On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:46:37 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
Will we next be entertained by a motion made by the "do goodies" to
charge the police with cruel and unusual punishment of the shooter?
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
On Fri Feb 7 10:46:37 2025 AMuzi wrote:
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
And another one down and another one down. Another one bites the dust! How did he get any guns as an illegal alien which the articloe failed to mention.
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 19:43:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri Feb 7 10:46:37 2025 AMuzi wrote:
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
And another one down and another one down. Another one bites the dust! How did he get any guns as an illegal alien which the articloe failed to mention.
The perp was born in San Francisco. A MAGA enthusiast. Was
psychotic. Oh, did I already imply that?
He thought that by killing the cannabis dispensary owner he
was helping "project 2025". More bibels, less drugs !!!!
There will be more attacks. Remember, even the mentally ill
can keep and bear arms in the land of the free.
[]'s
On 2/8/2025 4:33 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 19:43:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri Feb 7 10:46:37 2025 AMuzi wrote:
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
And another one down and another one down. Another one bites the dust! How did he get any guns as an illegal alien which the articloe failed to mention.
The perp was born in San Francisco. A MAGA enthusiast. Was
psychotic. Oh, did I already imply that?
He thought that by killing the cannabis dispensary owner he
was helping "project 2025". More bibels, less drugs !!!!
There will be more attacks. Remember, even the mentally ill
can keep and bear arms in the land of the free.
[]'s
That's actually true.
Since the 1970s, it's extremely difficult to abridge a
dangerously psychotic's rights in any way. Our culture has
decided they are better off sleeping outside on cardboard,
begging, self medicating, screaming at demons real or
imagined and wreaking various sorts of mayhem on the taxpayers.
Which, for what it's worth, leaves us yet with a lower
homicide rate than Brasil if that matters to you. (about 1:3
overall)
On Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:07:27 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/8/2025 4:33 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 19:43:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri Feb 7 10:46:37 2025 AMuzi wrote:
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
And another one down and another one down. Another one bites the dust! How did he get any guns as an illegal alien which the articloe failed to mention.
The perp was born in San Francisco. A MAGA enthusiast. Was
psychotic. Oh, did I already imply that?
He thought that by killing the cannabis dispensary owner he
was helping "project 2025". More bibels, less drugs !!!!
There will be more attacks. Remember, even the mentally ill
can keep and bear arms in the land of the free.
[]'s
That's actually true.
Since the 1970s, it's extremely difficult to abridge a
dangerously psychotic's rights in any way. Our culture has
decided they are better off sleeping outside on cardboard,
begging, self medicating, screaming at demons real or
imagined and wreaking various sorts of mayhem on the taxpayers.
Which, for what it's worth, leaves us yet with a lower
homicide rate than Brasil if that matters to you. (about 1:3
overall)
Brazil has been a right wing country for most of its history.
The strongest always prevails, though strongest usually means the one
with the bigger gun or the most bodyguards. Brazil has never had a
decent school system, and over 80% are illiterate(but counted as
literate if they can sign their names).
Our justice system is also right wing, and tends to jail the
poor and forgive the rich. Judges are not chosen by merit, it's by "tradition". Grandpa judge = father judge and son judge.
Absolute poverty+a sensation justice does not exist+massive
inequality = high crime rate.
The only time Brazil was NOT extreme right wing was during
Lula/Dilmas mandates. And even those would be considered right wing in Europe. Lula privatized, he never nationalized. He lowered taxes for
the poor, but never increased them for the rich, And yet the
international media labels him as "leftist". LOL.
Well, now we have Google re-classifying search results to
please governments, Meta and X spying on everyone and churning out
#FAKE_NEWS like it's a vitamin, criminals nominated to high positions,
and evangelical MFs deciding which parts of the bibel are pertinent to
their bank accounts and which are best ignored.
We'll have to rely on our memories and our morals for the next
few years.
[]'s
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula.
60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
On 2/8/2025 4:33 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 19:43:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri Feb 7 10:46:37 2025 AMuzi wrote:
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
And another one down and another one down. Another one bites the dust! How did he get any guns as an illegal alien which the articloe failed to mention.
The perp was born in San Francisco. A MAGA enthusiast. Was
psychotic. Oh, did I already imply that?
He thought that by killing the cannabis dispensary owner he
was helping "project 2025". More bibels, less drugs !!!!
There will be more attacks. Remember, even the mentally ill
can keep and bear arms in the land of the free.
