• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBGYXRhbCBpbmNpZGVudCBpbiBQYXJpcw==?=

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 3 23:47:36 2025
    On Mon Oct 21 17:03:08 2024 Shadow wrote:

    Ah, that explains it. Slocomb I mean.

    Still not what the government does with people that are unable
    to work.
    PS I also read that although Thailand claims it has a 1%
    unemployment rate, it considers people living at home in the rural
    districts as "fully employed". And those are almost 50% of the
    population. If they don't pay taxes and have no benefits from the
    government at all, and live on a sub-minimum wage, I'd call them "unemployed". But statistics accept anything...




    Well, you obviously have a working knowledge of statistics. So let's test it hopefully to the breaking point.

    Somewhere you said that Norway had a 10th of the Covid-19 deaths as Sweden. Let's look into that. Norway had the overwhelmingly worst Covid-19 policies of ALL of Europe. They were not welding the doors closed as they were doing in China but not very
    different. They had a total lockdown. So they had a VERY STRONG reason to show that their policy was effective. And I think that being able to say that your policies prevented 90% of the deaths registered elsewhere is a pretty convincing argument.

    The problem with it is that it s a total fabrication. This is demonstrated clearly by the fact that Norway had more excess deaths than Sweden per capital. Norway simply gave other causes for the excess deaths. If you put a person long term on a
    ventelator because they are having breathing problems they almost ALWAYS develop pneumonia as the ventelator will drive a virus into the lower lungs. Causing pneumonia.

    The vaccination rates in Norway and Sweden were about the same and pretty high. And deaths from Myo and Peri-carditis were high. Studies of autopsys of people who took mRNA injections had 80%!!!!!! of them had either white fibrous blood clots or "Grape
    Jelly" blood cloting which heretofor was only seen in patients on statins. They have not been able so far to tell what this white fibrous clotting is, but it ONLY appears in people with mRNA GMO's.

    What all of this means is that Norway did NOT have a lower rate of deaths from Covid-19, they simply put another name on the death DUE to covid-19.

    Inasmuch as you seem to have at least a bit of understandoing of Statistical Analysis. I hope this makes sense to you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 4 20:32:22 2025
    On Fri, 03 Jan 2025 23:47:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon Oct 21 17:03:08 2024 Shadow wrote:

    Ah, that explains it. Slocomb I mean.

    Still not what the government does with people that are unable
    to work.
    PS I also read that although Thailand claims it has a 1%
    unemployment rate, it considers people living at home in the rural
    districts as "fully employed". And those are almost 50% of the
    population. If they don't pay taxes and have no benefits from the
    government at all, and live on a sub-minimum wage, I'd call them
    "unemployed". But statistics accept anything...




    Well, you obviously have a working knowledge of statistics. So let's test it hopefully to the breaking point.

    Somewhere you said that Norway had a 10th of the Covid-19 deaths as Sweden.

    No, I never said that. I DID link to a good, solid medical
    article that showed how and why Sweden failed miserably to contain the pandemic. You probably got lost with all the pretty graphs....

    <https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8807990/>

    A pretty graph:

    <https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f47b/8807990/8a5b1a53fd9c/10.1177_14034948211047137-fig1.jpg>

    Sweden relied on "natural" immunity**. That didn't work
    anywhere on Earth,
    []'s

    ** until they didn't. Then they tried lockdowns, social distancing,
    mandatory vaccinations etc, but only after it was too late.




    Let's look into that. Norway had the overwhelmingly worst Covid-19 policies of ALL of Europe. They were not welding the doors closed as they were doing in China but not very different. They had a total lockdown. So they had a VERY STRONG reason to show
    that their policy was effective. And I think that being able to say that your policies prevented 90% of the deaths registered elsewhere is a pretty convincing argument.

    The problem with it is that it s a total fabrication. This is demonstrated clearly by the fact that Norway had more excess deaths than Sweden per capital. Norway simply gave other causes for the excess deaths. If you put a person long term on a
    ventelator because they are having breathing problems they almost ALWAYS develop pneumonia as the ventelator will drive a virus into the lower lungs. Causing pneumonia.

