• Campy rear der

    From Ted@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 11 16:05:23 2025
    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem with a Shimano
    triple. It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the thumb lever has stopped
    returning to the neutral position after being pressed. I've lubed the heck
    out of it, and it seems it may be getting very slightly better--but I'm
    wondering if it may be likely that something has broken inside the brifter.
    Any tips for restoring full function (all else is fine), or am I destined
    to get a new one?

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted on Tue Mar 11 11:17:57 2025
    On 3/11/2025 11:05 AM, Ted wrote:


    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem
    with a Shimano
    triple.  It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the thumb lever
    has stopped
    returning to the neutral position after being pressed.  I've
    lubed the heck
    out of it, and it seems it may be getting very slightly
    better--but I'm
    wondering if it may be likely that something has broken
    inside the brifter.
    Any tips for restoring full function (all else is fine), or
    am I destined
    to get a new one?

    Usually a simple fix.

    Flip the bike upside down and look closely at the return
    lever pivot. If you're my age, use a magnifier and a good
    light. It's assembly "S" here:

    www.yellowjersey.org/ergo1.html

    You can move the rubber cover around as needed to see what
    you're doing.

    There is a stamped rivet on which that lever pivots. It's
    likely rusted. Under the lever, barely visible, is the
    world's smallest spring. It's likely rusted as well. Use
    your favorite rust breaker (We like the GM-Delco Rust
    Breaker, or use PB Blaster, Kroil, whatever.) and work the
    lever until it is free.

    If that return lever sticks, the rest of the mechanism
    cannot move.

    Add a drop of oil at that point on your other lever while
    it's upside down and again annually.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Tue Mar 11 17:32:49 2025
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 11:05 AM, Ted wrote:

    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem
    with a Shimano triple. It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the
    thumb lever has stopped returning to the neutral position
    after being pressed.

    Usually a simple fix.

    Flip the bike upside down and look closely at the return lever
    pivot. If you're my age, use a magnifier and a good light.
    It's assembly "S" here:

    www.yellowjersey.org/ergo1.html

    You can move the rubber cover around as needed to see what
    you're doing.

    There is a stamped rivet on which that lever pivots. It's
    likely rusted. Under the lever, barely visible, is the world's
    smallest spring. It's likely rusted as well. Use your favorite
    rust breaker (We like the GM-Delco Rust Breaker, or use PB
    Blaster, Kroil, whatever.) and work the lever until it is free.

    If that return lever sticks, the rest of the mechanism cannot
    move.

    Add a drop of oil at that point on your other lever while it's
    upside down and again annually.

    Perfect, thanks! Not sure it's my favorite, but PB Blaster is
    what I have on hand. So far no release, but I'll let it keep
    soaking.

    And yeah, I need a magnifier. Taking off my glasses and getting
    my eyes really close is my typical approach.

    As I started writing just now to say that the other brifter is
    Shimano and not Campy, I realized I should have said the stuck
    Campy is the brifter for the front der. I think the guts are very
    similar?

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm sure you
    know. I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've lubed its
    internals too.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Tue Mar 11 12:40:48 2025
    On 3/11/2025 12:32 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 11:05 AM, Ted wrote:

    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem
    with a Shimano triple. It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the
    thumb lever has stopped returning to the neutral position
    after being pressed.

    Usually a simple fix.

    Flip the bike upside down and look closely at the return lever
    pivot. If you're my age, use a magnifier and a good light.
    It's assembly "S" here:

    www.yellowjersey.org/ergo1.html

    You can move the rubber cover around as needed to see what
    you're doing.

    There is a stamped rivet on which that lever pivots. It's
    likely rusted. Under the lever, barely visible, is the world's
    smallest spring. It's likely rusted as well. Use your favorite
    rust breaker (We like the GM-Delco Rust Breaker, or use PB
    Blaster, Kroil, whatever.) and work the lever until it is free.

    If that return lever sticks, the rest of the mechanism cannot
    move.

    Add a drop of oil at that point on your other lever while it's
    upside down and again annually.

    Perfect, thanks! Not sure it's my favorite, but PB Blaster is
    what I have on hand. So far no release, but I'll let it keep
    soaking.

    And yeah, I need a magnifier. Taking off my glasses and getting
    my eyes really close is my typical approach.

    As I started writing just now to say that the other brifter is
    Shimano and not Campy, I realized I should have said the stuck
    Campy is the brifter for the front der. I think the guts are very
    similar?

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm sure you
    know. I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've lubed its
    internals too.


    The Ergo system (generally, all generations) is quite
    different from the STi system (again, many variants since
    1992). As such, the wear symptoms and failure modes are
    utterly different. Plus Ergo before 2010 were totally
    repairable/rebuildable unlike the STi design.

    They do share one common foible in that when the release
    lever is stuck, nothing else can move.

    p.s. In nine speed, all nine cassettes shift in any nine
    system so if you have a Shimano wheel with an Ergo 9 shift
    system, spacing is identical. Nine was a brief kumbaya
    moment for standards otherwise in conflict, before and
    since, in that regard.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Tue Mar 11 17:45:58 2025
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:40:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 12:32 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm sure you
    know. I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've lubed
    its internals too.

    p.s. In nine speed, all nine cassettes shift in any nine system
    so if you have a Shimano wheel with an Ergo 9 shift system,
    spacing is identical. Nine was a brief kumbaya moment for
    standards otherwise in conflict, before and since, in that
    regard.

    Ya know, I've always heard (and read) that about nine speeds, but
    I could never get the Campy 9-speed derailer to reliably shift the
    Shimano 9-speed rear der on our first tandem (originally with
    Suntour 7 speed). I tried a J-tek adaptor--it helped some, but
    still shifted poorly.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Tue Mar 11 13:25:41 2025
    On 3/11/2025 12:45 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:40:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 12:32 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm sure you
    know. I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've lubed
    its internals too.

    p.s. In nine speed, all nine cassettes shift in any nine system
    so if you have a Shimano wheel with an Ergo 9 shift system,
    spacing is identical. Nine was a brief kumbaya moment for
    standards otherwise in conflict, before and since, in that
    regard.

    Ya know, I've always heard (and read) that about nine speeds, but
    I could never get the Campy 9-speed derailer to reliably shift the
    Shimano 9-speed rear der on our first tandem (originally with
    Suntour 7 speed). I tried a J-tek adaptor--it helped some, but
    still shifted poorly.


    Campagnolo long cage nine rear changer with Ergo lever?
    Should shift perfectly on a Shimano 9 cassette.

    Set up many Santanas that way as the Santana/Hadley hub only
    takes Shimano format cassettes.

    http://www.yellowjersey.org/SGSANTAN.JPG

    (with an STi, lever I'd suggest a Deore changer.)

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted on Tue Mar 11 15:46:52 2025
    On 3/11/2025 3:39 PM, Ted wrote:
    On 3/11/25 2:25 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 12:45 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:40:48 -0500,
       AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
      On 3/11/2025 12:32 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
        AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because
    tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm
    sure you
    know.  I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've
    lubed
    its internals too.

      p.s. In nine speed, all nine cassettes shift in any
    nine system
      so if you have a Shimano wheel with an Ergo 9 shift
    system,
      spacing is identical. Nine was a brief kumbaya moment for
      standards otherwise in conflict, before and since, in
    that
      regard.

    Ya know, I've always heard (and read) that about nine
    speeds, but
    I could never get the Campy 9-speed derailer to reliably
    shift the
    Shimano 9-speed rear der on our first tandem (originally
    with
    Suntour 7 speed).  I tried a J-tek adaptor--it helped
    some, but
    still shifted poorly.


    Campagnolo long cage nine rear changer with Ergo lever?
    Should shift perfectly on a Shimano 9 cassette.

    Set up many Santanas that way as the Santana/Hadley hub
    only takes Shimano format cassettes.

    http://www.yellowjersey.org/SGSANTAN.JPG

    (with an STi, lever I'd suggest a Deore changer.)


    Maybe the problem was from mixing a Shimano derailer with
    the Ergo.  It's
    been at least 15 years, so my memory is a bit hazy.

    Very probably so.

    Yes, I recall such mixed drive systems had a following but a
    Deore with an STi is a very snappy nine setup. Just like a
    matching Campagnolo system.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Tue Mar 11 20:39:18 2025
    On 3/11/25 2:25 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 12:45 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:40:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 12:32 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm sure you
    know. I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've lubed
    its internals too.

    p.s. In nine speed, all nine cassettes shift in any nine system
    so if you have a Shimano wheel with an Ergo 9 shift system,
    spacing is identical. Nine was a brief kumbaya moment for
    standards otherwise in conflict, before and since, in that
    regard.

    Ya know, I've always heard (and read) that about nine speeds, but
    I could never get the Campy 9-speed derailer to reliably shift the
    Shimano 9-speed rear der on our first tandem (originally with
    Suntour 7 speed). I tried a J-tek adaptor--it helped some, but
    still shifted poorly.


    Campagnolo long cage nine rear changer with Ergo lever?
    Should shift perfectly on a Shimano 9 cassette.

    Set up many Santanas that way as the Santana/Hadley hub only
    takes Shimano format cassettes.

    http://www.yellowjersey.org/SGSANTAN.JPG

    (with an STi, lever I'd suggest a Deore changer.)


    Maybe the problem was from mixing a Shimano derailer with the Ergo. It's
    been at least 15 years, so my memory is a bit hazy.

    --
    Ted H <theise@panix.com>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Tue Mar 11 21:04:08 2025
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:40:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 12:32 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 11:05 AM, Ted wrote:

    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem
    with a Shimano triple. It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the
    thumb lever has stopped returning to the neutral position
    after being pressed.

    Usually a simple fix.

    Flip the bike upside down and look closely at the return
    lever pivot. If you're my age, use a magnifier and a good
    light. It's assembly "S" here:

    www.yellowjersey.org/ergo1.html

    You can move the rubber cover around as needed to see what
    you're doing.

    There is a stamped rivet on which that lever pivots. It's
    likely rusted. Under the lever, barely visible, is the
    world's smallest spring. It's likely rusted as well. Use
    your favorite rust breaker (We like the GM-Delco Rust
    Breaker, or use PB Blaster, Kroil, whatever.) and work the
    lever until it is free.

    If that return lever sticks, the rest of the mechanism
    cannot move.

    Add a drop of oil at that point on your other lever while
    it's upside down and again annually.

    Perfect, thanks! Not sure it's my favorite, but PB Blaster is
    what I have on hand. So far no release, but I'll let it keep
    soaking.

    And yeah, I need a magnifier. Taking off my glasses and
    getting my eyes really close is my typical approach.

    As I started writing just now to say that the other brifter is
    Shimano and not Campy, I realized I should have said the stuck
    Campy is the brifter for the front der. I think the guts are
    very similar?

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm sure you
    know. I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've lubed
    its internals too.


    The Ergo system (generally, all generations) is quite different
    from the STi system (again, many variants since 1992). As
    such, the wear symptoms and failure modes are utterly
    different. Plus Ergo before 2010 were totally
    repairable/rebuildable unlike the STi design.

    They do share one common foible in that when the release lever
    is stuck, nothing else can move.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    So after riding it this afternoon, it's still not working as it
    should. After some reflection, I wonder if we're talking about
    the same thing. The shifter works both directions, both levers
    move--it's just that the thumb lever doesn't come back to its
    normal resting position after being pressed and then released.
    I'm wondering if maybe the spring is broken.

    Another oddity of that shifter the last year or so is it tends to
    loosen on its own. In particular, as we ride along on the large
    ring the derailer will gradually move toward the middle ring. I
    seem to recall it's gone so far as to downshift on its own a few
    times.

    In any case, that lever is over 25 years old and by now has served
    me for many, many thousands of miles. Probably time for a new
    one.

    The front derailer is a Shimano Ultegra that would would have been
    new when we bought the Santana in 2012. I think I pulled out the
    Ergo brifter (left over from my old Waterford) and put it on the
    tandem when it seemed I could never get the Shimano shifter to
    trim the derailer on the triple ring.

    Any suggestions on what I should look for? I'm willing to get a
    new front der too, if that makes it easier.

    And thanks much for the help, Andrew. I really appreciate it.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Tue Mar 11 17:48:21 2025
    On 3/11/2025 4:04 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:40:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 12:32 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 11:05 AM, Ted wrote:

    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem
    with a Shimano triple. It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the
    thumb lever has stopped returning to the neutral position
    after being pressed.

    Usually a simple fix.

    Flip the bike upside down and look closely at the return
    lever pivot. If you're my age, use a magnifier and a good
    light. It's assembly "S" here:

    www.yellowjersey.org/ergo1.html

    You can move the rubber cover around as needed to see what
    you're doing.

    There is a stamped rivet on which that lever pivots. It's
    likely rusted. Under the lever, barely visible, is the
    world's smallest spring. It's likely rusted as well. Use
    your favorite rust breaker (We like the GM-Delco Rust
    Breaker, or use PB Blaster, Kroil, whatever.) and work the
    lever until it is free.

    If that return lever sticks, the rest of the mechanism
    cannot move.

    Add a drop of oil at that point on your other lever while
    it's upside down and again annually.

    Perfect, thanks! Not sure it's my favorite, but PB Blaster is
    what I have on hand. So far no release, but I'll let it keep
    soaking.

    And yeah, I need a magnifier. Taking off my glasses and
    getting my eyes really close is my typical approach.

    As I started writing just now to say that the other brifter is
    Shimano and not Campy, I realized I should have said the stuck
    Campy is the brifter for the front der. I think the guts are
    very similar?

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm sure you
    know. I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've lubed
    its internals too.


    The Ergo system (generally, all generations) is quite different
    from the STi system (again, many variants since 1992). As
    such, the wear symptoms and failure modes are utterly
    different. Plus Ergo before 2010 were totally
    repairable/rebuildable unlike the STi design.

    They do share one common foible in that when the release lever
    is stuck, nothing else can move.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    So after riding it this afternoon, it's still not working as it
    should. After some reflection, I wonder if we're talking about
    the same thing. The shifter works both directions, both levers
    move--it's just that the thumb lever doesn't come back to its
    normal resting position after being pressed and then released.
    I'm wondering if maybe the spring is broken.

    Another oddity of that shifter the last year or so is it tends to
    loosen on its own. In particular, as we ride along on the large
    ring the derailer will gradually move toward the middle ring. I
    seem to recall it's gone so far as to downshift on its own a few
    times.

    In any case, that lever is over 25 years old and by now has served
    me for many, many thousands of miles. Probably time for a new
    one.

    The front derailer is a Shimano Ultegra that would would have been
    new when we bought the Santana in 2012. I think I pulled out the
    Ergo brifter (left over from my old Waterford) and put it on the
    tandem when it seemed I could never get the Shimano shifter to
    trim the derailer on the triple ring.

