Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government? If youweren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government? If
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023: <https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk> <https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all
of them.
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government? If
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all
of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment? Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable toafford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he released one document that agreed with the Warren Commission.
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
On 2/18/2025 10:19 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it
interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that
Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports
Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the
government? If you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned
for?
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023> I'm sure
there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all
of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you
comment? Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the
actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out
lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable
to afford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he
released one document that agreed with the Warren Commission.
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question
of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and
Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
It's early to this story.
Let's see what is released, what is yet redacted and what is
withheld before we jump to conclusions.
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government? If
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all
of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment? Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy
which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied.
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government? If
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all
of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment?
Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable to afford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he released onedocument that agreed with the Warren Commission.
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:19:25 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
wrote:
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government? If
document that agreed with the Warren Commission.
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all
of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment?
It's amazing how you borrow some of my tag lines. I comment to ruin
your credibility and trust in RBT. When nobody believe you, I have accomplished my goal. As for feeling good, you lie, insult and
fabricate events in RBT in order to demean anyone who dares to post
something that fails to match your agenda of the day. You seem to
believe that by belittling someone else, you raise your perceived
importance or somehow reinforce your talking points. It doesn't work
that way. I could be evil personified and you would still be wrong.
Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable to afford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he released one
Searching with Google found no such things. Got any links to this
document release?
Incidentally, I did find this:
"FBI says it found 2,400 new JFK assassination records" (Feb 12,
2025) <https://apnews.com/article/jfk-fbi-trump-newly-discovered-files-0bd8ad5569f5fa3ed92b8ee9b795c9e7>
Did you really mean 24,000 or was it 2,400?
According to the above article, there are millions of documents just
waiting to be declassified:
"Trump has promised again to release the last JFK files. But experts
say don’t expect big revelations" (Nov 21, 2024) <https://apnews.com/article/jfk-assassination-documents-release-trump-50ea62770b13f0ffc11ca18dde03500d>
"...those who have studied the records released so far say that even
if the remaining files are declassified, the public shouldn’t
anticipate any earth-shattering revelations."
Free advice. Don't hold your breath.
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
You might be right about my brain. Why I bother to respond to you
isn't very rational. But, since fooling you using your own words as
evidence is so easy, it doesn't burn much time or effort. I should
just ignore you and do something useful instead.
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:27:14 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
On 2/18/2025 10:19 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government? If
afford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he released one document that agreed with the Warren Commission.
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all >>>> of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment? Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable to
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
It's early to this story.
Let's see what is released, what is yet redacted and what is
withheld before we jump to conclusions.
Well, you can be sure that if the papers don't match what this guy or
that guy thinks they should then the argument will be that there must
be even more hidden records and they should be released also.
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/sTGk0ENtVjA/m/70nDjoX7rCkJOn Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:20:12 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com> wrote:If you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 04:02:42 -0500, Catrike Ryder
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 08:27:24 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:27:14 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/18/2025 10:19 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government?
to afford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he released one document that agreed with the Warren Commission.
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all >>>>>> of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment? Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
It's early to this story.
Let's see what is released, what is yet redacted and what is
withheld before we jump to conclusions.
Well, you can be sure that if the papers don't match what this guy or >>>that guy thinks they should then the argument will be that there must
be even more hidden records and they should be released also.
I'm not execting anything earthshattering. Such secrets as that tend
to find their way to the surface.
Before we went to the Enewetak atomic tests and as part of the get
ready training we were brief on classified information.
It seems that anyone in position of authority can classify
information but de-classifying it is a bit more complicated as there
has to be a study made to determine whether the information is still
secret so in most cases information once classified secret, or
whatever, just stays classified.
In our case we were told that anything you see, hear, or do here is >classified and is secret until we tell you different... and they have
never done that.
So a president's secret papers may be actual secrets or just that he
had a bowel movement on Friday morning :-)
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 04:02:42 -0500, Catrike RyderIf you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
<Soloman@old.bikers.org> wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 08:27:24 +0700, John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 10:27:14 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/18/2025 10:19 AM, cyclintom wrote:
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government?
to afford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he released one document that agreed with the Warren Commission.
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all >>>>>> of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment? Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
It's early to this story.
Let's see what is released, what is yet redacted and what is
withheld before we jump to conclusions.
Well, you can be sure that if the papers don't match what this guy or
that guy thinks they should then the argument will be that there must
be even more hidden records and they should be released also.
