5Bv

    Airman Basic (E-1) is eligible for promotion to Airman (E-2) >>>>>> with
    six months' time-in-grade.
    E-2 is eligible for promotion to Airman First Class (E-3)
    with 10
    months' time-in-grade.
    E-3 is eligible for promotion to Senior Airman (E-4) within >>>>>> 18 to
    24 months' time-in-grade (depending on earlier promotions).

    Seems like Johnny may be right, you never _were_ in the airforce.


    --
    Add xx to reply





    I was in the service, You were avoiding it. Timr in service means
    NOTHING since it is so short that you hardly get done sewing on your >>>>> new stripes and yuur eligible to upgrade.

    "Timr in service means NOTHING"....sure sparky. As soon as you get one >>>> promotion, your eligible for another, and another, and another....why, >>>> you were up for a Field commission before you left for guam!

    lol...sure, you served...


    But you still haven't told us what you know about the service.

    Actually, I did. I imagine you'll be in a fit of rage soon, posting a
    triggered message only a broken down old drunk could post.

    Did you join and get kiicked out for being queer?

    No matter how hard you harp on your homosexual fantasies for me, they
    will never materialize.

    Jutelist #1. Repeatedly accusing people of being "queer". He's a
    closeted queer, afraid people will find out.

    You were never in the service because if you can't pass their IQ test
    with at least 100, they will not accept you.

    My ASVAB score told a very different story.

    As you've shown with your inability to perform your job,

    My performance reviews tell a very different story

    you cannot do anything let alone put SOS on someone's plate.

    Seems to me you're the one constantly trying to feed everyone else your
    bullshit.

    How's that new math demonstration showing how 226 EC votes for harris
    and 312 EC votes for trump is 25%/75%?

    Who exactly gives a shit.

    Those of us who have actually enjoyed math and used it on a regular
    basis, as well as those who have any intellectual curiosity. Are you
    retracting the claim now?

    You steal from your employer because you can and
    withgy no other reason.

    another completely nonsensical statement.


    You're not smart because it doesn't require a whole lot of intelligence to read a C++ program with the added notes saying what it does. And you could not even understand that.

    No, tommy, I understand it quite well, to the extent that it revealed
    your lack of understanding of the product. You weren't able to answer a
    simple architecture question, which should be straightforward for
    someone who allegedly wrote the code. If you wrote the code, you would
    have written the comment. IF you wrote the comment, you'd know it was
    there and why. Occam emerges victorious - you didn't write the code.

    You're not an EE so stop trying to pass that BS
    off on us.

    I'm guessing your the only one here who believes that. If anyone else
    does, feel free to chime in.

    You worked at QC at HP if you worked for them at all and either
    they fired you or the syren's call of a better title pulled y0ou away so
    that you could steal from someone else,

    No, tommy, I never worked in QC anywhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tom Kunich@21:1/5 to zen cycle on Tue Dec 24 18:36:02 2024
    On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:06:08 -0500, zen cycle wrote:

    On 12/18/2024 3:07 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:44:17 -0500, Zen Cycle wrote:

    On 12/16/2024 2:41 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 17:02:06 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 4:49 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 14:46:54 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 9/16/2024 1:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Mon Sep 16 06:26:41 2024 zen cycle wrote:
    On 9/15/2024 8:58 AM, John B. wrote:
    Tommy seems to have some sort of "fixture" on NCO's (Staff, >>>>>>>>>> Tech, Master Sergeant). He either didn't know or has forgotten >>>>>>>>>> that to be promoted to those ranks you have to, among other >>>>>>>>>> accomplishments, taken and passed skill level tests in what >>>>>>>>>> ever skill you are assigned to manage.

    There's also a time-in-grade requirement. Tommy was only in 4 >>>>>>>>> years. No way he ever made it to even an E3, and even that's >>>>>>>>> doubtful given his demonstrated incompetence.


    Based on Tommy's comments I would guess he had a skill lever >>>>>>>>>> rating of "3" which would indicate that he had finished a
    technical school and so was, in civilian term been appointed an >>>>>>>>>> "apprentice" skill level. Next step up would be a "5 level" >>>>>>>>>> indicating that one had "journeyman"
    skills and the more senior rank would be a "7 level"
    skill level, a "master", as high as you can go.