    Any suggestions on what I should look for? I'm willing to get a
    new front der too, if that makes it easier.

    And thanks much for the help, Andrew. I really appreciate it.


    Well, it should return exactly the same as the other side,
    which you have handy for comparison.

    IME it's binding from rust, not a physical lack of the
    spring. Removing the spring, which will travel quite far
    and is extremely hard to spot, is not recommended.

    You might also ensure the rubber lever cover itself is not
    impeding the lever motion. I have seen than when worn covers
    wander about.

    The symptom "will not stay in gear" is the normal wearing
    indicator. Rebuild with a new spring set ($30) to return to
    snappy as new shifting. The spring set starts as round wire
    and slowly degrades to a "D" section. The springs engage a
    sintered hardened steel index gear which will not show wear.

    Unless crashed or extremely corroded it's unlikely to need
    other parts inside. Rebuild usually entails new wires (or
    complete cable set) and tape.

    Ergos before 2010 are compatible with any front changer-
    double, triple, any brand, modern or vintage.

    Modern LH shifters (all brands) have futzy complex
    compatibility charts so if you do buy a new lever get a new
    matching front changer.
    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Wed Mar 12 01:36:48 2025
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:48:21 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 4:04 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:40:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    The Ergo system (generally, all generations) is quite
    different from the STi system (again, many variants since
    1992). As such, the wear symptoms and failure modes are
    utterly different. Plus Ergo before 2010 were totally
    repairable/rebuildable unlike the STi design.

    They do share one common foible in that when the release
    lever is stuck, nothing else can move.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    So after riding it this afternoon, it's still not working as
    it should. After some reflection, I wonder if we're talking
    about the same thing. The shifter works both directions, both
    levers move--it's just that the thumb lever doesn't come back
    to its normal resting position after being pressed and then
    released. I'm wondering if maybe the spring is broken.

    The front derailer is a Shimano Ultegra that would would have
    been new when we bought the Santana in 2012. I think I pulled
    out the Ergo brifter (left over from my old Waterford) and put
    it on the tandem when it seemed I could never get the Shimano
    shifter to trim the derailer on the triple ring.

    Well, it should return exactly the same as the other side,
    which you have handy for comparison.

    Actually, the other side is Shimano. All components are Shimano
    except for the left shifter.


    IME it's binding from rust, not a physical lack of the spring.
    Removing the spring, which will travel quite far and is
    extremely hard to spot, is not recommended.

    You might also ensure the rubber lever cover itself is not
    impeding the lever motion. I have seen than when worn covers
    wander about.

    The symptom "will not stay in gear" is the normal wearing
    indicator. Rebuild with a new spring set ($30) to return to
    snappy as new shifting. The spring set starts as round wire and
    slowly degrades to a "D" section. The springs engage a sintered
    hardened steel index gear which will not show wear.

    Okay, that all makes sense. I found a left Ergo rebuild kit here,
    but it says "sold out"

    https://branfordbike.com/ergo-shifter-parts

    I also found a new 10 sp left shifter here...

    https://sscycleworks.com/components/shift-levers-campagnolo-ergopower-parts.html

    I don't feel very confident in rebuilding the silly thing, so that
    seems like it might be my best bet if I want to stay with a Campy
    shifter. If it's the right one. The hood front on mine says...

    CARBON
    BB-SYSTEM

    and I think it is 9-speed, but for a front derailer it seems an
    extra click would be just fine.


    Unless crashed or extremely corroded it's unlikely to need
    other parts inside. Rebuild usually entails new wires (or
    complete cable set) and tape.

    Ergos before 2010 are compatible with any front changer-
    double, triple, any brand, modern or vintage.


    Modern LH shifters (all brands) have futzy complex
    compatibility charts so if you do buy a new lever get a new
    matching front changer.

    Appreciate the voice of experience here. Again.

    If I were to go back to Shimano, is there a specific model and
    part you would recommend for my triple chainring setup? It's
    26-39-50, in case it matters.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 12 15:57:00 2025
    On Tue Mar 11 17:32:49 2025 Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:17:57 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 11:05 AM, Ted wrote:

    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem
    with a Shimano triple. It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the
    thumb lever has stopped returning to the neutral position
    after being pressed.

    Usually a simple fix.

    Flip the bike upside down and look closely at the return lever
    pivot. If you're my age, use a magnifier and a good light.
    It's assembly "S" here:

    www.yellowjersey.org/ergo1.html

    You can move the rubber cover around as needed to see what
    you're doing.

    There is a stamped rivet on which that lever pivots. It's
    likely rusted. Under the lever, barely visible, is the world's
    smallest spring. It's likely rusted as well. Use your favorite
    rust breaker (We like the GM-Delco Rust Breaker, or use PB
    Blaster, Kroil, whatever.) and work the lever until it is free.

    If that return lever sticks, the rest of the mechanism cannot
    move.

    Add a drop of oil at that point on your other lever while it's
    upside down and again annually.

    Perfect, thanks! Not sure it's my favorite, but PB Blaster is
    what I have on hand. So far no release, but I'll let it keep
    soaking.

    And yeah, I need a magnifier. Taking off my glasses and getting
    my eyes really close is my typical approach.

    As I started writing just now to say that the other brifter is
    Shimano and not Campy, I realized I should have said the stuck
    Campy is the brifter for the front der. I think the guts are very
    similar?

    FWIW, I run a Shimano brifter for the rear because tandem hubs
    seem to all be designed for Shimano cassettes, as I'm sure you
    know. I think this is a 10 speed, but in any case I've lubed its
    internals too.




    It is more likely that the end of that spring (S) has broken and needs to be replaced. Campy is made to be repairable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 12 16:03:19 2025
    On Wed Mar 12 01:36:48 2025 Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:48:21 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 4:04 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 12:40:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    The Ergo system (generally, all generations) is quite
    different from the STi system (again, many variants since
    1992). As such, the wear symptoms and failure modes are
    utterly different. Plus Ergo before 2010 were totally
    repairable/rebuildable unlike the STi design.

    They do share one common foible in that when the release
    lever is stuck, nothing else can move.
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

    So after riding it this afternoon, it's still not working as
    it should. After some reflection, I wonder if we're talking
    about the same thing. The shifter works both directions, both
    levers move--it's just that the thumb lever doesn't come back
    to its normal resting position after being pressed and then
    released. I'm wondering if maybe the spring is broken.

    The front derailer is a Shimano Ultegra that would would have
    been new when we bought the Santana in 2012. I think I pulled
    out the Ergo brifter (left over from my old Waterford) and put
    it on the tandem when it seemed I could never get the Shimano
    shifter to trim the derailer on the triple ring.

    Well, it should return exactly the same as the other side,
    which you have handy for comparison.

    Actually, the other side is Shimano. All components are Shimano
    except for the left shifter.


    IME it's binding from rust, not a physical lack of the spring.
    Removing the spring, which will travel quite far and is
    extremely hard to spot, is not recommended.

    You might also ensure the rubber lever cover itself is not
    impeding the lever motion. I have seen than when worn covers
    wander about.

    The symptom "will not stay in gear" is the normal wearing
    indicator. Rebuild with a new spring set ($30) to return to
    snappy as new shifting. The spring set starts as round wire and
    slowly degrades to a "D" section. The springs engage a sintered
    hardened steel index gear which will not show wear.

    Okay, that all makes sense. I found a left Ergo rebuild kit here,
    but it says "sold out"

    https://branfordbike.com/ergo-shifter-parts

    I also found a new 10 sp left shifter here...

    https://sscycleworks.com/components/shift-levers-campagnolo-ergopower-parts.html

    I don't feel very confident in rebuilding the silly thing, so that
    seems like it might be my best bet if I want to stay with a Campy
    shifter. If it's the right one. The hood front on mine says...

    CARBON
    BB-SYSTEM

    and I think it is 9-speed, but for a front derailer it seems an
    extra click would be just fine.


    Unless crashed or extremely corroded it's unlikely to need
    other parts inside. Rebuild usually entails new wires (or
    complete cable set) and tape.

    Ergos before 2010 are compatible with any front changer-
    double, triple, any brand, modern or vintage.


    Modern LH shifters (all brands) have futzy complex
    compatibility charts so if you do buy a new lever get a new
    matching front changer.

    Appreciate the voice of experience here. Again.

    If I were to go back to Shimano, is there a specific model and
    part you would recommend for my triple chainring setup? It's
    26-39-50, in case it matters.




    The early 10 speed left lever could shift triples but they rapidly changed over to a two speed changer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Mar 13 15:02:34 2025
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:48:21 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 4:04 PM, Ted Heise wrote:

    In any case, that lever is over 25 years old and by now has
    served me for many, many thousands of miles. Probably time
    for a new one.

    Any suggestions on what I should look for? I'm willing to get
    a new front der too, if that makes it easier.

    Ergos before 2010 are compatible with any front changer-
    double, triple, any brand, modern or vintage.

    Modern LH shifters (all brands) have futzy complex
    compatibility charts so if you do buy a new lever get a new
    matching front changer.

    Well, I ordered this, and will cross my fingers that it works well
    with my existing Ultegra front derailer (from about 2012)...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-st4703-brake-shift-levers-black-left-3x-ist4703li2/p1582943?v=1163484&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwhMq-BhCFARIsAGvo0KdIIJdmPqPfG3DJa-4q3cGPbZYyAGoSKCJi_TnZKa8vH8PlfxheO5YaAmpsEALw_wcB

    If it doesn't work, it looks like this would be the derailer that
    corresponds to that shifter...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-fd4703-front-derailleur-3-x-10-speed-34.9mm-ifd4703bl/p1278459?v=479700


    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Thu Mar 13 10:34:03 2025
    On 3/13/2025 10:02 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:48:21 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 4:04 PM, Ted Heise wrote:

    In any case, that lever is over 25 years old and by now has
    served me for many, many thousands of miles. Probably time
    for a new one.

    Any suggestions on what I should look for? I'm willing to get
    a new front der too, if that makes it easier.

    Ergos before 2010 are compatible with any front changer-
    double, triple, any brand, modern or vintage.

    Modern LH shifters (all brands) have futzy complex
    compatibility charts so if you do buy a new lever get a new
    matching front changer.

    Well, I ordered this, and will cross my fingers that it works well
    with my existing Ultegra front derailer (from about 2012)...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-st4703-brake-shift-levers-black-left-3x-ist4703li2/p1582943?v=1163484&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwhMq-BhCFARIsAGvo0KdIIJdmPqPfG3DJa-4q3cGPbZYyAGoSKCJi_TnZKa8vH8PlfxheO5YaAmpsEALw_wcB

    If it doesn't work, it looks like this would be the derailer that
    corresponds to that shifter...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-fd4703-front-derailleur-3-x-10-speed-34.9mm-ifd4703bl/p1278459?v=479700



    Yes, I mentioned that.
    ST-4703 has to use FD-4703 and cannot shift the older Tiagra
    model, nor Ultegra, 105 etc:

    https://productinfo.shimano.com/en/compatibility/C-455

    Both Campagnolo and Shimano have made a lot of front
    changers the past few years with radically different upper
    arm length, both longer and shorter than classic, which
    require levers with matching cable travel.


    Compare FD-4703 upper arm: https://rower.com.pl/images/cache/f/shimano-tiagra-fd-4703-przerzutka-przednia-3x10-rz-lutowana-547369-867x768.jpg

    to a recent 105 for example: https://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/32/3835-13313-main-fd-5800-black-32.jpg


    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Mar 13 15:55:10 2025
    On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:34:03 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/13/2025 10:02 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:48:21 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    Ergos before 2010 are compatible with any front changer-
    double, triple, any brand, modern or vintage.

    Modern LH shifters (all brands) have futzy complex
    compatibility charts so if you do buy a new lever get a new
    matching front changer.

    Well, I ordered this, and will cross my fingers that it works
    well with my existing Ultegra front derailer (from about
    2012)...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-st4703-brake-shift-levers-black-left-3x-ist4703li2/p1582943?v=1163484&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwhMq-BhCFARIsAGvo0KdIIJdmPqPfG3DJa-4q3cGPbZYyAGoSKCJi_TnZKa8vH8PlfxheO5YaAmpsEALw_wcB

    If it doesn't work, it looks like this would be the derailer
    that corresponds to that shifter...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-fd4703-front-derailleur-3-x-10-speed-34.9mm-ifd4703bl/p1278459?v=479700

    Yes, I mentioned that.

    Yes, you did. I saw your reference to "futzy complex
    compatibility charts" and concluded that even if I was able to
    track down the charts they might not do me that much good. Maybe
    I misread or was overly scared. :-/


    ST-4703 has to use FD-4703 and cannot shift the older Tiagra
    model, nor Ultegra, 105 etc:

    https://productinfo.shimano.com/en/compatibility/C-455

    Yikes, I see what you mean about futzy!


    Both Campagnolo and Shimano have made a lot of front changers
    the past few years with radically different upper arm length,
    both longer and shorter than classic, which require levers with
    matching cable travel.

    I will go order the proper front der right now. Thanks for the
    wisdom, and the illustrations!

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Thu Mar 13 12:02:48 2025
    On 3/13/2025 10:55 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:34:03 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/13/2025 10:02 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:48:21 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    Ergos before 2010 are compatible with any front changer-
    double, triple, any brand, modern or vintage.

    Modern LH shifters (all brands) have futzy complex
    compatibility charts so if you do buy a new lever get a new
    matching front changer.

    Well, I ordered this, and will cross my fingers that it works
    well with my existing Ultegra front derailer (from about
    2012)...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-st4703-brake-shift-levers-black-left-3x-ist4703li2/p1582943?v=1163484&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwhMq-BhCFARIsAGvo0KdIIJdmPqPfG3DJa-4q3cGPbZYyAGoSKCJi_TnZKa8vH8PlfxheO5YaAmpsEALw_wcB

    If it doesn't work, it looks like this would be the derailer
    that corresponds to that shifter...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-fd4703-front-derailleur-3-x-10-speed-34.9mm-ifd4703bl/p1278459?v=479700

    Yes, I mentioned that.

    Yes, you did. I saw your reference to "futzy complex
    compatibility charts" and concluded that even if I was able to
    track down the charts they might not do me that much good. Maybe
    I misread or was overly scared. :-/


    ST-4703 has to use FD-4703 and cannot shift the older Tiagra
    model, nor Ultegra, 105 etc:

    https://productinfo.shimano.com/en/compatibility/C-455

    Yikes, I see what you mean about futzy!


    Both Campagnolo and Shimano have made a lot of front changers
    the past few years with radically different upper arm length,
    both longer and shorter than classic, which require levers with
    matching cable travel.