I'm not execting anything earthshattering. Such secrets as that tend
to find their way to the surface.
Before we went to the Enewetak atomic tests and as part of the get
ready training we were brief on classified information.
It seems that anyone in position of authority can classify
information but de-classifying it is a bit more complicated as there
has to be a study made to determine whether the information is still
secret so in most cases information once classified secret, or
whatever, just stays classified.
In our case we were told that anything you see, hear, or do here is classified and is secret until we tell you different... and they have
never done that.
So a president's secret papers may be actual secrets or just that he
had a bowel movement on Friday morning :-)
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:19:25 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
wrote:
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government? If
document that agreed with the Warren Commission.
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all
of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment?
It's amazing how you borrow some of my tag lines. I comment to ruin
your credibility and trust in RBT. When nobody believe you, I have accomplished my goal. As for feeling good, you lie, insult and
fabricate events in RBT in order to demean anyone who dares to post
something that fails to match your agenda of the day. You seem to
believe that by belittling someone else, you raise your perceived
importance or somehow reinforce your talking points. It doesn't work
that way. I could be evil personified and you would still be wrong.
Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable to afford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he released one
Searching with Google found no such things. Got any links to this
document release?
Incidentally, I did find this:
"FBI says it found 2,400 new JFK assassination records" (Feb 12,
2025) <https://apnews.com/article/jfk-fbi-trump-newly-discovered-files-0bd8ad5569f5fa3ed92b8ee9b795c9e7>
Did you really mean 24,000 or was it 2,400?
According to the above article, there are millions of documents just
waiting to be declassified:
"Trump has promised again to release the last JFK files. But experts
say don?t expect big revelations" (Nov 21, 2024) <https://apnews.com/article/jfk-assassination-documents-release-trump-50ea62770b13f0ffc11ca18dde03500d>
"...those who have studied the records released so far say that even
if the remaining files are declassified, the public shouldn?t
anticipate any earth-shattering revelations."
Free advice. Don't hold your breath.
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
You might be right about my brain. Why I bother to respond to you
isn't very rational. But, since fooling you using your own words as
evidence is so easy, it doesn't burn much time or effort. I should
just ignore you and do something useful instead.
I'm not execting anything earthshattering. Such secrets as that tend
to find their way to the surface.
" Ruby died from a pulmonary embolism shortly after being
diagnosed with cancer."
from:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jack-Ruby
On Wed Feb 19 04:02:42 2025 Catrike Ryder wrote:
I'm not execting anything earthshattering. Such secrets as that tend
to find their way to the surface.
The papers are quit explicit. JFK relalized that the CIA had lied to him about Vietnam - there WAS no movement for a free enterprise system there. Most of Vietnam didn't care what government they had and Communism sounded better to them as it does toShadow. The CIA was doing nothing more than they did all over the world in the last 70 years: start wars to profit the weapons industry. Kennedy was going to pull the US military including the military advisors out of Vietnam.
The CIA first enlisted Cuban Castroites too kill Kennedy since they were more than pissed off from the failed Bay of Pigs invasion effort. The CIA simply told them that it was Kennedy's idea.assassination.) by being shot in the back at close range. It is EASY to tell the exact range since anything closer than 10 feet leaves unmistakeable traces. In RFK's case the gun was pressed into his back. The details are too ugly to describe,
Since only 45% of the public believed the Warren Commision I wouldn't sau that the newly released papers would be earthshattering.
But RFK Jr. has said MANY times that Sirhan Sirhan did NOT kill his father - that like all fools with a gun he missed with every shot and his father was killed (Remember, at the time RFK was attorney General who could open a case about his brother's
It also appears that the CIA was involved in the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King. Why that SOB was preaching PEACE. The CIA couldn't have that. Even when I was in Guam, the CIA was running drugs out of Laos using military aircraft that theywould park far away from our bombers. Ground crews would tell us what was going on.
On Wed Feb 19 12:21:38 2025 AMuzi wrote:
" Ruby died from a pulmonary embolism shortly after being
diagnosed with cancer."
from:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jack-Ruby
You can believe that or you can believe the declassified papers that say that the CIA enlisted the Mafia to assassinate Ruby.
Do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein hung himself?
On 2/19/2025 12:46 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Feb 19 12:21:38 2025 AMuzi wrote:
" Ruby died from a pulmonary embolism shortly after being
diagnosed with cancer."
from:
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Jack-Ruby
You can believe that or you can believe the declassified papers that say that the CIA enlisted the Mafia to assassinate Ruby.