    Explain to us what you know about the service. It is automatic >>>>>>>> promotion from Airman Basic to A3C when you graduate basic
    training and automatic promotion when you graduate tech sxhool. >>>>>>>> What is this time in grade BS that you don't know anything about? >>>>>>>> You were too busy slithering around to know anything about the >>>>>>>> service,

    oh, my....You've never heard of time-in-grade?

    https://airforce.fastport.com/AF/advancement/Database?
    p%5BProfileID%5D=129&p%5Bv

    Airman Basic (E-1) is eligible for promotion to Airman
    (E-2)
    with
    six months' time-in-grade.
    E-2 is eligible for promotion to Airman First Class (E-3) >>>>>>> with 10
    months' time-in-grade.
    E-3 is eligible for promotion to Senior Airman (E-4)
    within 18 to
    24 months' time-in-grade (depending on earlier promotions).

    Seems like Johnny may be right, you never _were_ in the airforce. >>>>>>>

    --
    Add xx to reply





    I was in the service, You were avoiding it. Timr in service means
    NOTHING since it is so short that you hardly get done sewing on
    your new stripes and yuur eligible to upgrade.

    "Timr in service means NOTHING"....sure sparky. As soon as you get
    one promotion, your eligible for another, and another, and
    another....why,
    you were up for a Field commission before you left for guam!

    lol...sure, you served...


    But you still haven't told us what you know about the service.

    Actually, I did. I imagine you'll be in a fit of rage soon, posting
    a triggered message only a broken down old drunk could post.

    Did you join and get kiicked out for being queer?

    No matter how hard you harp on your homosexual fantasies for me,
    they will never materialize.

    Jutelist #1. Repeatedly accusing people of being "queer". He's a
    closeted queer, afraid people will find out.

    You were never in the service because if you can't pass their IQ test
    with at least 100, they will not accept you.

    My ASVAB score told a very different story.

    As you've shown with your inability to perform your job,

    My performance reviews tell a very different story

    you cannot do anything let alone put SOS on someone's plate.

    Seems to me you're the one constantly trying to feed everyone else
    your bullshit.

    How's that new math demonstration showing how 226 EC votes for harris
    and 312 EC votes for trump is 25%/75%?

    Who exactly gives a shit.

    Those of us who have actually enjoyed math and used it on a regular
    basis, as well as those who have any intellectual curiosity. Are you retracting the claim now?

    You steal from your employer because you can and withgy no other
    reason.

    another completely nonsensical statement.


    You're not smart because it doesn't require a whole lot of intelligence
    to read a C++ program with the added notes saying what it does. And you
    could not even understand that.

    No, tommy, I understand it quite well, to the extent that it revealed
    your lack of understanding of the product. You weren't able to answer a simple architecture question, which should be straightforward for
    someone who allegedly wrote the code. If you wrote the code, you would
    have written the comment. IF you wrote the comment, you'd know it was
    there and why. Occam emerges victorious - you didn't write the code.

    You're not an EE so stop trying to pass that BS off on us.

    I'm guessing your the only one here who believes that. If anyone else
    does, feel free to chime in.

    You worked at QC at HP if you worked for them at all and either they
    fired you or the syren's call of a better title pulled y0ou away so
    that you could steal from someone else,

    No, tommy, I never worked in QC anywhere.

    You are a liar, you got a fancy title that means nothing more than QC
    manager. why don't you give us the name of the company you work for and
    like your butt buddy, Liebermann I will verify that for the group.

    If you were here I would simply break both of your legs so that your
    claims of racing would fall on deaf ears.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Tom Kunich on Thu Dec 26 10:17:46 2024
    On 12/24/2024 1:36 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 07:06:08 -0500, zen cycle wrote:

    On 12/18/2024 3:07 PM, Tom Kunich wrote:
    On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 08:44:17 -0500, Zen Cycle wrote:


    Actually, I did. I imagine you'll be in a fit of rage soon, posting >>>>>> a triggered message only a broken down old drunk could post.

    Did you join and get kiicked out for being queer?

    No matter how hard you harp on your homosexual fantasies for me,
    they will never materialize.

    Jutelist #1. Repeatedly accusing people of being "queer". He's a
    closeted queer, afraid people will find out.

    You were never in the service because if you can't pass their IQ test >>>>> with at least 100, they will not accept you.

    My ASVAB score told a very different story.

    As you've shown with your inability to perform your job,

    My performance reviews tell a very different story

    you cannot do anything let alone put SOS on someone's plate.

    Seems to me you're the one constantly trying to feed everyone else
    your bullshit.

    How's that new math demonstration showing how 226 EC votes for harris
    and 312 EC votes for trump is 25%/75%?

    Who exactly gives a shit.

    Those of us who have actually enjoyed math and used it on a regular
    basis, as well as those who have any intellectual curiosity. Are you
    retracting the claim now?

