On Sat Jan 25 18:36:12 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 1/25/2025 3:45 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Thu Dec 5 20:22:37 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
If you wanted to talk about the cumulative inflation during Obama's
terms, you should have used the word "cumulative."
And even if you did, your claim of 25% [cumulative] inflation was off by >> nearly a factor of two. Do the numbers, Tom. They work out to about 14%. >>
Here's an interesting coincidence: If you run the numbers for cumulative >> inflation under G.W.Bush, immediately before Obama, you _do_ find a
cumulative value nearly twice as large as Obama's! (I get 24.4%.)
Oddly, Tom doesn't complain about the W.Bush years.
Krygowski, on a good day you're a fool.
As usual, Tom gets blown out of the water by mathematics so he descends
into insults.
Your math was totally wrong. Admit it and shut up.
Could it be any plainer why Frank failed as a plant engineer? And anytime you think you can shut me up, you coward, you're welcome to try.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)