Do you believe that Jeffrey Epstein hung himself?
No one believes Epstein hanged himself.
There's no conflict in believing that Mr Ruby was contracted
for the Oswald hit by his mob patron Carlos Marcella, by
Hoffa fixer Robert Baker, by the CIA or some combination
thereof and also believing he died of complications of lung
cancer in prison.
At any rate, I'm happy to wait for however long this fresh
disclosure process takes. Disclosure is well overdue.
Kennedy autopsy report released to the public 27th December
2009
<https://www.autopsyfiles.org/reports/Other/kennedy,%20john_report.pdf>
(use wget or curl with appropriate command line to retrieve
date document was released)
Authorized by your favorite President, his Highness and
Excellency Barack Obama, the one with the record Stock Exchange gains.
The photos were released by his Highness and Excellency
President Biden:
<https://ia801207.us.archive.org/zip_dir.php?path=/33/items/Kennedy_autopsy_gallery.zip>
Again, check the date (2024 - wget won't work).
If your anti-virus is blocking the Internet again, you'll just
have to trust me on this.
You're too old to be taken in by con men like Trump. Act your
age.
which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied.
LOL. So now you invented autopsies?
JFK autopsy results showed a basebsll sized hole in the back of his head
Most of Vietnam didn't care what government they had and Communism sounded better to them as it does to Shadow.
On Tue Feb 18 14:26:43 2025 Shadow wrote:
Kennedy autopsy report released to the public 27th December
2009
<https://www.autopsyfiles.org/reports/Other/kennedy,%20john_report.pdf>
(use wget or curl with appropriate command line to retrieve
date document was released)
Authorized by your favorite President, his Highness and
Excellency Barack Obama, the one with the record Stock Exchange gains.
The photos were released by his Highness and Excellency
President Biden:
<https://ia801207.us.archive.org/zip_dir.php?path=/33/items/Kennedy_autopsy_gallery.zip>
Again, check the date (2024 - wget won't work).
If your anti-virus is blocking the Internet again, you'll just
have to trust me on this.
You're too old to be taken in by con men like Trump. Act your
age.
which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied.
LOL. So now you invented autopsies?
Frankly, I wouldn't trust you with a nickel.
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:01:52 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
By the way Liebermann, yesterday I got another tax
information from Stel: I just made another %30,000 profit on another
sale of stock. That puts me over $1.1 Million.
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:01:52 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>If you weren't a crimanal what were you pardoned for?
wrote:
On Tue Feb 18 10:04:05 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2025 16:19:25 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Mon Feb 17 11:54:56 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:09:14 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
Now that Trump declassified the JFK papers don't you find it interesting that I was 150% right? Isn't it time that Liebermann says that I am wrong again as that POS supports Biden giving pardons to every criminal in the or around the government?
document that agreed with the Warren Commission.
Biden release quite a few documents between 2017 and 2023:
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk>
<https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/release2023>
I'm sure there will be more. Let me know when you're done reading all >> >> of them.
It must make you feel good to be stupid or else why would you comment?
It's amazing how you borrow some of my tag lines. I comment to ruin
your credibility and trust in RBT. When nobody believe you, I have
accomplished my goal. As for feeling good, you lie, insult and
fabricate events in RBT in order to demean anyone who dares to post
something that fails to match your agenda of the day. You seem to
believe that by belittling someone else, you raise your perceived
importance or somehow reinforce your talking points. It doesn't work
that way. I could be evil personified and you would still be wrong.
Trump declassified 24,000 documents including the actual autopsy which shows that the Warren Commission flat out lied. But you want to tell us that the man who made you unable to afford a loaf of bread was better than Trump because he released one
Searching with Google found no such things. Got any links to this
document release?
Incidentally, I did find this:
"FBI says it found 2,400 new JFK assassination records" (Feb 12,
2025)
<https://apnews.com/article/jfk-fbi-trump-newly-discovered-files-0bd8ad5569f5fa3ed92b8ee9b795c9e7>
Did you really mean 24,000 or was it 2,400?
According to the above article, there are millions of documents just
waiting to be declassified:
"Trump has promised again to release the last JFK files. But experts
say don?t expect big revelations" (Nov 21, 2024)
<https://apnews.com/article/jfk-assassination-documents-release-trump-50ea62770b13f0ffc11ca18dde03500d>
"...those who have studied the records released so far say that even
if the remaining files are declassified, the public shouldn?t
anticipate any earth-shattering revelations."