    You steal from your employer because you can and withgy no other
    reason.

    another completely nonsensical statement.


    You're not smart because it doesn't require a whole lot of intelligence
    to read a C++ program with the added notes saying what it does. And you
    could not even understand that.

    No, tommy, I understand it quite well, to the extent that it revealed
    your lack of understanding of the product. You weren't able to answer a
    simple architecture question, which should be straightforward for
    someone who allegedly wrote the code. If you wrote the code, you would
    have written the comment. IF you wrote the comment, you'd know it was
    there and why. Occam emerges victorious - you didn't write the code.

    You're not an EE so stop trying to pass that BS off on us.

    I'm guessing your the only one here who believes that. If anyone else
    does, feel free to chime in.

    You worked at QC at HP if you worked for them at all and either they
    fired you or the syren's call of a better title pulled y0ou away so
    that you could steal from someone else,

    No, tommy, I never worked in QC anywhere.

    You are a liar, you got a fancy title that means nothing more than QC manager.

    no tommy, I don't manage QC. I manage international hazardous location compliance. I realize the implications of this are well beyond your
    grasp, so you'll simply have to take my word for it.

    why don't you give us the name of the company you work for and
    like your butt buddy, Liebermann I will verify that for the group.

    I've already given you my job title, several times. Try paying attention.


    If you were here I would simply break both of your legs

    Hey! It's Tommy tough guy!!

    so that your
    claims of racing would fall on deaf ears.

    So, you're claiming your fictional ability to break my legs somehow
    negates any claims of racing I've ever made......got it....



    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 12 17:34:16 2025
    On Thu Dec 26 10:17:46 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:


    No, tommy, I never worked in QC anywhere.

    You are a liar, you got a fancy title that means nothing more than QC manager.

    no tommy, I don't manage QC. I manage international hazardous location compliance. I realize the implications of this are well beyond your
    grasp, so you'll simply have to take my word for it.

    why don't you give us the name of the company you work for and
    like your butt buddy, Liebermann I will verify that for the group.

    I've already given you my job title, several times. Try paying attention.


    If you were here I would simply break both of your legs

    Hey! It's Tommy tough guy!!

    so that your
    claims of racing would fall on deaf ears.

    So, you're claiming your fictional ability to break my legs somehow
    negates any claims of racing I've ever made......got it....




    More from the QC manager with an inflated ego from a fancy title. You're not an EE and never were.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 12 17:20:26 2025
    On Mon Sep 16 06:26:41 2024 zen cycle wrote:

    There's also a time-in-grade requirement. Tommy was only in 4 years. No
    way he ever made it to even an E3, and even that's doubtful given his demonstrated incompetence.




    Where did you get your knowledge of the service Flunky? What service were you in? John passes off bullshit and you fall for it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to John B. on Thu Feb 13 16:09:34 2025
    On 2/12/2025 7:44 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:27:27 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon Sep 16 14:46:54 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:

    oh, my....You've never heard of time-in-grade?

    https://airforce.fastport.com/AF/advancement/Database?p%5BProfileID%5D=129&p%5Bv

    Airman Basic (E-1) is eligible for promotion to Airman (E-2) with
    six months' time-in-grade.
    E-2 is eligible for promotion to Airman First Class (E-3) with 10
    months' time-in-grade.
    E-3 is eligible for promotion to Senior Airman (E-4) within 18 to
    24 months' time-in-grade (depending on earlier promotions).

    Seems like Johnny may be right, you never _were_ in the airforce.




    When were you in the Air Force? Did you see in that reference you gave about passing a test? Being a
    Flunky has its disadvantages - you tend to be as stupid as a rock. Also, you cannot be promoted UNLESS there are openings for that grade. In four years my shop had ONE. He was given the promotion not by passing a "skills test" but by recommendation
    from the shop NCOIC. But then all of the time you spent in the service you already knew that didn't you?

    You are lying again. To be promoted you FIRST have to be qualified,
    which includes having passed the skill test, and have time in grade.
    The Shop Chief can only recommend. No opening for grades below
    Sergeant (3 stripes) are required. How do I know? Well I was a Shop
    Chief for a number of years :-)

    did that loser kunich actually respond yesterday to a post I made in
    september?

    wow, talk about having no life!