[]'s
That's actually true.
Since the 1970s, it's extremely difficult to abridge a
dangerously psychotic's rights in any way. Our culture has
decided they are better off sleeping outside on cardboard,
begging, self medicating, screaming at demons real or
imagined and wreaking various sorts of mayhem on the taxpayers.
Which, for what it's worth, leaves us yet with a lower
homicide rate than Brasil if that matters to you. (about 1:3
overall)
On Sun Feb 9 09:07:27 2025 AMuzi wrote:
On 2/8/2025 4:33 PM, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 19:43:06 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Fri Feb 7 10:46:37 2025 AMuzi wrote:
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
And another one down and another one down. Another one bites the dust! How did he get any guns as an illegal alien which the articloe failed to mention.
The perp was born in San Francisco. A MAGA enthusiast. Was
psychotic. Oh, did I already imply that?
He thought that by killing the cannabis dispensary owner he
was helping "project 2025". More bibels, less drugs !!!!
There will be more attacks. Remember, even the mentally ill
can keep and bear arms in the land of the free.
[]'s
That's actually true.
Since the 1970s, it's extremely difficult to abridge a
dangerously psychotic's rights in any way. Our culture has
decided they are better off sleeping outside on cardboard,
begging, self medicating, screaming at demons real or
imagined and wreaking various sorts of mayhem on the taxpayers.
Which, for what it's worth, leaves us yet with a lower
homicide rate than Brasil if that matters to you. (about 1:3
overall)
Nothing matters to that "shadow" jackass than to lie about anything and everything as if he actually knew something. The Bazilian government is spending a lot of time seeking out the communists which is why this horses ass is hiding under a pseudonym.
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than any
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than any
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than any
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their population. I said that communism doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out troops toRussia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't understand.
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula.
60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people
employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal- with-mass-shootings/
On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023
under Lula.
60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime.
Give people
employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-
has-to-deal- with-mass-shootings/
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting- data/gun-violence-united-states-outlier
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report
much about American mass shootings. They're too common to be
interesting.
On 2/11/2025 7:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:The important point of the piece is the ineffectiveness of legislation
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula.
60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people
employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden- has-to-
deal- with-mass-shootings/
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting- data/gun-
violence-united-states-outlier
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report much about
American mass shootings. They're too common to be interesting.
across a wide range of policy and culture.
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than any
Russia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't understand.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their population. I said that communism doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out troops to
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-mean.html
same thing after all.
On 2/11/2025 9:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/11/2025 7:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:The important point of the piece is the ineffectiveness of legislation
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula.
60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people
employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden- has-to-
deal- with-mass-shootings/
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting- data/gun-
violence-united-states-outlier
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report much about
American mass shootings. They're too common to be interesting.
across a wide range of policy and culture.
Still! If legislation consistently causes a far lower number of bad >incidents, one exceptional incident doesn't prove the legislation was bad.
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:37:17 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 9:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/11/2025 7:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:The important point of the piece is the ineffectiveness of legislation
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula. >>>>>> 60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people >>>>>> employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden- has-to-
deal- with-mass-shootings/
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting- data/gun- >>>> violence-united-states-outlier
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report much about
American mass shootings. They're too common to be interesting.
across a wide range of policy and culture.
Still! If legislation consistently causes a far lower number of bad
incidents, one exceptional incident doesn't prove the legislation was bad.
That there might be lower numbers of bad incidents does not prove it
was caused by legislation.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S. there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
On 2/11/2025 9:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/11/2025 7:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:The important point of the piece is the ineffectiveness of
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023
under Lula.
60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime.
Give people
employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-
sweden- has-to- deal- with-mass-shootings/
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/
acting- data/gun- violence-united-states-outlier
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report
much about American mass shootings. They're too common to
be interesting.
legislation across a wide range of policy and culture.
Still! If legislation consistently causes a far lower number
of bad incidents, one exceptional incident doesn't prove the
legislation was bad.
Am 12.02.2025 um 10:32 schrieb Catrike Ryder:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:37:17 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 9:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:That there might be lower numbers of bad incidents does not prove it
On 2/11/2025 7:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:The important point of the piece is the ineffectiveness of legislation >>>> across a wide range of policy and culture.
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula. >>>>>>> 60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people >>>>>>> employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden- has-to- >>>>>> deal- with-mass-shootings/
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting- data/gun- >>>>> violence-united-states-outlier
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report much about
American mass shootings. They're too common to be interesting.
