On 3/21/2025 4:39 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 3/21/2025 11:48 AM, Zen Cycle wrote:
(you'll need this whole link to get past the paywall)
I still got stopped by the paywall. :-(
SmartBrief
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/lab-tested-40mm-road-
tyres-are- faster-for-nearly-everyone-and-heres-why/?
utm_term=3F94C1B0-2336-481F-9F48-87A3862079D2&lrh=1e399577e82ec4e44eb4d33bfcaad09d796bd8e1f682e0f7bf32df00ae420a83&utm_campaign=A8C132A5-BD9C-4737-AC90-016639AFEA3E&utm_medium=email&utm_content=42C26C62-AEF4-4540-8653-17C0A3DB0CE6&utm_source=
CyclingNews compares the latest 40c offering from Pirelli.
It's a long and well-written article, whether you agree
with the findings or not.
email client formatting error. Me too on first try.
I copied and pasted into a text editor then removed the
space after:
are-
and the space after:
why/?
then coped and pasted into Firefox as an unbroken address.
https://www.cyclingnews.com/features/lab-tested-40mm-road-tyres-are-faster-for-nearly-everyone-and-heres-why/?utm_term=3F94C1B0-2336-481F-9F48-87A3862079D2&lrh=1e399577e82ec4e44eb4d33bfcaad09d796bd8e1f682e0f7bf32df00ae420a83&utm_campaign=A8C132A5-BD9C-4737-AC90-016639AFEA3E&utm_medium=email&utm_content=42C26C62-AEF4-4540-8653-17C0A3DB0CE6&utm_source=SmartBrief
On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 22:10:47 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
They corrected the bugs in Newshosting after my continuous complaints and it works fine.
So why does your subject line continue to produce garbage like this?
From: cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Job
Offer
Nothing has changed. It's version still 3.2.2, the same as what I
downloaded about 1 year ago: <https://www.newshosting.com/newsreader-download.php>
On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 14:58:20 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>slipped the mind of the smartest man in the world that has never held a real job and lives on welfare?
wrote:
On Sat Mar 22 16:20:32 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 22:10:47 GMT, cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
wrote:
They corrected the bugs in Newshosting after my continuous complaints and it works fine.
So why does your subject line continue to produce garbage like this?
From: cyclintom <cyclintom@yahoo.com>
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: Re: Job
Offer
Nothing has changed. It's version still 3.2.2, the same as what I
downloaded about 1 year ago:
<https://www.newshosting.com/newsreader-download.php>
As usual Lie Bermann believes himself to be the expert on everything. I uoloaded Newshosting 7 years ago and after I got ZERO response on my problems I doiwnloaded a ew version recently. I said this AT THE TIME. So how is it that it seems to have
I thought you might like to know that four (or more) of your previous postings to rec.bicycles.tech are in response to postings from March,
2025, which is 4 months ago. You might want to adjust the time
dilation compensation on your newsreader as it seems that time rather
slowly for you. I suspect this might be due to excessive downhill
cycling speeds, but without Strava data, I can't be sure.
On 3/22/2025 6:20 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
Again, very good article. Thanks to Zen for calling attention to it.
You're welcome, but sorry for the difficulty people seem to have
encountered with the link. Since it came from my personal account with
them, I futzted with the link a bit until I could find a version I could paste into a "private" browser window and still work, but there must
have been some residual cookies in my system that let it work.
At any rate, yes, there seems to be more and more vindication for wider
tires and the bikes needed to support them as time goes on. It's amazing
how I was brought into the racing world being told skinny high-pressure
tires were the way to go, while older school people back when I started
were pooh poohing the idea. I remember one old codger at the local time
trial in the 1980s saying that skinny tires should only be used on the
track (he was the last guy to show up at the TT with wooden rims). It
seems like we should have taken his word back then.
On 3/22/2025 11:10 PM, zen cycle wrote:
At any rate, yes, there seems to be more and more vindication for wider tires and the bikes needed to support them as time goes on. It's amazing how I was brought into the racing world being told skinny high-pressure tires were the way to go, while older school people back when I started were pooh poohing the idea. I remember one old codger at the local time trial in the 1980s saying that skinny tires should only be used on the track (he was the last guy to show up at the TT with wooden rims). It
seems like we should have taken his word back then.
AFAIK, the trend toward accepting the benefits of wider tires was
started by Jan Heine with his coast down tests on outdoor soapbox derby tracks. He pointed out that those tests were more representative of real world riding than were the smooth rolling drum tests of the day. And he
was inspired to do the tests by his fascination with French
randonneuring bikes of the '50s and '60s.
The speed benefits are usually explained by less energy transmitted to
the rider's flesh, where it is lost (and adds discomfort). In this
forum, I remember Jobst rather fiercely defending rolling drum data, and saying that those energy losses should not be considered part of rolling resistance.
That may be a semantic argument. It's clear those losses are real, and
they need to be considered _somewhere_.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 45:30:49 |
Calls: | 10,394 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,066 |
Messages: | 6,417,268 |