    I will go order the proper front der right now. Thanks for the
    wisdom, and the illustrations!


    I would have rebuilt the Ergo lever but matching new STi &
    FD works as well.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Mar 14 14:48:48 2025
    On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:02:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/13/2025 10:55 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:34:03 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    Both Campagnolo and Shimano have made a lot of front
    changers the past few years with radically different upper
    arm length, both longer and shorter than classic, which
    require levers with matching cable travel.

    I will go order the proper front der right now. Thanks for
    the wisdom, and the illustrations!

    I would have rebuilt the Ergo lever but matching new STi & FD
    works as well.

    I understand, and don't disagree. Dredging through the dark
    recesses of what used to be my memory, there seems to be a
    suspicion that I had trouble getting the original Shimano triple
    system (Ultegra shifter and derailer from 2012) to reliably go
    onto the small ring and that's why I went to the Ergo shifter.
    But I could be wrong.

    In any case, I've been thinking to find a rebuild kit for the
    Campy shifter and give the job a go--if nothing more than as a
    backup to the new Shimano components. I just didn't think to
    mention this as a plan.

    This site lists what seems to be exactly what I would need, but
    says it's sold out...

    https://branfordbike.com/ergo-shifter-parts


    The Performance site lists a lot of individual parts, but nothing
    like a kit that I can see...

    https://www.performancebike.com/campagnolo-shifter-parts-shifters/c16646?fb=1011&srsltid=AfmBOoqTy_t2eBB531sqcn7tYucZWh_ArCPwDmBxYeum1aAt_rVtY1QM


    This site seems to have what's needed, but I'm not sure it's true
    (the site function seems slightly sketchy)...

    https://www.eurobikeparts.com/proddetail.php?prod=CA-ERGOUPG_P&srsltid=AfmBOopKBZFxNzRP7YhstZu5xoN4jkl5SDH_3rRiaV06UQNxpiLBTJ5g


    This site lists a NOS lever...

    https://sscycleworks.com/components/shift-levers-campagnolo-ergopower-parts.html


    Any suggestions or pointers for me out of those (or other)
    options?

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Fri Mar 14 12:01:53 2025
    On 3/14/2025 9:48 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:02:48 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/13/2025 10:55 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 10:34:03 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    Both Campagnolo and Shimano have made a lot of front
    changers the past few years with radically different upper
    arm length, both longer and shorter than classic, which
    require levers with matching cable travel.

    I will go order the proper front der right now. Thanks for
    the wisdom, and the illustrations!

    I would have rebuilt the Ergo lever but matching new STi & FD
    works as well.

    I understand, and don't disagree. Dredging through the dark
    recesses of what used to be my memory, there seems to be a
    suspicion that I had trouble getting the original Shimano triple
    system (Ultegra shifter and derailer from 2012) to reliably go
    onto the small ring and that's why I went to the Ergo shifter.
    But I could be wrong.

    In any case, I've been thinking to find a rebuild kit for the
    Campy shifter and give the job a go--if nothing more than as a
    backup to the new Shimano components. I just didn't think to
    mention this as a plan.

    This site lists what seems to be exactly what I would need, but
    says it's sold out...

    https://branfordbike.com/ergo-shifter-parts


    The Performance site lists a lot of individual parts, but nothing
    like a kit that I can see...

    https://www.performancebike.com/campagnolo-shifter-parts-shifters/c16646?fb=1011&srsltid=AfmBOoqTy_t2eBB531sqcn7tYucZWh_ArCPwDmBxYeum1aAt_rVtY1QM


    This site seems to have what's needed, but I'm not sure it's true
    (the site function seems slightly sketchy)...

    https://www.eurobikeparts.com/proddetail.php?prod=CA-ERGOUPG_P&srsltid=AfmBOopKBZFxNzRP7YhstZu5xoN4jkl5SDH_3rRiaV06UQNxpiLBTJ5g


    This site lists a NOS lever...

    https://sscycleworks.com/components/shift-levers-campagnolo-ergopower-parts.html


    Any suggestions or pointers for me out of those (or other)
    options?


    Failing other options, you might just call or email us and
    buy a set of LH Ergo springs $29.95. We do a lot of Ergo
    repair/rebuild here.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 14 19:53:34 2025
    On Thu Mar 13 10:34:03 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/13/2025 10:02 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:48:21 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/11/2025 4:04 PM, Ted Heise wrote:

    In any case, that lever is over 25 years old and by now has
    served me for many, many thousands of miles. Probably time
    for a new one.

    Any suggestions on what I should look for? I'm willing to get
    a new front der too, if that makes it easier.

    Ergos before 2010 are compatible with any front changer-
    double, triple, any brand, modern or vintage.

    Modern LH shifters (all brands) have futzy complex
    compatibility charts so if you do buy a new lever get a new
    matching front changer.

    Well, I ordered this, and will cross my fingers that it works well
    with my existing Ultegra front derailer (from about 2012)...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-st4703-brake-shift-levers-black-left-3x-ist4703li2/p1582943?v=1163484&gad_source=1&gclid=Cj0KCQjwhMq-BhCFARIsAGvo0KdIIJdmPqPfG3DJa-4q3cGPbZYyAGoSKCJi_TnZKa8vH8PlfxheO5YaAmpsEALw_wcB

    If it doesn't work, it looks like this would be the derailer that corresponds to that shifter...

    https://www.performancebike.com/shimano-tiagra-fd4703-front-derailleur-3-x-10-speed-34.9mm-ifd4703bl/p1278459?v=479700



    Yes, I mentioned that.
    ST-4703 has to use FD-4703 and cannot shift the older Tiagra
    model, nor Ultegra, 105 etc:

    https://productinfo.shimano.com/en/compatibility/C-455

    Both Campagnolo and Shimano have made a lot of front
    changers the past few years with radically different upper
    arm length, both longer and shorter than classic, which
    require levers with matching cable travel.


    Compare FD-4703 upper arm: https://rower.com.pl/images/cache/f/shimano-tiagra-fd-4703-przerzutka-przednia-3x10-rz-lutowana-547369-867x768.jpg

    to a recent 105 for example: https://www.spacycles.co.uk/smsimg/32/3835-13313-main-fd-5800-black-32.jpg




    I have used long and short lever front deraileurs and while the long arm shifts more easily the actual leverage appears to be the same and the longer lever is easier because it had more leverage against the return spring.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Sat Mar 15 13:31:28 2025
    On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:07:42 -0400,
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 3/14/2025 10:48 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    I would have rebuilt the Ergo lever but matching new STi &
    FD works as well.

    I understand, and don't disagree. Dredging through the dark
    recesses of what used to be my memory, there seems to be a
    suspicion that I had trouble getting the original Shimano
    triple system (Ultegra shifter and derailer from 2012) to
    reliably go onto the small ring...

    This is sort of off topic, but I'll offer a bit of general
    advice.

    I've always kept little notepads or log books for car and
    motorcycle maintenance issues. When did I change the oil
    filter? And what model filter does it take? How did remove that
    taillight lens? ... etc.

    At a certain point in time, it occurred to me to keep the same
    sort of notebook on my bicycles. Of course, since I'm a
    (mostly) friction shifting retrogrouch, I don't have a lot of
    confusion about matching shifters and derailleurs.

    Being a chemist who kept many lab notebooks back in the day, this
    is nothing new to me. At one point (back in the days when it was
    easier to do auto repair) I kept a log for my car. After some
    years I found it more trouble than it was worth. I do still keep
    records for repairs and parts in folders, so I can go back and
    look at various activities.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Sat Mar 15 13:38:43 2025
    On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:01:53 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/14/2025 9:48 AM, Ted Heise wrote:

    In any case, I've been thinking to find a rebuild kit for the
    Campy shifter and give the job a go--if nothing more than as a
    backup to the new Shimano components. I just didn't think to
    mention this as a plan.

    This site lists what seems to be exactly what I would need,
    but says it's sold out...

    https://branfordbike.com/ergo-shifter-parts


    The Performance site lists a lot of individual parts, but
    nothing like a kit that I can see...

    https://www.performancebike.com/campagnolo-shifter-parts-shifters/c16646?fb=1011&srsltid=AfmBOoqTy_t2eBB531sqcn7tYucZWh_ArCPwDmBxYeum1aAt_rVtY1QM


    This site seems to have what's needed, but I'm not sure it's
    true (the site function seems slightly sketchy)...

    https://www.eurobikeparts.com/proddetail.php?prod=CA-ERGOUPG_P&srsltid=AfmBOopKBZFxNzRP7YhstZu5xoN4jkl5SDH_3rRiaV06UQNxpiLBTJ5g


    This site lists a NOS lever...

    https://sscycleworks.com/components/shift-levers-campagnolo-ergopower-parts.html


    Any suggestions or pointers for me out of those (or other)
    options?

    Failing other options, you might just call or email us and buy
    a set of LH Ergo springs $29.95. We do a lot of Ergo
    repair/rebuild here.

    Thanks, Andrew. I may just ship it your way and ask your shop to
    do the rebuild for me. The Shimano parts should be here early
    next week, so once they're on the tandem that will be a good time
    to get things started.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Sat Mar 15 08:57:18 2025
    On 3/15/2025 8:38 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:01:53 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/14/2025 9:48 AM, Ted Heise wrote:

    In any case, I've been thinking to find a rebuild kit for the
    Campy shifter and give the job a go--if nothing more than as a
    backup to the new Shimano components. I just didn't think to
    mention this as a plan.

    This site lists what seems to be exactly what I would need,
    but says it's sold out...

    https://branfordbike.com/ergo-shifter-parts


    The Performance site lists a lot of individual parts, but
    nothing like a kit that I can see...

    https://www.performancebike.com/campagnolo-shifter-parts-shifters/c16646?fb=1011&srsltid=AfmBOoqTy_t2eBB531sqcn7tYucZWh_ArCPwDmBxYeum1aAt_rVtY1QM


    This site seems to have what's needed, but I'm not sure it's
    true (the site function seems slightly sketchy)...

    https://www.eurobikeparts.com/proddetail.php?prod=CA-ERGOUPG_P&srsltid=AfmBOopKBZFxNzRP7YhstZu5xoN4jkl5SDH_3rRiaV06UQNxpiLBTJ5g


    This site lists a NOS lever...

    https://sscycleworks.com/components/shift-levers-campagnolo-ergopower-parts.html


    Any suggestions or pointers for me out of those (or other)
    options?

    Failing other options, you might just call or email us and buy
    a set of LH Ergo springs $29.95. We do a lot of Ergo
    repair/rebuild here.

    Thanks, Andrew. I may just ship it your way and ask your shop to
    do the rebuild for me. The Shimano parts should be here early
    next week, so once they're on the tandem that will be a good time
    to get things started.


    There are lots of functional modern components, but the
    pre-2010 Ergos are uniquely rebuildable, virtually forever.
    And the left side has otherwise unattainable universal
    compatibility!

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Sat Mar 15 14:18:49 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 3/14/2025 10:48 AM, Ted Heise wrote:

    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    I would have rebuilt the Ergo lever but matching new STi & FD
    works as well.

    I understand, and don't disagree. Dredging through the dark
    recesses of what used to be my memory, there seems to be a
    suspicion that I had trouble getting the original Shimano triple
    system (Ultegra shifter and derailer from 2012) to reliably go
    onto the small ring...

    This is sort of off topic, but I'll offer a bit of general advice.

    I've always kept little notepads or log books for car and motorcycle maintenance issues. When did I change the oil filter? And what model
    filter does it take? How did remove that taillight lens? ... etc.

    At a certain point in time, it occurred to me to keep the same sort of notebook on my bicycles. Of course, since I'm a (mostly) friction
    shifting retrogrouch, I don't have a lot of confusion about matching
    shifters and derailleurs.

    There have also been many times I've wished I'd thought to do a running
    log book on the house and yard. What brand and color of paint did we use
    for that trim? What's the number of the replacement cartridge for that bathtub faucet? etc. I finally started that log book a few years ago.

    I use Strava which logs the bikes and if one sets it up parts mileage,
    hence I can see the mileage and trends for parts and so on, car I do
    relatively low miles, I do track the MPG not sure why really!

    I do record stuff as well my memory is poor 99% of folks will have better memory so i can’t rely on it.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Sat Mar 15 15:59:46 2025
    cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com> wrote:
    On Fri Mar 14 12:07:42 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/14/2025 10:48 AM, Ted Heise wrote:

    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    I would have rebuilt the Ergo lever but matching new STi & FD
    works as well.

    I understand, and don't disagree. Dredging through the dark
    recesses of what used to be my memory, there seems to be a
    suspicion that I had trouble getting the original Shimano triple
    system (Ultegra shifter and derailer from 2012) to reliably go
    onto the small ring...

    This is sort of off topic, but I'll offer a bit of general advice.

    I've always kept little notepads or log books for car and motorcycle
    maintenance issues. When did I change the oil filter? And what model
    filter does it take? How did remove that taillight lens? ... etc.

    At a certain point in time, it occurred to me to keep the same sort of
    notebook on my bicycles. Of course, since I'm a (mostly) friction
    shifting retrogrouch, I don't have a lot of confusion about matching
    shifters and derailleurs.

    There have also been many times I've wished I'd thought to do a running
    log book on the house and yard. What brand and color of paint did we use
    for that trim? What's the number of the replacement cartridge for that
    bathtub faucet? etc. I finally started that log book a few years ago.




    That is probably a goog prsctice but with my smount of drivg, I don't
    need to keep track anmd change oil when I intend to go on a trip.


    Heh I think that might be deliberate! Spelling that is!

    I personally don’t drive much either so car has a MOT/service once a year which despite the cars age is generally minor stuff as well I do fairly low mileage.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 15 15:20:58 2025
    On Fri Mar 14 12:07:42 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/14/2025 10:48 AM, Ted Heise wrote:

    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    I would have rebuilt the Ergo lever but matching new STi & FD
    works as well.

    I understand, and don't disagree. Dredging through the dark
    recesses of what used to be my memory, there seems to be a
    suspicion that I had trouble getting the original Shimano triple
    system (Ultegra shifter and derailer from 2012) to reliably go
    onto the small ring...

    This is sort of off topic, but I'll offer a bit of general advice.

    I've always kept little notepads or log books for car and motorcycle maintenance issues. When did I change the oil filter? And what model
    filter does it take? How did remove that taillight lens? ... etc.

    At a certain point in time, it occurred to me to keep the same sort of notebook on my bicycles. Of course, since I'm a (mostly) friction
    shifting retrogrouch, I don't have a lot of confusion about matching
    shifters and derailleurs.

    There have also been many times I've wished I'd thought to do a running
    log book on the house and yard. What brand and color of paint did we use
    for that trim? What's the number of the replacement cartridge for that bathtub faucet? etc. I finally started that log book a few years ago.