Still! If legislation consistently causes a far lower number of bad
incidents, one exceptional incident doesn't prove the legislation was bad. >>
was caused by legislation.
Sure, correlation is not causation. However, it is a storng indicator
that the legislation was not detrimental to reducing the number of
incidents because an "anti-causation" would break correlation.
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryderany other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than
to Russia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't understand.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their population. I said that communism doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out troops
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people" obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S. there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryderany other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than
to Russia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't understand.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their population. I said that communism doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out troops
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people" obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S. there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:43:09 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 10:54:01 +0100, Rolf Mantel
<news@hartig-mantel.de> wrote:
Am 12.02.2025 um 10:32 schrieb Catrike Ryder:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 21:37:17 -0500, Frank Krygowski
<frkrygow@gXXmail.com> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 9:28 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/11/2025 7:58 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 2/9/2025 11:46 AM, AMuzi wrote:The important point of the piece is the ineffectiveness of legislation >>>>>> across a wide range of policy and culture.
On 2/9/2025 9:55 AM, Shadow wrote:
PS There were 40.000 homicides in Brazil in 2023 under Lula. >>>>>>>>> 60.000 homicides in 2017 in the Temer/Bolsonaro regime. Give people >>>>>>>>> employment and salaries, they'll commit less crimes.
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden- has-to- >>>>>>>> deal- with-mass-shootings/
Hmm. Focusing on outliers yet again!
https://www.healthdata.org/news-events/insights-blog/acting- data/gun- >>>>>>> violence-united-states-outlier
I'd bet that Swedish news outlets never bother to report much about >>>>>>> American mass shootings. They're too common to be interesting.
Still! If legislation consistently causes a far lower number of bad
incidents, one exceptional incident doesn't prove the legislation was bad.
That there might be lower numbers of bad incidents does not prove it
was caused by legislation.
Sure, correlation is not causation. However, it is a storng indicator >>>that the legislation was not detrimental to reducing the number of >>>incidents because an "anti-causation" would break correlation.
It might have been something that happened in another country, like
perhaps they stopped allowing their thugs to come across the border.
Thailand solved the problem of illegal workers.
The law says that someone that hires illegal workers or assign legal
workers to unauthorized jobs. face fines of 10,000 to 100,000 baht per >worker. Repeat offenders risk up to a year in prison,
In current terms 10,000 baht, in Thailand, amounts to about 27 days at >minimum salary rates.
Needless to say there are few illegal workers here, which in turn
means that unemployment rates are very low.
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryderany other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder >>><Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education >>>>>>>>>>> system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally >>>>>>>>>>> ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each >>>>>>>>>>> one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific >>>>>>>>>>> issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than
to Russia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't understand.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other >>>>>>>>> country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their population. I said that communism doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out troops
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler at the top >>>>pulling strings and making sure all of the "people" obey the >>>>regulations and don't go around thinking that they might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S. there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still claiming to be a >>>democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off their political >>decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the best of the
bunch?
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryderany other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education >>>>>>>>>>> system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally >>>>>>>>>>> ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each >>>>>>>>>>> one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific >>>>>>>>>>> issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than
to Russia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't understand.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other >>>>>>>>> country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their population. I said that communism doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out troops
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people" obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S. there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off their political
decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the best of the
bunch?
On Thu, 13 Feb 2025 07:21:02 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>any other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>>
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>> wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education >>>>>>>>>>>> system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally >>>>>>>>>>>> ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each >>>>>>>>>>>> one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific >>>>>>>>>>>> issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than
troops to Russia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't understand.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other >>>>>>>>>> country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their population. I said that communism doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people" obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they might know what's >>>>> in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S. there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off their political
decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the best of the
bunch?
Look at the sad state of the country... 36 trillion dollars in debt.
--
C'est bon
Soloman
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryderany other system, as being a weak system because it isn't perfect.
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>>
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>> wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education >>>>>>>>>>> system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally >>>>>>>>>>> ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above.
We all have our preferred political environment. And each >>>>>>>>>>> one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific >>>>>>>>>>> issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster than
to Russia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't understand.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other >>>>>>>>> country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their population. I said that communism doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out troops
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people" obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S. there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off their political
decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the best of the
bunch?
On 2/12/2025 7:21 PM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B.
<slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-
shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy
education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of
mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the
above.
We all have our preferred political environment.