Free advice. Don't hold your breath.
You simply do not have a working brain and there is a question of whether it ever did. You can fool Roger, Flunky and Krygowski because they are so biased but not me.
You might be right about my brain. Why I bother to respond to you
isn't very rational. But, since fooling you using your own words as
evidence is so easy, it doesn't burn much time or effort. I should
just ignore you and do something useful instead.
the "gunman on the grassy knoll" in the head. The Warren Commision were utter liars. Some excuse them saying that the information was coming from the FBI who did not want the real murderers caught. J. Edgar Hoover hated JFK and actually went to the horseThe 2400 pages of JFK papres were do to be declassified in 1997 or 2007 at the lkatest. They actually show the autopsy results and there is no question that he weas hit high on the back probably by Lee Harvey Oswald and he was hit from the front from
and
certainbly not with a gun. Ruby later turned up having hung himself (shades of Jeffrey Epstein.)
JFK autopsy results showed a basebsll sized hole in the back of his head - proving that he had been shot in the head from the front. The Oswaldshot had been a nn-lethal strike high on the back of JFK's right side
chest.
Wrong again.
The autopsy of John F. Kennedy, the 35th president of the United
States, was performed at the Bethesda Naval Hospital in Bethesda,
Maryland. The autopsy began at about 8 p.m. Eastern Standard Time
(EST) on November 22, 1963?the day of Kennedy's assassination?and
ended in the early morning of November 23, 1963. The choice of autopsy hospital in the Washington, D.C. area was made by his widow, First
Lady Jacqueline Kennedy, who chose the Bethesda as President Kennedy
had been a naval officer during World War II.
The autopsy found that Kennedy was hit by two bullets. One entered his
upper back and exited below his neck, albeit obscured by a
tracheotomy. The other bullet struck Kennedy in the back of his head
and exited the front of his skull in a large exit wound. The
trajectory of the latter bullet was marked by bullet fragments
throughout his brain.
n 1968, U.S. Attorney General Ramsey Clark organized a medical panel
to examine the autopsy's photographs and X-rays. The panel concurred
with the Warren Commission's conclusion that Kennedy was killed by two
shots from behind.
Now we have that geniuses among electronics engineers, Jeffrey Liebermann telling us that all of these just declassified
papers are lies. He knows this because he is on welfare and welfare
queens know everything.
By the way Liebermann, yesterday I got another taxinformation from Stel: I just made another %30,000 profit on another
sale of stock. That puts me over $1.1 Million.
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:01:52 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
By the way Liebermann, yesterday I got another tax
information from Stel: I just made another %30,000 profit on another
sale of stock. That puts me over $1.1 Million.
Liar
Ever since I started posting in this forum in 2019, tommy has claimed to
have $1M in investments, and makes claims that he has monthly returns of anywhere between $10K to $14K. If we split the difference this gives him
a rather astonishing annual return of 14.4%.
We also know that tommy claims he's saving the money, implying that he's actually re-investing the money.
Let's do some quick math:
Starting with a $1M investment in 2019, an annual return of 14%, and reinvesting the growth yields, tommy _should_ have over $3M by now.
Even if he wasn't re-investing and moving the interest into a more
modest financial storage tool, he'd have over $2M
So, either he's lying, or...tommy, is your wife stealing your
money....AGAIN?
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:01:52 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
JFK autopsy results showed a basebsll sized hole in the back of his head
Where exactly does it say that in the autopsy?
You can send me links. I have no use for anti-viruses(which
are really spyware).
TIA
Who was sitting directly in front of Kennedy and was also hit
by the SAME shot(s)? Less seriously, because the bullets had lost most
of their energy.
Just wondering.
On Wed Feb 19 17:30:38 2025 Shadow wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:01:52 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
JFK autopsy results showed a basebsll sized hole in the back of his head
Where exactly does it say that in the autopsy?
You can send me links. I have no use for anti-viruses(which
are really spyware).
TIA
Who was sitting directly in front of Kennedy and was also hit
by the SAME shot(s)? Less seriously, because the bullets had lost most
of their energy.
Just wondering.
The papers on the actual JFK assassination was only released recently when President Trump came in and took the seurity clearance off of it. What have you been reading that bullshit lying Warren Report?
On 7/31/2025 5:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Feb 19 17:30:38 2025 Shadow wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:01:52 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
JFK autopsy results showed a basebsll sized hole in the back of his head >>>Where exactly does it say that in the autopsy?