    That is probably a goog prsctice but with my smount of drivg, I don't need to keep track anmd change oil when I intend to go on a trip.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Radey Shouman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Mon Mar 17 00:16:46 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/15/2025 9:31 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 12:07:42 -0400,
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
    On 3/14/2025 10:48 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    I would have rebuilt the Ergo lever but matching new STi &
    FD works as well.

    I understand, and don't disagree. Dredging through the dark
    recesses of what used to be my memory, there seems to be a
    suspicion that I had trouble getting the original Shimano
    triple system (Ultegra shifter and derailer from 2012) to
    reliably go onto the small ring...

    This is sort of off topic, but I'll offer a bit of general
    advice.

    I've always kept little notepads or log books for car and
    motorcycle maintenance issues. When did I change the oil
    filter? And what model filter does it take? How did remove that
    taillight lens? ... etc.

    At a certain point in time, it occurred to me to keep the same
    sort of notebook on my bicycles. Of course, since I'm a
    (mostly) friction shifting retrogrouch, I don't have a lot of
    confusion about matching shifters and derailleurs.
    Being a chemist who kept many lab notebooks back in the day, this
    is nothing new to me. At one point (back in the days when it was
    easier to do auto repair) I kept a log for my car. After some
    years I found it more trouble than it was worth.

    A couple years ago I came upon the ancient little notebook in which
    I'd kept records of the work I did on my 1966 Corvair. I was
    astonished at how often I was into the engine compartment or under the
    car. There was plenty to write in that notebook.

    This EV is at the opposite extreme. At each 7500 mile interval, the maintenance schedule says "Inspect... Inspect... Inspect..." All I've
    ever done is rotate tires and fill the windshield washer reservoir.

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)

    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are
    always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.

    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.

    Your mileage may vary.


    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 17 15:17:24 2025
    On Sat Mar 15 14:39:50 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:

    A couple years ago I came upon the ancient little notebook in which I'd
    kept records of the work I did on my 1966 Corvair. I was astonished at
    how often I was into the engine compartment or under the car. There was plenty to write in that notebook.

    This EV is at the opposite extreme. At each 7500 mile interval, the maintenance schedule says "Inspect... Inspect... Inspect..." All I've
    ever done is rotate tires and fill the windshield washer reservoir.

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, and
    do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)




    Comparing a new engine to one that had all of the bugs worked out is hardly fair. The early Corvair engine was decidedly unreliable but that from two years later was reliable. Chevrolet had no initial eexperience with air-cooled engines and their
    releasing a car to compete with the Volkswagon and using their customers as part of the experiment was pretty stupid.

    Likewise the Mazda 3 engine besides having years of developmwent is a very well known ICE type'

    Even mentioning an EV in the same breath is stupid since the complication is in the battery and not the engine which has one moving part. And the battery has now had more than a decade of development.

    Frank, as an mechanical engineer you're supposed to know these things. You're not supposed to be surprised that Musk's last two Mar's rockets exploded on takeoff. Or that their normal long development orbital rocket is reliable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Radey Shouman@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Mon Mar 17 15:29:13 2025
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are
    always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Radey Shouman on Mon Mar 17 17:04:53 2025
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are
    always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario
    would play safe!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Radey Shouman@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Tue Mar 18 15:08:08 2025
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are
    always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually
    cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is
    not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 18 17:20:14 2025
    Am 18.03.2025 um 16:08 schrieb Radey Shouman:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are
    always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as >> space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to >> transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is >> low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually
    cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    Just remember: when "destination charging" at the ski resort, put a stop
    below 80% full!

    Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.

    On mountain roads, you have to rely on good brakes.

    As of today, electric cars rarely drive faster than 80-90 mph on the
    autobahn but once you have a 600 mile range at 60 mph the driving will
    become similar to other cars. My company will only offer electric
    company cars from 2026 onwards, and our sales reps are know to be among
    the most ruthless drivers on the German autobahn.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Radey Shouman on Tue Mar 18 21:32:37 2025
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are
    always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as >> space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to >> transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is >> low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually
    cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with >> drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get >> brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is
    not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well as its cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum brakes which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and indeed lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in soggy wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at peak, cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief bursts into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley that’s peaks at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle up and type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Tue Mar 18 17:16:37 2025
    On 3/18/2025 4:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as >>> space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to >>> transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is >>> low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or >>> close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually
    cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with >>> drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get >>> brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario >>> would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is
    not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well as its cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum brakes which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and indeed lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as it is! The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in soggy wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at peak, cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief bursts into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley that’s peaks at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle up and type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman



    Gearshift? I thought electric autos didn't have those.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Wed Mar 19 06:31:22 2025
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 4:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or >>>> close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance >>> tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario >>>> would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well as its >> cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum brakes >> which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and indeed >> lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as it is! >> The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in soggy >> wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at peak, >> cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief bursts >> into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle up and >> type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman



    Gearshift? I thought electric autos didn't have those.


    They don’t which would further increase car makers caution ie would be relying on the drum brakes wholly if regen stopped, which might be uncommon
    but not impossible.

    Though conversion generally classics do.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 19 10:35:06 2025
    Am 18.03.2025 um 22:49 schrieb Frank Krygowski:
    On 3/18/2025 12:20 PM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 18.03.2025 um 16:08 schrieb Radey Shouman:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    And that regeneration [braking] though powerful only works if
    the it has somewhere to transfer the power to, so if the
    battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is low the braking
    performance would decrease and if the battery is full or close
    to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not
    usually cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required,
    but performance tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use
    them all the time.

    As with a gas tank gauge reading "E" while there's still a gallon
    available, I'm willing to bet that "100% charge" on my EV's screen
    is not the absolute maximum battery capacity. I've seen online
    discussions speculating on the size of that reserve overhead, but no definitive numbers yet.

    And I can't imagine that any typical use of brakes would push the regeneration over some limit. While I've never driven this car down
    a genuine mountain, I've done some fairly long downhills. The "guess-
    o- meter" showing estimated range has risen slightly during such
    descents, but never an impressive amount.

    Just remember: when "destination charging" at the ski resort, put
    a stop below 80% full!
    The main reason to charge to only 80% is that on most EVs the
    charge rate decreases markedly once you hit 80% capacity.

    My recommendation comes from experience. When the battery management
    restricts the charge rate to 11kW to protect the battery, you can bet
    that this restricts (long-term) regenerative braking to 11kW (plus
    whatever energy the heating as able to burn) as well.
    My car then brings a warning message when I put one-pedal driving to high-resistance, and having to brake downhill before each corner rather
    than lift the accelarator from the pedal feels very old-fashioned. Done
    once, will not happen a second time.

    You can waste a lot of time (and annoy anyone who may be waiting to
    use the charger) while getting very little additional range.

    I was using the phrase "destination charging" for "AC charging on an
    outlet on a long-term parking lot". When using the charger on the
    parking lot of the base station, nobody expects me to return before
    16:00 at the end of the skiing session; it does not matter whether the
    car stops charging at 80% at noon or when full at 13:00; there will be
    nobody arriving in search for a slow charger at that time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Wed Mar 19 09:11:39 2025
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as >>> space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to >>> transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is >>> low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or >>> close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually
    cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with >>> drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get >>> brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario >>> would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is
    not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche and
    Audi, I believe?)


    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well as its cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum brakes which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and indeed lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as it is! The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in soggy wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at peak, cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief bursts into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley that’s peaks at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle up and type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman




    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Wed Mar 19 11:37:50 2025
    On 3/19/2025 10:39 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the
    above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>>> always rusty.  They report having brake work done more often
    than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application.  I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>> which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating might even be >>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge
    rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not
    usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but
    performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >>> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars.  I think >>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe.  Electric vehicles, >>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for
    unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc
    brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche
    and Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels. https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/ comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/


    My point was that they don't have multiple ratios, as roger inferred
    with "just don't use the gears" which I read as 'don't shift the gears'.
    Of course with a fixed reduction system, it's not possible to _not_ use
    the gears.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 19 17:29:49 2025
    Am 19.03.2025 um 16:21 schrieb Frank Krygowski:
    On 3/19/2025 5:35 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 18.03.2025 um 22:49 schrieb Frank Krygowski:

    You can waste a lot of time (and annoy anyone who may be waiting to
    use the charger) while getting very little additional range.

    I was using the phrase "destination charging" for "AC charging on an
    outlet on a long-term parking lot".  When using the charger on the
    parking lot of the base station, nobody expects me to return before
    16:00 at the end of the skiing session; it does not matter whether the
    car stops charging at 80% at noon or when full at 13:00; there will be
    nobody arriving in search for a slow charger at that time.

    I don't know how common charging stations are where you live, but around
    here they are still spread pretty thin. It's considered very bad form to
    be plugged in and taking that space if your EV is not actively charging.

    Generally it's the same here, especially for high-speed DC charging.
    The "destination" scenario is restricted to semi-public charging
    stations e.g. overnight charging at a hotel, charging during the working
    day at the company car park or at the long-term car park of the commuter railway station and charging during a day of skiing are the typical
    situations where you wish to re-charge while you're away from the car or
    a long time.

    I've almost never needed to use a public charger, but my understanding
    is that some (maybe most?) will bill you at a very high per minute rate
    if you're not actively charging.

    Introduction of per-minute penalty rates (in Europe around 2021-2022)
    mostly destroyed the "destination" scenario.
    Sometimes these penalty rates do not apply for overnight charging,
    keeping at least the "hotel" scenario active.

    The technical implementation penalizes people charging for a long time
    rather than people not moving the car when the battery is full (because
    usually the handshake "now stop charging" automatically generated the
    billing document, so penalty time can only be racked up while the car is charging).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Zen Cycle on Wed Mar 19 17:07:56 2025
    Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 10:39 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the
    above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>>>> always rusty.  They report having brake work done more often >>>>>>>>> than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application.  I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>>> which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating might even be >>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge >>>>>> rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not
    usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but
    performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >>>> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods >>>>> vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars.  I think >>>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe.  Electric vehicles, >>>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for
    unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs are less than >>>>> safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc
    brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche
    and Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/
    comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/


    My point was that they don't have multiple ratios, as roger inferred
    with "just don't use the gears" which I read as 'don't shift the gears'.
    Of course with a fixed reduction system, it's not possible to _not_ use
    the gears.


    Sorry yes should, of been clearer I was switching between EV and ICE cars.

    And yes EV tend to have a fixed reduction, vs ICE cars multiple ratios due
    to the difference in torque and how it’s delivered, ie EV tend not to need multiple ratios.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Radey Shouman@21:1/5 to Rolf Mantel on Wed Mar 19 17:42:40 2025
    Rolf Mantel <news@hartig-mantel.de> writes:

    Am 18.03.2025 um 16:08 schrieb Radey Shouman:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as >>> space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to >>> transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is >>> low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or >>> close to, it has nowhere to regen to.
    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not
    usually
    cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    Just remember: when "destination charging" at the ski resort, put a
    stop below 80% full!

    Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.
    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.

    On mountain roads, you have to rely on good brakes.

    I would think that regenerative braking take most of the load on
    mountain descents, but I don't speak from experience. Certainly good mechanical brakes have to be available, and rust is a problem for that.

    As of today, electric cars rarely drive faster than 80-90 mph on the
    autobahn but once you have a 600 mile range at 60 mph the driving will
    become similar to other cars. My company will only offer electric
    company cars from 2026 onwards, and our sales reps are know to be
    among the most ruthless drivers on the German autobahn.

    Aggressive driving requires hard braking, which will involve the
    mechanical brakes even on electric vehicles.

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Radey Shouman@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Wed Mar 19 17:46:55 2025
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as >>> space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to >>> transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is >>> low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or >>> close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually
    cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with >>> drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get >>> brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario >>> would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is
    not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well as its cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum brakes which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and indeed lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as it is! The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in soggy wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at peak, cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief bursts into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different. I get audibly rusty discs on my (gas powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley that’s peaks at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle up and type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman



    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to Ted on Wed Mar 19 22:01:00 2025
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:05:23 -0000 (UTC),
    Ted <theise@panix.com> wrote:


    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem
    with a Shimano triple. It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the
    thumb lever has stopped returning to the neutral position after
    being pressed. I've lubed the heck out of it, and it seems it
    may be getting very slightly better--but I'm wondering if it
    may be likely that something has broken inside the brifter. Any
    tips for restoring full function (all else is fine), or am I
    destined to get a new one?

    Sorry to derail (so to speak) all the battery discussion, but
    here's an update on the front derailer matter.

    I got in a Tiagra ST-4703-L and FD-4703 and installed them on the
    Santana team Ti this afternoon. I was worried that it might not
    shift down onto my 26 tooth small ring, but that seems to be okay.

    On the other hand, it's tough to get it onto the 50 tooth large
    ring, even with the limit screw wide open and the cable as tight
    as it'll go. When I can get it shifted onto the large ring, the
    cage rubs on the chain. I've tried rotating the derailer a bit
    each way about the seat tube, but it doesn't seem to help. My
    conclusion is that the chain ring(s) just sit too far outboard,
    but there's probably better knowledge here.

    Also, when I got the Ergo lever off, the return spring for the
    thumb lever started working--partially. The lever still hangs
    limp after pressing it as many as four clicks, but it'll now
    return after pressing it to the limit. So maybe part of the
    spring must still is still rusted in position? In any case, I'm
    thinking to send the thing to Andrew for a rebuild. I'm pretty
    sure I'd just mess it up.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Wed Mar 19 17:20:34 2025
    On 3/19/2025 5:01 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:05:23 -0000 (UTC),
    Ted <theise@panix.com> wrote:


    Okay, I'm running a Campy Chorus rear derailer on my tandem
    with a Shimano triple. It's a 9-speed vintage. Recently the
    thumb lever has stopped returning to the neutral position after
    being pressed. I've lubed the heck out of it, and it seems it
    may be getting very slightly better--but I'm wondering if it
    may be likely that something has broken inside the brifter. Any
    tips for restoring full function (all else is fine), or am I
    destined to get a new one?

    Sorry to derail (so to speak) all the battery discussion, but
    here's an update on the front derailer matter.

    I got in a Tiagra ST-4703-L and FD-4703 and installed them on the
    Santana team Ti this afternoon. I was worried that it might not
    shift down onto my 26 tooth small ring, but that seems to be okay.

    On the other hand, it's tough to get it onto the 50 tooth large
    ring, even with the limit screw wide open and the cable as tight
    as it'll go. When I can get it shifted onto the large ring, the
    cage rubs on the chain. I've tried rotating the derailer a bit
    each way about the seat tube, but it doesn't seem to help. My
    conclusion is that the chain ring(s) just sit too far outboard,
    but there's probably better knowledge here.