And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in
those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply
cannot work and ended their system. They
supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their
country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked
anywhere in the world does not stop believers in
communism from tauting its "advantages" or
complaining about the weaknessses of the free
enterprise system that made more people richer,
faster than any other system, as being a weak
system because it isn't perfect.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S.
then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon
fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that
the CCP is forced to look the other way while free
enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their
population. I said that communism doesn't work and
this plus North Korea renting out troops to Russia so
that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend
knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about
you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about
things you don't understand.
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese
characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-
does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-
mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler
at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people"
obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they
might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S.
there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still
claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off their
political
decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
yup, last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the
best of the
bunch?
The smart ones don't run for office.
On 2/13/2025 3:11 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 2/12/2025 7:21 PM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org>
wrote:
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun- shy-sweden- >>>>>>>>>>>>> has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy education >>>>>>>>>>>>> system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of mentally >>>>>>>>>>>>> ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the above. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
We all have our preferred political environment. And each >>>>>>>>>>>>> one of us is regularly disappointed. But in those specific >>>>>>>>>>>>> issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply cannot work >>>>>>>>>>>> and ended their system. They supposedly dropped to plain >>>>>>>>>>>> socialism but their country is not rich enough to afford >>>>>>>>>>>> real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked anywhere in the >>>>>>>>>>>> world does not stop believers in communism from tauting its >>>>>>>>>>>> "advantages" or complaining about the weaknessses of the >>>>>>>>>>>> free enterprise system that made more people richer, faster >>>>>>>>>>>> than any other system, as being a weak system because it >>>>>>>>>>>> isn't perfect.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S. then any other >>>>>>>>>>> country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon fiber
seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that the CCP is >>>>>>>> forced to look the other way while free enterprise is feeding a >>>>>>>> substancial portion of their population. I said that communism >>>>>>>> doesn't work and this plus North Korea renting out troops to
Russia so that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend
knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about you -
unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't
understand.
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What- does-path-of- >>>>>>> socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics- mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler at the top >>>>>> pulling strings and making sure all of the "people" obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they might know what's >>>>>> in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S. there seems to >>>>> be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off their political
decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
yup, last november is a classic example of morons re- electing a grifter.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the best of the
bunch?
The smart ones don't run for office.
"last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter."
I assume that's Kathy Hochul.
On 2/13/2025 3:11 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 2/12/2025 7:21 PM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B.
<slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-gun-
shy-sweden-has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy
education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse of
mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the
above.
We all have our preferred political environment.
And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in
those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply
cannot work and ended their system. They
supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their
country is not rich enough to afford real socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked
anywhere in the world does not stop believers in
communism from tauting its "advantages" or
complaining about the weaknessses of the free
enterprise system that made more people richer,
faster than any other system, as being a weak
system because it isn't perfect.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S.
then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon
fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that
the CCP is forced to look the other way while free
enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of their
population. I said that communism doesn't work and
this plus North Korea renting out troops to Russia so
that they can eat is just more proof. Your pretend
knowledge of economics is like everytthing else about
you - unadulterated bullshit. Stop talking about
things you don't understand.
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese
characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-
does-path-of-socialism-with-Chinese-characteristics-
mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful ruler
at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people"
obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they
might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S.
there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still
claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off their
political
decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
yup, last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the
best of the
bunch?
The smart ones don't run for office.
"last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter."
I assume that's Kathy Hochul.
On 2/13/2025 5:35 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/13/2025 3:11 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 2/12/2025 7:21 PM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B.
<slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-
gun- shy-sweden- has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy
education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse
of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the
above.
We all have our preferred political
environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in
those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply
cannot work and ended their system. They
supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their
country is not rich enough to afford real
socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked
anywhere in the world does not stop believers
in communism from tauting its "advantages" or
complaining about the weaknessses of the free
enterprise system that made more people richer,
faster than any other system, as being a weak
system because it isn't perfect.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S.
then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon
fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that
the CCP is forced to look the other way while free
enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of
their population. I said that communism doesn't
work and this plus North Korea renting out troops
to Russia so that they can eat is just more proof.
Your pretend knowledge of economics is like
everytthing else about you - unadulterated
bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't
understand.
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese
characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-
does-path-of- socialism-with-Chinese-
characteristics- mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful
ruler at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people"
obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they
might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S.
there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still
claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off
their political
decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
yup, last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the
best of the
bunch?