    The vaccination rates in Norway and Sweden were about the same and pretty high. And deaths from Myo and Peri-carditis were high. Studies of autopsys of people who took mRNA injections had 80%!!!!!! of them had either white fibrous blood clots or "Grape
    Jelly" blood cloting which heretofor was only seen in patients on statins. They have not been able so far to tell what this white fibrous clotting is, but it ONLY appears in people with mRNA GMO's.

    What all of this means is that Norway did NOT have a lower rate of deaths from Covid-19, they simply put another name on the death DUE to covid-19.

    Inasmuch as you seem to have at least a bit of understandoing of Statistical Analysis. I hope this makes sense to you.
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Shadow@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 5 18:46:22 2025
    On Sun, 05 Jan 2025 09:40:08 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 04 Jan 2025 20:32:22 -0300, Shadow <Sh@dow.br> wrote:

    On Fri, 03 Jan 2025 23:47:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon Oct 21 17:03:08 2024 Shadow wrote:

    Ah, that explains it. Slocomb I mean.

    Still not what the government does with people that are unable
    to work.
    PS I also read that although Thailand claims it has a 1%
    unemployment rate, it considers people living at home in the rural
    districts as "fully employed". And those are almost 50% of the
    population. If they don't pay taxes and have no benefits from the
    government at all, and live on a sub-minimum wage, I'd call them
    "unemployed". But statistics accept anything...

    Living at home in a rural area :-)

    Well using one family that I know well, they have some 8,000 sq meters
    of farm land, that's about 2.4 acres - or 1 hectare, and they raise >sufficient rice to feed their family - about 6 or 8 people - and have
    some left over to sell. In addition they raise the vegetables that
    they will eat and may even own a buffalo for the heavy work.
    In short they are self sufficient as far as living goes and some left
    over to spend.

    During the "off" season, between rice planting and harvesting the
    husband and wife come to "the big city" to work and are careful to
    find work as casual labor - the wife is my Housekeeper - where taxes
    are not collected.

    OH! I just asked my Housekeeper about taxes and she assured me that
    they do pay taxes on the home place - 1 year - 65 Baht, a bit less
    then US$2.00.

    As for government serves they, like all other Thai citizens, have
    totally free medical services. My Housekeeper told me that for 8
    monthly visits to the doctor and 3 days in the hospital giving birth
    was totally free.

    Are they "unemployed" ?

    No, they work and pay taxes so they are employed. There must
    be a lot of rural workers that do not own the land they live on and
    survive unregistered as "slave labor". Would they have the right to
    free medical service?
    PS In Brazil EVERYONE has free medical service, even tourists
    and unlawful extraterrestrials. It's in our Constitution.
    []'s
    --
    Don't be evil - Google 2004
    We have a new policy - Google 2012
    Google Fuchsia - 2021

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 6 17:32:12 2025
    On Sat Jan 4 20:32:22 2025 Shadow wrote:
    On Fri, 03 Jan 2025 23:47:36 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    On Mon Oct 21 17:03:08 2024 Shadow wrote:

    Ah, that explains it. Slocomb I mean.

    Still not what the government does with people that are unable
    to work.
    PS I also read that although Thailand claims it has a 1%
    unemployment rate, it considers people living at home in the rural
    districts as "fully employed". And those are almost 50% of the
    population. If they don't pay taxes and have no benefits from the
    government at all, and live on a sub-minimum wage, I'd call them
    "unemployed". But statistics accept anything...




    Well, you obviously have a working knowledge of statistics. So let's test it hopefully to the breaking point.

    Somewhere you said that Norway had a 10th of the Covid-19 deaths as Sweden.

    No, I never said that. I DID link to a good, solid medical
    article that showed how and why Sweden failed miserably to contain the pandemic. You probably got lost with all the pretty graphs....

    <https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8807990/>

    A pretty graph:

    <https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f47b/8807990/8a5b1a53fd9c/10.1177_14034948211047137-fig1.jpg>

    Sweden relied on "natural" immunity**. That didn't work
    anywhere on Earth,
    []'s

    ** until they didn't. Then they tried lockdowns, social distancing,
    mandatory vaccinations etc, but only after it was too late.