    Also, when I got the Ergo lever off, the return spring for the
    thumb lever started working--partially. The lever still hangs
    limp after pressing it as many as four clicks, but it'll now
    return after pressing it to the limit. So maybe part of the
    spring must still is still rusted in position? In any case, I'm
    thinking to send the thing to Andrew for a rebuild. I'm pretty
    sure I'd just mess it up.


    Sounds like you're making progress against the typical rust
    and crud in that return lever pivot. Since it's off the
    bike, you might try working it more and, if you have
    compressed air, spray it clean, add rust breaker, repeat.

    Odd thing about (relatively) modern triple front changers
    and chainline. Shimanos are tight to reach the high rings
    while the Campagnolo triples are a bit limited for a
    positive shift into the low gears.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to Radey Shouman on Thu Mar 20 00:00:01 2025
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or >>>> close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance >>> tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario >>>> would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a fixed reduction.

    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine braking, is a wise choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as the smaller roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a few miles and 5/10% aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of the longer but
    closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be particularly demanding it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes quickly, and likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though perhaps taking it relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well as its >> cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum brakes >> which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and indeed >> lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as it is! >> The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in soggy >> wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at peak, >> cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief bursts >> into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different. I get audibly rusty discs on my (gas powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick grind but is clear after first application, london is on the whole soggy and has been the
    wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle up and >> type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman



    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Roger Merriman on Wed Mar 19 19:26:41 2025
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic >>>>>>>>> under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they >>>>>>>> recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>>>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or >>>>> close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance >>>> tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >>> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario >>>>> would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, >>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a fixed reduction.

    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine braking, is a wise choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as the smaller roads are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a few miles and 5/10% aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of the longer but closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be particularly demanding it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes quickly, and likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though perhaps taking it relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well as its >>> cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum brakes >>> which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and indeed >>> lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as it is! >>> The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief bursts >>> into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different. I get audibly rusty discs on my (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick grind but is clear after first application, london is on the whole soggy and has been the wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle up and >>> type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman



    Roger Merriman



    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming
    causes drought', you need only wait a minute for relief. I'm
    assisting that with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 14:28:33 2025
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the
    above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks >>>>>>>>> are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work done more often >>>>>>>>> than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical >>>>>>>>> brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application.  I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>>> which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating might even be >>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and
    charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not
    usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but
    performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed
    them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods >>>>> vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars.  I think >>>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe.  Electric vehicles, >>>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for
    unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs are less than >>>>> safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc
    brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a fixed reduction.

    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine braking, is a wise >> choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as the smaller
    roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a few miles and
    5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of the longer but
    closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be particularly
    demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes quickly, and
    likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though perhaps taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well
    as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum
    brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars >>>> half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and
    indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as
    it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in >>>> soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at >>>> peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief
    bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty discs on my (gas >>> powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick grind but is
    clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy and has been the
    wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley
    that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle
    up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming causes
    drought', you need only wait a minute for relief. I'm assisting that
    with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that 'Global Warming
    causes drought'. The claim is 'Global Warming exaggerates weather
    extremes', which is drought for a few years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of tornadoes and more
    winters with -40 where snow falls further south ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Mar 20 13:50:32 2025
    On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:20:34 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 5:01 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:05:23 -0000 (UTC),

    I got in a Tiagra ST-4703-L and FD-4703 and installed them on
    the Santana team Ti this afternoon. I was worried that it
    might not shift down onto my 26 tooth small ring, but that
    seems to be okay.

    On the other hand, it's tough to get it onto the 50 tooth
    large ring, even with the limit screw wide open and the cable
    as tight as it'll go. When I can get it shifted onto the
    large ring, the cage rubs on the chain. I've tried rotating
    the derailer a bit each way about the seat tube, but it
    doesn't seem to help. My conclusion is that the chain ring(s)
    just sit too far outboard, but there's probably better
    knowledge here.

    Also, when I got the Ergo lever off, the return spring for the
    thumb lever started working--partially. The lever still hangs
    limp after pressing it as many as four clicks, but it'll now
    return after pressing it to the limit. So maybe part of the
    spring must still is still rusted in position? In any case,
    I'm thinking to send the thing to Andrew for a rebuild. I'm
    pretty sure I'd just mess it up.

    Sounds like you're making progress against the typical rust and
    crud in that return lever pivot. Since it's off the bike, you
    might try working it more and, if you have compressed air,
    spray it clean, add rust breaker, repeat.

    A bit more progress this morning. Slowly. Slowly.


    Odd thing about (relatively) modern triple front changers and
    chainline. Shimanos are tight to reach the high rings while the
    Campagnolo triples are a bit limited for a positive shift into
    the low gears.

    Is there any kind of way to put a shim inside the derailer clamp
    on the drive side of the seat post to move it slightly outboard?
    Maybe that would compromise the clamping.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Thu Mar 20 13:56:25 2025
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:50:32 -0000 (UTC),
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:20:34 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 5:01 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:05:23 -0000 (UTC),

    I got in a Tiagra ST-4703-L and FD-4703 and installed them on
    the Santana team Ti this afternoon. I was worried that it
    might not shift down onto my 26 tooth small ring, but that
    seems to be okay.

    On the other hand, it's tough to get it onto the 50 tooth
    large ring, even with the limit screw wide open and the cable
    as tight as it'll go. When I can get it shifted onto the
    large ring, the cage rubs on the chain. I've tried rotating
    the derailer a bit each way about the seat tube, but it
    doesn't seem to help. My conclusion is that the chain ring(s)
    just sit too far outboard, but there's probably better
    knowledge here.

    Also, when I got the Ergo lever off, the return spring for the
    thumb lever started working--partially. The lever still hangs
    limp after pressing it as many as four clicks, but it'll now
    return after pressing it to the limit. So maybe part of the
    spring must still is still rusted in position? In any case,
    I'm thinking to send the thing to Andrew for a rebuild. I'm
    pretty sure I'd just mess it up.

    Sounds like you're making progress against the typical rust and
    crud in that return lever pivot. Since it's off the bike, you
    might try working it more and, if you have compressed air,
    spray it clean, add rust breaker, repeat.

    A bit more progress this morning. Slowly. Slowly.


    Odd thing about (relatively) modern triple front changers and
    chainline. Shimanos are tight to reach the high rings while the
    Campagnolo triples are a bit limited for a positive shift into
    the low gears.

    Is there any kind of way to put a shim inside the derailer clamp
    on the drive side of the seat post to move it slightly outboard?
    Maybe that would compromise the clamping.

    Oh, I also meant to ask what you thought of going back to the old
    Ultegra derailer with the new shift lever? It obviously has
    enough extension to work well with the large ring, and the lever
    arm looks to be about the same length as the new Tiagra.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Mar 20 14:45:41 2025
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:32:30 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:50:32 -0000 (UTC),
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> wrote:

    Is there any kind of way to put a shim inside the derailer
    clamp on the drive side of the seat post to move it
    slightly outboard? Maybe that would compromise the
    clamping.

    Thoughts on a shim? Crazy?


    Oh, I also meant to ask what you thought of going back to the
    old Ultegra derailer with the new shift lever? It obviously
    has enough extension to work well with the large ring, and the
    lever arm looks to be about the same length as the new Tiagra.

    I don't know.
    Quick to just install it and see.

    LOL. Quick, for someone who knows what they're doing.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Thu Mar 20 09:32:30 2025
    On 3/20/2025 8:56 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:50:32 -0000 (UTC),
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> wrote:
    On Wed, 19 Mar 2025 17:20:34 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 5:01 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Tue, 11 Mar 2025 16:05:23 -0000 (UTC),

    I got in a Tiagra ST-4703-L and FD-4703 and installed them on
    the Santana team Ti this afternoon. I was worried that it
    might not shift down onto my 26 tooth small ring, but that
    seems to be okay.

    On the other hand, it's tough to get it onto the 50 tooth
    large ring, even with the limit screw wide open and the cable
    as tight as it'll go. When I can get it shifted onto the
    large ring, the cage rubs on the chain. I've tried rotating
    the derailer a bit each way about the seat tube, but it
    doesn't seem to help. My conclusion is that the chain ring(s)
    just sit too far outboard, but there's probably better
    knowledge here.

    Also, when I got the Ergo lever off, the return spring for the
    thumb lever started working--partially. The lever still hangs
    limp after pressing it as many as four clicks, but it'll now
    return after pressing it to the limit. So maybe part of the
    spring must still is still rusted in position? In any case,
    I'm thinking to send the thing to Andrew for a rebuild. I'm
    pretty sure I'd just mess it up.

    Sounds like you're making progress against the typical rust and
    crud in that return lever pivot. Since it's off the bike, you
    might try working it more and, if you have compressed air,
    spray it clean, add rust breaker, repeat.

    A bit more progress this morning. Slowly. Slowly.


    Odd thing about (relatively) modern triple front changers and
    chainline. Shimanos are tight to reach the high rings while the
    Campagnolo triples are a bit limited for a positive shift into
    the low gears.

    Is there any kind of way to put a shim inside the derailer clamp
    on the drive side of the seat post to move it slightly outboard?
    Maybe that would compromise the clamping.

    Oh, I also meant to ask what you thought of going back to the old
    Ultegra derailer with the new shift lever? It obviously has
    enough extension to work well with the large ring, and the lever
    arm looks to be about the same length as the new Tiagra.


    I don't know.
    Quick to just install it and see.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Rolf Mantel on Thu Mar 20 09:50:20 2025
    On 3/20/2025 8:28 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like
    that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain
    because of the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to
    replace brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely
    uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with
    electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem,
    because the disks are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work done
    more often than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the
    mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a
    2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that
    problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a
    software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would
    temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with
    just friction braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember
    if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver
    had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on
    how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been
    happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the
    accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the
    scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems
    to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better
    fit for the
    application.  I suppose they might get just as
    rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating
    might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to
    the larger size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if
    the it has somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or
    hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the
    battery is full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full,
    and it's not usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely
    required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all
    the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone
    has prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or
    fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T
    plus, in the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and
    even so you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular
    for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger
    cars.  I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a
    fairly unlikely scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe.
    Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical
    brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs
    are less than
    safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under
    ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could,
    in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are
    little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection
    of disc brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears",
    ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is
    required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be
    driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an
    issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the
    gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a
    fixed reduction.

    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine
    braking, is a wise
    choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as
    the smaller roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a
    few miles and 5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of
    the longer but
    closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and
    so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be
    particularly demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes
    quickly, and
    likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though
    perhaps taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not
    work as well as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill,
    relying on drum brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably
    quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine
    problems and indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one
    car per year as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty
    discs even in soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill!
    It’s 25% ish at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st
    gear with brief bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty
    discs on my (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of
    year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick
    grind but is clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy and
    has been the
    wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the
    valley that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly
    painful to cycle up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming
    causes drought', you need only wait a minute for relief.
    I'm assisting that with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that 'Global
    Warming causes drought'.  The claim is 'Global Warming
    exaggerates weather extremes', which is drought for a few
    years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of tornadoes
    and more winters with -40 where snow falls further south ;-)


    Yes, we do indeed have winters with excessive snow. And
    winters with scant snow. There are years with extended
    brutal cold and winters which are mild. We have years with
    more tornados and years with fewer. In Wisconsin, what we do
    not have is Global Warming.

    Oh, and about that purported 'climate change':

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/08/120_years_of_climate_scares.html#ixzz61lNpThFF

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rolf Mantel@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 16:21:38 2025
    Am 20.03.2025 um 15:50 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/20/2025 8:28 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the >>>>>>>>>>>> above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of >>>>>>>>>>>> the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace >>>>>>>>>>>> brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its >>>>>>>>>>>> brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the >>>>>>>>>>> disks are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work done more often >>>>>>>>>>> than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical >>>>>>>>>>> brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change >>>>>>>>>> that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily >>>>>>>>>> turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction >>>>>>>>>> braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do >>>>>>>>>> something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy
    enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure >>>>>>>>>> the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the >>>>>>>>> application.  I suppose they might get just as rusty, but
    invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating might even be >>>>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger >>>>>>>> size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has >>>>>>>> somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and
    charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is >>>>>>>> full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not >>>>>>> usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but
    performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has
    prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in
    the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so
    you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy
    goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars.  I >>>>>>> think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely >>>>>>>> scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric
    vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for >>>>>>> unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs are less than >>>>>>> safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal
    conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then >>>>>>> heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc
    brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is required. >>>>>>>
    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most >>>>>>> users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>>>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a fixed reduction. >>>>
    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine braking, is a >>>> wise
    choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as the smaller
    roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a few miles and
    5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of the longer but >>>> closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and so on, but
    even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be particularly
    demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes quickly, and >>>> likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though perhaps
    taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as
    well as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on
    drum brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with >>>>>> cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and >>>>>> indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year
    as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in >>>>>> soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish >>>>>> at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with
    brief bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty discs on my
    (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick grind but
    is clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy and has been the >>>> wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley
    that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to
    cycle up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming causes
    drought', you need only wait a minute for relief. I'm assisting that
    with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that 'Global Warming
    causes drought'.  The claim is 'Global Warming exaggerates weather
    extremes', which is drought for a few years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of tornadoes and more
    winters with -40 where snow falls further south ;-)

    Yes, we do indeed have winters with excessive snow. And winters with
    scant snow.  There are years with extended brutal cold and winters which
    are mild. We have years with more tornados and years with fewer.

    Right; this is due to the wanderings of the Jet Stream (Jet Stream in Wisnconsin brings snow in Wisconsin, Jet Stream 300 miles further south
    like 1997 brings show in Iowa and arctic air with -40 degrees and very
    little snow in Minnesota and Wisconsin).

    The main energy source of the Jet Stream is the temperature differential between the arctic region. This temperature differential has reduced a
    lot in the last two decades. The exact impact of this is not understood
    yet. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/jet-stream-will-get-faster-climate-change-continues-study-finds

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Mar 20 11:46:58 2025
    On 3/19/2025 8:26 PM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the
    above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks >>>>>>>>> are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work done more often >>>>>>>>> than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical >>>>>>>>> brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application.  I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>>> which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating might even be >>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and
    charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not
    usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but
    performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed
    them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods >>>>> vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars.  I think >>>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe.  Electric vehicles, >>>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for
    unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs are less than >>>>> safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc
    brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a fixed reduction.