    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 16 23:39:32 2025
    On Thu Feb 13 07:44:39 2025 John B. wrote:

    You are lying again. To be promoted you FIRST have to be qualified,
    which includes having passed the skill test, and have time in grade.
    The Shop Chief can only recommend. No opening for grades below
    Sergeant (3 stripes) are required. How do I know? Well I was a Shop
    Chief for a number of years :-)




    John, you weren't IN the Air Force when an E4 was called a "sargeant" During your time it was Airman Basic, Airman 3rd Class, Airman 2nd Class and Airman 1st class. (E1, E2, E3 and E4)

    You never for one time were a shop chief for ANY technical grade so you don't know shit about advancement requirements. E2 to E3 didn't REQUIRE any ability tests and the ONE promotion our shop got four E4 didn't get a skill test. Of all of the E3's the
    shop chief CHOSE him. After my time in the Air Force, they might have changed it but you sure as hell wouldn't know anything about it since being a "shop chief" of crew chiefs didn't NEED any skills beyond being able to read and write.

    I'm sure that you could get Flunky who knows zip about it to agree with you because he did 2, 200 mile in-one-day rides despite having a less than 1,500 mile year. And he did that at an average speed that showed that he drove it in a car. You two deserve
    each other. He also told us that he was a racer and he is over 65 years old. And despite actual pro racers saying that they ALWAYS glanced down to shift friction shifters to see where the levers were - Flunky tells us that he never had to. Why he was 100
    times brighter than the best pro out there, just ask him.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 16 23:50:00 2025
    On Thu Feb 13 16:09:34 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 2/12/2025 7:44 PM, John B. wrote:
    On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 17:27:27 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon Sep 16 14:46:54 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:

    oh, my....You've never heard of time-in-grade?

    https://airforce.fastport.com/AF/advancement/Database?p%5BProfileID%5D=129&p%5Bv

    Airman Basic (E-1) is eligible for promotion to Airman (E-2) with >>> six months' time-in-grade.
    E-2 is eligible for promotion to Airman First Class (E-3) with 10 >>> months' time-in-grade.
    E-3 is eligible for promotion to Senior Airman (E-4) within 18 to >>> 24 months' time-in-grade (depending on earlier promotions).

    Seems like Johnny may be right, you never _were_ in the airforce.




    When were you in the Air Force? Did you see in that reference you gave about passing a test? Being a
    Flunky has its disadvantages - you tend to be as stupid as a rock. Also, you cannot be promoted UNLESS there are openings for that grade. In four years my shop had ONE. He was given the promotion not by passing a "skills test" but by recommendation
    from the shop NCOIC. But then all of the time you spent in the service you already knew that didn't you?

    You are lying again. To be promoted you FIRST have to be qualified,
    which includes having passed the skill test, and have time in grade.
    The Shop Chief can only recommend. No opening for grades below
    Sergeant (3 stripes) are required. How do I know? Well I was a Shop
    Chief for a number of years :-)

    did that loser kunich actually respond yesterday to a post I made in september?

    wow, talk about having no life!




    You certainly have a lot of guts to say that when no one can make a posting that 30 seconds later you haven't responded to. Tell us again about your boss approving of your complete lack of ever actually working.

    With the Department of Government Efficiency saving the taxpayers already above a half trillion dollars maybe your company will catch a clue and kick you out on your ass. Tell us again about how you did a couple of 200 mile days and then when that was so
    transparently impossible "even for you" you took them down.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 17 06:32:23 2025
    On Sun, 16 Feb 2025 23:39:32 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    I'm sure that you could get Flunky who knows zip about it to agree with you because he did 2, 200 mile in-one-day rides

    Let alone that I'd be interested to hear how you managed to link air
    force rank hierarchy to distance of bike rides, I'd also be interested
    to see a link to where I ever posted a 200 mile ride.

    despite having a less than 1,500 mile year. >

    2,847.1 mi in 2024, according to Strava

    And he did that at an average speed that showed that he drove it in a car.

    2,847.1 mi in 165h 18m is 17.2 Mph in 2024, according to Strava. Sorry
    sparky, I don't need a car to maintain a 17 MPH average.

    You two deserve each other. He also told us that he was a racer and he is over 65 years old.

    I never claimed I was over 65, I'm not.

    And despite actual pro racers saying that they ALWAYS glanced down to shift friction shifters to see where the levers were

    no, they didn't. Just because you're so inept that _you_ had to doesn't
    mean everyone else did.

    - Flunky tells us that he never had to.

    Everyone that responded to you in that discussion also said they never
    had to look down to shift. You're the _only_ person that has said it was necessary - It's your problem, no one elses.

    Why he was 100 times brighter than the best pro out there, just ask him.

    Here sparky, I'll help you out: I'm not smarter than a professional
    rider in any aspect of riding/racing bicycles. If I were, I might have
    at some point in my life advanced beyond a cat 3.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)