    Let's look into that. Norway had the overwhelmingly worst Covid-19 policies of ALL of Europe. They were not welding the doors closed as they were doing in China but not very different. They had a total lockdown. So they had a VERY STRONG reason to
    show that their policy was effective. And I think that being able to say that your policies prevented 90% of the deaths registered elsewhere is a pretty convincing argument.

    The problem with it is that it s a total fabrication. This is demonstrated clearly by the fact that Norway had more excess deaths than Sweden per capital. Norway simply gave other causes for the excess deaths. If you put a person long term on a
    ventelator because they are having breathing problems they almost ALWAYS develop pneumonia as the ventelator will drive a virus into the lower lungs. Causing pneumonia.

    The vaccination rates in Norway and Sweden were about the same and pretty high. And deaths from Myo and Peri-carditis were high. Studies of autopsys of people who took mRNA injections had 80%!!!!!! of them had either white fibrous blood clots or "
    Grape Jelly" blood cloting which heretofor was only seen in patients on statins. They have not been able so far to tell what this white fibrous clotting is, but it ONLY appears in people with mRNA GMO's.

    What all of this means is that Norway did NOT have a lower rate of deaths from Covid-19, they simply put another name on the death DUE to covid-19.

    Inasmuch as you seem to have at least a bit of understandoing of Statistical Analysis. I hope this makes sense to you.




    Say, Liebermann echo, there is only ONE important thing. Sweden had LOWER excess deaths per capita than Norway and they said that it was connected with Covid-19 or the mRNA vaccines when it was.

    Norway ONLY reported Covid-19 deaths when that was the ONLY cause of deaths. So death from the mRNA vaccines from Myocarditis or Pericarditis were not reported as from Covid-19 when in fact it was cardio swelling from the spike protein that came with the
    vaccine.

    Stop handing out bullshit like its candy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 6 12:33:50 2025
    On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 17:32:12 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Say, Liebermann echo,

    I'm honored.

    Sweden had LOWER excess deaths per capita than Norway and they said that it was connected with Covid-19 or the mRNA vaccines when it was.

    Norway ONLY reported Covid-19 deaths when that was the ONLY cause of deaths. So death from the mRNA vaccines from Myocarditis or Pericarditis were not reported as from Covid-19 when in fact it was cardio swelling from the spike protein that came with
    the vaccine.

    Stop handing out bullshit like its candy.

    Ummm... let's see who is really delivering bovine feces:

    "Excess mortality: Deaths from all causes compared to projection" <https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-projected-baseline?country=SWE~NOR>

    The chart shows the excess deaths from ALL causes, including your
    swollen ego, in Norway and Sweden since Jan 2020. Looks like Sweden
    had more excess deaths than Norway from Jan 2020 to Feb 24, 2021 and
    fewer excess deaths after that. In simple terms, you're wrong
    (again).

    Oddly, there are no numbers for 2024. Not sure yet why. This shows
    that the most recent updates for Sweden were on Aug 20, 2024: <https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-projected-baseline?time=2021-10-31..latest&facet=none&country=SWE%7ENOR#sources-and-processing>
    I'll see if I can figure out why the graph is missing 1 year later.

    Tom... if you don't have anything better to do, you can spend some
    time learning how to produce graphs using "Our World in Data" that
    demonstrates your amazing facts. Who knows what you might discover?

    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Tue Jan 7 20:53:45 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 1/6/2025 3:33 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 17:32:12 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Say, Liebermann echo,

    I'm honored.

    Sweden had LOWER excess deaths per capita than Norway and they said
    that it was connected with Covid-19 or the mRNA vaccines when it was.

    Norway ONLY reported Covid-19 deaths when that was the ONLY cause of
    deaths. So death from the mRNA vaccines from Myocarditis or
    Pericarditis were not reported as from Covid-19 when in fact it was
    cardio swelling from the spike protein that came with the vaccine.

    Stop handing out bullshit like its candy.