    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine braking, is a wise >> choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as the smaller
    roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a few miles and
    5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of the longer but
    closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be particularly
    demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes quickly, and
    likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though perhaps taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well
    as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum
    brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars >>>> half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and
    indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as
    it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in >>>> soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at >>>> peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief
    bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty discs on my (gas >>> powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick grind but is
    clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy and has been the
    wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley
    that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle
    up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman



    Roger Merriman



    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming causes
    drought'

    - I've never hear of any "green religion"
    - AGW theory doesn't claim 'global warming causes drought'. It claims
    more extremes, including areas with heavier rainfall amounts and areas
    with more droughts. London is predicted to become warmer and wetter.

    Try again.

    , you need only wait a minute for relief. I'm assisting that
    with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    In minnesota you're likely contributing to more polar vorteces. No thank
    you.

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Mar 20 11:48:11 2025
    On 3/20/2025 10:50 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 8:28 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the >>>>>>>>>>>> above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of >>>>>>>>>>>> the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace >>>>>>>>>>>> brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its >>>>>>>>>>>> brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the >>>>>>>>>>> disks are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work done more often >>>>>>>>>>> than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical >>>>>>>>>>> brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change >>>>>>>>>> that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily >>>>>>>>>> turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction >>>>>>>>>> braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do >>>>>>>>>> something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy
    enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure >>>>>>>>>> the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the >>>>>>>>> application.  I suppose they might get just as rusty, but
    invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating might even be >>>>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger >>>>>>>> size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has >>>>>>>> somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and
    charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is >>>>>>>> full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not >>>>>>> usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but
    performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has
    prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in
    the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so
    you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy
    goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars.  I >>>>>>> think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely >>>>>>>> scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric
    vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for >>>>>>> unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs are less than >>>>>>> safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal
    conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then >>>>>>> heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc
    brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is required. >>>>>>>
    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most >>>>>>> users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>>>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a fixed reduction. >>>>
    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine braking, is a >>>> wise
    choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as the smaller
    roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a few miles and
    5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of the longer but >>>> closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and so on, but
    even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be particularly
    demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes quickly, and >>>> likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though perhaps
    taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as
    well as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on
    drum brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with >>>>>> cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and >>>>>> indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year
    as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in >>>>>> soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish >>>>>> at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with
    brief bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty discs on my
    (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick grind but
    is clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy and has been the >>>> wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley
    that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to
    cycle up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming causes
    drought', you need only wait a minute for relief. I'm assisting that
    with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that 'Global Warming
    causes drought'.  The claim is 'Global Warming exaggerates weather
    extremes', which is drought for a few years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of tornadoes and more
    winters with -40 where snow falls further south ;-)


    Yes, we do indeed have winters with excessive snow. And winters with
    scant snow.  There are years with extended brutal cold and winters which
    are mild. We have years with more tornados and years with fewer. In Wisconsin, what we do not have is Global Warming.

    Oh, and about that purported 'climate change':

    https://www.americanthinker.com/ blog/2014/08/120_years_of_climate_scares.html#ixzz61lNpThFF

    Mis-titled...Should be "American Non-thinker"




    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Thu Mar 20 10:49:10 2025
    On 3/20/2025 9:45 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:32:30 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:50:32 -0000 (UTC),
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> wrote:

    Is there any kind of way to put a shim inside the derailer
    clamp on the drive side of the seat post to move it
    slightly outboard? Maybe that would compromise the
    clamping.

    Thoughts on a shim? Crazy?


    Oh, I also meant to ask what you thought of going back to the
    old Ultegra derailer with the new shift lever? It obviously
    has enough extension to work well with the large ring, and the
    lever arm looks to be about the same length as the new Tiagra.

    I don't know.
    Quick to just install it and see.

    LOL. Quick, for someone who knows what they're doing.


    No, the band is the same size as the frame tube.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to John B. on Thu Mar 20 10:52:41 2025
    On 3/20/2025 10:04 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:50:20 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 3/20/2025 8:28 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like
    that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain
    because of the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to
    replace brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely
    uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with
    electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem,
    because the disks are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work done
    more often than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the
    mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a
    2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that
    problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a
    software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would
    temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with
    just friction braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember
    if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver
    had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on
    how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been
    happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the
    accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the
    scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems
    to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better
    fit for the
    application.  I suppose they might get just as
    rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating
    might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to
    the larger size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if
    the it has somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or
    hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the
    battery is full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full,
    and it's not usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely
    required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all
    the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone
    has prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or
    fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T
    plus, in the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and
    even so you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular
    for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger
    cars.  I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a
    fairly unlikely scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe.
    Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical
    brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs
    are less than
    safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under
    ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could,
    in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are
    little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection
    of disc brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears",
    ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is
    required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be
    driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an
    issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the
    gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a
    fixed reduction.

    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine
    braking, is a wise
    choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as
    the smaller roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a
    few miles and 5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of
    the longer but
    closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and
    so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be
    particularly demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes
    quickly, and
    likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though
    perhaps taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not
    work as well as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill,
    relying on drum brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably
    quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine
    problems and indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one
    car per year as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty
    discs even in soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill!
    It’s 25% ish at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st
    gear with brief bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty
    discs on my (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of
    year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick
    grind but is clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy and
    has been the
    wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the
    valley that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly
    painful to cycle up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming
    causes drought', you need only wait a minute for relief.
    I'm assisting that with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that 'Global
    Warming causes drought'.  The claim is 'Global Warming
    exaggerates weather extremes', which is drought for a few
    years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of tornadoes
    and more winters with -40 where snow falls further south ;-)


    Yes, we do indeed have winters with excessive snow. And
    winters with scant snow. There are years with extended
    brutal cold and winters which are mild. We have years with
    more tornados and years with fewer. In Wisconsin, what we do
    not have is Global Warming.

    Oh, and about that purported 'climate change':

    https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/08/120_years_of_climate_scares.html#ixzz61lNpThFF


    On the other hand the seas are rising -

    Florida's Sea Level Is Rising
    And It's Costing Over $4 Billion
    https://sealevelrise.org/states/florida/

    I don't know about Florida.

    As discussed here earlier, the 'sea level rise' of San
    Francisco Bay area is actually geologic subsidence. The
    orogeny is several hundred miles east).

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Rolf Mantel on Thu Mar 20 10:54:49 2025
    On 3/20/2025 10:21 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 15:50 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/20/2025 8:28 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like
    that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain
    because of the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have
    to replace brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely
    uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with
    electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem,
    because the disks are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work
    done more often than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply
    the mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a
    2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that
    problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a
    software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would
    temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with
    just friction braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't
    remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver
    had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details
    on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've
    been happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the
    accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the
    scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it
    seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better
    fit for the
    application.  I suppose they might get just as
    rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement.  Electric
    heating might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend
    to the larger size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if
    the it has somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or
    hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if
    the battery is full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full,
    and it's not usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely
    required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them
    all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone
    has prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or
    fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car
    2T plus, in the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton,
    and even so you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained
    popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on
    passenger cars.  I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a
    fairly unlikely scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe.
    Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the
    mechanical brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty
    discs are less than
    safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective
    under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could,
    in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are
    little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat
    rejection of disc brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the
    gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement
    is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can*
    be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an
    issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the
    gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a
    fixed reduction.

    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine
    braking, is a wise
    choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which
    as the smaller roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a
    few miles and 5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of
    the longer but
    closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners
    and so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be
    particularly demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up
    brakes quickly, and
    likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though
    perhaps taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will
    not work as well as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill,
    relying on drum brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably
    quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine
    problems and indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one
    car per year as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty
    discs even in soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill!
    It’s 25% ish at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st
    gear with brief bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty
    discs on my (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time
    of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have
    quick grind but is clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy
    and has been the
    wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of
    the valley that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly
    painful to cycle up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global
    Warming causes drought', you need only wait a minute for
    relief. I'm assisting that with my four carburetors.
    You're welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that
    'Global Warming causes drought'.  The claim is 'Global
    Warming exaggerates weather extremes', which is drought
    for a few years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of
    tornadoes and more winters with -40 where snow falls
    further south ;-)

    Yes, we do indeed have winters with excessive snow. And
    winters with scant snow.  There are years with extended
    brutal cold and winters which are mild. We have years with
    more tornados and years with fewer.

    Right; this is due to the wanderings of the Jet Stream (Jet
    Stream in Wisnconsin brings snow in Wisconsin, Jet Stream
    300 miles further south like 1997 brings show in Iowa and
    arctic air with -40 degrees and very little snow in
    Minnesota and Wisconsin).

    The main energy source of the Jet Stream is the temperature
    differential between the arctic region.  This temperature
    differential has reduced a lot in the last two decades.  The
    exact impact of this is not understood yet. https://news.uchicago.edu/story/jet-stream-will-get-faster- climate-change-continues-study-finds





    Yes, that's exactly right.

    'Not understood' systems are less than ideal areas for
    prediction. As evidenced.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 16:40:05 2025
    On Wed Mar 19 10:39:49 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than >>>>>>> they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size?s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge
    rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn?t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think >>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, >>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don?t need to drive aggressively, just don?t use the gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I?m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche and Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels. https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/




    Because of the opposite torque curve you have a step down transmission for an EV rather than the step up transmission of the ICE Because of the highRPM's of the EV the bearings get a lot of wear. But because those are the only wearing c0omponents total
    maintenance is a lot less..

    We estimate Tesla s new carbon sleeved motor has a 23,308 RPM redline@200 MPH compared to the P100D redline of 18000 RPM@155 MPH, as well as gear ratios the same as P100D.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 16:32:08 2025
    On Wed Mar 19 17:07:56 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 10:39 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the >>>>>>>>>> above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often >>>>>>>>> than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction >>>>>>>> braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do >>>>>>>> something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the >>>>>>> application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size?s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge >>>>>> rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is >>>>>> full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not
    usually
    cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but
    performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >>>> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the >>>>>> past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you >>>>>> could get
    brake fad if you didn?t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods >>>>> vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think >>>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely >>>>>> scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for
    unusual
    or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than >>>>> safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then >>>>> heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc
    brakes is
    not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most >>>>> users don't seem to do that.


    Don?t need to drive aggressively, just don?t use the gears, on steep >>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I?m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche
    and Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/
    comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/


    My point was that they don't have multiple ratios, as roger inferred
    with "just don't use the gears" which I read as 'don't shift the gears'.
    Of course with a fixed reduction system, it's not possible to _not_ use
    the gears.


    Sorry yes should, of been clearer I was switching between EV and ICE cars.

    And yes EV tend to have a fixed reduction, vs ICE cars multiple ratios due
    to the difference in torque and how it?s delivered, ie EV tend not to need multiple ratios.




    You are quite right. Once built an EV is more energy efficient because there are no moving parts to absorb energy. But mining,k purifying or the rare earths and building the batteries generates some 10 times the CO2 as building and running an ICE car.
    And that is from the mouth of Musk. Thgis is why he is seeking to build Graphene batteries.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 16:44:49 2025
    On Wed Mar 19 10:39:49 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than >>>>>>> they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size?s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge
    rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn?t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think >>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, >>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don?t need to drive aggressively, just don?t use the gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I?m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche and Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels. https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/




    Because EV's use step down gears rather than the step up of ICE, that is one of the fastest wearing components of an EV. But since you don't change gears on an EV, gear wear is minimal and the wear is almost entirely on the bearings.

    We estimate Tesla s new carbon sleeved motor has a 23,308 RPM redline@200 MPH compared to the P100D redline of 18000 RPM@155 MPH, as well as gear ratios the same as P100D.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Thu Mar 20 12:11:23 2025
    On 3/20/2025 11:44 AM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Wed Mar 19 10:39:49 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than >>>>>>>>> they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size?s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge >>>>>> rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>>>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance >>>>> tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >>>> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn?t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods >>>>> vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think >>>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, >>>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>>>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>>>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don?t need to drive aggressively, just don?t use the gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I?m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche and >>> Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/




    Because EV's use step down gears rather than the step up of ICE, that is one of the fastest wearing components of an EV. But since you don't change gears on an EV, gear wear is minimal and the wear is almost entirely on the bearings.

    We estimate Teslas new carbon sleeved motor has a 23,308 RPM redline@200 MPH compared to the P100D redline of 18000 RPM@155 MPH, as well as gear ratios the same as P100D.

    All my gasoline powered autos gear down from engine rpm to
    wheels.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 20 16:49:26 2025
    On Wed Mar 19 10:39:49 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than >>>>>>> they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size?s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge
    rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn?t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think >>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, >>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don?t need to drive aggressively, just don?t use the gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I?m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche and Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels. https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/




    Quite correct, but you don't change gears so the only wear is on the bearings.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Mar 20 11:13:30 2025
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:52:41 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    As discussed here earlier, the 'sea level rise' of San
    Francisco Bay area is actually geologic subsidence. The
    orogeny is several hundred miles east).

    Agreed. I think we went through this previously when Tom claimed that
    he didn't see any sea level rise on a nearby pier or pilings.
    Searching...

    (Feb 15, 2022) <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/4n0Lzpp8Lxc/m/kNt7yjkoBgAJ> "The local TV station had a program about the building of the San
    Francisco sea wall which was built to allow the filling in of what
    became the financial district in San Francisco. After years of
    claiming sea level rise, in the old photos and even films you could
    plainly see NO CHANGE in sea level in 100 years."

    100 years at the current rate of about 2 mm/year = 200 mm (7.8 inches)
    sea level rise. Somehow, I suspect that seeing that small a rise in
    old photos and files might be rather difficult.

    More:

    "Global climate change and local land subsidence exacerbate inundation
    risk to the San Francisco Bay Area" <https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aap9234>
    "Most of the Pacific shorelines and areas adjacent to the San
    Francisco Bay are subject to subsidence at less than ~2 mm/year.
    Portions of Treasure Island, San Francisco, San Francisco
    International Airport, and Foster City are subsiding as fast as 10
    mm/year..."

    "Satellite survey shows California's sinking coastal hotspots" <https://phys.org/news/2020-07-satellite-survey-california-coastal-hotspots.html>
    "Land subsidence can occur due to natural and anthropogenic processes
    or a combination of them. The natural processes comprise tectonics,
    glacial isostatic adjustment, sediment loading, and soil compaction.
    The anthropogenic causes include groundwater extraction and oil and
    gas production."