You can send me links. I have no use for anti-viruses(which
are really spyware).
TIA
Who was sitting directly in front of Kennedy and was also hit
by the SAME shot(s)? Less seriously, because the bullets had lost most
of their energy.
Just wondering.
The papers on the actual JFK assassination was only released recently when President Trump came in and took the seurity clearance off of it. What have you been reading that bullshit lying Warren Report?
I don't know what actually happened, but the Warren Report
is mostly obfuscation and misdirection.
Then again, any agency worth it's salt* (FBI, CIA, NSA, the
various military intelligence services and probably
political party factota as well) have spent the past 60
years removing, editing, adding and generally spoliating
whatever remains in various files.
p.s. I strongly doubt that, even given the above, everything
extant has been released. Ditto for the other two notable
1960s assassinations.
*assassinating a President is actually complex and
difficult. Document tampering is relatively easy; even Sandy
Berger...
On Thu, 31 Jul 2025 17:41:04 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 7/31/2025 5:04 PM, cyclintom wrote:
On Wed Feb 19 17:30:38 2025 Shadow wrote:
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 18:01:52 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
JFK autopsy results showed a basebsll sized hole in the back of his head >>>>Where exactly does it say that in the autopsy?
You can send me links. I have no use for anti-viruses(which
are really spyware).
TIA
Who was sitting directly in front of Kennedy and was also hit
by the SAME shot(s)? Less seriously, because the bullets had lost most >>>> of their energy.
Just wondering.
The papers on the actual JFK assassination was only released recently when President Trump came in and took the seurity clearance off of it. What have you been reading that bullshit lying Warren Report?
I don't know what actually happened, but the Warren Report
is mostly obfuscation and misdirection.
Then again, any agency worth it's salt* (FBI, CIA, NSA, the
various military intelligence services and probably
political party factota as well) have spent the past 60
years removing, editing, adding and generally spoliating
whatever remains in various files.
p.s. I strongly doubt that, even given the above, everything
extant has been released. Ditto for the other two notable
1960s assassinations.
*assassinating a President is actually complex and
difficult. Document tampering is relatively easy; even Sandy
Berger...
Nothing to see here, folks.
--
C'est bon
Soloman
On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 12:58:54 -0600, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
On 2/19/2025 12:36 PM, cyclintom wrote:had lied to him about Vietnam - there WAS no movement for a free
On Wed Feb 19 04:02:42 2025 Catrike Ryder wrote:
I'm not execting anything earthshattering. Such secrets as that tend
to find their way to the surface.
The papers are quit explicit. JFK relalized that the CIA
enterprise system there. Most of Vietnam didn't care what government
they had and Communism sounded better to them as it does to Shadow.
The CIA was doing nothing more than they did all over the world in the
last 70 years: start wars to profit the weapons industry. Kennedy was
going to pull the US military including the military advisors out of
Vietnam.
CIA simply told them that it was Kennedy's idea.
The CIA first enlisted Cuban Castroites too kill Kennedy since they were more than pissed off from the failed Bay of Pigs invasion effort. The
sau that the newly released papers would be earthshattering.
Since only 45% of the public believed the Warren Commision I wouldn't
kill his father - that like all fools with a gun he missed with every
But RFK Jr. has said MANY times that Sirhan Sirhan did NOT
shot and his father was killed (Remember, at the time RFK was attorney General who could open a case about his brother's assassination.) by
being shot in the back at close range. It is EASY to tell the exact
range since anything closer than 10 feet leaves unmistakeable traces.
In RFK's case the gun was pressed into his back. The details are too
ugly to describe,
Dr. Martin Luther King. Why that SOB was preaching PEACE. The CIA
It also appears that the CIA was involved in the assassination of
couldn't have that. Even when I was in Guam, the CIA was running drugs
out of Laos using military aircraft that they would park far away from
our bombers. Ground crews would tell us what was going on.
Now that is something I know, a bit about.
Were there U.S. military aircraft stationed in Laos? Nope as Laos
was, technically, a neutral country there were no U.S. military
aircraft stationed in Laos.
However there were aircraft flying into Laos from bases in Thailand by
Air America, a "civilian" group, but none with the range to fly from
SEA to Guam. In fact they were mostly helicopters.
Was there dope smuggling? Probably, after all opium was apparently
legal in Laos, or at least sold openly in the Vientiane market.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 08:55:07 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,060 |
| Messages: | 6,416,667 |