    Ummm... let's see who is really delivering bovine feces:

    "Excess mortality: Deaths from all causes compared to projection"
    <https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-projected-baseline?country=SWE~NOR>

    The chart shows the excess deaths from ALL causes, including your
    swollen ego, in Norway and Sweden since Jan 2020. Looks like Sweden
    had more excess deaths than Norway from Jan 2020 to Feb 24, 2021 and
    fewer excess deaths after that. In simple terms, you're wrong
    (again).

    Oddly, there are no numbers for 2024. Not sure yet why. This shows
    that the most recent updates for Sweden were on Aug 20, 2024:
    <https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-projected-baseline?time=2021-10-31..latest&facet=none&country=SWE%7ENOR#sources-and-processing>
    I'll see if I can figure out why the graph is missing 1 year later.

    Tom... if you don't have anything better to do, you can spend some
    time learning how to produce graphs using "Our World in Data" that
    demonstrates your amazing facts. Who knows what you might discover?

    Jeff, you need to learn the rules here - at least, the rules according
    to Tom. Tom does not need to provide any data, any links to data or any
    other references. What Tom posts is by definition correct.

    If others post references, links and data indicating Tom is wrong, then obviously that information is itself wrong.

    It's the "fake news" philosophy carried to the extreme.

    For some reason “Space Karen” is taking an interest in Uk and Tommy Roberson who is very definitely far right, as ever Musk is at best
    ill-formed.

    Lot of this comes back to the riots in the summer, which seems to have
    thrown such folks in that they expect to make false claims and to have
    public support, instead public turnout to repair Mosques and generally
    showed their disgust in them!

    Ie the far right political bubble had wake up call when it confronted with reality and for some folks who fell for it jail time.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Tue Jan 7 19:09:42 2025
    On 1/7/2025 3:53 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 1/6/2025 3:33 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 06 Jan 2025 17:32:12 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
    wrote:

    Say, Liebermann echo,

    I'm honored.

    Sweden had LOWER excess deaths per capita than Norway and they said
    that it was connected with Covid-19 or the mRNA vaccines when it was.

    Norway ONLY reported Covid-19 deaths when that was the ONLY cause of
    deaths. So death from the mRNA vaccines from Myocarditis or
    Pericarditis were not reported as from Covid-19 when in fact it was
    cardio swelling from the spike protein that came with the vaccine.

    Stop handing out bullshit like its candy.

    Ummm... let's see who is really delivering bovine feces:

    "Excess mortality: Deaths from all causes compared to projection"
    <https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-projected-baseline?country=SWE~NOR>

    The chart shows the excess deaths from ALL causes, including your
    swollen ego, in Norway and Sweden since Jan 2020. Looks like Sweden
    had more excess deaths than Norway from Jan 2020 to Feb 24, 2021 and
    fewer excess deaths after that. In simple terms, you're wrong
    (again).

    Oddly, there are no numbers for 2024. Not sure yet why. This shows
    that the most recent updates for Sweden were on Aug 20, 2024:
    <https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/excess-mortality-p-scores-projected-baseline?time=2021-10-31..latest&facet=none&country=SWE%7ENOR#sources-and-processing>
    I'll see if I can figure out why the graph is missing 1 year later.

    Tom... if you don't have anything better to do, you can spend some
    time learning how to produce graphs using "Our World in Data" that
    demonstrates your amazing facts. Who knows what you might discover?

    Jeff, you need to learn the rules here - at least, the rules according
    to Tom. Tom does not need to provide any data, any links to data or any
    other references. What Tom posts is by definition correct.

    If others post references, links and data indicating Tom is wrong, then
    obviously that information is itself wrong.

    It's the "fake news" philosophy carried to the extreme.

    For some reason “Space Karen” is taking an interest in Uk and Tommy Roberson who is very definitely far right, as ever Musk is at best ill-formed.

    Lot of this comes back to the riots in the summer, which seems to have
    thrown such folks in that they expect to make false claims and to have
    public support, instead public turnout to repair Mosques and generally
    showed their disgust in them!

    Ie the far right political bubble had wake up call when it confronted with reality and for some folks who fell for it jail time.

    Roger Merriman



    "space karen" lol...

    https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/496/630/814

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)