    "Tracking California’s sinking coast from space: Implications for
    relative sea-level rise"
    <https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aba4551>
    "The subsidence around the banks of the San Francisco Bay (Fig. 3A) is
    largely influenced by the tectonics of the region, primarily the San
    Andreas Fault. It also is influenced by sediment compaction of the
    landfill and Bay Mud deposits..."



    --
    Jeff Liebermann jeffl@cruzio.com
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to cyclintom on Thu Mar 20 14:03:58 2025
    On 3/20/2025 12:44 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Wed Mar 19 10:39:49 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than >>>>>>>>> they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction
    braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size?s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge >>>>>> rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is
    full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>>>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance >>>>> tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >>>> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the
    past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you
    could get
    brake fad if you didn?t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods >>>>> vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think >>>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely
    scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, >>>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>>>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>>>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don?t need to drive aggressively, just don?t use the gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I?m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche and >>> Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/




    Because EV's use step down gears rather than the step up of ICE, that is one of the fastest wearing components of an EV.

    All gas powered automobiles step down the gearing except for usually the
    final ratio.

    But since you don't change gears on an EV, gear wear is minimal and the wear is almost entirely on the bearings.

    Complete hogwash. Gears in an EV transmission are no less subject to
    wear than the bearings.


    We estimate Teslas new carbon sleeved motor has a 23,308 RPM redline@200 MPH compared to the P100D redline of 18000 RPM@155 MPH, as well as gear ratios the same as P100D.

    You forgot to copy and paste the rest of that paragraph from the website
    where you stole it without attribution.

    https://insideevs.com/news/514385/tesla-models-plaid-engineering-analysis/

    "Our performance model closely duplicated what Elon gave us for
    acceleration times. We can estimate gear ratios and max motor RPM with
    our performance model. We estimate Tesla’s new carbon sleeved motor has
    a 23,308 RPM redline@200 MPH compared to the P100D redline of 18000
    RPM@155 MPH, as well as gear ratios the same as P100D."



    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Thu Mar 20 14:33:04 2025
    On 3/20/2025 11:52 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 10:04 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:50:20 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 3/20/2025 8:28 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming
    causes drought', you need only wait a minute for relief.
    I'm assisting that with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that 'Global
    Warming causes drought'.  The claim is 'Global Warming
    exaggerates weather extremes', which is drought for a few
    years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of tornadoes
    and more winters with -40 where snow falls further south ;-)


    Yes, we do indeed have winters with excessive snow. And
    winters with scant snow.  There are years with extended
    brutal cold and winters which are mild. We have years with
    more tornados and years with fewer. In Wisconsin, what we do
    not have is Global Warming.

    Oh, and about that purported 'climate change':

    https://www.americanthinker.com/
    blog/2014/08/120_years_of_climate_scares.html#ixzz61lNpThFF


    On the other hand the seas are rising -

    Florida's Sea Level Is Rising
    And It's Costing Over $4 Billion
    https://sealevelrise.org/states/florida/

    I don't know about Florida.

    As discussed here earlier, the 'sea level rise' of San Francisco Bay
    area is actually geologic subsidence.

    Nope...

    https://pacinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/sea_level_rise_sf_bay_cec3.pdf

    "4.1 Conclusions
    Rising sea levels will be among the most significant impacts of climate
    change to California."

    https://www.ppic.org/publication/sea-level-rise-in-california/
    "Sea levels are rising due to increasing temperatures from climate change."

    https://www.bayadapt.org/a-rising-bay/
    "San Francisco Bay, fed by a swelling Pacific and melting glaciers and
    ice sheets, is growing."

    Subsidence is a issue in localized areas due to a number of factors, but
    the most extreme cases are in fact anthropogenic:

    https://www.livescience.com/planet-earth/parts-of-san-francisco-and-los-angeles-are-sinking-into-the-sea-meaning-sea-level-rise-will-be-even-worse

    "In sinking hotspots like San Rafael and Foster City in the San
    Francisco Bay Area, the ground is dropping by more than 0.4 inches (10 millimeters) per year.....Both of these hotspots were partially built on landfill."

    and

    "The sinking was the most extreme in central California, where
    aggressive groundwater pumping lowers parts of the Central Valley by as
    much as 8 inches (20 cm) each year."

    Subsidence is _a_ factor in certain locations, far from _the_ factor.

    The orogeny is several hundred
    miles east).

    Aside from the fact that orogeny results in land _rising_ (subduction
    might be a more appropriate term), sinking due to tectonic shifts is not generally considered by any reputable science to be a significant
    factor. Even with ocean-continent subduction The earth surface that
    sinks is off the coast - the above-sea-level earth rises.

    Try again....

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Thu Mar 20 14:36:46 2025
    On 3/20/2025 2:13 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:52:41 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    As discussed here earlier, the 'sea level rise' of San
    Francisco Bay area is actually geologic subsidence. The
    orogeny is several hundred miles east).

    Agreed. I think we went through this previously when Tom claimed that
    he didn't see any sea level rise on a nearby pier or pilings.
    Searching...

    (Feb 15, 2022) <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/4n0Lzpp8Lxc/m/kNt7yjkoBgAJ> "The local TV station had a program about the building of the San
    Francisco sea wall which was built to allow the filling in of what
    became the financial district in San Francisco. After years of
    claiming sea level rise, in the old photos and even films you could
    plainly see NO CHANGE in sea level in 100 years."

    100 years at the current rate of about 2 mm/year = 200 mm (7.8 inches)
    sea level rise. Somehow, I suspect that seeing that small a rise in
    old photos and files might be rather difficult.

    More:

    "Global climate change and local land subsidence exacerbate inundation
    risk to the San Francisco Bay Area" <https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aap9234>
    "Most of the Pacific shorelines and areas adjacent to the San
    Francisco Bay are subject to subsidence at less than ~2 mm/year.
    Portions of Treasure Island, San Francisco, San Francisco
    International Airport, and Foster City are subsiding as fast as 10 mm/year..."

    "Satellite survey shows California's sinking coastal hotspots" <https://phys.org/news/2020-07-satellite-survey-california-coastal-hotspots.html>
    "Land subsidence can occur due to natural and anthropogenic processes
    or a combination of them. The natural processes comprise tectonics,
    glacial isostatic adjustment, sediment loading, and soil compaction.
    The anthropogenic causes include groundwater extraction and oil and
    gas production."

    "Tracking California’s sinking coast from space: Implications for
    relative sea-level rise"
    <https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aba4551>
    "The subsidence around the banks of the San Francisco Bay (Fig. 3A) is largely influenced by the tectonics of the region, primarily the San
    Andreas Fault. It also is influenced by sediment compaction of the
    landfill and Bay Mud deposits..."


    Subsidence can exacerbate sea-level rise in very localized areas but are
    far from a significant factor of overall sea rise.


    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From zen cycle@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Mar 21 05:17:28 2025
    On 3/20/2025 10:50 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 8:28 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the >>>>>>>>>>>> above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of >>>>>>>>>>>> the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace >>>>>>>>>>>> brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its >>>>>>>>>>>> brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the >>>>>>>>>>> disks are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work done more often >>>>>>>>>>> than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical >>>>>>>>>>> brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change >>>>>>>>>> that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily >>>>>>>>>> turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction >>>>>>>>>> braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do >>>>>>>>>> something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy
    enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure >>>>>>>>>> the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the >>>>>>>>> application.  I suppose they might get just as rusty, but
    invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating might even be >>>>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger >>>>>>>> size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has >>>>>>>> somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and
    charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is >>>>>>>> full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not >>>>>>> usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but
    performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has
    prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in
    the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so
    you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy
    goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars.  I >>>>>>> think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely >>>>>>>> scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric
    vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for >>>>>>> unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs are less than >>>>>>> safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal
    conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then >>>>>>> heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc
    brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is required. >>>>>>>
    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most >>>>>>> users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>>>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a fixed reduction. >>>>
    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine braking, is a >>>> wise
    choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as the smaller
    roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a few miles and
    5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of the longer but >>>> closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and so on, but
    even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be particularly
    demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes quickly, and >>>> likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though perhaps
    taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as
    well as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on
    drum brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with >>>>>> cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and >>>>>> indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year
    as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in >>>>>> soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish >>>>>> at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with
    brief bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty discs on my
    (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick grind but
    is clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy and has been the >>>> wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley
    that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to
    cycle up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming causes
    drought', you need only wait a minute for relief. I'm assisting that
    with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that 'Global Warming
    causes drought'.  The claim is 'Global Warming exaggerates weather
    extremes', which is drought for a few years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of tornadoes and more
    winters with -40 where snow falls further south ;-)


    Yes, we do indeed have winters with excessive snow. And winters with
    scant snow.  There are years with extended brutal cold and winters which
    are mild. We have years with more tornados and years with fewer. In Wisconsin, what we do not have is Global Warming.

    Yes, you do: https://climatology.nelson.wisc.edu/wisconsin-historic-climate-data/statewide-climate-normals/

    This website isn't predictions or white-paper studies, it's hard data.

    Annual Maximum Temperature Averages
    1971-2000: 53.2
    1981-2010: 53.9
    1991-2020: 54

    Annual Mean Temperature Averages
    1971-2000: 42.8
    1981-2010: 43.6
    1991-2020: 43.8

    Annual Minimum Temperature Averages
    1971-2000: 32.4
    1981-2010: 33.2
    1991-2020: 33.7

    Of course differences like these from year to year don't mean squat.
    When observed as a trend over the course of 50 years, it's meaningful.




    Oh, and about that purported 'climate change':

    https://www.americanthinker.com/ blog/2014/08/120_years_of_climate_scares.html#ixzz61lNpThFF


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Merriman@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Mar 21 11:56:25 2025
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 11:44 AM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Wed Mar 19 10:39:49 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/19/2025 9:11 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/18/2025 5:32 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the >>>>>>>>>>> plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake >>>>>>>>>>> pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than >>>>>>>>>> they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction >>>>>>>>> braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do >>>>>>>>> something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the >>>>>>>> application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger
    size?s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has
    somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge >>>>>>> rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is >>>>>>> full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>>>>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance >>>>>> tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >>>>> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the >>>>>>> past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you >>>>>>> could get
    brake fad if you didn?t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods >>>>>> vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think >>>>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely >>>>>>> scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, >>>>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>>>>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than >>>>>> safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then >>>>>> heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>>>>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most >>>>>> users don't seem to do that.


    Don?t need to drive aggressively, just don?t use the gears, on steep >>>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I?m from.

    AFAIK EVs don't have "gears" (with a few notable exceptions, Porsche and >>>> Audi, I believe?)

    They (typically?) have reduction gears. Their electric motors typically
    spin at a much higher rpm than the wheels.
    https://www.reddit.com/r/KiaNiroEV/comments/1iephd2/2023_kia_niro_wave_ev_reduction_gear_fluid_change/




    Because EV's use step down gears rather than the step up of ICE, that is
    one of the fastest wearing components of an EV. But since you don't
    change gears on an EV, gear wear is minimal and the wear is almost
    entirely on the bearings.

    We estimate Teslas new carbon sleeved motor has a 23,308 RPM redline@200
    MPH compared to the P100D redline of 18000 RPM@155 MPH, as well as gear
    ratios the same as P100D.

    All my gasoline powered autos gear down from engine rpm to
    wheels.


    Indeed all types of car engines step down the rpm, I’m assuming even the steam engine cars did? Clearly electric and internal combustion, and gas turbine and so on.

    Some might spin faster than others but all need to reduce the rpm.

    Roger Merriman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Mar 21 07:39:52 2025
    On 3/20/2025 11:30 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 2:13 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 10:52:41 -0500, AMuzi
    <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    As discussed here earlier, the 'sea level rise' of San
    Francisco Bay area is actually geologic subsidence. The
    orogeny is several hundred miles east).

    Agreed.

    Um, disagreed. I don't doubt that SF sees some subsidence.
    But that doesn't make it immune to the main cause of sea
    level rise.

    https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/ climate-change-global-sea-level





    Both can be true: https://nypost.com/2025/03/17/science/hawaii-is-sinking-40-times-faster-than-previously-predicted-study/

    but there are a lot of 'could' and 'might' and 'possibly' in
    expert predictions. I remain open and skeptic.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Mar 21 07:43:11 2025
    On 3/20/2025 11:41 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 11:04 AM, John B. wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:50:20 -0500, AMuzi
    <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    On 3/20/2025 8:28 AM, Rolf Mantel wrote:
    Am 20.03.2025 um 01:26 schrieb AMuzi:
    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like
    that. To the above, it
    added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain
    because of the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to
    replace brake pads,
    and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely
    uses its brakes.)
    According to a couple of my cow-orkers with
    electric vehicles,
    barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem,
    because the disks are
    always rusty.  They report having brake work done
    more often than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the
    mechanical brakes
    every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a
    2022 model, and
    maybe six months ago I started witnessing that
    problem. It's my
    understanding that the 2023 models included a
    software change that
    easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would
    temporarily turn off
    regenerative braking, so after a few stops with
    just friction braking,
    the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember
    if the car
    selected that mode automatically or if the driver
    had to set it.

    Online discussions have given the quirky details on
    how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been
    happy enough by
    occasionally applying the brakes as well as the
    accelerator when
    backing out of the driveway. I can hear the
    scraping. I'm sure the
    disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems
    to be under
    control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better
    fit for the
    application.  I suppose they might get just as
    rusty, but invisibly,
    which would not be an improvement.  Electric heating
    might even be
    reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to
    the larger size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if
    the it has somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or
    hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the
    battery is full or
    close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full,
    and it's not usually
    cold or hot.  Mechanical brakes are absolutely
    required, but performance
    tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all
    the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone
    has prewarmed them
    cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or
    fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T
    plus, in the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and
    even so you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular
    for heavy goods
    vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger
    cars.  I think
    there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a
    fairly unlikely scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe.
    Electric vehicles,
    conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical
    brakes for unusual
    or even emergency braking.  In that role, rusty discs
    are less than
    safe.  A brake that was slightly less effective under
    ideal conditions
    but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could,
    in practice, be
    safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are
    little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection
    of disc brakes is
    not an advantage.  Electric vehicles "use the gears",
    ie brake
    regeneratively, by default.  No skill or judgement is
    required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be
    driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an
    issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the
    gears, on steep
    terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?

    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a
    fixed reduction.

    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine
    braking, is a wise
    choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as
    the smaller roads
    are steep can happen relatively quickly.