The smart ones don't run for office.
"last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter."
I assume that's Kathy Hochul.
yeah...sure...<eyeroll>
On Fri, 14 Feb 2025 07:51:01 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/13/2025 5:00 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 2/13/2025 5:35 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/13/2025 3:11 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 2/12/2025 7:21 PM, John B. wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 09:15:02 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 18:06:16 +0700, John B.
<slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 03:46:35 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Feb 2025 18:45:58 -0600, AMuzi
<am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/11/2025 3:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Tue Feb 11 08:49:50 2025 John B. wrote:
On Mon, 10 Feb 2025 20:15:35 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 10 07:28:25 2025 John B. wrote:
On Sun, 09 Feb 2025 21:51:22 GMT, cyclintom
<cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sun Feb 9 10:46:23 2025 AMuzi wrote:
From today's paper:
https://nypost.com/2025/02/08/opinion/even-
gun- shy-sweden- has-to-deal-with-mass-shootings/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Many of the failures we share (miserably lousy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> education
system, homicides and assaults, abject abuse
of mentally
ill) defy simple analysis as noted well in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> above.
We all have our preferred political
environment. And each
one of us is regularly disappointed. But in
those specific
issues results cross all political lines.
The Russians discovered that communism simply
cannot work and ended their system. They
supposedly dropped to plain socialism but their
country is not rich enough to afford real
socialism.
But the fact that communism has NEVER worked
anywhere in the world does not stop believers
in communism from tauting its "advantages" or
complaining about the weaknessses of the free
enterprise system that made more people richer,
faster than any other system, as being a weak
system because it isn't perfect.
You mean China - who sell more stuff to the U.S.
then any other
country doesn't work? Or Vietnam doesn't work?
They are both classified as communist.
Everyone got this now, the CCP is selling carbon
fiber seatposts to America.
And some $562.9 billion worth of other stuff.
John, China is in such a bad economic position that
the CCP is forced to look the other way while free
enterprise is feeding a substancial portion of
their population. I said that communism doesn't
work and this plus North Korea renting out troops
to Russia so that they can eat is just more proof.
Your pretend knowledge of economics is like
everytthing else about you - unadulterated
bullshit. Stop talking about things you don't
understand.
Well, nothing has changed.
Now it's called 'capitalism with chinese
characteristics'.
https://www.cgtn.com/how-china-works/feature/What-
does-path-of- socialism-with-Chinese-
characteristics- mean.html
same thing after all.
All forms of collectivism require a rich powerful
ruler at the top
pulling strings and making sure all of the "people"
obey the
regulations and don't go around thinking that they
might know what's
in their own best interest.
Well, "free" money has a great allure and in the U.S.
there seems to
be a considerable amount of it. The U.S. is still
claiming to be a
democratic government, is it not?
Sadly, we have career politicians who get rich off
their political
decisions and we have morons who keep re-electing them.
yup, last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter.
Ever stop to think the ones that get elected may be the
best of the
bunch?
The smart ones don't run for office.
"last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter."
I assume that's Kathy Hochul.
yeah...sure...<eyeroll>
https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2022/03/30/where-hochul-money-bills-stadium-came-from/7216477001/
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/buffalo-bills-stadium-hochul/
But, hey, The People have spoken.
"a new housing voucher program for the homeless and economic
assistance for undocumented immigrants."A really great plan.
On 2/14/2025 8:51 AM, AMuzi wrote:
On 2/13/2025 5:00 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
On 2/13/2025 5:35 PM, AMuzi wrote:
"last november is a classic example of morons re-
electing a grifter."
I assume that's Kathy Hochul.
yeah...sure...<eyeroll>
https://www.democratandchronicle.com/story/news/2022/03/30/where-
hochul- money-bills-stadium-came-from/7216477001/
https://www.thenation.com/article/politics/buffalo-bills-stadium-hochul/
But, hey, The People have spoken.
It takes real dedication to ignore the much, much more obvious example.
On Fri, 7 Feb 2025 10:46:37 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
with action video
https://nypost.com/2025/02/07/us-news/terrifying-moment-san-francisco-store-owner-is-shot-seven-times-at-point-blank-range-in-random-attack/
Will we next be entertained by a motion made by the "do goodies" to
charge the police with cruel and unusual punishment of the shooter?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 497 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 67:28:40 |
| Calls: | 9,766 |
| Calls today: | 7 |
| Files: | 13,745 |
| Messages: | 6,185,945 |