    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a
    few miles and 5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of
    the longer but
    closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and
    so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be
    particularly demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes
    quickly, and
    likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though
    perhaps taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not
    work as well as its
    cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill,
    relying on drum brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably
    quickly with cars
    half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine
    problems and indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one
    car per year as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty
    discs even in soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill!
    It’s 25% ish at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st
    gear with brief bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different.  I get audibly rusty
    discs on my (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of
    year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick
    grind but is clear
    after first application, london is on the whole soggy and
    has been the
    wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the
    valley that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly
    painful to cycle up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming
    causes drought', you need only wait a minute for relief.
    I'm assisting that with my four carburetors. You're
    welcome.

    I've neverd heared of a "Green religion" claim that 'Global
    Warming causes drought'.  The claim is 'Global Warming
    exaggerates weather extremes', which is drought for a few
    years followed by flash floods.

    In Wisconsin we only offer doubling the number of tornadoes
    and more winters with -40 where snow falls further
    south ;-)


    Yes, we do indeed have winters with excessive snow. And
    winters with scant snow.  There are years with extended
    brutal cold and winters which are mild. We have years with
    more tornados and years with fewer. In Wisconsin, what we do
    not have is Global Warming.

    Oh, and about that purported 'climate change':

    https://www.americanthinker.com/
    blog/2014/08/120_years_of_climate_scares.html#ixzz61lNpThFF


    On the other hand the seas are rising -

    Florida's Sea Level Is Rising
    And It's Costing Over $4 Billion
    https://sealevelrise.org/states/florida/

    And it _should_ be hard to ignore the fact that glaciers'
    ice volume is decreasing worldwide, almost without exception.



    Change, in both directions, is normal:

    https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145185/major-greenland-glacier-is-growing

    https://www.severe-weather.eu/cryosphere/earth-youngest-glacier-healthy-cryosphere-losing-battle-global-warming-rrc/



    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Mar 21 15:54:35 2025
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:32:30 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 8:56 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:50:32 -0000 (UTC),
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> wrote:

    Oh, I also meant to ask what you thought of going back to the
    old Ultegra derailer with the new shift lever? It obviously
    has enough extension to work well with the large ring, and the
    lever arm looks to be about the same length as the new Tiagra.

    I don't know.
    Quick to just install it and see.

    So in the way of an update, I put the old Ultegra front derailer
    on this morning, and found it seems to work quite well with the
    new Tiagra shift lever. This combination even has more outward
    extension than needed, and I had to bring in the limit screw to
    keep it from throwing the chain off the big ring.

    It's slightly finicky about going from big to middle (a 50 to 39
    jump, but seems to go onto the small ring easily. This is all in
    the stand, so we'll see how it does on the road when the weather
    gets a bit warmer (and less windy, I hope!).

    Thanks again to Andrew for sharing your exceptional wisdom.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Fri Mar 21 11:24:11 2025
    On 3/21/2025 10:54 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 09:32:30 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 8:56 AM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 13:50:32 -0000 (UTC),
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> wrote:

    Oh, I also meant to ask what you thought of going back to the
    old Ultegra derailer with the new shift lever? It obviously
    has enough extension to work well with the large ring, and the
    lever arm looks to be about the same length as the new Tiagra.

    I don't know.
    Quick to just install it and see.

    So in the way of an update, I put the old Ultegra front derailer
    on this morning, and found it seems to work quite well with the
    new Tiagra shift lever. This combination even has more outward
    extension than needed, and I had to bring in the limit screw to
    keep it from throwing the chain off the big ring.

    It's slightly finicky about going from big to middle (a 50 to 39
    jump, but seems to go onto the small ring easily. This is all in
    the stand, so we'll see how it does on the road when the weather
    gets a bit warmer (and less windy, I hope!).

    Thanks again to Andrew for sharing your exceptional wisdom.


    Which model Ultegra Triple (FD-6???) do you have?

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Frank Krygowski on Fri Mar 21 12:16:17 2025
    On 3/21/2025 12:00 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/21/2025 8:43 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/20/2025 11:41 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:

    And it _should_ be hard to ignore the fact that glaciers'
    ice volume is decreasing worldwide, almost without
    exception.



    Change, in both directions, is normal:

    https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145185/major-
    greenland-glacier- is-growing

    https://www.severe-weather.eu/cryosphere/earth-youngest-
    glacier-healthy- cryosphere-losing-battle-global-warming-rrc/

    As usual, you're basing your thinking on rare exceptions.
    From your second article:
    "The European Alps, for instance, represents one of the
    world’s areas with the largest glacier loss. This is mainly
    due to longer and warmer summers, which triggered increased
    melting. Between 1850 and 1975, glaciers in the European
    Alps lost about half of their volume. Another 25% of the
    remaining amount melted between 1975 and 2000 and 10-15%
    more in the first 5 years of the century."

    From https://skepticalscience.com/himalayan-glaciers-
    growing.htm

    "With any glacier, its status in terms of whether it is
    gaining or losing mass is termed its 'mass balance'. Mass
    balance is a mathematical expression of whether a glacier is
    retreating or advancing. It is based on various careful and
    long established measurement techniques, Unfortunately, mass
    balance measurements tell us that a very high percentage of
    Earth's mountain glaciers are in retreat. It is wrong to
    single out the few glaciers that are growing in the face of
    the overall trend of steep decline, in order to argue there
    is no global warming. It's the scientific sin of cherry-
    picking."

    Let's repeat:

    "It is wrong to single out the few glaciers that are growing
    in the face of the overall trend of steep decline, in order
    to argue there is no global warming. It's the scientific sin
    of cherry-picking."


    Yes, change is normal.

    A bit south of here where I grew up, I worked for a time in
    a limestone quarry, 200 feet of sediment built a millimeter
    or so per year in a warm tropic sea. With shells even.

    The exact same are was a mile deep in glacier ice. Perhaps
    more than once.

    We're sorta inbetweenish now.


    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Mar 21 20:59:54 2025
    On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 11:24:11 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/21/2025 10:54 AM, Ted Heise wrote:

    So in the way of an update, I put the old Ultegra front
    derailer on this morning, and found it seems to work quite
    well with the new Tiagra shift lever. This combination even
    has more outward extension than needed, and I had to bring in
    the limit screw to keep it from throwing the chain off the big
    ring.

    It's slightly finicky about going from big to middle (a 50 to
    39 jump, but seems to go onto the small ring easily. This is
    all in the stand, so we'll see how it does on the road when
    the weather gets a bit warmer (and less windy, I hope!).

    Thanks again to Andrew for sharing your exceptional wisdom.

    Which model Ultegra Triple (FD-6???) do you have?

    I really don't know. It came with the bike new in 2012, and all
    the dealer said was "Ultegra". Before I put it on this morning I
    cleaned it up thoroughly and saw no other markings than "Ultegra."
    Is there a way to tell, other than educated guessing based on the
    vintage?

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Fri Mar 21 16:29:06 2025
    On 3/21/2025 3:59 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 11:24:11 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:
    On 3/21/2025 10:54 AM, Ted Heise wrote:

    So in the way of an update, I put the old Ultegra front
    derailer on this morning, and found it seems to work quite
    well with the new Tiagra shift lever. This combination even
    has more outward extension than needed, and I had to bring in
    the limit screw to keep it from throwing the chain off the big
    ring.

    It's slightly finicky about going from big to middle (a 50 to
    39 jump, but seems to go onto the small ring easily. This is
    all in the stand, so we'll see how it does on the road when
    the weather gets a bit warmer (and less windy, I hope!).

    Thanks again to Andrew for sharing your exceptional wisdom.

    Which model Ultegra Triple (FD-6???) do you have?

    I really don't know. It came with the bike new in 2012, and all
    the dealer said was "Ultegra". Before I put it on this morning I
    cleaned it up thoroughly and saw no other markings than "Ultegra."
    Is there a way to tell, other than educated guessing based on the
    vintage?


    The part number is stamped on the inner face of the cage
    (for all Shimano front changers)

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted Heise@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Fri Mar 21 22:13:59 2025
    On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:29:06 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    Which model Ultegra Triple (FD-6???) do you have?

    The part number is stamped on the inner face of the cage (for
    all Shimano front changers)

    Huh, who knew? I thought I'd looked it over very carefully, but
    clearly did not. I'm such a dumbass.

    It's FD-6703.

    --
    Ted Heise <theise@panix.com> West Lafayette, IN, USA

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to Ted Heise on Fri Mar 21 17:23:51 2025
    On 3/21/2025 5:13 PM, Ted Heise wrote:
    On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 16:29:06 -0500,
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

    Which model Ultegra Triple (FD-6???) do you have?

    The part number is stamped on the inner face of the cage (for
    all Shimano front changers)

    Huh, who knew? I thought I'd looked it over very carefully, but
    clearly did not. I'm such a dumbass.

    It's FD-6703.


    Thanks. That makes sense:

    https://productinfo.shimano.com/pdfs/product/archive/2012_Compatibility_en.pdf

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    am@yellowjersey.org
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Radey Shouman@21:1/5 to AMuzi on Sat Mar 22 01:14:07 2025
    AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> writes:

    On 3/19/2025 7:00 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Roger Merriman <roger@sarlet.com> writes:

    Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    On 3/16/2025 8:16 PM, Radey Shouman wrote:
    Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> writes:

    Our previous car, a Mazda 3, was almost like that. To the above, it >>>>>>>>>> added changing oil and filter (a bit of a pain because of the plastic
    under-panels that needed removed). I did have to replace brake pads, >>>>>>>>>> and do some minor brake repair. (The EV barely uses its brakes.) >>>>>>>>> According to a couple of my cow-orkers with electric vehicles, >>>>>>>>> barely
    using the mechanical brakes can be a problem, because the disks are >>>>>>>>> always rusty. They report having brake work done more often than they
    recall for internal combustion vehicles.
    One would think the software would just apply the mechanical brakes >>>>>>>>> every once in a while, but it seems otherwise.
    Your mileage may vary.

    You're correct about the rusty disks. My car is a 2022 model, and >>>>>>>> maybe six months ago I started witnessing that problem. It's my >>>>>>>> understanding that the 2023 models included a software change that >>>>>>>> easily enabled disk scrubbing. That mode would temporarily turn off >>>>>>>> regenerative braking, so after a few stops with just friction braking, >>>>>>>> the disks would be polished clean. I don't remember if the car >>>>>>>> selected that mode automatically or if the driver had to set it. >>>>>>>>
    Online discussions have given the quirky details on how to do
    something similar with my car, but so far I've been happy enough by >>>>>>>> occasionally applying the brakes as well as the accelerator when >>>>>>>> backing out of the driveway. I can hear the scraping. I'm sure the >>>>>>>> disks aren't perfectly clean of rust, but it seems to be under >>>>>>>> control. I'll check when weather gets better.

    One has to wonder if drum brakes might be a better fit for the
    application. I suppose they might get just as rusty, but invisibly, >>>>>>> which would not be an improvement. Electric heating might even be >>>>>>> reasonable to keep them dry inside.

    Considering the weight of modern cars and EV tend to the larger size’s as
    space for batteries.

    And that regeneration though powerful only works if the it has somewhere to
    transfer the power to, so if the battery is cold or hot, and charge rate is
    low the braking performance would decrease and if the battery is full or >>>>>> close to, it has nowhere to regen to.

    True, but the battery is hardly ever actually full, and it's not usually >>>>> cold or hot. Mechanical brakes are absolutely required, but performance >>>>> tradeoffs are different to vehicles that use them all the time.

    The battery will be cold upon starting unless someone has prewarmed them >>>> cold, and as most EV owners charge at home full or fairly full.

    Which would leave the drum brakes to handle a car 2T plus, in the past with
    drums cars where certainly in uk less than a ton, and even so you could get
    brake fad if you didn’t use the gears on the hills.

    In the US (air operated) drum brakes remained popular for heavy goods >>>>> vehicles long after discs became standard on passenger cars. I think >>>>> there are still quite a lot of them on the road.

    So I can absolutely see why car makers even if a fairly unlikely scenario
    would play safe!

    The trouble is figuring out what is actually safe. Electric vehicles, >>>>> conservatively driven, essentially use the mechanical brakes for unusual >>>>> or even emergency braking. In that role, rusty discs are less than
    safe. A brake that was slightly less effective under ideal conditions >>>>> but more likely to be near peak effectiveness could, in practice, be >>>>> safer and more predictable.

    Brake fade is caused by heating; if the brakes are little used then
    heating is not a problem and the better heat rejection of disc brakes is >>>>> not an advantage. Electric vehicles "use the gears", ie brake
    regeneratively, by default. No skill or judgement is required.

    It is certainly true that an electric vehicle *can* be driven
    aggressively to the point where brake heating is an issue, but most
    users don't seem to do that.


    Don’t need to drive aggressively, just don’t use the gears, on steep >>>> terrain, of which there is plenty where I’m from.

    What are these "gears"?
    In a ICE car gearbox, clearly most EV only have one, a fixed
    reduction.
    Certainly in the area I’m from, learning to use engine braking, is a
    wise
    choice to prevent cooking brakes and brake fade which as the smaller roads >> are steep can happen relatively quickly.
    Obviously larger dual carriageway type roads even if a few miles and
    5/10%
    aren’t particularly taxing on brakes, and even some of the longer but
    closer to 10% roads yes you need to brake for corners and so on, but even
    so, unless you drive aggressively doesn’t seem to be particularly demanding
    it’s the 20% give or take stuff that will heat up brakes quickly, and
    likewise engines on cold days if one drives up, though perhaps taking it
    relatively easy.

    Which leads to the possibility that the regen will not work as well as its >>>> cold/and fairly full and your driving down the hill, relying on drum brakes
    which quite frankly one could cook ie fade remarkably quickly with cars >>>> half the weight of modern cars, it’s not easy imagine problems and indeed
    lawsuits!

    The steepest of the hills seems to average about one car per year as it is!
    The neighbours with the EV I’m sure don’t have rusty discs even in soggy
    wales, and I know enjoy its torque back up the hill! It’s 25% ish at peak,
    cars and bikes are equal in there gear useage ie 1st gear with brief bursts
    into 2nd when it’s *only* 13% or so!

    I guess the climate is different. I get audibly rusty discs on my (gas
    powered) car if it sits for a day or two at this time of year.

    I only use my car once a week or so, tends to have quick grind but is clear >> after first application, london is on the whole soggy and has been the
    wettest 12 months on record apparently!

    All of the roads are similar, is one on the edge of the valley that’s peaks
    at 35% and averages 28% between two corners, fairly painful to cycle up and
    type 2 sort of fun as you where!

    Roger Merriman



    Roger Merriman


    Well since the Green Religion teaches that 'Global Warming causes
    drought', you need only wait a minute for relief. I'm assisting that
    with my four carburetors. You're welcome.

    Also causes floods, so it's hard to be sure.
    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)